Annexure –I

Risk assessment to be done by 3D Model

Risk assessment study by 3D model is under process and it

will take another 6-7 days for completion. Hence, risk

assessment report by 3D model will be submitted at the

time of presentation.

Annexure-II

Report on Prediction of Ground Level Concentrations of Air Pollutants

PREDICTION OF GROUND LEVEL

CONCENTRATION

OF

AIR POLLUTANTS

OPERATION OF

Deepak Nitrite Ltd.

Plot No. 1-7 & 26-31, Dhatav MIDC – Roha-402116

Dist – Raigad, Maharashtra state

Introduction :

Proposed project is a modernization/product mix of existing products in the category of synthetic organic chemicals and allied projects in existing manufacturing facility located at MIDC Dhatav, Roha. It is included in activity 5(f) under category B-1 of EIA notification 1533 dated 14/09/ 2006.

Existing manufacturing capacity of the unit is 822 MT/M. By-products 371 MT/M are also generated. With this change in product mix the total quantities of products and by-products will be 740 MT/M and 371 MT/M respectively.

Location of sources of air pollution: The project site is situated in Plot No. 1-7 & 26-31, Dhatav MIDC, Roha, Raigad.-402116, State-Maharashtra. The project site is situated in MIDC Dhatav . It is a notified industrial area where the land is owned by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) and leased to the Company. The land is meant for industrial activity.

A. Following heat generating equipment are used in this factory premises:

Sr No

Equipment Number off

Fuel used Operation

1. 8 TPH steam boiler 1 Indian coal Normally used

Imported coal

2. 8 TPH steam boiler 1 Furnace Oil Emergency

3. 6 lac Kcal/hr thermopac 1 Indian coal Normally used

Imported coal

4. 4 lac Kcal/hr thermopacs 2 Furnace Oil Emergency

5. 750 KVA D G set 2 HSD Emergency

6. 500 KVA D G set 1 HSD Emergency

B. Fuel and its consumption:

Boiler Thermopac Boiler Thermopac DG sets

Capacity 8 TPH 6 Lac Kcal/hr

8 TPH 4 Lac Kcal/hr

750 KVA

500 KVA

Utilization Regular Regular Stand by Stand by Emergency

Fuel used Indan or imported Coal

Indan or imported

Coal

FO FO HSD HSD

Fuel consumption

32.83 / 20.53 TPD

1 TPD

9.0 TPD

1.0 TPD

135 kg/hr

90 kg/hr

Stack details:

Boiler Thermopac Boiler Thermopac DG sets

Capacity 8 TPH 6 Lac Kcal/hr 8 TPH 4 Lac Kcal/hr

750 KVA 500 KVA

Stack Height 34 m. 24.50 m. 20 m. 11 m. 4.50 m.

Stack dia. 1.20 m. 1.20 m. 1.0 m. 0.20 m. 0.20 m.

Stack gas Temp.

1620C 1600C 1600C 1550C 2070C 1900C

Flue gas Velocity

5.30 m/s 2.50 m/s 3.0 m/s 3.0 m/s 15.70 14.60

Flue gas rate 14746 Nm3/hr

10178 Nm3/hr

12214 m3/hr

8490 m3/hr

1140 Nm3/hr

1075 Nm3/hr

D. Expected Emission:.

D-1 : 8 TPH Boiler -- (Regular use)

8 TPH Boiler

Fuel used Imported Coal Indian Coal

Fuel consumption 20.52TPD (855kg / hr) 32.53TPD ( 1355 kg / hr)

Fuel analysis 10 % ash 1 % Sulfur

38 % ash 1 % Sulfur

Total ash generated 2.05 TPD or 85.50 kg/hr 12.36 TPD or 515 kg/hr

Bottom ash (20 %) 0.410 TPD 2.47 TPD

Fly ash (80 %) 1.64 TPD ( 0.068 T/hr ) 9.88 TPD ( 0.411 T/hr )

Fly Ash going after APC of 90% efficiency

0.164 TPD ( 0.0068 T/hr )

0.988 TPD ( 0.0411 T/hr )

PM 10 25%

0.041 TPD

0.247 TPD

PM2.5 30%

0.049 TPD

0.296 TPD

Stack height 34 m.

Total SO2 emission rate 17.10 kg/hr or 0. 41 TPD

27.10 kg/hr or 0. 65 TPD

Total NOx emission rate 6.10 kg/hr or 0.146 TPD 9.48 kg/hr or 0.22 TPD

D. Expected Emission:.

D-2 : 8 TPH Boiler and 6 lac/kcal/hr thermopac

8 TPH Boiler

( Stand By ) Thermopac

6 Lakh Kcal/hr Normal use

Fuel used FO Imported Coal

Fuel consumption 9 TPD ( 375 kg / hr) 1 TPD ( 41.66 kg / hr)

Sulphur 4% 1 %

PM10 Negligible 0.002 TPD 25 % of QPM

PM2.5 Negligible 0.0024 TPD 30 % of QPM

Stack height common stack 24.5 m.

