Appendix A: Conceptual Design Drawings, Alignment Alternativesdefault.sfplanning.org/Citywide/railyard_blvd/RAB_TechReport_FINAL... · cut & cover ----- --station --throat - structure

Final Technical Report RAILYARD ALIGNMENT AND BENEFITS STUDY

Appendix A: Conceptual Design Drawings,

Alignment Alternatives

�--\ \ \

\ \

\ \

\ \

\ \

\ \

\ \

\ \

\ \

\ \

v: TRANSBAY TRANSIJ CENTER

\ \

\ \

\ \

\

\ \

$DATE

\ \

\ \

\ \

\ "

\ .... \ .. \

,

$TIME

.--; 3?-Cl S-'I" dJ 0

APPROVED DT-X ALIGNMENTi

PROPOSED 4TH AND lOWNSEND STREET STATION (SEE EXHIBIT 2.2 FOR DETAILS)

$REQUEST

AT&T PARK:

BRIDGE/3RD STREET

POTENTIAL 3RD STREET STATION (SEE EXHIBIT 3.2 FOR DETAILS)

SITE OF PROPOSED CHASE CENTER WARRIORS ARENA

4TH St AND KING St -

A MISSION BAY

/ • ALIGNMENT (3)

CALTRAIN STATION/RAIL YARD

PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE ALIGNMENT (2)

500' 1000' 2000'

'I.. V)

� (v

POTENTIA LOCATION FOR 22ND STREET STA"'FION

/ EXISTING TUNNEL

',,, SECTION ',

---------------

NOTES

KEY

--- APPROVED DTX ALIGNMENT

--- PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE ALIGNMENT

--- MISSION BAY ALIGNMENT

-------- EXISTING RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED

MJM SDF JS

04-22-16 04-29-16 04-29-16CLIENT

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, PLANNING DEPARTMENT

PROJECT

SF RAIL YARD ALTERNATIVES AND 1-280 BOULEVARD FEASIBILITY STUDY

TITLE

KEY PLAN CORRIDOR ALIGNMENTS

DRAWING NUMBER

EXHIBIT 1.0 STATUS

IN PROCESS, FOR DISCUSSION ONLY SCALE

AS SHOWN AT 11" X 17"

REV

A Page A-1

Appendix A Refined Revised Rail Corridor Alignments

,., ,. \ ,.

... % ,.... \ ,. \ ,, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

,----TRANSBAY TRANSIT CENTRE BOX \ \ \ \ \ \ \

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

\ \. \ \ \ \

\ \ \ \

\ ' \,\ ', .......... \ .... ' , ...... ' ...... -\. -,.._ ... _

--------

_ ... --\ I \ I\ /\ ' ,b \ ,I

\ ;.,,.. ... _

�\\"',........ --------

�

-YI.I'. j,lfCUT & COVER STATION THROAT STRUCTURE

� -----�-----

-�-y�

�

CUl & COVER TUNNEL ----=v

"�- BORED TUNNEL 3 TRACK

3 TRACK

SCALE: 1 "=400' •

APPROVED DTX ALIGNMENT 14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'\\\ ,-------1-i---------

CUT & COVER MINED TUNNEL CUT & COVER TUNNEL

150 STATION THROAT vi

� �<"-------.------------.--------------,--------+----.------t,----=-s-� �=n�n �n �n=n�n�� -----,-------,---------,--�[HJ [L � nnn,�-�--

�--------+--�� 0 ------�

W 00 z 100 - +--------------j- -----i��------+----------+-----�-�l ___ -+---------t----<f-----+----------+--------+-��c--t---------t----------.-+--+------

U 0:: V1 �

I V1

i aJ

� I

i i 'f � r<)

�

I --------------1__ i <i> �

50 -------- • --------- i r<) I -+-----------+---,..--+------,:;;:--------- ------,-----,�---�--+-------+------+----------+-------+---+--+------------+--------;-----+------1-� -- ---- ! .... I :

0-

-- I --- I z ' I N

� .. I -I ... -:------ I- I __ ...- ? I

...... ----.... ---�-- (./} I i � ------ ---- --

--------- ·: -------....... ------.... ::-------------------L----- I w

_.,.-- I / -- .... , ----.... --------- I __ .-- I

',--._ -------- ,n_�------

' .... ,,_ '-----�

IC7"T r--

- .-- - ....

I ---- - - - ,--- LU

w - -- - - I -·------- ?, .... ---------------------;-,- --- ----------------------------- 0 39% . ---- .u.L-?---- --. ---. -. -----. -. ---. -----. -. -----. ---. -. __ !,__

-

• !.,_ __ --

•

-----• -

7 --1--- . ------- . --

- 50 -1 _ _____ �--�---�--/--�-�--�---

----�--�---�

---------------------------_-_--- ----�-�-�-=-=·=·=·=·=- :·:--�-�-�-�-�-;-�-�-�-�~- �-F .- �- �- �--�,-�-�-�-�-�-=·==· =· =·=·i· =· =·= ·=·=·

====

+-:;=t=======

---

---------.-?-- ---

�

-100- ------------- �..........

�

·-_...._ ·-

�---------1, __________ 1 __________ ,1 __________ ,1 __________ 1, __________ 1 __________ ,1 __________ ,1 __________ 1 _________ �1, _____ -0+00

$DATE $TIME

5+00 1 0+00 1 5+00 20+00 25+00 30+00 35+00 4 0+00 4 5+00 50+00

$REQUEST

PROFILE

Horiz: 1 "=400' SCALE: Vert: 1 "=80'

NOTES

1. THE STRATIGRAPHY SHOWN IS BASED ON LIMITEDINFORMATION AVAILABLE AT TIME OF STUDY AND MAY CHANGE WITH ACTUAL GROUND INVESTIGATION.

