1
Results Acknowledgement: Assignment and Calibration of Relative Permeability by Hydrostratigraphic Units: A Novel Approach for Multiphase Flow Analyses Case Study: CO 2 -EOR Operations at the Farnsworth Unit, Texas Numerical Model Relative Permeability Relationships Abstract Among the most critical factors for geological CO 2 storage site screening, selection and operation is effective simulation of multiphase flow and transport. Relative permeability is probably the greatest source of potential uncertainty in multiphase flow simulation, second only to intrinsic permeability heterogeneity. The specific relative permeability relationship assigned greatly impacts forecasts of CO 2 trapping mechanisms, phase behavior, and long-term plume movement. A primary goal of this study is to evaluate the impacts and implications on CO 2 -EOR model forecasts of different methods of assigning relative permeability relationships. We applied a novel approach to assigning relative permeability relationships in numerical models. In previous research, most models assign relative permeability functions on the basis of geologic formation or rock type. In this study, we assign and calibrate relative permeability by hydrostratigraphic units, extending the seminal work of Maxey (1964) to multiphase flow. Ongoing work by the SWP has identified distinct regions that are believed to exhibit similar flow characteristics using the Improved Hydraulic Flow Units (IHFU) method. Core from each of these flow regions was scanned by micro-computer-tomography (micro-CT) and Mercury Intrusion Capillary Pressure (MICP) measurements were completed. Specific, constrained relative permeability relationships were assigned to each hydrostratigraphic unit. Results of forward simulations with the newly-calibrated models will be compared to those of existing model as well as a wide range of different relative permeability relationship. The study site is the Farnsworth Unit (FWU) in the northeast Texas Panhandle, an active CO 2 -EOR operation. The target formation is the Morrow ‘B’ Sandstone, a clastic formation composed of medium to course sands. The study was undertaken as part of the Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration (SWP) under Award No. DE-FC26-05NT42591. Two Approaches 1. Single Relative Permeability curve assigned to the whole model domain: [1] Morrow Sandstone relative permeability relationship, [2] Linear relative permeability relationship, [3-5] each individual Hydraulic Flow Unit (HFU) curve from all three Region models Hydraulic Flow Unit (HFU) relative permeability curves [3] Region1 curves vary the curve parameter lambda and the saturation end-points [4] Region2 curves vary the curve parameter lambda, the saturation end-points, and the relative permeability end-points [5] Regions3 curves vary the curve parameter lambda and the saturation end-points were determined from mercury intrusion capillary pressure measurements for each of the Hydraulic Flow Units (HFU) Model Domain Nathan Moodie, William Ampomah, Wei Jia, Brian McPherson Funding for this project is provided by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) through the Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration (SWP) under Award No. DE-FC26-05NT42591 Farnsworth Unit, Ochiltree County, Texas Mature oil field in the Anadarko Basin Primary production starting in 1955 Waterflooding starts in late 1964 CO 2 -EOR starts in late 2010 Estimated OOIP ~120 million barrels Average pay thickness is 22 ft #13-10A Injection well Petrel E&P Software Platform 3-D Mesh creation – 103x95x4 (x,y,z) with 33,756 active cells Grid properties creation – permeability & porosity distribution Initial conditions assignment – Water saturation, Oil saturation, and Pressure - INCON