75
Economic and Market Watch Report 3rd Quarter, 2010 *Click on a County to view economic and real estate information at the county and zip code level © 2010 North Texas Real Estate Information Systems, Inc. and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® Reproduction, reprinting, or retransmission in any form is prohibited without written permission.

3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Economic and Market Watch Report

3rd Quarter, 2010

*Click on a County to view economic and real estate information at the county and zip code level

© 2010 North Texas Real Estate Information Systems, Inc. andNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Reproduction, reprinting, or retransmission in any form is prohibited without writtenpermission.

Page 2: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

North Texas Real Estate Information Systems, Inc.

Index

North Texas Real Estate Information Systems, Inc. (NTREIS) is a real estate information and technology solution provider serving the real estate community in a coverage area exceeding 16,000 square miles in North Texas, including the Dallas Fort Worth Metropolitan Area.

NTREIS provides information management services to over 16,000 MLS subscribers of its 18 shareholder REALTOR Associations, including over 3,000 real estate offices.

In addition to its information management platform; NTREIS researches, develops and delivers various technology products and services through strategic alliances, utilizing a sales and distribution network which includes its shareholder REALTOR Associations.

Economic and Market Watch Report

Local ReportTexas

1 Anderson County .........................................................................................................2 Bosque County .............................................................................................................3 Callahan County ..........................................................................................................4 Cherokee County .........................................................................................................5 Coleman County ..........................................................................................................6 Collin County ...............................................................................................................8 Comanche County .......................................................................................................9 Cooke County ...............................................................................................................

10 Dallas County ...............................................................................................................13 Delta County ................................................................................................................14 Denton County .............................................................................................................16 Eastland County ..........................................................................................................17 Ellis County ..................................................................................................................19 Erath County ...............................................................................................................20 Fannin County .............................................................................................................22 Fisher County ...............................................................................................................23 Franklin County ..........................................................................................................24 Freestone County .........................................................................................................25 Grayson County ...........................................................................................................27 Hamilton County .........................................................................................................28 Haskell County .............................................................................................................29 Henderson County .......................................................................................................31 Hill County ...................................................................................................................32 Hood County ................................................................................................................33 Hopkins County ...........................................................................................................34 Hunt County .................................................................................................................36 Jack County .................................................................................................................

Page 3: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

37 Johnson County ...........................................................................................................39 Jones County ................................................................................................................40 Kaufman County .........................................................................................................42 Lamar County ..............................................................................................................43 Limestone County ........................................................................................................44 Montague County ........................................................................................................45 Navarro County ...........................................................................................................47 Nolan County ...............................................................................................................48 Palo Pinto County ........................................................................................................49 Parker County .............................................................................................................50 Rains County ................................................................................................................51 Rockwall County .........................................................................................................52 Shackelford County .....................................................................................................53 Smith County ...............................................................................................................55 Somervell County ........................................................................................................56 Stephens County ..........................................................................................................57 Tarrant County ............................................................................................................60 Taylor County ..............................................................................................................62 Upshur County .............................................................................................................63 Van Zandt County .......................................................................................................64 Wise County .................................................................................................................66 Wood County ...............................................................................................................67 Young County ..............................................................................................................

68 Others ...........................................................................................................................

69Trends ...............................................................................................................................................70Chief Economist's Commentary* ...................................................................................................72Economic Monitor* .........................................................................................................................

*Reprinted from Real Estate Outlook: Market Trends and Insights. ©2010 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ®.Used with permission. Reproduction, reprinting, or retransmission of this article in any form (electronic media included) is prohibited without permission. For subscription information please call 1-800-874-6500.

Page 4: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Anderson County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 3 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 9.5% in the second quarter to 9.8% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Anderson County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$81,000Average Price $757,100

15# Homes on the Market * 19

2# Homes Sold ** 1

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

45Avg # of Days on Market 191 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

OTHER $757,100 N/A 1 N/A 96.4%191

1

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 5: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Bosque County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 17 jobs were added to the payrolls of Bosque County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 8.6% during the second quarter to 8.6% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$116,200Average Price $139,400

152# Homes on the Market * 138

16# Homes Sold ** 16

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

150Avg # of Days on Market 121 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76634 $114,600 -27.47% 7 0.00% 95.2%11276652 $155,500 N/A 1 N/A 97.8%8076665 $500,000 329.18% 1 -66.67% 95.2%4476671 $124,700 129.65% 6 -14.29% 93.5%14076690 $25,000 N/A 1 N/A 66.0%191

2

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 6: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Callahan County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 5 jobs were added to the payrolls of Callahan County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 6.1% during the second quarter to 6.1% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$114,900Average Price $101,400

86# Homes on the Market * 73

23# Homes Sold ** 30

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

82Avg # of Days on Market 97 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76443 $45,000 -30.77% 1 0.00% 81.8%1779504 $88,400 -2.32% 5 150.00% 91.5%13179510 $102,900 2.90% 22 22.22% 95.6%97

OTHER $145,800 -6.54% 2 100.00% 97.2%68

3

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 7: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Cherokee County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 232 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 9.1% in the second quarter to 9.4% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Cherokee County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

NAAverage Price $240,000

NA# Homes on the Market * 8

NA# Homes Sold ** 1

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

NAAvg # of Days on Market 27 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75766 $240,000 N/A 1 N/A 92.7%27

4

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 8: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Coleman County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 17 jobs were added to the payrolls of Coleman County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.2% during the second quarter to 7.1% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$35,000Average Price $192,200

9# Homes on the Market * 15

1# Homes Sold ** 2

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

10Avg # of Days on Market 145 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76834 $192,200 N/A 2 N/A 94.9%145

5

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 9: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Collin County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 979 jobs in Collin County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 7.7% for the second quarter to 7.8% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$237,700Average Price $242,300

6,342# Homes on the Market * 5,958

3,338# Homes Sold ** 2,406

1,186# New Homes Built *** 685 ***

64Avg # of Days on Market 70 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75002 $230,400 9.61% 182 -26.61% 97.1%6175009 $214,300 -5.34% 23 9.52% 96.7%7875013 $331,300 0.24% 130 -20.73% 95.1%8275023 $179,200 2.17% 110 -31.68% 97.0%5775024 $285,500 0.49% 80 -25.93% 95.8%6675025 $255,200 6.64% 133 -34.16% 97.5%5775034 $354,600 -11.15% 71 -26.04% 95.8%8775035 $231,300 4.47% 188 -40.88% 96.2%59

6

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 10: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Collin County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75069 $223,800 11.79% 72 -13.25% 95.1%8775070 $240,100 4.94% 353 -29.82% 96.8%6775071 $225,300 11.65% 164 -12.30% 96.0%8375074 $142,900 -7.33% 91 -25.41% 97.1%5775075 $182,400 2.07% 84 -18.45% 97.7%6475078 $382,300 1.62% 59 -14.49% 97.3%9675093 $403,800 4.13% 115 -22.82% 96.4%7475094 $290,000 7.73% 65 -28.57% 96.3%6575098 $172,500 9.59% 113 -33.14% 96.6%7575164 $78,200 N/A 6 N/A 88.8%14175166 $213,800 40.01% 8 -57.89% 95.4%10575173 $112,800 -24.85% 10 -33.33% 95.5%5975252 $257,500 2.88% 61 -15.28% 95.9%9375287 $292,900 0.86% 29 -47.27% 94.3%7175407 $100,800 -12.65% 41 -10.87% 96.4%6675409 $129,200 0.54% 40 -24.53% 98.5%9175424 $73,900 -39.38% 8 14.29% 92.1%8575442 $105,300 -18.62% 14 -12.50% 93.6%9075454 $177,700 -10.75% 36 50.00% 98.1%76