2. VENTILATION AND FIRE LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS STUDY.

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

GEOLOGICAL KEY:

----?---- ASSUMED BOUNDARY

ARTIFICIAL FILL

YOUNGER BAY MUD

- UPPER LAYERED SEDIMENTS

- OLD BAY CLAY

- LOWER LAYERED SEDIMENTS

SLOPE DEBRIS/RAVINE FILL

FRANCISCAN COMPLEX BEDROCK


MJM SDF JS

06-03-16 06-03-16 06-09-16CLIENT


PROJECT


TITLE

ALIGNMENT 2: PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE

DRAWING NUMBER

EXHIBIT 2.1 STATUS

IN PROCESS, FOR DISCUSSION ONLY SCALE REV

AS SHOWN AT 11" X 17" A

PLAN AND PROFILE

Page A-2

1 50

CUT AND COVER STATION

100 I I I

I

50 rn n n �

I-

� I l/ ---------------------

0 �

-

I

� ---- ----------------------------------------

-50

-100-

-150 . I

50+00 55+00

$DATE $TIME $REQUEST

/

& COVER_______,,.,. STATION

APPROVED

CUT

+-(/)

I I-

� I

DTX ALIGNMENT

,ND COVER TUNNEL

[o__6] [ ! V ISION SFCTA COMMENT

FUTURE PIPE UP TO

TWIN BORED TUNNELS

CUT & COVER TUNNEL DTX STUB

LETTER 2010 3TREET SEWER \

28" OD

PLAN

SCALE: 1 "=400'

TWIN BORE TUNNELS - -

( - -

A

CENTRAL I BAYSIDE SEWER

rPROPOSE 1 PILE SUPPORTED

IMPROVM�NT PROJECT PROPOSED 4

s

X CENTRAL BAYS

! $ ( 7

I

(/) 40" UTILITY BANK I

SFCTA COM �ENT LETTER 2010z WER -

\-

9' DIA DE SEWEIR \

i s FCTA COMMENT LETTE R 2010 -��ROVME:� pt��_J _____ /

7-,---------

i _J -

--------- -- ------------------- ----------------

----------- .. -·-

----■---·

-----

01)( ALIGN�gl_1_. -.-. -·-. ------

� PROPQ?�.£ .-· -· -·-.-·

----· ----

----------

. . --------------------------------------------

I I

60+00 65+00

-----------------

I

70+00

I

�

2% ---------- ---------------------------- --. --------- ---

.

I I

75+00 80+00

PROFILE

Horiz: 1 "=400'SCALE: Vert: 1"=80'

� ��

. .·-· 2%

. . -----. - ------ ■

·-·.

----··-·. .·-· .

. ----·. . --

--- ·-·

I I I I

85+00 90+00 95+00 100+00

' I"')

I-

w

w -f-�--

(/)

w

(/)

I

w

z

-��--- ■ -

u

NOTES



3. ASSUMES RELOCATION OF EXISTING RAIL YARD. REFER TOEXHIBITS 4.1 &4.2 FOR STATION ARRANGEMENT WITH 4 AND 6 PLATFORMS. REFER TO PROJECT REPORT FOR RAILYARD RELOCATION PROPOSALS.

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

GEOLOGICAL KEY:


ARTIFICIAL FILL

YOUNGER BAY MUD


- OLD BAY CLAY





MJM SDF JS

06-03-16 06-03-16 06-09-16CLIENT

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJECT

SF RAIL YARD ALTERNATIVES AND 1-280

BOULEVARD FEASIBILITY STUDY TITLE


PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWING NUMBER

EXHIBIT 2.2

STATUS

IN PROCESS, FOR DISCUSSION ONLY

SCALE REV


Page A-3

200

1 50

100

50

N

1-w

w

0 :::c..l/l

w

w

l/l

-50 w

z

_J

:r: u I<(

-

-100 ::a.

$DATE

V)

<( V) -1--1 0

� V) V)

:I: :r: - Ir-a: I-<( 00 C"I

� M .-'I

-

PENNSYL�ANIA Ave -----

---■ -------

M ISS1

ISSI PP.I St

:reXAS St

MISS©URI St

I\

+-(/)

<( l/l 0 0. -0:: <(

:::i:

�

I /

---

i ---

--

--

'- ___. --

---------

---

-----. -- -----------

I 1 05+00

--- -----

$TIME $REQUEST

------ ---

I 11 0+00

fWIN BORE TUNNELS

If' - "' If'�"'

I) I) /2 - -

/,/

,/ /

/

/ ---/

/ /

7'

.,....

l/l

:r: 1-0)

T @I

I I '·

,/

TWIN BORED TUNNELS

------/' -------/'

/'

. .--· ------. . .

-� ....._,....._

. --· ------ .

2% -------------------- -----------

I 11 5+00

I 120+00

I 125+00

....._ ....._

'--. '-

. . ---

....._ 'S::;

....._

k $ <

-1--1 V)

0

z N N

l-280

BOX

-1--1 V)

0 a: m N

MINNESOTA St

- I

EXISITNG TRACKS IN TUNNE�

-1--1 Vl

IL/)

IN DIANA St

NOTES



3. 22ND STREET STATION LOCATION AND DEPTH AREINDICATIVE ONLY. REQUIRES FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

PENNSYLVANIA Ave

---- --------RROPOSED 22ND STREET STATION

·------ -�-----=-��.J..-J-,------- . .....:.----

-- --------:------t-s-s= =-: =.: ::..:-==:- - -:.= :-= � �:::::

PLAN

SCALE: 1 "=400'

+-l/l

:E

N N

� I

i i ....._

'- -......__ I ....._ ..........._ i ....._

....._ '-.. '

"

CUT & COVE� ST AT ION I

'

ml ,,m I 2�ND STR I/'·

I i _____ _J_

------7

...._ _______ ----

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .---------. . .

•

TWIN

tET STA fl ON

---------

TllJNNEL POR1AL

TIE IN TO EXISl1NG TRACKS

APPROX STN: 175

BORE! TUNNELS

I If'� "' If' -"'

\ )) \ )) " /2 - -

----------�----- �

.......

..

- -

"<: '·,

....._ -------=-="""

2% ----------------I ----------· ----------

------------------------------

-

GEOLOGICAL KEY:


ARTIFICIAL FILL

YOUNGER BAY MUD


- OLD BAY CLAY




DRAWN CHECKED

MJM SDF

06-03-16 06-03-16

CLIENT

APPROVED

JS

06-09-16


PLANNING DEPARTMENT ------

I I 130+00 135+00

Horiz: 1 "=400'SCALE: Vert: 1 "=80'

PROFILE

I 140+00

I 145+00

I 150+00

PROJECT





I EXHIBIT 2.3 155+00

STATUS


SCALE REV


Page A-4

GUT & COVER

STATION THROAT th D

�

3 0 :c.

CUT & COVER STATION THROAT

th

+V)

<t

z

<I'..

