ATR 42-300 01-2004

ATR 42-300/-320 - Work-horses for Regional Air Transport - January 2004 - Page 1

AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

DC/E 2493/02January 2004

ATR 42-300/-320Work-horses for

Regional Air Transport


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Contents

■ ATR Program Overview ……………………….. 4

■ Worldwide success ……………………………… 11

■ ATR 42 outstanding features ………….……….. 19

■ Weights and Performance………………………. 37

■ Cargo capability …...…………………………… 51

■ Economics: improving the bottom line ……….. 57

■ Maintenance …………………………………….. 63

■ Customer Support ……………………………... 73

■ Conclusion ……………………………………….. 82


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20EADS GroupThe World’s First Transnational Aerospace Company

Military AircraftMilitary Aircraft

EurocopterEurocopter

SocataSocata

Sogerma/EFWSogerma/EFW

50%50%

Military Transp.Aircraft

Military Transp.Aircraft Space SystemsSpace Systems Defence &

Civil SystemsDefence &

Civil SystemsStrategic

CoordinationStrategic

CoordinationAeronauticsAeronauticsAirbusAirbus

Airbus SCE

Airbus SCE

Airbus SCE

Airbus SCE

Arianespace

Arianespace

DassaultAviationDassaultAviation

ATRATR

EADS 2002 main figures■ Orders Eur 31.0 Bn (US$ 32.20 Bn)■ Orders Backlog Eur 168.3 Bn(US$ 174.70 Bn)■ Revenues Eur 29.9 Bn (US$ 31.09 Bn)■ Workforce 104,000


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Finmeccanica GroupItaly’s Largest Producer of High Technology

Combat AircraftCombat Aircraft

Military TransportAircraft

Military TransportAircraft

Commercial aircraft

Commercial aircraft

AerostructuresAerostructures

HelicoptersHelicopters ElectronicDefence Sys.Electronic

Defence Sys.Underwater

SystemsUnderwater

SystemsSpaceSpace WeaponsSystems

WeaponsSystems Transport.Transport. EnergyEnergy ITIT

Eurofighter 19%

Eurofighter 19%

CommuterCommuter 50%50% ATRATR

AERONAUTICA

Finmeccanica 2002main figures■ Orders Eur 8.69 Bn (US$ 9.04 Bn)■ Orders Backlog Eur 21.70 Bn (US$ 22.57 Bn)■ Revenues Eur 7.81Bn (US$ 8.12 Bn)■ Workforce 44,960


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR Integrated Company

Design, Engineering, Final Assembly Line, Purchasing, Marketing,Sales and Customer Support activities benefit from the expertise

of two European leading aircraft manufacturers, EADS and Alenia.

Design, Engineering, Final Assembly Line, Purchasing, Marketing,Sales and Customer Support activities benefit from the expertise

of two European leading aircraft manufacturers, EADS and Alenia.

C U S T O M E R S

ATR Shareholders

50%50%

50%50%

80%80% 100%100%

AERONAUTICA

01-001/31-02


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Industrial Organization


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR Family Evolution

StretchStretch New Generation

Maximum

commonality

1985 ATR 42-300PW 1204 blades 14SF5

1987 ATR 42-320PW 121

4 blades 14SF5“ Hot & high”

1995 ATR 42-500New engine :PW 127E

New 6-blade 568F propellerNew interiors - Advanced

soundproofing techniques“ Hot & high”

1989 ATR 72-200PW 124B

4 blades 14SF11

1992 ATR 72-210PW 127

4 blades 247F“ Hot & high” - Short runway

1997 ATR 72-500PW 127F

New 6-blade 568F propellerNew interiors - Advanced

soundproofing techniques

01-008/31-02


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20The ATR Family: Unmatched Versatility

■ Rough field version

■ Cargo version ■ Maritime Patrol version

■ Corporate version

01-009/31-02

■ Passenger version


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

ATR 42WorldwideSuccess


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Product Attractiveness

ATR is the only regional aircraft manufacturerranked in the TOP 10 Operator’s Poll*

* Airfinance Journal, October 2003

ATR Family:The Reference for


ATR Family:The Reference for


The annualInvestors’ andOperators’ Poll byAirfinance Journal,based on large asample of seniormanagement atairlines, lessors,banks and otherfinancial investors,ranked aircraft typeson the basis of fivecriteria:

Investor appeal

Residual value

Remarketability

Value for money

Operationalsuccess.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Product Attractiveness

ATR Family, best value for money!ATR Family, best value for money!

