Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 1The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
cc: [email protected]@attgen.ca.gov
Dear Mr. Marcus,
I bring you greetings and an opportunity. I have attempted to resolve a matter with SCE and not being an expert in the law, as just a reasonable man I regard the behavior of the management of SCE as possibly being of a criminal nature; fraud and misrepresentation. And I have also come to believe the agency for which you work, is a de facto agency and if that is true, then you sir are also an agent operating as a de facto public official. I believe such an official impersonating a legitimate public official is acting as a criminal impersonator.
Your agent, Ms. "Abadjian, Kristina" <[email protected]> was very specific as to the classification as a public official. However, Mr. Marcus, regardless of what you call yourself, the matter at hand requires your immediate attention.
May I also make you aware that a copy of this communication along with the data to support my complaint is being sent to the Attorney General of California. The Atty. Gen. is responsible to address matters of fraud.
This matter may be either a form of elder abuse, retaliation or just incompetence. After having attempted to resolve this matter in good faith, I think I have done my fair share and am now calling on you to resolve this matter.
Since I am over 80, it is time some of you youngsters pretending to be legitimate public servants start to do the job for which you are taking money from the public trust.
The issues of concern…• Improper use of a billing system to commit extortion and fraud.• Misrepresentation as a taxing authority and applying undue burden of taxation
on unsuspecting clients with what I am led to believe is authorization from your agency.
• Imposing questionable sanctions discriminating against opt-out Smart meter
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 2The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
clients.• Deliberately creating a telephone tree system to protect executives who have
conspired to deliberately avoid direct contact with clients and avoiding resolving customer complaints.
• SCE is a foreign owned corporation just like Washington, D.C. How can American public officials sell out their constituents by permitting foreign interest to control the life-blood energy system of electrical power? A breach of national security?
• SCE must refund all overcharges as well as extra fees collected unlawfully due to smart meter installation refusal.
I look forward to your immediate action in this matter to avoid further complications.
The favor of your response is expected within 5 days.
Thank you,
arnie, just one of the [email protected]
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 3The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
Looking at this statement do you see a problem?
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 4The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
Do you see where the total usage has been recorded as 2,372 kwhs? Do you also see where the “high usage” charge begins at 1113 kwhs.
So what is up on this? How about deliberate manipulation of the meter readings? They estimate low every other month. Then on the alternative months when an actual meter reading is performed the reading is off the chart and I qualify for a “conservation incentive…” Say what?
Yes an extra tax I call it of $165.00 on this bill alone plus $36.15 public purpose charge.
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 5The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
To confirm these results, I took my own meter reading at approximate times at the end of the months indicated. While my recorded data does not perfectly coincide with Edison, it is close enough to illustrate the problem. But is a problem? Or is it fraud?
Well you be the judge…
Just to bring this matter up to date...Edison adjusted my bill: Sep 10, 2016 Bill Statement -$19.56
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 6The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
The following is the results of a worksheet created to reconcile these charges. Anticipating the continued policy of underestimating the charges and usage in the estimated month and then combining the estimate with the actual the current billing final month. It seems they are doing this deliberately and are fraudulently manipulating the books to take advantage of my age, over 80 and my stupidity.
Now how can I make such a claim, Judge for yourself...I explained the situation and my complaint was acknowledged. Even the bill was adjusted but to my way of thinking not correctly and I was again overcharged.
Edison Customer Service Agent part 1:Edison Customer Service Agent part 2:
To prove my point, I took meter reading pictures at approximately the time the meter would have been normally read. I used these reading to correct the low ball estimates Edison continued to use even though I told them they must fix their estimating process. I substituted the estimated values used by Edison with my values obtained from my own meter readings. See photographs below.
Using the correct values you can see that February billings would actually be below the threshold of triggering the tiering system. Since I advised them of this problem and my call after I received the February bill was not returned, I must conclude this matter is criminal.
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 7The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
Picture taken around November 27, 2016
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 8The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
The California Public Utilities Commission was contacted attempting to determine the lawful status of the agency. Being an appointed board, there is little incentive to display the proper respect for the American sovereigns who pay in advance for the services that seem to be an illusion.
To that point permit me to share something you may find of interest…• American Sovereign/Public Servant Relationship Explained!
On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:38 AM, Arnie Rosner <[email protected]> wrote:Dear Mr. Marcus,
Would you please be kind enough to answer a few question regarding the CPUC?
1 Are employees of the CPUC considered public servants? 2 Are the commissioners considered public officers?3 Are the officers elected or appointed?4 Is the CPUC considered a legislative body or an advisory body?5 Can you briefly describe the authorities by which the commissioners apply their
administrative and regulating efforts.6 Does the CPUC possess any taxing authority?7 From where comes the authorities invoked in the performance of their
administrative/regulative tasks?
Thank you.arnie, just one of the [email protected]
I received the following answer:
On Sep 12, 2016, at 6:48 PM, Arnie Rosner <[email protected]> wrote:Thank you Kristina,
As an analyst where do you fit into the executive hierarchy? Are you a public officer?
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 9The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
arnie, just one of the [email protected]
On Sep 12, 2016, at 5:22 PM, Abadjian, Kristina <[email protected]> wrote:Hello, Answers to your questions are below, in red. Kristina AbadjianRegulatory Analyst | Public Advisor’s OfficeCalifornia Public Utilities Commissionwww.cpuc.ca.gov | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube From: Arnie Rosner [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:38 AMTo: Marcus, MatthewSubject: The extent of the authority of the CPUC? Dear Mr. Marcus, Would you please be kind enough to answer a few question regarding the CPUC? 8 Are employees of the CPUC considered public servants? Yes.2 Are the commissioners considered public officers?They are considered public officials.3 Are the officers elected or appointed?The commissioners are appointed by the Governor of California.4 Is the CPUC considered a legislative body or an advisory body?The CPUC is a regulatory body.5 Can you briefly describe the authorities by which the commissioners apply their administrative
and regulating efforts.The CPUC’s regulatory duties include the adoption of utility rate changes, rules on safety and service standards, implementation of conservation programs, investigation into unlawful or anticompetitive practices by regulated utilities and intervention into federal proceedings which affect California ratepayers.6 Does the CPUC possess any taxing authority?The CPUC sets certain surcharge and tax rates collected by telecommunications carriers within the state of California. Please click here for more information.7 From where comes the authorities invoked in the performance of their administrative/
regulative tasks?The California State Constitution and the California Public Utilities Code.
Attn Attorney General - Edison - acting with the deliberately premeditated intent to defraud?
Presented as a courtesy of the scannedretina [email protected] 714-964-4056 Page - 10The Scanned Retina; A Private Citizen Advocacy Membership Group, dedicated to SecuringLawful Constitutional Compliance for all Americans
Thank you.arnie, just one of the [email protected]
