2016-10 Nashville Metro Report - Tennessee...Nashville Metro Public Health Department Air Monitoring Network Prepared for: Nashville Metro Public Health Department 2500 Charlotte Ave

Quarterly Audit Report for

Nashville Metro Public Health Department

Air Monitoring Network

Prepared for:

Nashville Metro Public Health Department

2500 Charlotte Ave

Nashville, TN 37209

Prepared by:

1128 NW 39th Drive

Gainesville, FL 32605

November 2016

environmental engineering

& measurement services, inc.

MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016

EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/LMAPCD i EEMS

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1-1

2.0 Audits of PM Samplers and Gaseous Pollutant Monitors ................................... 2-1

2.1 Audit Methods and Equipment .................................................................................... 2-1

2.1.1 Certification of EEMS Standards ....................................................................... 2-1

2.1.2 EPA Protocol Gas Standards and EEMS Mobile Laboratory ............................ 2-1

2.1.3 Level-2 Ozone Standard ..................................................................................... 2-1

2.2 Summary of Field Audit Activities .............................................................................. 2-2

2.3 Specific PM Sampler and Gaseous Monitor Audit Activities ...................................... 2-5

2.3.1 PM Sampler Audits ............................................................................................ 2-5

2.3.2 Gaseous Pollutant Monitor Audits ..................................................................... 2-5

2.3.3 Ozone Monitor Audits ........................................................................................ 2-7

2.3.4 Specific NO2 CO and SO2 Audit Activities........................................................ 2-8

3.0 Audit Results ............................................................................................................ 3-1

3.1 PM Audit Results ......................................................................................................... 3-1

3.2 NPAP-TTP Ozone Audit Results ................................................................................. 3-3

3.3 NPAP-TTP Sulfur Dioxide Audit Results ................................................................... 3-3

3.4 NPAP-TTP Carbon Monoxide Audit Results .............................................................. 3-4

3.5 NPAP-TTP Nitrogen Dioxide Audit Results ............................................................... 3-4

3.6 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 3-5

List of Tables

Table 1 Station Locations ............................................................................................................ 1-2

Table 2 Equipment Audited......................................................................................................... 1-2

Table 3 OAQPS Approved Audit Levels .................................................................................... 2-7

Table 4 Hillwood PM Sampler Verification ............................................................................... 3-1

Table 5 Lockeland PM Samplers Verifications ........................................................................... 3-2

Table 6 Ozone TTP Audit Results ............................................................................................... 3-3

Table 7 Sulfur Dioxide TTP Audit Results ................................................................................. 3-4

Table 8 Carbon Monoxide TTP Audit Results ............................................................................ 3-4

Table 9 Nitrogen Dioxide TTP Audit Results ............................................................................. 3-5

List of Figures

Figure 1 EEMS Mobile Laboratory ............................................................................................. 2-2

Figure 2 Hillwood PM Sampler .................................................................................................. 2-3

Figure 3 Lockeland PM Samplers ............................................................................................... 2-3

Figure 4 East Health Center and Mobile Lab .............................................................................. 2-4


EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/LMAPCD ii EEMS

Figure 5 Near Road Station ......................................................................................................... 2-4

Figure 6 Near Road Audit Gas Delivery ..................................................................................... 2-5

Figure 7 East Health Center Audit Gas Delivery ........................................................................ 2-6

Figure 8 Percy Priest Dam Ozone Sample Inlet .......................................................................... 2-6

List of Appendices

Appendix A Audit Data Sheets

Appendix B Maps of Locations

Appendix C Audit Standards Certifications


EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/LMAPCD iii EEMS

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CO carbon monoxide

DAS data acquisition system

EEMS Environmental, Engineering & Measurement Services, Inc.