* Airfinance Journal, November 2003

ATR 72

2

2003 Operators’ PollCategory Regional Aircraft*

ATR 42

1

“The big surprise in theRegional Category is thestrong showing of ATRaircraft. (…) airlines likeoperating them…”*

Voted best aircraft

by Operatorsin its category*

Voted best aircraft

by Operatorsin its category*


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20The ATR Family : Worldwide Success

Asia PacificNorth America

Europe

Africa & Middle-East

Firm orders - Dec. 2003

LatinAmerica

188188 282282

4141 5454

108108

Total ATR family673 Ordered a/c

from 87 Customersof which:

83 ATR 42-500114 ATR 72-500

Total ATR family673 Ordered a/c

from 87 Customersof which:

83 ATR 42-500114 ATR 72-500


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

01-013/31-02

AMERICAN AIRLINES

THAI AIRWAYS

AIR FRANCE AIR NEW ZEALAND KLM FINNAIR

BRITISH AIRWAYS

ALITALIA CONTINENTAL A/L

LUFTHANSA

ATR, the Major’s Favorite


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Breakdown of Orders

By Region By Variant

42%

28%

8% 6%

Europe

NorthAmerica

LatinAmerica

16%

Australasia/ Far East

Africa/Middle East

55%45%

ATR 42ATR 72


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20The ATR Family: Customer Preference

Sales since launch

■ Dash 8-Q300/-Q400 308

■ ATR 42/72 673

ATR : Worldwide recognition as the most successful turboprop family inthe regional market, by far the leader in the 40-70 seats category.

ATR : Worldwide recognition as the most successful turboprop family inthe regional market, by far the leader in the 40-70 seats category.

Sales since launch

■ Dash 8-Q400 101

■ ATR 72 301

Dash 8-Q300/Q400

30%

ATR 42/7270%

Dash 8-Q40024%

ATR 7276%


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20FEAMA 2003 Market Consensus(20 Years Regional Aircraft Delivery Forecast)

20-99 seat RJ’s : 5,712 a/c

15-89 seat turboprops: 1,047 a/c

Average annual delivery rate : 338 a/c

Turboprops Delivery Units per year: about 52 a/c

of which 80% in the 40-70 seats category(44 a/c per year)

20-99 seat RJ’s : 5,712 a/c

15-89 seat turboprops: 1,047 a/c

Average annual delivery rate : 338 a/c

Turboprops Delivery Units per year: about 52 a/c

of which 80% in the 40-70 seats category(44 a/c per year)

Turboprops will continue to play a vital role in the regional transport market.Turboprops will continue to play a vital role in the regional transport market.

Total of 6,759 a/c in the 15-99 seats categoryof which 15% (1,047 A/C) are turboprops.

Note: The FEAMA members include all the most important European airframes, engines, systems manufacturers and suppliers (extended as well to non-European as Bombardier and Embraer).


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

ATR 42OustandingFeatures


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42The Reference in the Regional MarketTransport

■ Since its introduction into service in December 1985, the ATR 42 hasbecome a reference in the regional air transport industry for reliability andprofitability and is now a best seller in its market segment.

■ The ATR 42 is remarkably simple to operate and to maintain and is equippedwith efficient, low-fuel-burn engines.

■ Its operating costs are 15%-20% lower than those of its competitors.

■ The basic ATR 42-300 is fitted with two PW120 engines rated at 2,000shpeach

■ The ATR 42-320, fitted with two PW121 engines rated at 2,100 shp each,has been developed to offer increased performance for hot and highconditions and short runway operations.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

7.59

m(

24' 1

1")

24.57 m( 80' 7")

22.67 m( 74' 5")

8.78 m( 28' 10")

7.31

m(

24')

4.10 m( 13' 5")

8.10 m( 26' 7")

0.82 m( 2' 8")

Ø 3.96 m( 13' )

ATR 42General ArrangementLow loading sill (1.2m)Low loading sill (1.2m) Optimized propeller-

fuselage clearanceOptimized propeller-fuselage clearance

Dimensions

Passenger door 0.75 x 1.75 m 29.5 x 68.9 in

Forward cargo door 1.275 x 1.53 m 50.2 x 60.2 in

Overall length 22.67 m 74 ft 5 in

Wing span 24.57 m 80 ft 7 in

Height 7.59 m 24 ft 11 in

Perfectly suited to operationson narrow runways

Perfectly suited to operationson narrow runways

Wing area:54.5 sq.m (586 sq.ft)

Wing area:54.5 sq.m (586 sq.ft)


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Space and Efficiency

■ With its bi-lobed fuselage, the ATR has the largest cross-section among newgeneration aircraft with four-abreast passenger seating

■ The cross-section is constant throughout the passenger cabin area

■ The wide aisle (18” - 0.457 m) and stand-up headroom of 1.91m providescontinued comfort for passengers on a regional service connecting with widebody jets.

■ Large overhead luggage bins are provided allowing more carry-on bags inresponse to passengers increasing desire to avoid luggage check-in.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42 CabinMaking the best use of available space

■ The flexible ATR interior offers a wide range of options in terms of seating capacity, galleyconfigurations and cargo compartments.

■ The different layouts enable the fleets to be adapted to the traffic, in-flight service quality andfreight transport requirements.

■ The standard cabin layout is 48 seats at 30 inch pitch. The dimensions of the front cargocompartment can be adapted to accommodate 50-seat and 46-seat configurations at 30 inchpitch.

