Bolivia's Neoliberal LabyrinthImpasse in Bolivia: Neoliberal Hegemony and Popular Resistance by Benjamin Kohl; LindaFarthingReview by: Jeffery R. WebberLatin American Perspectives, Vol. 34, No. 6, Aggressive Capital and Democratic Resistance(Nov., 2007), pp. 162-164Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27648066 .

Accessed: 13/06/2014 09:03

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

.

Sage Publications, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Latin AmericanPerspectives.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.223 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:03:06 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Book Review

Bolivia's Neoliberal Labyrinth

by Jeffery R. Webber

Benjamin Kohl and Linda Farthing Impasse in Bolivia: Neoliberal Hegemony and Popular Resistance. London and New York: Zed Books, 2006.

In Impasse in Bolivia, Benjamin Kohl and Linda Farthing examine neoliberal economic

restructuring and the popular resistance it generated in Bolivia. They offer what is

undoubtedly the most thorough and devastating critique available in English of neoliberalism as it unfolded in that country. For this reason and others it will be

required reading for students and scholars of Bolivia, Latin America, political economy, and development more generally.

Kohl and Farthing argue that on the international scale a "global hegemonic neoliberal

regime" has been constructed mainly through international financial institutions,

private investors, and (especially in Latin America) the U.S. state. The long-term viability of this international regime, however, is called into question by the fact that "even

though national governments have largely been unable to imagine alternatives to the onerous conditions laid down by international financial institutions (IFIs) and private investors, the sacrifices neoliberalism demands from the poor majorities of the global South increasingly propel them to rebel against its premises and policies" (12). Southern

states, therefore, cannot always guarantee the necessary political stability to allow

neoliberal markets to flourish.

Among the great contributions of Impasse in Bolivia are the authors' discussion of how neoliberalism from above interacts with resistance from below and their emphasis on the complexities of the neoliberal project at both the international and the nation-state level. Kohl and Farthing show that in the first stage of restructuring, between 1985 and

1993, the Bolivian government employed a complex combination of consent and coercion in its dealings with the popular classes in order to implement the radical neoliberal content of its New Economic Policy. Pressures from the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the United States were especially intense. Other

ingredients of the success of the neoliberal assault were the deliberate, near-total

destruction of the Bolivian Workers' Confederation and the economic cushions provided to dislocated and unemployed workers by the growing informal economy, migration to Argentina, and the emergent coca-cocaine sector. Despite the fact that 20,000 miners

lost their jobs, along with 35,000 workers in the manufacturing sector, in the first year of economic restructuring and income distribution worsened, the international financial

institutions heralded Bolivia as a success story for having stabilized the economy, increased exports, tamed inflation, and increased gross national product (GNP) per capita during the late 1980s and early 1990s.

The authors also provide an incisive account of "capitalization," or privatization

Bolivian-style, under Gonzalo S?nchez de Lozada's first presidential administration from 1993 to 1997. S?nchez de Lozada promised that his privatization package would "attract international investors to Bolivia, fuel economic growth, and create hundreds

Jeffery R. Webber is a Ph.D. candidate in political science at the University of Toronto. He thanks

Susan Spronk and Heather Williams for comments on an earlier draft of this review.

LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES, Issue 157, Vol. 34 No. 6, November 2007 162-164 DOI: 10.1177/0094582X07308277 ? 2007 Latin American Perspectives

162

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.223 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:03:06 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

BOOK REVIEW 163

of thousands of jobs77 (102). The outcome was rather different. The informal sector continued to be the primary survival tool of poor Bolivians searching to eke out a basic livelihood, privatized state enterprises laid off workers, and the economic growth and new jobs never materialized. Between 1999 and 2004 gross domestic product (GDP) rates bottomed out at 1 percent and hit a ceiling of only 3.5 (113). Corruption, far from

being eliminated through the privatization of state-owned enterprises, reached new

heights. Kohl and Farthing document asset-stripping in the privatized railroad and airline sectors, widespread transferring of profits in the privatized telecommunica tions sector, and selling of the hydrocarbons industry at massively discounted prices. Also illustrated are the steep revenue losses stemming from the privatization of previously profitable state enterprises, particularly in the hydrocarbons and telecommunications sectors. Impasse in Bolivia is an informed and well-documented indictment of the neoliberal experiment in Bolivia, with lessons for the global South more generally.

The authors' discussion of resistance is, however, significantly less compelling. First, Impasse in Bolivia does not convey the revolutionary potential of the 2000-2005 cycle of

popular contention that overthrew two neoliberal presidents (Hylton and Thomson, 2005; Webber, 2005). Rather, the new movements at the heart of the insurrectionary

wave are juxtaposed against the workers' movement earlier in the twentieth century,

led by the powerful and centralized Bolivian Workers7 Confederation, and described as ad hoc and relatively spontaneous. In fact, however, the radically transformative

potential in the various sectors and regions of the country that constituted the 2000-2005

protest cycle was real and predicated on a vast web of preexisting social-movement

networks (Yashar, 2005), including the peasant trade-union federation in the case of the Aymara peasantry, the coca growers7 peasant unions in the case of peasant resistance in the Chapare region, the Regional Workers7 Central of El Alto, and El

Alto's slum-based neighborhood federation.

Second, the indigenous liberationist component of the latest wave of protest is not

sufficiently developed with regard to its organizational bases, its ideological currents, and its political aims. Third, and most serious, when discussing the "limitations of national resistance in a global market77 Kohl and Farthing are, at times, almost fatalistic

in their pessimism, elaborating at length on the "costs77 of protest and social unrest for "national development77 (191-192). The costs associated with capitulating to capital, so

clearly elucidated earlier in the book, seem often to fade from view when the authors reflect on strategies of resistance. Too stark an opposition is depicted between the

possibilities of anti-neoliberal resistance in the poorest country in South America and international levels of resistance in "global civil society.77 Possible synergies of simul taneous resistance at all levels are therefore underestimated. Regional dynamics of

resistance within Latin America as a whole are conspicuously absent from the discus

sion, as is the ongoing importance of contesting territorially based state power on the

part of popular struggles in the current epoch of neoliberal capitalism. The authors

present an ambiguous, underdeveloped praxis based on the idea that a "strong global civil society capable of re-embedding the economy into social life needs to flourish77 in order for national-level resistance in countries like Bolivia to succeed. What would

such a civil society look like? Rather than confronting capitalism, and not simply its neoliberal form, the authors

seem implicitly to adopt an increasingly popular reading of Polanyi in which the

capitalist market can be "reembedded77 in society with more humane results for global humanity. A number of powerful critiques of this perspective have emerged in recent

years, with far more compelling, revolutionary, and, to my mind, realistic strategies of

anticapitalist resistance (Saul, 2005; Hart-Landsberg and Burkett, 2005; McNally, 2002; IIRE, 2006; Petras and Veltmeyer, 2005).

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.223 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:03:06 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

164 LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES

REFERENCES

Hart-Landsberg, Martin and Paul Burkett

2005 China and Socialism: Market Reforms and Class Struggle. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Hylton, Forrest and Sinclair Thomson

2005 'The chequered rainbow." New Left Review 35: 40-64.

IIRE (International Institute for Research and Education) 2006 Change the World Without Taking Power? or Take Power to Change the World? Amsterdam:

International Institute for Research and Education.

McNally, David

2002 Another World is Possible: Globalization and Anti-Capitalism. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring Publishers.

Petras, James and Henry Veltmeyer 2005 Social Movements and State Power: Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador. London: Pluto Press.

Saul, John S.

2005 The Next Liberation Struggle: Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy in Southern Africa. New

York: Monthly Review Press.

Webber, Jeffery R.

2005 "Left-indigenous struggles in Bolivia: Searching for revolutionary democracy." Monthly Review 57: 34-48.

Yashar, Deborah J. 2005 Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal

Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.223 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:03:06 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions