58
I I I I I 7,TH YEAR ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT FOR COMMUNITY DIRECTED TREATMENT WITH IVERMECTIN GDTD PROTECT IN NIGER STATE. I I ORIGINAL: English COUNTRYAIOTF: Nigeria Proiecl l\auqa: NGNIGS Approvalvear: 1999 Launchinq year: 2000 Reportine Period: From: January 2006 To: December 2006 IMoNTH/YEAR) ( MONTH/rEAR) Proiectvearofthisreport: (circleone) I 2 3 4 5 6 (7) I 9 10 Date submitted: 28th January 2007 NGDO partner: UNICEF A}INUAL PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO TECHNICAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (TCC) DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: To APOC Management by 31 Januarv for March TCC meeting To APOC Management by 31 JuIv for September TCC meeting AFRICAN PROGRAMME FOR ONCHOCERCTASTS CONTROL ( i I "^. I r-' . ]-rctJs 1 -'- -"- - J l 21 rEv 2ri0; 16r c* AilE 6fo to e\uL) I , Ji( to Af/ttth

ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

I

I

I

I

I

7,TH YEAR ANNUAL TECHNICAL REPORT FOR COMMUNITYDIRECTED TREATMENT WITH IVERMECTIN GDTD

PROTECT IN NIGER STATE.I

I

ORIGINAL: English

COUNTRYAIOTF: Nigeria Proiecl l\auqa: NGNIGS

Approvalvear: 1999 Launchinq year: 2000

Reportine Period: From: January 2006 To: December 2006

IMoNTH/YEAR) ( MONTH/rEAR)

Proiectvearofthisreport: (circleone) I 2 3 4 5 6 (7) I 9 10

Date submitted: 28th January 2007 NGDO partner: UNICEF

A}INUAL PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORTSUBMITTED TO

TECHNICAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (TCC)

DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION:

To APOC Management by 31 Januarv for March TCC meeting

To APOC Management by 31 JuIv for September TCC meeting

AFRICAN PROGRAMME FORONCHOCERCTASTS CONTROL (

iI "^.I r-' .

]-rctJs1 -'- -"- -J

l

21 rEv 2ri0;16rc*AilE6foto

e\uL)

I

, Ji(toAf/ttth

Page 2: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

I

ANNUAL PROJECT TECHMCAL REPORTTO

TECHMCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (TCC)

ENDORSEMENT

Please confirm you have read this report by signing in theappropriate space.

OFFICERS to sign the report:

Country: MGERIA

National coordinator Name: Mrs. P. Ogbu Pearce

Signature4T)

...ff**-v...Q.<---..

Zonal Oncho coordinator Name: Dr. Fayomi

Signature

ItDate: .5.1. /.t.1. ?rn't I

aeps-

Date

This report has been prepared by Name : Hajiya Rakiya.Y.Datti

Designation : Onchocerciasis coordinator

Date

NGDO representative Name: Dr (Mrs) Catherine Gana

Signature€

>Z-lszl ca" "'1"'r'1"

sigrrutur"#t12:f

Dare .* b.l. eLl I

It

Page 3: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Toble of content

DEFINITIONS, w

FOLLOIY UP ON TCC RECOMMENDATIONS, I

DGCUTIYE SUMMARY 2

SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMA

l.L GzttgnuINFqRMATIqN.

l.l.l Description of the project (briefly)

2.1

2.2.

2.3.

2.4.

2.5.

2.6.

2.6.1.

2.6.2

2.6.3

2.6.4

2.6.5.

2.7.

2.8.

2.9.

2.9.1.

2.9.2.

2.9.3.

2.9.4.

2.9.5.

2.9.6.

3

1.1.2 PtnnNonsarp...

1.2 POPULATION...

SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION OF CDTI ........... .... 12

.....3

..3-6

7-8

9-t I

TIMELNEOFACTIVITIES ....... 12-13

Aovoc.tcv. ......14-15

MoBITIz,InoII, SENSITIZATIoN AND HEALTH EDUCATION OF AT RISKCOMMUNITIES................,. 15

Couuuunv INVoLVEMENr................. ...16-18

C.tp,qcrcy nwtDrNG.......... .. 18-22

Tnnaruotns. .........22

Treatmentfigures............. ......25

ll'hot are the causes of absenteeism?........... ...............26

What ore the reasonsfor refusals? ................ .............26

Briefly describe all krnwn andverified serious adverse events (SAEI that .................26-27

Trend of treatment ochievementfrom CDTI project inception to the cunent year.............28

ORDENNG, SToRAGEAND DELIVERr oF IVERMECTIN ..29-31

CouuuNrcy sELF-MoNrroRrNG tuo SrexanotDERS MEETTNG .... 3l-33

Suponwstox ...-.....33

Provide a/low chart of supervision hierarchy. ........... 33

What were the main issues identified during supervision? .......33-33

llas a supervision checHist used? ......... .....................34

Vlhat were the outcomes at each level of CDTI implementation supervision?.............. 34-35

Was feedback given to the person or groups superuised? .............. -15

How was the feedback used to improve the overall performance of the project? ..........35-36

lll

Page 4: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

SECTION 3: SUPPORT TO CDTI.. ------.------- 37

3.1. Egwrur,ur ......37-38

3.2. FtNtxcut coNTRtBWtoNS oF THE qARTNERS AND coMMtJNtruES.... 39-40

3.3. Orntn FqRMS oF coMMUNrry suppoRT.. ......................40

3.4. Exprttotrunt pERACTTt/rry .40-41

SECTION 4: SUSTAINABILITY OF CDTI 4I

4.1. INrrnN.u; TNDEzENDENT pARTICTpAToRy MoNIToRTNG; EvlLu.artoN 4l

4.1 .l Was Monitoring/evaluation carried out during the reporting period? (tick any of tlrc

follow ing w hic h are appl icable) ..............

4.1.2. Vlrhot were the recommendations?.

4.1.3. How have they heen implemented? -.............

4.2. Susrtnuarutry oF zRoJECTS: zLAN AND sET TARGETS (utuotrony AT yR 3) ....................

4.2.1. Planning at all relevant levels .........

4.2.2. Funds........

4.2.3 Transport (replacement and maintenance)

4. 2.4. Other resources...

4.2.5. To what extent has tlre plan been implemented

Ixrccmrtottt

Iverme ct in de I ive ry me chanisms

Training....

Joint supervision and moniloringwith other program, ..........

Release offunds for proj ect activities ....

Is CDTI inclufud in the PHC budget?

4.3.

4.3.1.

4.3.2.

4.3.3.

4.3.4.

4.3.5.

.....41

.....41

.....42

,...,42

,...,42

42-43

43

43

43

43-44

,....44

,....44

....45

....45

....45

4.3.6. Describe other health programmes thot are using the CDTI structure and how this was

achieved. What hove been tlrc achievements?.............. ..........45

4.3.7. Describe others issues considered in the integration of CDTI. .45-46

4.4. Oprntnotul RNEARCH ..........46

4.4.1. Summorize in not more thsn one holf of a page the operational research undertaken in the

project area within the reporting period. .............46

4.4.2. How were the results applied in the project? ............. ...................46

SECTION 5 : STRENGTHS, VEAKNESSES, CHAL LENG ES, AND OPP0RTUNITIES............ I 7-s0

SECTION 6: UNIQUE FEATARES OF THE PROJECT/OTHER MATTERS

lv

5L5t

Page 5: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Acronyms

APOC African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control

ATO Annual Treatment Obj ective

ATrO Annual Training Obj ective

CBO Community B ased Organ ization

CBS Community Based Supervisor

CDD Community Directed Distributor

CDTI Community Directed Treatment with Ivermectin

CSM Community Sel f-Monitoring

DHS District Health Supervisor

DPHC Director Primary Health Care

FOMWAN Federation Of Muslim Women Association Of Nigeria

HSAM Health Education, Sensitization, Advocacy, Mobilization

LGA Local Government Area

LOCT Local Onchocerciasis Control Team

MIS Management Information System

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

MOH Ministry of Health

N/A Not Available

NGDO Non-Govemmental Development Organization

NGO Non-Governmental Organization

NIDs National Immunization Days

NPI National Programme on Immunization

NOCP National Onchocerciasis Control Programme

NOTF National Onchocerciasis Task Force

PHC Primary Health Care

REMO Rapid Epidemiological Mapping of Onchocerciasis

SAE Severe Adverse Event

SHM Stakeholders' Meeting

SOCT State Onchoc.erciasis Control Team (The State Programme coordinating team)

TBAs Traditional Birth Attendants.

TCC Technical Consultative Committee (APOC scientific advisory group)

LINICEF United Nations Children's Fund

UTG Ultimate Treatment Goal

wHo Wotld Health Organization

v

Page 6: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

DeJinitions

(i) Total population: the total population living in meso/hyper-endemic communities within theproject area (based on REMO and census taking).

(ii) Eliqible populotion: calculated as 84%o of the total population in mesolhyper-endemiccommunities in the project area.

(ii i) Annual Treatment Obiective; (ATO): the estimated number of persons living in meso/hyper-endemic areas that a CDTI project intends to treat with ivermectin in a given year.

(iv) Utimate Treatment Goal (UTGI: calculated as the maximum number of people to be treatedannually in meso/hyper endemic areas within the project area, ultimately to be reached whenthe project has reached full geographic coverage (normally the project should be expected toreach the UTG at the end of the 3d year of the project).

(vi)

(v)

(vii)

(viii)

(ix)

Theraoeutic coverage: number of people treated in a given year over the total population (thisshould be expressed as a percentage).

Geographical coverage: number of communities treated in a given year over the total numberof meso/hyper-endemic communities as identified by REMO in the project area (this shouldbe expressed as a percentage).

Integration: delivering additional health interventions (i.e. vitamin A supplements,albendazole for LF, screening for cataract etc.) through CDTI (using the same systems,training, supervision and personnel) in order to maximise cost-effectiveness and empowercommunities to solve more of their health problems. This does not include activities orinterventions carried out by community distributors outside of CDTI.

Sustainabililv: CDTI activities in an area are sustainable when they continue to functioneffectively for the foreseeable future, with high treatment coverage, integrated into theavailable healthcare service, with strong community ownership, using resources mobilised bythe community and the govemment.

Community seV-monitoring (CSM\.' The process by which the community is empowered tooversee and monitor the performance of CDTI (or any community-based health interventionprogramme), with a view to ensuring that the programme is being executed in the wayintended. It encourages the community to take full responsibility of ivermectin distributionand make appropriate modifications when necessary.

vl

Page 7: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

FOLLOW UP ON TCC RECOMMENDATIONS

Using the table below, fill in the recommendations of the last TCC on the project and describe howthey have been addressed.

TCC session I

Numberof

Recommendations in theReport

TCCRECOMMEN

DATIONS

ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE PROJECT FORTCC/APOCMGT USE

ONLY

(i) Focus on State andLGA financialcontributions.

Concerted effort was made both to the Ministry forLocal Government to obtain the proposed mandate forcentral deduction ofcounterpart contribution forthe 2lCDTI LGAs as well as to the Ministry of Finance forrelease ofUS$30,000 approved counterpart fund fortheState.

US$20,000 was released to the State but no mandatewas obtained for central deduction of LGAcontributions.

Only 2 LGAs released the sum of US$650 to theirLOCTs despite intense advocacy visits to all of the 2lLGAs

(ii) Replace and repairproject equipment.

Some project equipment were repaired and maintainedat State level, however, repair of LOCT motorcycles has

been difficult due to absence of counterpart funding atthat level.

(iii) Recruit more newfemale and maleCDDs.

Communities are continuously mobilized for inclusionof women as CDDs, but this is still difficult to achievebecause of religious and socio-cultural belief of thepeople especially the Moslems who happer to be themajority. There is a plan to collaborate with an islamicgroup known as FOMWAN, with the hope of improvingwomen participation. Absence of female CDDs does nothowever seem to have any negative effect on treatmentof females.

There is severe CDD attrition due to lack of motivation,and new ones are being selected both at ward level andalong family lines. CDDs are to be trained for integrateddisease surveillance and it is hoped that this wouldcreate opportunities for thern to be motivated alsothereby reducing threat of attrition.

(iv) Improvesupervision at alllevels.

There has been concerted effort by NOCP, UNICEF andthe SOCT to ensure that communities are adequatelysupervised, and these efforts have been quite revealing!The LOCT are highly dernoralized and hardlysupervised the lower level, therefore, drugs were notreleased to the communities on time and even whenreleased, distribution was not properly supervised anddata was not collated from the community register.

WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 8: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Executive Sunnury

Niger State has 25 administrative divisions known as Local Government Areas (LGAs), out ofwhich 2l arc approved by APOC for implementation of CDTI. The population of the State is 3.9

million based on the recent (2006) national census. There are 2,872 affected communities with aregistered population of 1,774,333 people at risk of infection and blindness from Onchocerciasis.

