Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
APPENDIX B
Radiological Assessment
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:14
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:14
Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland An lnst i t i l i id E i reannach urn Chosa int Ra i deo l a i o ch
24* April 2007
Mr. J. Byrne Brunel House North Quay Arklow Co. Wicklow Ireland
Dear Mr. Byrne
I attach a copy of the results of the radiological analyses of samples from Arklow River, Dock Co. Wicklow An Invoice will follow in due course.
The results indicate that dumping of these materials at sea will not result in a radiological hazard.
The Department of the Communication {Pat Corcoran) has been informed and if you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me for assistance.
Y ,*
Yours sincerely
David Pollard Principal Scientific Officer
3 Clonskeagh Square Tel: +353 1269 7766 E-mail: [email protected] Chairman: prof. Eugene Kennedy C/msf(eagh Road Fax: +353 1 269 7437 website: www.Ipii.ie Chief ~ecdlve: DL Ann McGany Dublin 14
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:14
Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland An Inst i t ih id t i r e a n n a c h urn C h o s a i n t R a i d e o l a l o c h
Laboratory Test Report
Report Date: 20fh April 2007
Samples Tested on Behalf of: J P Byrne & Partners Brunel House North Quay Arklow CO Wicklow
Laboratory Analysis: High Resolution Gamma Spectrometry with appropriate density correction
Sample Type: Marine Sediment
Date of Receipt: 22"* March 2007 Date of Analysis 23d March- 13& April 2007
Results:
RPII Client Coordinates Nuclide Activity Reference Reference Concentration
1 (Bq/kg, dry) K-40 722 f 80 1-131 Less than 3
CT07003 56 Sample 1 52.47.51N CS- 134 Less than 2 006.08.67W CS-137 25.9 f 1.4
Ra-226 Less than 80 U-23 5 7*2 U-23 8 66k 12 K-40 526 f 58 1-131 Less than 2
CT0700357 Sample 2 52.47.59N CS-134 Less than 2 006.08.63W CS-1 37 14.2 f 0.8
Ra-226 Less than 86 U-235 1 2 k 3 U-238 261 f 11 K-40 214 f 22 1-131 Less than 1
CT0700358 Sample 3 52.47.66N CS- 134 Lessthan1 ~ . 006.08.69W CS- 1 3 7 5.9 f 0.4 '
Ra-226 Less than 69 U-235 Less than 4 U-238 61 * 4
3 Cronskeagh Square Tel: +353 1 269 7766 E-mail: rpii@rpi\./e Wmm: prof. Eugene Kennedy Clonskeagh Raad Fa: +353 1 269 7437 Wbsite: w.rpn.ie Chief Executive: Dc Ann McGany Dublin 14
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
-
9 An Ins t i t ih id g i reannach urn Chosa int Ra i deo l a i o ch
K-40 439 f 48 1-131 Less than 2
CT0700359 Sample 4 52.47.56N CS- 134 Less than 1 006.08.32W CS-137 8.8 f 0.6
Ra-226 Less than 105 U-23 5 Less than 6 U-23 8 410* 16
Note: (1) Quoted uncertainties are *l SD counting statistics
The Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland received eight samples of sediment fi-om Aquatic Services Unit. The samples were prepared for high-resolution gamma spectrometry by placing an aliquot of sample in a well-defined counting geometry. The sample was measured on a high-resolution gamma spectrometer. Appropriate density corrections were applied to the resultant spectra to take account of the differences in sample density. Dry to wet weight ratios were determined for each sample. Results are quoted on a dry weight basis.
Stephanie Long Laboratory Manager
Notes: This report relates only to the samples tested. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of the Institute The following scientific officers may sign test reports on behalf of the lab manager: Mr David Pollard, Ms Mary Fegan, Mr Kevin Kelleher, Ms Alison Dowdall Where applicable, the number following the symbol * is the combined standard uncertainty and not a confidence interval.
Page 2 of 2 LDC72 3 Clomkeagh Stp~rn Tel: +353 1 269 7766 E-mail: [email protected] Chaiman: Rot Eugene Kennedy Clonskeagh Road Fax: +353 1 269 7437 Website: www.ipii.ie Chief Eimtive: DL Ann McGany Dublin 14
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
c
APPENDIX C1
Ecological Assessment 2007
... x.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
P
” I
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
I
I
I I
1
I
I
I
I li ll
1
ll
. -
Report on a proposed dredge disposal site, Co. Wicklow
Produced by
Aqua-fact International Services Ltd
February 5,2008
A
AQUA-FACT INTERNATIONAL SERVICES Itd 12 KlLKERRlN park T U N rd GALWAY city www.aauafact.le [email protected] tel+353 (0) 91 756812 fax +353 (0) 91 756888
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
A report on a proposed dredge disuosal site, Co. Wicklow. Executive summary JN89
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Aqua-Fact International Services Ltd. was contracted by Arklow Harbour Commissioners to
carry out a sea bed survey at a proposed dredge disposal site north east of Arklow, Co. Wicklow (see
Figure 1 for location map).
* -
Figure I : Site map off the coast of Arklow showing the seven sampling sites.
It is proposed to dispose of 100,000m3 of marine sediment at the site. The used previously as a dredge spoil disposal site.
.”- --
locati,on’had been
1
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A report on a uroDosed dredge disuosal site. Co. Wicklow. Executive summarv JN899
tm This part of the Irish Sea experiences very strong tidal currents with velocities reaching ca 2
m sec-' on Spring tides. These velocities rework the sediments and fine material is exported from the
area. The sediments are therefore characterised by coarse sand, stones, gravels and shell debris. Any
fine material that is disposed off at this site will therefore be exported away fiom this location. From
previous studies, it is known that the area is low in numbers of species and numbers of individuals.
I P
U
P
Sea bed samples were collected at the seven locations shown in the figure and these were
analysed for different types of marine animals including sea WO&, 'shellfish and sea stars etc. and
also for the type of sediment present and the level of organic carbon present. The information was
then analysed using statistical software especially developed for such applications.
The biological survey recorded only 51 species which is a low number compared to some
other areas. This is attributed to the strong hydrodynamic regime that operates in the site causing
organic-rich material to be exported and also giving rise to constant reworking of the sediment.
Organic material is the basic food resource of many marine species and if this resource is only
present in low percentages, there simply is not sufficient food to support a diverse group of animals.
This factor, added to the fact that sediment is being continuously reworked, gives rise to low
numbers of animals and low individual species numbers. None of the animals recorded are
considered as being rare or unusual and the habitat type is not listed in the EU Habitats Directive.
The area is characterised by shelly coarse sands and gravels with low levels of orga&
carbon. This reflects the fast current speeds that occur at the site.
This site has been used in the past as a dredge spoil disposal site. The last time it was used
was ca. 11 years ago. From the findings of this survey, there are no signs of this previous disposal
event.
The disposal of ca 100,OOO tonnes of material at the disposal site will result in the smothering
and destruction of the existing biological community present. The local oceanographic conditions at
the site will cause the deposited material to be redistributed over the area and this will also cause the
disposed sediment to be fully oxidised. Re-colonisation of this sediment will therefore be fast and
may even allow later stage colonisers to establish themselves without requiring the usual pioneering
stages. '
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
JN899 A reDort on a Drouosed dredge disDosai site, Co. Wicklow
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Aqua-Fact International Services Ltd. was contracted by Arklow Harbour Commissioners to
carry out a benthic survey at a proposed dredge disposal site north east of Arklow, Co. Wicklow (see
Figure 1 for location map). The site is situated off the southeast coast of Ireland and lies south of
Mizen Head and water depths range from between 15 - 18 m.
Figure 1 : Site map off the coast of A.rklow showing the seven sampling sites.
