Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Advise Liaison Workshop
Pont St. Mar+n 24th November 2014
Stefano D’Orilia Project Officer Research Execu+ve Agency (REA) Unit B4 Safeguarding Secure Society
Outline
1. The Research Executive Agency
and H2020
2. Other FP7 related projects
3. Ethics and
societal aspects in H2020
Main REA tasks
• Manage parts of the EU's R&I programmes
7th Framework Programme (FP7), 2007-‐13
Horizon 2020, 2014-‐20
• Common logis>cal and administra>ve services
Evalua@on logis@cs Contrac@ng and paying experts
Par@cipant valida@on
H2020 Helpdesk
§ Policy work remains within the European Commission
Ø this includes the definition of the Work Programmes (call for proposals)
The REA implements certain Work Programmes + provides horizontal services across all programmes:
- evaluation facility, - Validation Services, - central FP7 enquiry service
European Commission vs. REA European Commission vs. REA
The people @ REA: 558 staff (2014)
H2020: overview
REA in Horizon 2020 – 3rd pillar
Result of the first H2020 Call for Proposal (2014)
• Applicants to be informed on 28/01/15
No nego@a@on!
• Grant Agreements to be signed at the end of April 2015
• Project to start tenta>vely in May 2015
H2020 Call for Proposal 2015
• Work Programme already published in December 2013 together with WP 2014
• 25/03/2015 Call opens
• TBC End of March: Informa>on day for coordinators
• 27/08/2015 deadline to submit proposals
H2020 Call for Proposal 2015 – relevant topics Call - Disaster-resilience: safeguarding and securing society (DRS) I. Crisis management DRS-6-2015: Crisis management topic 6: Addressing standardisation opportunities in support of increasing disaster resilience Call – Fight against crime and Terrorism (FCT) I. Forensics FCT-1-2015: Forensics topic 1: Tools and infrastructure for the extraction, fusion, exchange and analysis of big data including cyber-offenses generated data for forensic investigation FCT-2-2015. Forensic topic 2: Advanced easy to use in-situ forensic tools at the scene of crime II. Law enforcement capabilities FCT-9-2015: Law Enforcement capabilities topic 5: Identity Management IV. Ethical/Societal Dimension FCT-15-2015: Ethical/Societal Dimension Topic 3: Better understanding the role of new social media networks and their use for public security purposes FCT-16-2015: Ethical/Societal Dimension Topic 4 - Investigating the role of social, psychological and economic aspects of the processes that lead to organized crime (including cyber related offenses), and terrorist networks and their impact on social cohesion
1. The Research Executive Agency
and H2020
2. Other FP7 related projects
3. Ethics and
societal aspects in H2020
FP7 ac>vi>es and areas
FP7 subarea
Secure communications
InteroperabilityStandardisationCitizens, media and security
Security economicsEthics and justiceERA-‐net
Recovery
Response
Preparedness, prevention, mitigation and planning4. RESTORING
SECURITY AND SAFETY IN CASE OF
CRISIS
5. SECURITY SYSTEMS
INTEGRATION, INTERCONNECTIVITY
AND INTEROPERABILITY
Information management
FP7 activity
7. SECURITY RESEARCH
COORDINATION AND STRUCTURING
Training
End-‐users
Studies
Small and Medium Enterprises
6. SECURITY AND SOCIETY
Organisational requirement for interoperability of public usersForesight, scenarios and security as evolving concept
Response
FP7 activity FP7 subareas
Organised crime
Intelligence against terrorism
Explosives
Ordinary Crime and Forensic
CBRN ProtectionInformation Gathering
Design, planning of buildings and urban areas
Energy, Transport, communication grids
