17
A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL ND FPPIED PHYSICS LS It A FARRELL ET AL. SEP 85 UNLSSIFIE JN /APL I MM 4-8 -- 30SiF/ 12/ NL I.E

A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL NDFPPIED PHYSICS LS It A FARRELL ET AL. SEP 85

UNLSSIFIE JN /APL I MM 4-8 --30SiF/ 12/ NL

I.E

Page 2: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

--.-- vr ~-.~-- . z - --.- .

'4_

r2.

4,0- 1 2.0

1.11.8

1111.25 [41116

MtCROCOPE 'SOLuTiON TEST CH4PT

f.4 I-. 84 A F ,TAAP S - 963

I

I

I

I

- .... - . .. . - - . -- . , " .

Page 3: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

JHU APL

TG 1350

SEPTEMBER 1985

I,.?co

DEMONSTRATION OF AJACOBI POLYNOMIAL REPRESENTATIONOF A KRONECKER DELTA FUNCTION

RICHARD A. FARRELL

ERNEST P. GRAY

ROBERT W. HART

10 22 042

Page 4: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

UNCLASSIFIED PLEASE FOLD BACK IF NOT NEEDEDSECURIPY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE FOR BIBLIOGRAPHIC PURPOSES

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEla REPOP" SECURITY CLASSIFICATION I lb RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS

L nla'.ified

2a SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY 3 DISTRIBUTION'AVAILABILITY OF REPORT

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

2t DECQASSI'-CAT;-N DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE

4-PERFORMINO ORGANIZA'ION NUMBERS S MONITORING ORGAN4IZATION REPORT NUMBERS,.

jilt API I(I 135 iHl' API 163 t350

6a NAME OF PArORMING OPGANIZA71ON Et OFICr SYMBOL 7a NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATIONIt AopOCab'e

[ti Ioh1, -li'pki', L 0.Q.'r, .

Na\al Plant Representatis e Office\p;':, . t11 I!'. I . h, , r ,r RI P

r, A_:RI S a . 3 ale 4W P ,7b ADDRESS ICily. Slate. and ZIP Code

I him. Hopkit, Road Johns Hopkins Road

I turcl. \lrland 21l1-- 1 aurel, Maryland 20707

'AYT K*. N."G SONSO;RINi, O"RGANI,,AION T (OIFICE SYMBOL 9 PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERIIt Aophcaitle l

Na a N'c 'bItt ( ,I1and i N00024-85-C-5301

5. A S 7 Slae ad Z, Code 10 SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS

PROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNIT*20,12 ELEMENT NO NO NO 3J ACCESSION NO

T s" ' ,, secure. Classfcat,

Dcrnon, rlil M1 a .J acobl Pol nomal Reprc'entation of a Kroneck er Delta 1'unction (U)

12 PERSONAL AU'14OR,S,

IaTfcIl. Ri hard A, (ira,. [ri.ost P.; Hart, Robert %,

*,a '"A1 2' Pf";n " 3b TIME COVERED 14 DATE OF REPORT (Year Month1 Day 5 , PAGE COUNT

I .lilia \lMtorandum I k iif 1985. September 14

t* ,ATI CFODES 18 SUBJECT TERMS

S,'.- P SUB GROUP i Kronecker delta function

Jacobi polynomials. .. . . .... . fluid shells -

S- 1-- ' -cPssa,, and dertfy by block number,

\ ' n , ! .' Nholc ha' brci gencraltied to obtain an expansion of the Kronecker delta function as an infinite series invols.ing the products

A", . a ,1 A, r, 21 ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

. *. '-,AM[ AS RPT 0- DTIC USERS I I nclasified

A. ', ", . ', , . t, 22b TELEPHONE (include Area Code) 22c OFFICE SYMBOL

,' (30) 953-50)0(3 NPRO

M .t SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE

* -UNCLASSIFIED

Page 5: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

* IJHU/APL

TG 1350

SEPTEMBER 1985

Tecbiical Memorandum

DEMONSTRATION OF AJACOBI POLYNOMIAL REPRESENTATIONOF A KRONECKER DELTA FUNCTION

RICHARD A. FARRELL

ERNEST P. GRAY

ROBERT W. HART

ii

- . THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYJohns Hopkins Road, Laurel, Maryland 20707

0.,Na.

A,Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited

I "

Page 6: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY

ABSTrRACT

N\ formula dens ed bN Noble has been generalized to obtain an espansiollof the K roitecker delta f'unction as an inl'inite series insolsi ni the products~ ofmo5 la,:obi polx'noinlials.