1
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A mrt on a Drowsed dredge dismsal site; Co. Wicklow JN899
It is proposed to dispose of 100,000m3 of marine sediment at the site. The location had been
used previously as a dredge spoil disposal site.
1
'1 A
1
2.0 DESK TOP s"JJJY
2.1 Introduction
This part of the Irish Sea experiences very strong tidal currents with velocities reaching ca 2 * *
m sec-' on Spring tides. These velocities rework the sediments and h e material is exported fiom
the area. The sediments are therefore characterised by coarse sand, stones, gravels and shell debris.
Any fine material that is disposed off at this site will therefore be exported away from this location.
Previous studies include Boelens et al. (1 999) and Wilson et al. (2002) and both recorded coarse
sand and shell for this area while Boelens et al. (1999) also comment that the benthic community in
the area is a Venus assemblage. 8
2.2 Fisheries
An accurate representation of fish numbers caught off the Wexford coast, specifically the
study region opposite Courtown, is not possible as the catches landed by Irish boats are brought to a
number of different harbours. Arklow, Wicklow, Kinsale and Wexford are the biggest ports in the
area and the majority of catch would be landed at these ports. According to a BIM fisheries officer
there are no appreciable landings of whitefish into Courtown Harbour. However, finfish tonnages
have varied over recent years as can be seen &om Table 4.6 below.
Harbour 2000 2001 2002
920 1077 393
Courtown 460 425 324
KilmoreQuay 1978 1850 1997
Kinsale 1774 1691 1726
Wexford 266 251 209
Wicklow 2211 4455 6241
A m o w
Table 2.2.1 : CSO statistics showing finfish tonnages into east coast harbours (2000-2004)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A reuort on a promxed dredge dimsal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
The main fisheries in the Courtown area are similar to those of the Arklow bank, Codling
Bank and the numerous sand banks along the south-east coast. Whelk (Bucciniurn andaturn) and
Mussel (Mytilw edulis) dominate, with some mixed white fish trawling (dogfish). The south east
coast has been identified as a herring (Clupea harengus) nursery ground by CEFAS (2000) and the
Marine Institute (1999) reported that herring from this division accounted for 16% of the total
reported Region III pelagic landings of 760,000 tonnes in 1995. Many of the Arklow boats, however
previously used for finfish trawling are now adapted for the more lucrative whelk fishing. Vessels
less than 10 metres in length are not required to declare catches and therefore landing figures may be
underestimated.
2.2 WHELK FISHERY
The whelk fishery in Ireland is mainly concentrated on the Southern Irish Sea where the
whelk is found on mud, sand and gravel banks within five nautical miles of the shore. Landings of
whelk are heavily concentrated on the southeast coast ofthe Irish Sea, fiom Howth Harbour in Co.
Dublin to Came in CO Wexford (52O10' to 53").
This fishery is divided into four regions, see Figure 4.9 below; Dublin (16% of landings up to
1998), Arklow (40% of the whelk catch - The Codling Bank is a substantial part of this sector and it
supports heavy local concentrations of whelk), Courtown (16% of whelk landings) and Wexford
(Densities of whelk in this sector are relatively low - 27% of landings up to 1998). The Courtown
sector extends h m 52" 44' to 52" 25' and lands approximately 16% of the whelk catch. Catches of
between 400 and 500 tonnes have been landed into Courtown in the past number of years. In 1990
total recorded whelk landings for the Southeast coast were 56t and by 1996 they had risen to 6,575t;
after this, landings declined and stabilised at between 3,600 and 4,600 tannually for a short period.
Table 2.2.1 on the following page shows landing data for whelk in southeast fisheries for 2003-2004.
3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
b.
L
II
II I c L
r
c I , -
b
k
I
r
L
A mrt on a ~ m s e d WE e disoosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
Figure 2.2.1: Map showing Southeast coast whelk fishery divided into four sectors (Fahy, 2000).
2003
Arklow 754
courtown 297
Wexford 354.03
KilmoreQuay 4.59
2004
Arklow 675
courtown 300
Wexford 267.02
Kilmore Quay 5.58
Whelk catch quantities in tonnes
Table 2.2.1: Whelk landing data for south-east harbours Erom 2003-2004.
As can be seen the catch quantities have declined considerably over time. However, it must
be reiterated that these figures are not exact as boats less than 10 metres in length do not have to
declare catch quantities and these make up a significant proportion of the vessels fishing for whelk
out of the above harbours.
,
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A r e ~ r t on a Drowsed dredge dismsal site, Co. Wicklow JN899
Rshery locations
Within the coastal areas stretching fiom 52'10' to 53030', whelk are distributed over north-
south orientated mud, sand and gravel banks in strong tidal currents most of which are within 5
nautical miles of shore. The majority of whelk is fished close to the ports at which they are landed
but some are likely to have been fished farther away.
Courtown is a small port, liable to silt up, and its fleet of smaller boats does not venture
firther north than 52O44'. The southern boundary of the Courtom sector is shared with the Arklow
fleet and ArMow vessels often fish within the Courtown sector. Heavy concentrations of whelk are
fished by the Courtown boats. There was some variation in landings into Courtown which, in 1994
contained a large proportion of undersized individuals (Fig 4. lo), their numbers declining until 1997
and then increasing again in 1999.
1990 ?$$2 1994 1996 I!ilW 2000
Figure 2.2.2 : Relative contribution of four sectors of the whelk fishery in the south west Irish Sea to
the total landings. The Arklow sector is largely dependent on the Codling Bank (Fahy, 2002).
Courtown Harbour
According to Fahy et al. (2000) a total of eighteen fishermen are recorded landing whelk
catches into Courtown between 1995 and 1998. Of these, one operator was recorded on only seven
occasions while only six fishermen were continuously recorded for the four-year period, After 1996,
the peak year for landings, the numbers of fishermen declined from fifteen to fourteen in 1997
'.
a-
m
x x
I 5
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
I-
A mrt on a mowsed dredge dimsal site, Co. Wicklow JN899
L diminished M e r to seven in 1998 and to four in 2000. The maximum recorded number of whelk
boats in Courtown was given as eleven; this was &om the early 1990s. I
Following a survey of catches and fishing effort of Courtown fishermen, Fahy et al. (2000)
recorded that the number of pots fished per vessel had not altered. According to Courtown fishermen
there are a number of reasons for the 12- 13 trains per boat with 30 pots per train. Strong currents on
the banks limit the time gear can be left at sea; also smaller Courtown vessels have not been
exchanged for larger boats. Courtown fishermen also consider the &rease in catch tonnages to be
attributed to the reduction in the numbers of vessels within the Courtown sector and therefore a
larger harvest for those remaining (Fahy et al., 2000).
I
1 I I
In the study carried out by Fahy et al. (2002) on dredging of the Codling Bank, the physical
elimination of the benthic community by the removal of the upper sediment in the dredged area was
predicted. However, the widespread nature of the benthos, the limited size of the dredge site (1/800th
I
r
c
- of the Codling Bank) and the short period of disturbance would, it was anticipated, favour a rapid
recolonisation of the area of disturbance. The period of actual recovery would vary with the species
involved. b
Re-settlement by planktonic larvae would be fast. Whelk do not have a planktonic stage, for
which reason local populations acquire distinctive characteristics so that, in theory at least,
recolonisation by whelk would be a relatively slow process (Fahy, et al. 2002).