OTHER $243,000 5.79% 120 -6.25% 96.7%61

7

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 11: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Comanche County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 19 jobs were added to the payrolls of Comanche County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 6.8% during the second quarter to 6.8% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$138,600Average Price $207,400

95# Homes on the Market * 86

15# Homes Sold ** 22

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

125Avg # of Days on Market 124 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76442 $214,300 66.64% 21 23.53% 87.3%12476455 $64,000 -51.26% 1 -50.00% 85.4%130

8

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 12: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Cooke County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 39 jobs in Cooke County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.7% for the second quarter to 6.8% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$169,800Average Price $190,100

366# Homes on the Market * 340

94# Homes Sold ** 65

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

89Avg # of Days on Market 117 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76238 $600,500 N/A 2 N/A 98.8%32876240 $166,800 -10.13% 49 -23.44% 93.8%11776252 $165,000 -12.88% 2 -60.00% 97.1%6376272 $218,100 53.38% 10 0.00% 93.7%83

OTHER $237,000 5.33% 2 100.00% 91.3%147

9

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 13: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Dallas County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 2,728 jobs in Dallas County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.8% for the second quarter to 8.9% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$222,200Average Price $229,800

13,585# Homes on the Market * 13,183

5,879# Homes Sold ** 3,971

785# New Homes Built *** 527 ***

72Avg # of Days on Market 79 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75001 $218,800 -10.98% 28 21.74% 96.4%6975006 $143,600 -0.21% 72 -33.33% 97.0%6875019 $322,200 10.80% 119 -11.85% 96.4%5775038 $333,800 50.63% 16 -42.86% 94.9%14375039 $387,200 25.43% 28 27.27% 94.3%16775040 $107,200 3.47% 98 -33.78% 96.3%7275041 $83,200 -11.02% 54 3.85% 94.7%5975042 $92,400 -1.70% 45 -39.19% 96.9%64

10

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 14: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Dallas County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75043 $110,900 -8.87% 121 -27.98% 96.0%8075044 $175,500 12.36% 85 -27.35% 95.5%8975048 $176,800 -7.34% 35 -35.19% 95.9%6975050 $95,500 7.42% 34 -8.11% 95.1%7275051 $76,500 -18.96% 40 -13.04% 96.9%5375052 $113,700 -2.99% 107 -28.19% 98.7%6275054 $170,000 -16.83% 1 -50.00% 89.5%17875060 $91,100 -16.50% 43 -29.51% 94.6%7975061 $90,600 -20.32% 41 -44.59% 97.1%7275062 $126,200 3.36% 68 0.00% 96.4%6875063 $283,400 8.75% 73 -13.10% 96.4%7875080 $188,600 8.89% 80 -36.51% 96.4%4875081 $147,600 -6.05% 59 -29.76% 96.3%4775082 $188,000 -14.19% 8 33.33% 94.5%8275088 $147,300 16.72% 60 -15.49% 96.8%6075089 $153,200 -8.48% 75 -42.75% 97.4%6975104 $143,300 -4.34% 110 -36.78% 97.4%6575115 $120,400 -8.72% 109 -34.34% 97.1%7875116 $93,800 -12.34% 26 -27.78% 95.5%8075134 $83,200 -0.95% 49 6.52% 98.4%4475137 $106,700 -5.41% 42 -31.15% 97.0%7475141 $58,500 -4.72% 4 -20.00% 96.1%5975146 $96,500 3.76% 43 -28.33% 96.1%9275149 $65,300 -20.94% 78 -49.35% 95.9%6375150 $80,300 -11.95% 94 -18.97% 96.1%6475159 $82,600 2.99% 22 -26.67% 98.9%7275172 $63,300 -17.79% 2 0.00% 89.8%5275180 $60,800 -8.71% 30 -33.33% 97.3%5875181 $125,000 -3.62% 65 -8.45% 96.4%6475182 $306,300 -14.15% 16 -20.00% 96.7%11275201 $1,023,800 91.62% 22 -46.34% 98.3%7175202 $189,800 41.43% 6 100.00% 97.9%8375203 $101,000 -36.88% 6 -50.00% 96.6%7175204 $284,800 18.77% 38 -42.42% 95.7%11075205 $1,040,600 9.63% 78 -6.02% 94.5%14275206 $316,600 9.55% 86 -20.37% 96.2%92

11

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 15: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Dallas County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75208 $247,100 -5.33% 52 10.64% 96.1%8875209 $586,300 35.97% 49 -12.50% 92.7%8275211 $79,600 -17.51% 51 -19.05% 96.4%4275212 $104,800 25.21% 6 -60.00% 99.4%3575214 $354,600 -8.84% 118 -19.73% 95.9%8975215 $62,900 -3.53% 7 40.00% 96.3%6475216 $36,800 -26.69% 25 8.70% 97.2%5275217 $59,800 3.28% 72 -51.35% 99.9%6175218 $266,100 6.87% 52 -49.02% 95.0%10175219 $324,400 5.36% 102 -6.42% 95.1%12475220 $451,900 -3.93% 33 -38.89% 96.3%11575223 $160,700 -30.88% 5 -78.26% 97.0%7075224 $73,600 -28.54% 37 -2.63% 94.4%5375225 $988,500 0.46% 94 17.50% 94.7%13875226 $330,000 96.43% 1 0.00% 91.7%6175227 $73,300 5.01% 68 -26.88% 95.8%7075228 $101,300 -2.22% 99 -30.77% 95.8%6375229 $412,500 -0.41% 70 -32.69% 95.1%8675230 $574,500 9.49% 103 -0.96% 94.0%13175231 $245,500 12.10% 32 -33.33% 97.7%6375232 $56,600 -13.19% 34 -37.04% 97.1%8275233 $79,600 -9.55% 22 -15.38% 98.2%4375234 $144,800 -5.30% 60 -21.05% 96.0%5975235 $114,400 -40.39% 14 -6.67% 96.0%9175236 $107,900 -12.56% 14 -22.22% 98.9%4075237 $89,000 16.19% 11 10.00% 98.8%5775238 $260,700 6.36% 54 -28.95% 96.6%5775240 $289,300 86.28% 27 28.57% 94.7%10575241 $62,800 9.79% 47 -12.96% 98.1%6175243 $156,700 -6.56% 53 -43.01% 96.6%8575244 $262,200 9.48% 32 -8.57% 94.8%13175248 $355,800 15.63% 81 -26.36% 95.3%7275249 $101,900 5.16% 33 -31.25% 98.9%7275253 $81,500 -2.28% 15 -25.00% 96.6%8975254 $261,800 36.21% 24 -53.85% 93.3%112

OTHER $146,900 4.26% 58 -14.71% 97.8%112

12

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 16: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Delta County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 6 jobs in Delta County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.2% for the second quarter to 9% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$101,100Average Price $141,500

46# Homes on the Market * 48

10# Homes Sold ** 4

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

196Avg # of Days on Market 140 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75432 $148,600 35.96% 3 -50.00% 93.7%8175469 $120,000 N/A 1 N/A 75.0%317

13

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 17: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Denton County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 832 jobs in Denton County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 7.4% for the second quarter to 7.7% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$220,300Average Price $234,900