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

FRM Federal Reference Method

lpm liters per minute

mm Hg millimeters of mercury

MPHD Metro Public Health Department

mps meters per second

NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology

NO nitric oxide

NPAP National Performance Audit Program

OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

O3 Ozone

PE Performance Evaluation

PM particulate matter

PM2.5 particulate matter of 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter or less

PM10 particulate matter of 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter or less

ppm parts per million

PSD prevention of significant deterioration

QA quality assurance

rpm revolutions per minute

S/N serial number

SLAMS State or Local Air Monitoring Stations

SO2 sulfur dioxide

SOP standard operating procedure

TTP Through-The-Probe

μg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter


EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 1-1 EEMS

1.0 Introduction

Environmental, Engineering & Measurement Services, Inc. (EEMS) was contracted by the

Nashville Metro Public Health Department to conduct audits of the district’s local ambient air

quality gaseous and PM pollutant monitoring network. The air quality monitoring network

consists of five stations in the greater Nashville, Tennessee Metro Area which are operated by the

Metro Public Health Department (MPHD). The purpose of this network is to fulfill and comply

with specific monitoring requirements for State or Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) as

specified by the EPA in 40 CFR Part 58. The operation of the monitoring stations must meet the

requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A, which defines the quality assurance (QA)

requirements for gaseous and PM pollutant ambient air monitoring. The audits performed by

EEMS under this contract fulfilled the requirement for quarterly independent audits of all

pollutant monitors in the network. The QA requirements can be found at:

http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/qa/appd_validation_template_amtic.pdf.

The trained and certified EEMS field scientist followed the National Performance Audit Program

(NPAP) procedures while performing audits of all air quality monitors.

The NPAP is a QA program implemented by the EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and

Standards (OAQPS) to conduct audits of gaseous air pollutant analyzers by standard methods

throughout each region of the U.S. The method includes introduction of National Institute of

Standards and Traceability (NIST) audit gases to the station analyzers through the ambient

sample inlet, including all filters and fittings. This method evaluates the entire sample train. The

audit gas concentrations are also measured and verified with an audit analyzer on-site which is

calibrated at the time of the audit.

EEMS performed the NPAP Through-The-Probe (TTP) gas analyzer audits following EPA’s

Quality Assurance Guidance Document – Method Compendium – Field Standard Operating

Procedures (SOP) for the Federal PM2.5 Performance Evaluation Program and NPAP TTP Audit

SOP. All procedures and guidance documents used to perform these audits can be found at the

EPA OAQPS website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/.

This report includes the results of the NPAP TTP and PM sampler audits conducted from October

24th through October 26th, 2016. The ambient air quality monitors audited were operating at five

stations in the network:

1. Hillwood

2. Lockeland

3. Percy Priest Dam

4. East Health Center

5. Near Road

All stations are in the Nashville Metro area and in Davidson County, TN. Map images of the

sites are included in Appendix B.



The monitoring station locations were obtained during the audit visits with a GPS and are

provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Station Locations

Site Latitude Longitude Elevation (meters)

Hillwood 36.118261 -86.873640 179

Lockeland 36.176280 -86.738982 161

Percy Priest Dam 36.150671 -86.623338 157

East Health Center 36.204696 -86.744816 167

Near Road 36.142337 -86.734112 159

The audited monitoring equipment operating at each site is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Equipment Audited

Site Location Parameter Sampler Manufacture Model No. Serial No.

Hillwood #036 PM2.5 Thermo Environmental 2025i 0746-074745

Lockeland #023 PM2.5 Thermo Environmental 2025i 202512-02161204

Lockeland #223 PM2.5 Thermo Environmental 2025i 202512-02241204

Lockeland PM2.5 Thermo Environmental TEOM 1405 1405A-134931502

Percy Priest Dam Ozone Thermo Environmental 49i A2NAB 1322458652

East Health Center NOx Thermo Environmental 42i ANMSPAA 1153030011

East Health Center SO2 Thermo Environmental 43i AZSAB 1303156453

East Health Center Ozone Thermo Environmental 49i A3NCA CM09130037

Near Road NOx Thermo Environmental 42i TL-ANMSDAB 1324658812

Near Road CO Thermo Environmental 48i TLE-ACPAB 1324658815

Additional support materials operated at each of the stations include multi-gas dilution systems,

zero air generation systems, and NIST traceable calibration gases. The sites that measure ozone

also have level 3-certified standard photometers to verify Quality Check (QC) concentrations.