¼ :c. I-

----------- z

-

ti,

� 0 ':l 0

th

0 0 If) oO -

ce. -

�-:f;

SCA[E: 1 "=400'

00

I

TRIPLE TRACK TUNNEL

TRIPLE TRACK BORED TUNNEL

+V)

·. -

780.00'

R - 1207.57'

AT&T STADIUM

R - 870.00 1

---K""""--

3RD B R-lSTRE!ET

�G E

\\ w "'5w _J

EtYx-etn�� Nrr-A:°L1-c;·N1��"'tr�-----.-----;::-----,--- �� -�� ;.

i) CHINA BASIN I

3RD ST BRIDGE _IFOUNDATIONS

i J----

-- I ._.,..- I

..- ..- I ? ___ __. I

---------- I

--------------- I

-----------I I

0 -:------------1

? ----. ---------------- ..,,_-

-- ,_ ------- -----

-------50-+----------1 ----------------------------------

?

-100-:----------1

-150-:----------1

-- -- - - --- - - - - . - - - . - - - - - - -- --- - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -

U) z

�

----�

---i___ PILED FOUNDA" IONS (ASSUMED) "-�":...:....::,__- - - -

- -1.. -

N

1-ww

- - - - - -

, .... -.......... --- ---'·<�::---------�::.:---------

- - - - - - - - - /,..-

'r,1"'<1:"i::,,.,/rrT' • ...., ................ -... ....._

- -- -

... , -- ........ ...... --'"') .._ -'- -,.. ... ... '-------.ii --....... ------ • - - - - - - - "',-

-'-

1-vi-r---,/

',,

---::--. ------------- --------

---

\

�

2,5% - - - - - - ----.---.:_· .:.:.·

-.:..::-

-I

',,, SEE NOTE 3 ',,

.. ,, ',,

- - - - - - -

---====:::::::::::==:::�L.._��-r-1:t---::::-_-n.-"u- -

CONFLICT WITH PILESSEE NOTE LI

, _____ w_l w V)

wz_J

I u

tl- 1--, <t

-�--

------- --- -

-200�-------1--------+------------,f---------+-----------1--------+----------+--------+----------+-------+------

0+00 5+00 10+00 15+00


20+00

PROFILE


25+00 30+00 35+00 40+00 45+00

NOTES


2. VENTILATION AND FIRE LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS HAVENOT BEEN CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS STUDY.

3. POTENTIAL CONFLICT WITH PILES TO AT&T ENTRANCEBUILDING MAY BE AVOIDED BY LOWERING ALIGNMENT ALTHOUGH BUILDING PROTECTION MEASURES WOULD BEREQUIRED.

4. CLASH WITH BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS WILL REQUIRE MAJOR PROTECTION WORKS OR COMPLETE RECONSTRUCTION.

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

GEOLOGICAL KEY:


ARTIFICIAL FILL

YOUNGER BAY MUD


- OLD BAY CLAY





MJM SDF JS

06-03-16 06-03-16 06-09-16

CLIENT





ALIGNMENT 3: MISSION BAY


EXHIBIT 3.1

STATUS


SCALE REV

AS SHOWN AT 1111

X 1711

A

Page A-5

CHINA BASIN

---- - ------- --

3RD St STATION EXACT LOCATION TB0

,..

PLATFORM +CROSSOVER • I.

nnn

TRIPLE TRACK TUNNEL

LiJotu CUT & COVER STATION (SEE NOTE 3)

"'C� co

><(co

z 0 V) V) -

�

"'C

co

>-<(co

z 0 V) Cf) -

SITE OF, RROPOSED WARRIORS ARENA

-----

+-' V)

:c I:::) 0 V)

PLAN

SCALE: 1"=400' +(/)

I I=>0 l/l

�

I i

TWIN BORE TUNNELS

+(/)

I 1-l.O

$< (

+-' V)

0 a..

0:::<(�

(/)

<( l/l0 a..

I"')

'-__ , /.,J

!t'VJ

f:j--- VJ

50�- -\�===��=====:;::=========:;===:::::!!:�===:;:======::::;:::======:::;::::=::::j::::====:;::======i===;:========:;:==��::::;:::==::::;::::::!!!'----

i 3RD STREET BRID

IE

FOUNDATIONS i I

_J' i ----------

i ----------1.--1

- L __________ ---------------------- ----------- ---------- -- -------------------I _____ l.._ ____ ---- �----_:-::J

---------4--....,..-.---_-_-_-_-_-_---- --· -w---0- - ,___,___,

lrm1r��1--i1m1-LL _____ _JL __ :;:::::::=--+----+--+--

/�

=-TUNNE � BE LOW-50- 1-

w

w

I l/l

-100

-150-

-200-

w

z

_J

I u I<( :::;;:

PILE CONFLICT

MITIGATION REQUIRED

----

2,3% - . - ----

----

--

-.. --

--

----

-

---

----

-

--

----

-

----

----

--- I

l/l

w

w

l/l

-- .-·

w

-

_J

I u I-<( :::;;:

- .

-25o -;----------i---------i---------,1---------·1·---------1·---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1-------'

45+00 50+00 55+00 60+00 65+00 70+00 75+00 80+00 85+00 90+00 95+00


PROFILE

Horiz: 1 "=400' SCALE: Vert: 1 "=80'

NOTES


2. VENTILATION AND FIRE LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTSHAVE NOT BEEN CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS STUDY.

3. FOR STATION DETAIL SEE EXHIBIT 5.1 AND FOR ALTERNATIVEBORED TUNNEL STATION SEE EXHIBIT 5.2. ADDITIONAL PLATFORM OPTIONS SHOWN FOR BOTH

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

GEOLOGICAL KEY:


ARTIFICIAL FILL

YOUNGER BAY MUD


- OLD BAY CLAY





MJM SDF JS

06-03-16 06-03-16 06-09-16

CLIENT


PROJECT



ALIGNMENT 3: MISSION BAY PLAN AND PROFILE

DRAWING NUMBER

EXHIBIT 3.2

STATUS


SCALE REV


Page A-6

N

1-1.J.l

LJ.l:I:

LJ.l

. ---

•

EXISITNG TUNNEL --•:::.:----::.:::.---

--- --.--:::.:---· ---::------:::::.-----·::-----

-;.:::: . - . -- --. - . -:::.·.:::. . - . -.:::. . - .

