Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
CANFIC S I L V E R MINES LTD
COMSTOCK GROUP
SLOCAN MINING D I V I S I O N
B R I T I S H COLUMBIA
A P R I L 2 3 , 1 9 8 1
GE OCHEMI CAL-GEOPHY S I CAL REPORT
BY: J. PAUL STEVENSON
LAT. 4 9 ' 5 5 ' LONG. 117* 1 0 ' NTS 8 2 F / 1 4 E
. . .
N O R T H W E S T
T E R R I T O R I E S
COM STOCK - V I R G lNlA P R O P E K T Y / CANFIC S I L V E R MINES LTO.
C O M S T O C C - V I R G I N I A PRO4'ERTY I
r L I N D S
I I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COST STATEMENT
EXPLORATION REPORT
E N G I N E E R ' S SUMMARY
STATEMENT OF Q U A L I F I C A T I O N S
NOTICE TO GROUP
STATEMENT OF EXPLORATION & DEVELOPMENT
F u e l
A i r l i n e s A c c o m o d a t i o n s Food
Miscellaneous S u p p l i e s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n EM Repor t
EM 1 6 R e n t a l 0 Draughting Assay L a b Cos ts R e p r o d u c t i o n
Report Compilat ion R W P h e n d l e r P. Eng
R W P h e n d l e r P. Eng T y p i n g of r epor t
$
$
$
$
$ 3 t r i p s t o p rope r ty ':e$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4 days @ $ 2 5 0 / d a y $
4 days @ $ 3 0 0 / d a y $
$ 1 h r . @ $ 9 / h r
COST STATEMENT
Ins t rumen t Operator 1 4 days @ $ 1 0 0 / d a y $ 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 P r o s p e c t o r 8 days @ $ 1 5 0 / d a y $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Samplers ( i nc ludes opening a d i t ) 28 days @ $ 7 5 / d a y $ 4 , 2 0 0 . 0 0
Hel icopter 5 h r s @ $ 4 4 8 . 7 0 / h r $ 2 , 2 4 3 . 5 0 T r u c k 3050 km @.35/km $ 1 , 0 6 7 . 5 0
4 0 2 . 5 4
115.55 3 4 9 . 6 0 8 4 6 . 0 7 -- - 24 '7 .kO
. r J L
7,?512-;-80
3 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0
2 0 0 . 0 0 2 , 5 8 0 . 3 0
40 .00 2 0 0 . 0 0
1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0
9 . 0 0
Work occurred'from June 2 7 , 1 9 8 0 t o August 2 0 , 1 9 8 0
DEAKIN ELIUIPMENT LTD. 831 POWELL S T R E E T . VANCOUVER. B.C V 6 A 1H7 INVOICE NUMBER i
TELEPHONE. 253-2685 1 N? 3 9 0 9 9 1
I
FILE COPY
DEAKIN EG3UIPMENT LTD. 831 POWELL STREET, VANCOUVER. E C V 6 A 1H7
TELEPHONE z 53-26a35
.n W D E R A L T A X
y I N? 39100 1
______ -
F E D E R A L T A X NO. P R O V I N C I A L T A X NO.
T T 0 0
P P D . TERMS: P P D . COLL. C H G .
S H I P P E D V I A
1 % IO D A Y S
NET 30
I _ _
U N I T PRICE
\. /<-
’ T O T A L
PROV. T A X
FREIGHTIPOST
A M O U N T DUE
! l i
FILE COPY
c
f and ends onh when the rented
. .
. . . . .
. . ,
. .
.. .. . _. ..
. .
- . : ; , ! L
3 -
c
r-----.---- -7 ~
i p
R: W. PHENDLER, P. Eng., GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT, EXPLORATION AND MINING
7360 DECOURCY CRES., RICHMOND, B.C. V7G 4E9 (604) 271-2588
Ju ly 18,1980
Canfic Si lver Mines Ltd,
1090 1090 West Georgia Street ,
Vancouver,B.C. V6E 3V7
Attention; M r J . Dastnell
Invoice a 3 4
Professional services of R.W.Phendler,P.Eng as follows:
V i s i t t o Comstock-Virginia property on July 6,1980, attendance a t
meeting on June 30,1980 , check snow conditions and road access t o
property from Sandon on May 28,1980, general assistance i n locating director,
monitoring of program and preparation of progress report.