5,507# Homes on the Market * 5,208

2,911# Homes Sold ** 1,848

343# New Homes Built *** 227 ***

66Avg # of Days on Market 72 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75007 $169,000 -6.78% 85 -41.38% 97.1%5975010 $225,000 -0.97% 44 -45.68% 95.8%6275022 $379,000 3.67% 97 4.30% 97.2%8075028 $265,200 3.96% 151 -34.91% 97.8%5275034 $329,700 9.17% 246 -21.41% 96.3%8275056 $229,800 14.90% 148 -15.43% 95.6%5375057 $161,100 36.99% 5 -68.75% 97.7%7775065 $393,800 146.74% 30 -18.92% 98.8%62

14

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 18: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Denton County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75067 $153,700 5.78% 80 -50.31% 96.9%7275068 $164,800 -4.30% 144 -30.43% 97.1%6575077 $248,700 8.13% 102 -34.19% 96.4%6276201 $118,200 -9.49% 24 -14.29% 95.5%5376205 $173,500 -5.35% 26 -10.34% 97.0%5176207 $174,800 9.32% 33 37.50% 95.7%11376208 $209,300 2.40% 37 -35.09% 97.5%7476209 $114,000 0.26% 59 -20.27% 97.8%8476210 $178,500 2.00% 122 -37.44% 97.9%7076226 $334,700 1.03% 79 -3.66% 95.7%11076227 $168,800 18.12% 83 -27.19% 96.0%6576247 $140,400 -60.69% 39 -17.02% 96.8%8976249 $168,200 28.20% 17 -26.09% 95.9%9876258 $179,100 -24.24% 15 -6.25% 95.9%10176259 $179,300 33.21% 11 10.00% 97.5%7276262 $300,500 19.53% 71 -6.58% 94.9%7476266 $113,500 -16.91% 29 -34.09% 96.1%72

OTHER $231,000 -16.09% 71 -25.26% 94.2%97

15

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 19: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Eastland County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 68 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.4% in the second quarter to 8.5% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Eastland County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$140,200Average Price $94,000

122# Homes on the Market * 121

16# Homes Sold ** 30

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

151Avg # of Days on Market 220 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76435 $189,300 N/A 3 N/A 96.0%39576437 $83,100 -11.12% 9 800.00% 95.4%20076445 $125,000 N/A 1 N/A 96.2%33076448 $80,200 -23.03% 11 -21.43% 93.1%16876466 $61,000 N/A 1 N/A 81.3%2476470 $87,500 -23.91% 5 400.00% 89.2%285

16

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 20: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Ellis County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 169 jobs in Ellis County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.3% for the second quarter to 8.8% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$157,700Average Price $159,800

1,108# Homes on the Market * 1,099

411# Homes Sold ** 341

138# New Homes Built *** 86 ***

88Avg # of Days on Market 96 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75101 $27,500 N/A 1 N/A 78.6%16775119 $116,600 -2.10% 38 18.75% 91.4%8975125 $55,400 -60.82% 7 133.33% 95.2%16775152 $85,700 -4.35% 10 66.67% 95.5%10175154 $148,200 12.53% 74 5.71% 95.7%10575165 $150,100 13.03% 91 -11.65% 95.9%9775167 $216,100 30.57% 23 35.29% 97.5%8576041 $35,000 -84.64% 1 0.00% 100.0%1776064 $126,000 -15.72% 7 40.00% 96.4%60

17

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 21: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Ellis County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76065 $206,700 14.07% 76 -37.70% 96.1%8776651 $164,800 -19.02% 7 75.00% 90.8%115

OTHER $237,500 -9.32% 6 -40.00% 92.8%141

18

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 22: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Erath County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 555 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.4% in the second quarter to 7% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Erath County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$156,000Average Price $152,900

379# Homes on the Market * 375

93# Homes Sold ** 52

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

116Avg # of Days on Market 112 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76401 $147,300 -2.39% 44 -41.33% 94.2%9576433 $249,500 113.98% 3 0.00% 95.9%17676446 $144,400 62.98% 5 -61.54% 87.5%228

19

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 23: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Fannin County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 50 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 9.4% in the second quarter to 9.7% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Fannin County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$104,900Average Price $114,000

377# Homes on the Market * 335

49# Homes Sold ** 52

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

86Avg # of Days on Market 118 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75418 $77,100 -20.43% 21 -36.36% 91.0%10275438 $51,400 N/A 1 N/A 97.0%9875439 $180,000 373.68% 1 0.00% 90.2%11675446 $89,600 7.95% 4 0.00% 89.0%11075447 $215,000 124.43% 1 -66.67% 93.9%12275449 $222,000 362.50% 1 0.00% 103.3%14675452 $151,200 26.11% 11 22.22% 93.6%14275475 $48,900 N/A 1 N/A 98.0%421

20

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 24: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Fannin County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75479 $101,700 N/A 3 N/A 98.4%7475488 $447,500 436.57% 1 0.00% 90.4%47375490 $91,500 -35.65% 4 -33.33% 91.2%4775492 $149,300 N/A 2 N/A 90.5%97

OTHER $155,000 -3.13% 1 0.00% 93.9%24

21

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 25: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Fisher County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 15 jobs in Fisher County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.7% for the second quarter to 6.7% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

NAAverage Price $37,700

NA# Homes on the Market * 1

NA# Homes Sold ** 1

NA# New Homes Built *** 0 ***

NAAvg # of Days on Market 55 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

79546 $37,700 N/A 1 N/A 91.0%55

22

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 26: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Franklin County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 77 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 7.5% in the second quarter to 7.8% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Franklin County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$59,400Average Price $163,500

42# Homes on the Market * 37

7# Homes Sold ** 2

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

79Avg # of Days on Market 77 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75480 $68,000 -82.37% 1 -50.00% 85.0%112OTHER $259,000 793.10% 1 -66.67% 97.4%42

23

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 27: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Freestone County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 124 jobs were added to the payrolls of Freestone County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 6.8% during the second quarter to 6.8% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$115,000Average Price $192,300

85# Homes on the Market * 99

22# Homes Sold ** 15

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

162Avg # of Days on Market 126 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75840 $106,400 -19.70% 6 -33.33% 92.9%6575859 $529,500 110.70% 3 0.00% 90.6%21875860 $106,500 50.85% 5 0.00% 94.0%122

OTHER $125,000 N/A 1 N/A 86.9%239

24

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 28: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Grayson County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 387 jobs in Grayson County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.5% for the second quarter to 8.6% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$132,000Average Price $121,500

1,211# Homes on the Market * 1,191

304# Homes Sold ** 233

3# New Homes Built *** 1 ***

111Avg # of Days on Market 96 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75020 $94,500 -11.76% 44 -6.38% 93.7%7475021 $102,100 -32.02% 2 -83.33% 98.8%3675076 $143,300 3.47% 35 45.83% 94.9%13675090 $85,800 -20.19% 34 9.68% 95.3%6875092 $150,700 14.86% 46 -22.03% 91.4%7975414 $99,300 -41.90% 4 -42.86% 92.6%15975459 $130,000 -0.84% 9 -25.00% 96.9%17175489 $76,500 -44.40% 2 0.00% 91.1%154

25

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 29: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Grayson County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75491 $82,200 -54.38% 8 33.33% 96.6%8275495 $140,700 4.61% 14 -12.50% 94.1%9476233 $66,200 -39.87% 5 -44.44% 91.2%15276245 $100,900 -28.99% 4 -33.33% 96.8%22376264 $137,200 6.36% 4 300.00% 97.9%4976271 $94,200 -40.38% 3 -25.00% 99.4%10876273 $167,400 36.10% 19 5.56% 98.0%93