Main features are:

■ A rear left door including an integrated stair for passenger embarkment/disembarkme

■ A rear right service door used for galley servicing and loading of the 4.8m3 (169.5 cu.ft) rearcargo compartment

■ A front cargo compartment which can be easily loaded through a dedicated cargo door.Depending on the cabin configuration, its volume can vary from 3.6 m3 (127 cu.ft) to 6m3

(212 cu.ft).


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42 Cabin Cross-SectionSpace and Comfort

Wide floor, wide aisle, wide elbow roomWide floor, wide aisle, wide elbow room


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

ED

ED

ED

CD

1.8 m3

63.5 cu.ft

SD

1.8 m3

63.5 cu.ft

A

T

B

B

B

▲

▲

▲

▲

GS

85 cu.ft2.4 m3

▲

▲▲CD

▲SD

A

G

T

B

B 3 m3

106 cu.ft

B

BS

85 cu.ft

2.4 m3

3 m3

106 cu.ft

▲

▲▲

CD

1.8 m3

63.5 cu.ft

▲SD

A

T

B

B 3 m3

106 cu.ft

B

BGS

85 cu.ft2.4 m3

ATR 42 Cabin Layout Flexibilitywith 2.4 m3 (85 cu.ft) rear cargo compartment & A type Galley*

46 seatsat 30” pitch


* The ATR 42s with MSN below 116 (except MSN 109 and 113) are fitted with a rear cargo compartment volumeof 2.4m3 (85 cu.ft).



AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

3 m3

106 cu.ft

▲

▲

ED

169.5 cu.ft

▲

CD

▲SD

4.8 m33 m3

106 cu.ft

A

GS

T

B

B

B

3 m3

106 cu.ft

▲

▲

ED

169.5 cu.ft

▲

CD

1.8 m3

63.5 cu.ft

▲SD

4.8 m3

A

GS

T

B

B

B

▲

▲

ED

169.5 cu.ft

▲

CD

1.8 m3

63.5 cu.ft

▲SD

4.8 m3

1.8 m3

63.5 cu.ft

A

GS

T

B

B

B




ATR 42 Cabin Layout Flexibilitywith 4.8 m3 (169.5 cu.ft) standard rear cargo compartment & A type galley


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42 Volumes

Baggagecompartment

Baggage perpax

Total baggageIncluding overhead

bins & stowage

Total baggageper pax

Rear Cargo MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116

m310.8 8.4 0.235 0.183 12.7 10.3 0.276 0.224

46 pax cu.ft 381.5 296.5 8.29 6.45 448.5 363.5 9.75 7.941m3

9.6 7.2 0.200 0.150 11.55 9.15 0.241 0.19148 pax cu.ft 339 254.5 7.06 5.30 408 323 8.50 6.73

m38.4 6 0.168 0.120 10.4 8 0.208 0.160

50 pax cu.ft 296.5 212 5.93 4.24 367.5 282.5 7.35 5.65

Baggagecompartment

Baggage perpax

Total baggageIncluding overhead

bins & stowage

Total baggageper pax

Rear Cargo MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116 MSN=116

m310.8 8.4 0.235 0.183 12.7 10.3 0.276 0.224

46 pax cu.ft 381.5 296.5 8.29 6.45 448.5 363.5 9.75 7.941m3

9.6 7.2 0.200 0.150 11.55 9.15 0.241 0.19148 pax cu.ft 339 254.5 7.06 5.30 408 323 8.50 6.73

m38.4 6 0.168 0.120 10.4 8 0.208 0.160

50 pax cu.ft 296.5 212 5.93 4.24 367.5 282.5 7.35 5.65

MSN⊇116 MSN⊆116 MSN⊇116 MSN⊆116 MSN⊇116 MSN⊆116 MSN⊇116 MSN⊆116


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

A type galley (A01/11) (basic on ATR 42)

1 half size trolley equipped with 6 standard drawers

W aste

A01/11 equipment (basic on ATR 42)

S

S

W1/2 T

2 H/J

2 hot jugs

3 standard units each equipped with 2 standard drawers

S/U

S/U

Provision for two hot jugs, one half size trolley,

and three standard units

S

S/U

Basic ATR 42 A type galley (A01/11)


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42

Weights andPerformance


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Lower Weights for Increased Efficiency

ATR 42 secondary structure is extensively made of composite material,which are not subject to corrosion.

The in-service advantages of composites are numerous:■ Immunity to corrosion and fatigue■ Reduction of inspection■ Payload gain and fuel savings.

Not including the commercial furnishing weight, the corresponding result forthe ATR 42 can be summarized as follows:

= 14%

Weight saving 190 kg = equivalent to 2 pax

Composite

Total structure


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42Composite Materials

Cabin floor panels: Kevlar/Nomex sandwichPropeller blades: Fibreglass/polyurethane foam/aluminum spar


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42-300 & ATR 42-320Weights & Loadings

* In retrofit through application of Service Bulletin ATR 42-08-0003: aircraft with MSN<70 will be subject to a VMO reduction down to 230 kt; for other aircraft the VMO remains at 250 kt.

