Upload
alba-decima
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
1/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Wind loading and structural response
Lecture 21 Dr. J.D. Holmes
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
2/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Slender structures (height/width is high)
Mode shape in first mode - non linear
Higher resonant modes may be significant
Cross-wind response significant for circular cross-sections
critical velocity for vortex shedding 5n1b for circular sections10 n1b for square sections
- more frequently occurring wind speeds than for square sections
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
3/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Drag coefficients for tower cross-sections
Cd = 2.2
Cd = 1.2
Cd = 2.0
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
4/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Drag coefficients for tower cross-sections
Cd = 1.5
Cd = 1.4
Cd 0.6 (smooth, high Re)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
5/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Drag coefficients for lattice tower sections
= solidity of one face = area of members total enclosed area
Australian
Standards
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0Solidity Ratio
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
Drag
coefficient
CD (q=0O)
e.g. square cross section with flat-sided members (wind normal to face)
includes interference and shielding effects between members
( will be covered in Lecture 23 )
ASCE 7-02 (Fig. 6.22) :
CD= 425.9 + 4.0
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
6/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Along-wind response - gust response factor
The gust response factors for base b.m. and tip deflection differ -
because of non-linear mode shape
Shear force : Qmax = Q. Gq
Bending moment : Mmax = M. Gm
Deflection : xmax = x. Gx
The gust response factors for b.m. and shear depend on the height
of the load effect, z1 i.e. Gq(z1) and Gm(z1) increase with z1
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
7/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Along-wind response - effective static loads
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Effective pressure (kPa)
Height(
m)
CombinedResonant
Background
Mean
Separate effective static load distributions for mean, background
and resonant components (Lecture 13, Chapter 5)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
8/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Cross-wind response of slender towers
For lattice towers - only excitation mechanism is lateral turbulence
For solid cross-sections, excitation by vortex shedding is usually
dominant (depends on wind speed)
Two models : i) Sinusoidal excitation
ii) Random excitation
Sinusoidal excitation has generally been applied to steel chimneys where
large amplitudes and lock-in can occur- useful for diagnostic check ofpeak amplitudes in codes and standards
Random excitation has generally been applied to R.C. chimneys where
amplitudes of vibration are lower. Accurate values are required for design
purposes. Method needs experimental data at high Reynolds Numbers.
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
9/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Cross-wind response of slender towers
Sinusoidal excitation model :
Assumptions :
sinusoidal cross-wind force variation with time
full correlation of forces over the height
constant amplitude of fluctuating force coefficient
Deterministic model - not random
Sinusoidal excitation leads to sinusoidal response (deflection)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
10/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Cross-wind response of slender towers
Sinusoidal excitation model :
Equation of motion (jth mode):
j(z) is mode shape
)(tQaKaCaG jjjj
Gjis the generalized or effective mass = h
0
2
jdz(z)m(z)
Qj(t) is the generalized or effective force = h
0j dz(z)t)f(z,
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
11/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Sinusoidal excitation model
Representing the applied force Qj(t) as a sinusoidal function of time, an
expression for the peak deflection at the top of the structure can be derived :
(see Section 11.5.1 in book)
h
0
2
j
2
h
0j
2
jj
2
h
0j
2
amax
dz(z)StSc4
dz(z)C
StG16
dz(z)bC
b
(h)y
where j is the critical damping ratio for the jth mode, equal to jj
j
KG
C
2
)(zU
bn
)(zU
bnSt
e
j
e
s
2
a
j
b
m4Sc
(Scruton Number or mass-damping parameter)m = average mass/unit height
Strouhal Number for vortex sheddingze = effective height ( 2h/3)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
12/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Sinusoidal excitation model
This can be simplified to :
For uniform or near-uniform cantilevers, can be taken as 1.5; then k = 1.6
The mode shape j(z) can be taken as (z/h)
2
max
.Sc.St4
k.C
b
y
where k is a parameter depending on mode shape
h
0
2
j
h
0j
dz(z)
dz(z)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
13/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Random excitation model (Vickery/Basu) (Section 11.5.2)Assumes excitation due to vortex shedding is a random process
A = a non dimensional parameter constant for a particular structure (forcing terms)
In its simplest form, peak response can be written as :
Peak response is inversely proportional to the square root of the damping
21
2
2
)]1()4/[(
/
Lao y
yKSc
A
b
y
lock-in behaviour is reproduced by negative aerodynamic damping
yL= limiting amplitude of vibration
Kao = a non dimensional parameter associated with aerodynamic damping
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
14/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Random excitation model (Vickery/Basu)
Three response regimes :
Lock in region - response driven by aerodynamic damping
Lock-in
Regime
Transition
Regime
Forced
vibration
Regime
2 5 10 20
0.10
0.01
0.001
Scruton Number
Maximum tip
deflection /
diameter
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
15/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Scruton Number
The Scruton Number (or mass-damping parameter) appears in peak response
calculated by both the sinusoidal and random excitation models
Sometimes a mass-damping parameter is used = Sc /4 = Ka =
2
ab
m4Sc
2
ab
m
Sc (or Ka) are often used to indicate the propensity to vortex-
induced vibration
Clearly the lower the Sc, the higher the value of ymax / b (either model)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
16/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Scruton Number and steel stacks
Sc (or Ka) is often used to indicate the propensity to vortex-induced
vibration
e.g. for a circular cylinder, Sc > 10 (or Ka > 0.8), usually indicates low
amplitudes of vibration induced by vortex shedding for circular cylinders
American National Standard on Steel Stacks (ASME STS-1-1992) provides
criteria for checking for vortex-induced vibrations, based on Ka
A method based on the random excitation model is also provided in ASME
STS-1-1992 (Appendix 5.C) for calculation of displacements for design
purposes.