Total SO2 emission rate

30 kg/hr i.e. 0. 41TPD 0.83 kg/hr i.e. 0.020 TPD

Total NOx emission rate

6.10 kg/hr i.e. 0.146 TPD

0.43 kg/hr i.e. 0.01 TPD

D. Expected Emission:

D-3 : 4 lac/kcal/hr Thermopac and D G sets

2 nos Thermo pack 4 Lac Kcal /hr

Stand by

DG set - 750 KVA- 2 nos.

Standby

DG set 500 KVA- 1 no.

Standby

Fuel used FO HSD HSD

Fuel consumption 2x1 TPD ( 83 kg / hr)

2 X 300 Lit/hr ( 270 kg/hr)

100 Lit/hr (90 kg/hr)

Sulphur content 4 % 1 % 1 %

Stack Height 20 m. 11 m 11 m.

Total SO2 emission rate

6.66 kg/hr or 0.16TPD

5.4 kg/d or 0.13 TPD

1.8 kg/d or 0.04 TPD

Total NOx emission rate

3.268 kg/hr or 0.08 TPD

4.10 kg/d or 0.09 TPD

1.2 kg/d or 0.028 TPD

Prediction of incremental concentration of air pollutant is done for both the Boilers and DG set working independently, under the worst case of emissions.

E. Air estimation : Air quality estimation is done with Plausibility approach using Gaussian Plume Model. Prediction of air quality under given emission conditions is needed to check whether the actual concentrations of PM2.5 & PM10, SO2 and NOx shall not be exceeding the Ambient Air Quality Standards prescribed by CPCB. E.1. Plausibility approach using Gaussian Plume Model ( GPM )

Prediction of pollutant concentrations can be made by suitable air quality model. Application of such model require in addition to emission data, proper meteorological data ie. Simultaneous wind speed, direction and cloudiness data

Under such condition it is possible to use plausibility approach model to obtain maximum possible impact from the unit. This impact level can be used in the design and also for setting operating limits.

Input parameters are so chosen by taking into consideration their plausibility of occurrence such that the model gives the maximum impact.

Steps : a. Determination of critical wind speed – Wind speed affects the GLC in two ways in the model, one directly and other through plume rise. One hour average GLC values are determined for standard distances ( 100 m.to 20 km ), for six stability classes ( A- F ).

From these values Critical wind speeds for each stability classes are determined which gives maximum concentration value for that wind speed.

b. Use of critical wind speeds to determination of max. GLC- Based on the maximum one hour GLC values estimated with these critical wind speed for six stability classes and selecting worst condition, ie. assuming plausibility of occurrence of different stability conditions in hours, during day time and night time, 24 hour average values are worked out. c. This value represents the maximum under worst condition which shall not exceed at

any time.

E.2. One hour average Centre line GLC of pollutant :

Gaussian Plume Model : ( GPM ) For determining one hour average concentration values Gaussian Plume Model (GPM ) is used.

The model is based on four basic assumptions:

The solution is time variant;

Wind speed is not a function of position;

Diffusivities are not a function of position

Diffusion in downwind direction is insignificant;

Despite these assumptions GPM is still a workhorse for dispersion calculations.

One hour average pollutant concentration [ Centre line ground level ] = C x, 0, 0 C x, 0, 0 = [ Q / ( Π x SY x SZ x UH ) ] * [ Exp (– H2 / 2 x SZ2 ]

where Q = Emission Rate of Pollutant in μg / sec UH = Ave. wind speed in m / sec at H SY = Standard Deviation of plume conc. in Horizontal direction in m. SZ = Standard Deviation of plume conc. in Vertical direction in m H = Effective Stack Height in m. = h + ∆ h. h = Physical stack height in m. ∆ h = Plume Rise in m.

E.3. Plume Rise :

The flue gas pressure for boiler is low and flue gas velocity is also low, hence the plume rise

for the stack of 8 TPH boiler and 6 Lakh Kcal/hr boiler stack are negligible. Hence not

considered for model.