Page 7: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

T HE JOH~NS HOPKINS UNIVE 14SITYi

APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYAUALL MARYLAND

INTRODUCTION

In our ins estigations of the inviscid, incompressible flow of rotating fluidshells confined between concentric, spherical, rigid, co-rotating boundaries.

m~k sC cnCOUntercd the need for a proof of a Kronecker delta function representa-tion in terms of a series of products of two Jacobi polynomials. In particular,%c required a proof that

2"

kkhcrc

F, (A) - E - --- ---- _ __-

An(k+,A+l+ )(k-+p,+ I

X x~j '(A 1'1' (A) ,( 0/ 1 . (2)

For (%Aj )> -- 1, the P,'3 '(A) are the Jacobi polynomials which are orthogo-nal over the interval (-1, + 1) with the integration weight factor w M)(I -- x) (l + x)". They are normalized by the relation Pn " )(I) = i(a, +n + )

*[F'(n i- i)F(c± + )], w ith F(z) the gamma (factorial) function. For (a,,(3) !s - 1,the Jacobi polynomials' P,('' 3)(A) are defined in terms of the polynomials for((x,0) > -I through repeated applications of the contiguous relations2

(2n + o t 1) P,, " (A) = (n + o(+ 3) P,,"' (A) - (n + 3) P,('-', (A) (3a)

K and

(2n - (k+ 3) 1),," ' (A) = (n + u + i) P,4'H + (it + i)P'(A ,) (3b)

with P4'-" (Al I and P-1'((A) =0.

S Certain sums involving products of two Jacobi polynomials have been previ-ously evaluated (see, for example, Refs. 3 - 6). Our method for evaluating thesumn in Eq. 2 employs mathematical procedures analogous to those whichNoble' used to show that 6

*~ ~ ". M1ag[Ws, F. Oberhettinger. and R. P. Soni. Fojrmulas anfd rheoretsOfor the Special Fun(-,tions of Aathernatical Physics. Springer-Verlag. New York (1966).1. S. (iradshtevn and 1. M. Ry/hik, Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products, Alan Jeffrey,led , Academnic Press, Ness York (1965).11. [. %ianocha and B. I . Sharma. "Some Formulae for Jacobi PQlynornials," in Proc. cami,.Phil. So(., pp. 459-462 (1966).1I, 1 - Manocha and B. I . Sharnma. Geinerating Functions of Jacobi Polynomials," in Proc,('utnh. P'hil. Soc., pp. 431-433 (1966).

* II1. Noble, "'Some Dual Series Equations Ins ols'ing Jacobi Poly nornials.'' in Proc. ('arth. Phil.So(.. pp. 363-3*7I (1963).V.. R. Ian~en, A1 Table of Series and Products, F'rent ice- Hall. Ne%\ York I 1975).

Page 8: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

I HE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYLAUREL, MARYLAND

2''1(1 V) a(l +x) (x--y) +h -- IA(xy)

(a+ b-c) kPF(k+c+l)(2k+c+I) p( X ) P-,,. a (y) (4)-- ) r(k+a+l)r(k+b+l)

where

= I if -1 !; y < X ! 1

0 if I < x _< Y I

PROOF

The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and thenthe I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion of a function of twovariables in an infinite series of Jacobi polynomials of one variable and coeffi-cients that depend on the other variable. In particular, the coefficients in theexpansion are obtained by respresenting the Jacobi polynomial as a finite se-ries, evaluating the resulting elementary integrals, and re-summing the resul-tant series.

In proving Eq. 1, it is convenient to use the relationship

-- I +X) . (x) for n > 1 (6)

in order to write Eq. 2 as

*IF,..,._ - p (,-,,:. i (A)(2,u+ l)

(I+A) 2 (2k+,i+I+V)2 A) P(M A',(7)+ _ _ P A( "I / ':'* ( A ) -- k A _+ 1- ' ( A ) , (7 )8 k-I k(k+1)

where the first term is the k=0 term of the sum appearing in Eq. 2.

02

• .

