19
711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek [email protected] http://suanpalm3.kmutnb.ac.th/teacher/andrea/

711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

711911 Groupware Technology and Team ManagementUnit 2

Dr. Andrea [email protected]

http://suanpalm3.kmutnb.ac.th/teacher/andrea/

Page 2: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Types of Collaboration Technology

Page 3: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Pros

Speeding up the exchange Easy access to new information Many people being able to receive information at the

same time Increase the number of potential participants in

discussions Expand contacts Easier reach people

Page 4: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Cons

High costs Technical limitations Low video quality Breakdowns Lack of user-friendliness Inadequate training

Page 5: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Consequences

Under-utilization of complex software

Rarely used for complex activities, e.g. co-authoring

“Even with prior coaching on the use of the software,

instructors and students require experience to understand and exploit the features“ …..White et al (1998)

Page 6: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Effects for groups and meetings

Use of computer assisted communication technologies and decision support technologies leads:

to a larger number and variety of people participating as information sources in the making of decisions

to a decrease in size and variety of face-to-face groups, since (some) experts can be consulted remotely.

to less of the organization’s time being absorbed by decision related meetings, since information exchange can also be done remotely and since decision support systems make meetings more effective

Page 7: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Effects on level and flexibility of decision making

Use of computer assisted communication technologies and decision support technologies leads:

to a more uniform distribution across organizational levels of the probability that a particular organizational level will make a particular decision

to a greater variation in the levels at which a particular type of decision will be taken

to fewer intermediate human nodes within the organizational information processing network, i e. from sensor units such as marketing, to decision makers, unless this implies information overload for the decision makers.

Page 8: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Effects for organizational memory

Use of computer assisted communication technologies and decision support technologies leads:

To a more frequent development and use of computer resident databases as components of organizational memory; this can substitute for knowledge loss because of personnel turnover, for information not being stored, or for information not being shared.

To more frequent development and use of in-house expert systems.

Page 9: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Effects on organizational learning, intelligence and decision making

Use of computer assisted communication technologies and decision support technologies leads:

to more rapid and more accurate identification of problems and opportunities, implying better organizational learning

to organizational intelligence that is more accurate, comprehensive, timely and available, resulting in higher quality decisions, although this may lead to lower quality decisions.

Page 10: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Power Distribution

Increased access to information may make employees more autonomous

This may result in a flattening of hierarchies

But: those in power may find this challenging

Page 11: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Example from Centra

Page 12: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

The Role of Technology in Society

Technological and Organisational Imperative

Contingency Perspective

Strategic Choice Perspective

Emergent Structures Perspective

Page 13: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Technological and Organisational Imperative Introduction of technology in our society and in organisations is

viewed as an independent and autonomous mechanism

This view ignore the manner in which technology is designed and developed

Page 14: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Contingency Perspective

Systems should match their environment to thrive and be effective

Effectiveness depends on task, the users, and the context

McKinsey’s 7-S model:strategy, structure, systems, style, staff, skills, superordinate goals

Page 15: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Cultural Variations

Page 16: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Cultural Dimensions according to Hofstede Power Distance

Individualism versus Collectivism

Masculinity versus Feminity

Uncertainty Avoidance

Long-term versus short term

Page 17: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Individual Cultures

People have more ingroups

People are not as attached to any single ingroup, because there are numerous ingroups to which they can be attached

Survival of the individuals and the society is more dependent on the successful and effective functioning of individuals rather than groups.

People make relatively fewer distinctions between ingroups and outgroups.

Page 18: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Collectivist Cultures

People have fewer ingroups.

People are very attached to the ingroups to which they belong.

Survival of the individuals and the society is more dependent on the success and effective functioning of the groups rather than individuals.

People make greater distinctions between ingroup and outgroup others.

Page 19: 711911 Groupware Technology and Team Management Unit 2 Dr. Andrea Jersabek ajersabek@gmail.com

Questions on Culture

Explain the following statement: “In studying other cultures, we do so very often from the perspective of our own culture.”

Explain how changes in technology, the new global economy, and the increases in the world’s population might affect you.

Explain how and why communication and culture are linked.

Explain the following statement: “When studying intercultural communication, you should be aware of the problems associated with individual uniqueness, stereotyping, and objectivity.”