E.4. Averaging time correction :

Averaging time correction factor for converting one hour concentration to 24 hour = 0.40

24 hr average = [ Sum of one Hr ave. concentration / 24 ] x 0.4

E.5. Max. Emission values taken for application of Air Quality Model:

Pollutant 8 TPH boiler With Indian

coal

Thermo Pack-6 Lac Kcal /hr

8 TPH boiler stand by

Thermo Pack-4 Lac Kcal/hr -2 no. stand by

PM10 0.247TPD

0.002 TPD Negligible Negligible

PM2.5 0.296 TPD

0.0024 TPD Negligible Negligible

SO2 0.65 TPD 0.02 TPD 0.41 TPD 0.16 TPD

NO2 0.22 TPD 0.01 TPD 0.146TPD 0.08TPD

Pollutant DG set 750 KVA DG set 500 KVA

SO2 0.13 TPD 0.04 TPD

NO2 0.09 TPD 0.028TPD

E.6. Factory receptor points and Villages within 10 Km. radius:

Sr.No. Receptor Distance from

stack in m.

Direction from

stack

1 Project site 400 N

2 Astami 6500 NW

3 Dhatav 1500 S

4 Kholad 6000 SE

5 Killha 2500 SE

6 Talaghar 2500 SW

7 Warse 3500 W

8 Udadvane 1500 NW

E.7 Wind Rose Diagram:

E.8. Wind Data : From the met data obtained for three months prominent occurrence wind speed &

prominent direction is deduced and given in the below tables.

Percentage of time wind speed and direction occurrence.

a. During study period ---Frequency of wind in %

Wind Speed

m/s

N NE E SE S SW W NW Total

0.61-2.50 1 1 -- 2 2 4 1 2 13

2.50-4.32 2 2 2 3 5 10 14 6 44

4.32-6.79 5 2 3 1 2 8 15 6 42

6.79-10.50 -- - -- -- -- -- 1 -- 01

Calm 00

Total 8 5 5 6 9 22 31 14 100

F: Prediction of ground level concentration of Air Pollutant—

a. Application of Gaussian Plume model for point source based on the guide lines

given by CPCB in PROBES/70/1997-1998 of CPCB is done to determine the

ground level concentration ( GLC ) of PM10, PM2.5 , SO2 & NO2.

b. Plausibility approach is used to find out maximum pollutant concentration that may

occur at the receptor points.

The results are given in the following tables.

F.1 8 TPH Boiler stack – (Indian coal)

Results of GPM model for incremental concentration of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2 at

Villages within 10 km radius.(With APC & No Plume rise condition)

Sr.No. Receptor PM2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2

1 Project site 16.52 13.79 36.28 12.28

2 Astami 0.93 0.78 2.04 0.69

3 Dhatav 7.27 6.07 15.97 5.40

4 Kholad 1.05 0.87 2.30 0.78

5 Killha 3.68 3.07 8.08 2.23

6 Talaghar 3.68 3.07 8.08 2.23

7 Warse 2.28 1.91 5.02 1.70

8 Udadvane 7.27 6.07 15.97 5.40

(All values in µg/m3)

F2 Thermo Pack -6 Lakh Kcal /hr--

Results of GPM model for incremental concentration of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2 at Villages

within 10 km radius.

(With APC & with no Plume rise condition)

(All values in µg/m3)

Sr.No Receptor PM2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2

1 Project site 0.29 2.40 2.40 1.20

2 Astami 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.03

3 Dhatav 0.07 0.06 0.59 0.29

4 Kholad 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.04

5 Killha 0.03 0.03 0.28 0.14

6 Talaghar 0.03 0.03 0.28 0.035

7 Warse 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.08

8 Udadvane 0.07 0.06 0.59 0.29

F.3. 8 TPH Stand by Boiler F O fired: Results of GPM model for incremental concentration of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2 at Villages

within 10 km radius.(With No APC & No Plume rise condition)

Sr.No Receptor SO2 NO2

1 Project site 40.25 17.54

2 Astami 1.38 0.49

3 Dhatav 12.06 4.29

4 Kholad 1.55 0.55

5 Killha 5.72 2.04

6 Talghar 5.72 2.04

7 Warse 3.47 1.24

8 Udadvane 12.06 4.29

(All values in µg/m3)

F.4. Thermo Pack -4 Lakh Kcal/hr capacity -2 Nos. with FO as Fuel-- Results of GPM model for incremental concentration of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2 at Villages within 10 km radius.(With No APC & No Plume rise condition )

Sr.No Receptor PM2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2

1 Project site 0.06 0.05 19.22 9.64

2 Astami 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.27

3 Dhatav 0.01 0.01 4.70 2.30

4 Kholad 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.30

5 Killha 0.01 0.01 2.23 1.12

6 Talaghar 0.01 0.01 2.23 1.12

7 Warse 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.67

8 Udadvane 0.01 0.01 4.70 2.35

(All values in µg/m3)