Equivalent of 4. days @ $250.Ix) per day - - - - - - - $1000 100 Recoverable expenses
July U+,1980 Assays Acme Labs 9; 67.75
R. W. PHENDLER, P. Eng., GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT, EXPLORATION AND MINING
7360 DECOURCY CRES., RICHMOND, B.C. V7C 4E9 1604) 271 -2588
Februa ry 1, 1 9 8 1
C a n f i c S i l v e r Mines, L td . 1 0 9 0 - 1 0 9 - W e s t Georg ia S t . Vancouver, B . C . V6E 3V7
I N V O I C E N 0 . 1 7 7
P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s of R.W. P h e n d l e r , P . Eng. f o r a n a l y z i n g
r e s u l t s o f 1980 geochemica l and g e o p h y s i c a l program, prep-
a r a t i o n of l e t t e r r e p o r t d a t e d J a n u a r y 1 8 , 1981 and c o n f e r e n c e .
on J a n u a r y 2 8 , 1 9 8 1 .
E q u i v a l e n t of 4 d a y s t i m e a t $300/day ...............$l,, 2 0 0 . 0 0
Recoverable expenses
Typing o f r e p o r t . . . . 1 h r . @ $9/hr .................. 9.00
TOTAL = $,209.00
EDWARD LITSETT LTD. 0 ‘Cervinj Vancouver iince 1991’
Post Office Box 1239, Station ‘A‘ Vancouver, B.C. \’6C 2T1 CANADA
telephone: 604-980-6725
EXPLORATION REPORT
ON THE
LINDSAY CLAIMS
FOR
C A N F I C S I L V E R MINES LTD.
BY
J. PAUL STEVENSON
NORTH VANCOUVER, B.C. NOVEMBER 4 , 1 9 8 0
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
LOCATION AND ACCESS
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP a
GEOCHEMICAL SOIL SURVEY
ROCK GEOCHEMISTRY
SUMMARY AND
DISCLAIMER
CERTIFICATE
CONCLUSIONS
GEOPHYSICAL REPORT
PHOTOGRAPHS
Page
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
ILLUSTRATIONS -
SILVER GEOCHEMISTRY MAP
LEAD GEOCHEMISTRY MAP
ZINC GEOCHEMISTRY
APPENDIX
- 1 -
I n t r o d u c t i o n
A t t h e r e q u e s t of M r . James D a r t n e l l t h e w r i t e r s t a k e d t h e Lindsay m i n e r a l claims i n t h e Kaslo a r e a . Subsequent ly a t t h e r e q u e s t ,of M r . D a r t n e l l , t h e w r i t e r p rovided t h e means f o r a n e x p l o r a t i o n program on t h e s e c l a i m s , now owned by Canf i c S i l v e r Mines Ltd. The w r i t e r made s e v e r a l v i s i t s t o t h e p r o p e r t y and l e f t a q u a l i f i e d man i n cha rge of t h e p r o j e c t . A soil sample su rvey and an EM16 survey w a s completed. The middle a d i t on t h e crown g r a n t s w a s a l s o opened. All work w a s s u b j e c t t o approva l by M r . Roy Phendler P. Eng, t h e company's c o n s u l t a n t .
I
Locat ion and Access
The Lindsay c l a i m s , i n c l u d i n g crown g r a n t s V i r g i n i a , Cornstock, and Erie, are l o c a t e d a t an e l e v a t i o n of 2 , 2 0 0
meters abou t 1 0 0 k i l o m e t e r s n o r t h of Nelson, i n t h e S locan Mining District.Access is by h e l i c o p t e r from t h e n o r t h o r sou th . Okanagan H e l i c o p t e r s has a 2 0 6 B Je t Ranger based a t Nelson, B . C . The s o u t h approach i s t h e approach o r i g i n a l l y used. Access i s by t h e Glacier Park access road on Keen Creek, t hence by h e l i c o p t e r up Long Creek. A s h o r t e r access has been l o c a t e d . Road access now e x i s t s t o upper Cody Creek and cou ld be ex tended o n t o t h e claims.