Details of the audits are presented in the following sections:



Section 2.0 Audits of PM Samplers and Gaseous Pollutant Monitors

Section 3.0 Audit Results

Appendix A Audit Data Sheets

Appendix B Maps of Locations

Appendix C Audit Standards Certifications

The preparation of this report, and all the activities and tasks described in this report, were

performed by an accredited NPAP-TTP mobile lab Field Scientist. All procedures followed

during the audits were provided by OAQPS and are available at the OAQPS website:

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/npepqa.html.

Any questions related to this audit or audit report should be addressed to:

Eric Hebert

EEMS Inc.

P.O. Box 357593

Gainesville, FL 32635

Telephone: 352-262-0802

Fax: 352-371-1144

E-mail: [email protected]



2.0 Audits of PM Samplers and Gaseous Pollutant Monitors

2.1 Audit Methods and Equipment

This section describes the steps followed in the performance of these audits. EEMS followed the

document referenced above rigorously. Supplemental guidance and excerpts from the method

can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/npepqa.html.

2.1.1 Certification of EEMS Standards

All standards owned and maintained by EEMS undergo annual NIST traceable certification. The

standards include EPA Protocol Gas standards, digital multi-meters, meteorological sensors and

standards, and various flow rate measurement systems including two DeltaCal devices. Copies of

the annual certifications of the EEMS standards used for these audits are included in Appendix C.

2.1.2 EPA Protocol Gas Standards and EEMS Mobile Laboratory

EEMS owns and maintains a Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc. (TEI) 48i TLE carbon

monoxide analyzer which is used to verify standard audit gas concentrations during NPAP-TTP

audits. The CO analyzer is mounted and operated in a climate controlled mobile laboratory with a

multi-gas dilution system and NIST traceable EPA Protocol Gas standards. The NIST gases

include cylinders of ultra-pure air, high concentration CO, low concentration CO, and a multi-

blend NO, CO, SO2 mixture. The mobile laboratory is equipped with its own data acquisition

system (DAS). An image of the EEMS mobile laboratory is included in Figure 1.

2.1.3 Level-2 Ozone Standard

EEMS owns and maintains a Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc. (TEI) 49C level-2 ozone

standard photometer. The standard photometer is mounted and operated in the climate controlled

mobile laboratory with a multi-gas dilution system and other standards. The serial output of the

ozone standard is monitored and recorded by the mobile laboratory DAS.

The standard photometer is transported to Research Triangle Park (RTP) North Carolina, or one

of the EPA regional laboratories for verification at least twice per year. The most recent

verification with the Standard Reference Photometer (SRP) from EPA Region 7 is included in

Appendix C.



Figure 1 EEMS Mobile Laboratory

2.2 Summary of Field Audit Activities

The MPHD air quality network operates PM samplers at two sites, Hillwood High School and

Lockeland Elementary School. On Monday October 24th, 2016, EEMS personnel met MPHD

personnel at the Hillwood site for the station’s PM2.5 sampler audits. Following the audit at

Hillwood, both EEMS and MPHD personnel traveled to the Lockeland site where the station’s

three operating PM samplers were audited.

After completing the PM sampler audits, EEMS personnel traveled to the Percy Priest Dam

station and met with additional MPHD personnel and performed the audit of the station’s ozone

monitor.

On Tuesday October 25th EEMS personnel met MPHD personnel at the East Public Health Center

and performed TTP audits of the Station’s ozone, NOx, and SO2 monitors.

On Wednesday October 26th EEMS personnel met MPHD personnel at the Near Road site and

performed TTP audits of the station’s NOx and CO monitors. While at the station a shelter

temperature sensor was installed in the serial port of the station’s DAS. The MPHD lab and

office was visited after completing the Near Road station audit to assist with configuration of the

new shelter temperature sensor.

Images of some of the sites and samplers are provided in Figures 2 through 5 below.