F.5. DG Set --750 KVA + 500 KVA capacity Results of GPM model for total incremental concentration of SO2, NO2 at Villages

within 10 km radius due to all the DG sets working

Sr.No. Receptor PM2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2

1 Project site

Negligible

concentration

49.90 34.64

2 Astami 0.67 0.44

3 Dhatav 6.21 4.38

4 Kholad 0.74 0.51

5 Killha 2.83 2.01

6 Talaghar 2.83 2.01

7 Warse 1.67 1.15

8 Udadvane 6.32 4.37

(All values in µg/m3)

G. Conclusion :

Air Environment Status after Implementation of the project after superimposing ambient

air quality values in villages as detailed below will be as follows:

Maximum of Ambient Air Quality values from Three months Air quality Data within 10 km radius [ March 2016, April 2016, May 2016 & June 2016 ]

Sr. NO. [A1] [A2] [A3] [A4] [A5] [A6] [A7] [A8]

Location Project

site Astami Dhatav Kholad Killha Talghar Warse Udadvane

PM

10(µg/m3) 76 51.23 49.53 49.61 48.87 50.26 51.91 49.33

PM2.5

(µg/m3) 37 26.17 26.29 26.64 27.26 26.77 25.10 25.90

SO2

(µg/m3) 16 26.31 23.55 22.52 23.19 21.92 21.15 20.22

NOx

(µg/m3) 29 27.49 26.64 24.29 24.35 24.37 22.10 25.29

8 TPH coal fired Boiler & 6 Lakh Kcal/hr Thermopack----

a. For PM2.5 in µg / Nm3

Receptor Before

Project

Incremental Conc. of Pollutant Total Conc.

of Pollutant

With APC &

no ∆h

8 TPH Coal

Boiler

Thermo Pack-6

Lac Kcal/hr

Project site 37.00 16.52 0.29 53.81

Astami 26.17 0.93 0.01 27.11

Dhatav 26.99 7.27 0.07 34.33

Kholad 26.64 1.05 0.01 27.70

Killha 26.64 3.68 0.03 30.35

Talaghar 26.77 3.68 0.03 30.48

Warse 25.10 2.28 0.02 27.40

Udadavane 25.91 7.27 0.07 33.25

b. For PM10 in µg / Nm3

Receptor Before

Project

Incremental Conc. of Pollutant Total Conc. of

Pollutant

8 TPH Coal Boiler Thermo Pack-6

Lakh/hr

Project site 76.00 13.79 2.40 92.19

Astami 51.23 0.78 0.01 52.02

Dhatav 49.53 6.07 0.06 54.66

Kholad 49.61 0.87 0.01 50.49

Killha 48.87 3.07 0.03 51.97

Talaghar 50.26 3.07 0.03 53.36

Warse 51.91 1.91 0.02 53.84

Udadvane 49.33 6.07 0.06 55.46

For SO2 in µg / Nm3

Receptor Before Project Incremental Conc. of Pollutant Total Conc. of

Pollutant

8 TPH Stand by

Boiler

Thermo Pack-

4Lac kcal /hr

Project site 16.00 40.25 19.22 75.47

Astami 26.31 1.38 0.54 28.23

Dhatav 23.55 12.06 4.70 40.31

Kholad 22.52 1.55 0.61 24.68

Killha 23.19 5.72 2.23 31.14

Talaghar 21.92 5.72 2.23 29.87

Warse 21.15 3.47 1.35 25.97

Udadvane 20.22 12.06 4.70 36.98

For NO2 in µg / Nm3

Receptor Before

Project

Incremental Conc. of Pollutant Total Conc. of

Pollutant

8 TPH Stand by

Boiler

Thermo Pack-4

Lakh/hr

Project site 29.00 17.54 9.64 56.18

Astami 27.49 0.49 0.27 28.25

Dhatav 26.84 4.29 2.30 33.43

Kholad 24.29 0.55 0.30 25.14

Killha 24.35 2.04 1.12 27.51

Talaghar 24.37 2.04 1.12 27.53

Warse 22.10 1.24 0.67 24.01

Udadvane 25.29 4.29 2.35 31.93

From the above estimation of GLC for PM10 , PM2.5 , NO2 & SO2 conc. from the emissions of

the Boilers working or only DG sets working, following conclusion are drawn :

1. Air pollution estimation is done for worst condition with APC working and no plume rise

existing. Total concentration is worked out by adding ambient air quality value with

incremental concentration contributed by proposed working of boilers and DG set.

2. GLC of PM10 for villages in 10 km radius -- From the tables above, it is seen that the

under worst case of absence of plume rise the total concentration of PM10 from the

Plant emission is in the range of 51.05 to 92.19 ug/m3, All these values are less than

the AAQS for PM10 of 100 ug/m3 .

