Upload
alexandra-reese
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Anguilla
British Overseas Territory
Population: 13,477 (2006 est.)
102 square km
26 km x 5 km
The Purpose of Warning•The goal of public
warning is to reduce the damage and loss of life caused by a natural or human caused hazard event.
•Period!
Components of Warning
Not all Notifications are Warnings!!!Not all Notifications are Warnings!!! There are three types of emergency There are three types of emergency communiqués:communiqués:
Alert – gets their attention (sirens Radio Interrupt etc.Alert – gets their attention (sirens Radio Interrupt etc.Warning – Tells What is wrong, Where and What to doWarning – Tells What is wrong, Where and What to doNotification – Information and ongoing updatesNotification – Information and ongoing updates
Why do we need ANWS Systems?
•Because we are all at risk from natural and human caused hazards everyday
• Call-In First Responders and Emergency Call-In First Responders and Emergency ManagersManagers
• Provide early warning if possibleProvide early warning if possible• Provide on going public information and Provide on going public information and
direction for recoverydirection for recovery• Add a feeling of security (Mitigate Panic!)Add a feeling of security (Mitigate Panic!)• Show accountability to the needs of residents Show accountability to the needs of residents
and visitors by acknowledging riskand visitors by acknowledging risk
Hurricane Luis 1995Before and After
Source: UNESCO CSI
Flooding - Hurricane Lenny
Source: Enrick Harrigan
Responsibilities of ANWS Systems
• If you Have IT, you MUST use it!!!
• You have publicly accepted that the population is at risk
• You must accept it is NEVER perfect
•Why neighbor and not me – U don’t care!
•You woke me up – take me out – I don’t care!
•System failures – redundancy is key!
•Requires Policy and Protocols for Use
•Requestors
•Authorisers
•Activators
• Thresholds of risk and associated alert levels
•Requires consideration for at risk and multi languages
•Requires Multi-Point and Multi-Media
•Requires Weekly and Monthly Testing
•Requires Buy-In from all sectors and the public
•Needs to be integrated in day to day life
Requirements of ANWS Systems
POLICY FOR USE OF THE DISASTER ANGUILLA NATIONAL WARNING SYSTEM (ANWS)
POLICY. The purpose of this policy is to establish authority for system administration, control, access, maintenance and use of Disaster Alert, Notification and Warning Systems, hereafter referred to as ANWS.The ANWS should be used to alert households and businesses of imminent or active threats to people and property in their area. In order to earn and preserve the public’s trust, confidence and support, the ANWS will only be intrusively used in emergency incidents that may affect public safety. Only those with proper training and authority to use the system will activate the ANWS.DEFINITIONS. A. ACTIVATOR. Pre-Approved personnel, per this document trained to activate the NWS. Activation will be on behalf of an approved REQUESTOR. B. Active Incident. An active incident is one currently impacting the lives, the property or the safety of the public. C. At Risk. Any person(s) or area of a community whose safety could be directly endangered by an emergency situation or incident. D. AUTHORIZER. Pre-Approved personnel, per this document, identified to give permission for an ACTIVATOR to activate the NWS on behalf of a REQUESTOR. For a list of AUTHORIZERS refer to Procedure 1 Section C or Procedure 2 Section
So What Is This CAP & Why?• <sender>[email protected]</sender> Hormann America, Inc.
• AlertNET Model 3320 CAP-to-WARNING/ALERT Converter/Encoder 27
• <sent>2007-06-13T17:24:33-07:00</sent>
• <status>Test</status>
• <msgType>Alert</msgType>
• <category>Safety</category>
• <event>Weekly Test</event>
• <urgency>Immediate</urgency>
• <severity>Unknown</severity>
• <certainty>Observed</certainty>
• <expires>2007-06-13T18:54:33-07:00</expires>
• <senderName>CapOriginator1</senderName>
• <headline>This is a weekly test</headline>
• <description> This is a weekly test only</description>
• <instruction> plWARNING/ALERTe disregard </instruction>
• <contact>In case of emergency, listen to Radio and TV for further instructions</contact>
• <areaDesc>ANGUILLA ZONE 1</areaDesc>
• <geocode> Geographic coordinates for polygon of area affected’ lat long
Effective PublicWarnings
and the Common Alerting Protocol
(CAP)
Standards for Public Warning – Mexico City, 2006
Save lives
Reduce losses
Alleviate fear
The measure of a warning is the change in action and attitude that results.