Page 9: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYLAUEL, MARYL ANO

CASE OF 1 0For I = 0, we expand

(I+x)(I+Y) -(

= . C"(")(y) P, ( ), (8a)k=O

where

h xif y > xy if y < x. (8b)

Multiplying Eq. 8a by (1 +x)(i -x)') P,,' ' (x) and integrating from xI -to I yields

(m + 1)2p 5 /2C,"(

0 (y) 2 512

(m+u+3/2)(2m+p+5/2) -1+y)

x dx~l X) 'A+ : P (11+:' ( ) d ( - ) (p + 3/2)

+[ d(l AMp4~ W() [ t~ -rI-) ~ dl+ v(I -- v| P" 0

+~ ~ ~ ~ -dxx(x)" P,,),+ ' 2 ).)( -)(x) :dI

20(l+y) (+ V- -4 dx(I-x) - g + 'l"(x)

The integrals are readily evaluated by expanding the Jacobi polynomial as'

= -y (m,ao, 3;r)( ~x)r (10a)r =-

3

................................. (-)(') -)+:p...... .

Page 10: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYLAUREL. MARYLAND

with

r y(m,a,f3;r) r(af+m+lnr(af+(+m+r+I)(-1/)r/

integrating each term; and re-summing the series. In particular,

(m + 1)2"+5/2 -C,/()=(yV(+ '

(mn+ A+3/2)(2m+,u+5/2)

M -2 r4 -7 /2 2 1 +S/

2+I r+

.y~~p '',lr) (r+Mu+ 3 / 2 ) (r+ 1)

x-Y L+ I IM~ yr~~T

(r+ 1 (k+3/2))r=

x [ 2 r+PA+7/2 2-SVA(+ -Y) r+]

(r+1)(r+,u+3/2)

=-2A+/ (+y) (m + I+3/2)2 P M(++I h(l (y]

___________ _ (11)

where the fact that

* y(m + l,pA+ /,- l;r +1)=

-(m + j± + 3/2)2,y (mM + 11,l;r)/[2(r+)A+ 3/2)(r + 1))

is used to arrive at the next to the last line, and Eq. 6 is used in the final step.Inserting this result in Eq. 8a yields

4

........................................

Page 11: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

* APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYLAUREL. MARYLAND

2P ~~ (-w) -A")-H(0 ) (xy)=

(+y)(1+X) (+ 1)

(2k ++ 5 /2) P"P+ (V 4A ()(I2a)k=0 (k +1)2

or

2 'A +

\2A l 1-w/ (2 1A+l) 8

(2k +,u+ '2 ."y) (I2b)

k2 Pk,( Y) P_

with w defined by Eq. 8b. Since Po(")~ (A) = 1, comparing Eq. 7 with Io to Eq. 12b with x=y=A yields

_ ( )'+ ) (13)(2)A+1) ]-

which demonstrates that Eq. I holds for 1 0.

CAEFor 1 0, we consider

0for I : y 2) x-2t

H"' (x~v)r~p-+5/2) (I -+x y) - (A +3/2) (x-_y)]

fo f an ~x >y 1 (14)

Application of Leibnitz's rule for differentiating a product yields

I-I Y 1+1

W) (x,y) Es -(x-y)(15

5

Page 12: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYLAUREL. MARYLAND

with +1 = 3/2)P(,u+ t+3/2)r (1)) -y)r(A-I+5/2)r(t+2)r(t+ l)rI-t)

and U(x,y) I if 1 > x > y -1, and U(xy) =0 otherwise. The func-tion HUl) (xy) is expanded in terms of Jacobi polynomials

H~(I (xy) = CA!~ (Y) Pk;' '~ x (16)k=O

with the coefficients determined from

(m + 1) 9 1 5/

= H(")(xy) (x)I (lxPI+ )()dx

1-1 m= S, r,y(m, 14-1+11,1;r) dx( i -xyu-+ 12+r (Xy)1+l 1 (17)i=0 =O

The integral is evaluated by changing the variable from x to z M (x-y)l/(I -y),which leads to

m

J11)2 ~,MI ,1;r)(1 _Y),,/+ V,+r+ 2 r(l + r+ 3/2)r=O

, r(,u-+r+t+7/2) (8

Substituting for S, the inner summation appearing in Eq. 18 reduces to

(,+/)-I+512 _ rs+31 2+t )]

r~,)= (Mu-+/2)=1);-'+1 (-2r)

(1) 1(19)

For r + r2, we note that

6

Page 13: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

K THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYAPPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY

LAUREL. MARYLAND

u+/2 a-2- + V Z I- I

(Ma/)(l,+ aI (l) 0 for r 0.ar, (±-I+ 5/2) z'"11(20)

The derivative is zero at Z I because (I - 2 - r) < I1- 1. The fact that thederivative reproduces the series in Eq. 19 can be readily verified by writingthe factor (I - )-1as a polynomial in z, differentiating each term, and thensetting z= 1. For I < r +2, we note that

ds s. I ~S1 . + IS

(l)'-'r(Mu+ 5/2)r(r+ 1)

The multiple integral in Eq. 21 is readily evaluated by recalling that integra-tion by parts leads to

ds1 ... (1 -se (sjf(s 1 )dsl. (22)0 ~(j-l1)!

b The fact that the multiple integral reproduces the series in Eq. 19 can bereadily verified by writing (I - sj) '- as a polynomial in sj and integratingeach term separately. Inserting Eqs. 20 and 21 into Eq. 18 yields

()r ,+5/2) r=1

I(m,1) = r(1-1+r+312)r! for M - -r (MA+52+r) (r+ 1-1)!