Figure 2 Hillwood PM Sampler

Figure 3 Lockeland PM Samplers



Figure 4 East Health Center and Mobile Lab

Figure 5 Near Road Station



2.3 Specific PM Sampler and Gaseous Monitor Audit Activities

This section describes the procedures used for audits of each parameter at all sites. More detailed

NPAP-TTP audit procedures can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/npepqa.html.

2.3.1 PM Sampler Audits

The sampler dates and times were verified for all samplers and found to be within 2 minutes of

the actual time. The PM10 (first cut point) inlets were removed from the samplers and the EEMS

DeltaCal standard was installed at the inlet to the sample train. The samplers’ operational

variables (flow rate, temperature, and pressure) were compared to the variables as measured by

the standard. All variables were found within acceptance limits and audit results are included in

Section 3.

2.3.2 Gaseous Pollutant Monitor Audits

The EEMS mobile laboratory audit analyzers and systems were allowed to warm-up overnight

prior to each station audit. At sites that measure ozone, the TTP ozone audit was conducted first.

Following the ozone audit, the TTP NOx, CO, and/or SO2 audits were performed depending on

which parameters were being measured at the site. Audits of gaseous monitors other than ozone

were performed simultaneously by providing audit gas to both monitor inlets using Teflon “tee”

connectors or Teflon bag for the Near Road sample inlet. Images of the audit gas delivery system

are included in Figures 6 through 8 below.

Figure 6 Near Road Audit Gas Delivery



Figure 7 East Health Center Audit Gas Delivery

Figure 8 Percy Priest Dam Ozone Sample Inlet



All analyzer sample pressures and flow rates were checked prior to, and following the

introduction of audit gas to ensure that changes to the routine sampling variables did not occur as

a result of the addition of audit gas (test atmosphere) to the sampling inlet.

Audit test gas concentrations were selected from the OAQPS list of expanded audit levels

recently approved and included in the CFR part 58 revisions. Table 3 provides the approved

list of audit levels. Audit concentrations from at least three audit levels were selected for each

monitor audit. The final results of the NPAP TTP audits are included in Section 3.0.

Table 3 OAQPS Approved Audit Levels

Audit Level Concentration Range, ppm

O3 SO2 NO2 CO

1 0.004 - 0.0059 0.0003 - 0.0029 0.0003 - 0.0029 0.020 - 0.059

2 0.006 - 0.019 0.0030 - 0.0049 0.0030 - 0.0049 0.060 - 0.199

3 0.020 - 0.039 0.0050 - 0.0079 0.0050 - 0.0079 0.200 - 0.899

4 0.040 - 0.069 0.0080 - 0.0199 0.0080 - 0.0199 0.900 - 2.999

5 0.070 - 0.089 0.0200 - 0.0499 0.0200 - 0.0499 3.000 - 7.999

6 0.090 - 0.119 0.0500 - 0.0999 0.0500 - 0.0999 8.000 - 15.999

7 0.120 - 0.139 0.1000 - 0.1499 0.1000 - 0.2999 16.000 - 30.999

8 0.140 - 0.169 0.1500 - 0.2599 0.3000 - 0.4999 31.000 - 39.999

9 0.170 - 0.189 0.2600 - 0.7999 0.5000 - 0.7999 40.000 - 49.999

10 0.190 - 0.259 0.8000 - 1.000 0.8000 - 1.000 50.000 - 60.000

2.3.3 Ozone Monitor Audits

Ozone audit test gas was generated with the ozone generator in the mobile laboratory’s dilution

system. The audit gas was delivered to the station analyzer through the station inlet tubing using

a Teflon “tee” to allow the audit gas to vent at the inlet. The audit gas concentration was

measured with the level-2 standard photometer in the mobile lab and recorded by the mobile lab

DAS. One minute averages were reported by the site operator from the station monitor and

compared to the averages for the same time period from the standard.



2.3.4 Specific NO2 CO and SO2 Audit Activities

Prior to beginning the NOx, CO, and SO2 audits, the EEMS audit CO analyzer was calibrated

using the NIST ultra-pure air and CO gases. This was accomplished by supplying the EEMS

mobile laboratory CO analyzer with NIST gas directly from the cylinders and not through the

mobile lab dilution system. Data from this “Pre-audit” calibration was entered into the

OAQPS audit spreadsheet to be used to calculate the concentration of all audit gases

generated during the station audits.