Surveillance
Supply chainCyber crime
Land borders
Sea borders
Air borders
Border checks
Intelligent Border Surveillance
1. Increasing the Security of citizens
3. Intelligent surveillance and
enhancing border security
2. Increasing the Security of
infrastructures and utilities
Activity 1 Increasing the security of the Citizens EU funding: ~ 235 Million €
Total EU contribution: Total for REA : ~122 Million €
Caper Hemolia
Conphirmer
SaveMed
Cocae
Organised crime
Intelligence against terrorism
Explosives
Ordinary crime & Forensics
CBRN protection
Information gathering
2007 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Eksistenz
Indect Raptor
Optix Commonsense Avert Forlab
Tiramisu D-Box
Midas Saliant
Linksch Savelec Meprocs
Smartpro
Evidence
Twobias Bio-
protect
Reward Scintilla Modes-SNM
Sciims Odyssey
Lasie Zonesec
IP CP CSA
EU funding – Total 85.7M€
Activity 5 Security systems integration, interconnectivity and Interoperability
Information Management
Secure Communications
Interoperability DISASTER
ESENET
SIIP
2007 2009 2010 2011 2012
IP CP CSA
Standardisation
2013
IDIRA
BRIDGE ISITEP
CRISP
BEAT
PPDR-TC
ADVISE
SAVASA
C2SENSE
FREESIC
GERYON
HIT-GATE
EPISECC
REDIRNET
SECINCORE
SECTOR
SECRICOM*
EULER*
* Actually funded under activity 2
Activity 7 Security Research coordination and structuring EU funding – Total 58.8 M€
Training
End-Users
Studies
2007 2009 2010 2011 2012
CP CSA
2013
DITAC
VOX-POL
SOURCE
CIPRNET
LEILA
SAFECITI
NoE
NMFRDISASTER
INSEC INNOSEC
ARCHIMEDES
EUROFORGEN-NOE
SEREN2 SEREN
VIDEOSENSE
Other coordination
ESCORTS EU-SEC II
CRESCENDO
SMEs
SECUREPART STRAW
OPERAMAR
SECURECHAINS
OSMOSIS
ROSFEN
MISAFE
3D-FORENSICS
SMARTPREVENT
P-REACT
GRAFFOLUTION
Why clustering?
• Strengthen collaboration among projects
• Mutual benefit: consortia, EU (citizens, taxpayers)
• Increased efficiency
• Possible new partnerships
How collaborating?
• Ad-hoc meeting (e.g. if review meeting) to better know each other’s projects and identify fields of collaboration
• Brussels central meeting: REA premises 1. Consortia 2. DG ENTR + DG HOME? CONNECT? 3. End-users
• How often?
How collaborating?/2
How to ensure an effective collaboration? 1. Common platform? 2. CMS (Google Drive)? 3. Website? 4. Review or relevant meetings/workshops?
• Exchanging deliverables? > at least “Public” ones! Reports?
• Give access to each other Intranet?
• Networking = Other activities = 100% reimbursement
1. The Research Executive Agency
and H2020
2. Other FP7 related projects
3. Ethics and
societal aspects in H2020
All proposals submiLed for funding following a call for proposals are evaluated on their scien>fic merit.
All proposals must describe ethical issues raised & how they will be addressed so as to conform to na>onal, European and interna>onal regula>ons
A proposal may be rejected from funding on ethics grounds.
Ethics in H2020
• Ac@vi@es raising ethical issues must comply with the ‘ethics requirements’ set out in Annex 1.
• Before the beginning of an ac@vity raising an ethical issue, the coordinator must submit to the EU a copy of: (a) any ethics commi`ee opinion required under
na@onal law and (b) any no>fica>on or authorisa>on for ac@vi@es
raising ethical issues required under na>onal law. These documents should be in English, if not -‐ the coordinator
must also submit an English summary.
• The coordinator must submit a declara@on by each beneficiary concerned that all the submiLed documents cover the ac@on tasks.
• If a beneficiary breaches any of its obliga>ons, the grant may be reduced and the Agreement or par@cipa@on of the beneficiary may be terminated.