data from history matched water flood model Water Alternating Gas (WAG) schedule for 22 injection wells – pure CO 2 used as gas stream Bottom hole pressure limits (2400 psi) for 35 production wells - Wells shut when water cut is above 98% The total amount of stored CO 2 predicted is between 3.0 million tons and 3.4 million tons across all of the curves studied The Regions3 model predicts 14% more CO 2 as a mobile phase and 8% less dissolved phase when compared to the Base Case The three HFU regions models (Regions1, 2, 3) show a 26% variance in free gas in place and only a 3% variation in the total gas in place There is a 79% difference in the volume of free CO 2 predicted across all relative permeability curves tested There is a 49% difference in the dissolved gas phase across all the relative permeability curves tested Flow Regions Gas In Place, free gas and dissolved gas Hydraulic Flow Units (HFU) map of the entire reservoir showing the simulation model domain outlined in red. Hydraulic Flow Units were identified by D. Ross-Cross, W. Ampomah et al. (2016) (SPE-180375-MS) and used for the five grouped saturation regions in the simulation models; HFU1-2, HFU3-4, HFU5, HFU6, HFU7-8. Relative Permeability assignment by hydrostratigraphic units. Unique hydrostratigraphic units were delineated as Hydraulic Flow Unit (HFU) where the properties that control fluid flow are internally consistent but distinct from other rock units. The Winland R35 method was used to identify the HFUs by providing a means of correlating porosity to permeability by assuming that when a sample is 35% saturated during a MICP test continuous flow paths are established. These flow units are then assigned a relative permeability curve and forward simulations were carried out to elucidate the influence of this method. FWU faults model with all the injection and production wells used in this study. Faults are not barriers to flow in this model. Initial Conditions Initial oil saturation and water saturation was derived from a history matched primary production and waterflooding simulation. Oil Saturation Water Saturation Permeability distribution in the simulation model. This distribution was used to create the HFU relationship by the SWP - 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 60,000,000 Gas Volume [MSCF] Date Gas in place - 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 45,000,000 50,000,000 Gas Volume [MSCF] Date Solution gas in place - 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 Gas Volume [MSCF] Date Free gas in place 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 4,800 5,000 Pressure [psi] Date Pressure Base Model Regions3 Model Three-phase saturation maps at the end of the simulation (20 years of CO 2 -EOR) The Base Case and Regions3 models had very similar pressure profiles but different CO 2 phase distribution, oil production, and gas production. The yellow and brown boxes highlight areas of significant variation between the Base Model and the Regions3 Model [1]. The CO 2 plumes around each of the injection wells in the Regions3 model show a lot of variation from the Base Case model, with some wells predicting far less gas phase, especially in the South-central portion of the reservoir. When the end cases are evaluated, Region2 model HFU1-2 and HFU7-8 relative permeability curves, the difference in phase predictions is drastic [2]. BM-M2-Def3RP BM-M2-StnI3RP LM R1 R1-HFU1-2 R1-HFU3-4 R1-HFU5 R1-HFU6 R1-HFU7-8 R2 R2-HFU1-2 R2-HFU3-4 R2-HFU5 R2-HFU6 R2-HFU7-8 R3 R3-HFU1-2 R3-HFU3-4 R3-HFU5 R3-HFU6 R3-HFU7-8 -14,000,000 -12,000,000 -10,000,000 -8,000,000 -6,000,000 -4,000,000 -2,000,000 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 Variation in Gas In Place FGIP SGIP TGIP 1 2 3 4 5 Base Model 1 2 49% 79%