At the time of submission of this report l,l53,3ll people were treated in 2,069 endemic

communities, representing65Yo therapeutic and72o/o geographic coverage respectively. Four LGAs

did not give any feedback while five of them submitted only partial reports. The Ultimate Treatnent

Goal (UTG) forthe project is 1,490,440, therefore UTG coveragewasTTYo.

The population in over 40%o of the project area is highly migratory because the State shares

boundary with several others in all directions, as well as Benin republic on its' western border.

Commonest among the migrant ethnic groups are Gwaris, Kambaris and nomadic Fulanis. Due tothe socio-cultural beliefs and practices of the aforementioned, they migrate annually both within and

outside the State in search of virgin (fertile) land for growing cash crops such as yams, guinea corn,

matze and millef, while the nomadic Fulani migrate in the dry season in search of water and fresh

fodder for their animals. The above phenomenon is responsible for the nucleated and highlydispersed settlement pattem, as well as highly dynamic community and population figure thatprevails in over 60% of the State. Niger is the largest of the 36 States in Nigeria, occupying l}Yo ofthe total area.

5,356 CDDs were trained/retrained out of an ATrO of 14,263 representing 3802, while 702 healthpersonnel were trained/retrained to increase capacity for supervision of CDTI. This achievementrepresents l22o/o cov erage.

The challenge the project experienced within the period of report was achieving its'ATO of1,490,440 people in spite of very poor funding at LGA level. Only two LGAs released funds to the

LOCT, therefore most of the teams were demoralized and commitment declined. Because ofinability of most LGAs to collect lvermectin from the State, it had to be conveyed to them, either by

the SOCT or during distribution of vaccines for mass immunization. In order to ensure that drugs

were released to all eligible communities, a comprehensive list of these communities, and their drug

allocation was compiled by the SOCT and then distributed to the LGAs as a guide. The acceptance

of Mectizan, and its' popularity, together with opportunity provided by the NIDs, helped to integrate

CDTI in PHC at all levels, while the commitment of some of the LOCT and frontline health facilitystaffensured training/retraining of CDDs as well as supervision of treatment. Intensive advocacy and

mobilization visits werc made to LGAs by the SOCT and supervision was intensified to ensure

adequate ooverage.

Frequent transfer of the heads of the PHC department at LGA level was a major set back to ensuringtimely reporting from the LGAs, despite the effort of the SOCT. UMCEFS' renewed commitment tothe programme provides a ray of hope and its' funding for focused intervention in Borgu LGA(November/December 2006) holds promise for improved coverage at the border with Beninrepublic.

) WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 9: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

SECTION I: Backgruund information

LL General information

1.1.1 Description of the project (brielb)

- Geographical location, topography, climate

- Population: activities, cultures, language

- Communication systems (roads...)

- Administrationstructure

- Health system & health care delivery (provide the number of health posts/centers in the

project area if the information is available).

- Number of health staff in project area and number of health staff involved in CDTI activities

l.l.l. Descriotion of oroiect

Niger State is geographically located within the middle belt of Nigeria and it lies between latitude 3

20' East and longitude ll" 3' North. It is borderedby Zamfaru State on the North, Kebbi State on

the North Wesf Kogi State on the South, Kwara State on the South West Kaduna and Federal

Capital Territory of Abuja at the North East and South East respectively. The State shares a common

boundary with the Republic of Benin on the westem border i.e. at Babanna district of Borgu Local

Govemment Area. The location of the State gives rise to common inter-border trade with it in all

directions.

The topography of the State is highly undulating, while the land is traversed by several fast flowing

rivers such as Niger, Oli, Kaduna, Kontagora, Gurara and several tributaries that flow into them. As

a result of the topography, the major rivers of Niger and Kaduna have been dammed for production

of electricity, therefore, the State houses the largest number (3) of hydro electric power stations in

the country thus earning itself the title, 'Power State'. Prominent among the dams are Kainji, across

river Niger at New Bussa in Borgu LGA, and Shiroro, across river Kaduna at Shiroro LGA. Despite

its' meso endemicity, the State is surrounded by hyper endemic foci on its' northeas! southeas!

south and southwest. These foci are in Kadun4 the FCT, Kogi and Kwara States respectively.

The vegetation of the State is mainly of the guinea savanna type with forest mosaic savanna

especially in the south and south-western parts. The climate is of distinct dry and wet season with

rainfall ranging between l,l00mm in the North and l,600mm in the south. The wet sqxon ranges

from l50days or more in the northern part to 210 days or more in the southern part. The dry season

commences in October and humidity could be as low as 140'between December and February.

1 WHOiAPOC. 24 November 2006

Page 10: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Temperatures rise as much as 90T betrveen March and June, with the lowest minimal temperatures

usually in December and January.

Most of the Onchocerciasis endemic communities are located within the abundant flood plains of the

rivers that traverse the lan{ thus the population is agrarian in over 80% of the State. Among the

large ethnic groups, the Gwaris', Kambaris' and nomadic Fulani have a socio-cultural habit of

moving from place to place in search of virgin land for their crops, and in the case of the Fulanis, for

water and fresh fodder for their animals. Common cash crops produced by the farming groups

include yams, rice,maize, millet and guinea corn. Nupes' are one of the major ethnic groups in the

State, and they are more stable in settlement forming very large clustered populations that reside

within the marshy alluvial rich valleys, which abound in the State. The Nupes grow mainly rice as

both food and cash crop while they are also very good fishermen.

While the settlement pattern in 4OYo of the State is dense and clustered, over 60% is sparsely

populated and highly nucleated with distances of up to 40 kilometers between some communities.

Niger is in fact the largest State in Nigeri4 occupying about 12 million hectares of land, which

represents about one tenth of the total land area of the country.

There is a fairly good road network in about 40%o of the areq however, due to the riverine nature,

about 40%o of movement is by water, using local tug boats, engine boats, and ferry for movement ofgoods, vehicles and humans across the rivers, especially between communities and from the State to

neighboring Kebbi State. Heavy flooding, as a result of overflow of the hydroelectric power dams

especially after the rains, is a major threat to communities that reside along the large rivers of the

State, therefore several communities are often either submerged, dispersed or are displaced.

The administrative structure is typical of what obtains all over the country, i.e. with a politically

elected executive Governor at the State level and 25 local administrative councils headed also by

politically elected LGA chairmen. The peculiarity here is that the administrative councils are further

suMivided into 43 units with 18 ofthem known as developmental area councils each with a separate

leadership which makes coordination of activities quite difficult especially where there is poor

collaboration between the adjoining LOCT coordinators. There are several traditional institutions

headed by Emirs and chiefs of various hierarchies, who oversee the districts and communities while

the kingdoms are grouped as emirate councils. The communities within the emirates are headed by

traditional rulers who pay allegiance to the top hierarchy as is typical of the ancient feudal system ofgovernment, while all Emirs are accountable to the Executive Governor. The State government

basically comprises ofthree arms i.e., the executive, legislative and judiciary.

4 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 11: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

The heatth care delivery system comprises of three levels i.e. Primary, Secondary and Tertiary, all of

which are quite well interlinked. The PHC system has been put fairly well in place, and is becoming

more functional. There are over 1,400 health posts/health centers in the State out of which about

1,000 exist within the CDTI project area. There are 3,239 PHC staff, out of which, 796 are

participating in CDTI.

Out of 2l CDTI LGAs, 17 are old (i.e. have implemented CDTI for at least 4 years), while four,

namely, Suleja Tafa, Gurara and Agwara (which came about as a result of the REMO

update/approval of year 2004) have implemented CDTI for three years now. Western Borgu shares

border with Benin Republic at Babanna district and was also approved for CDTI in year 2004. It was

only in year 2006 however ,that concerted effort was made to ensure total coverage of over 200

communities in that sector.

5 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 12: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Table 1: Number of heahh staffinvolved in CDTI

District/LGA

Number of health staffinvolved in CDTI activities.

Total Number ofhealth staffin the

entire project areaBr

Number of health staffinvolved in CDTI

B,

Percentage

BrBzlBr *100

Kontagora 150 l3 9

Rrjau 123 50 4t

Magama 216 36 17

Mariga 202 34 17

Mashegu t14 27 24

Agaie 132 23 t7

Lapai 137 67 49

Mokwa 182 48 26

Rafi 185 6t 33

Wushishi 150 50 33

Borgu l13 69 6l

Lavun 185 23 t2

Shiroro 120 60 50

Gbako 69 2t 30

Katcha 65 45 69

Munya 194 l8 9

Bosso230 36 t6

Suleja 166 2t 13

Gurara 187 37 20

Agwara 164 24 l5

Tafa l5s 33 2t

TOTAL 3,239 796 25

('l WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 13: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

1.1.2 Portnerchip

- Indicate the partners involved in project implementation at all levels MOH, NGDOs

(national/international), communities, local organizations, etc.]

- Describe overall working relationship among par0lers, clearly indicating specific areas of project

activities (planning, supervision, advocacy, planning, mobilization, etc) where all partners are

involved.

- State plans, if any, to mobilize the State/region/district/LcA decision-makers, NGDOs, NGOs,

CBOS, to assist in CDTI implementation.

Partners involved in project implementation are:-

- The National Onchocerciasis Control Programme, of the Federal Ministry of Health,

- The State Ministry of Health and LGA/PHC departments

- UNICEF, APOC, WHO

- 2,872 Onchocerciasis endemic communities with their CBOs. These CBOs are mainly agricultural

cooperative groups and trade unions for both men and women, as well as various youth (age

grade) associations, which also often double as agricultural cooperative groups.

The overall working relationship among the partners is quite cordial and encouraging. Generally, all

are involved in HSAM at various levels. LINICEF has renewed its' commitment and is involved in

planning for conduct of CDTI activities like planning, training, HSAM and supervision/monitoring.

The focused intervention at Borgu LGA (December) was an outcome of the internal

advocacy/monitoring visit paid to the State by the new UNICEF consultant in October in company

of NOTF officials. Two review meetings for the 9 assisted States were also sponsored by UNICEF

in the year under report.

The Ministry of health solicited for piece-meal release of funds from the US$23,809 approved and

was successful in acquiring US$15,873 which was utilized for HSAM, supervision and monitoring

{rmong several other activities.

7 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 14: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Various groups like media organizations, the Nigerian Red Cross society, Jama'atu- Nasril-Islam

(JNI) the predominant muslim organization, as well as National Union of Road Transport Workers

also pledged to continue to assist with HSAM activities.

There would be a new democratic government in 2007, and there is a plan for high level advocacy

visit involving UNICEF, NOCP and possibly APOC to the State in the middle of year 2007 to

advocate for bulk release of funds (for 3 years) from the newly elected democratic govemment.

Advocacy visit would be paid to the 2l new LGA councils by the SOCT to also solicit support for

long term release of funds for LOCT/CDTI activities.

A comprehensive list of active local NGOs and CBOs is being compiled for sensitization and

collaboration in the on-coming year, of special interest is the Federation of Muslim Women

Association Of Nigeria (FOMWAN) which would be engaged for collaboration to mobilize women

for active participation in CDTI at community level.

I WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 15: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

l'{ HHl"IFl1-. !OESS

GaF\\!

SS

S

a'F

=GG

(\\.S(\(:SGSisGs(!rts

.GtsSG

Nst\\S

SF.

OA

sl\

€S

Oa

\(!S*

TDo@oo

tA)

x!9op)

odA'f,o

aFtoo

t-o,

tt!oExet

to(t

vF) o

{F'

t-D)Eo)

0cg.(D

7i-

c)a(]

0ag

p:t0aF)

c)0aF'

te

vL.F)I

xoD)

oaoIF)

t-oOUIE D.av,-

t'='ga ^aEaJ.

Esai'(l

o\@\oLrla

L,I\o

-J

o\A{\o

5ol..J

@

UT(,)(,6tJ)

(JJtJ(,1

(+)

tJ(,rPaoo

UrJo{o@

@55L,I

\oP{55

U)tJ(n\ou)

{-6{(])o\

Ur;J{os

l..J{N)s

\oi'J(,{

(,l

t.J(,l

tJ{

ooF{\o\o

ECTEi3 3€ 3Eg*=u

='ts.iE

(rr5 5o o\o\

o\tJ oUJ

\ol.J

5o(,) u)o tJ6 5(,rtJ tJo(,r o

NJ

t.J{ L,ItJ 5

N){N) :sF

a :.ir;*g;E. zEgoEt

otto

(D(rt

E,aoat,

E

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NEI iItt<IroP-?

d rE-E B.dEE;'

L'T5

5o o\o\o\NJ

UJ

\oNJ

5oUJ

(])o tJ

oo5(,l

tJ NJo(,l otJ

tJ{ (Jrt.J s

tJ{N) -t

o(tD

EBe'gNOo>EE

oI

lt

+

o\6\o(,6

(,r\o

{o\5{\o

5otJa

L'I(}JLar6u)

u)l..Jt,

UJ

N)(,Pooo

UrJo{oa

@5sLrr

\oP-IsF

t,tJ(,\o(JJ

{€-lUJo\

L'I;J{o5

l.J{NJ5

\ot'J(,l-J

(,t.J(,1..){

65{\o\o :sF

Pl!A5 E'EP =b-g6E.

