18
J. Acoustic Emission, 31 (2013) 1 © 2013 Acoustic Emission Group Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite Structures Markus G. R. Sause University of Augsburg, Institute for Physics, Experimental Physics II, D-86135 Augsburg Abstract Numerical studies were performed to investigate acoustic emission (AE) signal propagation in carbon fiber-reinforced plastic plates with internal damage. For the case of thin plates, Lamb waves are the dominating mode of propagation for ultrasonic waves. The interpretation of Lamb waves is one of the main challenges for valid source localization or identification procedures. Naturally, the lateral size and the thickness of the plate have a significant impact on the propaga- tion behavior of guided waves. While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda- ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused by internal discontinuities are more difficult to understand. During loading of a composite specimen, a variety of damage types can occur, that alter the properties of the composite. Although AE signals originate from the rapid microscopic displacement within the material, the interaction of the excited acoustic waves is not limited to microscopic dimensions. Due to the wavelength of the Lamb waves in the millimeters range, the propagating Lamb-wave modes can interact with discontinuities in these dimensions as well. Typical macroscopic damage modes found in the millimeters range are inter-ply delamination, inter-fiber cracks or fiber breakage crossing one or multiple plies. Such damage is often encoun- tered in carbon fiber-reinforced plastics as a consequence of impact damage, proof testing of vessel structures or as manufacturing error. The current study presents results of finite element calculations to investigate the influence of those discontinuities on the propagation behavior of distinct Lamb-wave modes. 1. Introduction Among the class of engineering materials, fiber-reinforced plastics show extraordinary high strength-to-weight and stiffness-to-weight ratios. This makes them ideal materials for construc- tion of aircraft, high-performance cars or sporting goods. The design of fiber-reinforced struc- tures relies on the anisotropy of the elastic properties caused by the alignment of carbon fibers. While this anisotropy is advantageous for constructional aspects, it causes major challenges for non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of these structures. Such NDE monitoring of the structural integrity is often done by acoustic emission (AE) analysis or active guided wave monitoring. Both methods rely on the propagation of acoustic waves in flat, plate-like structures. Plate waves are the dominant mode of wave propagation in those structures, and these waves are also known as Lamb waves [Lamb, 1917]. The infinite number of Lamb wave modes, which can exist within a plate is of two types. One type shows symmetric and the other shows anti-symmetric motion with respect to the mid-plane of the plate. However, the types of modes found most often in thin- walled fiber-reinforced structures are the fundamental symmetric mode (S 0 ) and anti-symmetric mode (A 0 ), often referred to as extensional and flexural mode. Lamb-wave propagation in un- damaged carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) has been investigated extensively before [Lowe, 1995, Castaings, 2004, Wang, 2007, Sause, 2010d]. Scattering of Lamb waves at internal damage, like cracks or delamination, is the key principle for structural health monitoring (SHM) of CFRP by guided wave testing [Raghavan, 2007]. The impact of such discontinuities on AE analysis has been investigated less. Since Lamb-wave propagation is the carrier of information on AE source activity in the material, distortion of information due to interaction of Lamb waves with internal discontinuities is closely related to the question of reliability of the information.

Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

J. Acoustic Emission, 31 (2013) 1 © 2013 Acoustic Emission Group

Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite Structures

Markus G. R. Sause University of Augsburg, Institute for Physics, Experimental Physics II, D-86135 Augsburg

Abstract

Numerical studies were performed to investigate acoustic emission (AE) signal propagation

in carbon fiber-reinforced plastic plates with internal damage. For the case of thin plates, Lamb waves are the dominating mode of propagation for ultrasonic waves. The interpretation of Lamb waves is one of the main challenges for valid source localization or identification procedures. Naturally, the lateral size and the thickness of the plate have a significant impact on the propaga-tion behavior of guided waves. While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused by internal discontinuities are more difficult to understand. During loading of a composite specimen, a variety of damage types can occur, that alter the properties of the composite. Although AE signals originate from the rapid microscopic displacement within the material, the interaction of the excited acoustic waves is not limited to microscopic dimensions. Due to the wavelength of the Lamb waves in the millimeters range, the propagating Lamb-wave modes can interact with discontinuities in these dimensions as well. Typical macroscopic damage modes found in the millimeters range are inter-ply delamination, inter-fiber cracks or fiber breakage crossing one or multiple plies. Such damage is often encoun-tered in carbon fiber-reinforced plastics as a consequence of impact damage, proof testing of vessel structures or as manufacturing error. The current study presents results of finite element calculations to investigate the influence of those discontinuities on the propagation behavior of distinct Lamb-wave modes. 1. Introduction

