Associate professor of the Department of Geography and Nature … · 2017-12-22 · а. – bstructure of the hydrographic network . ... P2 b14 r2 B18 K10 B20 B2 b3 S2 m6 b6 M8 lg3

Western Bug basin: physico-geographical

conditions, water formation, economic

development (on the example of the transboundary

part of the basin)

Dr. Aleh TAKARCHUK

Associate professor of the Department of Geography

and Nature Management

of A.S. Pushkin Brest State University

International Public Association «EKAPRAEKT»,

Brest office, Chairman

ADDRESSING COMMON CHALLENGES OF THE BALTIC

SEA BASIN BY WORKING ON INTEGRATED RIVER BASIN

MANAGEMENT, MICROPLASTIC & LITTER INPUTS,

Joint Projects’ Conference

Druskininkai, Lithuania, 18-19 December 2017

THE SITUATION OF THE WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN IN EUROPE

AND WITHIN THE VISTULA RIVER BASIN 1

TRANSBOUNDARY ASPECT. OBJECT AND SUBJECT OF RESEARCH

The object of the study is the transboundary part of the Western Bug River basin

The subject of the study is the territorial heterogeneity of the conditions for the formation of

surface waters, the water regime of rivers and the flow of water

2

The Western Bug river basin – 39,4 thousand km2

Transboundary part of the basin – 30,0 thousand km2

(76% from the whole area of the basin), including:

within Ukraine – 10,8 thousand km2

within Poland – 10,0 thousand km2

within Belarus – 9,2 thousand km2

Cities

(the population is more

50 000)

BELARUS

UKRAINE

POLAND

ADMINISTRATIVE TERRITORIAL ACCESSORIES TRANSBOUNDARY

PART OF THE WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN 3

BELARUS Brest region

Volyn region

UKRAINE

Lviv region

Lubelskie

Podlaskie

POLAND

Mazowieckie

Administrative Centers

The border of the transboundary part of the Western Bug River basin

PHYSICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL HETEROGENEITY

TRANSBOUNDARY PART OF THE WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN 4

BELARUS

UKRAINE POLAND

District Area

South Podlasie plain (318.9) The Lukow Plain (318.9-a)

The valley of the breakthrough of the

Western Bug River (318.9-b)

Rostock (343.2-a) Southern Rostock (343.2-a)

Western Predpolesie (841.1) The Pruzhany plain (841.1-a)

Vysokovskaya Plain (844.1-b)

Western Polesie (845.2)

The Lęčyci-Włodawa Plain (845.2-a)

Shatskaya Plain (845.2-b)

Kodenska Plain (845.2-c)

The Malorita plain (845.2-d)

Upper-Pripyat Plain (845.2-e)

The Brest Plain (845.2-f)

The Lomaz Plain (845.2-g)

The Western Bug River Valley

(845.2-h)

Volyn Polesye (845.3)

The Lyuboml plain (845.3-a)

The Helm plain (845.3-b)

The Western Bug River Valley

(845.3-c)

Small Polesye (845.7) Upper Bug plain (845.7-a)

Pobuzhskaya Hollow (845.7-b)

The Volyn Upland (851.1)

Sokal ridge (851.1-a)

Hrubieszów-Ivanicev hollow

(851.1-b)

Gorodel'sko-Sokhtchiv ridge (851.1-c)

Podil Upland (851.3) Gologoro-Voronyak Range (851.3-a)

а. – structure of the hydrographic network b. – structure of the basin

водоемы

Порядки водотоков

1 2 3 4 5

Cтруктуры бассейнового строения

элементарные водосборы

элементарные приречья

NATURAL DISTRIBUTION OF SURFACE WATER 5

watercourse orders

elementary riverine watersheds elementary watersheds

HYDROLOGICAL POSTS. FEATURES OF THE WATER FLOW 6

Hydrological posts Watershed, km2

1. Western Bug (Sasov) 107,0

2. Svinja (Zholkwa) 96,6

3. Poltva (Busk) 1440,0

4. Rata (Mezhirechye) 1740,0

5. Soloccia (Chervonograd) 931,0

6. Khuchwa (Gozduw) 1215,0

7. Luga (Vladimir-Volynsky) 1270,0

8. Uherka (Ruda Opalin) 433,0

9. Vlodavka (Okuninka) 576,0

10. channel Orekhovsky (Melenkovo) 1070,0

11. Kopayuvka (Czersk) 461,0

12. Ryta (Small Radvanichi) 968,0

13. Zeliava (Perkowice) 955,0

14. Lesnaya (Kamianets) 1920,0

15. Pulva (Vysokoje) 317,0

16. Ksna (Poryosyuki) 1210,0

Hydrological posts Watershed, km2

A. Western Bug (Kamenka Bugskaya) 2360,0

B. Western Bug (Sokal) 6250,0

C. Western Bug (Strzyzów) 8944,6

D. Western Bug (Dorohusk) 12398,7

E. Western Bug (Wlodawa) 14410,0

F. Western Bug (Kshychev) 26284,0

G. Mukhavets (Brest) 6590,0

H. Ksna (Malova Gura) 3127,7

I. Lesnaya (Tyukhinichi) 2590,0

Representative posts

Transit posts

Hydrological posts

representative transit

water flow, mm

Подольская возвышенность

Small Polesye 0,00

25,00

01.11.82 01.12.82 01.01.83 01.02.83 01.03.83 01.04.83 01.05.83 01.06.83 01.07.83 01.08.83 01.09.83 01.10.83

Q,

ку

б.

м/с

0,00

25,00

01.11.82 01.12.82 01.01.83 01.02.83 01.03.83 01.04.83 01.05.83 01.06.83 01.07.83 01.08.83 01.09.83 01.10.83

Q,

ку

б.

м/c

Volyn Upland

0,00

16,00

01.11.1982

01.12.1982

01.01.1983

01.02.1983

01.03.1983

01.04.1983

01.05.1983

01.06.1983

01.07.1983

01.08.1983

01.09.1983

01.10.1983

Q,

ку

б.

м/c

Western Polesie

0,00

4,00

01.11.1982 01.12.1982 01.01.1983 01.02.198301.03.1983 01.04.1983 01.05.1983 01.06.1983 01.07.1983 01.08.1983 01.09.1983 01.10.1983

Q,

ку

б.

м/c

Western

Predpolesie

b. – change in average monthly water discharge at hydrological stations, m3/s

а. – change in average annual water discharge at hydrological posts, m3/s

0,00

25,00

01.11.1982

01.12.1982

01.01.1983

01.02.1983

01.03.1983

01.04.1983

01.05.1983

01.06.1983

01.07.1983

01.08.1983

01.09.1983

01.10.1983

Q,

ку

б.

м/c

South Podlasie plain

0,00

9,00

01.11.1982 01.12.1982 01.01.1983 01.02.198301.03.1983 01.04.1983 01.05.1983 01.06.1983 01.07.1983 01.08.1983 01.09.1983 01.10.1983

Q, куб

. м

/с

Volyn Polesye

0,00

3,50

01.11.82 01.12.82 01.01.83 01.02.83 01.03.83 01.04.83 01.05.83 01.06.83 01.07.83 01.08.83 01.09.83 01.10.83

Q, куб

. м

/c

0,00

1,60

01.11.82 01.12.82 01.01.83 01.02.83 01.03.83 01.04.83 01.05.83 01.06.83 01.07.83 01.08.83 01.09.83 01.10.83

Q,

ку

б.

м/с

Rostock

c. – typical intra-annual distribution of water flow of

rivers within the physico-geographical districts

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

XI XII I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X

Q,

м3/с

Полтва (г. Буск)

Рата (с. Межеречье)

Влодавка (с. Окунинка)

Мухавец (г. Брест)

Кшна (с. Малова Гура)

Лесная (г. Каменец)

7

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

181

94

6

19

51

19

56

19

61

19

66

19

71

19

76

19

81

19

86

19

91

19

96

20

01

Q, м

3/с

р.Копаювка (с.Черск) р.Рыта (с. Малые Радваничи) р.Лесная (г. Каменец)

FEATURES OF WATER REGIME OF RIVERS

Kopayuvka (Czersk) Ryta (Small Radvanichi) Lesnaya (Kamianets)

Poltva (Busk)

Rata (Mezhirechye)

Vlodavka (Okuninka)

Mukhavets (Brest)

Ksna (Malova Gura)

Lesnaya (Kamianets)

Podil Upland

Area Subarea

Seasonal water flow in% of annual

Spring

(III–V)

Summer–

autumn

(VI–XI)

Winter

(XII–II)

