Assessment of Reading, Writing and Mathematics: Junior ... · 6/5/2018 · Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing some accurate and relevant support about the

EQAO, 2 Carlton Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5B 2M9 • 1-888-327-7377 • Web site: www.eqao.com • © 2011 Queen’s Printer for Ontario


Assessment of Reading, Writing and Mathematics: Junior Division

Released 2012 Assessment: Language 1, Reading

Item-Specific Rubrics and

Sample Student Responses with Annotations


http://www.eqao.com/



Scoring Guide for Reading Open Response Short Narrative

Johnny Miles’s Marathon Memories – Question 5 Q5: Explain why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview. Use details from the text and your own ideas to support your answer.

Code

Descriptor

B

• Blank: nothing written or drawn in the space provided

I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview).

10

Response attempts to explain why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support.

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of the question by explaining why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection

The response usually requires the reader to connect the support to what it is intended to prove.

30

Response indicates an understanding by explaining why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support.

The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and what it is intended to prove.

40

Response indicates an understanding by providing specific and relevant support from the reading selection to explain fully why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview.


Johnny Miles’s Marathon Memories – Question 5

Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to explain why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., can talk about his successful race).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview by providing vague support (e.g., an outstanding athlete; lots of stories to tell). The reader is required to connect the support to why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview by providing some accurate and relevant support (e.g., he was only 20 years old; he ran a 42.4 kilometere marathon; beat an Olympic Marathon champion by 4 mins). The reader is required to make some connection between the support and why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview.



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing specific (e.g., running the Boston Marathon was his first marathon; going up against a champion the amazing part was that he won) and relevant support (e.g., This shows you can do anything so if people read this they’ll be inspired) to explain fully why Johnny Miles is a good choice for an interview.


Johnny Miles’s Marathon Memories – Question 6 Q6: How do the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner? Use specific details from the text to support your answer.

Code

Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., The quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny

Miles’s experiences as a runner).

10

Response attempts to answer how the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support.

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of how the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding by explaining how the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support.


40

Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner and provides specific and relevant support from the reading selection.



Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to answer how the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., it gives you more info; says important things that Floyd Williston said).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of how the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner by providing vague support (e.g., it tells you when he started running; how he trained). The response requires the reader to connect the support to how the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by explaining how the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner by providing some accurate and relevant support (e.g., by showing his childhood running, and how he practiced by “Miles would get out….horse”). The response requires the reader to make some connections between the support and how it helps the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner.



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by explaining fully how the quotes from Floyd Williston help the reader understand Johnny Miles’s experiences as a runner and provides specific and relevant support (e.g., it tells me what Johnny Mile’s felt when he was running and as he past his hero; when he saw him, how he felt persaverence to win).

Scoring Guide for Reading Open Response Poem

Carousel – Question 11 Q11: Explain why the changes noticed by the speaker have occurred. Use specific examples from the poem and your own ideas to support your answer.

Code

Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., The changes noticed by the speaker have occurred).

10

Response attempts to explain why the changes noticed by the speaker have occurred. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support.

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of why the changes noticed by the speaker have occurred. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding of why the changes noticed by the speaker have occurred. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support.


40

Response indicates an understanding by providing specific and relevant support from the reading selection to explain fully why the changes noticed by the speaker have occurred.


Carousel – Question 11

Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to explain why the changes noticed by the speaker have occurred by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., where’ever this takes place, is old).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of why the changes (e.g., the place was distroyed) noticed by the speaker have occurred by providing vague support (e.g., he went to the carousel before then didn’t come back in a long time). The response requires the reader to connect the support to why the changes noticed by the speaker occurred.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing some accurate and relevant support about the changes (e.g., where the bandstand used to be. And how there is a rusted sighn that says “Pony Rides-15cen…”) to explain why the changes noticed by the speaker have occurred (e.g., the fairground is very old). The reader has to make some connection between the support and why the changes occurred.



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing specific and relevant support (e.g., the park has been shut down; people have forgot about the place) to explain fully why the changes (e.g., things there look recked; “a forrgotten sign”; “Fancy frozen ponies”) noticed by the speaker have occurred.


Carousel – Question 12 Q12: How do the changes to the carousel and surrounding area make the speaker feel? Use specific details from the poem to support your answer.

Code

Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question

10

Response attempts to answer how the changes to the carousel and surrounding area make the speaker feel. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support.