!!i
!!!I
2.3 MUSSELS !!I!
In mussels, spawning is protracted in many populations in Ireland with a peak of spawning in
spring and summer. A typical life cycle is as follows: resting gonads begin to develop fiom October
to November, gametogenesis occurs throughout winter so that gonads are ripe in early spring. A
partial spawning in spring is followed by rapid gametogenesis; gonads ripen by early summer,
resulting in a less intensive secondary spawning in summer to late August or September (Seed,
1969). Mantle tissues store nutrient reserves between August and October, ready for gametogenesis
in winter when food is scarce (Seed & Suchanek, 1992). Larvae spawned in spring can take
advantage of the phytoplankton bloom. The secondary spawning is opportunistic, depending on
m 1
I favourable environmental conditions and food availability. Gametogenesis and spawking varies with
6
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A mort on a moDosed dredge &md site. Co. Wicklow JN899
geographic location, e.g. southern populations ofien spawn before more northern populations (Seed
& Suchanek, 1992). Reproductive strategies in Mytilus edulis probably vary depending on
environmental conditions (Newell et al., 1982).
Mussel larvae spend 2-4 weeks in the plankton, initially settling on macroalgae and hydroids,
before undertaking secondary migration to form seed beds. These beds generally form on patches of
hard substrata such as cobble and gravel @are 1976). The beds becplqe apparent in spring and early
summer in the intertidal and subtidal zone, and can be very dense. Generally, mussel growth is
initially rapid, but in dense beds, growth decreases and mortality increases over the summer.
Mussels have been observed to release byssal attachments to the substratum possibly due to
physiological stress fkom overcrowding. This, combined with the onset of winter storms, often
disperses the seed beds before the mussels become reproductive (Saurel et al. 2004). However, some
beds, presumed dispersed, may actually be buried under sediment, and mussels may survive over
winter (Mark Grayy CCW, pers. comm.).
Most seed mussel beds are unlikely to produce adult mussels. However, this does not mean
that they have no ecological significance. Small mussels are a food source for a variety of predators,
including starfish (Asterias rubens), shore crabs (Carcinus maenus) and flatfish (flounder
Platichthys Jlesus, plaice Pleuronectes platessa and dab Limanda limanda) @are 1976, Seed 1976,
Seed and Suchanek 1992, Buschbaum 2002). The presence of seed mussel beds is also likely to
affect epifauna and infauna in and around the bed area, as is the case with adult mussel beds
(Beadman et al. 2004).
Harvesting seed mussel beds may be deleterious since it reduces the role that seed mussel
beds play in the ecosystem. However, harvesting may be beneficial, by reducing smothering of
infauna, and by thinning out the mussels and reducing nutritional stress that leads to density
dependent mortality. Harvesting may even allow the survival of seed beds, which would otherwise
be dispersed, in their first winter.
The mussel seed beds occurring on the East Coast are an important fishery resource and are
regularly fished for by boats from Arklow and Wicklow, as well as Wexford boats. The mussel seed
settlement waries annually and have been recorded from the Arklow Bank as well as $0 the southwest
of the India Bank and to the south of the Glassgorman Bank. According to the Department of the 4
7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
1.
A reDort on a movosed dredge diwosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
1
F
li
I'
t!
Marine, the main beds are located at Cahore Point. The mussel seed settlement is unpredictable and
new mussel beds could form on any of the suitable substrates present on the southeast coast. Seed is
taken from these beds and relayed to the commercial mussel aquaculture operations around the
country. Of these mussel seed beds, Cahore Point is the most important. There are approximately 18
boats licensed by the Department of the Marine operating in this area.
According to Bord Iascaigh Mhara, the Irish Sea Fisheries , . Board, Wexford Harbour alone !
produced approximately 8,250 tonnes per annum and the mussels are sold at an average price of
€705 per tonne, totalling €5,816,250 per annum for Wexford Harbour. The mussel industry in
Wexford Harbour also supports 31 full-time jobs, 19 part-time and 8 casual jobs. Further landing
data for Wexford Harbour was provided by the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural
Resources; 6,837 tonnes of blue mussel was landed in 2003 and 5,937 was landed in 2004.
!
Figure 2.3.1: Seed mussel bed locations on the east coast, 1992-2004 (Bord Iascaigh Mhara).
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
I. I- I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I
A mort on a Dromsed dredge dimosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
Whale and Dolphin populations
The Irish Whale and Dolphin Group was contacted by Aqua-Fact International Services Ltd.
in relation to the disopsal of sediments north east of Arklow. The most common cetacean sighted in
the Irish Sea is the Harbour Porpoise. This has been recorded in densities of up to O.l&als per km surveyed. This is considered a predominantly inshore species and h-as been recorded repeatedly
along the coast of the Western Irish Sea from Dublin Bay to Rosslare. Populations of the Harbour
Porpoise have been estimated at ca 20,000 animals off the Southwe& doast of Ireland. The next most
common species recorded in the Irish Sea is the Bottle-Nosed Dolphin, although this is most
commonly recorded f?om the Welsh Coast as opposed to the Western shore of the Irish Sea. Both the
Harbour Porpoise and the Bottle-Nosed Dolphin are listed in Annex I1 of the Habitats Directive.
Both Common and Risso’s Dolphin, Minke whale, Fin whale, Ora, Beaked whales and Pilot
whales are all recorded occasionally in the Irish Sea and have been sighted in the Courtown area.
However, sightings are more common on the South coast in the Celtic Sea. In April 2004 a stranded
beaked whale was recorded fkom the shore near Courtown Strand and again in August 2004 a beaked
whale was washed up at Pollshone Point near Courtown, Co. Wexford. Neither of these have been
positively identified to species level.
SEAL POPULA~ONS
There are two species of seal that occur in Ireland, the Grey Seal and the Common Seal. Both
species are listed in Annex II of the Habitats Directive and also are protected under the Wildlife Act
of 1972.
The Wexford population of Grey seals was estimated at between 450 and 580 animals (Kiely
et al. 2000) and a Grey seal colony exists on Raven Point, near the proposed development. There is
also a colony reported from the small island off Roney Point near Courtown beach. These seals are
expected to use the waters of the proposed development site. I ??le University College Cork carried out a study on the populations of Grey Seals in the Irish
Sea between 1996 and 1998. It included the main fishing harbours of Dunmore East, Helvick, Howth
and Kilmore Quay, all of which were included in the study of seal/ fisheries interactions.
I I
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A remrt on a oro~osed dredge disoosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
Ground counts of annual pup production recorded 177 newborn pups at Irish study sites. The
Great Saltee islands (Co. Wexford) were identified as the most important pupping sites in the South-
eastern Irish Sea. The pup census data collected in Ireland yielded a minimum all-age population
estimate for the Irish Sea of 5,198-6,976 grey seals. This estimate was supported by photo-
identification mark-recapture data which delivered an estimate of 5,613'seals (0.2% CV).
The results of this study underline the site-specific and seasonal
abundance patterns. The largest grey seql haul-outs on the east coast of Ireland
nature of grey seal
were recorded during
the months of July and August, the most important site being Lambay Island, Co. Dublin. Sites on
the south-east coast of Ireland contained significant numbers of grey seals year-round, peaking
during the annual breeding (Sept.-Dec.) and moulting seasons (Nov.-Mar.). The most important of
these sites were the Great Saltee and The Raven Point (Co. Wexford).
No movement of identifiable seals was recorded between sites in Co. Wexford and Co.
Dublin, though, on a smaller scale, individual seals were recorded moving between local sites in east
and south-east Ireland. Repeated photographic captures suggested that adult female grey seals may
show a level of inter-annual faithfulness to particular sites, otherwise known as site fidelity. The
strong associations of individual seals with particular areas were noteworthy at Lambay Island, the
Great Saltee, Coninginore Rocks (Co. Wexford) and Blackrock (Co.Wexford).
. .
2.4 Wexford Reef SAC.
This biogenic reef lies to the north of Wicklow Head and the main species is the tube building
polychaete, Sabellaria alveolata.