P r o p e r t y Ownership /
The Lindsay p r o p e r t y c o n s i s t s of f i v e m i n e r a l c l a i m s and t h r e e crown Lindsay 1 Lindsay 2
Lindsay 3 Lindsay 4
Lindsay 5 Crown Grant Crown Grant Crown Grant
g r a n t s as below:
1027
1028 1029
- 2 -
Canfic Silver Mines now owns the Lindsay claims and holds the crown grants under option from M r . Frank Juhan.
Geochemical Soil Survey
Approximately 20 line kilometers was surveyed by acceptable sampling technique. The soil development is typical of alpine regions with poor strata development, wherever possible the top of the B horizon was sampled. of and downslope from the portals are to be considered contaminated. The soil samples were delivered to Chemex Labs Ltd. in North
Vancouver, B. C. The samples were dried, sorted, and sifted to -80 mesh. atomic absorption testing.
I
The samples immediately north
Results for Ag, Cu, Pb, zh were obtained by A t o t a l of 1374 soil samEles were taken.
Rock Geochemistry
The middle adit was chip sampled at 3 meter intervals. All sample locations were marked with red spray paint. rock sample was taken at location 5 3 N + 28W which appeared to contain sulphide (PbS) mineralization. Unfortunately this sample was removed from the truck.
A
It is obvious that the area of interest on the Lindsay Group is much more extensive than the original showing. can safely assume that more than'one structure exists and that more work on the claims is necessary. indicate three districts of interest and several prospective drill targets. is necessary and that development of this property will entail more "grass roots" exploration.
We
The enclosed maps
It is apparent that some detailed geology
Disclaimer
The writer of this report is not a professional Engineer, nor is he associated with an engineering firm. All future work
- 3 -
should be undertaken only after the data has been reviewed by an engineer and the engineer has outlined a specific program for the property.
a
Respectfully submitted,
K' Paul Stevenson
u. Certificate
I, J. Paul Stevenson of 1650 Riverside Drive, North Vancouver, B. C. do hereby certify:
That I have been involved in mineral exploration since 1965.
0
That I have been engaged in prospecting and development in B.C., the Yukon, and the Northwest Territories.
That this program was managed by myself and that the party chiefs were qualified to direct the day to day work.
That I am not a professional engineer or professional geologist.
That I do not own any shares of Canfic Silver Mines Ltd. directly or indirectly. -
JPPaul Stevenson, Prospector
i :7. !
3,
2 -
C
.I/ .i ,i ./ .i
.< > . .
. .# . I# I ; % . ! . .
, . .. ,2. .! .I ., . , ./ . , a :
G.. .. , I
! -, .. . x . .I
..
. ' J .z .. I
I' 2,. .. .
,. . .. .A a
-.i .L' i- - 2 :
50
72
5
76
GE OPHY S I CAL REPORT I
ON THE
LINDSAY CLAIMS
by DAVID S1. COOTE GEOPHY S IC1 ST
/
- .. . . . .
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
INSTRUMENTATION AND THEORY
SURVEY PROCEDURE I
COMP I LAT I ON OF DATA
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
SUMMARY
CERTIFICATE
Page
1
1
2
2
3
4
5
- 1 -
Introduction
This report discusses the survey procedure, compilation of data, and the interpretation of a very low frequency electro magnetic (VLF-Ev) survey carried out on the Lindsay group during the 1980 field season. Approximately 20 line kms were surveyed.
The primary purpose of the VLF-EM survey was to locate potential veins and structures for localizing mineralization. The lines were run across strike of thq one known structure.
Instrumentation and Theory Guntcs I - /b
A standard"VLF-EM Receiver was used for the survey. This - instrument is designed to measure the magnetic component of a very low frequency (VLF) electromagnetic field. The U. S. Navy submarine transmitter located at Seattle, Washington and transmitting at 18.6 K H z was used.