Basic Option*

Maximum Ramp weight 16,720 kg 36,681 lb 17,070 kg 37,632 lb

Maximum take-off weight 16,700 kg 36,817 lb 16,900 kg 37,258 lb

Maximum landing weight 16,400 kg 36,155 lb 16,400 kg 36,155 lb

Max zero fuel weight 15,200 kg 33,510 lb 15,540 kg 34,260 lb

OEW (at spec. def) 10,285 kg 22,674 lb 10,285 kg 22,674 lb

OEW (with typical options) 10,600 kg 23,369 lb 10,600 kg 23,369 lb

Maximum payload 4,600 kg 10,141 lb 4,940 kg 10,891 lb

Maximum fuel load 4,500 kg 9,921 lb 4,500 kg 9,921 lb

Basic Option*

Maximum Ramp weight 16,720 kg 36,681 lb 17,070 kg 37,632 lb

Maximum take-off weight 16,700 kg 36,817 lb 16,900 kg 37,258 lb

Maximum landing weight 16,400 kg 36,155 lb 16,400 kg 36,155 lb

Max zero fuel weight 15,200 kg 33,510 lb 15,540 kg 34,260 lb

OEW (at spec. def) 10,285 kg 22,674 lb 10,285 kg 22,674 lb

OEW (with typical options) 10,600 kg 23,369 lb 10,600 kg 23,369 lb

Maximum payload 4,600 kg 10,141 lb 4,940 kg 10,891 lb

Maximum fuel load 4,500 kg 9,921 lb 4,500 kg 9,921 lb


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42 Powered by PW100 Family Engines

Main technical characteristics■ Two centrifugal compressors■ Free turbine, three concentric shafts■ Electronic and hydromechanical controls

Advantages■ Simple, economic, easy to maintain■ Low specific fuel consumption■ Compliance with todays and future noise levels regulations

Perfectly adaptedto commuter requirements

Perfectly adaptedto commuter requirements


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42-300/320Powerplant

PW 120/121

Take-off Power (one engine out) 2,000/2,100 SHP

Propeller (Hamilton Standard) - 4 blades 14SF5


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Propeller Brake Principle

■ The ATR aircraft benefit from an economicand efficient concept: the Hotel Mode.

■ The right hand engine is equipped with apropeller brake installed on the reductiongear box.

■ Used only on the ground, this brake locksthe propeller while, thanks to the three-concentric shaft design of the engine, theLP/HP spools continue to run providingthe aircraft with electrical DC power andbleed air for the air conditioning system.

Hotel Mode provides all the facilities and all the benefits of an APU at a fraction of thecost and with less weight, offering to the operators a greater operational flexibility.

Hotel Mode provides all the facilities and all the benefits of an APU at a fraction of thecost and with less weight, offering to the operators a greater operational flexibility.

Hotel Mode

62-001/31-02


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Hotel Mode/APU Comparison

The propeller brake represents the best compromise for theoperators because:

■ It is lighter than the APU.

■ It is economic

■ It can be maintained at low cost.

■ It has no effect on the engine life at ground idle.

■ It is installed as basic fit on the ATR 42 and ATR 72.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Propeller Brake vs APUSavings with a Propeller Brake

Assumptions- 1500 cycles per year, average cycle 15 min- Fuel price 0.7$ per US gal.- APU amortization: 10 years, no residual value- No allowance for APU weight induced extra fuel consumption or payload reduction

Propeller Brake ground idle utilization APU (rear mounted)

Weight 22 lb (basic on ATR) 330 to 400 lb

C.G. No effect Loading constraints

Acquisition cost Basic on ATR 275,000 US $

Fuel consumption 240 lb/hr 210 lb/hr

Maintenance cost 1.6 $/cycle 4.87 $/cycle(*)

Yearly cost 11,800 US$ 43,000 US$

Savings with a propeller brake: -31,200 US$ annually/aircraft

Propeller Brake ground idle utilization APU (rear mounted)

Weight 22 lb (basic on ATR) 330 to 400 lb

C.G. No effect Loading constraints

Acquisition cost Basic on ATR 275,000 US $

Fuel consumption 240 lb/hr 210 lb/hr

Maintenance cost 1.6 $/cycle 4.87 $/cycle(*)

Yearly cost 11,800 US$ 43,000 US$

Savings with a propeller brake: -31,200 US$ annually/aircraft


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42Performance

* MTOW = 16,700 kg ( 36,817 lb )

ATR 42-300 (PW120) ATR 42-320 (PW121)

Balanced take-off F.L. 1,090 m 3,575 ft 1,040 m 3,410 ftISA - Sea level - MTOW*

Balanced take-off F.L. 1,300 m 4,265 ft 1,235 m 4,050 ftISA + 10° - 3000 ft - MTOW*

Landing Field Length 1,030 m 3,380 ft 1,030 m 3,380 ftSea level - MLW

Gross single engine ceiling 4,280 m 14,040 ft 4,880 m 16,015 ft97% MTOW* - ISA +10°C