Among the class of engineering materials, fiber-reinforced plastics show extraordinary high strength-to-weight and stiffness-to-weight ratios. This makes them ideal materials for construc-tion of aircraft, high-performance cars or sporting goods. The design of fiber-reinforced struc-tures relies on the anisotropy of the elastic properties caused by the alignment of carbon fibers. While this anisotropy is advantageous for constructional aspects, it causes major challenges for non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of these structures. Such NDE monitoring of the structural integrity is often done by acoustic emission (AE) analysis or active guided wave monitoring. Both methods rely on the propagation of acoustic waves in flat, plate-like structures. Plate waves are the dominant mode of wave propagation in those structures, and these waves are also known as Lamb waves [Lamb, 1917]. The infinite number of Lamb wave modes, which can exist within a plate is of two types. One type shows symmetric and the other shows anti-symmetric motion with respect to the mid-plane of the plate. However, the types of modes found most often in thin-walled fiber-reinforced structures are the fundamental symmetric mode (S0) and anti-symmetric mode (A0), often referred to as extensional and flexural mode. Lamb-wave propagation in un-damaged carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) has been investigated extensively before [Lowe, 1995, Castaings, 2004, Wang, 2007, Sause, 2010d]. Scattering of Lamb waves at internal damage, like cracks or delamination, is the key principle for structural health monitoring (SHM) of CFRP by guided wave testing [Raghavan, 2007]. The impact of such discontinuities on AE analysis has been investigated less. Since Lamb-wave propagation is the carrier of information on AE source activity in the material, distortion of information due to interaction of Lamb waves with internal discontinuities is closely related to the question of reliability of the information.

Page 2: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

2

Changes of modal intensity or occurrence of alternative propagation paths due to scattering can readily affect source localization accuracy and/or complicate source identification procedures. This was recently demonstrated for the case of metallic obstacles, as encountered as fasteners in composite structures [Sause, 2012d]. The purpose of the current study is the extension of the previous investigation to internal discontinuities as typically faced for the case of damaged com-posite structures. Using finite element modeling (FEM), the interaction of Lamb waves with dis-continuities is easy to visualize. It was recently demonstrated that this approach yields results consistent with experiments [Sause, 2010d, Sause, 2012b, Sause, 2012c, Sause, 2012d]. 2. Finite Element Modeling

In the following, a finite element modeling approach is applied using the software program “ComsolMultiphysics”. All descriptions only refer to the way of implementation within the module “Structural Mechanics” of this software. 2a. Simulation methodology

The calculation of stress-strain relationships is based on the structural mechanics constitutive equation. Based on the principle of virtual work the program solves the partial differential equa-tions for equilibrium conditions, expressed in global or local stress and strain components for an external stimulation.

For linear elastic media with elastic coefficientsD

, Hooks law is chosen as the constitutive

equation.

εσ ⋅=D (1)

In the general case for anisotropic media the elasticity tensor D

is a 6 x 6 matrix with 12 in-dependent components. Using the Voigt notation convention, the stress tensor can be written as vector σ with six independent components composed of normal stresses σ and shear stresses τ. The strain tensor is written similarly as vector ε , which also has six independent components consisting of normal components ε and shear strain components γ. In the case of isotropic media the elasticity tensor is completely described by Young’s modulus E and the Poisson ratio ν.

The principle of virtual work states that the variation of W induced by forces Fi and virtual

displacements dui in an equilibrium state equals zero:

∑ =⋅=i

ii uFW 0δδ (2)

Generally, the external applied virtual work equals the internal virtual work and in the case of a deformable body with volume V and surface S, results in a deformation state with new internal stress and strain components.

0=⋅−⋅+⋅ ∫∫∫ dVdVFudSFuV

t

VV

t

SS

t σεδδδ (3)

The external applied forces SF

and VF

act on the surface and volume of the body, respectively. The constraint forces within the material are expressed by consistent internal stress σ and strain ε components, with the superscript t indicating the transposed vectors.

Page 3: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

3

To extend the principle of virtual work for dynamic systems, mass accelerations are intro-duced. This yields the formulation of the d’Alembert principle, which states that a state of dy-namic equilibrium exists if the virtual work for arbitrary virtual displacements vanishes. Taking this into account and introducing the material density ρ, equation (3) becomes:

02

2

=⋅∂∂−⋅−⋅+⋅ ∫∫∫∫ dVutudVdVFudSFu

VV

t

VV

t

SS

t

δρσεδδδ (4)

This defines the basic differential equation solved for every finite element. In order to model structural mechanics problems, a suitable geometry and respective boundary conditions have to be defined. 2b. Model description

The model setup used in this study is shown in Fig. 1. A rectangular plate of 400 mm × 400 mm size and 1 mm thickness is used as propagation medium. Elastic properties of unidirectional CFRP plate are used as given in Table 1. Fiber direction of the unidirectional lamina is oriented along the 0° axis as noted in Fig. 1. Two symmetry planes were chosen to reduce the volume modeled to one quarter of the overall volume. The symmetry planes are the yz- and xz-plane with respect to the origin of the coordinate system.

Fig. 1. 3-dimensional model setup used for simulation of Lamb-wave propagation.

As AE source model, a point dipole was chosen following [Gary, 1994]. As demonstrated in

[Hamstad, 2002] such point dipoles can be used to excite particular fundamental Lamb-wave modes in isotropic plates. In contrast to complex source models based on micromechanical con-siderations [Sause, 2010a, Sause, 2010b], point dipoles are computationally more efficient to investigate Lamb-wave propagation in larger structures. The position of the point dipole was chosen at (x, y, z) = (0.00, 0.00, 0.53) mm, slightly asymmetric with respect to the mid-plane of the plate, to excite a reasonable amount of S0 and A0 Lamb wave modes at the same time. The length of the dipole (oriented in x-direction) was chosen to be 200 µm. A linear ramp function with excitation time 1et µs= and maximum force max 3F N= was used.