3. GLC of PM2.5 for villages in 10 km radius -- From the tables above, it is seen that the

under worst case of absence of plume rise,the total concentration of PM2.5 from the

Plant emission is in the range of 27.11 to 53.81 ug/m3. All these values are less than the

AAQS for PM2.5 of 60 ug/m3 .

4. GLC of SO2 for villages in 10 km radius -- From the tables above, it is seen that the under

worst case of plume rise is absent the total concentration of SO2 from the Plant emission is

in the range of 23.64 to 75.47 ug/m3 . All these values are less than the AAQS for SO2 of

80 ug/m3 .

5. GLC of NOx for villages in 10 km radius – From the tables above, it is seen that the under

worst case of plume rise is absent the total concentration of NO2 from the Plant emission is

in the range of 24.01 to 56.18 ug/m3 . All these values are less than the AAQS for NO2 of

80 ug/m3 .

6. Air pollution control equipment in the form of multicyclone followed by bag filter with

particulate matter removal efficiency of ≥ 90 % shall be installed to restrict particulate

emissions from coal fired units.

Therefore there shall not be any adverse impact on air environment due to the emissions

from the industry.

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS :( Prescribed by CPCB )

Pollutant Time weighted Average

Concentration in Ambient

Industrial, Rural and Other area

Ecologically Sensitive area

( Notified by Central Government

Sulphur Dioxide SO2 µg/m3 Annual* 50 20

24 Hrs** 80 80

Nitrogen Dioxide NO2 µg/m3

Annual* 40 30

24 Hrs** 80 80

Particulate Matter ( Size less than 10 µ )PM10

Annual* 60 60

24 Hrs** 100 100

Particulate Matter ( Size less than 2.5 µ )PM2.5

Annual* 40 40

24 Hrs** 60 60

Ozone ( O3 ) µg/m3 Annual* 100 100

24 Hrs** 180 180

Lead ( Pb ) µg/m3 Annual* 0.50 0.50

24 Hrs** 1.0 1.0

Annexure- III

List of pollution control equipments w.r.t.

each pollution source

DEEPAK NITRITE LTD

ROHA UNIT

(PLOT NOS : 1-7 AND 26-31, MIDC DHATAV, TAL: ROHA DIST: RAIGAD)

LIST OF POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT

A. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES:

Sr No Equipment Fuel Mitigation Stack height

1. Boiler A Coal Cyclone separator with bag

filter 34 m

2. Boiler B FO Stack as per CPCB recommendation

24.5 m (Common for thermopac)

3. Thermopac Coal Cyclone separator with bag

filter 24.5 m

(Common with Boiler B)

4. Thermopac FO Chimney/Membrane dust

collector 20 m

5. D G set HSD Stack as per CPCB recommendation

4.5 m

6. Nitration Process - Scrubber 8.5 m

B. EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT:

Case -1 : Treatment of High TDS Stream

Case-2 : Treatment of normal effluent

Case-3 : Domestic waste water treatment

Case -1 : Treatment of High TDS Stream

Liquid collected : 38 CMD

Solids separated : 5.7 TPD

Details of Multiple Effect Evaporator equipment for high TDS stream

treatment

Sr. No.

Equipment Qty. Material of Construction

Section – A Equipment Manufactured

1 Condensate Feed Preheater HE-01 1 no. Shell: SS 316L; Tubes : Duplex Steel ; Tube sheet : SS 316

2 Feed preheaters (shell & tube type) PH-1 to 3

3 nos. Shell: SS 316L; Tubes : Duplex Steel ; Tube sheet : SS 316

3 Calendria – 1,2,3 E-01,02,03 (All Forced Circulation)

3 nos. Shell: SS 316L; Tubes : Duplex Steel ; Tube sheet : SS 316

4 Vapor Liquid Separator -1,2,3 VLS-01,02,03

3 nos. SS 316L

5 Vacuum Pump- VP-01with seal water circulation system with Plate type heat exchanger

2 nos. Partial SS 316

6 Thermo compressor – TVR-01 1 no. SS 316L with SS 316L nozzles

7 Flash Tank 1 no. SS 316L

8 Surface Condenser SC-01 1 no. Shell: SS 316L; Tubes : SS 316L, Tube sheet : SS 316L

Section – B Standard Bought out Components for Evaporator

1 Recirculation Pump (Axial Flow) RPE-01,02,03

3 nos. Casing – SS 316; Propeller - Duplex Steel (CD4MCU)

2 Product Pump (Screw)- PP-01 Condensate Pump – CP-01

1 no. 2 no.