26

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 30: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Hamilton County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 44 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.5% in the second quarter to 6.6% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Hamilton County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$96,200Average Price $59,900

55# Homes on the Market * 53

5# Homes Sold ** 1

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

147Avg # of Days on Market 609 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76457 $59,900 -52.19% 1 -75.00% 75.0%609

27

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 31: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Haskell County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 55 jobs were added to the payrolls of Haskell County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 5.2% during the second quarter to 5.1% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

NAAverage Price $150,000

NA# Homes on the Market * 2

NA# Homes Sold ** 1

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

NAAvg # of Days on Market 0 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

79539 $150,000 N/A 1 N/A 100.0%0

28

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 32: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Henderson County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 230 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.6% in the second quarter to 8.9% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Henderson County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$192,900Average Price $195,100

523# Homes on the Market * 495

72# Homes Sold ** 73

5# New Homes Built *** 12 ***

124Avg # of Days on Market 115 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75124 $134,200 N/A 3 N/A 96.9%4975148 $130,300 -77.49% 6 100.00% 90.9%4975156 $237,200 96.68% 27 8.00% 94.2%10275163 $178,500 -20.03% 4 -20.00% 96.5%14975751 $189,000 10.33% 15 -25.00% 94.1%14875752 $169,500 -2.02% 5 -28.57% 93.9%14075758 $183,500 80.79% 2 100.00% 94.2%10575770 $282,000 N/A 1 N/A 94.3%30

29

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 33: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Henderson County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75782 $56,500 N/A 1 N/A 95.8%51OTHER $172,000 -9.28% 9 -10.00% 92.3%160

30

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 34: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Hill County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 36 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.3% in the second quarter to 8.4% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Hill County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$118,300Average Price $117,600

318# Homes on the Market * 322

56# Homes Sold ** 51

1# New Homes Built *** -1 ***

166Avg # of Days on Market 134 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76055 $129,300 -11.32% 3 0.00% 94.7%14576621 $89,600 N/A 1 N/A 99.7%30976627 $121,000 62.42% 4 300.00% 95.8%5976628 $25,000 N/A 1 N/A 83.6%14676645 $84,300 -9.06% 10 -16.67% 93.1%14676648 $89,100 N/A 2 N/A 95.5%35076692 $129,900 -8.71% 28 -3.45% 92.0%122

OTHER $176,500 82.15% 2 100.00% 97.1%75

31

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 35: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Hood County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 114 jobs were added to the payrolls of Hood County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.3% during the second quarter to 7.2% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$207,600Average Price $176,100

823# Homes on the Market * 795

256# Homes Sold ** 187

4# New Homes Built *** 0 ***

118Avg # of Days on Market 114 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76035 $39,900 42.50% 1 0.00% 100.0%18076048 $168,600 15.88% 76 33.33% 94.0%11276049 $181,900 -12.08% 100 -28.57% 95.7%11376462 $125,600 -29.99% 6 200.00% 95.4%12876476 $281,600 66.63% 4 100.00% 91.3%160

32

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 36: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Hopkins County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 35 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.7% in the second quarter to 6.9% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Hopkins County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$128,300Average Price $118,400

222# Homes on the Market * 204

48# Homes Sold ** 61

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

122Avg # of Days on Market 110 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75431 $63,000 -10.26% 4 100.00% 83.2%30575433 $111,200 N/A 2 N/A 94.7%14375471 $68,500 9.60% 1 0.00% 97.9%17575482 $125,000 11.31% 53 20.45% 94.3%95

OTHER $54,000 N/A 1 N/A 98.2%37

33

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 37: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Hunt County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 88 jobs in Hunt County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.6% for the second quarter to 9% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$115,200Average Price $117,400

674# Homes on the Market * 662

196# Homes Sold ** 166

11# New Homes Built *** 8 ***

91Avg # of Days on Market 90 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75135 $117,900 -25.19% 12 9.09% 98.9%6475401 $83,400 -3.47% 22 4.76% 91.0%14875402 $118,500 0.85% 40 33.33% 95.5%8275422 $201,000 43.57% 3 200.00% 93.5%7375423 $206,400 105.58% 3 0.00% 76.0%6175428 $148,600 95.01% 13 -13.33% 93.5%7075453 $99,200 -45.70% 11 83.33% 94.3%5975474 $90,300 -20.93% 31 10.71% 90.9%8275496 $106,900 47.04% 6 20.00% 92.4%94

34

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 38: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Hunt County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

OTHER $152,600 16.49% 25 -19.35% 93.7%104

35

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 39: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Jack County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 122 jobs were added to the payrolls of Jack County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 5.8% during the second quarter to 5.7% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$105,400Average Price $70,100

23# Homes on the Market * 24

5# Homes Sold ** 5

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

105Avg # of Days on Market 123 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76427 $49,300 N/A 2 N/A 92.1%5676458 $53,500 -9.01% 2 100.00% 87.7%160

OTHER $145,000 N/A 1 N/A 93.5%188

36

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 40: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Johnson County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 79 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.5% in the second quarter to 8.5% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Johnson County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$117,300Average Price $115,700

1,061# Homes on the Market * 1,038

420# Homes Sold ** 316

116# New Homes Built *** 73 ***

83Avg # of Days on Market 81 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76009 $64,300 -29.96% 35 -18.60% 97.3%7376028 $154,700 12.10% 112 -19.42% 97.0%9076031 $115,000 14.89% 13 -31.58% 92.4%10776033 $114,800 10.92% 59 -11.94% 97.1%5876044 $43,200 -64.65% 4 -63.64% 76.7%10876050 $102,500 -32.34% 10 25.00% 97.1%11976058 $92,100 -5.15% 53 12.77% 98.1%7176059 $54,400 -44.88% 4 -60.00% 96.9%69

37

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 41: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Johnson County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76084 $78,100 8.32% 13 0.00% 86.6%8476093 $93,100 -19.18% 4 0.00% 90.2%80

OTHER $115,600 -43.69% 9 -30.77% 94.1%126

38

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 42: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Jones County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 6 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.3% in the second quarter to 8.4% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Jones County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$117,400Average Price $83,600

66# Homes on the Market * 66

14# Homes Sold ** 14

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

90Avg # of Days on Market 57 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

79501 $70,000 100.00% 5 400.00% 96.0%6379520 $45,900 11.14% 2 0.00% 87.0%6179525 $119,700 32.71% 5 -16.67% 98.4%46

OTHER $65,000 -18.65% 2 100.00% 86.8%73

39

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 43: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Kaufman County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 111 jobs in Kaufman County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 9.1% for the second quarter to 9.4% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$134,000Average Price $132,900

958# Homes on the Market * 924

319# Homes Sold ** 246

45# New Homes Built *** 30 ***

91Avg # of Days on Market 87 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75114 $101,000 -33.07% 22 120.00% 99.0%8475126 $160,400 -0.80% 123 -19.08% 97.3%9175142 $111,700 -2.19% 31 -26.19% 94.0%14075143 $77,700 -29.94% 9 -40.00% 95.7%4275147 $65,000 -56.67% 6 500.00% 97.6%4475158 $70,700 -53.94% 5 -16.67% 96.2%7675160 $103,700 9.27% 34 -33.33% 94.7%6275161 $111,800 14.90% 12 0.00% 94.2%64

40

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 44: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Kaufman County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

OTHER $241,600 68.60% 4 0.00% 91.0%58

41

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 45: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Lamar County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 71 jobs were added to the payrolls of Lamar County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 8.9% during the second quarter to 8.9% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$131,400Average Price $117,400