Max cruise speed 265 kt 269 kt97% MTOW* - ISA - 17,000 ft

ATR 42-300 (PW120) ATR 42-320 (PW121)

Balanced take-off F.L. 1,090 m 3,575 ft 1,040 m 3,410 ftISA - Sea level - MTOW*

Balanced take-off F.L. 1,300 m 4,265 ft 1,235 m 4,050 ftISA + 10° - 3000 ft - MTOW*

Landing Field Length 1,030 m 3,380 ft 1,030 m 3,380 ftSea level - MLW

Gross single engine ceiling 4,280 m 14,040 ft 4,880 m 16,015 ft97% MTOW* - ISA +10°C

Max cruise speed 265 kt 269 kt97% MTOW* - ISA - 17,000 ft


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

ATR 42-300/320 MTOW 16,900 kg (37,258 lb)MZFW 15,540 kg (34,260 lb)

ATR 42-300/320MTOW 16,700 kg (36,817 lb) MZFW 15,200 kg (33,510 lb)

48 pax & baggage

ATR 42-300/ATR 42-320Payload/Range Capability

ISA ConditionsReserves:Alternate: 87 NMHolding 45’ Continued cruisePass. & baggage 95 kg (209 lb)

Payload (kg)

Range (NM) 630 NM


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42-500 - PW127EBlock Fuel & Block Time on typical sectors

295 kg (650 lb)32 min

497 kg (1,095 lb)56 min

The most efficient compromisebetween low fuel consumption and speed

The most efficient compromisebetween low fuel consumption and speed

200 NM Stage200 NM Stage

100 NM Stage100 NM Stage


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

32-012/31-02

The ATR Family: Unrestricted Operations

■ ETOPS capability

■ Operations from airfields located at up to11,000 ft altitude

■ Stretcher transportation capability

■ Extreme cold weather certification (-52°C)

■ Steep approach capability with performance creditfor operations on very short runways (800 -1,000m)

■ Unpaved runways certification (laterite, soil,gravel, grass)

■ Narrow runways operations, down to 14m width.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

Cargo Capability


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR: The Best Cargo Platform

The ATR 42 is well suited to perform freighttransport missions through its basic flexibilityas illustrated by:

■ Standard cargo door: 1.275 x 1.53 m(50.2” x 60.2”), openable either from inside oroutside■ Low loading sill (1.12 m)■ Quick change option available:- Class E compartment capability- Total reinforced floor (400 kg/m²)- Passenger seats easily removable- Forward partition easily removable- Smoke detection extension in cabin

The ATR platform is suitable for containerizedor bulk freight

Quick change capability = Additional profit opportunitiesQuick change capability = Additional profit opportunities

CAR-001/31-02


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

4 3" 1. 0 9 m

50"

1 .2 7

m

8 3 .5 "

2 .1 2 m

ATR: Container Transport Option

• Volume: 2.8 m3 (99 cu.ft)• Max gross weight: 500 kg (1,102 lb)• Tare weight: 76 kg (168 lb)• Complies with Class I of NAS 3610 (“9g” type)

T

B

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

83"

2.10

m

455" 11.56 m

50.2" 1.27 m

423" 10.75 m

Lo cks 43" 1.09 m

1" 0.025 m

32" 0.81 m

S G 4.8 m 3 169.5 cu.ft

ATR Container Definition ATR 42 Container Installation

Total containerized volume: 25.2 m3 (891 cu.ft)+ bulk freight in the aft cargo zone (4.8 m3)

Notes- The basic attendant seat is not usable during containertransport operations- This type of operations requires the option 03-0011 (ContainerTransport Capability)- The Container Transport option requires that the cabin be, asfar as the fire protection system is concerned, class E. Class Emainly leads to extension of the existing smoke detection systemand installation of isolating valves in the air-conditioning system.This classification does not allow the use of the attendant seatduring cargo operations.

Ball mat


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

ATR 42-300/-320 ATR 72-200/-210Engines PW 120/121 PW 124B/127MTOW Standard 21,500 kgMTOW Optional 16,900 kg (1) 22,000 kg (2)

MLW 16,400 kg 21,350 kgMZFW Standard 19,700 kgMZFW Optional 15,540 kg (1) 20,000 kg (2)

OEW (typical) (3) 10,100 kg 12,050 kgMax Fuel 4,500 kg 5,000 kg

ATR 42-300/-320 ATR 72-200/-210Engines PW 120/121 PW 124B/127MTOW Standard 21,500 kgMTOW Optional 16,900 kg (1) 22,000 kg (2)

MLW 16,400 kg 21,350 kgMZFW Standard 19,700 kgMZFW Optional 15,540 kg (1) 20,000 kg (2)

OEW (typical) (3) 10,100 kg 12,050 kgMax Fuel 4,500 kg 5,000 kg

ATR QC FreighterReference Weights

1 : For MSN < 70, VMO limited at 240 kt2 : Not applicable on the 17 first ATR 72 (up to MSN 195)3: Typical weights according to second hand aircraft statistics, with overhead bins and galleyand without galley equipment.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