Casing – SS 316; Impeller - Duplex Steel (CD4MCU) SS 316

3 Piping Fitting & Valves (Evaporation System)

1 Lot SS 316L

4 Interconnecting Vapor Ducting (Sch. 10s)

1 Lot SS 316L

5 Recirculation Piping (FC Calendria) (Sch. 10s)

1 Lot SS 316L

6 Instruments & Control Panel (Non flame proof)

1 Lot

STANDARD BOUGHT OUT ITEMS FOR EVAPORATOR AND STRIPPER SECTION (B)

1 Feed pump – Stripper FPS-01 1 no. Casing : SS 316 Impeller : Duplex Steel

2 Recirculation Pump - Stripper RPS -01 1 no. Casing : SS 316 Impeller : Duplex Steel

3

Inter connecting Pipes, Fittings & valves within battery limits of the plant (Laying, routing, welding, installation excluded)

- 1 lot SS 316L

4 Interconnected Vapor ducting 1 lot SS 316L

Stripper Section

NO. EQUIPMENT/SERVICES LEGEND/ TAG NO

QTY MOC

FABRICATED EQUIPMENT FOR EVAPORATION AND STRIPPER SECTION (A)

1 Feed Balance Tank –Stripper Section FTS-01 1 no. SS 316L

2 Flash Tank & Packed Column (Packings, Spray Nozzles, Packing Support Plate etc.)

PC-01 1 no. SS 316L and Packed Tower totally in SS 316L

3 Condenser – Stripper SCS-01 1 no.

Shell : SS 316L; Tubes : SS 316L (Seamless); Tube Sheet : SS 316L; Dish end : SS 316L

4 Feed Vaporizer – Shell & Tube Type PHS-01 1 no.

Shell : SS 316L; Tubes : Duplex Steel (Seamless); Tube Sheet : SS 316L ; Dish end : SS 316L

5 Vacuum Pump VP-01 1 no. SS 316 contact parts

STANDARD BOUGHT OUT ITEMS FOR EVAPORATOR AND STRIPPER SECTION (B)

1 Feed pump – Stripper FPS-01 1 no. Casing : SS 316 Impeller : Duplex Steel

2 Recirculation Pump - Stripper RPS -01 1 no. Casing : SS 316 Impeller : Duplex Steel

3

Inter connecting Pipes, Fittings & valves within battery limits of the plant (Laying, routing, welding, installation excluded)

1 lot SS 316L

4 Interconnected Vapor ducting 1 lot SS 316L

5. ATFD 1 SS316

Case-2 : Treatment of normal effluent

Treatment of effluent (Low TDS stream)

Effluent sources : Various processes of manufacture

Effluent Quantity : 243 CMD

Design flow : 400 CMD

List of effluent treatment plant equipment

Sr. No Description

Size / Capacity

Qty. MOC Remarks Required Volume

Existing Volume

Addition

al

Volume

A) Civil Units & M.S Units List

1. Oil & Grease Trap 16 17.38 m3 -- 2 No RCC Existing

2. Equalization tank 50 108.8 m3 -- 2 No RCC Existing

3. Neutralization

Tanks 38 44 m3 2 No RCC Existing

4. Flash Mixer 2 4 m3 1 no RCC Existing

5. Primary Settling

Tank 40 100 m3 -- 1 No RCC Existing

6. 1st stage

Bioreactor 750 800 m3 -- 1 No RCC Existing

7. 1st Stage Clarifier 90 100 m3 18.0 m3 1 No RCC Existing

8. 2nd stage

Bioreactor 150 216 m3 Existing

9. 2nd Stage Clarifier 30 49 m3 Existing

10. Sludge Drying Beds 95 100 m3 -- 1Nos

. RCC Existing

11. Shed for storage of

hazardous solid waste

Suitable Suitable -- 1 No MS-GI Existing

12. Shed for Sludge

Drying Beds

Suitable Suitable -- 1

No. MS-GI Existing

B) MS Fabricated, Mechanical & Bought out Equipment List

1. Coarse Screen

10-15mm openings

-- -- 1 No MS-

Epoxy Existing

2.

Coarse bubble

Diffusers for

equalization Tank

Pipe Grids -- -- 1 Lot PVC Existing

3. Primary Settling Tank

Feed pumps

10.5 m3/hr@

10m head -- --

2

Nos. CI Existing

4.

Alum Dosing tank for

Flash Mixer

500 lit 500 lit

5. Alum dosing tank

for flash mixer 10 HP 10 HP -- 1 No HDPE Existing

6. Flash mixer

Agitator

1.0 HP/

1500 RPM 1 HP --

1

No. SS 316 Existing

7. Air Blower for 1st

Bioreactor 250 cfm 470 cfm -- 1

No. CI Existing

8. Air Blower for 2nd

Bioreactor 250cfm 470cfm 1

No.