The site audits were accomplished by generating audit test gas using the mobile laboratory

dilution system and the NIST multi-blend gas. The audit gas was delivered to the station

analyzers at the station sample inlet, through all filters and fittings using Teflon tubing and a

Teflon bag to allow the audit gas to vent at the inlet. The generated audit gas CO concentrations

were verified with the mobile laboratory CO analyzer. The other audit gas concentrations

were then calculated based on the ratio of CO to the other gases in the NIST multi-blend

audit gas cylinder.

Immediately following the station audits, the mobile laboratory CO analyzer was again

challenged directly with the NIST cylinder gases. The results of this “Post-audit” challenge

were entered into the OAQPS spreadsheet to correct the audit standard gas concentrations,

accounting for any drift of the mobile laboratory CO analyzer. This procedure (Pre-audit CO

calibration, multipoint station audits, and Post-audit CO challenge) is the same OAQPS

standard procedure used routinely for all NPAP TTP audits.



3.0 Audit Results

3.1 PM Audit Results

All operational and reporting PM 2.5 samplers were audited with the EEMS DeltaCal standard.

The samplers’ date and time and all operational variables were found to be within acceptable

limits. The Hillwood sampler results are summarized in Table 4 and the results of the three

samplers at Lockeland are included in Table 5.

Table 4 Hillwood PM Sampler Verification

Delta Cal Version 3.37P Site Hillwood

TEI Partisol 2025i

(#036) PM2.5

Firmware Version s/n = 0746-074745

DeltaCal S/N 1196 EEMS # 01451 DeltaCal Cert

Date: 1/25/2016

Date & Site of Verification 10/24/2016 Hillwood Partisol 2025i PM-2.5

Parameter DeltaCal 2025 Site Sampler Difference Acceptance

Criteria Pass/Fail

Flow Rate (Lpm) 16.60 16.67 0.42% ≤ ± 4% Pass

Design Flow Rate (16.67 Lpm) 16.60 -0.42% ≤ ± 4% Pass

Ambient Temperature (oC) 17.7 18.9 1.2 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass

Barometric Pressure (mm Hg) 751.5 753 1.5

≤ ± 10 mm Hg

Pass

Filter Temperature (oC) 17.8 18.0 0.2 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass

Leak Check start = NA flow = N/A ≤ 5cm H2O N/A



Table 5 Lockeland PM Samplers Verifications

Delta Cal Version 3.37P Site Lockeland

TEI Partisol 2025i

POC 1 (#023) s/n 202512-02161204

Firmware Version TEI Partisol 2025i

POC 2 (#223) s/n 202512-02241204

DeltaCal S/N 1196 EEMS # 01451 DeltaCal Cert Date: 1/25/2016

Date & Site of Verification 10/24/2016 Lockeland Partisol PM-2.5

Parameter DeltaCal POC 1 Sampler Difference Acceptance

Criteria Pass/Fail

Flow Rate (Lpm) 16.95 16.67 -1.65% ≤ ± 4% Pass

Design Flow Rate (16.67 Lpm)

16.95 1.68% ≤ ± 4% Pass

Ambient Temperature (oC)

20.3 19.7 -0.6 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass

Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)

753.5 752 -1.5 ≤ ± 10 mm

Hg Pass

Filter Temperature (oC) 20.9 20.1 -0.8 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass

Date & Site of Verification 10/24/2016 Lockeland Partisol colocated PM-2.5

Parameter DeltaCal POC 2 Sampler Difference Acceptance

Criteria Pass/Fail

Flow Rate (Lpm) 16.66 16.67 0.06% ≤ ± 4% Pass


16.66 -0.06% ≤ ± 4% Pass


19.5 19.3 -0.2 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass


753.5 754 0.5 ≤ ± 10 mm

Hg Pass

Filter Temperature (oC) 19.7 18.0 -1.7 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass

TEOM 1405 PM2.5

Firmware Version S/N = 1450A-134931502

Date and PEP Sampler 10/24/2016 Lockeland TEOM PM-2.5

Parameter DeltaCal PQ200 Audit

Sampler Difference

Acceptance Criteria

Pass/Fail

Flow Rate (Lpm) 16.87 16.67 -1.19% ≤ ± 4% Pass


16.87 1.20% ≤ ± 4% Pass


19.7 18.37 -1.33 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass


753.5 751 -2.5 ≤ ± 10 mm

Hg Pass



3.2 NPAP-TTP Ozone Audit Results

The audit results of the two ozone monitors in the network were within the acceptance limits of

±10% of any single audit point and within the warning level of ± 7%. The low level (level 2) test

points checked were within the warning limit of ± 0.001ppm. Although within acceptable limits,

the response of the ozone monitor at the East Health Center site to “ozone-free” test gas was

slightly low at -1ppb. This was likely a contributing factor to the overall low response of the

monitor to audit test gas. There were no observed problems with the accuracy of the station

monitors. The results of the O3 audits are summarized in Table 6. The field audit forms are

included in Appendix A.

Table 6 Ozone TTP Audit Results

Site and Audit Level Audit Value

(ppm) Site Value

(ppm) %

Difference

Absolute Difference

(ppm)

Pass Warning Fail

Percy Priest – level 6 0.10135 0.0974 -3.9 % -0.0040 Pass



Percy Priest – level 3 0.02772 0.0272 -1.9 % --0.0005 Pass

Percy Priest – level 2 0.01666 0.0165 N/A -0.0002 Pass

East – level 5 0.07201 0.07143 -0.8 % -0.0006 Pass

East – level 4 0.04731 0.04683 -1.0 % -0.0005 Pass

East – level 2 0.01435 0.01378 N/A -0.0006 Pass

3.3 NPAP-TTP Sulfur Dioxide Audit Results

The single SO2 monitor in the network is operated at the East Health Center site. The audit

results were within the acceptance limits of ±15% of any single audit point and within the

warning limit of ±10%. The low level (level 2) test point was within the warning limit of

±0.001ppm. There were no observed problems with the accuracy of the station monitors. The

result of the SO2 audit is summarized in Table 7. The field audit forms are included in Appendix

A.



Table 7 Sulfur Dioxide TTP Audit Results


(ppm) Site Value

(ppm) %

Difference

Absolute Difference

(ppm)

Pass Warning Fail

East – level 7 0.1484 0.1471 -0.9 % -0.0013 Pass

East – level 6 0.0743 0.0732 -1.5 % -0.0011 Pass

East – level 5 0.0371 0.0354 -4.5 % -0.0017 Pass

East – level 4 0.0195 0.0183 -6.2 % -0.0012 Pass

East – level 2 0.0041 0.0032 N/A -0,0009 Pass

3.4 NPAP-TTP Carbon Monoxide Audit Results

There is one CO monitor in the network at the Near Road site. The audit result of that monitor

was within the acceptance limits of ± 15% of any single audit point. The lowest concentration

level tested was above the warning limits of ± 10%. The monitor response to “zero air” was

slightly high at 0.080 ppm. The zero response likely contributed to the error at the low audit test

points. There were no observed problems with the accuracy of the station monitor. The results of

the CO audit are summarized in Table 8. The field audit forms are included in Appendix A.

Table 8 Carbon Monoxide TTP Audit Results


(ppm) Site Value

(ppm) %

Difference

Absolute Difference

(ppm)

Pass Warning Fail

Near Road – level 6 14.785 15.150 2.5 % 0.3650 Pass




Near Road – level 3 0.742 0.848 14.2 % 0.1055 Warning

3.5 NPAP-TTP Nitrogen Dioxide Audit Results

All of the NO2 audit results for all sites were within the acceptance limits of ± 15% of any single

audit point, and within the warning limits of ±10%. All zero concentration levels were also

found within acceptable limits. There were no observed problems with the accuracy of the station

monitors. The results of the NO2 audits are summarized in Table 9. The field audit forms are

included in Appendix A.



