16
An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C. Gilmour Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Edgewater, MD 21032 Robert P. Mason Dept. Marine Sciences University of Connecticut Groton, CT 06340 Andrew Heyes Chesapeake Biological Laboratory University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science Solomons, MD, 20688 Mark Castro Appalachian Laboratory University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science Frostburg, MD 21532

An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and

Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs

Draft Final ReportJune, 2006

Cynthia C. Gilmour Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewater, MD 21032

Robert P. Mason Dept. Marine Sciences University of ConnecticutGroton, CT 06340

Andrew Heyes Chesapeake Biological LaboratoryUniversity of Maryland, Center for Environmental ScienceSolomons, MD, 20688

Mark CastroAppalachian Laboratory University of Maryland, Center for Environmental ScienceFrostburg, MD 21532

Page 2: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C
Page 3: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Laria

t

StM

arys

Lake

Tuc

kaho

e

Clo

pper

Duc

kett

Libe

rty

Loch

Rav

en

Pin

eyR

unLa

ke

Pre

ttyB

oy

Tria

delp

hia

Pin

eyF

rost

burg

Roc

kyG

ap

Dee

pCre

ek

Sav

age

Hg

in la

rgem

outh

bas

s,

g/kg

0

200

400

600

800

1000Coastal

Plain

Piedmont

Ridge &Valley

AppalachianPlateau

Mercury concentrations in largemouth bass in Maryland reservoirs, size-normalized to a 370 mm fish (data from Gilmour et al. “An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs” MD DNR in review).

What drives the differences in MeHg in fish among Maryland reservoirs?What can be done to limit MeHg bioaccumulation in Maryland?

EPA’s Ambient Water Quality Criterion (AWQC) for Hg in fish tissue is 235 ug/kg

Page 4: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Parameters used to examine controls on Hg in Maryland fish

Factors that affect Hg deposition and transport: Watershed sizeWatershed:lake areaLandusePhysiographic provinceReservoir capacityHydraulic residence timeWater chemistrySediment

Factors that affect net methylation:Water chemistry

Hg, pH, sulfate, DOC, conductivity, DO, TSS, nutrients

Sediment chemistryPore waters: Hg, pH, sulfate, sulfide, Fe, Mn, DOC Bulk phase: Hg, density, organic matter, reduced sulfur (AVS/CRS)

Sediment water partitioning

Factors that influence MeHg bioaccumulation: Water chemistry

MeHg, pH, DOC, TSS, nutrients

Deposition

Transport

Watershed retention

Deposition

Methylation

Bioaccumulation

Page 5: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Statistical Analysis

Three separate models:• Factors that affect Hg deposition and transport:

– Dependant variable: Hg in water and sediments

• Factors that affect net methylation:– Dependant variable: MeHg in water and sediments

• Factors that influence MeHg bioaccumulation: – Dependant variable: BAF (MeHg in Largemouth bass:

MeHg in water)

Stepwise multiple regression

Page 6: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Significant parameters in each model component

Factors that affect Hg deposition and transport: Dependant variable: Hg in water and sedimentsHg deposition (+)Landuse: % developed (+)

Water chemistry: Cl, DOC (+)

Sediment: organic content (+)

Reservoir flow (-), water depth (-)

Factors that affect net methylation:

Dependant variable: MeHg in water and sediments

Water chemistry Hg (+), pH (-), sulfate (+), DO (-)

Sediment chemistryHg (+), sulfide (-), organic matter (+)

Factors that influence MeHg bioaccumulation: Dependant variable: BAF DO (-), pH (+), surface:volume ratio (+)

Deposition

Transport

Watershed retention

Deposition

Methylation

Bioaccumulation

Page 7: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Watershed factors: Hg deposition

Page 8: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

From MD DNR (Sherwell) 2006

Watershed factors: Hg deposition

Page 9: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Laria

t

StM

arys

Lake

Tuc

kaho

e

Clo

pper

Duc

kett

Libe

rty

Loch

Rav

en

Pin

eyR

unLa

ke

Pre

ttyB

oy

Tria

delp

hia

Pin

eyF

rost

burg

Roc

kyG

ap

Dee

pCre

ek

Sav

age

Land

use,

%

0

20

40

60

80

100DevelopedAgricultureForestWetland

Watershed factors: Landuse

Page 10: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

% M

eHg

(filt

ered

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Surface water Bottom water

Lake

Lar

iat

St M

ary'

s La

ke

Tuc

kaho

e

Clo

pper

Duc

kett

Res

.

Libe

rty

Loch

Rav

en

Pin

ey R

un L

ake

Pre

tty B

oy

Tria

delp

hia

Res

.

Pin

ey R

es

Roc

ky G

ap

Dee

p C

reek

Sav

age

% M

eHg

(unf

ilter

ed)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Surface water Bottom water

Coastal Plain

Piedmont

Ridge &Valley

AppalachianPlateau

Methylation: %MeHg as the dependant variable

Varies strongly among reservoirs

Page 11: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Bottom water DO mg/L

0 2 4 6 8 10

% M

eHg

0

20

40

60

80

100

Surface waterBottom water

Controls on methylation: bottom water anoxia

Page 12: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

La

ke L

ari

at

St

Mar

y's

Lake

Tu

cka

hoe

Clo

ppe

r

Du

cke

tt R

es.

Lib

ert

y

Lo

ch R

ave

n

Pin

ey

Run

La

ke

Pre

tty

Bo

y

Tri

adel

phia

Re

s.

Pin

ey

Res

Ro

cky

Ga

p

De

ep

Cre

ek

Sa

vag

e

DO

, m

g/L

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Surface water Bottom water

DO

C,

mg/

L

0

5

10

15

20

25

Surface water Bottom water

Coastal Plain

Piedmont

Ridge &Valley

AppalachianPlateau

Page 13: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Controls on methylation:

pH

Sulfate

pH

5 6 7 8

% M

eHg

in w

ater

col

umn

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0Sulfate

2 4 6 8 10 12 14

% M

eHg

in w

ater

col

umn

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Page 14: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Lake

Lar

iat

St Mar

y's L

ake

Tucka

hoe

Cloppe

r

Ducke

tt Res

.

Liber

ty

Loch

Rav

en

Piney R

un L

ake

Pretty

Boy

Triade

lphia

Res.

Piney R

es

Rocky

Gap

Deep

Creek

Savag

e

pH

4

5

6

7

8

9

10Surface water Bottom water

Coastal Plain

Piedmont Ridge &Valley

AppalachianPlateau

Page 15: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

La

ke L

ari

at

St

Ma

ry's

La

ke

Tu

cka

ho

e

Clo

pp

er

Du

cke

tt R

es.

Lib

ert

y

Lo

ch R

ave

n

Pin

ey

Ru

n L

ake

Pre

tty

Bo

y

Tri

ad

elp

hia

Re

s.

Pin

ey

Re

s

Ro

cky

Ga

p

De

ep

Cre

ek

Sa

vag

e

Sul

fide,

mg/

L

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

Surface water Bottom water

SO

4, m

g/L

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14Surface water Bottom water

Coastal Plain

Piedmont

Ridge &Valley

AppalachianPlateau

Page 16: An Examination of the Factors that Control Methylmercury Production and Bioaccumulation in Maryland Reservoirs Draft Final Report June, 2006 Cynthia C

Significant parameters in each model component

Factors that affect Hg deposition and transport: Dependant variable: Hg in water and sedimentsHg deposition (+)Landuse: % developed (+)

Water chemistry: Cl, DOC (+)

Sediment: organic content (+)

Reservoir flow (-), water depth (-)

Factors that affect net methylation:

Dependant variable: MeHg in water and sediments

Water chemistry Hg (+), pH (-), sulfate (+), DO (-)

Sediment chemistryHg (+), sulfide (-), organic matter (+)

Factors that influence MeHg bioaccumulation: Dependant variable: BAF DO (-), pH (+), surface:volume ratio (+)

Deposition

Transport

Watershed retention

Deposition

Methylation

Bioaccumulation