Upload
erika-talford
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What is Prenatal Care?Prenatal care: any health care given to a pregnant woman after conception and before birth.
Usually commences during the first trimester of pregnancy and includes 10-14 visits throughout the course of the pregnancy.
Visits usually involve medical screening, physical exams, education and counseling, and help with social services for women.
Benefits of Prenatal CareCan reduce the likelihood of a woman giving birth early or to a low-birth-weight baby, as well as detect various anomalies that can be treated in-utero.
Can decrease the time a neonate spends in the hospital, thereby reducing overall costs which is especially important for low-income women.
Improve the mother’s health by detection of conditions that the woman may develop during pregnancy (e.g. hypertension and diabetes) which could pose a potential threat to the fetus.
Republic of the Marshall Islands
Population:67,182 (July 2011 est.)
Infant mortality:23.74 deaths/1,000 live births (2011 est.)
Life expectancy:71.76 years (2011 est.)
Fertility rate:3.44 children born/woman (2011 est.)
Median age: 21.8 years (2011 est.)
Net migration rate:-5.19 migrant(s)/1,000 population (2011 est.) rm-map.gif
Health Status in the RMI“Dual epidemic:” chronic health issues (e.g. heart problems and diabetes) and communicable diseases (e.g. Hansen’s disease, tuberculosis, etc.)
Transition from marine foraging to more sedentary lifestyles plus American dietary principles has led to increases in obesity, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, etc.
Malnutrition: diet poor in vitamins and minerals
Radiation related issues: thyroid, some cancers, etc.
Marshallese Health Beliefs
Family
“Untraditional” when compared to American notion of “normal”
Multiple families living in same households; 8-12 kids common
“Clan raised”
Circular migration
Health Beliefs Cont’dTime
Focus on the present, little regard for future
Makes preventative care difficult
Frustrates appointment schedules
Illness
Illness=pain. Therefore, if no pain, no illness. Will discontinue treatment when begin to feel better
Sick are often shunned and feel ashamed so do not readily admit illness
Gender RolesWomen:
Raising children
Home maintenance
Direct decision making
Health issues related to women and children
Men:
Protect family
Provide food and shelter
Speak for the family
Share in decision making
Compact of Free AssociationIssued in 1986, outlines relationship between U.S. and RMI:
U.S.: provides defense protection, financial aid, the ability to enter and exit the country without visa or time limit
RMI: continues to serve as a nuclear testing site and provide exclusive military rights to the United States
A Marshallese individual may enter the U.S. with only a passport, obtain a social security number, work, attend school, and serve in the U.S. military.
The compact does not provide a pathway to citizenship and prohibits most state or federal funding.
Reasons for Leaving RMI
Physical lack of land
Population explosion
Poor economy
Employment opportunities in U.S.
Better health care
Better educational opportunities for children
Family members living in U.S.
BackgroundThe Marshallese population of NWA is estimated to be between 6,000 and 10,000 (the highest number outside of the Marshall Islands)
The incidences of tuberculosis, Hansen’s disease, diabetes, HIV, syphilis (including congenital), and perinatal hepatitis B are all increased in the Marshallese population when compared to the general population
Health Profile67% of congenital syphilis cases in NWA were of Marshallese ethnicity
54% of these cases were identified at birth (only 31% were identified during prenatal screening)
The incidence of perinatal hepatitis B among Marshallese increased from 8.1 cases per 1000 live births in 2003 to 16.8 cases per 1000 live births in 2005
Trends in Prenatal Care
Less likely to seek prenatal care: 34% of Marshallese women do not seek prenatal care whereas only 2% of non-Marshallese women do not
Less likely to be screened for HBsAG: 57% of Marshallese women were screened, as compared to 91% of non-Marshallese women
More likely to test positive when screened for HBsAG: 10% of Marshallese women tested positive, as compared to 0% of non-Marshallese women
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to investigate the attitudes toward and impediments to prenatal care among women of child-bearing age in the Marshallese population in Northwest Arkansas.
Aim 1
Aim 1: Explore the attitudes of Marshallese women towards prenatal care.
Research question 1: How does the Marshallese culture view prenatal care?
Research question 2: How do Marshallese women describe their experience with prenatal care in northwest Arkansas?
Aim 2Aim 2: Explore barriers to prenatal care as viewed by Marshallese women.
Research question 1: How knowledgeable are Marshallese women of child-bearing age about opportunities for prenatal care in northwest Arkansas?
Research question 2: What environmental factors impact noncompliance (e.g. money, transportation, etc)?
Aim 3Aim 3: Identify ways to improve Marshallese women’s experience with prenatal care.
Research question 1: What suggestions to improve prenatal compliance do Marshallese women have?
Research question 2: What measures by health care professionals and institutions do Marshallese women identify would promote a better prenatal experience?
Sample
Qualifications for participation in the study:
Female
Marshallese ethnicity
Between the ages of 18-45 (child-bearing age)
15 participants ranging in age from 19 to 45
Mean age = 33.13 years; Standard deviation: 7.298 years
Design
An interview was developed based on the health belief model
Accompanied nurse from the Washington County Health Department on Marshallese home visits to interview participants
Accompanied member of the Marshallese community associated with the Marshallese consulate to conduct interviews
Interview DetailsQualitative exploratory interview process
Each interview occurred face-to-face and an interpreter was present for each interview
Each interview took about 30 minutes
Each participant had her own copy of the interview on which responses were recorded
Informed consent was acquired at the beginning of each interview
Interview Breakdown
43 questions
13 questions involved demographic inquiries (e.g. age, time lived in United States, number of children, etc.)
10 questions were related to potential barriers to receiving prenatal care (e.g. transportation, money, etc.)
12 questions were related to prenatal health beliefs:
2 questions addressed perceived susceptibility, 4 questions addressed perceived severity, 4 questions addressed perceived benefits, and 2 questions addressed perceived barriers
6 questions involved evaluation of reasons to seek prenatal care
2 questions inviting participants to share other thoughts, experiences, etc. related to prenatal care
Approval and Funding
Interview approved by Department of Health nurse as well as member of the Marshallese community
University of Arkansas Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) grant funding
Data AnalysisMean, median, standard deviation, and frequencies were performed on all of the data to assess for initial patterns and trends
Non-parametric correlation test utilizing Spearman rho was done to identify significant relationships between data
Some items asked the same question in different ways, so variables were combined. Reliability analysis was run for each combination
Time Spent in the U.S.Ranged from one month to 360 months (30 years)(M=91.27, SD=101.321)
The longer one spends in the country, the less likely it is that the pregnancy was planned (p<0.023)
The more time spent in the U.S., the less likely it is to be afraid to talk to strangers, especially male doctors (p<0.004)
Many participants said that they would be willing to go to a foreign male doctor, but not a Marshallese male doctor
Health Insurance46.7% (n=7) of participants do not have any form of health insurance.
Of the 53.3% (n=8) who do have health insurance, 50%(n=4) identified themselves as possessing public insurance (e.g. Medicaid) whereas the other 50% (n=4) possess private insurance (e.g. through job or spouse’s job).
The more children one has, the more likely that the individual will have some sort of health insurance (p<0.009)
Number of ChildrenThe number of children per participant ranged from 1 to 7 (M=4.07, SD=1.831).
The incidence of adoption among participants can be seen in Table 2.
Only one participant had any children die.
The more children one has, the less likely to be afraid of seeing a male doctor (p<0.043)
Number of Prenatal Visits
100% (n=3) of participants who did not receive any prenatal care had a problem during delivery (p<0.009)
In 2005, 34% of Marshallese women received no prenatal care
Prenatal Care Locations
More research needs to be done to determine why participants chose the location that they did.
Problems During Pregnancy
20% (n=3) of participants admitted to having a problem during pregnancy.
Complications identified: urinary tract infection, renal issues, diabetes mellitus, and baby in breech position (Caesarean-section necessitated upon delivery)
Complications During Delivery
26.7%(n=4) of participants conceded to having complications during delivery.
Problems during delivery included: Caesarean-section (n=2, 13.3%), cord wrapping around baby’s head (n=1, 6.7%), and baby being born prematurely (n=1, 6.7%).