.-· -----::.:::.----

----::::.:-------::.·.::.-------·::-----·

EXISITNG PORTAL

�\ �.. CUT & COVER TUNNEL

PROPOSED 22ND STREET STATION

, 30 TRANSFER SUPPORT STRUGfURES

PLAN

SCALE: 1"=400'

200-,---------------------------•----•-------------- 1--------------�-1----------

-WIN BORE TUNNELS CUT & COV,R '

+- Oz

RETAINED CUTTI�G EXISTING T�NNEL EXISTING SURFACE TRACKS

,f' =-'<\ ,f' = '<\ LI)� � ti 150-+-----------l----------l-ii'-l- -l-�n==⇒�i__:w,�---1�---------l--l--�---l---:oF�----------;--------i-- -,�--------;-----------i-1 -----------;------

"'�-Jr--�-�A � (.{)i f

� N ::::l tn Cll >

CI) ct <(

81 � I

1 ,-- ---- ------1 l � 100 -----------j---------i----------t---------;--,---- --i!

-;-- --t---;----- --c------t------t---,t -11---------;---------;--i----------t------=�-

I 1 1-280 j � i '

--- --------- I ..... ----- ----

�----- --- -- I I N ---� � ------t:..=..:!:=--:,,-

1-I __ --------- -- - - - - -----�

50 ---+---1-,-I------+--------/--,/" -- - - ----------- --- - '""'-= ,,,.,,,.,

'�---------+------ +1-

w / -------�� ,,,. _______________________ ':,. !

I w - ---=- . ...;;;J __ ,...___________________________ I I

I -- -=-- "" v---=-- �

1· I ? ...'.;) -::::::--:.-_:-: ::-- 's. /

- - - -\_ I

- --_c.n --: :::,_-:::�::_':3-�_..�_-_.:._.

--

� -- - --�- - - - - - ..? . ----- ----- ----- -- --- -------• --------- . ----------- • -

---------------"'-----

+i .,.,I- -� --•- .- - ------- • -

:.:�

��

��:..:,_�:.:�-�-"Jr"c..:•�•_:_L __________ _:• _____ - - --•------�. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

0 - -------c.n 3t. - . --- 2 - -·

. . - - .

-w

z

...J - - - -- - --- . - -. - - -· - -- --- - -- - . -. - - . - -- --

-- - ----- I

- - . -50-- -

-1 00 �---"'------i---------i---------,1---------i---------i,---------i---------1---------i---------i---------i----�

$DATE $TIME

1 00+00 1 05+00 11 0+00 11 5+00 1 20+00 1 25+00 1 30+00 1 35+00 1 40+00 145+00

$REQUEST

PROFILE


I-• NOTES



3. 22ND STREEET STATION LOCATION AND DEPTH AREINDICATIVE ONLY. REQUIRES FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

GEOLOGICAL KEY:


ARTIFICIAL FILL

YOUNGER BAY MUD


- OLD BAY CLAY





MJM SDF JS

06-03-16 06-03-16 06-09-16

CLIENT


PROJECT


TITLE

ALIGNMENT 3: MISSION BAY PLAN AND PROFILE

DRAWING NUMBER

EXHIBIT 3.3 STATUS

IN PROCESS, FOR DISCUSSION ONLY SCALE REV

AS SHOWN AT 11" X 17" A Page A-7

... .....

.... .... .... .... ....

�------------GUT & COVER

STATION THROAT

CUT & COVER STATION THROAT

+(/)

<t

z

SCA[E: 1 "=400'

TRIPLE TRACK TUNNEL

ti, z

z

� a:. ct)

TRIPLE TRACK BORED TUNNEL

+(/)

ti, 0z

z

AT&T STADIUM

3RD STRE!ET K""""-- ---5 W I NG B R-l�G E

f------_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-�;�-------------------------Eoo)-----------

��-;-----------s..,:i,1;l----------------------------__J \\

1 00 � � /' �a\-----;+�-------------- -+-�----------�----------1- -n-n-n- -n-mn~1-,-d---------------------�-.---------/1/-1-;---,--,-=-;----,---=------��'r

�� l CH I NA BASIN I

II �

! ri I I I "i � J 3RD ST BRIDGE _I

Ji FOUNDATIONS

50-;---------;---------i---�-;•----�--=

� -- I

----�---i___ PILED FOUNDA" IONS (ASSUMED) .__--

I

---- I ? ___ __. I

---------- I

--------------- I

-----------I I

"-�":...:....::,__- - - -- -1.. -, .... -.......... --- ---

'·<�::---------�::.:---------- - - - - - - - - /

,..-'r,1"<1:'i::,..,/rr.,.. • ...., ................ -... ....._

N

1-w w

0 -:----------I -------- ... , -- ........ ...... --'"') .._ -'- -,.. ... ... '-------.ii --....... ------ • - - - - - - - ',-

-'-

1-vi-r---,/

',, ---::--. ------------- --------

---

\

�

-? ---- I

, _____ w_l w V)

. ----------------- ..,,_-

-- ,_ ------- ----- -- -- - -... , - ----- -----50---+----------1 --------------------------------?

-

--------- ------ - ----- --- ---- -·. ----.. _ --- - . -

-100-:----------1 -

-150-:----------1

------ --- -- 3.o✓•----- - --

',,, SEE NOTE 3',, ,,

.. w z _J '

,, ---=--�_::��'- �JJJ_,._�==----a-"U- I

u

tl- 1-- --. -·-. ---. - -

-

----. --. - -. - -

CONFLICT WITH PILES SEE NOTE LI

~ 1 <t

-�--

·-·-·-· ··- -

-.. --------- -

-200�--------�---------i---------,

i---------i---------1,---------

i---------

i---------

i---------

i---------

i----�

0+00


5+00 10+00 15+00 20+00 25+00 30+00 35+00 40+00 45+00

PROFILE


NOTES



3. POTENTIAL CLASH WITH PILES TO AT&T ENTRANCE BUILDINGMAY BE AVOIDED BY LOWERING ALIGNMENT ALTHOUGH BUILDING PROTECTION MEASURES WOULD BE REQUIRED.

4. CLASH WITH BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS WILL REQUIRE MAJOR PROTECTION WORKS OR COMPLETE RECONSTRUCTION.

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

GEOLOGICAL KEY:


ARTIFICIAL FILL

YOUNGER BAY MUD


- OLD BAY CLAY





MJM SDF JS

06-03-16 06-03-16 06-09-16CLIENT







EXHIBIT 3.lB

STATUS


SCALE REV

AS SHOWN AT 11" X 17" B

Page A-8

3RD St STATION ENTRANCES

CHINA BASIN

"'C� co ><( co z 0 V) V) -�

"'C> co >-<( co z 0 V) Cf) -

SITE OF, RROPOSED WARRIORS ARENA

-----

+-' V)

:c I:::)

0 V)

PLAN

SCALE: 1"=400' +-V1

I I-::::>0 V1

�

LARGE BORE TUNNEL i

$< (

+-V1

I I-l.O �

�

+-' V)

0 a..