10 rn
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A rewrt on a orouosed dredge disposal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
3. RESULTS
3.1 BENTHIC INVESTIGATIONS 3.1.1 METHODOLOGY
SAMPLING
To carry out the assessment of the proposed site, 5 sampling stations were selected within the
site and two were located outside to act as possible reference sites (see, Figure 1). Sampling took
place in June 2007 with 5 replicate samples being taken at each of the 7 stations. An additional
sample was taken for organic carbon and particle size analyses. Initially it was planned to sample
the sea bed remotely using a grab but due to the compact nature of the sediment and the large
quantities of shell, this proved impossible. The samples were therefore recovered by divers using
cores (20 cm diameter, 40 cm long). The following analysis techniques were used for these two
piXaIlleters:
. .
ORGANIC CARBON
Approximately 1 Og of sediment were taken fiom the parent samples for organic carbon
analysis. The organic carbon content of the sediment sample was measured on the total sample
using the chromic acid oxidation method described in Holme and Mchtyre (1 984).
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
Approximately lOOg of sediment were taken fiom a single core sample at each station for
granulometric analysis. The analyses were carried out according to Holme and Mchtyre (1984),
each sample being passed through a nest of graded sieves at intervals of 4.0,2.0, 1.0,0.710,0.500,
0.325,0.250,0.180,0.125,0.090 and 0.063mm. Each grade was weighqd and the value expressed
as a percentage of the dry weight of the total sample.
11
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
I'
' A reDort on a DroDosed dredge dimosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
I Stations were located using DGPS, this positioning method is accurate to within cu. lm.
Refer to Table 3.2.2 for station coordinates. I!
1
l 2 3
It
I
52.850
52.799
52.822
52.829
52.828
52.837
52.829
6.048
6.0793
6.0605
6.0705
6.0588
6.0588
6.0471
1 6 . 4
. . 1 4 . 3
1 7 . 1
15.9
16.7
16.9
17.3
Table 3.2.2: Subtidal cores sample station co-ordinates, June 2007.
SEDIMENT GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION SCHEME
The Udden-Wentworth (commonly called the Wentworth scale) grade scale was used for
classifling the diameters of sediments analysed in the current work (see Table 3.2.3). Particles
larger than 64 mm in diameter are classified as cobbles. Smaller particles are pebbles, granules,
sand and silt. Those smaller than 0.0039 mm are clay. It remains the grade scale that is most
commonly used by geologists and geomorphologists, although somewhat different particle size
classifications are used by soil scientists and engineers. The "phi scale" is a commonly-used
modification of the Wentworth system that allows the use of simple whole numbers for class
boundaries by applying the logarithmic transform: phi = -log2d, where d is the particle diameter.
I
r e%:-'-. n
12
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A reDort on a Droposed dredee disposal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
Table 3.2.3: The Udden-Wentworth scale (Wentworth, 1922) - the sediment granulometry scheme
followed for the particle size analysis (see Table 3.2.2.1 for results).
DIVE SURVEY
At each of the benthic sampling sites experienced scientific divers attempted to carry out a visual survey of the sea-bed for the presence of surface-dwelling species e.g. starfish, lobsters etc. - Benthic communities observed during the dive survey were to be described as well as description of
plant and animal species observed. Due to high levels of suspended sediment in the water at the
time of the survey visibility was extremely poor. Under these conditions it was not possible to take
representative photographs of the seafloor in this area, nor was it possible to make a record of visual
observations taken at the various sampling sites. The description of the animal and plant
communities present here is therefore based on the results provided by the dive core sampling
portion of the survey.
BENTHIC FAUNAL ANALYSIS
Data on each sample, e.g. station number, water depth, date, depth of sediment, smell, colour
and visible macrofauna were logged in a field notebook. Each replicate core for the famd returns
was wet-sieved on a lmm mm mesh sieve not more than 24 hours after collection, stained with a i
p g v * . . 13
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
. A report on a Dmmsed dredge disposal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
IJ
ll
I1 It n n
II
--
IJ
I1
vital dye, fixed with 10% buffered formalin and preserved in 70% alcohol. Samples were then sorted
under a microscope (x 10 magnification), into five main groups: Polychaeta, Mollusca, Crustacea
and others. The taxa were then identified to species level where possible and counted. Refer to
Appendix I for a complete species list. Statistical evaluation was undertaken using PlRIMER
analysis techniques.
A data matrix of all the faunal abundance data was compiled and later used for statistical
analyses. The faunal analysis was carried out using the PRIMER @'(Plymouth Routines in
Multivariate Ecological Research) programme.
Univariate statistics in the form of diversity indices were calculated. The following diversity
indices were calculated:
1) Margalef's species richness index @), (Margalef, 1958). s-1 D=-
lo&N
where: N is the number of individuals
S is the number of species
2) Pielou's Evenness index (J), (Pielou, 1977).
H' (observed) J=
H- where: HI- is the maximum possible diversity, which could be achieved if all
species were equally abundant (= log2S)
3) Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H'), (Pielou, 1977).
where: PI is the proportion of the total count accounted for by the i* taxa
Species richness is a measure of the total number of species present for a given number of
individuals. Evenness is a measure of how evenly the individuals are distributed amang different
species. The diversity index incorporates both of these parameters. Richness ranges ftom 0 (low
richness) to 12 (high richness), evenness ranges fiom 0 (low evenness) to 1 (high evenness),
diversity ranges from 0 (low diversity) to 5 (high diversity). '
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
I
I ' i
A reDort on a Drowsed dredge disaosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
The PRIMER Q programme (Clarke & Warwick, 2001) was used to cany out multivariate
analyses on the station-by-station faunal data. All species/abundance data were fourth root
transformed and used to prepare a Bray-Curtis similarity matrix in PRIMER@. The fourth root
transformation was used, in order to down-weigh the importance of the highly abundant species and
allows the mid-range and rarer species to play a part in the similarity calculation. The similarity
matrix was then used in classificatiodcluster analysis. The aim of this analysis was to find "natural
groupings' of samples, i.e. samples within a group that are more s&il& to each other, than they are
similar to samples in different groups (Clarke & Warwick, Zoc. cit.). The PRIMER @ programme
CLUSTER carried out this analysis by successively fusing the samples into groups and the groups
into larger clusters, beginning with the highest mutual similarities then gradually reducing the
similarity level at which groups are formed. The result is represented graphically in a dendrogram,
the x-axis representing the full set of samples and the y-axis representing similarity levels at which
two samples/groups are said to have fused.
The Bray-Curtis similarity matrix was also subjected to a non-metric multi-dimensional
scaling (MDS) algorithm (Kruskal& Wish, 1978), using the PRTMER @ program MDS. This
programme produces an ordination, which is a map of the samples in two- or three-dimensions,
whereby the placement of samples reflects the similarity of their biological communities rather than
their simple geographical location (Clarke & Warwick, 2001). With regard to stress values, they
give an indication of how well the multi-dimensional similarity matrix is represented by the two-
dimensional plot. They are calculated by comparing the interpoint distances in the similarity matrix
with the corresponding interpoint distances on the 2-d plot. Perfect or near perfect matches are rare
in field data, especially in the absence of a single overriding forcing factor such as an organic
enrichment gradient. Stress values increase not only with the reducing dimensionality (lack of clear
forcing structure), but also with increasing quantity of data (it is a sum of the squares type regression
coefficient). Clarke and Warwick (Zoc. cit.) have provided a classification of the reliability of M D S plots based on stress values, having compiled simulation studies of stress value behaviour and
archived empirical data. This classification generally holds well for 2-d ordinations of the type used
in this study. Their classification is given on the following page:
0 Stress value < 0.05: Excellent representation of the data with no prospgct of
misinterpretation. - 4
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
I ’
I
I
8 Stress value < 0.10: Good representation, no real prospect of misinterpretation of
overall structure, but very fine detail may be misleading in compact subgroups.
