Assessment of Reading, Writing and Mathematics: Primary ...€¦ · Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how Aldo’s attitude about using the book

EQAO, 2 Carlton Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5B 2M9 • 1-888-327-7377 • Web site: www.eqao.com • © 2011 Queen’s Printer for Ontario


Assessment of Reading, Writing and Mathematics: Primary Division

Released 2014 Assessment: Language 1, Reading

Item-Specific Rubrics and

Sample Student Responses with Annotations


http://www.eqao.com/



Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2014) Short Narrative

The In-Line Skating Lesson – Section A – Question 4 Q.4 Explain how Farah helps to make Aldo’s skating lesson a success. Use details from the text to support your answer.

Code Descriptor

B

• Blank: nothing written or drawn in the space provided

I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., Farah helps make Aldo’s lesson a success. )

10

Response attempts to answer how Farah helps to make Aldo’s skating lesson a success. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of how Farah helps to make Aldo’s skating lesson a success. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection

The response usually requires the reader to connect the support to what it is intended to prove.

30

Response indicates an understanding by explaining how Farah helps to make Aldo’s skating lesson a success. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support

The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and what it is intended to prove.

40

Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how Farah helps to make Aldo’s skating lesson a success and provides specific and relevant support.


The In-Line Skating Lesson – Section A – Question 4

Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to explain how Farah helps to make Aldo’s skating lesson a success by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., Farah was telling Aldo step by step what to do).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of how Farah helps to make Aldo’s skating lesson a success by providing vague support (e.g., reading him the steps and helping him with how to stop.) The response requires the reader to connect the support to what is intended to prove.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of how Farah helps to make Aldo’s skating lesson a success by including some accurate and relevant support (e.g., when he is falling Farah read him “relax and be a wet noodle and fall.” ) and some vague support (e.g., Farah reads a book to Aldo to help him). The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and what it is intended to prove.



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing specific and relevant support (e.g., Farah teach’s Aldo how to stop by falling to the ground) and explains fully how Farah helps Aldo make his skating lesson a success (e.g., At first Farah tryed to tell Aldo how to stop but Aldo didn’t so at the end Aldo wants to know to stop).


The In-Line Skating Lesson – Section A – Question 5 Q.5 Explain how Aldo’s attitude about using the book changes after he starts to skate. Use details from the text to support your answer.

Code Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., Aldo’s attitude changes after he skates.)

10

Response attempts to answer how Aldo’s attitude about using the book changes after he starts to skate. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of how Aldo’s attitude about using the book changes after he starts to skate. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding by explaining how Aldo’s attitude about using the book changes after he starts to skate. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support


40

Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how Aldo’s attitude about using the book changes after he starts to skate and provides specific and relevant support.



Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to explain how Aldo’s attitude about using the book changes after he starts to skate by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., he didnt look at the book at first).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of how Aldo’s attitude about using the book changes after he starts to skate by providing vague support (e.g., he thought he knew what to do but he didn’t so he read the book how to skate). The response requires the reader to connect the support to what is intended to prove.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of how Aldo’s attitude about using the book changes after he starts to skate by including some accurate and relevant support (e.g., at the end he wanted to start at lesson 1, leraning how to fall down) and some underdeveloped support (e.g., he did’t want to practise to Fall down). The response requires the reader to connect the support to what is intended to prove.



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how Aldo’s attitude about using the book changes after he starts to skate using specific and relevant support of (e.g. in the beginning he didn’t think he needed the book he just laughed and said, “I don’t want to fall down” and “I don’t want to stop” but in the end he said, “Farah! Read how to stop!” So in the end he realized he needed the book and he wanted to read it).

Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2014) Poem

Two Chains – Section A – Question 10 Q.10 Explain why the animals in the pond behave differently than the cow. Use details from the poem and your own ideas to support your answer.

Code Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., The pond animals behave differently than the cow.)

10

Response attempts to explain why the animals in the pond behave differently than the cow. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support

20

Response indicates a partial understanding why the animals in the pond behave differently than the cow. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding by explaining why the animals in the pond behave differently than the cow. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support


40

Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully why the animals in the pond behave differently than the cow and provide specific and relevant support.


Two Chains – Section A – Question 10

Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to answer why the animals in the pond behave differently than the cow by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., becouse they are carnivors).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of why the animals in the pond behave differently than the cow by providing limited support (e.g., cause all the animals diden’t get to eat but the cow had a chance to eat). The response requires the reader to connect the support to what is intended to prove.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of why the animals in the pond behave differently than the cow by including some accurate and relevant support (e.g., the animals in the pond are carnavors and the cow just eats grass and the cow dosen’t have to chase it food) and some underdeveloped support (e.g., the animals in the pond have to catch the food). The response requires the reader to connect the support to what is intended to prove.