.)

o

te

oor{i

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

E.E g,,x ll O q.r<rsEgEi *; '

o\6\o6

L'I\o

{o\5{\o

sotJ6

(,(,)Ur@UJ

u)NJ(,)(JJ

tJ(JrPooa

(,\o-Jo@

@5s(,r

\oo-J55

UJtJ\o(J)

{@{t,)o\

L'T

;J{o5I..J{tJ5

\otJ(,r-l

t'J

I'J\t

@5{\o\o

lrB*3 -tH e.3!.ETDNIE E'o(!vE'!o.

I

+

Ur;.J\ot'J(i

5)o{o5

(js(,)o\s

(r)(l)

{@(r)

s(Jr

oo

NJ{5(}J

NJ

oooo

Uro(,(,

{o\oo\o

\to\i..rtJ(, (JJ{

6

o\o\(JJ6

565{

oo\6@t)

-l{\6otJOtJ(J)

-INJu) gEFeao

\o

,I

nN)5zo(t5rt\)oo\

I I I I

Page 16: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

rloFl

F

-lF)p)'

UA{Hs)

oA)

F)

v)

g.F]

{-t5t(r)(,

L'T{(JI

o

5a"(,t.JL'I

{UJ\o€

o\5(,)

{

Na{N

{N)

o\(Jt UJ6

\o

I I I I

t.)€-tbJ

{l..J

o\L'I u)

@\o

-t{5(,(,t,

(,l{(,l

o

5€(,tJ(,r

{(JJ

\o6

o\5uf-J

I I I I I

\t{5(,(,(,

(,r{o

5@

N)(,|

{UJ\o6

o\5UJ

{

5\oo55

56UJo6

5o{o\

o\NJ

ss

(,r5otJo\

dt)I'(DL<(D O) F,lE god.&l8 t Ra:=-)/6o

L+S)e'IYa).6 (,(D:tAia

J

8riDv)x.6 Iar=()=5HirA5). IL5 ;Ioag8c;Eif€H=. 'o()6'()+oo68D)dtsa

Pd5(DoO--t o)JJP. IL+=(D

'6)-.vJEfrvr5o,6t(D Io-(T65oo.roEXIJH6'()o)ALadrlFdV)otA='o):'o=.

J

*:i5(DEL. Ft

-l 'OoE'O'+ag)if.t(D"PgEg

oE'+Dite65g

--o!g 8'Eo+)

ZB-u o)9o=- aDrn'o t,+a.D Ft

a*95=Eo€.o(D+)Cl

H'3o.5D'(DSo-

!r oa

3$g)(DC5'dsr5(D^ (rc

'c,g.o3o

l-zo

I

I

I

I

I

I

.*

U)otrtsto(D

2S)

oA:

oo(r)gv)

oU

I'

l-oEU)ota)

-(D(A

(D

9.rP

oF)Ft

:siisSi.t Gisi. ta,

ga

s(!NI:lGS

g\ts

oaG

.*G

EsS()Sra

GUt

sGGS

:i

e

sOo!s

trJSlE.€

+Gte-G?)FF.sG!

(\-

S(\

tA rj

=.5oxs) o-e8$I-:,gH

PDPJO

(Du)o)(Dir- o-oFt5

U)Eoroo:tooU)

t(Dv)3(D

(Dte(r,

oo

0aootrv)

oa-toErdoFnT'ooE(D

38)p-(D

t!o

ocv)(D

oo-0

9)

5oao,oo

oU)oooIot

o,

s #f 3=E

i q

3.E_3 sN'B.E €

E = E Fti+v1lEHO=.E 53 BqE 3 sE'F3 EAbE E.

1.fr'qH rs $qu,*8UT+Hi $sdES3&[ sA;H E;+=.=S_q f € E';EF $B=H rigi si*3*c.grxa;qg rrq IT TE {eH+q

'+f *0'3+3.i s'A'CJI:(:h+^\J.UUt? 6'a *#=* i'fEi $=o-o:5sa e e^=o)Y.;'0+t!:1))-9E H'.--oa

d

=atdq 6I ;i.IO

Se.AHEB(otaJ.+EtaJjx(DE1o(rt +)

o

t'oo"otJ5z,oI6abI

tJoo\

I

Page 17: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

5$A^g 6 0i;f;ss;HS!E=oq$o.B :';E-+

o.tro5-.datstgI9+odil=rq9 g EEfESE3A=s=.)5'.,l(DovrEa 5 q*HdFH'e,SDCi,=PA-trtn=(D-bbE:.TsEB.?qg9poE t' i 6-I +YbH)(Dd=qailEo9';(,ud h9lr-JriSPtl

l FH =rdE'i;+hd

C)!iOvEXHs.;; 8.*fs:Po.3?6oro(DfLL

YA

5'g E g

g 5 a:nduqood{7-A J g!?- 6 P€H8:FtdE = a 0'

-JoE(Do5!5t;.(9HH.35-ttr=6;ratD? ='h"Atl,>q g3

I

sd oaN(D

5+s +tDaro

\J

-otJ5zoo3doI

a.J

o,

Page 18: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

* 'r1 lJ V,T= i NI \fl5\rC+\i+& $ 96(DSifG\.r

;g.R sgutad a fF-f E S^ia.GiE.TPd.Rx(a=.s.sd

.!(D\?.oo'gr\ta)\irtt)F)U)

(DA'oo.

otrIo(DA)5

o-alo)

=l0a

{(D

=oFtD

A)o

ot,{(DFt(D

fo(D

(}

(Do.cr

o

os3

(D

do0qggo-

lFlS.lR'I,*\Iqi

(!

sG.S

SG

Gu,

S'

s(\SRFv)

ilSG

sG(:srrG

\<GS

tJ

t

t-'go-oN)5zoo3ct(}Il.J

oo\

o6A),(o

aao

l-a)

E!oIa

{@

@

7F) o

,f{a)

t-Orrds)

0aF'(D

F)q

o0ag

D)5d6'c)

o:@Ep)

Fs)c

XoA'

0eotO)

tO

tt

Fo

!I

EI p

iJtrE

I t E0qo

t t F t zoo

C(DI

a9!r*+E

zto(tNE

ootlo

E

oat)

ct)tD

'cttD

C()Et

a(Dtodot

I Uoo(D

C(DE

I rr)(DEgjd(D

I ao!(D

dt}5

toeFo

oooCot

aoroq

(Dt

Foaq

a(D!(D

dot

zoI3d(Dt

oQ

t,.D

o

c

o

IF:

trDH

IE

I

E0eFq

- Iqatr@

c F ooo6ot

-(n=p3.+eE' Hil

lc

E!qtr

0etoF

0qo

I U(Do(D

d(!Ft

tr toaa

E F0ego

aofoo3doI

tr@to

goatrlu

o()odori

-o,oEICE=o

o

'E,

=.

t F!l()o:5tr.E

zooC(D

Lic E F0et@

E(trtto

t zoo

6tDFt

-a=DTIriE

oG

O

oCt,aE(!

OoE(D

Cot

zog

do

zoo36t}t

U(D()o36(!t

Uooo36o

zo(!

C(DI

zoo6(Dt

u)orooC(DI

zo(D

tscr()I

Uoo(I5C(DI

zoodot

o()o(toI

zog6(!t

U(Do(D

d(D

-oJo

OE'=(!

o

EF,

trY

lr

oA)3cF)q

zo(lECo-

tr tr E(rqFo

E t0a

=v,

t g zotDjCoI

a9:D

=*+EUil

!QaOrlEE

o

COoftrt!

Ct]t

zot!36(Dt

zooEqot

U(noo6oE

Uoo@

:Jdot

zoqJ

6oE

zoqC(}t

zogCot

z,oo3(ttDt

z,oo:1d(D

zog6oE

zog5(to

zo(!

6o

UoogdoFi

-o,ocEe,9

o

fot

FY

g5o

o5E.t

zo(D

CoI

t F F@EU'

tr tr EocEo

F zo(1

C'tD,.t

(otsJ

oe

oaE(D

?.D

oct)o!gJ6ot

zoo36(Dt

zoo3C(DI

U(Do(D

3qot

U(Dot}tsC'otst

zo(D

3C(]t

zog(rtD5

zoo3d(D

atD

"E,od(!

zo(D

5(t(DE

zo(o

ts6ot

zo(D

3Ctl5

zo(D

36oI

Uo()o3qoI

-oBEot,=6

o

I

Page 19: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

:loFl

F

ae,Or'

0qtEc)

oEED's,

aa.p)

EDo(aoo

z;J

ct

XD)

oc)

t@trq

0etoE

oetro

ooo(rot

tr Epo

aoE(D

dort

gaEo

aoro(D

Co

aoE(a

6oI

zooc,.oI

tr0aco

tE3(D

iJ()-

0ato0ea

F0etrq

I t Ft]

tr0qdv1

zo(D

d(!t

toato

Itr E

(D

-5(D

t0qEa

tr0eFq

F@tr@

oooC(DI

t tTo

zo(D

E6(DI

zo(D

tsdt}t

zotD)qoFt

a(DEo6(Dt

UootDIdoI

zo(D

qoI

ooCtDt

t!J(!

troego

0a@

t0ato

oooC(DFt

utD

zoo6o

UoogJEot

zoq!J6oI

a(D'do3dot

UoogjC(Dt

zoo3(t(Dt

oa)oC(DI

tr(D

c@tq

t0ato

I0eo

ooodot

E tr(!

zog5d(D

U(ao(!B6oB

zo(D

d(!t

ao\,(D

5crot

Uo()(n

CtD

a(D

13otsdot

ooo6(}I

t

ooc(D

(r,

3 ? UBg a'F)x=.ts=tA =r3.t-)Or)ooSJ6 +U6q.i )i+ ra5bBrP8.6 +Ei:rE 6xot,Ex ts-JJCD tD 9T

6 r S*lJoH.)Ea-l;)-(D:,8tsg0 eE B.q- doi'it5(D(DgEis'rtsad6 -lsj. tt,

d 9.9CD*

Jo-o-=.oi'o0a5

J

t-tln+ oP+i!f;.(Dt/)

=' u)tns+x(!

+5'.ia)

Uq+ a-c)+)

O) irlsE.:J A.it5ttroaHO

N'B3. ol9r

tDo)2r)L3.=S.o++gF{*-gYh*dJJtDF)Z,Ets6'

o-Orae f 0'ait4ret? E.F)a,9.

La95[i=EZ:,.d=t; sg F3.aa"od57ts (D

gsFv,

=rEsS.s g F- f H'(DE)

E)

=ts(DHq96o, i.*HaD=o.659,io ?t'

6sgIg6-$E )

(D

o' ,g6'Eg .?'

&qa) tno)-d

o(D

BB:F.?U'd4r)q-o;ara-l

€#(nt5(D!)o if-6_ _g

3s,B6v)d(D

5():lPta5(Dtr'got-;i. !)o()571

=O-FldJ(Dg6rd

=.a q ?oa==E 5'*Jja:

69e.:f=q,tr, 3 a:rtrrg?t'EHBH ia5= Hrs.6-

i.-taon^r6=*'Y5?E'=oo6Est)

E: eo(Dor ='J

dfra(D5O, vlES*. irEo-d?g'6hioLt

{ i'.(Do5(D

a.?a5ou)fL'o) ia5i5'8fO+ao- F,ta#so-tsoa{(nEE"*(DFl' o:oi,5(!eo-

rEC)C)o53g-E:'=tod

o(D(n5EqET:(Da)it ir-tr! (Dau)6EX=ddd)tA)o)dd

t)

{o'o

.ON)5zo(!

stJ

o\

Page 20: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

2.2. Advocacy

State the number of policy/decision makers mobilized at each relevant level during the current year;

the reason(s) for undertaking the advocacy and the outcome. Describe difficulties/constraints being

faced and suggestions on how to improve advocacy.

State level.

l0 Policy makers were mobilized at this level i.e. within the Ministry of health, Finance, and Ministry

for Local Government to inform the leaders on the current status of the programme especially as

regards funding, as well as the need to ensure sustained yearly funding at both State and LGA level.

The UNICEF representative visited the State in company of two members of the NOCP, but was

unable to meet with the policy makers. The Director PHC was however met and the concerns about

the projecg especially as regards funding, was expressed to her. She pledged to convey the message to

the relevant administrators.