Stress value C0.20: This provides a useful 2-d picture, but detail may be
misinterpreted particularly nearing 0.20.
Stress value 0.20 to 0.30: This should be viewed withscepticism, particularly in
the upper part of the range, and discarded for a small to moderate number of
points such as < 50.
Stress values > 0.30: The data points are close to being randomly distributed in
the 2-d ordination and not representative of the underlying similarity matrix.
.
8
8
. - 8
Each stress value must be interpreted both in terms of its absolute value and the number of
data points. In the case of this study, the moderate number of data points indicates that the stress
value can be interpreted more or less directly. While the above classification is arbitrary, it does
provide a framework that has proved effective in this type of analysis.
3.2.2 RI%SULTS
3.2.2.1 ORGANIC CARBON
Results for sedimentology and organic carbon analysis are presented in Table 3.2.2.1.
Organic carbon levels were very low throughout with all samples having values of 0.23% or lower. -
GRAVEL 56.1 24.1 323 25.1 ” 36.2 20.7 55 v.COARSESAND 2-1 7.4 9.1 COARSESAND 1 - 0.5 7.8 123
MEDIUMSAND 0.5 - 0.25 18.4 19.5 FINESAND 0.25 - 0.125 9.7 31.2 v. FINE SAND 0.125 - 62p 0.4 2.2 SILT ==62P 0.2 1.6
ORGANIC CARBON CAOV 0.13 0.06
8.4 93
9.5 10.5
14.7 15.9 31.7 35.6
2.1 2.4
1.4 1.3 0.12 0.23
9 4 9.1 10.4 5.3 7.1
15.3 20.1 15.6 26.1 46.5 12.3
1.7 2.1 0.6 1.1 1.4 0.3
0.11 0.04 0.12
Table 3.2.2.1: Sediment granulometry and organic carbon results for the seven subticlal core stations
surveyed north of Arklow, June, 2007.
16
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
I c I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
t
I
A reDort on a uroposed dredge disoosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
3.2.2.2 SEDIMENT PARTICLE SIUE ANALYSIS
The results show that the core samples may be classified as either gravel or fine sand.
Stations 1,3,5 and 7 were dominated by gravel and stations 2,4 and 6 were dominated by fine sand.
Low levels of very fine sand, silt and organic carbon were observed at all stations (see Table
3.2.2.1). While sieving the samples, large numbers of old oyster shell where present and sometimes
in high numbers. Stations 2 to 6 are somewhat finer than Stations 1 and 7 (see Figure 3.2.2.2 for a
graphic representation of granulometry at the seven sites). Gravelhoarse fractions were found at all
of the stations sampled.
100
90 80
70 60 50
48
30
20 10
0
Silt
P' V. fine sand
Fine sand
Medium sand
Coarse sand
V. coarse sand
Gravel
Figure 3.2.2.2: Graphic representation of the granulometry results of sediments at each of the seven
sampling stations in June 2007 (see Figure 1 for core site locations).
3.2.2.3 BENTHIC FAUNAL hALYSKS
The taxonomic identification of the benthic infauna across all 7 stations sampled in the
survey yielded a total count of 51 species, ascribed to 7 phyla. A complete listing of these species
abundance is provided in Appendix I. Of the 5 1 species enumerated, 2 were anthozoans, there was 1
nemertean, 35 were polychaetes (segmented worms), 1 species was a sipunculid, 4 were crustaceans
(crabs, shrimps, prawns), 3 were molluscs (mussels, cockles, snails etc.) and 5 were echinoderms
(brittlestars, sea cucumbers). i
17
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A reDort on a Drowsed dredge disposal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
I
r I
b
t .
P'
bi
UNIVARIATE ANAtYSES
Univariate statistical analyses were carried out on the station-by-statiodsample-by-sample
faunal data. The following parameters were calculated and can be seen in Table 3.2.2.3; species
numbers, number of individuals, richness, evenness and diversity. The numbers of species ranged
from 12 (Station 5) to 24 (Station 2). Number of individuals ranged from 34 (Station 7) to 67
(Station 2). Richness ranged from 2.63 (Station 5) to 5.47 (Station 2). Evenness ranged from 0.78
(Station 4) to 0.90 (Station 2). Diversity ranged from 2.88 (Station 4) to 4.13 (Station 2). The values
of the diversity indices and associated evenness indicate that the fahaa t the sites are well balanced
and there is not an over-dominance of one species over the others.
Table 3.2.2.3: Diversity indices €or the seven sampling stations sampled in June 2007.
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES
The dendrogram and the M D S plot can be seen in Figures 3.2.2.1 and 3.2.2.2 respectively.
The faunal data for each of the 5 replicates at each of the seven sites were combined into one data set
and this .was used to generate a dendrogram and MDS.
1, 18
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A reoort on a oromed dredge disoosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
201 40
JN899 ARKLOW DUMPSITE GROUPED
I
Figure 3.2.2.1. Dendrogram showing the spatial relationship between the f a d data at the seven
stations sampled to the northeast of Arklow, June 2007.
The dendrogram shows that two sites to the east of the proposed disposal site are more like
one another than the 5 either within the disposal box or south of it. Within the proposed site, Stations
2 and 3 h e at a level of just over 60% similarity while Stations 4,5 and 6 separate fiom this latter
pair at a level of ca. 50% similarity. Stations 4 and 5 are most similar separating at a level of ca 70%
similarity.
ST. 3
Stress: D.01
ST. 7
ST. 2
ST. 1 ST. 6
Figure 3.2.2.2. M D S plot showing the spatial relationship between the faunal data at the'seven
stations sampled to the northeast of Arklow, June 2007.
19
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A reDort on a prouosed dredge disposal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
The MDS plot (Figure 3.2.2.2) had a stress level of 0.01, this represents an excellent
representation of the data with no prospect of misinterpretation. Stations1 and 7 lie on the right hand
side of the plot while all stations within the disposal site group to the left with Stations 4 and 5 being
most closely aligned.
3.2.3 DISCUSSION . *
The selection of reference sites can be problematic as the issue of similarity between the
areas being compared has to be taken into consideration. For this reason the two sites to the north
and to the south of the disposal area are termed “potential reference sites” in the introduction to this
section. No predictive model of the disposal site was available for examination to help select
potential reference sites. Water depth within the disposal site and to the north and south is all less
than 20 meters while to the east of the disposal site depth is greater than 20 meter; for this reason,
locating reference site to the east of the disposal site was not considered. As the Irish Sea in this area
is known to be quite turbid, the reference sites were located at distances that were considered to be
suf€iciently far from the proposed site to ensure that the heavier sediments would have settled out
and that only the finer sediments would still be in suspension.
The numbers of species and individuals returned were relatively poor and this is attributed to
the strong hydrodynamic regime that operates in the site causing organic-rich material to be exported
from the site and also giving rise to constant reworking of the sediment. Examination of the faunal data shows that only a small number (8 out of 5 1 taxa) were suspension feeders ; 21 species were
deposit feeders and the remainder being carnivores or microdetritivores. Organic material is the
basic food resource of many epi- and infaunal marine invertebrate taxa and if this resource is only
present in low percentages, there simply is not sufficient food to support a diverse and density-rich
benthic assemblage. This factor added to the fact that sediment is being continuously reworked gives
rise to low numbers of taxa and low individual species numbers. None of the taxa recorded are
considered as being rare or unusual and the habitat type is not listed in the EU Habitats Directive.