Table 9 Nitrogen Dioxide TTP Audit Results


(ppm) Site Value

(ppm) %

Difference

Absolute Difference

(ppm)

Pass Warning Fail

East – level 7 0.1050 0.0991 -5.6 % -0.0059 Pass

East – level 5 0.0440 0.0409 -7.1 % -0.0031 Pass

East – level 4 0.0184 0.0169 -8.3 % -0.0015 Pass

East – level 2 0.0036 0.0027 N/A -0.0009 Pass

East Converter Efficiency – level 7 100.2 % Pass




Near Road – level 7 0.1002 0.0981 -2.1 % -0.0021 Pass

Near Road – level 5 0.0428 0.0424 -0.9 % -0.0004 Pass


Near Road – level 2 0.0036 0.0040 N/A 0.0004 Pass

Near Road Converter Efficiency – level 7 97.8 % Pass




3.6 Recommendations

The stations in the MPHD monitoring network are in good condition and very well run. Site

operators are knowledgeable and maintain the site monitors in very good working order.

Operation of the gaseous pollutant monitors would be improved by automation of the routine

zero/precision and span functions. Routine automation of the baseline (zero drift) correction of

the trace-level carbon monoxide monitor at the Near Road site would improve the operation of

that monitor.

EEMS is working on an estimate of costs and time to complete the recommended improvements

to the monitoring network operation.

APPENDIX A

Audit Data Sheets

Site Name: Percy Priest Dam Airs ID: 0Auditor: Eric Hebert (EEMS) Audit Date: 10/24/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)

Instrument: Ozone COManufacturer: Thermo 0Model: 49C-PS 0Serial Number: 0517112167 0Calibration Date: 09/14/16 1/0/1900Slope: 1.00261 0Intercept (PPM): -0.00015202 0

STATION INSTRUMENT INFORMATIONInstrument:Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 49i-A2NABProperty Number:Calibration Date:Slope/Intercept (PPB): 0.0000 0.0000Indicated Flow (LPM):In-Line Filter Change:Manifold Type:

Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric Hebert (EEMS)

O3 Audit Level 6 Pass PrintO3 Audit Level 5 Pass O3 Audit Level 4 Pass SignatureO3 Audit Level 3 Pass O3 Audit Level 2 Pass

EPA person notified in case of audit failure

Audit LimitsPass Bias < ±10% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable drift (0.003 ppm) Fail Bias > ±10% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable drift (0.003 ppm)

Warning Bias > ±7% AND difference from actual concentration > 0.0015 ppm

Comments:

0.10135 0.09740 -3.9

Ozone

OZONE REPORT

NPAP O3 Concentration (ppm)

PRELIMINARY OZONE AUDIT RESULTS

Site Response (ppm)

Percent Difference

FINAL NPAP THROUGH-THE-PROBE AUDIT REPORT

MOBILE PE LAB INSTRUMENTS

10/14/161/4" Teflon

0.69 / 0.69

132245865201/00/00

EEMS Van-1

0

0.02772 0.02720 -1.9

0.07378 0.07240 -1.9

0.04747 0.04670 -1.6

0.00028 0.00140

0.01666 0.01650 -1.0

Site Name: Percy Priest Dam Audit Date: 10/24/2016

-0.0040 Pass -0.0014 Pass -0.0008 Pass -0.0005 Pass -0.0002 Pass

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

* = CFR Appendix A Audit Levels

SO2 Audit Point #1SO2 Audit Point #2

NO2 Audit Point #4

Warning

CO Audit Point #2CO Audit Point #3

Carbon Monoxide

0.073780.047470.02772

0.0724O3 Audit Level 6

0.0467

Pass/Fail

0.10135

-1.6

0.016660.0272

0.0974

CO Audit Point #1

NOx Audit Point #1NOx Audit Point #2

NOx Audit Point #4

NO Audit Point #1NO Audit Point #2

NOx Audit Point #3

NO2 Audit Point #1

FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORTEEMS Van-1

Ozone

ParameterNPAP Lab Response

(ppm)Station Response

(ppm)