0:::<(�

+Vl

<( V1

0a..

50�=='1====::::;:=======:;::=========:;========:;:======::::;:::======:::;::::=::::j::::====:;::======i===;:========:;:==��::::;:::==::::;::::::!!!'----

i I

i

i ----------1.-1

3RD STREET BRIDI

E FOUNDATIONS

_L __________ ------ --------------- ----------- ---------- _J' i ------------ -------------------I _____ l..._ ____ ---- �----_:-::J

----------4--....,..-.---_-_-_-_-_-_---- --· -w---0- - ,___,___,

�

-50- I-w w I Vl

-100tttt�

Vl 700' PLATFORM

w z� _J -------

-150- I ----

I- PILE CONFLICT <( :::;;: MITIGATION REQUIRED

-200-

-- ,- --- --

-�--

- - - --- -- -- ----

--�----------------------

---------------� ------·

--- --

--- -

------+---------➔-=-- -· - --

----· --------■-

----· --------------

--------------- ---------· ----------------------

--- -- . -

---· ---

--- I

__ ..,. . -- .

- . - -+· -

Vl

w

w

Vl

w

z

_J

I 0 I<( :::;;:

- .

- - .

-25o -;----------i---------i---------,1---------·1·---------1·---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1-------'

45+00 50+00 55+00 60+00 65+00 70+00 75+00 80+00 85+00 90+00 95+00


PROFILE

Horiz: 1 "=400' SCALE: Vert: 1 "=80'

NOTES



3. FOR STATION DETAIL SEE EXHIBIT 5.2 AND FOR ALTERNATIVE BOX STATION SEE EXHIBIT 5.1. ADDITIONAL PLATFORM OPTIONS SHOWN FOR BOTH

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

GEOLOGICAL KEY:


ARTIFICIAL FILL

YOUNGER BAY MUD


- OLD BAY CLAY




DRAWN CHECKED

MJM SDF

06-03-16 06-03-16

CLIENT

APPROVED

JS

06-09-16


PROJECT





EXHIBIT 3.2B

STATUS


SCALE REV


Page A-9

N

1-1.J.l LJ.l :I:

LJ.l

-

...J

�\

150

100

50

0

-50

-100

-150

$DATE

-

-

-

10Q

�

'Pr

00

7

/ --:;..;::-_.#'

- - -:..::::�__.,,.-__;:S'-� ----..::.-------- -- -----: ::::-:::::: :�__:_:-----

-------

--

.:..:---

--

-

-

-------

-- --

-�

------ ---

--

-- - ----·- ------- I-

w w ILI)

w w VI

--

3.0% -- -- - -·w -·z

-- - . -.- -- -- -- -- ...J . -------· --· - --

I --- ---u ----- -· -1-

- :::?:

�

TWIN BORED TtJN�ELS t

.. CUT & COVER TUNNEL

PROPOSED 22ND STREET STATION

- -7:.......,:

'Pr

�

LARGE BORE TUNNEL

--

-,,__ ------------------ -------------..

---. - ---. - -. -

-· -- ----. -· . ---- -· -·· ------ ---- -- - . -. -· - . -- -· -- -I ---------- . ---· -· -----------· --· -· --

I 100+00

I 105+00

I 11 0+00

I 11 5+00

$TIME $REQUEST

+-LI)

0zNN

�

! ! I i

PLAN

SCALE: 1"=400'

I '- I -

I ' I ' I I ' -�I��

I � J.. r

cu & COVER 1-. '

LJ.l 0::I-,,. v,-o-'01-C<C NI-Nl/1

I

I I

-· ,:i:;::. ·.,;:..

\ , 30

•

EXISITNG TUNNEL

--•:::.:----::.:::.------ --.--:::.:---· ---::---

---:::::.---.--::--__ :;..- __ . ___ ,,.-\

TRANSFER SUPPORT STRUGfURES

'F LI)

0 CX) 0N 0:: EXISTING TlUNNEL . "" I - N

LOWERED I I\ VERT(:::71 (:::71

I i i

--------::.:::.----

----::::.:-------::.·.::.--------::-----·

EXISITNG PORTAL

EXISTING SURFACE

I i I -------·-----------..--- .......

✓ '-l I ------�-

TRACKS

i (-------------------------------------- --..,_,,, r-.-, L.....I

'--

- --- -. -.

--- -. - -.

"" - ------- ·----- ------

-- �

- ----- - . - .

I 120+00

- -. --· - -

PROFILE

-- - --- - -----

I 125+00


. -

---- V -------

- . -- ----· -- . -

I

130+00

------------ --------------------------

-· --. --- -· -..... ----

I 135+00

__ ..... ---- -· ---- ...

I 140+00

-. . . . .

I 145+00

.

+-LI)

N LJ.l >

<( ;:r: u 0::�LI)

w u

I i ! I I

.J..., i_ . i I

f,--

f,--

f,--

NOTES

/-; 1. THE STRATIGRAPHY SHOWN IS BASED ON LIMITEDINFORMATION AVAILABLE AT TIME OF STUDY ANDMAY CHANGE WITH ACTUAL GROUND INVESTIGATION.


3. 22ND STREEET STATION LOCATION AND DEPTH AREINDICATIVE ONLY. REQUIRES FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

DRAFT CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

GEOLOGICAL KEY:


ARTIFICIAL FILL

YOUNGER BAY MUD


- OLD BAY CLAY





MJM SDF JS

09-08-16 09-16-16 09-16-16

CLIENT





ALIGNMENT 3: MISSION

BAY PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWING NUMBER

EXHIBIT 3.3B

STATUS


SCALE REV


Page A-10

jspeaks1

Stamp


' 0 I.{)

>_J I.J.I 1-<l: :::!,

X 0 0:: (L (L <l:

R/W

' 1 2' I

---

I

"<T

-

0 I '

N

� = � I'

"<T

-

t.O 1 0'I I '

N

45'

,.,..-. . . . '"

'. ''

'. . ... '' ' .. • .. ·. t '

< ... ' t.

t. . . < . . t.•·

t ... < . ''

Ir 4 '-�"< "t- ·. t _.