125# Homes on the Market * 130

31# Homes Sold ** 24

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

118Avg # of Days on Market 93 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75460 $94,000 -3.09% 8 -11.11% 91.3%12275462 $116,900 -24.29% 11 -31.25% 94.6%8475468 $145,000 N/A 1 N/A 96.7%3075473 $194,700 181.77% 3 50.00% 95.8%6875486 $50,500 -78.51% 1 0.00% 93.5%94

42

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 46: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Limestone County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 8 jobs in Limestone County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.9% for the second quarter to 7.1% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

NAAverage Price $46,000

NA# Homes on the Market * 20

NA# Homes Sold ** 2

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

NAAvg # of Days on Market 64 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76667 $46,000 -47.31% 2 0.00% 89.0%65

43

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 47: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Montague County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 7 jobs were added to the payrolls of Montague County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.2% during the second quarter to 7.1% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$84,600Average Price $174,900

77# Homes on the Market * 69

10# Homes Sold ** 11

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

148Avg # of Days on Market 135 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76230 $145,000 164.12% 1 -88.89% 98.7%6276251 $50,000 -21.88% 1 0.00% 100.0%9476255 $124,300 16.82% 2 -60.00% 96.0%21976265 $290,000 312.52% 2 0.00% 87.3%2476270 $180,100 212.67% 5 150.00% 85.5%170

44

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 48: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Navarro County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 270 jobs in Navarro County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 9.2% for the second quarter to 9.5% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$155,900Average Price $129,900

413# Homes on the Market * 402

100# Homes Sold ** 64

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

130Avg # of Days on Market 108 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75102 $90,600 N/A 3 N/A 96.3%8675109 $232,400 27.13% 9 12.50% 95.6%20575110 $101,900 -2.30% 40 -20.00% 92.8%9375144 $286,000 N/A 1 N/A 88.0%3575155 $45,100 -11.57% 2 -33.33% 86.8%6276626 $152,500 N/A 2 N/A 93.0%21076641 $35,200 -14.77% 1 -50.00% 91.4%3576679 $123,300 N/A 3 N/A 94.4%35

45

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 49: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Navarro County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76681 $52,000 N/A 1 N/A 74.4%93OTHER $367,500 4.85% 2 0.00% 93.6%178

46

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 50: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Nolan County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 68 jobs were added to the payrolls of Nolan County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.2% during the second quarter to 7.1% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$58,100Average Price $192,100

10# Homes on the Market * 11

2# Homes Sold ** 3

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

41Avg # of Days on Market 108 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

79556 $192,100 N/A 3 N/A 90.3%109

47

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 51: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Palo Pinto County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 49 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 7.9% in the second quarter to 8.2% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Palo Pinto County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$263,600Average Price $179,100

401# Homes on the Market * 364

80# Homes Sold ** 72

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

172Avg # of Days on Market 109 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76067 $94,600 -22.65% 29 3.57% 93.5%7076449 $267,700 -29.79% 23 -14.81% 92.0%10476453 $54,800 -65.43% 3 50.00% 73.2%23276472 $63,500 57.96% 2 0.00% 91.4%13676475 $147,500 -62.54% 3 -40.00% 88.6%20176484 $125,500 25.50% 2 100.00% 86.3%89

OTHER $300,800 98.55% 10 233.33% 98.7%168

48

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 52: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Parker County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 57 jobs were added to the payrolls of Parker County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.9% during the second quarter to 7.8% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$177,800Average Price $186,400

1,314# Homes on the Market * 1,259

410# Homes Sold ** 292

36# New Homes Built *** 29 ***

102Avg # of Days on Market 90 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76008 $261,100 -1.36% 47 -25.40% 96.9%8376066 $610,000 271.27% 1 -66.67% 78.2%1976082 $126,400 38.60% 41 -29.31% 96.6%9176085 $220,300 30.98% 22 -47.62% 94.9%8976086 $113,600 -1.30% 36 -29.41% 94.8%9176087 $197,200 -10.77% 86 -4.44% 96.5%8776088 $163,000 -12.37% 22 -4.35% 97.7%8776487 $168,400 -44.97% 2 0.00% 99.1%43

OTHER $186,900 -15.31% 35 -23.91% 96.5%118

49

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 53: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Rains County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 104 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 9.4% in the second quarter to 9.6% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Rains County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$103,500Average Price $133,900

96# Homes on the Market * 86

15# Homes Sold ** 15

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

121Avg # of Days on Market 111 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75440 $117,100 36.96% 6 -53.85% 89.2%15575472 $150,100 70.18% 8 14.29% 94.8%73

OTHER $105,000 -47.58% 1 -66.67% 95.9%163

50

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 54: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Rockwall County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 92 jobs were added to the payrolls of Rockwall County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 7.6% during the second quarter to 7.6% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$213,300Average Price $241,100

937# Homes on the Market * 871

380# Homes Sold ** 298

134# New Homes Built *** 55 ***

78Avg # of Days on Market 87 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75032 $326,500 17.03% 119 -19.05% 96.4%10775087 $200,900 3.72% 117 -8.59% 94.6%7375132 $208,500 14.06% 2 -66.67% 95.6%1875189 $123,400 -9.80% 41 -25.45% 94.6%81

OTHER $212,100 22.89% 19 -53.66% 96.6%72

51

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 55: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Shackelford County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 4 jobs in Shackelford County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 4.4% for the second quarter to 5% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$99,300Average Price $57,500

5# Homes on the Market * 2

4# Homes Sold ** 1

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

157Avg # of Days on Market 17 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76430 $57,500 N/A 1 N/A 96.0%17

52

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 56: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Smith County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 302 jobs in Smith County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 7.7% for the second quarter to 7.9% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$207,900Average Price $197,800

239# Homes on the Market * 243

45# Homes Sold ** 40

34# New Homes Built *** 19 ***

96Avg # of Days on Market 130 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75701 $131,000 -27.50% 1 -80.00% 100.8%35775703 $451,800 13.06% 4 -50.00% 91.5%5175704 $40,000 N/A 1 N/A 72.7%4575706 $143,000 -20.86% 1 0.00% 79.4%12475707 $214,500 -14.13% 6 200.00% 94.4%11875757 $265,000 -40.42% 4 100.00% 90.0%27975762 $152,700 N/A 2 N/A 98.0%7275771 $151,800 -13.60% 18 -25.00% 97.3%135

53

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 57: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Smith County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75791 $95,000 -29.63% 2 100.00% 96.4%9OTHER $218,000 N/A 1 N/A 97.1%92

54

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 58: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Somervell County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 19 jobs in Somervell County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8% for the second quarter to 8.3% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$171,700Average Price $227,400

89# Homes on the Market * 103

18# Homes Sold ** 9

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

70Avg # of Days on Market 173 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76043 $267,700 -0.07% 6 -40.00% 86.2%15576070 $282,000 186.29% 1 -50.00% 97.6%174

OTHER $79,500 N/A 2 N/A 91.4%231

55

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 59: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Stephens County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 69 jobs in Stephens County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 7% for the second quarter to 7.1% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$285,900Average Price $63,300

21# Homes on the Market * 25

3# Homes Sold ** 2

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

150Avg # of Days on Market 122 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76424 $63,300 -49.36% 2 100.00% 87.3%123

56

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 60: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Tarrant County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 951 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.3% in the second quarter to 8.5% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Tarrant County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$177,100Average Price $191,200