CFRP (unidirectional 0°)

z

xy

xz-symmetry plane

200 mm200 mm

model source

1.0 mm

yz-symmetry plane

points for signal detection 0°: (x,y,z) = (100,0,1) mm45°: (x,y,z) = (71,71,1) mm90°: (x,y,z) = (0,100,1) mm

90°

damaged area (e.g. crack)

origin (x,y,z) = (0,0,0) mm

Page 4: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

4

max

max

( )( ) e e

e

F t t t tF t

F t t⋅ ≤⎧

= ⎨ >⎩ (5)

All signals are evaluated at 100-mm distance to the AE source in 0°, 45° and 90° propagation direction as z-displacement on the top surface of the plate.

The region of internal damage starts at a distance of 50 mm from the source in the 0°-direction. This configuration was chosen, since complementary studies with obstacles placed in 90° orientation to the fibers confirmed that the influence of the obstacles is largest in the 0° case. Details of the various configurations are shown in Figs. 2-4. Each of the modeled geometries refers to one prototype of internal damage.

Inter-fiber cracks (also called matrix cracks) weaken the link between neighboring fibers and

can thus affect the transmission of acoustic waves. In the chosen configuration, the growth direc-tion of such cracks is along the fiber axis direction (0°). From the perspective of wave propaga-tion, the worst case is a growth of such cracks through the complete thickness. This configura-tion is studied here as cut through the plate with width of 25 µm and various lengths as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. 3-dimensional model geometry used for simulation of inter-fiber cracks (cut along fiber axis direction).

As the second prototype, rupture of fibers can accumulate locally and can become a macro-scopic crack. In the current configuration this is modeled as a 100-µm thick cut perpendicular to the fiber axis direction as shown in Fig. 3. Since such crack growth typically initiates ultimate failure of the load carrying structure, we investigated three depths of the cut to investigate the influence on wave propagation. The depth of 0.5 mm already refers to a significant amount of damage, reflecting a rupture of more than 800,000 fiber filaments. Also, for bending loads, the initiation of these cracks is typically found on the surface of the structure. Therefore, the current model, with damage starting on the surface, exhibits an asymmetric location of the crack with respect to the mid-plane.

The third prototype is inter-ply delamination. This is an in-plane discontinuity that weakens the local bending stiffness of the plate and is often encountered in fiber-reinforced structures as a consequence of impact damage, excessive loading or even as residue of the manufacturing pro-cess. Since this can occur in various extents, we investigate three different sizes to reflect rea-sonable variability of the size of the delaminated area. For all configurations a thickness of the delamination of 50 µm is chosen, centered within the plate.

7.5 mm

20 mm

width: 25 µm

50 mm distance to AE source

z

xy

10 mm

width: 25 µm

5 mm

width: 25 µm

Page 5: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

5

Fig. 3. 3-dimensional model geometry used for simulation of broken fibers (cut perpendicular to fiber axis direction).

Fig. 4. 3-dimensional model geometry used for simulation of inter-ply delamination (cut parallel to fiber axis direction).

Table 1. List of elastic properties used for finite element modeling.

Density [kg/m³] Elasticity Constants [GPa] T800/913 (unidirectional) 1550 C11=154.0

C12= C13=3.7 C22= C33=9.5 C23=5.2 C44=2.5 C66= C55=4.2

For accurate resolution of calculated signals, a maximum element size of 1.0 mm edge length

was chosen for tetrahedral mesh elements with quadratic order of the geometry shape functions. To resolve geometric details in narrow regions the mesh was locally refined down to a minimum edge length of 5 µm. The temporal resolution was chosen to be 100 ns and results were calculat-ed for the first 100 µs after signal excitation. Convergence of simulation results with respect to mesh resolution and temporal resolution was previously checked by subsequent refinement. To this end mesh resolution was increased to 0.5 mm edge length and temporal resolution was in-creased to 5 ns. Results of these calculations were found to have a coherence level ≥ 0.998 to the current settings within the frequency range between 1 kHz and 2 MHz. 4. Results

In the following, the influence of the modeled damage on the signal propagation is investi-gated. Figure 5 shows the Choi-Williams distribution (CWD) of the calculation result for signal

z

xy

0.500 mm

20 mm

0.250 mm

20 mm

0.125 mm

20 mm

50 mm distance to AE source

z

xy

height:50 µm

20 mm

5 mm

50 mm distance to AE source

height:50 µm

20 mm

10 mmheight:50 µm

20 mm

20 mm

Page 6: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

6

propagation along the 0° axis of the unidirectional CFRP plate [Choi, 1989]. The CWD in Fig. 5-a uses a different color, frequency and time range than Fig. 5-b, which is used to emphasize the S0-mode at the initial part of the signal. To identify particular Lamb wave modes, the dispersion curves of the fundamental modes were calculated by the software package provided by [Zeyede, 2010]. As indicated by the superimposed dispersion curves for the S0-mode at 100 mm and 300 mm source distance, the S0-mode is reflected at the edge of the plate in x-direction and is detected more than once. The CWD result of the A0-mode shown in Fig. 3-b agrees well with the calculated result of the A0 dispersion curve for 100 mm distance. The small dips in the curve seen at 52 µs and 62 µs are caused by multiple reflections of the S0-mode, which has been re-flected at all edges of the plate at this time. The calculation results for the pure CFRP plate in Fig. 5 will act as a reference case to evaluate the influence of any damage modeled within the propagation path. A comparison of the calculated wave-fields will be made in section 5.