In all electromagnetic exploration, a transmitter produces an alternating magnetic field (primary) by a strong alternating current usually through a wire coil. If a conductive mass such as a sulphide body is within this magnetic field, a
. secondary alternating current is induced within it which in turn induces a secondary magneti? field that distorts the primary magnetic field. It is this distortion that the EM receiver measures. The VLF-EM uses a frequency range from 16 to 2 4 KHZ whereas most EM instruments use frequencies ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand Hz. Because of its relatively high frequency, the VLF-EM can pick up bodies of a low conductivity and therefore is more susceptible to clay beds, electrolyte-filling fault on shear zones and porous horizons, graphite, carbonaceous sediments, lithological contacts as well as sulphide bodies of too low a coductivity for the other EM methods to pick up.,
- 2 -
Consequently, the VLF-EM has additional uses in mapping structure and in picking up sulphide bodies of too low a conductivity for conventional EM methods and too small for induced polarization. However, Its susceptibility to lower conductive bodies results in a number of anomalies, many of them difficult to explain and, thus, VLF-EM preferably should not be interpreted without a good geological knowledge of the property and/or other geophysical and geochemical surveys.
b
Survey Procedure
The VLF-EM survey was run on a grid in which the lines run at 120° - 300' at 100 meter intervals from a base'sline running on s t r i k e with the initial view at 30°. were taken every 2 5 meters and stations are marked with survey flagging with co-ordinates marked with felt pen. Care was taken in regard to technique to compensate for the steep terrain. Some areas were not surveyed due to steep cliffs. All readings were taken facing Seattle.
Readings
Compilation of Data
The readings were reduced by applying the Fraser Filter and plotted at a scale of 1:5000. Filtered data, as shown on the accompanying map are plotted between the reading stations. The positive filtered'values were contoured at intervals of 5' starting at 5'.
operator which transforms zero crossings into peaks, and a low pass smoothing operator which reduces the inherent high frequency noise in the data. Therefore, the noisy, non- contourable data are transformed into less noisy, contourable data. Another advantage of this filter is that a conductor that does not show up as a cross-over on the unfiltered data quite often will show up on the filtered data.
The Fraser Filter is essentially a 4-point difference
- 3 -
Discussion of Results
The major cause of VLF-EM anomalies, as a rule, are geologic structures such as a fault, shear and breccia zones. It is therefore logical to interpret VLF-EM anomalies to likely be caused by these structural zones. It is generally accepted that when VLF-EM anomalies correlate with sulphide mineralization the anomalies are usually reflecting the structure associated with the mineralization rather than the mineralization itself.
On the survey grid three main structures or trends are outlined. All three of these structures are parallel to the strike line of the discovery vein. Anomalies of higher intensity are significant. Structure 1 :
Structure 2 :
Structure 3 :
found within these structures which may be
This anomaly runs along the west edge of the grid. Since these anomalies are not closed of f completely, a future survey should be extended to the west.
This long narrow structure runs through the middle of the grid almost parallel to the baseline. This anomaly disappears between lines 5 3 N and 5 6 N probably due to the increase in overburden. The most interesting part of the anomaly lies between lines 45N and 46N. This area should be investigated further. On line 41N there is a small large intensity anomaly, however due to insufficient data (because of cliffs) the significance cannot be fully assessed.
This structure lies on the eastern side of the grid. Between 46N and 4 9 there is no data. On line 5 5 N & 3 4 E and 41N & 32E anomalies of higher intensity occur. These anomalies should definately be followed up.
/
- 4 -
Summary
It is apparent that this property warrants further work. Exploration of the many VLF-EM anomalies and soil anomalies (discussed elsewhere in this report) on the existing grid should be a priority. These low cost techniques should be extended over other areas of the property. of the three main structures generally coincide with soil geochemistry is very significant. A future VLF-EM surve]y to the west would close off the existing western anomolous structure.
The fact that two I
- 5 -
Certificate
I, David S Coote do hereby certify:
1451 Lennox, North Vancouver, B. C. (1) That I am a practicing geophysicist with offices at
L
( 2 ) That I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia (1972) and hold a BSc degree in Physics, Geophysics.