7'-3"!5'-7" 3' I 1

• ·. I. .'t- ·. t. ' I

. ' <· ... ·. t _. I . .

. I < ' . I. < . . '

__,__

;: ·r-'

. <

I. < . ' ,.. ·. T.

' I ' ,, � '

i TOWNSEND ST (RECONSTRUCTED) I I

90'

4 5'

' I

I ' I ' I i

I

1 2'

MEZZANINE

I I I

R/W

' I

I 5'7"! I 7' 7' 14'-6" 5' 7" : 1 i - ' I I I ' ' ' I I I ' ' ' I I I

PL TF RM I I - I I

--'- ' _.._ --'- : --'-I ' ' ' I I I ' ' ' I I I ' ' ' ' ' '

SECTION

POTENTIAL

I

I 7' 1 i I

I ' I ' I

PL TF I

I' I ' I ' '

55'

OVER-SITE DEVELOPMENT

I

1 7' 5'7'! 7'-3" I

" I ' I'I'

RM I

I _,_ : __,__

' I ' I

Li\ ' '

,..,.-, • , ...

. .,, .. .

·,. _.. . "': -,• '

-:·: ·,·,. _.,•·

·,.. ' '. . .. .I>··'·, ... .' . .

, . .- '

. .

.I>··,_.

•• . .,.._. '.•·

•· . .

r�< .. '.I>·.

11". •, •·· 1,:. 9 _. .

•. .'.. .

• . . ' . •

• •

I� I�

• . ·�

3' SLURRY 4'-6" PCC

WALL WALL

CUT AND COVER TUNNEL

DfX ALIGNMEN=r

0 01--'--Pc N

;a: 01---

6 0 _J

z 0

V) LL

0 V) I-'

� _J

CUT AND cevER TUNN�L

DliX SJiUB

•

• •

7TH St

i

! •

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

4TH St

TWIN BORED TUNNEL£

PLAN

0 200' 400'

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I-,�

I

I

I

I

I I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

\ \

\

\

\ \ '

5TH St

' ' ',,,, "� ��

CONSTRUCTION ASSUMPTIONS:

1. STATIONS BUILT USING ASSUMED CUT AND COVER METHODWITH SLURRY WALL (APPROX, 3' THICK) AND A STRUCTURALCONCRETE WALL (APPROX. 4'-6" THICK),

2, DEPTH OF SLURRY WALLS AND OTHER GROUND TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS TO BE DETERMINED.

3, ASSUMED MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OF 10' WIDTH SHOWN BEYOND LIMIT OF SLURRY WALL,

4, TRACK AND PLATFORM DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON CURRENT DTX PROPOSAL

5. A MEZZANINE LEVEL IS PROVIDED AS AN ACCESS POINT TOPLATFORMS AND STREET LEVEL.

6. STREET LEVEL ENTRANCE STRUCTURES ARE NOT SHOWN.LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED.

7, STATION OPERATION AND PLANT ROOMS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SAME LEVEL AS MEZZANINE.

8. STATION STRUCTURE OUTSIDE RIGHTS OF WAY CAN BEDESIGNED FOR OVERSITE DEVELOPMENT,

OPERATION ASSUMPTIONS:

' 1 • FOUR TRACKS AND FOUR PLATFORM EDGES. FOUR STOPPING TRACKS AT SINGLE LENGTH PLATFORMS, ONE TRACK TERMINATES AT CURRENT RAILYARD LOCATION, ALL OTHER TRACKS PASS THROUGH FROM THE SOUTH,

2.

. L

3.

�� -

·----

DRAFT

DRAWN

MJM

06-03-16

C LI ENT

CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

CHECKED

SDF

06-03-16

APPROVED

JS

06-09-16





----


STATION CONFIGURATION OPTION C .._t _....._. .... _,.;;._,.::.,;,. ___ t--D _RA_W_IN _G_N_U_M_B_ER ______________ --1

EXHIBIT 4.1

STATUS

800' IN PROCESS, FOR DISCUSSION ONLY

SC A LE REV


Page A-11

-

0 I[)

>_J Lu 1-<t ::::,; X 0 0::: CL CL <t

$DATE

---

I -

'ST

-

0 I -

N

� = �

I -

'ST

-

I.O I -

I") N

R/W

' 1 2' I

I 1 O'

$TIME

rr-. ., .. . . '• '.

. •. ' . '. •·

.t>· '

' . . ... -. ' ,. _. '

•· ."'· ''. _. . . .

·,,:. '. I.

. .

•· .

' V • ." • •··

.\>·· I_'

3' . ,, . : ·. . .t>.

I.

. ·, •· .. ,

. . .

. ' •. • .

. ' . . '

.,_. "i· . .

11· .· -� .

,,:. '_. .,

45'

Ir 4 '-�"

I 7'-3"! I

I'I'I I I .. ' -'-

' I'I''

'I

$REQUEST

5'7"

� TOWNSEND ST (RECONSTRUCTED)I I

90' R/W

45'

1 2' ' I I I ' 'I I ' ' ' I I

i ' I

I ,

MEZZANINE

5'7"

.\

r 5'7" I I I I I I

1 7' 1 7' 14'-6": : :

--,

I I I ' ' ' I I I ' ' ' I I I

.

PL T1F RM I I I I

I -'- ' -'- -'- : -'-

' ' ' I I I ' ' ' I I I ' ' ' ' ' '

11 4'

POTENTIAL OVER-SITE DEVELOPMENT

5'7"_ \

r 5'7" I I I I I I I I

1 7' 1 7' 14'-6" 1 7' ; : : : ' I I I

I I I I' ' ' 'I I I I' ' ' 'I I I I

.

PL T1F RM I I PL T1F I I I I

I __,_ : -'-- ____.,I,. : ____.,t,, I ' ' ' ' I I I I' ' ' 'I I I I' ' ' '' ' ' '

SECTION

1 7'

5'7"

.\

11RM -'-

4 '-6" PCC WALL, 3 SLURRY WALL

I I 7'-3" : I

I'I'I I I : -'-

-.. ' • l' ..

. .

. '

, . .- . . .

t>·· '

' •··

·1:,·. '

' •·

.I>··'. '. . .

.t>·· ': ,. _. . . .

"t>

. I.·

' _. . •· -,,:. ,_.

,_. _. -, •· ... •· . ' . . ... ... _. .· ' .