Fig. 5. Simulation results of signal propagation at 100 mm distance along 0° direction in unidi-rectional CFRP. Truncated time scale shows S0-mode (a) and full time scale shows A0-mode (b).

0200400600800

100012001400160018002000

(a)

Fre

quen

cy [k

Hz]

0.000

0.004000

0.008000

0.01200

0.01600

0.02000

CFRP Reference

edge reflection

0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

-10-505

10

Dis

plac

emen

t [fm

]

Time [ms]

S0-mode (100mm) S0-mode (300mm)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

(b)

Fre

quen

cy [k

Hz]

0.000

4.000

8.000

12.00

16.00

20.00

CFRP Reference

0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

Dis

plac

emen

t [nm

]

Time [ms]

A0-mode (100mm) S0-mode (100mm)

Page 7: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

7

4a. Inter-fiber cracks Inter-fiber cracks are one of the basic damage types found in fiber-reinforced composites.

These are cracks with propagation direction parallel to the fiber axis direction. Since the strength of the direction perpendicular to the fiber axis is the weak link between the fibers, this type of damage is observed frequently in composite structures. In the current configuration, the inter-fiber crack is modeled as crack-through process, i.e. the crack reaches from the top to the bottom of the plate. The length of the inter-fiber crack is varied between 5 mm and 20 mm to cover a broad range of macroscopic crack sizes.

As seen in Fig. 6 for the S0-mode detected in damaged structures, there are only negligible

differences compared to the reference case. In contrast, there is a detectable influence of the presence of the inter-fiber cracks on the initial part of the A0-mode. For the various lengths of 5 mm, 10 mm and 20 mm of the inter-fiber crack no significant differences are observed relative to each other besides a small signature at 63 µs.

Fig. 6. Simulation results of signal after propagation of 100 mm along 0° direction in unidirec-tional CFRP with inter-fiber cracks of various lengths. 4b. Broken fibers

Among the damage types found in fiber-reinforced composites, a rupture of the load bearing constituents is the most severe damage. In the current model, the presence of such discontinuous fiber filaments is taken into account by an air gap with extension perpendicular to the fiber axis direction (see Fig. 3). To take into account the various degrees of damage for this type of failure, the depth of the air gap in the plate thickness direction is varied between 0.125 mm and 0.500 mm.

As seen in Fig. 7, the influence of the discontinuity on the first arrival of the S0-mode

(t < 20 µs) is negligible for all cases investigated. Dependent on the through-thickness dimension of the modeled discontinuity, a secondary peak arises around 35 µs. This is caused by modal conversion of the incident primary S0-mode at the discontinuity into a secondary A0-mode and

0 20 40 60 80 100

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35 Reference 5mm 10mm 20mm

Dis

plac

emen

t [nm

]

Time [µs]

Page 8: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

8

into a secondary S0-mode (see Fig. 9 and Fig. 10, also [Sause, 2012d]). The later parts of the signal (t > 40 µs) are also affected by this interaction, which causes a superposition of the inci-dent A0-mode with the multiple reflections of the secondary modes. It is worth noting that the model is energy conservative. Still, the calculated amplitude of the signals is distinctly different. This is solely caused by the presence of the broken fibers, which cause a preferential scattering of the displacement field, which transfers energy from the in-plane displacement to the out-of-plane displacement.

Fig. 7. Simulation results of signal after propagation of 100 mm along 0° direction in unidirec-tional CFRP with broken fibers modeled with various dimensions. 4c Inter-ply delamination

Inter-ply delamination is one of the most common types of damage found in fiber-reinforced composites, since it is often caused by local impact or as residue of a manufacturing error. Dur-ing mechanical testing of fiber-reinforced structures, delamination can evolve step by step and can affect the elastic properties along the signal propagation path. Thus, the influence of delami-nation on the detected AE signals is of considerable interest. To resemble the variety of dimen-sions of inter-ply delamination, the size of the delaminated area in the in-plane direction was varied between 5 mm and 20 mm (see Fig. 4).

Figure 8 shows the calculated signals for all three inter-ply delamination sizes investigated

and the reference signal for comparison. For the S0-mode there are only negligible differences observed to the reference case. Since propagation of the S0-mode is dominated by the in-plane stiffness, this is explained by considering a multi-layer specimen composed of 950 µm CFRP and 50 µm air. The in-plane stiffness of such a plate is as close as 95 % of the stiffness of a pure 1000-µm CFRP plate. A larger influence is observed for the propagation behavior of the A0-mode. The shape and intensity of the A0-modes differ from the reference signal due to the change of local bending stiffness as introduced by the inter-ply delamination. With increasing size of the inter-ply delamination, the deviation compared to the reference case increases as well.