12,154# Homes on the Market * 11,526

5,589# Homes Sold ** 3,970

1,181# New Homes Built *** 613 ***

69Avg # of Days on Market 74 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76001 $151,800 7.97% 91 -19.47% 97.5%6276002 $136,100 0.07% 83 -36.64% 97.5%7076006 $156,700 -0.19% 22 -24.14% 96.2%10376010 $64,400 0.47% 49 -37.97% 96.8%9976011 $133,000 30.78% 17 -22.73% 95.1%8576012 $166,600 -3.36% 44 -15.38% 95.2%7076013 $138,100 1.17% 54 -37.93% 95.8%6576014 $74,100 -7.26% 44 -15.38% 97.0%50

57

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 61: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Tarrant County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76015 $98,300 -6.20% 23 -47.73% 96.8%7076016 $166,500 -1.77% 73 -27.72% 93.6%5476017 $151,800 3.83% 112 -17.65% 96.5%7576018 $104,300 -1.79% 53 -34.57% 96.7%5276020 $146,500 -4.87% 32 -37.25% 95.4%6476021 $184,700 2.55% 75 -27.88% 97.6%5776022 $116,200 -5.76% 22 -29.03% 97.5%7176034 $504,700 4.82% 100 4.17% 96.8%9976036 $130,500 11.92% 56 -26.32% 96.8%10076039 $152,500 -10.77% 51 -43.33% 96.8%4976040 $140,000 -8.08% 38 -33.33% 95.8%6476051 $249,700 -4.55% 110 -15.38% 96.4%6276052 $200,100 1.11% 79 -22.55% 97.6%8676053 $116,500 -4.35% 50 -39.02% 95.9%5976054 $179,500 -8.32% 32 -27.27% 97.8%8176060 $231,700 13.91% 8 -57.89% 96.4%6176063 $206,300 10.74% 188 -20.00% 96.7%7776092 $621,200 5.52% 123 -6.11% 96.4%7776102 $436,700 52.91% 9 0.00% 97.4%10176103 $82,000 -10.28% 13 -50.00% 94.0%5576104 $123,100 -2.84% 9 -18.18% 94.9%6176105 $32,100 -14.40% 7 -63.16% 98.4%10376106 $48,200 -4.37% 13 -13.33% 97.2%4576107 $400,800 40.29% 65 -24.42% 94.1%10676108 $138,600 25.20% 81 -31.93% 96.5%9176109 $318,500 15.44% 75 -9.64% 95.1%8776110 $181,700 6.82% 34 -42.37% 96.0%7076111 $60,500 -15.27% 18 -40.00% 97.0%5476112 $79,000 -9.20% 54 -34.15% 96.3%8176114 $85,300 -10.96% 40 2.56% 91.3%8076115 $43,800 -13.78% 9 12.50% 97.4%10776116 $151,300 -4.30% 80 -16.67% 95.8%8576117 $65,400 -12.45% 39 -33.90% 97.1%6076118 $102,300 -13.67% 21 -58.00% 95.9%6476119 $44,700 -31.76% 30 -9.09% 96.8%5076120 $119,700 -11.79% 26 -43.48% 93.3%80

58

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 62: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Tarrant County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76123 $136,300 9.21% 94 -18.26% 97.8%7676126 $169,000 -24.92% 60 -7.69% 96.2%7576131 $128,700 -2.57% 107 -30.97% 96.8%7176132 $359,100 6.37% 56 16.67% 94.7%9076133 $94,000 -6.28% 79 -28.18% 96.5%9176134 $86,200 -7.51% 49 -34.67% 95.1%7076135 $104,300 -19.40% 34 -49.25% 96.5%8976137 $131,700 0.53% 107 -45.13% 98.3%5576140 $92,200 2.22% 63 3.28% 95.4%9076148 $91,400 -9.59% 62 -30.34% 97.3%5676162 $148,000 N/A 1 N/A 96.1%21976164 $61,700 20.27% 10 42.86% 93.9%5976177 $147,600 -10.16% 21 -12.50% 97.4%7876179 $162,000 6.86% 178 -16.04% 96.0%8876180 $145,800 -13.93% 55 -60.71% 97.3%5676182 $179,900 4.90% 75 294.74% 97.2%6176244 $170,000 -11.37% 251 457.78% 96.5%6876248 $296,300 32.63% 181 -58.39% 96.7%80

OTHER $227,500 -6.34% 235 -17.54% 96.0%79

59

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 63: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Taylor County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 53 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.3% in the second quarter to 6.7% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Taylor County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$129,400Average Price $146,100

935# Homes on the Market * 843

461# Homes Sold ** 342

42# New Homes Built *** 117 ***

75Avg # of Days on Market 87 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

79508 $170,100 24.89% 4 -20.00% 96.3%4479536 $87,800 47.32% 6 50.00% 97.5%3479541 $189,000 -36.36% 1 0.00% 94.5%1379562 $197,600 7.86% 24 41.18% 95.3%9979563 $36,000 N/A 1 N/A 90.2%13279601 $138,600 -15.38% 26 13.04% 98.1%10579602 $168,400 19.94% 89 -12.75% 98.0%7879603 $76,700 -5.66% 33 -15.38% 95.1%81

60

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 64: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Taylor County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

79605 $105,600 7.43% 73 -6.41% 95.9%9779606 $176,000 5.26% 85 -24.11% 97.5%91

61

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 65: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Upshur County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

In the first two months of the third quarter, 58 jobs were added to the payrolls of Upshur County. As a result of these new jobs, the average monthly unemployment rate fell from 8% during the second quarter to 7.9% for August and September. This steady job creation will help buyer confidence and fuel home purchases down the road. Favorable mortgage rates should support this trend.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

NAAverage Price $223,000

NA# Homes on the Market * 11

NA# Homes Sold ** 1

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

NAAvg # of Days on Market 149 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

OTHER $223,000 N/A 1 N/A 94.9%149

62

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 66: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Van Zandt County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 23 jobs in Van Zandt County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 7.5% for the second quarter to 7.7% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$142,300Average Price $125,000

441# Homes on the Market * 434

79# Homes Sold ** 60

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

129Avg # of Days on Market 131 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75103 $147,700 24.75% 19 -13.64% 95.2%11875117 $93,700 -10.76% 5 25.00% 94.8%5575140 $68,000 -55.58% 4 -50.00% 88.3%20475169 $129,400 24.30% 20 53.85% 91.8%16375754 $96,700 -43.84% 3 -66.67% 95.1%7175790 $136,600 35.38% 6 20.00% 92.9%138

OTHER $85,200 -40.63% 3 -40.00% 85.8%79

63

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 67: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Wise County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 30 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.3% in the second quarter to 8.5% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Wise County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$141,300Average Price $162,800

594# Homes on the Market * 564

123# Homes Sold ** 117

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

103Avg # of Days on Market 104 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76023 $287,700 160.60% 2 -84.62% 99.2%16076071 $43,000 -65.21% 1 -87.50% 89.6%10576073 $206,300 55.93% 13 8.33% 97.1%16076078 $112,000 -28.98% 17 -46.88% 97.3%5376225 $159,100 50.38% 6 -14.29% 98.0%13376234 $177,000 -9.23% 42 35.48% 93.9%9676267 $118,000 N/A 1 N/A 96.7%30076426 $115,300 -29.82% 19 -29.63% 95.1%81

64

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 68: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Wise County, TX

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76431 $295,500 56.85% 4 -33.33% 94.9%106OTHER $163,700 41.73% 12 -7.69% 84.1%144