Assignment and Calibration of Relative Permeability by ... Library/Events/2017/carbon-storage... · Results Acknowledgement: Assignment and Calibration of Relative Permeability by

  • Upload
    vanliem

  • View
    214

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Assignment and Calibration of Relative Permeability by ... Library/Events/2017/carbon-storage... · Results Acknowledgement: Assignment and Calibration of Relative Permeability by

Results

Acknowledgement:

Assignment and Calibration of Relative Permeability by Hydrostratigraphic Units: A Novel Approach for Multiphase Flow Analyses

Case Study: CO2-EOR Operations at the Farnsworth Unit, Texas

NumericalModel

RelativePermeabilityRelationships

AbstractAmongthemostcriticalfactorsforgeologicalCO2 storagesitescreening,selectionandoperationiseffectivesimulationofmultiphaseflow

andtransport.Relativepermeabilityisprobablythegreatestsourceofpotentialuncertaintyinmultiphaseflowsimulation,secondonlytointrinsicpermeabilityheterogeneity.ThespecificrelativepermeabilityrelationshipassignedgreatlyimpactsforecastsofCO2 trappingmechanisms,phasebehavior,andlong-termplumemovement.AprimarygoalofthisstudyistoevaluatetheimpactsandimplicationsonCO2-EORmodelforecastsofdifferentmethodsofassigningrelativepermeabilityrelationships.Weappliedanovelapproachtoassigningrelativepermeabilityrelationshipsinnumericalmodels.Inpreviousresearch,most models

assignrelativepermeabilityfunctionsonthebasisofgeologicformationorrocktype.Inthisstudy,weassignandcalibraterelativepermeabilitybyhydrostratigraphicunits,extendingtheseminalworkofMaxey(1964)tomultiphaseflow.OngoingworkbytheSWPhasidentifieddistinctregionsthatarebelievedtoexhibitsimilarflowcharacteristicsusingtheImprovedHydraulicFlowUnits (IHFU)method.Corefromeachoftheseflowregionswasscannedbymicro-computer-tomography(micro-CT)andMercuryIntrusionCapillaryPressure(MICP)measurementswerecompleted.Specific,constrainedrelativepermeabilityrelationshipswereassignedtoeachhydrostratigraphicunit.Resultsofforwardsimulationswiththenewly-calibratedmodelswillbecomparedtothoseofexistingmodelaswellasawiderangeofdifferentrelativepermeabilityrelationship.ThestudysiteistheFarnsworthUnit(FWU)inthenortheastTexasPanhandle,anactiveCO2-EORoperation.Thetargetformationisthe

Morrow‘B’Sandstone,aclasticformationcomposedofmediumtocoursesands.ThestudywasundertakenaspartoftheSouthwestRegionalPartnershiponCarbonSequestration(SWP)underAwardNo.DE-FC26-05NT42591.

TwoApproaches1. SingleRelativePermeabilitycurveassignedtothewholemodeldomain:[1]MorrowSandstonerelativepermeabilityrelationship,[2]

Linearrelativepermeabilityrelationship,[3-5]eachindividualHydraulicFlowUnit(HFU)curvefromallthreeRegionmodels

HydraulicFlowUnit(HFU)relativepermeabilitycurves• [3]Region1curvesvarythecurveparameterlambdaandthe

saturationend-points• [4]Region2curvesvarythecurveparameterlambda,the

saturationend-points,andtherelativepermeabilityend-points• [5]Regions3curvesvarythecurveparameterlambdaandthe

saturationend-pointsweredeterminedfrommercuryintrusioncapillarypressuremeasurementsforeachoftheHydraulicFlowUnits(HFU)

ModelDomain

Nathan Moodie, William Ampomah, Wei Jia, Brian McPherson

FundingforthisprojectisprovidedbytheU.S.DepartmentofEnergy's(DOE)NationalEnergyTechnologyLaboratory(NETL)throughtheSouthwestRegionalPartnershiponCarbonSequestration(SWP)underAwardNo.DE-FC26-05NT42591

FarnsworthUnit,OchiltreeCounty,TexasMatureoilfieldintheAnadarkoBasin• Primaryproductionstartingin1955• Waterflooding startsinlate1964• CO2-EORstartsinlate2010• EstimatedOOIP~120millionbarrels• Averagepaythicknessis22ft

#13-10AInjectionwell

PetrelE&PSoftwarePlatform• 3-DMeshcreation– 103x95x4(x,y,z)with33,756active

cells• Gridpropertiescreation– permeability&porosity

distribution• Initialconditionsassignment– Watersaturation,Oil

saturation,andPressure- INCONdatafromhistorymatchedwaterfloodmodel

• WaterAlternatingGas(WAG)schedulefor22injectionwells– pureCO2 usedasgasstream

• Bottomholepressurelimits(2400psi)for35productionwells

- Wellsshutwhenwatercutisabove98%

• ThetotalamountofstoredCO2 predictedisbetween3.0milliontonsand3.4milliontonsacrossallofthecurvesstudied• TheRegions3modelpredicts14%moreCO2 asamobilephaseand8%lessdissolvedphasewhencomparedtotheBaseCase• ThethreeHFUregionsmodels(Regions1,2,3)showa26%varianceinfreegasinplaceandonlya3%variationinthetotalgasinplace• Thereisa79%differenceinthevolumeoffreeCO2 predictedacrossallrelativepermeabilitycurvestested• Thereisa49%differenceinthedissolvedgasphaseacrossalltherelativepermeabilitycurvestested