0 otherwise. (23)

* .Form 2tI 1, using the definition of y(m,,u-4 I ,l2 ;r) and introducingthe indices r' -r--(I - 1) and m' =m-(I - 1) leads to

7

Page 14: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

* APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYLAUREL. MARYLAND

III') - __________

- min + A + /) r(4+ 5/2 -1

[(y- 1 )/2y r(in' +.u+l+ +r')

where the definition of -y(m-l+ 1, At+1+ V2, - l;r) was employed to obtainthe last line. Inserting Eqs. 23 and 24 into Eqs. 17 and 16 yields

- GA+ 3 12 'r(/L+5/2) (2m+ji-1+5/2)

~j - r(I+5,2-/) m=I-1 (m+l)(m+±+312)

X P,( J('/2 1-(y) P,,(A-1+'4'I)(X) (25)

Changing the summation index to m' = m - (I - 1), writing the m' =0 termseparately, and using Eq. 6 in both the mn' = 0 and the mn' d0 terms lead to

H(1) (x.y) ( P~+/)[(+.I() + (~)Iy)(l+x)r(,u+5/2 -1) L(2p+ 1) 8

(2XfM y (26)M, ' (in' + 1) rnIpM,+'.)xj

Setting x=y= A in Eq. 26 and comparing with Eq. 7, one finds

H (A1A 2 -)r ( +5/2) )F..f 0, 1 60 , (27)

where the vanishing of W)' (AA) follows directly from the form of Eq. 15.This completes the proof of Eq. 1.

8

Page 15: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYLAUREL.MARYLAND

dl REFERENCES

'W. Miagnus, F. Oberhettinger, and R. P. Soni, Formulas and Theoremnsforthe Special Functions of Mathematical Ph sics, Springer-Verlag, New York(1966).

21. S. Gradshteyn and 1. M. Ryzhik, Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products,Alan Jeffrey, ed., Academic Press, New York (1965).'H. L. Manocha and B. L. Sharma, "Some Formulae for Jacobi Polvnomi-als," in Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., pp. 459-462 (1966).

4 H. L. Manocha and B. L. Sharma, "Generating Functions of Jacobi Poly-nomials," in Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., pp. 43 1-433 (1966).

5 5B. Noble, "Some Dual Series Equations Involving Jacobi Polynomials, "inProc. Camb. Phil. Soc., pp. 363-371 (1963).

6 E. R. Hansen, A Table of Series and Products, Prentice-Hall, New York(1975).

9

Page 16: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

TH1E iOHNS H~OPKINS UNIVERSITY

APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORYL AL I MAR,rIANC

INITIAL DISTRIBUTION EXTERNAL TO THE APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY*tic sLrk repocd III I(' 0Sii'.I'doneuniirdc! N"'\ ( ,.ilrar~ N(x)i'i4 S ( 10I Ih '-1 l111d 11 1.4~ \", I'0111 id h' I I I

I oiniiind

ORGANIZATION LOCATION ATTENTION Copief

IM P ARI N T 0I ) I M \,\\I

W)1 PR AIl )NI ]I N11 41

()\I IRM I ORd XI

ENR'd "1 k' va~ 0 Pailouill", AX I kIL 1 e

4 1 \[\I RNI III

H ' lr ' I l. wol '' ~ r, 141111o. \11)k NOi

ti~~~I Il ii ii' Ii'ni i

R I I on'!r

* Requests for copies of this report from 000 activities and contractors should be directed to OTIC,Cameron Station, Alexandria. Virginia 22314 using OTIC Form 1 and, if necessary. DTIC Form 55.

'initial distribution of this document within the Applied Physics Laboratory has been made in accordance with aslist on tite in the APL Technical Publicatirns Group

Page 17: A KEONECKER KLTA.. CU) JOHNS HOPKINS UMY LAUREL … · The proof is done in two stages: first the I = 0 case is treated, and then the I e 0 case is analyzed. Both stages use the expansion

FILMED

12-85

* DTIC