9.

Fine Bubble

Diffused Aeration

System For 1st

Stage Bioreactor

. Silicon Existing

10.

Fine Bubble

Diffused Aeration

System For 2st

Stage Bioreactor

11. 1st & 2nd Sludge

recirculation pump 5 HP 5HP __ 1

Nos. Existing

Case : 3 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

Capacity : 35 KLD

Sewage : 31 KLD

List of Equipment

Sr. No.

Description Capacity/ Size MOC Qty.

A) Civil

1 Bar Screen Chamber 0.35 m3 RCC 1 No

2 Oil & Grease Trap 2.5 m3 RCC 1 No.

3 Collection cum Equalization Tank 10 m3 RCC 1 No.

4 Equipment & Pump Foundations Suitable RCC 1 No.

B) Mechanical & Fabricated Equipment Skid

1 Coarse Screen in Bar Screen Chamber 15-20 mm opening MS- Epoxy 1 No

2 Bioreactor Feed (Submersible) Pump 2.0 m3/hr @ 10 meter CI 1 No.

3 Air blower 45 m3/hr @ 4 meter CI 1 No.

4 Coarse Bubble Diffuser 1800 mm Long x 90 mm

Dia. PVC 1 No.

5 Fine bubble diffusers 600 m Long x 65 mm Dia. EPDM 4 No.

6 Bioreactor Tank 12.5 m3

MS- Epoxy coating External

MS-FRP lining Internal

1 No.

7 Secondary Settling Tank (Hopper Bottom)

10.0 m3

MS- Epoxy coating External

MS-FRP lining Internal

1 No

8 Sludge Recirculation Pump 2 m3/hr @ 6 meter CI 1 No.

9 Intermediate Tank 1000 Lit. HDPE 1 No

10 PSF Feed Pump 2.5 m3/hr @ 15 meter CI 1 No.

11 Hypo Dosing Tank 250 Lit. HDPE 1 No

12 Hypo dosing pump 12.5 LPH @ 2 kg / cm2 PP 1 No.

13 Pressure Sand Filter ( PSF ) with sand media

0.5 m Dia. X 1.2 m Ht. MS-Epoxy 1 No

Sr. No.

Description Capacity/ Size MOC Qty.

14 Activated Carbon Filter ( ACF ) with carbon media

0.5 m Dia. X 1.2 m Ht. MS-Epoxy 1 No

C) Optional Items

1 Sludge Dewatering Unit with Filter Cloth

0.5 m3

MS- Epoxy coating External

MS-FRP lining Internal

1 No

2 Filtrate Transfer Pumps 0.5 m3/hr @ 6 meter CI 1 No.

3 Final Treated Water Tank

2000 Lit. HDPE 1 No

D) Store Standby Items

1 Bioreactor Feed (Submersible) Pump 2.5 m3/hr @ 10 meter CI 1 No.

2 Air blower 45 m3/hr @ 4 meter CI 1 No.

3 Hypo dosing pump 12.5 LPH @ 2 kg / cm2 PP 1 No.

4 Sludge Recirculation Pump 2 m3/hr @ 6 meter CI 1 No.

5 PSF Feed & Back wash Pump

2.5 m3/hr @ 15 meter CI 1 No.

E) Instrumentation

1 Pressure Gauges Suitable SS Lot

2 Level switch Suitable SS 2 Nos.

3 Rota meter Suitable Acrylic 2 Nos.

F) Electricals

1 Electrical including MCC, Power Cables, etc.

As per below Notes Suitable Lot

G) Interconnected piping

1 Piping including pipe fittings & valves As per below Notes Suitable Lot

C. SOLID WASTE Non- hazardous waste: Only collection storage and safe disposal.

Sr No NON hazardous waste Quantity

generated Disposal

1 Ash from boiler 2.50 T/day Sale to brick manufacturer.

2 Insulating Material 2 T/A To recycler

3 Glass ware / Broken Discarded Glass 1 T/A To recyclers

4 Non- hazardous industrial waste 2 T/A To recyclers

Hazardous Solid Waste : Only collection storage and safe disposal.