Goals of Public Warning
Reach everyone at risk, wherever, whenever, doing whatever
Don’t raise irrelevant alarms
Easy to use
Reliable and secure
Deliver effective warning messages
Effective Warning Systems
Accurate and specific
Action oriented
Understandable in terms of:
Languages and special needs
Prior knowledge and experience
Timeframe and instructions
Effective Warning Messages
Most people will not act on the first warning message they receive
Instead, they become vigilant and search for corroboration
Only when persuaded it’s not a false alarm will people transform information into action
Corroboration
2000 - “Effective Disaster Warnings” study published
2001 - CAP Working Group and Partnership for Public Warning form;
2002 - CAP draft specification and prototype field trials
2003/4 - OASIS Emergency Management Technical Committee CAP 1.0 adopted, international implementations begin
CAP Timeline
Multiple systems
Multiple purposes
Multiple operators
Historically...
Single originator must activate each system individually
Today’s reality...
One activation triggers multiple systems
Consistent, complete messages
Inputs from varied technologies – EMS Systems, Gauges, Posting Tools
Using CAP...
Basic information about this message:
Date/Time
Sender
Message Type & Status
Distribution Scope
The Alert Block
Specifics of an event or a threat:
Category and description
Urgency / Severity / Certainty
Timeframes
Recommended action
Supplemental information
The Info Block
Traditional one-dimensional model of “priority” is expanded into a “3D” model that expresses:
Urgency (time)
Severity (impact)
Certainty (probability)
Urgency
Severi
ty
Threat or
Event
x
x
x
Certainty
Certainty
The U/S/C Model
In the U/S/C model
Urgency
Immediate
Responsive action should be taken immediately
Expected Action within next hour
Future Action in near future (typically 6-24 hours)
Past Past, no preparatory action required
Unknown Not known
Describes the time available to prepare:
In the U/S/C model
Severity
Extreme Extraordinary or large-scale threat to life and property
Severe Significant threat to life and property
Moderate Potential threat to life and property
Minor Limited threat to live and property
Unknown Not known
Describes the intensity of impact (if it occurs):
In the U/S/C model
Certainty
Observed Definitely occurred or occurring
Likely Likely, although not certain (p>50%)
Possible Possible but not likely (p<50%)
Unlikely Not expected to occur (p<5%)
Unknown Not known
Describes the issuer’s confidence that the event will occur or has occurred:
The Area Block
Geospatial description may be based on administrative, predicted or observed scope of effects
More precise targeting means fewer irrelevant warnings (“cry wolf”)
CAP Implementation in Anguilla
Phase One included piloting then installing RDS FM Radio receivers and defining the larger system plan.
Phase Two involved installing and integrating the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) network backbone, a web based activation interface, Radio Broadcast interruption, text to voice broadcast, and computer popups, email etc. for Government Internal.
Phase Three will include a public alert registration server that will address non English speaking populations and allow the public to register for all island alert and zoned (targeted) alerts.
Level Description
Actual 0no threat (news, it, tourism, info,
etc)
Actual 1local contained, not expected to
grow, info, reporting
Actual 2A risk to people who are special
needs
Actual 3 Risk to life and health
Levels of Alert
Levels and Expected Actions
Hazmat Actual 3 No yes level 3 behaviour
7 yes ALL GROUPS
Hurricane Actual 3 No yes level 3 behaviour
7 yes ALL GROUPS
TSUNAMI Actual 3 yes yes level 3 behaviour
7 yes ALL GROUPS
Missing Person - police
Actual 3 No yes level 3 behaviour
7 yes ALL GROUPS
ANWS Interface to CapCon
BamBox Pop Up
Department of Disaster ManagementDepartment of Disaster Management
Anguilla has entered the 24 hour cone for Hurricane SamAnguilla has entered the 24 hour cone for Hurricane Sam
HURRICANE WARNINGHURRICANE WARNING
Anguilla is being affected by tropical storm force winds.
Please go to the nearest shelter, quickly and bring your shelter kit.
Do not bring alcohol or pets.
Anguilla is being affected by tropical storm force winds.
Please go to the nearest shelter, quickly and bring your shelter kit.
Do not bring alcohol or pets.
FM Interrupt
•Breaks into primary radio broadcast station
•Flashes strobe for 10 seconds (DDM defined)
•Broadcasts the emergency message live, text to speech or as a wav file.
•Existing broadcast infrastructure
•Easy to re establish following a hurricane
•Can be mobile based enhancing redundancy and recovery
Other CAP Applications
Phase 3 Programme Goals
•Complete Legislative Requirements
•Support the UNESCO & CDERA Tsunami Warning Initiatives
•Interface with PDC/UWI auto-notification via CAP
•Continue to evaluate and add CAP Client applications
•Offer best practices to partner countries
•Extend CAP Network through UKOT’s and other partner countries
Stakeholders
Country Stakeholders in all of these activities proposed to include:
•UKOT’s of Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Montserrat, Turks and Cacaos
•NAOT’s of Bonaire, Curacao, St Maarten, Saba, St Eustatia
Regional CAP Network
Redundant Activation Capability
System went Live in Feb 2008Phase 3 begins February 2009(pending funding)
Feel Free to contact us about the CAP Network Concept
Thank you!Government of Anguilla