The advocacy to the Ministry for local Government was to follow-up on the promise by LGA leaders

during the stakeholders' meeting of December 2004, to give a mandate for central deduction of funds

for sustaining of CDTI activities at that level. While the effort at State level yielded result, same could

not be said of the Ministry for local government. The difficulties being faced at both Sate and Local

Govemment level is due to the current political environment where funds are hardly released for

activities. The local government funds are alleged to be mostly withheld by the State government

thereby frustrating conduct of activities therefore in spite of several efforts, little achievement was

been made because no mandate has been given.

It is therefore suggested that a high powered advocacy team comprising of WHO,APOC, UMCEF as

well as other NOTF personnel be made to visit the newly elected State government in June or July

2007 to help improve on the current situation.

LGA Level

A total of 632 policy makers and traditional leaders were mobilized to solicit for both moral and

financial support to the programme. The situation at Borgu, Wushishi, and Bosso LGAs was given

special consideration in view of low coverage as well poor compliance by both programme

implementers and communities. Several stakeholders' meetings were held with traditional leaders and

the LGA policy makers in attendance for ensuring improvement during the next treatrnent round.

t4 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 21: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Conmunitv level

Communities were mobilized for self monitoring and stakeholders' meetings in order to check/address

problems of CDD attrition, as well as poor treatrnent compliance, which is currently the problem in

some LGAs. It would indeed be appropriate for APOC to sustain funding for conduct of such an

activity in order to check the above threat

2.3. Mobilizttion, sensitization and health education of at rtsk communities

hovide information on:

- The use of media and/or other local systems to disseminate information

- Mobilization and health education of communities including women and minorities

- Response oftarget communitieVvillages

- Accomplishments

- Suggest ways to improve mobilization and sensitization of the target communities.

A documentary was produced on Onchocerciasis control in Niger State, by the initiative of the

National Television Authority, Minna network centre, free-of-charge, and aired both locally and

nationally in several slots which lasted over five days and this helped to increase awareness on the

CDTI. Demand is high for Mectizan and we are informed that acceptance of Mectizan enhanced

acceptance of polio immunization in some communities which were initially non compliant.

Large numbers of posters and other IEC materials produced since year 2005, were distributed to

affected communities through the LOCTs.

A total of 1,331 villages were mobilized in 15 LGAs, especially in Mariga, Borgu, Bosso, Rijau,

Mokwa and Katcha where new communities were added. The mobilization activities wer€ conducted

by some SOCT, LOCT and peripheral health care staff. Mobilization and health education efforts

have ensured good compliance in about 67%o out of the 2l CDTI LGAs. There is however need for

adequate release of funds at LGA level in order to ensure better supervision of activities by the

LOCTS.

l5 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 22: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Community involvement

Table 4: Communities participation inthe CDTI

* - Only partial reports were received.

N/A - Not Available.

Comment on:

- Attendance of female members of the communit5r at health education meetings

16 wHo/ApoC. 24 November 2006

District/LGA

Number of communities/villageswith community members as

supervisors

Number of CDDs and thecommunities involved

Number ofcommunities /villages

with female CDDsTotal no. Number

withcommunit5rmembers essupervisors

Bs

Percentage

Be=Bsl Bt*100

IVIaleCDDs

B1

FemaleCDDs

&

Total

Bc= B7+Bs

Number ofcommunitieswith female

CDDs

Bro

Bn=Bre/84*100

s in theentire

projectanea

BrKontagora 72 72 100 152 t52 0 0

Rijau t42 142 t00 292 0 292 0 0

Magama 52 52 100 r04 0 104 0 0

Mariga 271 270 r00 564 0 564 0 0

Mashegu t02 N/A N/A 216 0 216 0 0

Agaie 205 205 100 427 0 427 0 0

Lapai 2tt 2tt 100 596 596 0 0

Mokwa 145 N/A N/A s37 0 537 0 0

Rafi* t28 53 4t 203 0 203 0 0

Wushishi* 130 6t 47 130 0 130 0 0

Borgu* 403 230 57 470 2 472 2 0.5

Lavun 92 N/A NiA 235 0 23s 0 0

Shiroro r03 103 100 136 4 140 2 2

Gbako 62 62 100 96 0 96 0 0

Katcha* t66 145 87 257 0 257 0 0

Munya 140 140 100 283 0 283 0 0

Bosso* 154 t2t 78 218 0 218 0 0

Suleja l9 t9 r00 60 0 60 0 0

Gurara r38 lil 80 tt4 ) l16 ') 1.4

Agwara 65 N/A N/A 130 0 130 0 0

Tafa 72 72 100 t28 0 128 0 0

TOTAL2,872 2,069 72 sJ48 8 sJs6 6 0.2

Page 23: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

In general, how do you rate the participation of female members of the community meetings

when CDTI issues are being discusses (attendance, participation in the discussion etc).

lncentives provided by communities for the CDDs

Attrition of CDDs. Is attrition a problem for the project? If yes, how is it addressed?

Other issues

Attendance of female community members at community meetings constitutes about 50% of the

total gathering in about 50% of the project area i.e. where purdah (i.e. seclusion of women indoor)

is not the practice. Where purdah is in practice the attendance is zero except where a separate

meeting is held exclusively for the women. However, even where attendance is adequate, the

participation of the women in discussion is passive, because culture inhibits them from being vocal

in public. However, as earlier explained, when separate meetings are held for the sexes, the rcverse

is the case, and the kind of issues that are discussed are quite revealing. Such issues give indication

as to community compliance with treatment, coverage, CDD performance, attitude of supervising

FLHF staff, adequacy of Mectizan@, awareness on the programme, as well problems on payment

of CDD incentives.

More often, the scenario in over 50% of the project area is one where only the elderly women are

permitted to participate and fully contribute to discussions at public meetings. The female elders

are expected to debrief the other women in the community, at another separate gathering of

women. The elderly women are often the TBAs in the community and they double as mobilizers,

since they are the women goup leaders.

The issue of provision of incentives varies with different socio-political areas of the State. In areas

where the community leadership is good, there is a system of communal contribution either in cash

or in kind which is usually handed over to the CDDs at the end of distribution. Most communities

contribute between US$0.1 to US$0.4 per household treated, with a result that CDD incentives

could be as much as US$37. Other CDDs are assisted with farm work while other communities

contribute foodstuff such as grains (millet guinea com, rice), yams, fish and several others.

Generally, all are supported with prayers. CDDs have often been elected into political posts, while

others, because of their hard work, were offered government paid jobs by their LGA councils. The

incentives paid to CDDs during the period of reporting was barely quantified by the LOCT,

however, the amount reported on from 5 LGAs was U.S.$1,025 in cash. However, in over 50%o of

the project are4 esperially where CDDs are selected along family lines, or at ward level,

incentives are not paid as a rule. This is because the communities view the CDDs role as one of the

t7 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 24: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

usual responsibilities expected from a family member towards his kindred. Such CDDs are quite

contented with this position, and appreciate the fact that their communities vest trust on them. The

community leaders and CBOs also assist with mobilization and supervision of treatment.

CDD attrition was a major problem this year however and this resulted in incomplete geographical

coverage of some of the affected communities. Reporting was delayed as a result of which about

28Yo of community data were not received at the time of compilation of this report. Several CDDs

dropped out because of lack of incentives especially in view of the fact that other members of the

same communities benefited from participation in Polio eradication activities while they were not

incorporated. Because of attrition, the current CDD to population ratio is l: 331 in contrast to

l:271 ofyear2005.

Meetings have been held with the community leaders with the aim of addressing such concerns.

The communities have been mobilized to either select distributors along family lines or if possible

at ward level in order to overcome such unfortunate developments. They have also been advised to

identifr a sustainable source of funding for long time treatment.

2.5. Capactty building

- Describe the adequacy of available knowledgeable manpower at all levels.

- Where frequent transfers of trained staff occur, State what the project is doing, or intends to do,

to remedy the situation. (The most important issue to describe is what measunes were taken to

ensure adequate CDTI implementation where not enough knowledgeable manpower was

available or if staffs are frequently transferred during the course of the campaign).

Generally there is 650lo knowledgeable manpower at State and LGA level, however in some LGAs

where it is inadequate for facilitation/supervision of CDTI, school head teachers are trained to

complement the efforts of the district health supervisors. This is typical of Borgu and Bosso LGAs.

The school head teachers are residents of the communities and their inclusion complements the

role ofthe health supervisors since there are extremely few PHC facilities within these LGAs.

The Ministry of health has made efforts to discourage frequent transfer of staffthrough holding of

meetings with the LGA/PHC directors as well as with the LGA policy makers, and Ministry for

Local Government, however this has not yielded positive results since these transfers occurred

even during the last quarter of year 2006. The directors themselves were transferred and this has

greatly frustrated achieving any meaningful impact, especially concerning checking the negative

attitude of some of the LOCT.

l8 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 25: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Three of the 8 participating State staff (SOCT), were also transferred, therefore, the supervision

schedule was neorganized to ensure that no LGA was neglected. Furthermore, new personnel

would be identified and trained on the job in order fill up the gap created and to reduce the

workload of the available staff.

Frequent transfer is a common phenomenon in some LGAs like Bosso, Rafi, Gurara and Borgu,

and this created a lot of problem with supervision, especially because such staff are replaced by

newly employed ones who have no training on the programme. The project therefore intends to

train all PHC staffwithin these LGAs as well as to institute CSM and SHM. Seminars will be held

for final year students of the schools of health technology from where such personnel are produced

in order to prepare them for supervision of CDTI wherever they are posted. Meetings have already

been held with the LGA policy makers to address such problems with the hope that such transfers

would be controlled.

LOCTs were highly constrained in movement and the district supervisors were mainly vested with

responsibility of overseeing implementation of CDTI activities within their locality.

ln view of cross border concerns with Benin republic, it is necessary to point out that although

Borgu LGA has about 6l%o of its' staff participating in CDTI, most of these personnel are

concentrated within the southern and south eastern axis, whereas the portion of that LGA that

immediately borders Benin republic, i.e. Babanna district, located in the western portion has only

13 health facilities and 15 trained PHC staffi.e. despite its' large area and long distances of up to

20 or 30 kilometers between communities. It was in view of this critical situation and the need to

ensure adequate supervision that school head teachers were trained and incorporated as supervisors

since year 2W4.lt will indeed be necessary to sustain this tempo in order fill in such resource

gaps, i.e. by retraining those on ground and training new ones. The funds for the special initiative

from APOC will help to achieve some of these objectives.

tg WHO/AFOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 26: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

p)

Xo,oF)

dD),(o

ooBo

t-o)

E

EDoI

@ctraa

FF: o

,f{A'

trD)rcF)

0aP.(D

D'ao

0a

pt5

0ep

c)oc

HF'

vp,

xoO)

oaoIF'

E'U2

.l(t

Fo

I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I t

zU(!o

69=3.(D+:ag

Fo0et,

DB

Fl

6

Fa

!.(\\t.

QoJorE

o

s

I

I

t

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I I

I

I I I I

l.J6tr)UJ N)

tJ@

a tJo\

t.)o\

tJ\o 5t'J

5 tJo(,rs o NJ

@ s OEo ?,.D

=*z--trir$: +

-(!.i leD=

ata

t,

@

o

o

o

s

{

tJ

t.Jo

5o

o\o

o

(rr

t.)o\

stJ)

o\\o

(,r

(,)Ur

(,o

5NJ

5UJ

o

{

-

5

(jUJ

o\-J

o

tJ(rl

NJ(,

a

O

o

o

o

o

(])

(,u.)

t4)o\

5

5o\

(,o

u)

OJ

2$e

!.(!rh

s8f EI I tJ(rr I

ztr

fHC-t

8o''6rl 't

HE9e'(!

Oo

1L

OB

F=

b,(!:t'

o-o-o trop+-+[3

s

o

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

5

I

5

i

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

t

I

t

I

I

I

5{(/)L,I

@

t,tJN)

5N)

t'J(,r\o

N)aos5{@

o\{(, {t'Jo\

oo\

o\(r.)o

5o\NJ

o6

{5 tJt)o

o\-J@

zE

d6-tootO

ilD

(Da.

:i3

Fe

>U.G\

o,o.o 3j56

"+ilP.

o

o

o

o

tJ6(,)

NJ@(JJ

o

t.J

{

tJUr{

NJ(,

{

\oo\

t.)o

t.Ja

5o

lrrL't

6o

N)tJ)(,

so\

(JJ

t.Jo\

5{N)

o

tJ.)o

(,Jo

o

I'Jo(/J

t\)o(l)

6

s\o

(n(,){

o\(,,r

5u)

u\oo\

\oUJ

-;(].)s

5N){

o

-6

-o\

-I6

sF@

(rto\5

a

\oo\

o5

(fJ

f.Joo\o

NJ\oN)

o

(Jrt'J

(JitJ

lsls.lR'l,r.

ss

oQ

F

sGF.trtG'G

t!GI

.S

otr\I\is.t(!