S. No.

Waste Name Category Quantity

MTPA Source Disposal Method

Hazardous Waste

1 Used Spent oil (Kg/M) 5.1 91 Process Sale to Authorized re

processor

2 Spent Chemical / Acid

32.1 836 Process Sale to Authorized re

processor

3 30% HCL - 91 Process Sale to Authorized re

processor

4 Discarded containers/barrels/liner

33.3 25 ETP To CHWTSDF ,Taloja/ Sale

to Authorized party

5 Chemical sludge from waste water treatment

34.3 50 Process To CHWTSDF ,Taloja

6 Spent catalyst 35.2 0.07 Process Send back to Authorized

party

7

Distillation residue from contaminated organic solvents

36.4 28 Process To CHWTSDF ,Taloja

8. MEE Salts 34.3 1778 MEE To CHWTSDF ,Taloja/sale

D. NOISE CONTROL DEVICES:

All D G sets provided with acoustic enclosure

Separate acoustic room provided to operators in ammonia compressor section.

Annexure-IV

Commitment to not store locally available

raw materials more Than 3 days.

Annexure-V

An ESR plan for 5 years @ 5 % of the project cost with the consultation of nearby

villagers.

Budgetary Commitment of ESR (With reference to 23rd EAC MOM; PP has to spend 5% of

project cost in 5 years of span. The project cost is 38.68 Crs. Hence PP has to spend about

1.95 Crs. in five years of span)

Sr. No. Description Years

1 2 3 4 5

1

Provision of mobile ambulance with basic medical facilities for the benefit of villagers

07 07 07 07 07

2 Mobile libraries 04 04 04 04 04

3 Construction of farm pond

02 02 02 02 02

4 School health camps 10 10 10 10 10

5 Rain Water Harvesting system with filtration plan

07 07 07 07 07

6 Provision of solar power system

9 9 9 9 9

Total (in lacs) 39 39 39 39 39

Yearly Budget for the CSR activities

Sr. No

CSR Activities proposed

Budget in Rs.

1 Provision of mobile ambulance with basic medical facilities for the benefit of villagers

700000

2 Mobile libraries

400000

3 Construction of farm pond

200000

4 School health camps

1000000

5 Rain Water Harvesting system with filtration plan

700000

6 Provision of solar power system

900000

Total 3900000

Needs Identified

Provision of smokeless chulhas (34% people in Roha and 38% in Taloje use wood as

cooking fuel)

Awareness generation regarding government irrigation schemes (only 12% people

in Roha and 7% in Taloje are aware of any irrigation scheme)

Mobile libraries can initiated for school going and dropouts (64% children

attending school in Roha and 65% in Taloje. Drop out rate at Roha is 17% and 18%

at Taloje)

Grant Activity Chart for MHU activity for the Year 2017 – 2018

S.

No.

Activities Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

1 Regular

OPDs

2 Counseling

Sessions

3 Operational

use of MIS

4 Anemia/HB

Testing

5 School

Health Camp

6 Identification

of

Underweight

Children

7 Blood Group

check up

Camp

8 Eye Check Up

camp

Key Achievements of Mobile Health Unit

S. No. Targets Verification from Means of Verification

1 2000 patients monthly

getting benefits from MHU

Average 1092 patients in OPDs, 460.66

individual counseling and 33.25 in group

counseling are covered on monthly basis

(Total 1585 patients are covered on

monthly basis)

2 Four annual health Camps Total 16 Camps have been held annually

including 10 School Camps, 3 HB + HIV

test camps, 2 health checkup camps and

1 Blood group testing camps

3 Annual 10% increase in

patients

4 Number of Patients referred

to Civil Hospital

5 Total number of patients

accessing MHU

22483 patients covered for OPDs,

individual and group counseling

6 Percentage decrease in

disease load

No MIS for this data

7 At least three visits to each

village

Two visits to each village are ensured

Grant chart for Mobile Library Activity for 2017-2018

S.

No.

Activities Apr May June Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

1 Story

Session

2 Counseling

Session

3 Operational

Use of MIS

4 Monthly

Meeting

5 Story telling

Competition

6 Mid Line

Assessment

Key Achievements of Mobile Library

S. No. Objectives/Expected Out comes Status

1 50% of the primary school children utilize mobile

library facilities

Average monthly

membership is 537 till now

as against 935 school

children

2 80% of regular readers clear the test for reading

& writing in local language

3 60% of children clear aptitude test expected in

age 6 to 15 years

4 Providing a library experience to more than 4500

children across Roha annually

We do not have month wise

membership data till now

but have started it from

January 2016

5 Over 4000 books read/explored over one year

period

Do not have budget for such

a high stock we currently

have 175 books in 3 kits

6 Improving reading levels literacy in the

community

50% of regular readers are

able to improve reading

levels

7 Improving learning for life

Mobile health unit initiated at Roha

OPD Total OPD: 16,729

Awareness generation regarding government irrigation schemes

Pond at Nivi: while plastic lining being done

Nivi Thakurwadi pond lining in progress