0 20 40 60 80 100

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50 Reference 0.125mm 0.250mm 0.500mm

Dis

plac

emen

t [nm

]

Time [µs]

Page 9: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

9

Fig. 8. Simulation results of signal after propagation of 100 mm along 0° direction in unidirec-tional CFRP with inter-ply delamination of various dimensions. 5. Discussion

In the present study, the interaction of Lamb-wave modes with different types of internal damage in unidirectional CFRP plates was investigated by means of finite element modeling. For evaluation of the signals a unidirectional CFRP plate was chosen as propagation medium, since this exhibits a maximal elastic anisotropy. The wave fields obtained for the reference case with-out obstacles, a modeled 20-mm long inter-fiber crack, a 0.5-mm deep broken fibers and a 10-mm long inter-ply delamination are shown in Figs. 9 and 10 for two distinct times t = 20 µs and t = 40 µs after signal excitation.

The interaction of the different types of damage with the incident S0-mode is visualized best in the wave-fields in Fig. 9. For the inter-fiber cracks and inter-ply delamination, only weak in-teraction with the S0-mode is found. In contrast, for the broken fibers, the incident S0-mode caus-es excitation of a strong secondary A0-mode with a radiation pattern around the crack, which acts as an epicenter. This is caused by a modal conversion of the primary S0-mode into a secondary A0-mode, since the primary wave front of the A0-mode did not arrive at the position of the mod-eled crack for t < 20 µs. Subsequent to the emission of the secondary A0-mode, an excitation of a secondary S0-mode is observed as well.

In Fig. 10, the wave field for t = 40 µs shows the interaction of the A0-mode with the differ-

ent types of modeled damage. Again only weak interaction is found between the A0-mode and the modeled inter-fiber cracks or the modeled inter-ply delamination as shown in Figs. 10-b and 10-c. For the broken fibers, similar as for the incident S0-mode, the A0-mode is significantly af-fected by the presence of the discontinuity.

0 20 40 60 80 100

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40 Reference 5mm 10mm 20mm

Dis

plac

emen

t [nm

]

Time [µs]

Page 10: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

10

Fig. 9. Comparison of simulated wave fields of z-displacement for reference (a), 10-mm inter-fiber crack (b), 10-mm delamination (c) and 0.5-mm broken fibers (d) at t = 20 µs after signal excitation.

Fig. 10. Comparison of simulated wave fields z-displacement for reference (a), 10 mm inter-fiber crack (b), 10 mm delamination (c) and 0.5 mm broken fibers (d) at t = 40 µs after signal excita-tion.

S0-modeA0-mode

primary S0-mode

negligible interaction

primary S0-mode transmitted S0-mode

secondary A0-modes

weak interaction

a) b)

c) d)

Reference (pure CFRP) Inter-Fiber cracks

Delamination Broken Fibers

t = 20µs, z-displacement [nm] t = 20µs, z-displacement [nm]

t = 20µs, z-displacement [nm] t = 20µs, z-displacement [nm]

50mm

S0-mode

A0-mode

small deviation to reference

disturbance of wave field

weak interaction with A0-mode

t = 40µs, z-displacement [nm] t = 40µs, z-displacement [nm]

t = 40µs, z-displacement [nm] t = 40µs, z-displacement [nm]

reflected S0-mode

Reference (pure CFRP) Inter-Fiber cracks

Delamination

a) b)

c) d) Broken Fibers

50mm

Page 11: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

11

In order to investigate the influence of the simulated damage on AE analysis, the calculated signals are processed in a similar way as typical for experimental signals. Thus, AE features are extracted from the signals and arrival times of the S0-mode and the A0-mode are calculated for a distance of 100 mm in all propagation directions of 0°, 45° and 90°. Table 2 lists all AE parame-ters and arrival times of the cases studied. For calculation of signal energies and signal amplitude an artificial sensor sensitivity of 4.5x109 V/m was assumed.

Table 2. Definition of AE features.

AE feature Definition Amplitude [mV] 𝑈!"#

Absolute energy [J] 𝐸 = 𝑈 𝑡 ! 10𝑘�𝑑𝑡!!"

!

Peak frequency [kHz] 𝑓!"#$

Frequency centroid [kHz] 𝑓!"#$%&'( =𝑓 ∙ 𝑈(𝑓)𝑑𝑓𝑈 𝑓 𝑑𝑓

Weighted Peak frequency [kHz] 𝑓!"#$% = 𝑓!"#$ ∙ 𝑓!"#$%&'(

Partial Power 1 [%] !! ! !"!!!!

!! ! !"!"##$%&!"#$

PP1: f1 = 0 kHz; f2 = 150 kHz PP2: f1 = 150 kHz; f2 = 300 kHz PP3: f1 = 300 kHz; f2 = 450 kHz PP4: f1 = 450 kHz; f2 = 600 kHz PP5: f1 = 600 kHz; f2 = 900 kHz PP6: f1 = 900 kHz; f2 = 1200 kHz

Partial Power 2 [%]

Partial Power 3 [%]

Partial Power 4 [%]

Partial Power 5 [%]

Partial Power 6 [%]

Partial Power = !! ! !"!!

!!

!! ! !"!"##$%&!"#$

The definition of features is based on the basic properties derived from the signal in time

domain 𝑈 𝑡 and in frequency domain 𝑈 𝑓 as shown in Figs. 11-a and 11-b, respectively. 𝑈!"# is the maximum signal amplitude, as seen in Fig. 11-a, while the absolute energy is derived from the integral of U t ! within the investigated time of 100 µs. f!"#$ defines the frequency position of maximum FFT-magnitude as seen in Fig. 11-b, while f!"#$%&'( is defined in Table 2. Defini-tion of the different Partial Power features is given in Table 2 as well.