,
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A report on a uromsed dredge disuosal site, Co. Wicklow JN899
4.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS
Biological succession
Dredging and the disposal of spoil, by their very nature, affect the environment. Man-made
changes of this type are an interference with, and will have an effect on, the balance of nature (Bray
et al. 1997). Spoil disposal temporarily increases turbidity, influences . - .bottom-feeding communities at
and near the disposal site, and may affect the behaviour and physiology of fish and other marine
organisms. Toxic pollutants may be redistributed resulting in their increased availability to aquatic
life. One of the most obvious effects of spoil disposal is an increase in organic matter loadiig. This is
one of the most documented forms of disturbance to cause changes in redox chemistry, leading to
eutrophication and hypoxia (e.g. Rosenberg, 1976,1977; Rosenberg & Loo, 1988; Rosenberg et al. , 1992; Dim & Rosenberg, 1995). The excessive accumulation of dissolved and/or particulate organic
matter causes a parallel rise in the rate of oxygenic decomposition and mineralisation (i.e. biological
and chemical oxygen demand) that comprises the assimilative capacity of the system (Omori et al. , 1994). Under these conditions, benthic pore water oxygen is one of the first electron acceptors to
become exhausted (then NO3, M n 0 2 , FeOOH, SO4 and C02; Aller, 1982). This results in the
lowering of biologically available oxygen and, in turn, a reduction in the turnover rate of organic
decomposition (Delaune et al., 198 1 ; Fisher, 1982). Where the consumption of electron acceptors is
sufficient, the RPD‘ (Redox Potential Discontinuity; transition zone separathg a lower layer of
anaerobic sediment from an upper layer of surficial aerobic sediment) becomes shallower and in
cases of high impact the RPD can reach the sediment surface. With this, the resident aerobic
macrofauna are forced upwards in search of areas of higher oxygen levels (e.g. Rosenberg et al.,
1991; Nilsson, 1998) and to avoid the underlying toxic effect of reduced- compounds including
dissolved species of sulphide and precipitated metals (Theede et al., 1969; Fenchel & Reid, 1970). If these geochemical conditions persist beyond the physiological tolerance time of the resident infauna,
high mortality ensues and the community switches to one dominated by a limited number of species
(e.g. Bagge, 1969; Weston, 1990; Forbes et al., 1994). To accompany this progressive deterioration
of the sedimentary habitat the benthic faunal character (i.e. abundance, biomass, size, number of
species and trophic status) changes.
The faunal response may be characterised as a decrease in the density of the ips' 1
opportunistic families and a major increase in the density of families with the most opportunistic
21
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
h ‘
A reoort on a omposed dredge disoosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
h lifestyle (Harvey et al., 1998). Both direct burial by dredge spoil discharged in large quantities within
a short time interval and an enhanced food supply are the two factors that may explain the changes in
density in various families. Pearson & Rosenberg (1 976) summarised these changes. They
highlighted that irrespective of boreal geographical location, benthic organic enrichment caused a
predictable and sequential change in the characteristics of the resident macrofauna and associated
sedimentary regime. Rhoads et al. (1 978) extended this to include changes in faunal composition
over time following a physical disturbance. In either case, the degree of disturbance encountered
along a perturbation gradient has been shown to differentially influence the biological structure of the
sediment (Gray et al., 1990). Most benthic habitats codorm to this successional paradigm and
therefore it has resulted in a formal, albeit qualitative, conceptual model (Fig 4.1) o f benthic
macrofaunal succession applicable to natural, physical and anthropogenic perturbations in space or
time (Pearson & Rosenberg, 1978). The effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbance on marine
ecosystems have been well documented in the scientific literature.
R
1 1 ’ . *
i
According to the Pearson-Rosenberg model, sediments threatened by ‘gross pollution’ (i.e.
‘GP’, Figure 1.1) are characterised by high levels of labile organic matter, an absent or shallow RPD, a high microbial oxygen demand (Yamamoto & Lopez, 1985; Berman et al., 1994), and a milieu o f
reduced toxicants. Ifthese conditions persist over time, total defamation of the sediment occurs, and
the surface layers may become laminated through the lack o f infaunal mixing and the accumulation
of bacterial mats and decomposing ‘floc’ (Rumohr, 199Ob; Tyson & Pearson, 1991; Rosenberg &
Dim, 1993; Rumohr et al., 1996). At some distance in space or time, a transition takes place fiom
being ‘grossly polluted‘ to being ‘polluted’ (i.e. ‘P’, Figure 4.1). By this stage, the sediment content
of labile organic matter has declined and the formerly anoxic or hypoxic sediment has being replaced
by oxic conditions in the uppermost layers of the profile. This allows small ‘opportunistic’ species
r F I
f
1 (e.g. polychaetes Capitella spp. and PoZydoru spp.) that have a physiological requirement for
sediment containing high levels of organic matter to colonise the surface layer (Gray, 1981; Forbes &
Lopez, 1990; Tsutsumi et al., 1990; Forbes et. al., 1994). These species have the ability to respond
rapidly to environmental perturbation by switching fiom a planktonic mode of reproduction to
benthic lecithotrophy when low oxygen and high sulphide levels are encountered (Gray, 1980;
Forbes et al., 1994). Few organisms follow this life style strategy so there is a tendency for a limited
number of species to reach extremely high densities in the presence o f pollutants. The bioturbatory
activities of these infauna start to significantly modi@ the physical, chemical and biological nature of the deposit (see, inter alia, Gray, 1974,1979; Rhoads, 1974; Rhoads et al., 1977; A1
I 1
E 22
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A report on a vrovosed dredge disposal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
Rhoads & Boyer, 1982; Krantzberg, 1985; Snelgrove & Butman, 1994). These bioturbatory activities
form holes, tubes and burrows in the sediment and the biologically mediated circulation and
incorporation of oxygenated water into the sediment stimulate aerobic microbial decomposition of
organic material and increase the depth of oxygen penetration into the sediment (Lyons et al., 1979;
Yingst & Rhoads, 1980). The macrofaunal assemblage enters a ‘transitory’ phase of succession (i.e.
‘T’, Figure 4.1) when the sedimentary changes allow further colonization of a larger variety of
species. This stage is unfavorable for the ‘pioneer’ population to persist. Species that characterise the
transitory sere (e.g. Mirza & Gray, 198 1) include suspension and deposit feeding bivalves (e.g.
riyusiru spp., CorbuZa spp.), ‘conveyor belt’ polychaetes (e.g. ScoZopZos spp., Amphictene spp.,
CZymeneZZa spp.), and relatively immobile holothurians (e.g. Leptosynaptu spp., Leptopentuctu spp.,
riyone spp.). Here again the physical and chemical properties of the sediment are further modified
by the new infaunal dominants making way for additional species to take hold. A more complicated
and persistent faunal assemblage now forms and evolves towards an ‘equilibrium’ or ‘climax’
community status (= ‘normal’; ‘N7, Figure 4.1). Sediments at the ‘equilibrium’ stage are
characterised by ‘‘burrow complexes of large species such as Nephrops nowegicus, Brissopsis Zyveru
and ScuZibregmu inflaturn intermingled with smaller tube dwelling and burrowing species” that
together depress and maintain the RPD at depths in excess of lOcm (Pearson & Rosenberg, 1978).
The taxa inhabiting this sere are characterised by large body size, long life spans, a large assimilative
capacity and a wider range of functional types than exhibited by taxa in the earlier successional
series.
Fig 4 1 : Diagrammatic representation of the predictable and sequential changes in makrofaunal
structure and sedimentary characteristics that accompany a change in the level of organic enrichment
23
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A reDort on a prooosed dredge disposal site. Co. Wicklow m899
or that follow a natural or anthropogenic perturbation event. Oxidised sediment (OS) is separated
from the reduced sediment (RS) by the redox potential discontinuity (RPD). Spatial and temporal
phases; GP, grossly polluted; P, polluted; T, transitory; N, normal. Modified fkom Pearson and
Rosenberg (1 976,1978).
Effects of Dredging & Dumping
Marine soft bottom macrobenthic communities occupy one of the most extensive open water
habitats in coastal ecosystems (Thorson, 1957; Peres, 1982). Within these communities, analysis of
differences in benthic community structure is one of the mainstays of detecting and monitoring the
biological effects of marine pollution and habitat disturbance (Warwick & Clarke, 1993).
Macrobenthic organisms are very often used as biological foci in these analyses, as the majority have
limited powers of locomotion, thereby acting as natural biological indicators of environmental stress.
The relationship of marine macrobenthic community structure to environmental disturbance is
complicated because these communities are often patchy in distribution and variable in time
(Carriker, 1967; Pearson & Rosenberg, 1978).
Many species have adapted strategies to survive the fkequent natural disturbances, which they
are subjected to, i.e. storms, currents (Rhoads, 1974). The sudden deposition of significant quantities
of spoil material on the shallow seafloor buries and often kills the benthic fauna. The impact of water
column turbidityhelease of toxins caused by disposal of spoil material is for the most part
insignificant (Saucier et al., 1978); however it may affect benthic processes by reducing light
intensity and increasing sedimentation rates (Toumazis, 1995). Survival and subsequent repopulation
primarily depends on depth of burial, properties of the deposited materid and natural sediment and
functional groupings of indigenous faunas (Young & Richardson, 1998).
Laboratory and field studies have shown that mobile deposit feeders can often survive burial
of up to 5Ocm of spoil material and reach the new sediment surface in a few hours to days (Nichols
et al., 1978; Mauer et al., 1978). Less mobile surface deposit feeders and suspension feeders,
especially sessile forms have very limited abilities to migrate to the sediment-water interface
resulting from such a depositional event. Harvey et al., (1 998) reported a faunal response as being
characterised by a decrease in the density of the less opportunistic families and a majbr increase in
the densities of families with the most opportunistic lifestyle. Both direct burial by spoil material, in
rl. 24
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A report on a Drowsed dredge disposal site.'&. Wicklow JN899
large quantities over a short time interval and an enhanced food supply were said to be the two
factors which might explain the changes in densities in the various families. Survival rates are
greatest when the spoil material is similar in nature to the natural sediment, i.e. sand on sand, mud on
mud (Kranz, 1974; Saucier et al., 1978).
Repopulation of defaunated sites occurs by larval recruitment and by adult migration from
adjacent undisturbed benthic communities (Santos & Simon, 1980). The spatial and temporal scales
of successional change resulting fiom waste deposition have been measured for shallow water
marine benthos (Rosenberg, 1976; Pearson & Rosenberg, 1978, Rhoads et al, 1978; Arntz &
Rumohr, 1982). Benthic recolonisation of dredge spoil sites may be as rapid as 3 months for fine-
grained sediments but may require up to 3 years for coarse-grained sediments (Saucier et al., 1978).
Harvey et al. (1 998) reported a recovery time of more than 2 years for a disturbed area to re-establish
a sediment composition and a macrobenthic community structure similar to undisturbed background
levels. A new deposit is subjected to biogenic reworking, i.e. bioturbation, and is thereby changed in
. *
terms of its physical properties and attendant dominant geochemistry processes (Rhoads, 1974). The
first species to repopulate disturbed sites are pioneering species, often short lived, tube dwelling
polychaetes and amphipods, which tend to stabilize the sediment sufface (Rhoads & Young, 1970).
Over time longer lived, deeper dwelling deposit feeders and carnivores repopulate the deposit,
species diversity increases and an equilibrium assemblage is established (Rhoads & Gennano, 1982).
This site has been used in the past as a dredge spoil disposal site. The last time it was used
was ca. 1 1 years ago. From the findings of this survey, there are no signs of this previous disposal
event.
In conclusion, the disposal of ca 100,000 m3 of material at the disposal site will result in the
smothering and destruction of the existing biological community present. The local oceanographic
conditions at the site will cause the deposited material to be redistributed over the area and this will
also cause the disposed sediment to be fully oxidised. Recolonisation of this sediment will therefore
be fast and may even allow later stage colonisers to establish themselves without requiring the usual
pioneering stages.
C8---------------td.
25 eg'
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A reDort on a Droposed dredge disposal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
References
c Aller, R. C. (1982). The effects of macrobenthos on chemical properties of marine sediment and overlying water. In: McCall, P. L. and M. J. S. Tevesz (eds.). Animal-Sediment Relations. New York. Plenum Press. pp.53-102. c
Aller, R. C. (1994). Bioturbation and remineralization of sedimentary organic matter: Effects of redox oscillation. Chemical Geology 114: 33 1-45.
Arntz, W.E. and H. Rumohr (1982). An experimental study of macrobenthic colonization and succession and the importance of seasonal variation in temperate lititudes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 64: 17-45. I'
Bagge, P. (1 969). The succession of the bottom communities in polluted estuarine habitats. Limnologica 7 (1): 87-94.
Bray, R. N., Bates A. D. and J. M. Land (1997). Dredging. A handbook for engineers. Butterworth- Heinemann. pp.434.
Carriker, M. R. (1967). Ecology of estuarine benthic invertebrates; a perspective. Ln: Lauff, G. H., (eds.). Estuaries. Washington DC. American Association for Advanced Science Publication, No. 83. pp.442-87.
i De Laune, R. D., Reddy C. N. and W. H. Patrick (1981). Effect of pH and redox potential on
concentration of dissolved nutrients in an estuarine sediment. Jounal of Environmental Quality 10 (3): 276-79. f
Diu, R. J. and R. Rosenberg (1995). Marine benthic hypoxia: A review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology-Annual Review 33: 245-303.
Fenchel, T. M. and R. J. Reid (1970). The sulphide system: a new biotic community underneath the oxidised layer of marine sand bottoms. Marine Biology 7: 255-68.
c' Fisher, J. B. (1982). Effects of macrobenthos on fkeshwater sediment diagenesis. In: McCall, P. L. and M. J. S. Tevesz (eds.). Animal-sediment relations - the biogenic alteration of sediments. Topics in Geobiology V01.2. New York. Plenum Press.
I' Forbes, T. L. and G. Lopez (1 990). The effects of food concentration, body size and environmental oxygen tension on the growth of the deposit feeding polychaete, Capitella species 1. Limnology and Oceanography 35 (7): 1535-44.
c Gray, J. S. (1 974). Animal-sediment relationships. Oceanography and Marine Biology-Annual Review 12: 223-61. c
Gray, J. S. (1 979). Pollution-induced changes in populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 286: 545-61.
b
i a c v t d . Q"" i 26
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:15
A re~ort on a DrODOSed dredge disposal site. Co. Wicklow M899
Gray, J. S. (1980). The measurement of effects o f pollutants on benthic communities. Rapp. Rev. Rbun. Cons. Int. lhplor. Mer. 179: 188-93.
Gray, J. S. (1981). Detecting pollution induced changes in communities using the log-normal distributions of individuals among species. Murine Pollution Bulletin 12 (5): 173-76.
Gray, J. S., Clarke, K. R., Warwick R. M. and G. Hobbs (1990). Detection o f initial effects of pollution on marine benthos: an example fiom the Ekofish and Eldfisk oilfields, North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 66: 285-99.
Harvey, M., Gauthier D. and J. Munro (1998). Temporal changes in the ccimposition and abundance o f the macro-benthic invertebrate communities at dredged material disposal sites in the Anse i Beaufils, Baie des Chaleurs, eastern Canada. Marine Pollution Bulletin 36 (1): 41-55.