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of why the animals in the pond behave differently than the cow by providing specific and relevant support (e.g., those animals actually eat other animals; But the cow just eats grass and drinks water) and explains fully (For example,“And in a tree there stood a hawk, who thought a snake would make his day.” So the hawk is eating a animal, not grass like a cow).


Two Chains– Section A – Question 11

Q.11 Explain how the word “chains” in the title “Two Chains” helps the reader understand the poem. Use details from the poem to support your answer.

Code Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., The word chain helps to understand the title.)

10

Response attempts to explain how the word “chains” in the title “Two Chains” helps the reader understand the poem. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support

20

Response indicates a partial understanding how the word “chains” in the title “Two Chains” helps the reader understand the poem. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding by explaining how the word “chains” in the title “Two Chains” helps the reader understand the poem. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support


40

Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how the word “chains” in the title “Two Chains” helps the reader understand the poem and provide specific and relevant support.



Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to explain how the word “chains” in the title “Two Chains” helps the reader understand the poem by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., because there is two food chains).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of how the word “chains” in the title “Two Chains” helps the reader understand the poem by providing vague support (e.g., animals are trying to eat each other and the cow only wants to eat the grass). The response requires the reader to connect the support to what is intended to prove.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of how the word “chains” in the title “Two Chains” helps the reader understand the poem by including some accurate and relevant support (e.g., the bugs ar eaten by the dragon fly, the frog eat’s the dragon fy, the snak it’s the frog, the hock it’s the snack, but at the end the cow comes in and it only it’s grass) and some underdeveloped support (e.g., it is like a chaine; It is lik a chain atacht togather).



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of how the word “chains” in the title “Two Chains” helps the reader understand the poem by providing specific and relevant support (e.g., it is like a food chain; The dragon fly wanted bugs, the frog wanted the dragonfly, the snake wanted the frog and the hawlk wanted the snake) and explains fully (e.g., Now when the cow that just eats grass. That is the second chain. First is the meat chain and the cow is the plant chain).

Scoring Guide for Open Response Question (2014) Informational

Ryan’s Well – Section B – Question 5 Q.5 Explain how a well is helpful to communities. Use details from the text to support your answer.

Code Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., A well is helpful to communities.)

10

Response attempts to answer explain how a well is helpful to communities. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of how a well is helpful to communities. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding by explaining how a well is helpful to communities. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support


40

Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how a well is helpful to communities and provides specific and relevant support.


Ryan’s Well - Section B –Question 5

Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to explain how a well is helpful by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., because they provide clean water).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of how a well is helpful by providing limited support (e.g., they give us clean water and if we don’t have clean water we can get sick). The response requires the reader to connect the support to what it’s intended to prove.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of how a well is helpful by providing some accurate and relevant support (e.g., The text says: people in other contries don’t have indoor sinks. The havc to walk for hours to get clean water) and some vague support (e.g., it provieds clean water). The response requires the reader to connect the support to what is intended to prove.



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of how a well is helpful by providing specific and relevant support (e.g., because in the text it said that people could get sick if they didn’t have clean water to drink) and explains fully (e.g., it said that people in some countries do not have indoor sinks and have to walk for hours to get clean water).


Ryan’s Well – Section B – Question 6 Q.6 Explain how Ryan is making a difference in the world. Use details from the text and your own ideas to support your answer.

Code Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., Ryan is making a difference in the world.)

10

Response attempts to answer how Ryan is making a difference in the world. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of how Ryan is making a difference in the world. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding by how Ryan is making a difference in the world. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support


40

Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how Ryan is making a difference in the world and provides specific and relevant support.


Ryan’s Well – Section B – Question 6

Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to explain why how Ryan is making a difference in the world by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., his building wells).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of how Ryan is making a difference in the world by providing vague support (e.g., he is raising money to buy a well in other contries so they can have clean water to drink). The response requires the reader to connect the support to what it’s intended to prove.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of how Ryan is making a difference in the world by including some accurate support (e.g., Ryan’s frist well was built in 1999 in Africa, when he was 7 years old) and some underdeveloped support (e.g., because he did chores to gave a well to Africa). The response requires the reader to connect the support to what is intended to prove.



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of how Ryan is making a difference in the world by providing specific and relevant support (e.g., he also changes the world by going to 2 dozen countries to tell people about the need for clean water) and explains fully (e.g., he is making wells so people that do not have clean water get’s clean water).

Documents

Assessment of Reading, Writing and Mathematics: Primary ...€¦ · Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how Aldo’s attitude about using the book