100%(n=4) of participants who had a problem during delivery strongly agreed (rated as 5) that they were afraid of the medical exam in the barrier portion of the interview
Incidence of Regular Health Care Providers
80%(n=12) of participants do not see a doctor or health care provider for regular check ups
This correlates to two Marshallese health beliefs: the absence of pain indicates that they are healthy, and the focus on the present with little notion of preventative health care
Incidence of Planned Pregnancy
20%(n=3) of participants’ most recent pregnancy was planned.
This could be attributed to a cultural/religious belief or a lack of awareness about family planning.
More research could be done to ascertain the reason why women do not plan pregnancies
Methods of Confirming Pregnancy
80%(n=12) confirmed themselves as pregnant
20%(n=3) of participants confirmed their most recent pregnancy by going to a doctor or health clinic,
20%(n=3) by experiencing nausea/morning sickness,
33.3%(n=5) by missing a menstrual cycle, and
26.7%(n=4) claimed they “knew” they were pregnant.
Potentially dangerous for mother and fetus
Evaluation of Barriers to Prenatal Care
Statement 1 2 3 4 5
I couldn’t get an appointment when I wanted one.
11/73.3% 0/0% 0/0% 0/0% 4/26.7%
I didn’t have enough money or insurance to pay for my visits.
11/73.3% 0/0% 0/0% 2/13.3% 2/13.3%
I had no way to get to the clinic or doctor’s office.
11/73.3% 0/0% 0/0% 0/0% 4/26.7%
I couldn’t take time off from work. (n=14) 13/92.9% 0/0% 0/0% 0/0% 1/7.1%
I had no one to take care of my children. (n=14)
12/85.7% 1/7.1% 0/0% 0/0% 1/7.1%
I have to talk to people I don’t know. 12/80% 0/0% 0/0% 2/13.3% 1/6.7%
I had no problems with previous pregnancies.
3/20% 0/0% 0/0% 0/0% 12/80%
I was afraid of the medical exam. 10/66.7% 0/0% 0/0% 0/0% 5/33.3%
I was afraid to see a male doctor. 10/66.7% 0/0% 1/6.7% 1/6.7% 3/20%
I had a bad experience with prior care. (n=14)
12/85.7% 1/7.1% 0/0% 0/0% 1/7.1%
Most Common Barriers
Top four deterrents to prenatal care were:
No problems with previous pregnancies
Fear of the medical exam
Difficulty getting an appointment
Transportation
Health Belief ResponsesQuestions 1 2 3 4 5
My baby could develop serious health problems if I don’t come for
prenatal care.2/13.3% 0/0% 1/6.7% 1/6.7% 11/73.3%
I could develop serious health problems if I don’t come for prenatal
care.1/6.7% 0/0% 1/6.7% 0/0% 13/86.7%
Prenatal care is important to the health of my baby. 1/6.7% 0/0% 0/0% 0/0% 14/93.3%
Prenatal care is important to my health during pregnancy. 1/6.7% 0/0% 1/6.7% 2/13.3% 11/73.3%
My baby is going to be born without complications whether or not I go to
the doctor.1/6.7% 0/0% 6/40% 3/20% 5/33.3%
Going to the doctor improves my baby’s likelihood of survival. 3/20% 1/6.7% 1/6.7% 1/6.7% 9/60%
Going to the doctor has no effect on my baby. 8/53.3% 2/13.3% 1.6.7% 2/13.3% 2/13.3%
Certain illnesses can be prevented by seeking prenatal care. 2/13.3% 0/0% 1/6.7% 1/6.7% 11/73.3%
It will be easy for me to keep my prenatal appointments. 3/13.3% 0/0% 0/0% 1/6.7% 11/73.3%
It will not be easy for me to go to the doctor for prenatal care. 8/53.3% 3/20% 1/6.7% 2/13.3% 1/6.7%
Whenever I’m ill, no matter how mild the symptoms, I take it seriously. 7/46.7% 1/6.7% 2/13.3% 1/6.7% 4/26.7%
Whenever my baby is ill, no matter how mild the symptoms, I take it
seriously. 2/13.3% 1/6.7% 0/0% 2/13.3% 10/66.7%
Health Belief TrendsResults in the context of the health belief model:
83.4%(n=12.5) perceived susceptibility for themselves and their baby
90%(n=13.5) perceived the benefits of prenatal care
56.7%(n=8.5) perceived severity
73.2% perceived no barriers
Based on these numbers, it is important to focus on:
Increasing awareness of severity by specifying consequences of the risk and the condition
Removing identified barriers
Evaluation of Reasons for Seeking Prenatal Care
Reason for Seeking Prenatal Care 1 2 3 4 5
I get to meet other pregnant women. 6/46.2% 2/15.4% 2/15.4% 1/7.7% 2/15.4%
I learn about changes in my body. 1/7.7% 0/0% 0/0% 0/0% 12/92.3%
I learn how my baby is doing. 0/0% 0/0% 0/0% 0/0% 13/100%
I get to talk with someone about my
pregnancy.7/53.8% 1/7.7% 1/7.7% 0/0% 4/30.8%
I learn better health habits, such as better
eating and exercise.0/0% 0/0% 1/7.7% 0/0% 12/92.3%
I learn about the labor and delivery process. 5/38.5% 0/0% 1/7.7% 1/7.7% 6/46.2%
Most and Least Important Reasons for Seeking Prenatal Care
Top reasons for seeking prenatal care:
Learning how the fetus is doing, learning better health habits, and learning about changes in the mother’s body
Less important reasons for seeking prenatal care:
Being able to talk about pregnancy
Learning about labor and delivery process (if multipara)
Future Prenatal Care
All participants said that they would seek prenatal care in the future
The reasons given were as follows: 26.7%(n=4) gave no reason, 40%(n=6), claimed that it was best for the baby’s health, and 33.3%(n=5) stated that it was necessary for both mother and baby’s health
Comments on Prenatal Care
“Prenatal care is too expensive in the United States.”
“Nurses can be rude and racist. I felt very judged and uncomfortable.”
“Put God first because He can take care of all of your health needs.”
“Someone made an error when they were closing up my belly after my C-section.”
Limitations
Small sample size
Interviews conducted by members of the health care community
Use of translators
Implications for Further Research
Expand to larger sample size
Compare health beliefs with other immigrants in northwest Arkansas
Compare results with other Marshallese populations
Reason behind choice of prenatal care location
Reason why do not have a regular health care provider
AcknowledgmentsSandy Hainline and the Washington County Health Department
Melisa Laelan
Dr. Marianne Neighbors and the Eleanor Mann School of Nursing
Ling Ting from the University of Arkansas
Marshallese community
• Bronstein, J., Lomatsch, C., Fletcher, D., Wooten, T., Lin, T. M., Nugent, R., & Lowery, C. (2009). Issues and biases in matching medicaid pregnancy episodes to vital records data: The arkansas experience. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 13(2), 250-259.
• Ceballos, M., & Palloni, A. (2010). Maternal and infant health of mexican immigrants in the USA: The effects of acculturation, duration, and selective return migration. Ethnicity & Health, 15(4), 377-396. doi:10.1080/13557858.2010.481329
• Chakrabarti, R. (2010). Therapeutic networks of pregnancy care: Bengali immigrant women in new york city. Social Science & Medicine, 71(2), 362-369.
• Choi, J. Y. (2008). Seeking health care: Marshallese migrants in hawai'i. Ethnicity & Health, 13(1), 73-92.
• Choi, J. Y. (2009). Contextual effects on health care access among immigrants: Lessons from three ethnic communities in hawaii. Social Science & Medicine, 69(8), 1261-1271.
• CIA - The World Factbook. (2011). Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/
References
• Elo, I. T., & Culhane, J. F. (2010). Variations in health and health behaviors by nativity among pregnant black women in philadelphia. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2185-2192.
• Dawkins, C., Ervin, N., Weissfel, L., & Yan, A. (1988). Health orientation, beliefs, and use of health services among minority, high-risk expectant mothers. Public Health Nursing, 5(1), 7-11. Retrieved April 19, 2009, from CINAHL.