G

SS

tJ

o'o

"oN)52.oo56.D

N)

oo\

I I I

I

I

I t I

I I I I

1

I

Page 27: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

-oo\

a(D

(!(!

I

Fio,tF

*lp,

O:'0a{EF)

oBA'ts

age.F)

EDo00o

I I

I

I I

I

I

I

I

-oo\

(t

(D

(D

(D

t.)(,

(,{(, 5 (J)tJ6 5 (,.)

t)Ut

5\o-l

-IbJ

\otJ

;N)

N)s

tJ5

UrtJ

o

;tJ

tJA

o

t.J5

o

u.)Ol

;o\

.oo\

a('D

(D

(D

o\5

bJ(,lI

5

I

5

I

I

I

I

I I I

-oc\

fl(!lD

(D

t,a

stuo\(,

(,t{(,l

(])6@

(,5{

(,(,l

(,tJ

o{

5N)o\\o

Ut(JUlo\

t.J@

o

tJ6

())o

o

UJ

o\

o\

tJ

5o

o\o

o

N)

6

NJ

a

*zo{F(D

+r+)o.ot:

oFD

Ft

E)C(D

EEtoo.tD

=(DootoCA

oo-

oa

oD:

o!]YzF)F(D(n

(D

F:

(D

t!(t)

oo-og6ooot

qa

l.J

"oN)sz(!3d(DI

NJ

o,

I

I I I I

I I

Page 28: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Tahle 6: Type of training undertaken(Tick the boxes where specilic troining was conied out during the reporting period)

TraineesType

Of training

CDIh

OtherCommunitymembers e.gCommunitysupervisors

HealthWorkers(frontlineheelthfecilities)

MOHstafforOther

PoliticalLeaders Others(specify)

ProgrammanagementHow toconductHealtheducation

\/ \/ ,/

ManagementofSAEs

\/ \/CSM ,/ ,/SHM ,/ \/Datacollection

,/ ,/Data analysis \/ \/Reportwriting

,/Others(speci&)

- Any other comments

At State level

- Training was done on the job, and 4 SOCT members were equipped with knowledge and skills

to improve on their report writing skills.

A, LGA ICVCI

- FLI{F staffwere trained/retrained by the SOCT and LOCT. CDDs were trained/retrained by the

FLHFS.

2.6. Treatments

2.6.1. Treotme nt tig ures

- If the proiect is not achieving lffio/o geographical coverage and a minimum of 650/o

therapeutic coverage or the coyerrge rate is fluctuating, state the reesons and the

plans being made to remedy this.

22 WHO/APOC. 24 Novernber 2fi)3

Page 29: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Based on the data available at the time of submission of this report, the project achieved 65%

therapeutic coverage, 72%;o geographical because reports for 802 communities out of the 2,872

targeted were not received. Late commencement of treatment as well as poor attitude of some

LOCT to ensuring early compilation and submission of treatnent reports are the responsible

factors. The LOCT are generally demoralized because they do not receive any moral or financial

assistance from their leaders for smooth Mectizan distribution, therefore some of them resist

collecting the drug from the SOCT and others collect but do not care to release it to the

communities.

The poor attitude of some supervising PHC staff had a negative effect on coverage because

activities were not supervised in some areas, while some PHC staff did not even care to inform

the communities on availability of Mectizan. This is particularly true of Borgu and Bosso LGAs.

Meetings were held with the policy makers of such LGAs and they promised to ensure better

supervision of drug distribution through imposition of sanctions on defaulting staff. They also

pledged to ensure release of funds for LOCT travel during supervision, as well for conduct of

other CDTI activities. The need to integrate activities in PHC was again emphasized and the

heads of health pledged to ensure that is done.

Meetings were also held with the traditional leaders of defaulting communities, and they

expressed concern that they were not earlier informed about such problems. They then pledged to

ensure that all communities in their domain were always treated.

Communities were also mobilized to select CDDs along family lines or at ward level in order to

check the problem of attrition and low coverage.

)1 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 30: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

IFlS.IE.l;;rtrJ

GS

G

S

\hAFJI

.s=F.I

(:

SR

F

SGSas

E.+

XA)oF)*

odA),io

atoIo

t'E:

tEUot

0aF*

cIt(t,

*

vO)

*?ox{A)

t-eoED)

0aa)(D

A)6

(D0e

H.0aF)

F:oaO)

3F:

vstc

XoO)

0ao5p,

-El>6'

o\o\o\N) o

U)

\otJ 5o

UJu)o tJ

@s(,l

N) tJa(rl ot.J

t'J{ tJ 5l.J

{tJ

."Hgg-F=*eE 3 H.q

oo55

(D

n)0qG

o\o\6tJ ou)

\otJ

5ou)lJ)o I..J6 5(,|

tJ tJo(rt otJt.){ (,

N) 5tJ

{tJ Y a'>t'B =938?'e g(D=

t

5(rro\tJ ou)

z t'J(,Jo

o\ (.rl(,J z

t=N NJo

L,Iz NJ{o

(,rtJ 5

t'J{t'J -E z

s* ttU

€{ ao ooz (^{ s{ 5 z oo oo

z oo oo oo o q8C?Eo\(D Ol"ts9oa

=.(DoD)

U

,.U F{. ll

?

o\5-J\o

5eNJ

6

L'Iu)Ltr6t,

u)tJUJ

u)

NJ(.,Iooo

(rt)o{o6

oo55

\oP{55

UJtJ(n\ou)

{-@{tJ)o\

(Jr

J-J{o5N.){N5

\oN.)(,{

(/rtJUrN){

65{\o\o

9- 'Ola ob'g E=.>biD0 0o€ (D F.6E! 5 -(D:JEie6-

E'

oEcA)

o

(nF(])o\5

fJ)u){€u)

sUroo

t\)-J5(JJ

Noboo

(.,1o(jL'T

{P\oo\o

{It9tJUr

(,{@

o\o\(,6

5@s{

oo\66NJ

{{\o\o

tJ@

t'Ju)

{tJ(f)

;e >'6'E =93Ez'9 eL(D=

E'

5t'Jso\\o

(.)(r)tJs\o

5sb.@{

z q)UI(,)(,r5

(,)tJJL\oo

(r)

(,(no\

zt oI5o\\o

{tJUr

2,F (Jr

{lJro

@5@L'I(,

tJ{N)o(,

{tJb(,\o

z+rE e

Ef;TE'gq*- o

t

o\o\

@tJ)

oo(,) zt=

(n5

(ao\

UJ{ z €o \oNJ zt \o \o

N)6(,l a

o\ o-lO:f

36 r$-fi E(Dc!Yt+

o

so o o5z @

o

a \o z o o z 5\o o t, (i{ dO

$+9sEfg'auHS

Uro\@

\o6(n

z soo\o

tJa{(,5(JJ z o\oa

5\ot^J

zt=

-I(f)

o\(,o\\o

\os \oo\ &z

6^=5 Y*=6', 'r

o o o z o o o z o o z o o o o ?zaHH*

o o o z o o o z o o zt o o o E -.x Z

€[$E*rHr

tJs

o

pN)5z(D

3rttJoo5

Page 31: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

F.l

ortF

-lF)p oe{

A)IF)

oEID:IA:

C')

e.o,

IDo00o*

?

F)

I..)6{t.)

-I!.J o\(rr t,6

\o (,5 5o

bJ@{h)

-JNJ

o\(rt (,)6

\o (rr5 A

}.)co\\o

-JtJ z \o I..J 5o

-tt\) oz ooo oo

{@ oo

\t{5(,(,(,

(,r{(,r

o

5-@(Jrt)(,

{t))\o6

o\5t,-J

o\-6\o(,,lO

r-rr\o

{

5\ac5+

5-€(.)a6

5o{o\

6N55

t,5otJo\

(Jr{\oNJ(n

s)o{o5

t.(,t

5;J[.J6o\

z Ur{'o.\o\o

Uru)s(,

5N)@(,5

(,tJi,\o\o

c(, €tJ z {

@@UJ

o\t'J

F\o

@o\5

(,iL'I z t.J{o

(J)

(r)\o o {

N)

(,UIc o\\o

zE

@

5\o

(,l5 o

UJ{(,|

o z o o o

o z o o o o

ICz

tr

2,9gr{?EA: (+

-sF: ;-dr6'€

o=U)

{o(D

tDo9.oP

IEloIEIElslat4lolol3lc,Itrl=|.l!,pe

t:rl(DlitlA)tc,toItrla)loli,lo-toltDlo0aIA'lctl:'l()latlolot<lolEIO'oal(DN,,

-l(!FtoE

A(D\oEas r+vE'

oooD

oq(D

ts(D

-loo

aOro(o)(D

E)oet!g)

o

oooot|{DT

- ierx=va) goo(DF

F)oa(D

Eo,(D

il

4lzo lc'st3;HclFt3lod l+)ol()-r lOolE-) l:J3t=E t=.o l-}-> titri ls?rJ 14aD l=? li;gHO- lcD(Dl+3h6'Its8 18.

=lx

E156'q)

tr)V)

o.tD

s.oa.6Ffrl

o53ofoE.(DoF)os)

o-r6-] o::tbo=rsE'--LJ

A'()o.

3C(DFt

lloFt,oCD

€ 1tz6' gle= elJs. r 18'5 El-r0c 3lo=. 6l+', olc,E :lgI +11o rol(D.t ElrE 6.IBd 6loe 8'rg '+lo3 Ato6'EE8-(D

B3ila;4,OEqE

(D

t:. (Do5a))

=. 6'

5Doa[i,PAI'3s.oti,8Cd

{(D

= .8.(DoFl O)EA:3 F'

=ac)ooav?'o

@c,Ft

;'tiB;AOBil_:t -l(D:ta-(D

=Hxoa i.tA -ioo=E516=

bap6o()Fr

Oo(D

ciOdaotDO,- 5-PdTd6(D

3ts68.'(,.8. :(D56tD+(attt g!r=L -cto.E5s(1o-Xirrc5aE'8-EBE

U)Aes;.+5e'+C(D-jrocj .4.E8!t o,

3EA.=o=!ro,oa?r.Sd-(Dg6;.+ C)5rEo-€.{(D5o(D

ta'oFt

9.(Do

tJLrr

=

'UopN}5zoI3crt!tJoo\

I

1t2.olcID IJ.o lro l-r-6 latr l;ao) lC,s- l(Dolo5 Ttr'

- ltt

3.1+Etg-. l(D5 lO-

=lxolH

Qlstl(DrtI

(D

o,(D

3o()o

oq)

{=3o!Ft,9.ooo,(Dte

>lz3|tr515El*flqBIB3loottru 16-

elBstE<lxtDt

lolo

Page 32: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

2.6.2 What are the causes of absenteeism?

Absenteeism is due to either poor community mobilization for treatment or selection of inappropriate

treatrnent time, whereby some community members would have traveled out of home either for

farming and other vocations.

2.6.3 What are the reasonsfor refusals?

Refusal is often due to fear of reaction to the drug or suspicion that the drug is for birth control

especially in inadequately mobilized communities.

2.6.4 Briefu describe oll known ond verifted seriaus adverce evenls (SAEs) that occurred during

the reporting period and provide (in table 8) the required information when available

In case the project did not have any cases of serious adverse events (SAE) during this reportingperiod, please tick in the box.

No SAE case to report

I

,/

)(r WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)4

Page 33: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

a*

oa(D

aox

9<J.=

OA-r.E5 (ia(ao

UD)

o(DoNTD

sb

o)x'o

D@@tsE iEo ,5(DE X-o:l 2o-j

a5!o3q

$F*Hg55D) l-lE.E +Xi:J0 ^

5"5'

;t+gobO@lD;5 5 05 :v 6'o-gst

9eF3 =(Da ='@-r_^ =- cto

6+,o.6@

pooEA3AA=a3d;' 'ro

oolTtrgXE€ g@oogEa.:,

=.!,8dT

= 3'>

: igggs(D

llrJls'ls.lR'leoU,Gv,

v,(!

SaEF.(!:rI(!GdDa91AF:

ssS(:(i

(!\

Oe

sG

ES

OE

!G

*atDrl

F)

g

d(Drto+t

(D,oO)

(D

l.J{

EoptJ5zo@5d(!N)a5

Page 34: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Hls hE'!FI*3i.E StFSt(D=S-rdSlHs SeS E-rS:iPs R.

EFN3l$Eil:lSnl$slt. d l.ilsigbs.!R]E.los.i

Gi.

asE+t F.'rrr' ! =E't:rrqX(DSiodsn

t.\

FB$sG\B\E'*Bi.*=XSDG=tt1 i.-rrEGAF.ss(!v3

oe(D

BaEo

E.

t)

o\

i.Jo(Jr

t\)o5

l.J

o(j)

t\)

N.)

tJ N)

o \o\o\o

\o\o€\o\o\t

tr,

F

N@{N)

N)-J5

N)(,|(,|tJ

NJ(/l@(j)

{\ou)

o\5\o(j\o

tJ6(,) @(,) tJ

(!arlEv

E H E,E 'l(! i,oQ I o3 qB =

B='ar-.r

i

:E iB' iBrtS

tr,

oc

.Dto

t9BEIrDao

J')6\tl.J

-l')-I5Ur

t.J(/t(,NJ

t.)