Ethics in H2020
Each applicant is responsible for:
• iden@fying any poten@al ethical issues • handling ethical aspects of their proposal • detailing how they plan to address them in sufficient
detail already at the proposal stage.
The Ethics part of each proposal (part A in SEP, part B sec@on 6) should include descrip@on of issues and arrangements! hLp://ec.europa.eu/research/par@cipants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/ethics/h2020_hi_ethics-‐self-‐assess_en.pdf
Ethics self-‐assessment
Ethical issues in Security research
Examples & Defini>ons
Data privacy: Data privacy is the right of any individual to expect that his/her personal informa@on directly or indirectly collected are processed securely and are not disseminated without their wri`en consent. Data protec>on: Data protec@on is the framework of security measures designed to guarantee that data are handled in such a manner as to ensure that they are safe from unintended, unwanted or malevolent use. Data protec@on is the technical mechanism to ensure data privacy. Mission/Func>on Creep: is used in the security context for a type of misuse concern, where an experiment, a technology or informa@on/data is used beyond the approved ini@al plan and thereby could harm fundamental ethical values or civil rights (surveillance, people tracking tools etc)
• biometric passports/visas • Systems for facial recogni@on in real-‐@me in an unrestricted
environment • 3D facial recogni@on algorithms • iris and facial recogni@on • video surveillance systems in railways, airport, urban areas,
commercial, retail, banks, parking, traffic control etc. • « smart» systems / technologies • mobile electronic tags • automa@c number plate recogni@on • exposure of volunteers to electro-‐magne@c field tests • research tests that could endanger human safety or breach
fundamental rights • Use of animals / tes@ng
Ethical issues in Security research
Examples of “sensi>ve” research/applica>ons :
Social Science and Humanities aspects "Social sciences and humanities (SSH) research will be fully integrated into each of the general objectives of Horizon 2020"
Horizon 2020 regulation
SSH in Societal Challenges 7 SC7: Cultural and socio-economic aspects of security, risk and management issues (including legal & human rights)
Integra>on of SSH in Horizon 2020
§ Social sciences and humani>es (SSH) are given an enhanced role as a cross-‐cudng issue across Horizon 2020
§ SSH disciplines are invited to address complex societal challenges, which is why contribu>ons from the SSH will oeen appear in interdisciplinary and mul>disciplinary contexts
§ Topics that explicitly take into account the social, economic, behavioural, ins>tu>onal, historical and/or cultural dimensions of a societal challenge are flagged as SSH-‐relevant
§ If your proposals belong to an SSH-‐relevant topic, you should explicitly iden>fy contribu>ons from the SSH
Evaluation criteria
Clarity and pertinence of the objectives Soundness of the concept, including trans-disciplinary considerations, where relevant Extent that proposed work is ambitious, has innovation potential, and is beyond the state of the art (e.g. ground-breaking objectives, novel concepts and approaches) Credibility of the proposed approach
Exce
llenc
e
The expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant topic Enhancing innovation capacity and integration of new knowledge Strengthening the competitiveness and growth of companies by developing innovations meeting the needs of European and global markets; and, where relevant, by delivering such innovations to the markets
Any other environmental and socially important impacts (not already covered above) Effectiveness of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results (including management of IPR), to communicate the project, and to manage research data where relevant
Impa
ct
Research and Innovation Actions/Innovation Actions
Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources Complementarity of the participants within the consortium (when relevant) Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management
Impl
emen
tatio
n
ü Interdisciplinarity and societal aspects are fully integrated
Stefano D’Orilia REA – Research Executive Agency http://ec.europa.eu/research/rea @ stefano.d’[email protected] * COV2 19/120▪ 1049 Brussels ▪ Belgium site 16 Place Rogier ▪ 1210 Brussels ( +32-2-29 54660 7 +32-2-29 79646
Copyright © 2007-2009 Close Comfort
Questions?