А I. Podolsky 32–36 41–45 22–23

В II. Malopolessky 41–44 35–37 21–22

В III. Volynsky 36–44 28–30 28–34

В IV. Polessky 47–57 15–27 21–31

В V. Podlasko-

Predpolesski 33–46 22–36 31–33

Seasonal distribution of runoff within hydrological subareas

А – Mid-European hydrological region

В – Eastern European Hydrological Area

8

Сезонный сток

весна

лето - осень

зима

IVIV

I

V

II

III

Сезонный сток

весна

лето - осень

зима

IVIV

I

V

II

III

Зап. Буг

HYDROLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION

Seasonal water flow

Spring

Summer–autumn

Winter

9

а. – ratio of small river basins and elementary

units of the basin structure b. – ratio of types of small river basins

границы элементарных структур

бассейнового строения

границы малых водосборов Типы малых водосборов

частичные водосборы

частичные приречья

границы государств

Украина

Беларусь

Польша

S1

L5

X3

l5

R1

M1

K9

l6

M7

M3

M6

B24

m5k2

X1

K2

W1

m4

k3

b4

M10

M11

b2

L3

L1

l2

b7

k4

b5

R6

M5K7

B7

r1

l7

B19

u1

l4

R7

b12

m1

P4

M9

K1

P3

m2

B8B9

P2

b14

r2

B18

K10

B20

B2

b3

S2

m6

b6

M8

lg3

P5

b13

M2

B17

b15

l3

b8

h1

B1

B22

l1

lg1

b17

R2

H1

B16

h2

B21

m3

B15

p1

H6

P6

H2

K3

L6

H3B10

s1

Lg2

K11K4

U3

Lg4

b10

X2

M13K5

B12

U1

L2

R3

W3

B23

H7

L4

Lg6

W2

B4 B3

b11

Lg5

M12

H5

R5

P1

B25

K8

Lg1

K6

k1b16

b9

B5

B11

H8

U2

B6

M4

lg2

B13

R4

Lg7

H4

b1

w1

Lg3

B14

границы элементарных структур

бассейнового строения

границы малых водосборовТипы малых водосборов

частичные водосборы

частичные приречья

границы государств

Украина

Беларусь

Польша

S1

L5

X3

l5

R1

M1

K9

l6

M7

M3

M6

B24

m5k2

X1

K2

W1

m4

k3

b4

M10

M11

b2

L3

L1

l2

b7

k4

b5

R6

M5K7

B7

r1

l7

B19

u1

l4

R7

b12

m1

P4

M9

K1

P3

m2

B8B9

P2

b14

r2

B18

K10

B20

B2

b3

S2

m6

b6

M8

lg3

P5

b13

M2

B17

b15

l3

b8

h1

B1

B22

l1

lg1

b17

R2

H1

B16

h2

B21

m3

B15

p1

H6

P6

H2

K3

L6

H3B10

s1

Lg2

K11K4

U3

Lg4

b10

X2

M13K5

B12

U1

L2

R3

W3

B23

H7

L4

Lg6

W2

B4 B3

b11

Lg5

M12

H5

R5

P1

B25

K8

Lg1

K6

k1b16

b9

B5

B11

H8

U2

B6

M4

lg2

B13

R4

Lg7

H4

b1

w1

Lg3

B14

partial river basins riverside

ANALYSIS OF THE TERRITORIAL DIFFERENTIATION OF THE

CONDITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF SURFACE WATERS.

THE PROBLEM OF CHOOSING TERRITORIAL UNITS OF ANALYSIS

Lakes share (%) Share of wetlands (%)

Share of forests (%) Water flow m3/s Показатель нормы стока (куб. м/сек)

очень низкий (0.1 - 23.78)

низкий (23.78 - 47.46)

средний (47.46 - 71.14)

высокий (71.14 - 94.82)

очень высокий (94.82 - 118.5)

сток отсутствует

Показатель нормы стока (куб. м/сек)


низкий (23.78 - 47.46)

средний (47.46 - 71.14)

высокий (71.14 - 94.82)


сток отсутствует

Показатель лесистости (%)

очень низкий (2.42 - 21.288)

низкий (21.288 - 40.156)

средний (40.156 - 59.024)

высокий (59.024 - 77.892)


Показатель лесистости (%)

очень низкий (2.42 - 21.288)

низкий (21.288 - 40.156)

средний (40.156 - 59.024)

высокий (59.024 - 77.892)


Показатель болотистости (%)


низкий (9.13 - 18.23)

средний (18.23 - 27.33)

высокий (27.33 - 36.43)


болота отсутствуют

Показатель болотистости (%)


низкий (9.13 - 18.23)

средний (18.23 - 27.33)

высокий (27.33 - 36.43)


болота отсутствуют

Показатель озерности (%)


низкий(3.006 - 6.002)

средний (6.002 - 8.998)

высокий (8.998 - 11.994)


водоемы отсутствуют

Показатель озерности (%)


низкий(3.006 - 6.002)

средний (6.002 - 8.998)

высокий (8.998 - 11.994)


водоемы отсутствуют

ESTIMATION OF THE TERRITORIAL HETEROGENEITY OF

CONDITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF WATER FLOW 10

0,1‒23,78

23,78‒47,46

47,76‒71,14

71,14‒94,82

94,82‒118,5

no

0,03‒9,13

9,13‒18,23

18,23‒27,33

27,33‒36,43

36,43‒45,53

no

2,42‒21,288

21,228‒40,156

40,156‒59,024

59,024‒77,892

77,892‒96,76

0,01‒3,006

3,006‒6,002

6,002‒8,998

8,998‒11,994

11,994‒14,99

no

Показатель густоты русловой сети (км/кв. км)