5\o o6

UJ6(j

{UJo

(rlo\{

\o@(/) l.J

rJJ}to=BE

oET

oa

('D

lll

tJo\\o

NJ5@

t.)Ur(rlI'J

tJN)ou)

{{o\

o\(])5

(,tJtJ

5o5

o\-JNJ

t,

o + f.8 z= At c

,FE.e3E9,t8' F=. E

--It.J

@6 oo

6L't

\o\o

\o\o 5Ur

UJ-J

l..Jt,(t/

YJ

E*+Ef E$

--ItJ O

@ oo o O 6{ { o\

oaaO

^E o*9'rs,H o; lrl{ir

It!F

o

{-J5())(r)(])

o\UJNJO-J\o

5t,\oo\o

o\@-t(,\oo\

otJ5o\Or5

\oo\\o(^)UT

\o(,|J')(,I\oN)

\o(,rP(,oo

\oo5())oo

\oooo

il093 E

trE gE*[3-=.8 E-rl^r+

:g

E

E

o

5\o55o

UJ{o\o5o\

tJ\oo\@s

s{(,{tJ

6o\o{€

@sN)(,ls

(,)(,o\'\o5NJ

5ooI(J'oo

5(JJ

5oo

l'.Jo\\o19o\a

EgeF'{

U)u)

l..J(,tJeo

tJ5N){t'Jo\

o\otJoo\\o

{\oI6o\(,,l

{o\€\otJ)

(])

s5aA

N)\o@oao

tJ@Is\o@

tJ{I6UJN)

za=t EeqErEs*- o

FT6

o\ {-t

6 o\(, -l€ {\o tJJ{ UJ u)tJ

u) 8,rQ$ -.Eoo(D6=

F'e

E, E'69*ll

o{{ \o \o

o\\oOr

\otJ

\o5

@@

o\t.J

o\o\ o

lJ)ao

a{ }Sg'l"Ho(D

tatO

raF{^jil

--.t{ \o \o6

{{*o\ (,

\o N)5

b.Ju) tJN)

N) o

8'EEOQ

tJ@

o

_oN)5zoo3rtJoo\

Page 35: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

,/

2.7. Ordering, storage and delivery of tvermectin

Mectizan@ ordered/applied for by - @lease tick the appropriate answer)

MOH wHotr TTI\IICEFtr NGDOE

Other (please specifu):

Mectizan@ delivered by - Qtlease tick the appropriate onswer)

MOH f] WHOtr TiNICEF NGDO!

Other (please speciff):

Please describe how Mectizan@ is ordered and how it gets to the communities

The Federal Ministry of HealthA.,lOCP office orders for drugs while UNICEF takes responsibility

for its'clearance on arrival at the Nigerian port. It is also responsible for its' storage prior to

collection.

The quantity of Mectizan@ required by the project is calculated based on 84o/o of the total census

population and that figure is multiplied by 3 to obtain the accurate drug requirement for the

project. Approval to collect drugs is obtained from the NOCP zonal office at Kaduna, and the

State collects its drug allocation from NOCP National office at the Federal Ministry of Health.

After collection, release is made accordingly to the LGAs. LOCTs release drugs to district health

supervisors, while the communities collect their requirement from the district health facility

within their locality or from other agreed collection points. In the case of very distant

communities, drugs are deposited at the nearest frontline health post/facility for convenience of

collection. It is pertinent to note that all drug requirements are determined through the same

calculation procedure as employed for drug requisition by the State. The delivery process is as

follows:-

LOCTs

COMMUNITY

,/

NOCPHEADOUARTERS

SOCT

FLHFs

COMMUNITY

DHS DISTRICT/WARI)HEADS

\i{ +

COMMUNITY

)9 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fr)4

Page 36: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

State/DistricULGA

Xumter of wtectizan" tabletsRequestcd Reccivcd Used Lost Wasted Erpired Remaining

Kontagora 238,000 238,000 173,103 136 0 0 64,761

Rijau 386,000 386,000 250,667 1,715 0 0 133,618

Magama 233,000 233,000 215,760 3,886 0 0 13,354

Mariga 329,075 329,075 320,306 t46t 0 7,308

Mashegu 143,000 143,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 143,000

Agaie 194,000 194,000 180,075 I ,83 1 0 12,094

Lapai 337,000 337,000 310,979 399 0 25,622

Mokwa 210,000 210,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 210,000

Rafit 213,000 213,000 94,084 160 0 118,756

Wushishi* 164,000 164,000 82,970 0 81,030

Borgu* 480,000 480,000 264,343 208 0 215,449

Lavun 89,000 89,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 89,000

Shiroro 134,500 134,500 lll,223 1,406 0 0 21,871

Gbako 90,000 90,000 81,930 t2 0 0 8,058

Katcha' 164,000 164,000 I 15,860 1,619 0 46,521

Munya 155,000 155,000 145,285 55 0 9,660

Betto+ 177,000 177,000 I 18,641 398 0 57,961

Suleja 140,000 140,000 130,144 70 0 9,786

Gurara 175,000 175,000 156,784 1,710 0 16,506

Agwara I14,000 I14,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 114,000

Tafa lll,612 1ll,612 lll,4l7 159 0 0 36

TOTAL 4?77,187 4277,187 2,863,571 15,225 0 r198"391

Toble 10: Mecltztn@ Inventory

* - Only partial reports were received.

N/A - Not yet Available.

How are the renoining tvermectin tablets collected and where are they kept?

- The remaining tablets are retrieved from the LGAs and kept at State level for subsequent

utilization.

- Remaining Ivermectin tablets are collected from the communities through the FLHFs and

submitted to the LGA Oncho. coordinators through the district PHC supervisors. The LGA

coordinators submit all remaining tablets to the State coordinator and such drugs are kept at

r{) WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 37: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

the project office for the next distribution round i.e. if the expiry date is not close. However, if

they are required for urgent utilization by other projects or are almost expired, they are

transferred to the NOCP Zone C, officer for further action.

List and briefly describe the activities under ivermectin delivery that are being carried

out by health care perconnel in the project area.

Healthcare personnel hold regular meetings with communities and their leaders to ensure

effective conduct of CDTI activities.

They sensitize and mobilize the communities (through health education) for ownership of

CDTI.

They train the CDDs, and supervise yearly Ivermectin distribution.

They supervise distribution in order to ensure that communities receive drugs, the drugs are

properly managed, and that there is good treatment compliance, as well as ensuring that CDDs

keep accurate treatment records.

They provide feedback on Ivermectin distribution to the district health supervisors, LOCT,

SOCT and all other partners.

Health care personnel facilitate conduct of CSM and SHM through training and supervision..

Any other comments

Low morale, caused by poor funding of activities by government, is a major reason for poor

attitude to work which is exhibited by some health care personnel.

Any other comments

2.8. Community sef-monitoring and Staheholden Meeting

Has any training (of trainers) for community self-monitoring been done in the project area?

If so, When?

In years 2002, 2003, 20M.

?t WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 38: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

DistricU LGA

Total # ofcommunities/villages in the

entire project areaNo of Communitiesthat carried out selfmonitoring (CSIO

No of Communitiesthat conducted

stakeholders meeting(sHM)

Kontagora 72 l8 l8Rijau 142 24 36

Magama 52 t7 t4Mariga 270 34 46

Mashegu N/A N/A N/AAgaie 205 34 38

Lapai 2tl 26 36

Mokwa N/A N/A 0

Rafi* 53 t8 0

Wushishi* 6t 20 0

Borgu* 230 29 38

Lavun N/A N/A N/AShiroro r03 t7 52

Gbako 62 t6 2tKatcha+ 145 24 l8Munya 140 23 32Bosso* t2t 20 12

Suleja t9 6 8

Gurara lll l8 t4Agwara N/A N/A N/ATafa 72 l8 28

TOTAL 2,069 362 4tt

Table 11: Cotttnunily self-monitoring and Staheholden Meeting

Describe how the results of the community self- monitoring and stakeholders meetings have

affected project implementation or how they would be utilized during the nert treatment

cycle.

Pilot CSM and SHMs conducted in these LGAs revealed that some CDDs were discontented

about not being paid incentives by their communities, while members of communities who had

never served as CDDs were incorporated into programmes like polio+radication and guinea

worn surveillance. This informed the decision to work towards formulating a PHC directive such

that, wherever committed CDDs were pr€sent, they were also integrated into other PHC

7) WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 39: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

programmes, especially where financial or material rewards would be derived, in order to

encourage CDD retention. This action is already being applied in at least 5 LGAs and the benefits

are obvious since the treafinent coverage is quite good and there is very good CDD retention.

These LGAs are Magama, Kontagora, Agaie, Lapai and Gbako.

Information from some SHMs revealed that the communities had preference of a treatrnent

period, which did not conform with the period when drugs were usually released to them, and this

information helped to plan for Mectizan delivery at preferred treatment periods.

In the Kambari settlements (camps) there is distrust in a CDD from the same community

administering drugs to its' members, so the CDD from the main village is relied upon to visit the

neighboring wards (settlements) to administer drugs and this causes a lot of delay in completion

of treatment and reporting. These CDDs have to travel over distances of sometimes 20 to 30

kilometers apart and require assistance with bicycles from APOC.

2.9. Supervision

2.9.l.Provide aflow chart of supentision hierarchy.

2.9.2. jYhat were the moin issues identiJied during supervision?

The main issues identified include :-

(l)Drugs were being allowed to expire.

(2) There was no documentation on treatnent of some communities (especially those that are far

and hard to reach) for example, those at the border with Benin republic.

NOCP

SOCT

LOCT

DS

CDDsFLHFCSMs, Communilies,

Wllage heads

?1 WHOiAPOC. 24 November 2006

Page 40: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

(3) Geographical coverage was low and therapeutic coverage for some LGAs like Borgu, Bosso

and Wushishi were far below 65%. Drugs released to some LGAs were also not adequately

accounted for.

(5) Late submission of treatnent reports to the State.

(6) Inconsistency in Mectizan inventory records at different levels / Poor census.

2.93. Was a supentision checklist used?

Yes. One was developed by the SOCT to address specific issues of concern while the standard

checklist was utilized by the combined team of NOCP and UNICEF.

2.9.4. What were the outcomes at each level of CDTI implementdion supervision?

State level

(l) The outcome of NOCPAJNICEF supervision indicated that there is need for adequate

supervision of the LOCT by the SOCT since drugs released for 6 months had not been

distributed in some LGAs, while year 2005 treatment report indicated that some LGAs had

very low coverage.

(2) Absence of counterpart funds at LGA level was having a severe effect on conduct of CDTIactivities.

LGA level

(l) High CDD athitior/Some CDDs wer€ not adequately trained and data entry was poorly done.

HeighVdosage calibration was also inaccurate. In one of the communities, drugs were

received by the CDD, but not distributed.

(3) Highly demoralized LOCT. There was hardly any release of counterpart funds at the LGA

level and the health statr (LOCT) did not supervise the FLHF staff in most of the LGAs.

Records were poorly kept at all levels and there was no duplication of those forwarded to

higher levels.

(4) There was frequent transfer of trained health staff leading to lack of supervision of some

communities.

(5) The directors PHC were not giving the necessary moral support to the LGA coordinators.

74 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 41: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Conmunitv level

(l) Treatment fatigue was observed to be the problem with many of the communities. There was

a feeling of good health and the communities no longer had the urge to comply with

treatment.

(2)The health staff were not adequately communicating with the traditional leaders, therefore the

leaders were not aware of release of Mectizan to the CDDs.

3) Mectizan was not released to the communities by the FLHF staffand when they requested they

were informed that there were no drugs because the programme had come to an end.

(4) Opposing political parties were exploiting the issue of payment of incentives to CDDs as a

tool against the incumbent government, by insisting that the payment should be done by

government rather than the people since healthcare is a social service that is their right.

2.9.5. Wasfeedboch gtven to the penon or groups supemised?

Yes, feedback was given at all levels.

2.9.6. How was thefeedbach used to improve lhe overall petforrnonce of the pmjea?

(l) Reminders were written to both the State Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Local

Govemment in request of release of counterpart funds. Advocacy visits were also made to

both Ministries to sensitize the leaders on need to release funds. LGA policy makers were

sensitized on the urgent need to release funds to the LOCT, and pledges were made to support

with funds. That promise was not actualized in most LGAs but is still viable and could be

redeemed. Meetings were also held with traditional leaders in Wushishi, Borgu, Bosso and

Gurara among several other LGAs and pledges were made for improvement.

