32
Always Clarify

Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Always Clarify

Page 2: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Session Two-Part Two

– 3 Readings

– 3.1 Two contrasting world views

– 3.1.1 Christian approaches

– 3.2 Robert Orr’s method

– 3.3 Common secular approaches

– 3.4 Bioethics: a tragic view

Page 3: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.1 Two contrasting worldviews

– Judeo-Christianity

– Darwinian Naturalism

Page 4: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Image of God

• Genesis 1:27 27 God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

• 2 Peter 1:4 For by these He has granted to us His precious and magnificent promises, so that by them you may become partakers of the divine nature,

Page 5: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Image of God-Substantive

Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became living soul.

Moral Subject: “I”Moral Subject: “I”Moral Subject: “I”

human elements expressing imago Dei

corporeal

psychofactual

spiritual

Page 6: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Pre-Conscious

• Naïve state prior to stimulus challenge

Pre-conscious Innate DispositionPrePre--conscious Innate Dispositionconscious Innate Disposition

pre-consciousness

Page 7: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Sub-conscious

• Sense or unarticulable feeling

Sub-conscious emergent feelingSubSub--conscious conscious

emergent feelingemergent feeling

sub-consciousness

pre-consciousness

Page 8: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Image of God- Conscious

• Conscious state

Consciousemergent reflection

ConsciousConsciousemergent reflectionemergent reflection

sub-consciousness

pre-consciousness

consciousness

Page 9: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Image of God-Relational & Functional- Gen. 1:28-31

Moral living: “To be”Moral living: “To be”Moral living: “To be”

I Thouhuman

act

God

Page 10: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Sanctity and Quality of Life

• Absolute Sanctity of Life

• Qualified Sanctity of Life

• Transcendental Sanctity of Life

• Pure Quality of Life

“Saying the Unsaid: Voicing Quality of Life Criteria in a Sanctity of Life Position," in The Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. (March 1996) v. 39/1, pp. 103-122

Page 11: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

tSOL/QoL Criteria

• Imminent Death

• Irreparable Condition

• Irreversible Condition

Page 12: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

tSOL& a Theology of Martyrdom

• Philippians 1:21 For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain.

• Philippians 1:23-24 But I am hard-pressed from both directions, having the desire to depart and be with Christ, for that is very much better; yet to remain on in the flesh is more necessary for your sake.

• Romans 14:8 for if we live, we live for the Lord, or if we die, we die for the Lord; therefore whether we live or die, we are the Lord's.

Page 13: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

The Fall

• Genesis 2:9 Out of the ground the LORD God caused to grow every tree that is pleasing to the sight and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

• Genesis 3:5 "For God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."

Page 14: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

(Father/Logos/Spirit)(Father/Logos/Spirit)YHWHYHWH

other

(Essence, Noumena, Thing-in-(Essence, Noumena, Thing-in-Itself)Itself)

Kingdom of the Knowledge of Good and Evil

Object/Phenomena/Appearance (Structure of Sin)

Kingdom of Life

Horizon of YHWH

Truth & Illusion

Heilsgeschichte

Aeveternity

Fact & Symbol

Age of ages

Spiritual Illumination

SpiritualEx-ist-ance

Futurity-Temporal

Communal Spiritual Narrative

Futurity-Eternal

I in Incarnational Community of Contrast

Kairos

Page 15: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

The Good God Question

• Job 38:1-2 Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind and said, 2 "Who is this that darkens counsel By words without knowledge?

• Job 42:3 'Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?' "Therefore I have declared that which I did not understand, Things too wonderful for me, which I did not know."

Page 16: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.1.1 Christian Approaches

– Roman Catholic based principlism1

– Judeo-Christian Hippocratic ethics

– Christian Virtue Ethics

1Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services Fifth Edition. United

States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Issued by USCCB, November 17, 2009

Page 17: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.2 Robert Orr’s Method• Framing the medico-ethics question

• Four elements for medical clarification

• Clarifying decision making agency

• Clarifying institutional level issues

• Operative norms and values

• Discussion

• Recommendations

• Follow-up

• Comments

Page 18: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.2.1 Framing the Medico-ethics Question

Page 19: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.2.2 Four elements for medical clarification

• Patient History

• Diagnosis

• Prognosis

• Treatment plan

Page 20: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.2.3 Clarifying decision making agency

• Patient capacity

• Legal competency

• Surrogate agency

Page 21: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.2.4 Clarifying institutional level issues

• Distinctives in policy and procedure

• Legal implications

Page 22: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.2.5 Operative norms and values

• Primary agents

• Mitigating agents

Page 23: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.2.6 Discussion

Page 24: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.2.7 Recommendations

Page 25: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.2.8 Follow-up and Comments

Page 26: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

3.3 Darwinian Naturalism

• Principlism

• Social Contract

Page 27: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Variation on Principlism

• Medical indication (medical norms)

• Patient Preference (autonomy)

• Quality of life (Beneficence/non maleficence)

• Contextual features (includes justice)

Albert Jonson: Clinical Ethics

Page 28: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Social Contract

• Contracts made with voluntarily consent to receive or give up benefits and burdens to its members, health care institutions and health care distributions must conform to the dictates of agree upon principles

• Equitable distribution of health care should be conceived in terms of justice

• Done under the ‘veil of ignorance’

• Mini/max principle

Page 29: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

The proper way to think abut health-care spending is tofocus on the NET SOCIAL VALUE ADDED by health care,defined as:

Net social Added by = Health System

Gross Value Added by - Health Care to Patients

The Opportunity Costs of that Care for Society

Among these opportunity costs are:• education of our young• basic science R&D• nation’s public infra-structure• national security and defense

David B. Reuben: Portland Providence Medical Center Grand Rounds Providence Nov. 16, 2011

Page 30: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

A Matrix for Ethical DecisionMaking in a Pandemic

Dr. John Tuohey

An Example of Applied Synthesis of Principlism and Social Contract

Page 31: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Ethics Exercise

• Interactive Exercise

• Orr’s Method

Page 32: Always Clarify. Session Two-Part Two –3 Readings –3.1 Two contrasting world views –3.1.1 Christian approaches –3.2 Robert Orr’s method –3.3 Common secular

Clinical Ethicist Interview

• How did you prepare to be a clinical ethicist?

• What is the policy and procedure for a clinical ethics consult?

• How do you approach conflict?

• Is there ever a place is their for a local spiritual counselor in a clinical ethics consult?

• How would you counsel me to respond if I were called to be involved in a case?