65

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 69: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Wood County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment declined by 127 jobs in August and September. The job losses brought about an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 8.4% in the second quarter to 8.5% for the initial two months of the third quarter. Layoffs continued to rise, which will weigh buyer confidence and demand in Wood County. However, mortgage rates have once again hit record lows, creating a favorable buying environment for those with a job.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$170,100Average Price $158,800

274# Homes on the Market * 300

36# Homes Sold ** 42

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

123Avg # of Days on Market 125 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

75410 $121,400 -53.42% 5 -16.67% 86.2%24975494 $102,000 7.48% 14 40.00% 97.7%9175497 $149,100 -39.68% 6 20.00% 87.8%8275773 $250,500 62.66% 13 -7.14% 74.5%9775783 $113,300 -1.05% 3 -50.00% 92.5%253

OTHER $145,000 N/A 1 N/A 67.4%217

66

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 70: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Young County, TX

1 2 3 4 5 Seller's Market

Buyer's Market

Employment increased by 20 jobs in Young County during August and September. However, the number of job seekers also increased. The combined effect of these two trends was an increase in the average monthly unemployment rate from 6.6% for the second quarter to 6.8% in the first two months of the third quarter. Solid job growth will help confidence, while record low mortgage rates boost affordability.

Labor Market :

Housing Market :

(Forecast)Q2' 10 Q3' 10 Q4' 10

$95,000Average Price $83,900

24# Homes on the Market * 28

8# Homes Sold ** 9

NA# New Homes Built *** NA ***

76Avg # of Days on Market 61 * Available as of Sep. 30, 2010.

*** During the first two months of 3rd quarter. ** May not add to total of zip codes.

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

76374 $70,000 N/A 1 N/A 95.9%14976450 $85,700 1.30% 8 -20.00% 95.8%50

67

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 71: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Local Report

Others

Zip Code Average Price Price Change***

Total #Homes Sold

(Quarter)

% Change in #Homes Sold

***

Average Dayson Market

% of Asking Price(Sold/

List Price)

Data by Zip Codes for Q3 2010

11560 $583,500 N/A 304 N/A 100.0%39374728 $188,500 31.63% 2 -66.67% 97.3%4674764 $105,000 79.49% 1 0.00% 95.0%11575455 $149,100 -11.04% 4 -20.00% 90.2%10775501 $41,000 N/A 1 N/A 84.4%3975503 $40,900 -42.39% 2 100.00% 78.7%6675558 $32,000 N/A 1 N/A 91.7%21175563 $36,000 N/A 1 N/A 75.0%11575568 $46,300 -1.49% 1 0.00% 85.7%4775570 $45,700 N/A 1 N/A 87.5%14075656 $30,100 -58.19% 1 0.00% 115.8%1075833 $106,000 N/A 3 N/A 91.1%8075855 $145,000 N/A 1 N/A 98.4%976483 $8,565,000 13282.81% 1 0.00% 100.0%9076539 $114,600 N/A 1 N/A 100.0%1176550 $62,400 13.45% 1 0.00% 74.3%6876569 $33,000 N/A 1 N/A 85.9%13576691 $177,500 N/A 1 N/A 86.6%15476705 $210,000 N/A 1 N/A 93.8%3176801 $64,200 81.87% 4 33.33% 93.5%4576825 $50,000 N/A 1 N/A 87.4%10576844 $25,000 -78.99% 1 0.00% 67.4%13277340 $38,000 -69.75% 1 -75.00% 84.4%103

OTHER $736,900 294.49% 378 18800.00% 100.0%415

68

*** % Change of current quarter compared to the same quarter to year ago.

Page 72: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

PByM ThmHoREThsathovdewfilab Thprthag2.hocoEsfrhoea

Atdi3r

thhogrThthho  ThInth

Pricing Dy Ken Fears 

Manager, Regi

he tax credit hmomentum in owever, July’EALTORS® alhe gap in yeaales eased in Ahat gap persisverhang of suemand has giould‐be buyelled sellers wibout prices.   

he national mrice was stabihrough Augusgain in Septem4%.  Locally, ome price in tovered by Nostate Informaom July of thomes, which arlier in order

t the transactifficulty bridgrd quarter of 2he same time omes that solreater than 5%he increased hat sellers muomes. 

he tax credit bn some areas,hat sellers ma

 

Concessionthan 5% Concessionthan 5% 

During tonal Econom

had a robust May, draggins 25.3% dropike into a panr‐over‐year August, but sts.  The upply relative ven some ers pause andith anxiety 

median home ile from April st, but stumblmber falling the average the area rth Texas Reaation Systemsis year.  Remeare larger on r to illuminate

tion level, maing that gap. 2010 comparethe average ld in the 3rd q% was less thshare of salesust be more re

brought manthis backlash

ay need to low

D32

n Less 

n Greater 

the Postics 

impact on thng inventoriesp in national ynic.  

led 

al s was 4.4% higember that haverage.  Coe the true pri

any REALTORS Locally, the sed to the samnumber of dauarter of 201an during thes with large ceceptive to re

y buyers to thh has pushed wer their expe

Days on MarkeRd Quarter 009 

43.7 

117.0 

t‐Credit

e national hos lower and syear‐over‐yea

gher in Septeome prices tensequently, itce trend.   

S® report to share of homme period in 2ays on marke10 with a conce 3rd quarter ooncessions sue‐pricing to m

he table, but buyers and sectations for 

et 3Rd Quarter 2010 

75.6 

108.6 

t Hango

ousing markettabilizing pricr sales volum

mber of this yend to rise dut is best to co

 Home priceaverage prTexas Real 6.9% in Julratio suggefall.    

NAR a growinme sales with a2009.  At t for cession of 2009.  uggests move their 

may also havellers apart.  the sale price

over 

t.  Sales surgeces. This was me sent many 

year than in Suring the sumompare home

es only tell parice concessio Estate Informy to 9.0% in Sests that hom

ng divide betwa concession 

ve fed a buyerThe upward e in order to b

 

Concession than 5% Concession than 5% 

ed in April andan importantwould‐be bu

September ofmmer as famile prices from 

art of the stoon in the areamation SystemSeptember.  Tme prices may

ween buyers of greater th

r backlash whtrend in pricebe ready for s

Sh3Rd

20Less  5Greater  4

TR

d maintainedt shift in the muyers, sellers, 

f 2009.  This gies move andthe same pe

ry, though.  Ta covered by Nms increasedThis expansioy track downw

and sellers aan 5% rose d

hen it was take concession successful ne

hare of Total Sd Quarter 009 

32

52.2% 

47.6% 

RENDS

d this market.  and 

gap shrank d buy riod a year 

The North from 

on of the ward this 

nd uring the 

ken away.  suggests egotiations.  