(2) The State Ministry of Health released the sum of U.S.$15,873 for HSAM, supervision, as well

as for retrieval of outstanding treatment reports and drug balances that were not submitted.

(3) Meetings were held with the LGA authorities to inform them on the poor attitude of some

health workers, and action was taken to ensure that drugs were immediately released to the

benefiting communities and treatment commenced immediately. This was particularly so for

Bosso,Borgu, Wushishi,Mashegu, Mokwa ,Agwar4Lapai, and Agaie LGAs.

15 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 42: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

(a) In order to ensure 100% geographic and at least 84% therapeutic coverage of communities,

the SOCT compiled a comprehensive list of endemic communities and their projected

population and released Mectizan accordingly to the LGAs. This effort also helped to control

wastage.

(5) Adequate capacity was provided (for supervision of CDDs) through training and retraining of

health staff and other community supervisors like teachers (in Borgu LGA) where long

distance between communities makes supervision very difficult.

(6)The SOCT supported the LOCT to mobilize the communities for better compliance with CDTI

objectives and especially the need to sustain yearly treatment through both moral and

financial support to the CDDs.

(7) Communities were mobilized to select new CDDs i.e. where attrition had affected distribution

and all were trained, by the FLHFs and LOCT and treatment followed immediately even

though some as late as in December.

(8) Communities that had never been treated were mobilized for participation and treatment is

ongoing. There is promise of 1007o geographical md 84Yo therapeutic coverage in year 2007.

?(t WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 43: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

SECTION 3: Srryport to CDTI

3.1. Equipment

Toble 12: Stotus of equipment

*Condition of the equipment (F:Functional, CNFR:Currently non-functional but repairable,

WO:Wriffen off).

How does the project intend to maintain and replace eristing equipment and othermaterials?

This will be done through the normal government system, i.e through the vehicle maintenance

pool. Furthennore, the project intends to intensiff request for monthly standing imprest (running

cost) from the State approved budget line for recurrent expenditure which if provided, would

serve as a source of funds for equipment maintenance as well as for maintenance of other items.

The budget line for overhead i.e. State counterpart fund would also be intensely exploited for

ensuring sustained funding of project activities by government.

Even though funding at LGA level is currently very poor, there will be sustained mobilization of

the relevant authorities for the necessary fund release, the LGA coordinators have been

responsible for maintenance of project motorcycles attached to them and will continue since this

APOC MOH DISTRICT/LGA

NGDO OthersSource

Type ofequipment

No. Condrton No. Conditon No Condrtion No. Condition No. Condition

l. Vehicle I F I wo I wo2. Motor cycle(s) 22 l0F

6CNFR6WO

l6 wo

3. Computer(s) 2 lwolF4. Printe(s) 2 lwolF5. Photocopier (s) I CNFR6. Fax Machine(s) I F7. Others

a)Megaphones l0 Fb)Writing board I Fc)Overheadproiector

I F

Video player I FBicycles 65 20wo 50 woT.V. set I F

Manual typwriter 2 F

In-focus proiector I F

UPS I wo

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITIIIIIIITIIIIIIITIIIII

IIII

?7 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 44: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

is the usual practice over here. LGA administrators will also be encouraged to purchase

motorcycles and bicycles for the programme i.e where ever the need arises. Furthermore, efforts

will be made to ensure integration of the CDTI with viable projects like HIV/AIDS control, NPI,

malaria control etc. so that there would be central maintenance of all participating PHC vehicles.

APOC management has also been requested to replace some capital equipment before its'f,rnal

disengagement.

JR WHOiAPOC. 24 November 2006

Page 45: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

lsslR' \tF E'irt:s't=r:riasss.+;t.sR.\;sg!

SR$ESslF(s=:t 'rr.q2 la

ESqSs=ts- R.

3E'sG(!\<Gic,jtaFSSI

:ht\).g\

(JJ\o

'!otJ5zoE6(D

t\)o5

rlortF

-l>: r-oao;oo

ooj3c3.

o2EAo6 xHr V\'9,

z.--iO

H8.

C?b6>E

a<b)uo* s<

Ee

\o6-Io

t\)6\o5

UJ

5

t)Foo o

tJ-N-INJo EEsE

r

oD

toce(,Ia\o(.4

oooo

oo

5(j

--I

N)

@

(,6

t\)l.J{t'J(,

-r0O-lEFB9

t.D-o

t\)5-IUl -Joo

(,6@

tJso

5\o

eEEEo

oI

NFo

UI5\o(,r

5N)5O

6o\*-I

2,EAaEre9

otsEL

\oc5t\l

o\ tJ5O

o(f){

5

O CEsEB

(DE(ra

nooeo\\oo\

(,(,

O

5o,

-ootJ@

{tJ6-a

:c!oaa Fegla>(!F

\co5t\)o

o\t.)

hJo

z NJs zt-

5UJ

OE!OB

EEAE(Dt,5to

-(ra\o€tJ€(,l

{o UJ(,) NJJ.lt,5o\

-Jo5erEO.lEFgF

(D-aL

\o6(,o\(,

UJ

o

NJ

NJtJ

o\{tJo

(J)

o\oo

alEO-l^E E Fr

gE-i t'Dtg

(,l

t\)o5-It,

t,{(,a -O O.N)3"8;

8aE -

N)'t.l1..)

;3E E E FT"Hg" g€- '""'9;.

OFi-P h ?"o.3>5K{{{N)

)1AaHFA9

6HOL

Oo\

o(n

5o\o{

I O zt tJ

N)@o\

N)tJNN)N)

oEsol

EEAE i;<40 t!-rr=o\trN)+t-rn(,t

(.)l,o\e

Hc) (D-H

- 9 a. h,"oFS rod {b3 x E '''L@ AJa o sg-+o\*

zt 9G&ta (,-oPq

562!O'lEFAS

OFA-o\

UT6I.)-tt\)

o\t)6

5N)

z (})\oo,6

l.J

6\o

aEO,i

EEAE d<60t9

t:ilPrtEs9o\

(ra\0

EDH+FE TBEe+-; a56gg

'4(Ita

-9ItJNNJ

zt-

9Gs(a-6vo €{ =rUO-lEFES(l-

I

Page 46: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

(2) If there are problems with release of counterpart funds, how were they addressed?

While the State released funds, there were indeed severe problems with release of counterpart

funds at LGA level. All effort made to ensure release at LGA level was futile.

- Additional comments

It is recommended that advocacy visit be made to the newly elected government between June

and July 2007 by a high powered team of APOC,LINICEF and NOCP to solicit for bulk release

of funds, possibly for 4 years duration.

33. Aherforms of communtty support

(3) Describe (indicate forms of in-kind conhibutions of communities if any)

In-kind conffibutions by communities include assistance with farm work, prayers, supervision by

village heads and CBOs, support with community mobilization, giving of food stuff to CDDs,

provision of transport or transport fare to collect Mectizan@ from agreed points, nomination of

CDDs into politically elected posts such as local councillors or LGA council chairmen,

employment into government paid jobs, and recommendation for inclusion of CDDs for other

incentive giving social services like polio eradication and guinea wonn surveillance.

3.4. Eryenditure per acttvtty

(4) Indicate in table 14, the amount expended during the reporting period for each activity

listed. Write the amount erpended in US dollars using the current United Nations

exchange rate to local currency. Indicate exchange rate used here US 1.00 to#126.

Tahle 14: Indicate how much the project spentfor each activily listed below during the reportingperiod

ActivityExpenditure

($ us)Source(s) of

fundinsDrug delivery from NOTF HQ area to central collectionpoint of community

2,000Gov't

Mobilization and health education of communities 5,000 Gov't/UnicefTraining of CDDs 6,000 Gov't/UnicefTraining of health staffat all levels I1,000 Gov't/APOCfunicefSupervising CDDs and distribution 4,500 Gov'VAPOC/UnicefInternal monitoring of CDTI activities ? Gov't/UnicefAdvocacy visits to health and political authorities 6,000 Gov'UAPOC/Unicef

IEC materials

Summary (reporting) forms for treatment

40 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2004

Page 47: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

(2) If there are problems with release of counterpart funds, how were they addressed?

While the State released funds, there were indeed severe problems with release of counterpart

funds at LGA level. All effort made to ensure release at LGA level was futile.

- Additional comments

It is recommended that advocacy visit be made to the newly elected government between June

and July 2007 by a high powered team of APOC,UNICEF and NOCP to solicit for bulk release

of funds, possibly for 4 years duration.

3.3. Otherforms of communtty support

(3) Describe (indicate forms of in-kind contributions of communities if any)

In-kind contributions by communities include assistance with farm work, prayers, supervision by

village heads and CBOs, support with community mobilization, giving of food stuff to CDDs,

provision of transport or tmnsport fare to collect Mectizan@ from agteed points, nomination of

CDDs into politically elected posts such as local councillors or LGA council chairmen,

employment into government paid jobs, and recommendation for inclusion of CDDs for other

incentive giving social services like polio eradication and guinea wonn surveillance.

3.1. Eryenditure per acttvtty

(4) Indicate in table 14, the amount erpended during the reporting period for each activity

listed. Write the amount expended in US dollars using the current United Nations

exchange rate to local currency. Indicate erchange rate used here US$1.00 to#126.

Table 14: Indicate how much the project spenlfor each acttvity listed below during lhe reportingperiod

ActivitvExpenditure

(s us)Source(s) of

fundinsDrug delivery from NOTF HQ area to central collectionpoint ofcommunity

2,000Gov't

Mobilization and health education of communities 5,000 Gov't/Unicef

Training of CDDs 6,000 Gov't/UnicefTraining of health staffat all levels I1,000 Gov'VAPOCfunicef

Supervising CDDs and distribution 4,500 Gov't/APOCfunicef

Internal monitoring of CDTI activities ? Gov't/UnicefAdvocacy visits to health and political authorities 6,000 Gov'VAPOCAJnicef

IEC materials

Summary (reporting) forms for treatment

40 WHO/APOC- 24 November 2fi)4

Page 48: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Vehicles/ maintenance 1,587 Gov't

Office e. etc 100 Gov't

Others to 2,500 Gov'VUnicef

TOTAL 38,687

Total number of persons treated I,153,311

(5) Any comrnents or qlnnotions?

The support for field activities from UNICEF was for focused attention to Borgu LGA in view of

consistent low coverage and the need to address cross border concerns with Benin republic. This was

an outcome of the monitoring visit by both UNICEF and NOCP to the State in October.

SECTION 1: Sustainability oICDTI

4.1. Internal; independent participatory monitoring; Evaluation

4.1.1 Was Monitoring/evaluation carried out during the reporting period? (tick any of the

following which are applicable)

Year I Participatory Independent monitoring

Mid Term Sustainability Evaluation

5 year Sustainability Evaluation

,/ Internal Monitoring by NOTF

Other Evaluation by other partners

4.1.2. What were the recommendations?

The recommendation of the internal monitoring by the NOTF was that:-

(l) The LOCTs should be constantly supervised.

(2) More CDDs should be selected in the larger communities in accordance with CDTI guidelines.

(3) Communities should be better supervised in order to ensure good treatment compliance

(4) Census up date should be completed in parts of the project where it had not been done.

(5) The State and LGAs should be adequately funded for susainability.

4l WHOiAPOC. 24 November 2006

Page 49: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

4.1i. How hwethey been imPlenunud?

(l) Monitoring and supervision is being intensified to ensure compliance with CDTI objectives.

There is plan to develop and produce integrated checklists for use by the PHC department in

order to promote the required integration.

(2) The State PHC departrnent holds regular meetings with policy makers and informs them of

developments. The LGA/PHC directors have been sensitized to ensure feedback on conduct of

CDTI activities through holding of regular review meetings together with the district and FLHF

staff. Problems should be identified at all levels and successes commended.

(3) The State and LGA policy makers will continuosly be mobilized for release of counterpart funds.

(4) Communities are being mobilized for adequate support to CDDs and would continue to be, in

order to ensure good retention as well as selection of more CDDs at ward level as well as along

family lines.

4.2. Sustainability of projects: plon and set targets (mandatory at Yeor 3)

Was the project evaluated during the reporting period? No.

Was a sustainability plan written? Yes.

When was the sustainability plan submitted? July 2005

What arrangements have been made to sustain CDTI after APOC funding ceases in terms of:

4.2.l.Planning at all relevant levels

This will be done at all levels as an integrated PHC plan with clear objectives towards sustaining the

strengths, improving on the weaknesses and taking advantage of opportunities presented through

implementation of an integrated action plan. Integrated planning will be done annually within the

PHC departments at State, and LGA level as reflected in the post-APOC/CDTI plans. Plans and

budgets are already available for year 2007 activities.