• Fischer, Gayle (2007). Investigation of Perinatal Hepatitis B Virus Infections among Marshall Islanders Living in Washington County, Arkansas. (pp. 1-16, Rep.).
• Grewal, S. K., Bhagat, R., & Balneaves, L. G. (2008). Perinatal beliefs and practices of immigrant punjabi women living in canada. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 37(3), 290-300.
• Human capital, resources, and healthy childbearing for mexican women in a new destination immigrant community. (2010). Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21(4), 332-341
• Kartal, A., & Ozsoy, S. A. (2007). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Health Belief Model Scale in diabetic patients. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 1447-1458
References Cont’d
•Lin, M., Shieh, C., & Wang, H. (2008). Comparison between pregnant southeast Asian immigrant and Taiwanese women in terms of pregnancy knowledge, attitude toward pregnancy, medical service experiences and prenatal care behaviors. Journal of nursing research, 16(2), 97-107. Retrieved April 22, 2009, from CINAHL.
•Lippe, J., Brener, N., Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Harris, W. A., McManus, T., & Speicher, N. (2008). Youth risk behavior surveillance -- pacific island united states territories, 2007. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 57(-12), 28-56.
•Loue, S., Cooper, M., & Lloyd, L. S. (2005). Welfare and immigration reform and use of prenatal care among women of mexican ethnicity in san diego, california. Journal of Immigrant Health, 7(1), 37-44.
•McLafferty, S., & Grady, S. (2005). Immigration and geographic access to prenatal clinics in brooklyn, NY: A geographic information systems analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 95(4), 638-640.
•Mikhail, B. I. (1999). Perceived impediments to prenatal care among low-income women. Western journal of nursing research, 21(3), 335-350. Retrieved April 20, 2009, from CINAHL.
•Perreira, K. M., & Cortes, K. E. (2006). Race/ethnicity and nativity differences in alcohol and tobacco use during pregnancy. American Journal of Public Health, 96(9), 1629-1636.
References Cont’d
• Raube, K., Handler, A., & Rosenberg, D. (1998). Measuring satisfaction among low-income women: a prenatal care questionnaire. Maternal and child health journal, 2(1), 25-33.
• Reitmanova, S., & Gustafson, D. L. (2008). " They can't understand it": Maternity health and care needs of immigrant muslim women in st. john's, newfoundland. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 12(1), 101-111.
• RMI Homepage. (2005). Retrieved February 28, 2011, from http://www.rmiembassyus.org/index.htm
• Schempf, A. H., Mendola, P., Hamilton, B. E., Hayes, D. K., & Makuc, D. M. (2010). Perinatal outcomes for asian, native hawaiian, and other pacific islander mothers of single and multiple race/ethnicity: California and hawaii, 2003-2005. American Journal of Public Health, 100(5), 877-887. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.177345
• Stout, A. E. (1997). Prenatal Care for Low-Income Women and the Health Belief Model: A New Beginning. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 14(3), 169-180.
• Suzuki, K., Motohashi, Y., & Kaneko, Y. (2006). Factors associated with the reproductive health risk behavior of high school students in the republic of the marshall islands. Journal of School Health, 76(4), 138-144
• Teagle, S. E., & Brindis, C. D. (1998). Perceptions of motivators and barriers to public prenatal care among first-time and follow-up adolescent patients and their providers. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 2(1), 15-24.
References Cont’d
• Voetsch, D., & Chideya, S. (2006). Epi-Aid #2006-29 Final Trip Report: Investigation of the public health burden of certain reportable diseases (tuberculosis, Hansen's disease, syphilis, perinatal hepatitis B, and HIV) among Marshall Islanders-Northwest Arkansas (pp. 1-38, Rep.).
• Weeks, S. (2007). Summary of CDC Epi-Aid Findings & Recommendations, plus Attachments (pp. 1-6, Rep.).
• Williams, D., & Hampton, A. (2005). Barriers to health services perceived by Marshallese immigrants. Journal of Immigrant Health, 7(4), 317-326. Retrieved March 22, 2009, from CINAHL.
References Cont’d