QC Freighter Max P/L ATR 42-300/-320 ATR 72-200/-210MZFW limited gross payload 5,440 kg 7,950 kg

Bulk - Limit of cabin nets 4,800 kg 7,200 kg

Bulk - Limit of aft cargo hold 768 kg * 768 kg

Maximum net bulk payload ** 5,395 kg 7,882 kg

Containers (net payload) 3,816 kg 5,512 kg

Bulk - Limit of aft cargo hold + 768 kg* +768 kg

QC Freighter Max P/L ATR 42-300/-320 ATR 72-200/-210MZFW limited gross payload 5,440 kg 7,950 kg

Bulk - Limit of cabin nets 4,800 kg 7,200 kg

Bulk - Limit of aft cargo hold 768 kg * 768 kg

Maximum net bulk payload ** 5,395 kg 7,882 kg

Containers (net payload) 3,816 kg 5,512 kg

Bulk - Limit of aft cargo hold + 768 kg* +768 kg

ATR QC FreighterTypical Max Payload Summary(Optional weights)

* : 384 kg por MSN<116 (small rear hold)** : Assumes SIREN kit


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

ATR 42-300/-320Payload/Range Characteristics(9 ATR Containers)

Optional weights

Basic weights

Conditions- ISA- No wind

Reserves- 45 min continuedcruise- 87 Nm alternate

Taxi: 4 minOEW: 10,950 kg

OEW includes theContainer TransportSystem and thecontainer weights.

Nm

Kg


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR Full Freighter

Full Cargo VersionThe New Standard in Regional and Feeder CargoTransport

First delivery: Farnair, Switzerland, August 2002


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Cargo CapabilityNew Opportunities - Full Freighters

In order to address the growing requirements of cargooperators for new generation, efficient regionalfreighters, ATR has launched optimized derivatives ofthe standard passenger models.■ Bulk Freighter derivative (“Tube” version) : Thisversion is an optimized solution for small parcelstransportation (best volume and payload, quick andefficient loading).■ Large Cargo Door (116”) conversionIn order to provide operators with standard ULDcompatibility (notably LD3 containers and 88” widthcontainers or pallets), a large 116” x 71” front cargodoor is now available, replacing the standard front door.Combined as required with equipment from the “Tube”concept, this version is a multi-purpose freightercapable of:- Bulk Freight transportation with improved loadingefficiency- Standard or specific pallets or containerstransportation,- Carriage of oversize loads.

LD3

88" x 108" ULD88” x 62” ULD

MTOW 16,900 kg (37,257 lb)

OEW (typical, including nets) 9,927 kg (21,885 lb)

Max net P/L 5,613 kg (12,374 lb)

Gross usable volume 56 m3 (1,978 cu.ft)

Max linear load 510 kg/m (28 lb/inch)

ATR 42-300/-320 ATR Full Freighters (Tube + LCD)

Cabin cross-section with 116” doorULD compatibility


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Capabilities - Light TubePayload optimization for dense Bulk transportation - Spider nets

■ Bulk freight with BFEspider nets

■ Maximize thepayload for densebulk transportation

■ ATR 42 maximumpayload:5,753 kg (12,683 lb)

■ ATR 72 maximumpayload:8,604 kg (18,968 lb)

The lightest and lowest cost solutionThe lightest and lowest cost solution


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Capabilities - Large Cargo DoorLoading capabilityCapabilities - Large Cargo DoorLoading capability

+ aft bulk load

5 LD3 containers5 LD3 containers

3 88”x 108” pallets3 88”x 108” pallets


7 LD3 containers7 LD3 containers



ATR 42ATR 42

ATR 72ATR 72 + aft bulk load


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR family, more and more environment friendlyCumulative noise margin (EPNdB)

ATR family is fully compliant with Chapter III regulations and more stringent airport restrictions.

EPNdB

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

ATR 42-400

ATR 42-320

ATR 42-300

ATR 42-500

EIS 1995

EIS1985

EIS 1997

EIS 1989

Quieter

Quieter

ATR 72-500

ATR 72-210

ATR 72-200

EIS: Entry into Service

All ATR models have large margins to complywith Chapter IV limits

All ATR models have large margins to complywith Chapter IV limits

EIS: Entry into service


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

Economics:Improving the Bottom Line


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Cost Effectiveness

Operators worldwide unanimously associate ATR 42 withprofitability.Thanks to its low operating costs and high reliability, ATRaircraft have played a major role in the development of manyAirlines.

