29 Matrix Management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 29 Matrix Management

    1/6

    Matrix ManagementNot a Structure, A Frame of Mind

    Aastha Grover | Aditi Gupta | Aniket Kulkarni |Ankur Aggarwal | Chitrank Jain | Tanya Malhotra

    Group # 29

  • 7/29/2019 29 Matrix Management

    2/6

    Choice is between Sticking to the knitting and fighting fire with fire.

    Choice has to be made because - dramatic changes in the global business landscape.

    Guess what?? Its not an either or case.

    The answer was Matrix Management - parallel reporting relationships, multiple

    information channels and overlapping responsibilities.

    But there are no free lunches. Parallel reporting > Confusion & turf battles,

    geographical barriers etc.

    Whats the ideal way a) Focus on managing details i.e. peoples & processes.

    b) Dont make a plan instead focus on creating a process which comes up with a plan.

    c) Capture individuals capabilities and thereby motivate organization.

    Why Matrix Management?

  • 7/29/2019 29 Matrix Management

    3/6

    Earlier: - Focus on strategic innovation rather than organizational challenges

    Matrix Management defined objective in purely structured terms. They must also

    concern themselves with: -

    Organizational Physiology

    System that allows information to flow

    Shared norms , values and beliefs

    Building the organization rather than developing a completely new structure. They: -

    Develop clear corporate vision

    Manage human resource

    Integrated Individual thinking

    Building an organization

  • 7/29/2019 29 Matrix Management

    4/6

    Building a shared Vision

    Need for a shared vision:

    Change in the anatomy must be complemented by change in psychology

    Mangers of large organizations tend to be bound by their specific responsibilities

    Clarity of

    expression:

    Three keys to clarity of expression of vision- simplicity, relevance and reinforcement

    Simplicity- Simple enough to be accepted organization wide ( Eg: C&C)

    Relevance- Linking broad objectives to concrete agendas (Eg: Phillips)

    Reinforcement- continual reinforcement, elaboration and interpretation of the vision (Eg: Panasonic)

    Continuity ofpurpose:

    Organization must continue to be committed to their core values despite changes in leadership orshort term business priorities

    Lack of continuity in core objective strategies leads to confusion (Eg: GE operations in Brazil)

    Consistencyof application:

    Top management must ensure that everyone in the company shares a common vision

    Lack of consistency of application in vision leads to chaos among managers often resulting in mutuallydebilitating agendas (Eg: North American Phillips)

    3 Cs of an organizations vision

  • 7/29/2019 29 Matrix Management

    5/6

    Key to regaining control of Companies that operate in fast changing

    environment is possible only if the top management has the ability to

    turn the individual managers into the building blocks of the organization.

    This can be done if a company invests in developing its human resources

    and use it as a trump card in times of crisis. Developing Human Resourceis a continuous process and following things need to be done for it.

    1) Recruitment & Selection

    2) Training and Development

    3) Career Path Management

    Developing Human Resources

  • 7/29/2019 29 Matrix Management

    6/6

    The Case of Philips

    CASEConvert managers intellectual understanding of the corporate vision to defend

    Western electronics against the Japanese into a binding personal commitment

    PROBLEMS

    SOLUTION

    Created a top-level World Policy

    Council for its video business that

    included key managers from

    strategic markets. The reluctance

    of independent managers to take

    orders from Dutch units was co-

    opted through this council

    Allocation of global responsibilities

    to units that previously had been

    purely national in focus. NAP

    Given lead in the development of

    projection television &

    coordination between Asia and

    North America

    Improving coordination without

    depletion of commitment of

    national management teams

    NAP refused to share the same

    vision as its parent company &

    refused to launch new VCRs

    The challenge is not so much to build a matrix structure as it is to create amatrix in the minds of our managers

    Co-option had transformed the defensive, territorial attitude of NAP managers into

    a more collaborative mind-set. They were making important contributions to global

    corporate strategy instead of looking for ways to subvert it

    RESUTLTS

    KeyLearning: