20
Research Driven Decision Making for Advanced Learning Technology Integration Nada Dabbagh Susan Dass AECT 2012, Louisville, KY

Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Research Driven Decision Making for Advanced Learning Technology

Integration

Nada DabbaghSusan Dass

AECT 2012, Louisville, KY

Page 2: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

AgendaIntroduction

• Background

• Immersion Program

Theoretical Framework

• ILDF

Application of ILDF Framework

• Exploration Phase

• Enactment Phase

• Evaluation Phase

LATIST Demo

Educational Implications

Page 3: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Background

Project Goal:

• Examine current DAU training programs and learning products to identify processes and methods for utilizing advanced learning technologies (ALT) within DAU learning modalities.

Page 4: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

AT&L Performance Learning Model

Page 5: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Immersion Program

http://immersion.gmu.edu

http://immersion09.onmason.com/

Page 6: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Instructional Design Methodology

Integrative Learning Design Framework (ILDF) (Dabbagh & Bannan-Ritland, 2005)

Page 7: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Application of ILDF Framework

Page 8: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Exploration Phase Methods

Page 9: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Findings

• DAU relies on multiple roles and responsibilities, internal and external to the organization, to develop learning assets

• DAU uses an IPT (Integrated Product Team) approach to develop learning assets

• DAU does not have a formal process to select and integrate pedagogically appropriate ALT

• DAU does not have a sandbox

Page 10: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Conceptual Model

Page 11: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

LATIST

Learning Asset Technology Integration Support Tool

Page 12: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Enactment Phase Methods

Usage Centered Design

Model TechniquesRole Modeling Scenarios

Use Cases

Task Modeling Task KnowledgeInformation Process

Content Modeling Taxonomies

Page 13: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Electronic Performance Support System

(EPSS)

• On the job• Just in time• Integrated • User control• Selected content

Page 14: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

LATIST Objectives

• Explore what the research says about learning technologies

Explore Research• Examine advantages, disadvantages, and best practices

Select Best Technology• Select instructional strategies and learning technologies based on objectives• Select appropriate technologies for DAU specific factors

Apply Technology

• Access technologies to practice for your learning assets

• View real world examples of technology used in government and other settings

Page 15: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

LATIST Development Team

Bean Creative

Page 16: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Prototype Wireframes

Page 17: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Evaluation Phase Methods

Page 18: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

LATIST Demo

DAU Prototype

http://latist1.gmu.edu

GMU Version

http://latist.gmu.edu

Page 19: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Educational Implications

Customizable Performance Support Tool• Support K-12 teachers looking to accommodate the gamer generation

• Corporate leadership looking to grasp implications of new technologies

• SME trying to find a good technology fit for their content

• Instructional designers wanting to understand the pedagogical affordances of learning technologies

Research Based Tool• Advanced Learning Technologies

• Instructional design principles and processes

Scalable design• Modifiable database

• Updatable content

Next Steps

Page 20: Dabbagh-Dass LATIST AECT-2012

Contact Information

• Nada Dabbagh• [email protected]

• Susan Dass• [email protected]