12
Assessment Policies Assessment Policies 1 Assessment Policies Implementation and Monitoring American Institutes for Research February 2005

Assessment Policies 1 Implementation and Monitoring American Institutes for Research February 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies1

Assessment PoliciesImplementation and Monitoring

American Institutes for ResearchFebruary 2005

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies2

State Assessment Policy State Assessment Policy States are required to have an

assessment policy that describes: Valid and reliable assessments,

appropriate for adult literacy students Standardized administration procedures Scoring and reporting procedures Training activities

DAEL verifies policy through data quality checklist and monitoring visits

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies3

Findings from Review of State Findings from Review of State Assessment Policies Assessment Policies

Only 36 states submitted a complete assessment policy

Inappropriate tests still being used “Informal classroom/teacher

observation” still listed as assessment method

Allowed use of same form for pre- and post-test

Time for post-testing not specified or widely variant – few standards for post-testing specified

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies4

DAEL Monitoring Visits Also DAEL Monitoring Visits Also Found:Found: Lack of written assessment policies Insufficient or incomplete policies in several

areas Use of inappropriate tests Most common problems:

Time interval between pre- and post-testing was uneven, inappropriate or inconsistently implemented

Much information in data quality checklists could not be verified by the monitoring team.

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies5

Requirements for Requirements for AssessmentsAssessments Standards test, conforming to

psychometric standards Test designed to measure progress in

basic and/or functional literacy skills Multiple, parallel forms Identify unacceptable assessment

methods

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies6

Required Administration Required Administration ProceduresProcedures Set times for pre- and post-testing

followed by all programs Number of hours or weeks of attendance

How to test and place special populations (e.g., unable to test)

Different forms used for pre- and post-tests

Correct test procedures used

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies7

Scoring and Reporting Scoring and Reporting RequirementsRequirements Placement benchmarks for pre-test

scores Advancement benchmarks for post-

test scores tied to assessments Teachers should have access to scores

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies8

Effective TrainingEffective Training Local test administration staff trained on

test administration and scoring procedures

Conducted by a qualified person Sufficient number of staff trained in

each program Quality training materials used Multiple and ongoing, follow-up training

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies9

Improved Pre-Post Test RatesImproved Pre-Post Test Rates Without post-test no level gain can be

reported Improved post-testing leads to better

overall performance Table 4B data limited

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies10

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies11

Monitoring Assessment Monitoring Assessment ProceduresProcedures Test scores recorded with:

Administration date Test name and form used in database Scale scores Hard wire to EFL

Timely review of data -- on-site monitoring and review

Training: who trained, by whom, how many staff?

Assessment PoliciesAssessment Policies12

DiscussionDiscussion Assessment policy issues Monitoring and implementing

assessment policies Strategies for improving proportion of

students post-tested Other??