4.2.2.Funds

Government would be aggressively mobilized to release counterpart funds based on the activities on

the sustainability plans. A realistic budget is already available at State level and this has received

approval of the State government. The LGA budgets are also ready and awaiting release of funds.

SHMs will be held at all levels, and the Ministry for local government will be continuously

4) WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 50: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

pressurized to ensure cenml deduction of funds for Oncho. activities in accordance with the

resolution made at the State level stakeholders' meeting held in December 2004. Unfortunately

efforts so far made have not yielded much benefit.

At State level, high level advocacy visits will be made to the Ministry of finance as recommended by

the evaluation team. Moves will be made to obtain release of monthly standing imprest as was the

past practice, as this will assist the project to carry out minimal repair/maintenance of project

vehicles and equipment as well as for general running of office.

4.23 Transport (replacencnt and maintenance)

This will be done centrally in the MOH i.e. if counterpart funds are not available. The LGA project

motorcycles will be repaired and maintained with their own counterpart funds. LGA administrators

will be encouraged to purchase motorcycles and bicycles for the programme whenever necessary. At

State level, efforts will be made to ensure full integration of CDTI into active projects like AIDS

control, NPI, malaria control etc. so that there would be central maintenance of all participating PHC

vehicles i.e including the CDTI project vehicle.

APOC management will however be requested to replace some capital equipment

4.2.4. (hher resoutces

UNICEF has renewed its' commitment to the project through appointrnent of a new schedule officer.

Govemment along with other NGOs would have to sustain support in the absence of additional

external funding. Because of the current situation at LGA level, there is a serious funding gap but it

is hoped that other sour@s would be identified that will help to ameliorate the constraints being

experienced i.e. pending the arrival of a new government that might satisfr the hope for financial

release by government at all levels.

4.2.5.7o what ef,ent has the plan been implemented

The plan was written in year 2005 and its' full implementation is expected to be by end of December

2008 since it came into effect only in the year under review. Most activities especially at LGA level

were conducted in an integrated manner taking advantage of opportunity provided by the Polio

eradication programme.

4.3. Integration

Oulline the exlent of integration of CDTI into the PHC struc'ture and the plonsfor complete

integration:

47 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 51: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

Planning and budgeting is done in an integrated manner and the SOCT members have other

schedules (in PHC) which enables them to integrate CDTI activities with others. Integration of

vitamin A distribution was initially proposed by the project, but because UNICEF had already

integrated it with the intensified polio immunization campaign, it was not realized. Vitamin A is also

a part of the on going routine immunization package. Polio and measles eradication activities are the

current attractions, and moves are being made to train CDDs for integrated disease control as a part

of the routine CDD training/retraining programme. A workshop has been held and laminated

photographs have been provided by WHO for distribution to the CDDs. The special initiative from

APOC will provide opportunity for orientation of the CDDs.

While deliberate efforts are being made to ensure complete integration of activities at State level i.e

starting from planning to joint supervision, it is very strong at LGA level, because all healthcare staff

at that Ievel are given schedules that compel them to participate in campaigns such as mass

immunization, disease surveillance, malaia control and several other services, because these

personnel are also in charge of the health facilities within the project area.

4.3.1. Ivermectin deltvery mec h onisms

The Ivermectin for LGAs when not collected on schedule, is distributed from the State through the

LGA/NPI managers when they come monthly to collect vaccines for immunization or through other

personnel when they come in for other PHC activities.

- Ivermectin meant for communities is delivered through already established channels like M&E

officers' outing, or collection/delivery ofNPI vaccines to districts and communities.

The M& E officers are members of the LOCT, and their position provides opportunity for visiting

the district health facilities on a monthly basis i.e. while out on AFP surveillance.

4.3.2. Training

This activity is yet to be fully integrated, however several SOCT do participate in the NPI campaigns

and they utilize these opportunities to support targeted training on CDTI. Training will however be

integrated with other add-on activities such as primary eye care outreach programmes and malaria

control. Training is proposed for PHC managers and NGOs at State and LGA level to empower them

for better collaboration and networking as well as for joint supervision and monitoring. The proposed

integrated training of CDDs for integrated disease surveillance has already been mentioned above.

44 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 52: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

4.3.3. Joint supervision and monitoring with other progroms

During the year under reporq most of the SOCT and LOCT participated in PHC campaigns like

vitamin A distribution, malaria control, polio eradication etc, at State and LGA level, therefore

supervision of CDTI was integrated with such activities. Joint supervision and monitoring with other

PHC programmes is the current approach and these activities are already reflected in the 3-year

CDTI sustainability plans submitted. Integrated supervision checklists will also be developed for use.

4.3.4. Releose offundsfor project acttvities

Already there are approved PHC budgets with allocation for Oncho control for the current and

subsequent years. Release of funds will be effected through continuos strong advocacy meetings with

policy makers and traditional leaders. Efforts will be made to ensurc that Oncho. budgets are

continuously integrated within existing PHC budgets in order to effect release of funds.

4.3.5. Is CDTI included in the PHC budget?Ya.

4.3.6. Describe other health pmgrammes that are using the CDTI struAure and how this was

achieved What have been the achievements?

The WHO coordinated routine immunization programme is making effort to utilize a slightly

modified CDTI structure, for ensuring adequate service delivery at community level. Traditional

leaders are now involved in routine immunization activities, and health management teams are being

instituted at ward and community level to ensure self-monitoring.

4.3.7. Describe othen isszes considered in the integration of CDTI.

Other issues considered are that of conducting several more CDTI tasks at a time while out in the

field for PHC activities. There is a proposal to involve CDDs with all community based disease

confol programmes like polio eradication, community mobilization for HIV/AIDs control, home

treatment of malari4 as well as for distribution of insecticide treated bed nets.

A major issue of concern with disease control is the evident compartmentalization which is exhibited

strongly right from the top hierarchy of healthcare delivery. What often obtains is that different

programmes engage separate personnel at community level instead of the available CDDs for the

various activities, especially where incentives are involved without taking cognizance of the

available CDTI structure. In order therefore, for CDTI to serve as a vehicle for integration at

community level, there is the need for programme planners/implementers like WHO and other

45 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006

Page 53: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

agencies, to make conscious effort through policy formulation and advocacy for utilization of

existing resource personnel at community level.

4.4. Operotional researc h

4.4.1. Summarize in not more than one half of o poge the operational research undertaken in the

project area within the reporting period

None yet but there is the intention to undertake one, based on assessing the impact of Islamic

associations on women participation in social service delivery at community level. This proposal is

aimed at identifiing viable and effective means of ensuring better women involvement in healthcare

service at the peripheral levels with the aim of improving, as well as sustaining Mectizan delivery to

the end users for the long duration oftime required.

4.4.2. How were the results applied in the project?

Not applicable.

46 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 54: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

SECTION 5: Strengths, weahnesses, challenges, and opportunifies

- List the strengths and weaknesses of CDTI implementation prooess.

- List the challenges and indicate how they were addressed.

Stote level

Streneths

(l) Availability of adequate Mectizan and its' popularity.

(2) Opportunity for integration of activities with other PHC programmes

campaign.

(3) Availability of State counterpart funds in the year of report.

(4) Renewed commitrnent of UNICEF.

(5) Sustained support from APOC.

Weahnesses

like immunization

(l) Very poor funding at LGA level and generally unfavourable political environment.

(2) Late commencement of treatment due to slow response by the LOCT. Drugs had to be

conveyed to most of the LGAs before treatment commenced.

(3) Late submission of treafrnent reports. Only I I LGAs submitted complete reports while 4 LGAs

did not submit any report. The SOCT had to pay several visits to the LGAs before the current

report could be obtained.

(4) Inadequate institution of CDTI at Borgu LGA which shares border with Benin republic. The

area is very large and communities very hard to reach. Human resource and transport logistics

are very inadequate.

(5) Poor attitude of some LOCT leaders to integration. Poor supervision by the FLHFs.

47 WHO/APOC- 24 November 2006

Page 55: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

LGA Level.

Streneths

(l) Adequate Mectizan.

(2) Fairly good commitrnent of PHC staffin about 55% of LGAs

(3) Fairly good integration of CDTI with PHC

Weaknesses

(l) Very acute funding gap in all LGAV No release of counterpart funds.

(2) Delay in submission of treatment reports.

(3) Poor attitude of some PHC staff, therefore CDTI is not being fully integrated with other

activities. Wastage, due to expiry of unused drugs that were not returned after distribution.

(4) Poor supervision of FLHF staffby LOCT.

(5) Inadequate trained personnel in some LGAs e.g. at Babanna area of Borgu LGA

(6) FLHFs not adequately training or supervising CDDs.

(7) Inadequate transport logistics especially in border LGA like Borgu where distances from LGA

headquarters to some communities takes 8 to l0 hours due to extremely bad terrain.

(8) Frequent transfer of staffin some LGAs

(9) Several motorcycles are broken down and are yet to be repaired due to lack of financial release

by the LGAs.

(10) CDTI is not adequately instituted along border areas with Benin republic.

(l I ) Inadequate 2-way feedback to State and communities.

Communitv level

Strensths

(l) Good awarenesVacceptance of Mectizan.

(2) Receptive communities.

(3) Evidence of good ownership in over 55% of project area.

4R WHOiAPOC. 24 November 2006

Page 56: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

(2) Good commitment of some traditional leaders

(3) Committed CDDs in some parts.

Weaknesses.

(t) Inadequate CDDs. High CDD attrition. The much funded National immunization programme had

a negative effect on the CDDs since only few do benefit from participation despite their long time

commitnent to distributing Mectizan to their people even when they not being paid any

incentives.

(2) Reduced commitment of some community leaders to ensuring support for CDDs.

(3) Reducing community treatnent compliance due to fatigue.

(4) Inadeq uate comm unity geographic coverage.

(5) Poorly mobilized communitiesin25%o of project area.

(6) Inadequately trained CDDs. Inaccurate transfer of treatnent data from registers.

C h alle nees/ Opoortun ifi es

(1) Meciizan delivem

Activities like training, Mectizan delivery, advocacy and supervision were largely integrated into

the polio immunization activities at LGA level, some SOCTs participated in training and

supervision, thereby utilizing the opportunity for conduct of targeted CDTI activities. All LOCT

were integrated into the National Immunization Days (NIDs) activities.

(2) Advococy to Stole Polict ruherc

Ministerial management meetings were employed to sensitize the new Honourable Commissioner

of Health for release of funds for oncho. control activities while the involvement of the State

director of Budget in PHC project monitoring helped to facilitate release of State counterpart fund

during advocacy to the Ministry of Finance.

4q WHOiAPOC. 24 November 2006

Page 57: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

(3) Puhlic owareness for imoroved drug acceolance

Collaboration with the State unit of the National Television Authority (NTA) produced a

documentary that was produced and aired free-of-charge for further creating awareness on the

programme.

(3) Motivation of CDDs/ reduction of CDD attrition:

Some CDDs from communities that did not give incentives were incorporated to participate in

mass immunization activities from where they received some cash benefits.

- Communities with strong family aftiliation were encouraged to select CDDs along family lines

thereby increasing number and reducing demand for incentives.

(4) Egremelv delaved reoorttns bv LGAg/collection of reports bv S(rcT

Funds released by the State was utilized by the SOCT for travel to defaulting LGAs for conduct

of several activities like collection of outstanding treatment reports/drugs, advocacy to LGA

leaders, meetings with the PHC team, 'spot-check' monitoring/validation of treatment as well as

Health education/Community mobilization

SECTION 6: Uniquefeatures of the project/other mafrerc

Cross-border concetns with Benin Republic

This project is one of the largest, and this makes conduct of activities very difficult and demanding,

especially in view of gross under funding by government, coupled with the funding gap caused by

inability of the LGAs to sustain support to the project since year 2005.

Borgu LGA is of special reference here, because of cross border concerns with Benin Republic. The

support from UNICEF as well as that of the State govemment helped to address several of the

concerns about that LGA.403 communities are cumently listed with over 200 in the border district of

Babanna. Treatment commenced in several communities only in December and most of the fieatment

reports are yet to be received to determine the outcome of the effort made.

To give an insight into the enormity of the problem, it is necessary to explain here that Borgu LGA is

the largest in Niger State occupying about 25Yo of the total land area while the region of concem -

Babann4 comprises of 50%o of the whole LGA. The distances between communities range from 30

50 WHO/APOC. 24 November 2fi)6

Page 58: ANNUAL COMMUNITY - apps.who.int

to 40kms on an average. There is the need to boost (strengthen capacity for haining and supervision

at that level, while there is need to support the LOCT with 2 motorcycles and provide at least 40

bicycles that will help to facilitate movement by CDDs during conduct of CDTI activities.

While sincerely appreciating APOC's support, it is our sincere hope that it can assist (as a special

intervention) with the necessary funds and logistics for addressing the cross-border concerns.

5l WHO/APOC. 24 November 2006