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of how the changes to the carousel and surrounding area make the speaker feel. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding of how the changes to the carousel and surrounding area make the speaker feel. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support.


40

Response indicates an understanding by providing specific and relevant support from the reading selection to explain fully how the changes to the carousel and surrounding area make the speaker feel.



Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to answer how the changes to the carousel and surrounding area make the speaker feel (e.g., sad) by answering aspect of the question (e.g., because the carousel is different).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of how the changes to the carousel and surrounding area make the speaker feel (e.g. sad) by providing limited support (e.g., he was very fond of that particular ride and now it is destroyed). The reader is required to connect the support to why that makes the speaker feel sad.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of how the changes to the carousel and surrounding area make the speaker feel (e.g., upset) by providing some accurate (e.g., She can remember the shiny red paint) and relevant support (e.g., has lots of great memories of the carousel) and some underdeveloped support (e.g., now it is a mess).



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing specific (e.g., The paint is not shiny and the sign has faded) and relevant support (e.g., When the speaker was their before it was the opposite of what it is now; isn’t what he remembers) to explain fully how the changes to the carousel and surrounding area make the speaker feel (e.g., sad).

Scoring Guide for Reading Open Response Informational

Moon Trees – Question 5 Q5: Why does Dave Williams continue to track the Moon Trees? Use information from the text and your own ideas to support your answer.

Code

Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., Dave Williams continues to track the Moon Trees).

10

Response attempts to answer why Dave Williams continues to track the Moon Trees. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support.

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of the question by answering why Dave Williams continues to track the Moon Trees. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding by explaining why Dave Williams continues to track the Moon Trees. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support.


40

Response indicates an understanding by providing specific and relevant support from the reading selection to explain fully why Dave Williams continues to track the Moon Trees.


Moon Trees – Question 5

Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to answer why Dave Williams continues to track the Moon Trees by answering an aspect of the question (e.g., curious of what will happen).



\Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of why Dave Williams continues to track the Moon Trees by providing limited support (e.g., Nasa lost track of how many they gave out and where they planted them).



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing some accurate and relevant support (e.g., he was interested in the expirement and would have wanted to see odd changes) and some underdeveloped support (e.g., they were part of a NASA expirement) to explain why Dave Williams continues to track the Moon Trees.



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing specific and relevant support (e.g., to see if there are any delayed effects that space had on them; to know where these interesting science experiments end up; NASA doesn’t have a central record) to explain fully why Dave Williams continues to track the Moon Trees.


Moon Trees – Question 6 Q6: Explain why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift. Use information from the text and your own ideas to support your answer.

Code

Descriptor

B


I

• Illegible: cannot be read; completely crossed out / erased; not written in English • Irrelevant content: does not attempt assigned question • Off topic: no relationship of written work to the question Typical responses: • do not attempt to answer the question OR • restate the question (e.g., A Moon Tree would be considered a gift).

10

Response attempts to answer why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift. The response either: • answers an aspect of the question OR • does not refer to the reading selection OR • provides inaccurate support.

20

Response indicates a partial understanding of the question by explaining why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift. The response provides: • irrelevant support from the reading selection OR • vague support from the reading selection OR • limited support from the reading selection


30

Response indicates an understanding by explaining why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift. The response includes: • some accurate and relevant support and • some vague or underdeveloped support.


40

Response indicates an understanding by providing specific and relevant support from the reading selection to explain fully why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift.



Code 10

Annotation: Response attempts to answer why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift by providing inaccurate support (e.g., it is Made in places with approprite climits!).



Code 20

Annotation: Response indicates a partial understanding of why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift by providing vague support (e.g., there is not many of them so it is specicle). The reader is required to connect the support to why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift.



Code 30

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding of why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift by providing some accurate and relevant support (e.g., they traveled around the moon 34 times; how many people have trees that went to the moon? Not many) and some underdeveloped support (e.g., and then came back).



Code 40

Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing specific (e.g., because the seeds of those trees had been brought into outer space where there is low gravity and they still grew!) and relevant support (e.g., It would be a good souviner and something to brag about; those trees are probably very rare) to explain fully why receiving a Moon Tree would be considered a gift.

Documents

Assessment of Reading, Writing and Mathematics: Junior ... · 6/5/2018 · Annotation: Response indicates an understanding by providing some accurate and relevant support about the