Arrival times of S0-mode and A0-mode are picked from the CWDs following the method in-

troduced by Hamstad et al. [Hamstad, 2008]. Thus, arrival of the mode is picked as the time of maximum coefficient intensity of the respective mode at a constant frequency (500 kHz in the current case).

In the following, the influence of the internal damage types on the extracted signal features is discussed using the initial arrival time (S0-mode arrival), the signal amplitude and the weighted peak frequency representative for the other features of Table 3.

Page 12: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

12

Fig. 11. Extraction of features from acoustic emission signals in time (a) and frequency domain (b).

t0

tAE

threshold level

Umax

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10

-0.010

-0.005

0.000

0.005

0.010

(a)

Am

plitu

de [m

V]

Time [ms]

Page 13: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

13

Table 3. Values of AE features extracted from the calculated signals in various propagation di-rections. C

onfiguration

Arrival tim

e S0 [ µs]

Arrival tim

e A0 [µs]

Am

plitude [mV

]

Absolute energy [nJ]

Peak frequency [kH

z]

Weighted Peak fre-

quency [kHz]

Frequency centroid [kH

z]

Partial Power 1[%

]

Partial Power 2 [%

]

Partial Power 3 [%

]

Partial Power 4 [%

]

Partial Power 5 [%

]

Partial Power 6 [%

]

Reference 0° 1 9.2 81.6 342.5 23.4 39.1 124.5 396.5 59.5 13.3 13.7 7.0 10.9 1.6 45° 11 23.8 90.2 30.5 23.6 127.0 232.4 425.3 38.6 21.2 17.8 9.2 23.4 2.3 90° 21 33.5 44.6 24.9 23.6 293.0 504.9 870.0 16.0 18.4 17.9 8.9 2.2 15.5 Inter-fiber cracks 5mm-0° 2 9.3 91.7 388.2 55.6 29.3 72.3 178.4 77.6 12.8 4.3 1.7 11.8 1.5 5mm-45° 12 24.8 90.2 32.3 55.8 87.9 229.9 601.4 30.6 15.3 23.1 17.0 15.6 2.2 5mm-90° 22 35.6 37.0 26.5 55.8 117.2 234.2 468.2 20.9 23.6 24.1 14.3 2.3 1.5 10mm-0° 3 9.2 91.8 498.3 58.0 29.3 73.7 185.5 68.7 15.4 8.7 3.8 8.0 1.1 10mm-45° 13 24.7 90.2 31.4 58.2 87.9 223.7 569.3 40.6 21.6 18.0 9.4 13.6 2.4 10mm-90° 23 31.9 40.8 24.2 58.3 263.7 353.6 474.2 22.0 24.4 25.1 13.7 2.1 1.2 20mm-0° 4 8.9 91.5 556.4 64.1 29.3 71.7 175.7 66.3 17.0 9.6 4.2 8.5 0.9 20mm-45° 14 23.1 90.2 32.0 64.4 87.9 225.6 579.2 41.5 20.8 17.6 9.2 18.5 2.5 20mm-90° 24 29.3 40.6 30.4 64.4 263.7 338.7 435.0 19.9 23.0 24.4 13.3 3.6 0.9 Fiber breaks 0.125mm-0° 5 9.4 90.0 369.7 44.1 29.3 70.2 168.1 77.9 7.7 5.9 3.6 11.9 1.3 0.125mm-45° 15 25.6 90.2 29.8 44.3 87.9 229.1 597.3 42.2 16.9 18.1 8.4 19.0 2.5 0.125mm-90° 25 31.8 37.0 30.0 44.3 439.5 438.8 438.2 16.7 20.6 27.5 15.4 4.9 0.8 0.25mm-0° 6 9.4 90.0 533.7 54.0 19.5 64.8 214.9 63.0 13.3 11.1 6.8 16.5 0.9 0.25mm-45° 16 25.3 92.5 37.5 54.2 87.9 227.2 587.6 36.6 15.0 18.1 11.7 19.0 2.2 0.25mm-90° 26 31.7 36.9 29.7 54.3 439.5 423.6 408.3 17.0 20.0 25.0 17.0 6.0 1.0 0.5mm-0° 7 9.4 90.8 993.1 122.0 9.8 60.3 372.9 50.0 19.0 15.0 9.0 10.6 1.0 0.5mm-45° 17 23.7 92.5 45.3 122.0 87.9 220.5 553.1 37.3 15.1 22.9 12.3 21.0 1.9 0.5mm-90° 27 30.9 41.0 32.8 122.0 439.5 451.6 464.0 15.0 18.0 24.0 21.0 3.0 1.0 Delamination 5mm-0° 8 9.4 92.3 358.0 39.5 29.3 85.7 250.8 81.0 9.0 3.0 2.0 10.0 2.0 5mm-45° 18 24.6 92.5 34.1 39.7 97.7 249.3 636.7 40.9 19.0 17.1 10.2 27.0 2.9 5mm-90° 28 29.7 36.8 31.4 39.8 293.0 368.1 462.6 14.0 18.0 22.0 17.0 4.0 1.0 10mm-0° 9 9.4 102.0 322.1 35.4 39.1 128.3 421.6 76.0 11.0 4.0 3.0 19.9 3.0 10mm-45° 19 24.8 39.2 35.1 35.7 97.7 247.3 626.4 36.0 20.0 12.7 9.0 29.0 2.3 10mm-90° 29 32.0 68.6 24.6 35.8 293.0 384.0 503.3 16.0 19.0 20.0 15.0 4.0 1.4 20mm-0° 10 9.4 42.0 523.6 59.0 39.1 146.8 552.0 62.0 18.0 9.0 4.0 7.5 3.0 20mm-45° 20 24.2 90.2 40.7 59.4 87.9 226.2 582.2 42.6 22.5 18.0 6.8 19.0 2.6 20mm-90° 30 29.3 71.0 31.1 59.5 175.8 281.1 449.5 21.0 23.0 21.0 14.0 10.9 2.0

Page 14: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

14

5a. Influence on arrival time In order to obtain valid source locations, a proper determination of the initial arrival time is a

key requirement for most of the currently used localization algorithms. The significant influence of the various internal damage types on the propagation behavior of the signals was already demonstrated in section 4. In Fig. 12, the extracted initial arrival times are shown for all damage configurations and the reference case in 0°, 45° and 90° propagation direction. The largest influ-ence of the internal damage types is found for the 90° propagation direction, which demon-strates, that the complete wave-field is affected by the presence of the damage and not solely the part of the wave propagating through the obstacle (0° direction).

Based on the maximum deviation of 4.2 µs to the reference case of the calculated arrival time

of the S0-mode in 90° propagation direction, a corresponding error of localization in the range of several centimeters can be expected. The estimation is based on the calculated group velocity of the S0-mode in 90° propagation direction.

A significantly larger influence was found for the arrival time of the A0 mode. Due to modal

conversion occurring at the internal damage, the arrival of the first detectable A0-mode is 48.6 µs ahead compared to the reference case in one configuration. However, this is not the arrival of the primary A0 mode as discussed before. For the majority of the cases studied, the arrival times of the A0 mode are within 10 µs difference to the reference case. Consequently, for localization methods using arrival times of both fundamental Lamb wave modes, the observed difference in arrival time of the A0 mode might have a large impact as well.

Fig. 12. Calculated arrival time of S0-mode for the various configurations of internal damage in comparison to the reference case for 0°, 45° and 90° propagation direction.

0 5 10 15 20 25 305

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Reference case Inter-Fiber cracks Broken Fibers Inter-ply Delamination

90°

45°

S0 a

rriv

al ti

me

[µs]

configuration

Page 15: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

15

5b. Influence on signal features For source identification procedures one approach is the use of parameter-based pattern

recognition [Sause, 2010c, Sause, 2010a, Sause, 2012a]. Since cracks and delamination are likely to evolve between AE source positions and the position of detection during specimen loading, their influence on the transmitted Lamb waves has to be understood thoroughly.

From the list of calculated features given in Table 2, some were found to deviate more than

100 % from the reference case. One example is the signal amplitude values shown in Fig. 13 for each configuration, evaluated in 0°, 45° and 90° propagation directions. Compared to the refer-ence case (red), the signals passing through the damaged region experience large changes of their signal amplitude. This is due to the modal conversion at the damage position, and the scattering introduced by some of the damage types. These effects are not taken into account by the conven-tional definitions for calculation of signal amplitude or AE signal energies as given in Table 2. Except for configuration 7, the overall deviation of amplitude values was found to be within ± 0.25 V (i.e. ± 5 dBAE) to the reference case. Compared to the ± 3 dBAE recommendation of ASTM E 2191 for sensor replacement this amplitude range is well within typically encountered uncertainties of measurement setups used.

Fig. 13. Calculated signal amplitude of signals for the various configurations of internal damage in comparison to the reference case for 0°, 45° and 90° propagation direction.

The calculated weighted Peak-Frequency for the signals of different damage configurations and the reference case are shown in Fig. 14 for 0°, 45° and 90° propagation directions. Depend-ent on the propagation angle, different values for the weighted peak frequency are observed. This is caused by the asymmetric propagation of Lamb-wave modes in the unidirectional plate mod-eled herein. Similar to the signal amplitude, deviations compared to the reference case are up to 100 %. Again, features evaluated in all propagation directions are affected by the presence of the modeled damage types. The range of feature values seems unacceptably high in order to perform

0 5 10 15 20 25 300.000.010.020.030.040.050.060.07

0.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

Reference case Inter-Fiber cracks Broken Fibers Inter-ply Delamination

ampl

itude

[V]

configuration

Page 16: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

16

valid source identification based on frequency features, since the modeled source type is identi-cal for all cases studied.

Fig. 14. Calculated weighted peak frequency of signals for the various configurations of internal damage in comparison to the reference case for 0°, 45° and 90° propagation direction.

However, for pattern recognition methods, there is a typical experimentally encountered dis-tribution range for an individual feature. This is demonstrated in Fig. 15. Here, the experimental-ly detected signal features of a double cantilever beam experiment including their classification into matrix cracking, interfacial failure and fiber breakage are shown. Details of the experimental setup are found in [Sause, 2010d, Sause, 2012b], while references [Sause, 2010c, Sause, 2012a] focus on the underlying methodology. The black data points are the resulting feature values of the current simulation work with black circles marking the signals propagation direction. For the current evaluation along one propagation direction, the feature range observed is quite compara-ble to the typical extent of one cluster observed for a particular failure mechanism (i.e. matrix cracking, interfacial failure or fiber breakage). Thus, the presence of a failure type, as modeled herein, is expected to increase the dimensions of the cluster belonging to a particular failure type.

