AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    1/42

    Social Network AnalysisExamining the Role of Network Ties in Supporting KnowledgeManagement

    Jennifer MaddrellAECT 2009 - Louisville, KY - October 29, 2009

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    2/42

    Purpose

    Review of Sociology Literature What can be learned about knowledgenetworks from social network analysis

    theory and research?

    Influence of Network Ties

    Heuristics and Questions from

    Research Network Examples

    Networked Professional Development

    Networked Classroom

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    3/42

    Social Network AnalysisResearchers

    Thomson Reuters

    ISI Web of KnowledgeDatabase

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    4/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    5/42

    Citations to Granovetter

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    6/42

    86% of Citations to 2 Papers

    Granovetter, M. S. (1973). TheStrength of Weak Ties. The

    American Journal of Sociology,

    78(6), 1360-1380.

    Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic

    action and social structure: Theproblem of embeddedness.

    American Journal of Sociology,

    91(3), 481-510.

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    7/42

    Granovetter Social NetworkAnalysis

    Suggested as way to bridge micro andmacro levels of sociological theory

    Micro: small groups

    Macro: diffusion, mobility, communityorganization

    Focuses on:

    Strength of interpersonal ties Impact of ties on macro level issues

    Theory and research on social structurebeyond the primary group and on

    relationships between groups

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    8/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    9/42

    Strong and WeakInterpersonal Ties

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    10/42

    Influence of Network Ties

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    11/42

    Diffusion

    Assumptions

    All bridges are weak ties

    New information spreads through

    weak ties

    Implications

    Those without weak ties lack new

    messages However transmission through

    indirect ties can become distortedand prone to misunderstanding

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    12/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    13/42

    Bridging Value

    Assumptions

    Weak ties are valuable as theyfacilitate connections to other

    networksTends to hold true for higher rather

    than lower socioeconomic groups

    Implications Weak ties offer mobility through new

    connections

    Theory refined to suggest the value of

    each bridge not equivalent

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    14/42

    Network Norms

    Assumptions

    Dense networks have a highproportion of interconnections

    Network density plays a role inestablishing norms

    Implications

    Norms will likely to form in densenetworks more

    Large groups less able to set andenforce norms

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    15/42

    Collective Action

    Assumptions Cost of membership = network

    participation

    Interdependence fostered when onepersons participation depends uponthe participation of another

    Implications Discourages support for lurkers in the

    network

    Reciprocal obligations fuel collectiveaction

    Coordination of contributions within

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    16/42

    Questions for FutureResearch

    What are the characteristics of weaktie bridges that make somesuccessful and others less

    successful? How does network content,

    governance and structure emerge

    and develop over time? What is the potential for interplay

    between dense networks ofstrong

    ties and weak tie bridges?

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    17/42

    Heuristics

    Identify and utilize weak tieconnections to spur innovation andmessage diffusion

    Support inter-unit bridges Span structural holes for strategic

    advantage

    Promote interdependence among strongtie clusters

    Support relationships among denselyclustered strong tie relationshipsthrough coordination of

    contributions

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    18/42

    Some examples

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    19/42

    Networked ProfessionalDevelopment

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    20/42

    The EdTechTalk.comWebcasts

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    21/42

    Networked Connections

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    22/42

    Ties to other Networks

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    23/42

    How are connections

    facilitated?

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    24/42

    In the beginning

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    25/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    26/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    27/42

    Twitter Research Questions

    What are the experiences ofparticipants in a twitter.com sub-network?

    What is the nature of thecommunication and interaction?

    What are users' perceptions about theinteraction and communication?

    Why do users participate? How do users represent themselves?

    What are the demographic

    characteristics?

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    28/42

    Networked Classroom

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    29/42

    Interaction

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    30/42

    The Networked Classroom

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    31/42

    http://eci831.wikispaces.com

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    32/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    33/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    34/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    35/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    36/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    37/42

    What We Observed

    N P f T l

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    38/42

    No Perfect Tool orTechnology

    h // b d /i 692

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    39/42

    http://open.byu.edu/ipt692r-wiley

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    40/42

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    41/42

    Other examples?

  • 8/14/2019 AECT 2009 Social Network 20091029 FINAL

    42/42

    Presentation and Paper at:

    http://DesignedToInspire.com/drupal/aect2

    http://designedtoinspire.com/drupal/aect2009http://designedtoinspire.com/drupal/aect2009