August 13, 2013

August 13, 2013

CMS National Dry Run:Risk-Standardized Payment

Measure: Acute Myocardial Infarction

30-day Episode of Care

2

• Introductions (next)

• Purpose of Dry Run and Measure

• Proposed Implementation

• Dry Run Overview

• Measure Details

• Resources

• Questions and Answers

Agenda

3

• Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

• Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation – Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE)

• Mathematica Policy Research (MPR)

Introductions

4

• Introductions

• Purpose of Dry Run and Measure (next)



• Measure Details

• Resources


Agenda

5

• Educate hospitals about new measures

• Provide hospitals with results and data

• Help hospitals interpret results and data

• Encourage hospitals to ask questions

Purpose of Dry Run

6

• Cost: the amount incurred in providing services

• Payment: the amount paid on behalf of a Medicare patient for health care services

• Risk-standardized payment: an amount that has been modified to make payments comparable across hospitals

Defining Common Terms

7

• Inpatient hospitalizations contribute to rising healthcare costs1, 2

• Payments reflect costs from Medicare’s perspective

• Variations in care patterns affect payments made by CMS

• Payments reported in conjunction with outcome quality measures, such as AMI mortality, will illuminate high-value care

1. Health Care Cost Institute, 2010; 2. Jha AK, et. al., Health Affairs, 2009

Why report a payment measure?

8

• AMI is a common and expensive condition among Medicare beneficiaries

• AMI episode requires care in hospital and post-discharge

• There is substantial variation in payments • In hospital practice patterns• Post-discharge care

Why measure payment for an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) episode?

9Mean national payment is for 2008-2009 and is in 2009 dollars

• Mean national payment: $20,751

• Hospital risk-standardized payment (RSP) range:

$13,909 - $28,979

Variability in Payments

10

• Making care more affordable is a priority within the National Quality Strategy (NQS) and CMS Quality Strategy

• In response to the NQS, CMS is analyzing efficiency. Currently measures exist in the following programs:• Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program• Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program• Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting Program• Physician Value-Based Modifier Program

• Support efforts to make payments and quality more transparent to consumers and providers

Addressing Affordable Care

11

• Introductions


• Proposed Implementation (next)


• Measure Details

• Resources


Agenda

12

• In the IPPS FY 2014 Final Rule, CMS added the AMI payment measure to the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) program

• If finalized, CMS will publicly report the measure results on Hospital Compare

Proposed Implementation

13

• Introductions



• Dry Run Overview (next)

• Measure Details

• Resources


Agenda

14

• Timeline: August 5 – September 4, 2013

• Access to Hospital-Specific Reports• QualityNet

• Results:• Hospital-Specific Report (HSR)• Measure Information and Instructions Report

• Resources:• Methodology reports, FAQs, other materials• [email protected]

Dry Run Overview

mailto:[email protected]

15

2013 Dry Run Timeline

16

• Introductions



• Measure Details (next)


• Resources


Agenda

17

• Home health agency• Non-institutional providers (e.g., physicians and independent labs)• Durable medical equipment

• Inpatient• Skilled nursing facility• Outpatient• Hospice

• Hospital-level, risk-standardized payments for an AMI episode of care

• Admission to 30 days post-admission

• Includes payments for the index admission and post-discharge settings, including:

Measure Design

18

• Chronic Condition Warehouse (CCW) Data• Medicare administrative claims data

• 100% of patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of AMI

• Why use CCW?• Can follow patients across multiple care settings using a

unique patient identifier

Data Source

19

• Non-federal short-term acute care hospitals• Critical access hospitals (CAH) are included

• Dry run includes patients: • Discharged in 2008-2009 • ≥65 years of age• Principal discharge diagnosis of AMI (defined by

ICD-9 codes 410.xx, excluding 410.x2)• Randomly select one index admission per patient

for patients with multiple admissions

Inclusion Criteria

20

Enrolled in hospice within one year prior to or on date of index admission (0.83%)

Incomplete administrative data in the 30 days following the index admission (if alive) (1.25%)

Same- or next-day discharge and patient did not die or get transferred (4.80%)

Transfers into the hospital (6.95%)

Inconsistent or unknown vital status (0.01%)

Unreliable data (0.05%)

Discharges against medical advice (AMA) (0.38%)

Admissions within 30 days of a prior index admission (0.02%)

Transfers to federal hospitals (0.04%)

Initial Index Cohort 2008-2009 Calendar Year Data Set

N=367,850

Randomly select one hospitalization per patient

N=351,013Hospitalizations not selected (4.6%)

Final Index Cohort 2008-2009 Calendar Year Dataset

N=350,930

Total Discharges 2008-2009 Calendar Year Data Set

N=422,842

Missing DRG or DRG weight (0.07%)

Exclusion criteria

21

• Payments for both admissions and post-discharge care are combined to calculate total payment

• Total payment assigned to the initial admitting hospital

Transferred Patients

22

• Payments made for care that begins during measurement period but ends after measurement period are prorated

Prorating Payments

23

• Includes payments from admission to 30 days post-admission

• Incorporates claims from across all care settings

• Removes or averages payment adjustments unrelated to care• Geography (wage index, cost of living)• Policy adjustments (IME, DSH, etc.)

Payment Calculation

24

• Goal is to assess payments influenced by clinical decisions

• Payment adjustments such as wage index are unrelated to clinical decisions/practice patterns of care

• Using actual payments would not allow for a fair comparison across hospitals

Removing Payment Adjustments

25

• To isolate differences in payments that reflect practice patterns, the measure estimates payments by:

• Stripping: • Removing geographic adjustments• Removing policy adjustments

• Standardizing: • Average payments across geographic areas

when geographic differences cannot be removed

Removing Payment Adjustments: Stripping/Standardizing

26

• Accounts for differences in patient characteristics and comorbidities across hospitals

• Includes:• Secondary diagnosis codes from index admission

(except for potential complications of care)• All diagnosis codes from previous year from:

• acute inpatient hospital stays• hospital outpatient care• physician, radiology, and laboratory services

Risk Adjustment

27

• Calculating risk-standardized payment (RSP)

Risk-Standardized Payments

28

• Categories of measure results:• Less than U.S. average national payment

• No different than U.S. average national payment

• Greater than U.S. average national payment

• Number of cases too small (<25 cases)

• Final RSP reported with interval estimate

Categorizing Hospital Results

29

Risk-Standardized Payment ($)

U.S. National Average Payment($20,751)

Less than national payment

Example Hospital 1$16,560 ($14,600, $18,735)


Greater than national payment


No different than national payment

14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000

Categorizing Hospital Performance

30

• Introductions




• Measure Details

• Resources (next)


Agenda

31

• http://www.QualityNet.org

Resources

http://www.qualitynet.org/

32

• Email Q&A period

August 5 – September 4, 2013

[email protected]

Note: Please do NOT email or attach to emails any patient identifiable information

Questions & Comments

mailto:[email protected]

33

Questions?

Documents

August 13, 2013