низкий (0.41 - 0.77)

средний (0.77 - 1.13)

высокий (1.13 - 1.49)


Показатель густоты русловой сети (км/кв. км)


низкий (0.41 - 0.77)

средний (0.77 - 1.13)

высокий (1.13 - 1.49)


Density of the hydrographic network (km/km2)

Показатель распаханности (%)


низкий (17.21 - 33.15(

средний (33.15 - 49.08)

высокий (49.08 - 65.02)


Показатель распаханности (%)


низкий (17.21 - 33.15(

средний (33.15 - 49.08)

высокий (49.08 - 65.02)


Share of arable land (%)

Показатель доли городских территорий (%)

очень низкий (0.05 - 2.59)низкий (2.59 - 5.13)средний (5.13 - 7.66)высокий (7.66 - 10.2)очень высокий (10.2 - 12.74)городские территории отсутствуют

Показатель доли городских территорий (%)

очень низкий (0.05 - 2.59)низкий (2.59 - 5.13)средний (5.13 - 7.66)высокий (7.66 - 10.2)очень высокий (10.2 - 12.74)городские территории отсутствуют

Share of urban areas (%)

Показатель плотности сельского населения (чел/кв. км)

очень низкий (1 - 22.8)низкий (22.8 - 44.6)средний (44.6 - 66.4)высокий (66.4 - 88.2)очень высокий (88.2 - 110)сельские населенные пункты отсутствуют



Density of rural population (person on /km2)




низкий (17.21 - 33.15)

средний (33.15 - 49.08)

высокий (49.08 - 65.02)


ESTIMATION OF THE TERRITORIAL HETEROGENEITY OF

CONDITIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF WATER FLOW 11

0,05‒0,41

0,41‒0,77

0,77‒1,13

1,13‒1,49

1,49‒1,85

1,27‒17,21

17,21‒33,15

33,15‒49,08

49,08‒65,02

65,02‒80,96

0,05‒2,59

2,59‒5,13

5,13‒7,66

7,66‒10,2

10,2‒12,74

no

1‒22,8

22,8‒44,6

44,6‒66,4

66,4‒88,2

88,2‒110

no

12

Posts of regional monitoring systems:

The monitoring of the quality of the surface waters of the basin is

administratively and departmentally disconnected, within each of the

national parts of the basin observations are presented systems of state and

regional monitoring, including in Belarus, respectively, 9 and 15 , in

Ukraine - 32 and 39, in Poland -16 and 54 monitoring points.

posts of the boundary monitoring subsystem in the system of national monitoring of rivers in Poland

posts of the Department of Hydrometeorology of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Belarus, systems of organizations of the hydrometeorological service of the Ministry of Ecology of Ukraine, subsystems of basic monitoring in the system of national monitoring of rivers in Poland

posts of transboundary monitoring within the framework of the TACIS program (Ukraine)

posts of the Brest Regional Committee of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection (Belarus), State departments of ecology and natural resources in Lviv and Volyn regions (Ukraine), regional monitoring of the rivers of Lublin and Podlaskie voivodships (Poland)

Posts of state monitoring systems:

posts in the system of the State Committee for Water Management of Ukraine

INHOMOGENEITY OF THE EXISTING SURFACE

WATER MONITORING SYSTEM

BELARUS

UKRAINE

POLAND

OFFICIAL REFLECTION OF SURFACE WATER MONITORING

IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS 13

http://www.ecoinfo.by/content/753.html



NETWORK OF SURFACE WATER MONITORING POINTS IN THE

WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN, 2015 14




NETWORK OF SURFACE WATER MONITORING POINTS IN THE

WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN, 2015 15

DYNAMICS OF AVERAGE ANNUAL CONCENTRATIONS OF

PHOSPHATE ION IN THE WATER OF THE WESTERN BUG RIVER

BASIN, 2011‒2015

16





AMMONIUM ION IN THE WATER OF THE WESTERN BUG RIVER,

2011‒2015

17




NUMBER OF SITES IN THE WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN WITH

DIFFERENT HYDROCHEMICAL STATUS, 2011‒2015

a great good satisfactory bad very bad


18



NUMBER OF SITES IN THE WESTERN BUG RIVER BASIN WITH

DIFFERENT HYDROBIOLOGICAL STATUS, 2011‒2015

a great good satisfactory bad very bad


19




AMMONIUM ION IN THE WATER IN THE WATER TRIBUTARIES OF

THE WESTERN BUG RIVER, 2011‒2015


18



Documents

Associate professor of the Department of Geography and Nature … · 2017-12-22 · а. – bstructure of the hydrographic network . ... P2 b14 r2 B18 K10 B20 B2 b3 S2 m6 b6 M8 lg3