. ' '. t>·_ : . .

. .

�--_-;•.

I>--· ... • ,

I/ i.

�L(•' .·

. -:

•· .. ,

. 'L....

CUT AND COVER TUNNEL

DfX ALIGNMEN=r

V')

I-

� _J

0 01--'--PcN

•

CUT AND cevER TUNN�L

DliX SJiUB

• •

7TH St

i

! •

' I I I ' I I I ' I I I ' I I I ' I

I I ' I

I

Ii!I

11 ''

I I I i i :

I· j j : I

1 i rf r!J.,,. I I I!' I '// I/.

I' I ti'

I

i I, ' • I I I I •,• I

I I .' I t I

I I

I '

:I I • I II ' I I

I I II II II I

TWIN BORED TUNNEL£

PLAN

I I I I I I ' I I I I '

I I '

I III II I I I I I I I

I-,� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ '

5TH St

' ' ',,,, "� ��


1. STATIONS BUILT USING ASSUMED CUT AND COVER METHODWITH SLURRY WALL (APPROX. 3' THICK) AND A STRUCTURALCONCRETE WALL (APPROX. 4'-6" THICK).

2. DEPTH OF SLURRY WALLS AND OTHER GROUND TREATMENTREQUIREMENTS TO BE DETERMINED.

3. ASSUMED MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OF 10' WIDTHSHOWN BEYOND LIMIT OF SLURRY WALL.

4. TRACK AND PLATFORM DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON CURRENTDTX PROPOSAL

5. A MEZZANINE LEVEL IS PROVIDED AS AN ACCESS POINT TOPLATFORMS AND STREET LEVEL.


7. STATION OPERATION AND PLANT ROOMS ARE ASSUMED TO BESAME LEVEL AS MEZZANINE.

8. STATION STRUCTURE OUTSIDE RIGHTS OF WAY CAN BEDESIGNED FOR OVERSITE DEVELOPMENT.


' , . SIX TRACKS AND SIX PLATFORM EDGES.SIX STOPPING TRACKS AT SINGLE LENGTH PLATFORMS.2.

, L3. THREE TRACKS TERMINATE AT CURRENT RAILYARD LOCATION,

ALL OTHER TRACKS PASS THROUGH FROM THE SOUTH TO NORTH

�� -

·---

DRAFT

DRAWN

MJM

06-03-16

C LI ENT

CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

CHECKED

SDF

06-03-16

APPROVED

JS

06-09-16





----


STATION CONFIGURATION OPTION D .._t ...,,....,. .... _,.;:...,.::,;,. ___ t--D _RA_W_IN _G_N_U_M_B_ER ______________ --1

EXHIBIT 4.2

STATUS


SC A LE REV

AS SHOWN AT 111

1 X 1711

A

Page A-12

$DATE $TIME

-

0 0

>...JI��X

0a::a..a..�

$REQUEST

R/W

I 1 2' I

I 9' ' I 'I'I 'I

•

�...•·":_ 9

.. •·•·

'· . . ' .. ... • '. •·•·' ..

. •· ' ·,:;. '. . • '. . .•

.. ' ... • ' . .. ' •·• '. . .• ' •·•·' . •· .. ' ' . . ' ,. . • '' . .• ',. . .•· ''.

-:·>. ' . . •· '' .:·:·._.' ' . . ' •· .

-:·: ,_. . ' . ·,

Ir -:·: •: 3' .• I.

. ; :·:·,.

.. • • •·•·

' . •

<>: ' .. .

• . . I>··': •. • •. . '.

. .--

55'

4 '-6"

[! 1 8' ' I

I

I

PLATFORM I'

I II

. '

'

I

I

1 1 0'

'---

i 3RD ST (RECONSTRUCTED) I

55'

� EXISITNG LRT

'- _,

I'

I

I

POTENT IA� RETAIL '

I'

I

I'

I'

I

I''

POTENTIAL RETAIL

MEZZANINE

5' 7" 5'7"

4 '-6" �1 4 '-6" 1 1 8' ' I

I

I

I PLATFORM '

I ..L ..L ..L ..L ' J..

'

I

I '

SECTION

"

t-..

•

,_,..•·. ..• • •

.

. ' . •

•·· • '. .

•. . '. .•

;-: ·, . . ..

' ..•·••·· ' ••

: ·, .. . . •·

• •· '... •.. . I .. . •·' ... .

' . • '. • . •· ' • •, . •. •

.. ' .. .• . ,. . • ' .

. .• ' • •· ' .

<>: ·, • '

. . "?; ·, • ' . •·• '' • •· '

K •·

.t>·· '-''

..

. .·,,:. 1

' . •· • ''•· .I>··': ... .

R/W

1 2' I I

'

9' ' ' I 'I'I 'I

� 3' s � 4'-

LURRY WALL

6" PCC WALL

00..---+----/,-;'

'00<;;]'

' I '

I

PU\TFORM

I

MISSION BAY Blvd NORTH

MISSION BAY Blvd SOUTH

1 � TWIN BORED TUNNELS

w

:::0

0

Vl .....

PLAN

SOUTH St


1, STATIONS BUILT USING ASSUMED CUT AND COVER METHOD WITH SLURRY WALL (APPROX. 3' THICK) AND A STRUCTURAL CONCRETE WALL (APPROX. 4'-6" THICK),

2, DEPTH OF SLURRY WALLS AND OTHER GROUND TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS TO BE DETERMINED.

3, ASSUMED MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OF 9'WIDTH SHOWN BEYOND LIMIT OF SLURRY WALL.