Sales 3Rd Quarter 2010 

47.1% 

52.7% 

Sstuart
Typewritten Text
69
Page 73: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Economist’s Commentary  

  70   

Inflation or Deflation? by Lawrence Yun, NAR Chief Economist How low can we go? We saw another historic low in the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage as the average rate touched 4.3 percent recently. The low rates are certainly welcome in this current post homebuyer tax credit environment to entice more buyers into the market. Mortgage rates are exceptionally low right now for a couple of reasons. One is low inflation. Another reason: the Federal Reserve recently announced it may again start purchasing longterm bonds – which may include mortgage backed securities (MBSs). Even if MBSs are not included in the Fed’s repurchase program and it instead focuses only on government bonds, the bottom line impact will be roughly the same: such action will lower rates for any long-term borrowing. Because the bond market nearly always prices-in new information quickly, there may not be any downward movement on rates when the Fed actually does purchase bonds at later date. That is, from a practical point of view, the rate may have already reached the bottom. It is possible for rates to still go lower from this point onward, but more likely than not the rates will go higher. The path and the pace of change will be strongly influenced by changes in consumer prices. With so high an unemployment rate (in September it was 9.6 percent), there is not likely to be any wage and inflationary pressure, some say. Hence we can expect a continuing low interest-rate environment for quite some time. If anything, we should focus heavily on avoiding deflation – a condition of generally declining prices. Deflation could lead to us into 20 years of Japanese-economy-style stagnation. Recall if you will that Japan recovered from its utter destruction after World War II (yes, with the help of an “administering” U.S. presence and support). The Japanese economy took off. The country became so wealthy that its citizens started buying property (including land) all over Hawaii and trophy buildings across the mainland U.S. in the 1980s. Then came deflation in the early 1990s. All that progress suddenly halted as if the Japanese economy smacked into a brick wall. With that historical example in their minds, some policymakers are likewise – and perhaps rightly – very concerned about deflation and the possible accompanying future lost decades. After a slight CPI decline in 2009, the Federal Reserve opened the monetary spigot to avoid such a deflation scenario in the U.S. Some calm and economic growth returned. But our economy has been showing fresh signs of sputtering. Officials at the Fed have recently hinted at another opening of the monetary spigot via purchasing bonds – with freshly printed money. But wait a second. Can a society’s standard of living improve simply by printing money? Is there a free lunch? Doesn’t too much paper money eventually lead to too high a rate of inflation? The data is mixed. Let’s take a look. The consumer price index (CPI) rose 1.2 percent from August 2009 to August 2010. The more carefully watched core CPI figure which excludes the volatile energy and food components showed a tamer inflation rate of 1.0 percent. That is the lowest core CPI in more than 50 years. A key reason for this historic low core inflation rate has been tame housing rent growth over the past two years. If the housing rent component of the CPI – which accounts for nearly 30 percent of the “weight” of the CPI basket) were to pick up, then overall CPI would also surely rise. Rent for residential housing slid ever so slightly over the past two years to June of 2010 before starting to rise in the past two months. In fact, several apartments in the Washington D.C. region raised rents by 10 to 20 percent recently. While the D.C. area is no doubt unique (it has little employment troubles, especially compared to other markets), but if such a rent growth trend was to spread to many parts of the country then alarmingly high inflation will be with us – and likely for quite some time. In addition to a slight upturn in the housing rent component, some of the pipeline inflation measures have also been rising. The Producer Price Index (PPI) for final products rose by 3.0 percent in the past 12 months. PPI for intermediate products rose by 5.0 percent. PPI at the very early stage of production, for the crude goods, rose by a whopping 18.2 percent. Some commodity prices are rising as well. Wheat and

Page 74: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Economist’s Commentary  

  71   

raw coffee prices have spiked. Oil prices at $80 or so are not low by any means. And gold prices are at record highs. The U.S. government is also verbally trying to convince China to strengthen its currency, which by reverse means a weakening of the dollar. A weaker dollar also translates into higher import prices, which also add to the inflationary pressure. If rising PPI, commodity prices, and weaker dollar steadily begin to impact CPI to turn upward, then the Federal Reserve will have no choice other than to raise interest rates or lose the effectiveness of the monetary policy. My sense is that CPI inflation has already hit its low point and will rise. But the rise, hopefully, will be slight and gradual. Mortgage rates can then also rise gradually and not alarmingly. Our baseline forecast is for the 30-year fixed rate to hit 5 percent – but not until the middle of 2011 at the earliest. By that time, the economy should have added one million additional jobs -- on top of the 700,000 private sector job creations from January to September of this year. That pace of job creation is not robust, but it is still a sign of healing and a move in the right direction. Mortgage rates at near 5 percent (still amazingly attractive) and some job creation should be enough to help home sales rise above a 5 million unit annualized pace by the spring of 2011. This sales pace will still be subpar, barely matching the sales activity of 10 years ago when there were 30 million fewer people living in the U.S. But it will be adequate to keep home prices essentially stable. Under an alternative forecast scenario where the CPI rises very fast, mortgage rates will also sharply rise, perhaps, even to 7 or 8 percent. Homebuyers will clearly be put off. Homeowners, though, may see a boost in their home values, since real estate values have historically proven to rise in line with inflation. In such a scenario, oh how sweet it will be for those who locked in mortgage rates at an historic low 4.3 percent and then later experience home price gains while their monthly mortgage payments remain unchanged.

Page 75: 3rd Quarter, 2010 Economic and Market Watch Report

Economic Monitor 

Notes: All rates are seasonally adjusted. Existing home sales, new home sales and housing starts are shown in thousands. Employment growth is shown as month-to-month change in thousands. Sources: NAR, Bureau of the Census, Bureau of Labor Statistics and Freddie Mac.

72 

This table reflects data available through July 2, 2010. Likely Direction Recent Over the Next Forecast Monthly Indicator Forecast Six Months 

 

 

 

Existing-home sales rose 7.6% in August to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.13 million units. July re-sales figures were revised upward. Both single-family homes and condominium sales increased. Home values continue to stabilize; the national median existing home price was $178,600 in August – an increase of 0.8% from August of 2009. Sales still remain below par, and despite very attractive affordability conditions, housing’s recovery will be slow and gradual due to economic uncertainty.

New home sales registered a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 288,000 units in August – a level unchanged from July but 28.9% below the level a year ago. New home inventory was down only 1.1% from

Housing starts improved in August, rising 10.5% from the previous month to 598,000 units. The bulk of growth in starts remained in the multifamily sector. Housing permits – generally a reliable indicator of future starts – rose 1.8% to 569,000, with the bulk again in the multifamily segment.

Housing affordability continues to rise. NAR’s Housing Affordability Index posted a reading of 168.3 in August – up from July’s index of 162.2 as well as the 161.9 reading a year ago. The Index has been above 160 for a full 12 months.

Mortgage rates The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate continued to post new records lows, as it declined to 4.35% in September. While this is good news for “well-qualified home buyers,” according to NAR’s REALTORS® Confidence Index many REALTORS® indicate that that banks are more reluctant than ever to approve loans even to such qualified mortgage applicants.

Employment The economy shed 95,000 jobs in September – down from August’s 57,000 lost jobs and worse than most analysts expected. Private firms actually added 64,000 payrolls – for a ninth consecutive month of private job additions – but government payrolls declined by 159,000. Sectors posting job gains included health care, leisure and hospital, and retail. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 9.6%.

Economic Growth The economy grew 1.7% in the second quarter of this year. This is the third revision of second quarter GDP growth based on more complete data. The inflation measure remained unchanged. Additional data on Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) show that consumer spending rose 0.2% from July to August and was up 1.7% from a year ago.

Aug 2010 4,130 July 2010 3,840 Aug 2009 5,100

Slow and steady recovery

Aug 2010 288 July 2010 288 Aug 2009 405

Stock market wealth helps new home sales

Aug 2010 598 July 2010 541 Aug 2009 585

Sept 2010 4.35% Aug 2010 4.43% Sept 2009 5.06%

Aug 2010 168.3 July 2009 162.2 Aug 2009 161.9

Already at historic highs

Some loosening in construction loans will provide boost

A higher rate to compensate for a loss in future purchasing power of the dollar

Steady upward with gyrations induced by Census workers

Sept 2010 -95 Aug 2010 -57 12-month total: +344

2010:II +1.7% 2010:I +3.7% 2009:II -0.7%

Slow expansion unless business spending comes around