Advanced technology has been the key factor in reducingoperating costs to a minimum:

■ Low fuel consumption■ High maintainability■ Maximum commonality, as part of a family of aircraft.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Assumptions200 Nm sector

European groundrules US groundrules

Block time (min) 56.0

Block fuel (kg) 497

Time allowances (min)* 7.3

Utilization (BH/year) 2,200 2,400

Pax 48

Fuel price ($/US gal) 0.80 0.70

Charges (navigation, landing, parking) (landing, parking)

Crew costs ($/BH)

- Cabin 35 20

- Cockpit statistical statistical

Labour costs ($/MH) Line: 25 - Shop: 63

* Start, taxi, take-off, approach and landing

European groundrules US groundrules

Block time (min) 56.0

Block fuel (kg) 497

Time allowances (min)* 7.3

Utilization (BH/year) 2,200 2,400

Pax 48

Fuel price ($/US gal) 0.80 0.70

Charges (navigation, landing, parking) (landing, parking)

Crew costs ($/BH)

- Cabin 35 20

- Cockpit statistical statistical

Labour costs ($/MH) Line: 25 - Shop: 63

* Start, taxi, take-off, approach and landing


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42Cash DOC/Trip200 Nm sector

US groundrules

Maintenance- Airframe $/trip 122- Engine $/trip 94

Crew- Cockpit $/trip 94- Cabin $/trip 19

Landing/parking charges $/trip 86

Fuel $/trip 115

Cash DOC/trip $/trip 531

Cash DOC/ASM ¢/ASM 5.53

Cash DOC is 53% of the total DOC/trip.47% are investment related costs.

US groundrules



Landing/parking charges $/trip 86

Fuel $/trip 115




European groundrules



Navigation charges $/trip 174Landing/parking charges $/trip 220

Fuel $/trip 132




European groundrules



Navigation charges $/trip 174Landing/parking charges $/trip 220

Fuel $/trip 132





AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

Maintenance


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42: Designed to Ease Customer Operation

■ Excellent accessibility of mainsystems and controls

■ Systems simplicity and maximuminterchangeability of parts andmechanisms (extensive use of LRUs)

■ Reliability (built-in test equipments,maintenance panels in the cockpit)

■ Reduced maintenance working hours

The “Design to Maintain” philosophy, leading to the lowestmaintenance costs per flight hour in the market.

The “Design to Maintain” philosophy, leading to the lowestmaintenance costs per flight hour in the market.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Excellent Accessibility

Designed for

Maintenance■ Access to flight controls from cabin (hinged, quick release hat-racks)

■ Access to flight controls from cabin (hinged, quick release hat-racks)

■ Large butterfly doorsfor engine access■ Large butterfly doorsfor engine access

■ Avionics, electrics and batteries in racksbehind pilots

■ Avionics, electrics and batteries in racksbehind pilots

■ Air conditioningpacks■ Air conditioningpacks

■ Hydraulic bay■ Hydraulic bay ■ Rear bay (CVR, DFDR, flight controls)■ Rear bay (CVR, DFDR, flight controls)


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

98,4

98,6

98,8

99,0

99,2

99,4

99,6

99,8

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

ATR 42 ATR 42-500 ATR 72 ATR 72-500

Dispatch ReliabilityWorld fleet (15 mn WATOG)


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42Basic Inspection Frame

■ Line - Line check (2 calendar days)- Weekly check (7 days) Tasks performed: zonal visual inspections, operational checks and servicing.

■ A checks - Every 500 FHTasks performed: zonal visual inspections, B.I.T.E. checks, operational checkslubrication and servicing

■ C checks - Every 4000 FHTasks performed: zonal visual inspections, operational and functional checks ofaircraft and powerplant systems

■ Structural inspections- Environmental damage- Fatigue damage

Tasks performed: general and detailed visual inspections, special detailed inspections


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42Structural Inspections

■ Environmental damage (corrosion)- Thresholds: 2, 4 and 8 years- Repeat intervals: 2, 4 and 8 years

■ Fatigue damage- Thresholds: 18,000, 24,000 and 36,000 flights- Repeat intervals: 3,000, 6,000, 9,000, 12,000, 18,000 and 24,000 flights


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR A ChecksZonal visual checks, bite checks, lubrication, servicing, operational tests

Manhours quoted account for unscheduled work.

2,000 FH/Year2,000 FL/Year

0MH

20MH

40MH

60MH

80MH

100MH

120MH

1A 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 8A


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

Manhours quoted accunt for unscheduled work.

2,000 FH/Year2,000 FL/Year

0MH

50MH

100MH

150MH

200MH

250MH

1C 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C

ATR C ChecksZonal visual inspections, operational and functional test ofaircraft and powerplant systems


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Engine Maintenance Programme

■ On condition

No scheduled HSI / OVH. Engine removal for refurbishment driven by onwing tasks and ECTM (Trend Monitoring)


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Major Inspection Intervals

The following Majors Inspection Intervals have been approvedfor the ATR 42-300/-320:

■ PW 120/121 engine TBO 8,000 FH

■ 14SF-5 propeller TBO 10,000 FH (10,500 FH objective)

■ Landing gear TBO 18,000 cycles or 8 years providedthat six SB are incorporated

■ Aircraft structure 8 years and 36,000 cycles


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20ATR 42-300Direct Maintenance Cost

■ 2,000 FH/year, 1 H flight■ A checks 500 FH interval■ C checks 4,000 FH

interval

■ PW 120 engine, on-conditionmaintenance

■ 14SF5 prop.,10,000 FH TBO

■ Labour rates :In-house $ 25Subcontracted $ 63

■ 100 % rotables subcont.■ Economic conditions Jan 03■ Budgetary figures

Note :DMC figures are only related to costs of partsand labour necessary to maintain the aircraftand its components in a serviceablecondition. DMC figures exclude capitalinvestment in facilities, spares inventory andthe associated financial burden.