Mitigation methods are also discussed : helical strakes, shrouds, additional
damping (mass dampers, fabric pads, hanging chains)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
17/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Helical strakes
For mitigation of vortex-shedding induced vibration :
Eliminates cross-wind vibration, but increases drag coefficient and along-wind
vibration
h/3
h0.1b
b
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
18/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Case study : Macau Tower
Concrete tower 248 metres (814 feet) high
Tapered cylindrical section up to 200 m (656 feet) :
16 m diameter (0 m) to 12 m diameter (200 m)
Pod with restaurant and observation decks
between 200 m and 238m
Steel communications tower 248 to 338 metres (814 to 1109 feet)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
19/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
aeroelastic
model
(1/150)
Case study : Macau Tower
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
20/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Case study : Macau Tower
Combination of wind tunnel and theoreticalmodelling of tower response used
Effective static load distributions distributions of mean, background and resonant wind loads
derived (Lecture 13)
Wind-tunnel test results used to calibratecomputer model
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
21/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Length ratio Lr = 1/150
Density ratio r = 1
Velocity ratio Vr = 1/3
Wind tunnel model scaling :
Case study : Macau Tower
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
22/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Bending stiffness ratio EIr = r Vr2 Lr4
Axial stiffness ratio EAr = r Vr2 Lr
2
Use stepped aluminium alloy spine to model
stiffness of main shaft and legs
Derived ratios to design model :
Case study : Macau Tower
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
23/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5Vm/V240
Full-scaleHeight
(m)
Wind-tunnel
AS1170.2
Macau Building Code
Mean velocity
profile :
Case study : Macau Tower
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
24/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
MACAU TOWER - Turbulence
Intensity Profile
0
50
100
150
200
250300
350
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3Iu
Full-scale
Height(m)
Wind-tunnelAS1170.2Macau Building Code
Turbulence
intensity
profile :
Case study : Macau Tower
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
25/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
MACAU TOWER
0.5% damping
-500
0
500
1000
15002000
0 20 40 60 80 100
Full scale mean wind speed at 250m (m/s)
R.m.s. Mean
Maximum Minimum
Case study : Macau TowerWind tunnel test results - along-wind b.m. (MN.m) at 85.5 m (280 ft.)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
26/31
MACAU TOWER0.5% damping
-2000
-1500-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0 20 40 60 80 100
Full scale mean wind speed at 250m (m/s)
R.m.s. Mean
Maximum Minimum
Towers, chimneys and masts
Case study : Macau TowerWind tunnel test results - cross-wind b.m.(MN.m) at 85.5 m (280 ft.)
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
27/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
Along-wind response was dominant
Cross-wind vortex shedding excitation not strong because
of complex pod geometry near the top Along- and cross-wind have similar fluctuating components
about equal, but total along-wind response includes meancomponent
Case study : Macau Tower
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
28/31
Towers, chimneys and masts
At each level on the structure define equivalent wind loadsfor :
mean wind pressure
background (quasi-static) fluctuating wind pressure
resonant (inertial) loads
These components all have different distributions
Computer model calibrated against wind-tunnel results
Combine three components of load distributions forbending moments at various levels on tower
Case study : Macau Tower
Along wind response :
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
29/31
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
30/31
Case study : Macau TowerDesign graphs
Macau Tower Effective static loads
(s=0 m)
U mean= 59 7m/s; 5% damping
0
50
100
150
200
250
300350
0 100 200
Load (kN/m)
Height(m)
Mean
Background
Resonant
Combined
Towers, chimneys and masts
7/31/2019 Analisis de vibraciones en estructuras cilindricas.ppt
31/31
End of Lecture 21
John Holmes225-405-3789 [email protected]