4. TRACK AND PLATFORM DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON CURRENTDTX PROPOSAL

5. A MEZZANINE LEVEL IS PROVIDED AS AN ACCESS POINT TOPLATFORMS AND STREET LEVEL,


7, STATION OPERATION AND PLANT ROOMS ARE ASSUMED TO BE SAME LEVEL AS MEZZANINE,

8, EXISTING LRT WOULD BE DIVERTED OR SUSPENDED DURING CONSTRUCTION OF ROOF SLAB. TOP DOWN METHOD COULD BE USED TO REINSTATE FOR EXCAVATION OF LOWER LEVELS

9. ADDITIONAL PLATFORMS OPTION SHOWN WOULD GIVE ADDITIONACAPACITY DURING EVENTS AT AT&T PARK AND CHASE CENTER


1, THREE TRACKS AND TWO PLATFORM EDGES. 2, TWO STOPPING TRACKS AT DOUBLE LENGTH PLATFORMS. 3, ONE BYPASS TRACK. 4, ALL THREE TRACKS PASS THROUGH FROM THE SOUTH TO

THE NORTH. 5. CROSSOVER LENGTH IS FOR SWITCHING TO BYPASS TRACK ONLY

DRAFT

0

DRAWN

MJM

06-03-16

CLIENT

CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

200' 400'

CHECKED

SDF 06-03-16

800'

APPROVED

JS

06-09-16






STATION CONFIGURATION OPTION A DRAWING NUMBER

EXHIBIT 5.1

STATUS


SCALE REV

AS SHOWN AT 111

1 X 17 11

A

Page A-13

-Ill 0

. .,.N

R/W

I'

i 1 2'

Cf. 31D ST

I, o·

76 J 1 5' I

v-EXISITNG LRTI I I

- I ,

I I � -

+--+-------------,.--------------1---r :-:,

.:-: 1· I •·· .. .-. ':

;,. .. ,. ... _; . ·,

::r: ..

-�.,_. ·, ... ...

I I I I I

·, .. :,, .. ... -. r

'

91 :-. ,.

i-----i�:.·= i•."·\

I II

•· .. -. •: ;, ..

$DATE

· ..... :,,_ .

� .. -,. ,. • . .

... _. ..: ·,. . :,, .

. ....

·, . <>:·.. ' . .... .

-_\:·.. . ·,. :

•·.-,. :•.• ·,. '

. ;,_. . .• '

. . . .• • ..... . .,-. I

·, _ _ ·.

-:·>·,.:

-.:.'

, .... •· .... •.

..... ' •· .

I /

/

I

\ PLATFORM PLATFORM

1

: I . _._ J"t _._ _._J )�--+\ --� �---'------,,---.,__• _� '

. ' : : ·, -:·: •:

· •..

. .... ·•·

:· .. .

. '

. ;,., . : ·,. :

:,,_. . :·, . · . ..., . :·,.: · •. -, .. ......

. . .._.. .

-,._

+ . :,, .. -.:.

-,. _. . .... . . -,. : · • . .... ' -:-.·,·, ..

' . .

' ::.\ .. ,.,.

------------------------

--:-:·,:

:-:·,. . : -:;,. .. . ' ' .

$TIME

SECTION A-A

$REQUEST

R/W R/W

I'

1 2' i EXISITNG LRT

9' ' ·:

'

I

1 7'

PLATFORM PLATFORM

060'

SECTION B-B

R/W

A�

B�

I I I

Ii I

THIRD TR�CK: DRQPS BEl..:OW PLATFORM LEVEL

•

r Ct.IT & COVERI � ENTRANCE STRUCTURE

_/JA

r�B t

PLATFORMS WITHIN TUNNEL ,6,:"

rCUT&COVER

/ ENTRANCE STRUCTURE0

r.----11:.:_�,,. 9_,__.:...::::,=

' 0 0

c-,,lf/-...;:'--ADDITIONAl PLATFORMS

(SEE Nq_TE 10)

MISSION BAY Blvd NORTH

MISSION BAY Blvd SOUTH

� LARGE DIAMETERBORED TUNNEL

!r w11 :::0:c,

Vl.....

PLAN

SOUTH St


1, LARGE DIAMETER BORED TUNNEL IS CONSTRUCTED USING A SINGLE TBM FOR THE FULL LENGTH,

2, ENTRANCE STRUCTURES ARE CONSTRUCTED IN ADVANCE OF TBM 3, ENTRANCE STRUCTURES BUILT USING CUT AND COVER METHOD

WITH SLURRY WALL (APPROX. 3' THICK) AND A STRUCTURAL CONCRETE WALL (APPROX. 4'-6" THICK),

4. DEPTH OF SLURRY WALLS AND OTHER GROUND TREATMENTREQUIREMENTS TO BE DETERMINED.

5. ASSUMED MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OF 9'WIDTHSHOWN BEYOND LIMIT OF SLURRY WALL.

6. TRACK AND PLATFORM DIMENSIONS ARE BASED ON CURRENTDTX PROPOSALS.


8, STATION OPERATION AND PLANT ROOMS ARE ASSUMED TO BE WITHIN ENTRANCE STRUCTURES.

9, EXISTING LRT WOULD BE TEMPORARILY SUPPORTED DURING CONSTRUCTION OF ENTRANCE STRUCTURE.

10.ADDITIONAL PLATFORMS OPTION SHOWN WOULD PROVIDEADDITIONAL CAPACITY DURING EVENTS AT AT&T PARK ANDCHASE CENTER


1, THREE TRACKS AND TWO PLATFORM EDGES • 2, TWO STOPPING TRACKS AT DOUBLE LENGTH PLATFORMS. 3, ONE BYPASS TRACK AND ONE STOPPING TRACK

BELOW PLATFORM. 4, THREE TRACKS PASS THROUGH FROM THE SOUTH TO

THE NORTH, 5. 3RD AND 4TH TRACKS COULD BE EXTENDED END OF TUNNEL

FOR TRAIN STORAGE.

DRAFT

DRAWN

MJM

06-03-16

CLIENT

CONCEPTUAL

DESIGN ONLY

CHECKED

SDF

06-03-16

APPROVED

JS

06-09-16


PROJECT


TITLE

ALIGNMENT 3: MISSION BAY STATION CONFIGURATION OPTION C

DRAWING NUMBER

EXHIBIT 5.2

STATUS


SCALE REV

AS SHOWN AT 1111 X 17" A

Page A-14

OPTION 1 FUTURE WITH SURFACE RAIL: DTX + TRENCHED STREETSDTX AS ENVIRONMENTALLY APPROVED IN TJPA SEIS/EIR

OPTION 2: PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE: DTX + EXTENDED TUNNEL

OPTION 3: MISSION BAY: MODIFIED DTX + 3RD ST TUNNEL

16th & 7th Street - looking east, pedestrian perspective

CONCEPTUAL VISUALIZATIONS OF 16TH & 7TH STREETS

16th & 7th Streets - looking east (from 1010 Potrero) 16th & 7th Streets - looking east (from 1010 Potrero)16th & 7th Streets - looking east (from 1010 Potrero)

Documents

Appendix A: Conceptual Design Drawings, Alignment Alternativesdefault.sfplanning.org/Citywide/railyard_blvd/RAB_TechReport_FINAL... · cut & cover ----- --station --throat - structure