FlowRegions

GasInPlace,freegasanddissolvedgas

HydraulicFlowUnits(HFU)mapoftheentirereservoirshowingthesimulationmodeldomainoutlinedinred.HydraulicFlowUnitswereidentifiedbyD.Ross-Cross,W.Ampomah etal.(2016)(SPE-180375-MS)andusedforthefivegroupedsaturationregionsinthesimulationmodels;HFU1-2,HFU3-4,HFU5,HFU6,HFU7-8.

RelativePermeabilityassignmentbyhydrostratigraphicunits.UniquehydrostratigraphicunitsweredelineatedasHydraulicFlowUnit(HFU)wherethepropertiesthatcontrolfluidflowareinternallyconsistentbutdistinctfromotherrockunits.TheWinland R35methodwasusedtoidentifytheHFUsbyprovidingameansofcorrelatingporositytopermeabilitybyassumingthatwhenasampleis35%saturatedduringaMICPtestcontinuousflowpathsareestablished.Theseflowunitsarethenassignedarelativepermeabilitycurveandforwardsimulationswerecarriedouttoelucidatetheinfluenceofthismethod.

FWUfaultsmodelwithalltheinjectionandproductionwellsusedinthisstudy.Faultsarenotbarrierstoflowinthismodel.

InitialConditionsInitialoilsaturationandwatersaturationwasderivedfromahistorymatchedprimaryproductionandwaterflooding simulation.

OilSaturation WaterSaturation

Permeabilitydistributioninthesimulationmodel.ThisdistributionwasusedtocreatetheHFUrelationshipbytheSWP

-

10,000,000

20,000,000

30,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,000

Gas

Vol

ume

[MSC

F]

Date

Gas in place

-5,000,000

10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 45,000,000 50,000,000

Gas

Vol

ume

[MSC

F]

Date

Solution gas in place

-

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

Gas

Vol

ume

[MSC

F]

Date

Free gas in place

3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 4,800 5,000

Pres

sure

[psi

]

Date

Pressure

Base Model Regions3 Model

Three-phasesaturationmapsattheendofthesimulation(20yearsofCO2-EOR)TheBaseCaseandRegions3modelshadverysimilarpressureprofilesbutdifferentCO2 phasedistribution,oilproduction,andgasproduction.TheyellowandbrownboxeshighlightareasofsignificantvariationbetweentheBaseModelandtheRegions3Model[1].TheCO2 plumesaroundeachoftheinjectionwellsintheRegions3modelshowalotofvariationfromtheBaseCasemodel,withsomewellspredictingfarlessgasphase,especiallyintheSouth-centralportionofthereservoir.Whentheendcasesareevaluated,Region2modelHFU1-2andHFU7-8relativepermeabilitycurves,thedifferenceinphasepredictionsisdrastic[2].

BM

-M2-

Def

3RP

BM

-M2-

StnI

3RP

LM

R1

R1-

HFU

1-2 R

1-H

FU3-

4

R1-

HFU

5

R1-

HFU

6

R1-

HFU

7-8

R2

R2-

HFU

1-2 R2-

HFU

3-4

R2-

HFU

5

R2-

HFU

6

R2-

HFU

7-8

R3

R3-

HFU

1-2

R3-

HFU

3-4

R3-

HFU

5

R3-

HFU

6

R3-

HFU

7-8

-14,000,000

-12,000,000

-10,000,000

-8,000,000

-6,000,000

-4,000,000

-2,000,000

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

Variation in Gas In Place

FGIP

SGIP

TGIP

1 2

3

4 5

BaseModel

1

2

49%

79%