LabourMH/FH

0.12550.16660.03940.1268

0.4583

0.0534N/AN/AN/AN/A

Line ChecksA checksC checks

Struct. Insp.

On-Aircraft Total

Wheels, Brakes & TyresRotables

Landing GearEngines

Propellers

Off-Aircraft Total

TOTAL

Material$/FH

$0.41$9.28$5.28$7.47

$22.44

$8.53$65.62$11.80

$112.82$6.53

Total$/FH

$3.54$13.44$6.27

$10.64

$33.90

$9.87$65.62$11.80

$112.82$6.53

$206.64

$240.54


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

Line ChecksA checksC checks

Struct. Insp.

On-Aircraft Total

Wheels, Brakes & TyresRotables

Landing GearEngines

Propellers

Off-Aircraft Total

TOTAL

LabourMH/FH

0.12550.16660.03940.1268

0.4583

0.0534N/AN/AN/AN/A

Material$/FH

$0.41$9.28$5.28$7.47

$22.44

$8.53$65.62$11.80

$115.59$6.53

Total$/FH

$3.54$13.44$6.27

$10.64

$33.90

$9.87$65.62$11.80

$115.59$6.53

$209.41

$243.31

ATR 42-320Direct Maintenance Cost

■ 2,000 FH/year, 1 H flight■ A checks 500 FH interval■ C checks 4,000 FH

interval

■ PW 120 engine, on-conditionmaintenance

■ 14SF5 prop.,10,000 FH TBO

■ Labour rates :In-house $ 25Subcontracted $ 63

■ 100 % rotables subcont.■ Economic conditions Jan 03■ Budgetary figures

Note :DMC figures are only related to costs of partsand labour necessary to maintain the aircraftand its components in a serviceablecondition. DMC figures exclude capitalinvestment in facilities, spares inventory andthe associated financial burden.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

Customer Support


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Customer Support

Washington

ToulouseHead Office

Spares Logistic CentreATR Training Centre

Singapore


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Training Centres

Flight SafetyHouston

2 FFS

ATRToulouse

3 FFS

AMR EagleDallas1 FFS

BritairMorlaix1 FFS

FinnairHelsinki1 FFS

Flight SafetyAtlanta1 FFS

OrbitBangkok

1 FFS

OlympicThessalonica

1 FFS


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Technical Support Engineering

Integrated Engineering Environmentat no cost for the Operators

Integrated Engineering Environmentat no cost for the Operators

Composed by Systems, Structural, TechnicalPublications & Maintenance Engineers.

Permanent, 24 hours a day Service


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20World-wide … Around the Clock

SingaporeSingapore

ToulouseToulouse

WashingtonWashington

■ Capability to ship any part, anywhere, immediately 24 hours a day

■ Spares specialists available 24 hours a day in three locations (Toulouse, Washington, Singapore)


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

Availability of parts with a minimum spares investment.Guaranteed priceSimplicity through a single channel service.

AdvantagesAdvantages

GMAactual fleet coverage

GMAactual fleet coverage

83 a/c among 20 operators83 a/c among 20 operators

GMA : Global Maintenance Agreement


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

HIGH FLEXIBILITY TO COMPOSE THE GMA PACKAGE

MAKE YOUR OWN CHOICE...

TO COMPLEMENT YOUR OWNRESOURCES

Rotable On-Site StockRotable Pool AccessRotable repairs & overhaulsEngines maintenancePropellers maintenanceLanding Gears maintenanceOn-call technical assistanceOther specific services...

Single Channel with a GMA


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20LRU Repair & Pool Service

Spares Pool Service gives access toexchange services for IMMEDIATEreplenishment of the airline stock.Over 240 P/Ns can be covered.Approved

Repair Station

ATRPool store

Airline

1

2

3

4


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20Conclusion

With 15 years of in-service experience, the ATR 42 has proved to be avery reliable, and cost efficient aircraft.

Its 65% market share in the 40-50 seat turboprop market makes theATR 42 the number 1 in its category and the increasingly largecustomer base is the best evidence of how well the aircraft isappreciated around the world.

When operating used ATR 42 aircraft, airlines benefit from the widerange of customized Support services developed by the CustomerSupport Centers in Toulouse, Washington and Singapore, with aspecial attention being offered to new ATR operators.

Buying or leasing used ATR 42 aircraft is also joining a whole familyconcept with proven solutions for long term airline development,towards larger capacity with the ATR 72, or higher performance andcomfort with the new -500 series.


AT

R 4

2-30

0/-3

20

Documents

ATR 42-300 01-2004