Kranz, P. M. (1974). The antistrophic burial o f bivalves and its paleoecological significance. Journal of Geology 82: 237-65.
Krantzberg, G. (1985). The influence of bioturbation on physical, chemical and biological parameters in aquatic environments: A review. Environmental Pollution (Series A) 39: 99- 102.
Lyons, W. B., Gaudette, H. E. and P. B. Armstrong (1979). Evidence for organically associated iron in nearshore pore fluids. Nature 282: 202.
Mauer, D. L., Keck, R. T., Tinsman, J. C., Leathem, W. A., Wethe, C. A., Huntzinger, M., Lord C., and T. M. Church (1978). Vertical migration o f benthos in simulated dredged material overburden, Vol. I. Marine Benthos. US. Army Engineer Waterways Exp. Sta., Vicksburg, MS,. Vichburg, MS,. DMRP Tech. Rep. TR 0-78-35. pp.97
Mirza, F. B. and J. S. Gray (1981). The fauna of benthic sediments fiom the organically enriched Oslofjord, Norway. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 54: 181-207.
Nichols, J.A., Rowe, G. T., Clifford C. H. and R.A. Young (1978). In situ experiments on the burial o f marine invertebrates. Journal of Sedimentology and Petrology 48: 419-26.
Nilsson, H. C. (1998). Marine benthic macrofaunal response to oxygen deficiency. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept. of Marine Ecology. Goteborg University, Sweden.
Nilsson, H. C. and R. Rosenberg (1997). Benthic habitat quality assessment of an oxygen stressed fjord by surface and sediment profile images. Journal of Marine Systems 11 (3-4): 249-64.
Omori, R. L., Hirano T. and H. Takeoka (1 994). The limitations to organic loading on a bottom of a coastal ecosystem. Marine Pollution Bulletin 28 (2): 73-80.
Pearson, J.S. and R. Rosenberg. (1976). A comparative study of the effects on the marine environment of wastes from cellulose industries in Scotland and Sweden. Ambio 5 (2): 77-79.
,
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:16
A re~ort on a promsed dredge dimosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
Pearson, T. H. and R. Rosenberg (1978). Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biologv-Annual Review. 16: 229-3 1 1 .
Peres, J. M. (1982). Marine ecology A comprehensive integrated treatise on life in oceans and coastal waters. In: Kinne, 0. Chapters 2-9. Vol. V, Part I, (eds.). New York. John Wiley and
, Sons.
Rhoads, D. C. (1974). Organism-sediment relations on the muddy sea floor. Oceanography and Marine Biology-Annual Review 12: 263-300.
* -
Rhoads, D. C. and D. K. Young (1970). The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on sediment stability and community trophic structure. Journal of Marine Research 28: 150-78.
Rhoads, D. C. and L. F.Boyer (1982). The effects of marine benthos on physical properties of sediments. A successful perspective. In: McCall, P. L. and M. J. S. Tevesz (eds.). Animal- sediment relations - the biogenic alteration of sediments. Topics in Geobiology Vol. 2. New
I York. Plenum Press. pp.3-52.
Rhoads, D. C. and J. D. German0 (1982). Characterination of organism-sediment relations using sediment profiling imaging: an efficient method of remote ecological monitoring of the seafloor (RemotsTM System). Marine Ecololgical Progress Series 8: 1 15-28.
Rhoads, D. C., Aller, R. C. and M. B. Goldhaber (1977). The influence of colonising benthos on physical properties and chemical diagenesis of the estuarine seafloor. In. Coull, B.C. (eds.). Ecology of marine benthos. University of South Carolina Press, USA. pp.113-38.
Rhoads, D. C., McCall, P. L. and J. Y. Yingst (1978). Disturbance and production on the estuarine seafloor. American Scientist. (66): 577-586.
Rosenberg, R. (1 976). Benthic faunal dynamics during succession following pollution abatement in a Swedish estuary. Oikos 27: 141-27.
Rosenberg, R. (1977). Benthic macrofaunal dynamics, production and dispersion in an oxygen- deficient estuary of west Sweden. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 26: 107- 33.
Rosenberg, R. and R. J. Dim (1993). Sulfur bacteria (Beggiatoa Spp.) mats indicate hypoxic conditions in the Inner Stockholm Archipelago. Ambio 22: 32-36.
Rosenberg, R. and L-0. Loo( 1988). Marine eutrophication induced oxygen deficiency: Effects on soft bottom fauna, western Sweden. Opheliu 29 (3): 213-25.
Rosenberg, R., Hellman, B. and B. Johansson (1991). Hypoxic tolerance of marine benthic fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 79: 127-3 1.
Rosenberg, R., Loo, L-0. and P. M6ller (1992). Hypoxia, salinity and temperature as qtructuring factors for marine benthic communities in a eutrophic area. Netherlands Journal of Sea'Research 30: 121-29.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:16
A report on a provosed dredge disvosal site. Co. Wicklow JN899
Rumohr, H. (199Ob). Photographic evidence of changes in the sediment. Ambio Special Report 7 : 11-12.
Rumohr, H., Bonsdorff, E. and T. H. Pearson (1996). Zoobenthic succession in Baltic sedimentary habitats. Archive of Fishery and Marine Research 44 (3): 179-214.
Santos, S. L. and J. L. Simon (1980). Marine soft-bottom community establishment following annual
Saucier, R. T., Calhoun, C. C., Engler, R. M., Path, T. R. and H. R. smith (1978). Executive overview and detailed summary synthesis of research results, Dredged Material Research Program. US. Engineer Waterways Exp. Sta. Vicksburg, MS,. Synthesis Report Series DS-78-22. pp. 189
defaunation: Larval or adult recruitment? Marine Ecology Progress Series 2: 235-41.
Snelgrove, P. V. R. and C. A. Butman (1994). Animal-sediment relationships revisited: cause versus effect. Oceanography and Marine Biology-Annual Review 32: 1 1 1-1 7.
Theede, H., Ponat, A., Hiroki, K. and C, Schlieper (1969). Studies on the resistence of marine bottom invertebrates to oxygen-deficiency and hydrogen sulphide. Marine Biology 2: 325-37.
Thorson, G., 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf,). Memoirs of the Geologicul Society ofAmerica 67: 461-534.
Toumazis, A. D. (1995). Environmental impact associated with the dumping of dredged material at sea - a study for the Limasso Port extension works. Water Science and Technology 32: 15 1-58.
Tsutsumi, H., Fukunaga, S., Fujita, N. and M. Sumida (1990). Relationship between growth of Capitalla sp. and organic enrichment of the sediment,. Marine Ecology Progress Series 63: 157- 62.
Tyson, R. V. and T. H. Pearson (1991). Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia: an overview. In: Tyson, R. V. and T. H. Pearson (eds.). Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia. Geological Society Special Publication No. 58, pp. 1-24.
Warwick, R. M. and K. R. Clarke (1993). Comparing the severity of disturbance; a meta-analysis of marine macrobenthic community data. Marine Ecology Progress Series 92: 22 1-3 1.
Weston, D. P. (1990). Quantitative examination of macrobenthic community changes along an organic enrichment gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series 61: 233-44.
Yamamoto, N. and G. Lopez (1985). Bacterial abundance in relation to surface area and organic content of marine sediments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 90: 209-20.
Yingst, J.Y. and D. C. Rhoads (1980). The role of bioturbation in the enhancement of bacterial growth rates in marine sediments. In: Tenore, K. R. and B. C. Coull (eds.). Marine benthic dynamics. University of South Carolina Press, USA. ,
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 26-07-2013:19:33:16