( 3 ) That I have been practicing my profession in B. C., the Yukon and Northwest Territories, and Europe for nine years.
( 4 ) That this report is compiled from data provided to me by Edward Lipsett Ltd. -
( 5 ) That I do not hold any interest in Canfic Silver Mines Ltd. or the Lindsay claims at this time, nor do I expect to receive any interest as a result of writing this report.
Date: October 9, 1980 David S. Coote Geophysicist
I n s i d e th .e middle a d i t
h igh g r a d e v e i n exposed
wheel barrow
high grade
of
view of v a l l e y
t h e a d i t s
from
Opening the middle
0
ad .it
R. S&'. PHENDLER, P. Eng., GEOLOGICAL CONSULTANT, EXPLORATION AND MINING
7 3 6 0 DECOURCY CRES., RICHMOND, B.C. V7C 4E9 (604) 271-2588
January 18, 1981
9
The Directors, Canfic Silver Mines, Ltd. 1090 - 1090 W. Georgia St. Vancouver, B.C. V6E 3V7
Gentlemen :
Re: Report on 1980 Program - Comstock - Virginia Property.
The 1980 exploration program consisted of geochemical and (56 meters) geophysical work and the rehabilitation of the 185'
long middle adit, as per the recommendations in my report of May 16, 1980.
The surveys were conducted over approximately 20 kilometers (12 miles) of grid lines that covered an area 2 kilometers long by one kilometer wide, the long dimension striking northeast or parallel to the Comstock - Virginia vein. and electromagnetic readings were taken at 25 meter intervals on the 100 meter spaced lines and soil samples were assayed for Ag, Pb, Zn and Cu.
Geochemical samples
SILVER - The presence of three anomalous areas were disclosed in the survey which warrant more detailed study. The portal area showed anomalous soil conditions over a strike length of 200 meters with an additional 100 meters indicated about 50 meters to the south.
The north anomaly measures about 200 meters by 50 meters with 1 5 anomalous s o i l samples and does not appear to be an extension of
the principal Comstock - Virginia vein. Intermediate lines should be sampled to the north and south.
striking bands of anomalous values that cover about 600 meters by 300 meters. Additional sampling on intermediate lines and new cross lines to the south is required.
The south anomalous area consists of a number of northeasterly
LEAD - The portal area where the Comstcrk - Virginia vein is located is clearly shown as a lead anomaly extending for 300 meters in a northeasterly direction. This anomaly is co-incident with the silver anomaly and shows the strength of the vein.
. . . .2
A number of isolated samples show anomalous conditions for lead in the general north area and appear to be unrelated.
The south area shows three anomalous values, only one of - which is co-incident with an anomalous silver value. Lead is considerably less mobile than silver and may not have been dis- persed, if present in the area at all.
ZINC - The portal area anomaly is present, similar to that for silver and lead. Two hundred and fifty meters to the southeast are a nurnber of anomalous values for zinc. This anomaly is evident on two adjacent lines and is co-incident with anomalous values in lead and silver and shall be designated the east zone.
The south zone is evident with a similar pattern to that shown for silver but much less extensive. Additional geochemical sampling is required as is some prospecting and mapping.
GEOPHYSICS
A very low frequency electromagnetic (VLF - EM) survey was conducted over the 20 kilometer grid. Four anomalies (conductors) were discovered, none of which overlie the Comstock - Virginia vein. In general, the major causes of anomalies are faults, shear zones or breccia zones, which may or may not be associated with mineralization.
Of the f o u r anomalies discovered, only one (south area) is co-incident with a geochemical anomaly. The other E-M conductors lie (1) on the west edge of the grid (no geochemical anomalies)
on the west part of the grid an elongated zone parallels the Comstock - Virginia vein and lies 150 meters to the west. This probably is related to a strong fault zone (no geochemical anomaly). A conductor was discovered on the northeast edge of the grid. No geochemical anomalies are located there but a weaker subsidiary conductor lying 100 meters to the west- is co-incident with a major silver geochemical anomaly.
( 4 ) Two isolated, small, but intense conductors were found on the south limit of the grid that coincide with both silver and zinc anomalies. Additional geochemical and E-M work is recommended to the south.
(2)
( 3 )
- 2 -
CONCLUSIONS
t h e Comstock - V i r g i n i a v e i n t o have a s t r i k e l e n g t h of a t least 300 meters. A d d i t i o n a l anomal ies i n both s i l v e r and z i n c w e r e d i s c o v e r e d which war ran t a d d i t i o n a l e x p l o r a t i o n and i n a d d i t i o n , more work i s r e q u i r e d t o t h e sou th .
It a p p e a r s t h a t t h e Comstock - V i r g i n i a v e i n is a s s o c i a t e d w i t h a r e l a t i v e l y weak conduc t ive zone, i n d i c a t i n g t h a t t h e most f a v o u r a b l e p l a c e t o e x p l o r e f o r new v e i n s i s o v e r geochemical anomal ies c o - i n c i d e n t w i t h conduc to r s of moderate i n t e n s i t y .
The geochemical survey was s u c c e s s f u l i n t h a t it showed
The n o r t h s i l v e r anomaly appea r s t o be
.W. Ph
- 3 -
STATEMENT OF OUALIFICATIONS
I , J. P a u l S tevenson , d o c e r t i f y :
T h a t I have been engaged i n v a r i o u s a s p e c t s o f
mining e x p l o r a t i o n s i n c e 1965,
Tha t o v e r t h e p a s t seven y e a r s I have d i r e c t e d and
have been r e s p o n s i b l e f o r numerous e x p l o r a t i o n and
development programmes,
Tha t a l l work w a s conducted i n a p r o f e s s i o n a l manner
and h a s been approved by R. P h e n d l e r , P.Eng. ,
Tha t a l l costs can be v e r i f i e d w i t h r e c e i p t s and i n v o i c e s .
R e s p e c t f u l l y submi t t ed May 8 , 1981.
Y J . P a u l S tevenson
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~ ..... .. .__.. .......... 1 _ . ...... ;..-”.-,\%:*.<.: .,.,- /y \
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
/’
(The itemized cost statement must be part of the report.)
AATEMENT
COST
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MnceofBritiiColilrnbia ~
Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources
M!NERAL ACT
Mil\iZ%L RESOURCES BRANCH-TITLES DIVISION M.R. ff ................. S ................. ” i vfin e e u v E R, a. c.
L L - - - _-.__
Valid subsisting F.M.C. No. .z. cg$ ?3. . . . . . .
I have done, or caused to be done, work on the . . L e (9 .< 71% .<. . . .Gk? <!f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ & P s & Y . . L / ~ / D J X Y ~ . . L A W J ~ / . ~ . . .A.)K~T!T.<. L k p / i g x < .<,.C (e< 7, ./P=i$/~:3,~laim(s)
Record No.(s) . . ,/~&?,i . /gf/, ./g,$.z. 1 . .1&82~ /I 6.9% . . Lo?. 3 . (cAg~ ./cr?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Situate a t / .).&Lk P. in the &.4<.@A/. Mining Division,
to the value of at least . .l &ewjf .-.%%/$. vj?v<‘?’Yi>. . dollars. Work was done from the . . . .’!6 . . . . . . . . day
o f . . ..J.&!,L.Y . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ~YQ.. ... tothe ..z.Q.. . dayof . . . ~ I G ~ s . T . ...... 19 $P . . . . .
Valid subsisting F.M.C. No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . STATE THAT
I .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /
2. The following work was done in the 12 months in which such work is required to be done:
(COMPLETE APPROPRIATE SECTION(S) A, B, C, D, FOLLOWING)
TOTAL PHYSICAL I.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I wish to apply S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of physical work to the claims l isted below.
(State number o f years t o b e applied t o each claim, its m o n t h o f record, and ident i fy each claim b y name and record no.)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(State number o f years to b e applied t o each claim, its m o n t h of record, and ident i fy each claim by name and record no.)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(For C a n d 0 Section$, plnara rum over . ) . 3 2
. . . . . ” . I , # , ., , . ._
i I
buiations.) /ieport.)
I
Portable Assessment Credits (PAC) Withdrawal Request
C. DRlLLli
A M O U N T
D. GEOLC
T O T A L OF C A N D (OR) D PLUS PAC W I T H D R A W A L
7 I: ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 c k t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
, .
3:' :. !L:I.+: .:. ...... !'.Y.....' :.:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , ..
t d . &/.4 . . . . . . . . . . I
T O T A L OF C A N D D
*I//- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- ~
----"/
.................... I . . . . . . . !G2, .44Q.. ?.e . . I .Ysa,. QF.@. .P . 0 . . . . . . . .I
Who was the operator (provided the financing)?
Name ..... c?Nz!c. . . . .-$4.< 6<. . f l<@F:<. . .L ??? . . . . . . Address . ~- ./(G?.o. .,. . /s?.o. . .&*< ?. . .6cL:'?<./.!? . . . x?.. . . . .
. . . . ...........................
I .
Name of Owner . , . .
, . , ,.
(May be no more than 30 per cent 1. ..................................... of value of the approved work submitted as assessment work in 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C and (or) D.) . .
3. ................................... . 4. ...................................
.....................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................
..................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I ' 1 T O T A L W I T H D R A W A L I . .
I wish to apply S . . s . ? / q L ? , O o f this work to the claims listed below.
(State number of years to be applied to each claim, i ts month of record, and identity each claim by name and record no.)'
. . .&.L.ax4.f? . (. . /.$%;lw . . . . Iy.i-+-. . . ./.5LfQ. . . . . . . . .&-w. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J3"O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .L !/VP.Jfl.Y. 3'. .43?.4 . . . . !.pi-. . . ,.L k f t . . . . . . . . c$@;? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. L .//?,O$d?. - 4 . .flP4./.L:. . . 1 y<df-. . . . .m2.. . . . . . . /W:? n V . ........................... dO cr: .L &.<!???. 2: . H e ! $. . . . 1 . yw . . . . l$X.f. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . .
. . , . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..,.s. . .,
Value of work to be credited to portable assessment credit (PAC) accountk).
I , (May only be credited from the approved value of C and (or) D not applied to claims.)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -I 2. .I 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
in operatorM name I. . .??:::#:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .. ,. '.., , I ,. ., $ 8 , , , 1 , . ) / . I , ,/..I . ,, I t
I ' '8 8
:I t
(party providing 11" , ,<,*,.,.I. ,,,,# I , , ' . the financing). 2. . . :i. . . i ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . ..................
Q
We, the undersigned owners* of the following adjoining claims, desire to group them according to the Mineral Act: -
Month
Units Record NAME OF CLAIM No. of Record No. of SIGNATURE OF OWNER*
4 . . .A. C/4D.J.4.f(. .s . . . . . . . . . . i o y * *. . .!.v4.
. . 4 . / E O . & ? :3.. . . . . . . . . .2.s?. . . /.66 .&. . .+..
. . cs LRd?.X&?Y.&. ..z.9.. . .&P.L . . .+. .L./&f.dU.Bf/. A!. . . /g:.?. 4
. C.&.4!f?J. &w T .L .8.*$?<C.c. ! . . .L./roz. 7.
. LflQ.+! ?.G.<&! 7. . .L!/*?G.&<YX .1 . . [email protected]
. .G.R?L.L'.f?. G?t?v.ys:. za.-C.. . . f. . . .L./O;L:!.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JNDJ/?,U. Q-. . . . . . . . . . < -xd .e v . . Mf3 . . . . f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
/ / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C,& ?.!< . <we.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / 4 G & C T . ..... . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * M a y be 5ign.J b y agent on behalf of owner.
. . '9; 'ti
the provisions of
Free Miner Certificate No.
???. C.??. . . . . .
. 2 .~ .8$ .?3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
prorince of wwl Coiurnbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources
MINERAL RESOURCES BRANCH-TITLES DIVISION
MINERAL ACT
FORM I
I PC) 1 5 1982 . . . . c
M.R. W ................. $ ................. VAiJCOt'VE;F7, B.C.