6. Conclusions

Within this study the influence of internal damage in fiber-reinforced composites on signal propagation of Lamb waves was investigated. For the present study a unidirectional fiber-reinforced plate was studied, including embedded models for inter-fiber cracks, broken fibers and inter-ply delamination located in the 0° direction of the plate.

Overall, a significant influence on the signals from all damage types was observed that is well detectable with piezoelectric sensors, and thus a feasible approach for SHM utilizing guided wave monitoring.

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

100

200

300

400

500 Reference case Inter-Fiber cracks Broken Fibers Inter-ply Delamination

Wei

gted

Pea

k Fr

eque

ncy

[kH

z]

configuration

45°

90°

Page 17: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

17

Fig. 15. Diagram of weighted peak frequency vs. partial power 3 of experimental measurement of double cantilever beam specimen [Sause, 2010d] compared to positions of features extracted from simulated signals for 0°, 45° and 90° propagation direction (all configurations).

For AE analysis, the largest impact is expected for source localization routines, since the in-ternal damage types can act as virtual AE source caused by modal conversion effects. This sig-nificantly alters the emitted wave field of the original source and may even affect the initial arri-val time of the different wave modes, causing substantial errors during source localization.

Also, energetic features and frequency features extracted from the Lamb-wave signals are in-

fluenced by the presence of internal damage. In some configurations, the influence on a particu-lar feature value was found to be very significant. However, the overall range of values of the extracted features is comparable to ranges where pattern recognition approaches still can lead to valid classifications of source mechanisms. In contrast, the evaluation of signals with different observation angles relative to the source positions might cause a larger impact with respect to the accuracy of pattern recognition methods. Acknowledgment

I would like to thank Marvin A. Hamstad for the possibility to discuss AE sensing technolo-gies and signal propagation in fiber-reinforced polymers. Literature [Castaings, 2004] M. Castaings, C. Bacon, B. Hosten and M. V. Predoi (2004), J.

Acoust. Soc. Am., 115:3, 1125-1133. [Choi, 1989] H. Choi, W. Williams, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and

Signal Processing, 37:6, 862-872.

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10000

20

40

60

80

100

45°90°

Cluster 0 (Matrix cracking) Cluster 1 (Interface failure) Cluster 2 (Fiber breakage)

Par

tial P

ower

3 [%

]

Weighted Peak-Frequency [kHz]

Page 18: Acoustic Emission Signal Propagation in Damaged Composite ... - … · While these geometric dimensions can be understood as bounda-ry conditions, distortions of wave patterns caused

18

[Gary, 1994] J. Gary and M. A. Hamstad (1994), J. Acoustic Emission, 12:3-4, 157-170.

[Hamstad, 2002] M.A. Hamstad, A. O’Gallagher, J. Gary, J. Acoustic Emission, 12:3-4, 157-170.

[Hamstad, 2008] M.A. Hamstad, J. Acoustic Emission, 26, 40-59. [Lamb, 1917] H Lamb, ‘On Waves in an Elastic Plate’, Proceedings of the Royal

Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, Vol 93, pp 114-128, 1917.

[Lowe, 1995] M. Lowe, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Fre-quency Control, 42:4, 525-542.

[Raghavan, 2007] A. Raghavan, C. Cesnik,The Shock and Vibration Digest, 39, 91-114.

[Sause, 2010a] M. G. R. Sause and S. Horn (2010), J. Nondest. Eval., 29:2, 123-142. [Sause, 2010b] M. G. R. Sause and S. Horn (2010), J. Acoustic Emission, 28, 142-

154. [Sause, 2010c] M. G. R. Sause (2010), Identification of failure mechanisms in hy-

brid materials utilizing pattern recognition techniques applied to acoustic emission analysis, PhD-thesis, mbv-Verlag, Berlin.

[Sause, 2010d] M. G. R. Sause and S. Horn, Influence of Specimen Geometry on Acoustic Emission Signals in Fiber Reinforced Composites: FEM-Simulations and Experiments, 29th European Conference on Acoustic Emission Testing, Vienna 09/2010

[Sause, 2012a] M.G.R. Sause, A. Gribov, A.R. Unwin, S. Horn, Pat. Rec. Letters, 33:1, 17-23.

[Sause, 2012b] M.G.R. Sause, T. Müller, A. Horoschenkoff, S. Horn, Comp. Sci. Technol., 72, 167-174.

[Sause, 2012c] M.G.R. Sause, M.A. Hamstad, S. Horn, Sens. Act. A., 184, 64-71. [Sause, 2012d] M. G. R. Sause, S. Horn, Influence of Internal Discontinuities on

Ultrasonic Signal Propagation in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics, 30thEuropean Conference on Acoustic emission Testing, Granada 09/2012

[Wang, 2007] L. Wang, F. Yuan, Comp. Sci. Technol., 67, 1370-1384. [Zeyede, 2010] R. Zeyede,Notes on orthotropic Lamb waves, Technion - Israel Insti-

tute of Technology, http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/elasticsim/