-3.9

0.0165

-1.9

-1.9

O3 Audit Level 5O3 Audit Level 4

O3 Audit Level 2

Oxides of Nitrogen

Percent Difference

-1.0O3 Audit Level 3

Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #4

NO2 Audit Point #2

SO2 Audit Point #3

NO2 Audit Point #3

Sulfur Dioxide

Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #1Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #2Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #3



Absolute Difference

(ppm)

NO Audit Point #5

NOx Audit Point #5


Site Name: East Health Center Airs ID: 0Auditor: Eric Hebert (EEMS) Audit Date: 10/25/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)

Instrument: Ozone COManufacturer: Thermo 0Model: 49C-PS 0Serial Number: 0517112167 0Calibration Date: 09/14/16 1/0/1900Slope: 1.00261 0Intercept (PPM): -0.00015202 0

STATION INSTRUMENT INFORMATIONInstrument:Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 49i-A3NCAProperty Number:Calibration Date:Slope/Intercept (PPB): 0.0000 0.0000Indicated Flow (LPM):In-Line Filter Change:Manifold Type:

Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric Hebert (EEMS)

O3 Audit Level 6 N/A PrintO3 Audit Level 5 Pass O3 Audit Level 4 Pass SignatureO3 Audit Level 2 Pass O3 Audit Level 1 N/A

EPA person notified in case of audit failure



Comments:The station monitor response to ozone-free air (0 ppm) was somewhat low (-1 ppb) which contributed to the overall error at low concentration audit levels.

0.01435 0.01378 -4.0

0.07201 0.07143 -0.8

0.04731 0.04683 -1.0

0.00033 -0.00106

FINAL NPAP THROUGH-THE-PROBE AUDIT REPORT

MOBILE PE LAB INSTRUMENTS

10/24/161/4" Teflon

0.70 / 0.70

CM0913003701/00/00

EEMS Van-1

Ozone

OZONE REPORT

NPAP O3 Concentration (ppm)

PRELIMINARY OZONE AUDIT RESULTS

Site Response (ppm)

Percent Difference

Site Name: East Health Center Audit Date: 10/25/2016

N/A-0.0006 Pass -0.0005 Pass -0.0006 Pass

N/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

* = CFR Appendix A Audit Levels

Absolute Difference

(ppm)

NO Audit Point #5

NOx Audit Point #5




Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #4

NO2 Audit Point #2

SO2 Audit Point #3

NO2 Audit Point #3

Sulfur Dioxide

Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #1Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #2Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #3

Oxides of Nitrogen

Percent Difference

O3 Audit Level 2


NOx Audit Point #4


NOx Audit Point #3

NO2 Audit Point #1

FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORTEEMS Van-1

Ozone



(ppm)

-0.8

-4.0

O3 Audit Level 5O3 Audit Level 4

O3 Audit Level 1


NO2 Audit Point #4

Warning


Carbon Monoxide

0.072010.047310.01435

0.07143O3 Audit Level 6

0.04683

Pass/Fail

-1.00.01378

CO Audit Point #1

Site Name: East Airs ID: Auditor: Eric Hebert Audit Date: 10/25/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)

Instrument: Ozone CO Instrument:Manufacturer: Thermo TEI Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 42i-ANMSPAAModel: 49C-PS 48i TLE Property Number:Serial Number: 0517112167 1503464200 Calibration Date:Calibration Date: 09/14/16 Calibrated Slope/Intercept: 0.000 0.000Slope 1.00261 on Indicated Flow:Intercept -0.00015202 day of audit In-Line Filter Change:

Manifold Type:

Pass/Fail Warning WarningPassPassPassPassN/A

Audit Limits

Pass Bias < ±15% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable Fail Bias > ±15% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable


Converter Efficiency Audit LimitsPass Between 96% and 104%Fail <96% or >104%

Warning Between 96%-97% or 103%-104%

Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric HebertPass PrintPassPass SignaturePassPassPassPass EPA person notified in case of audit failurePass

Comments:0

NOx Audit Point #1

0.0042

0.0380

-3.7

Pass

0.0002

0.1520

0.0780

-0.0001

0.1554

0.0761 2.4

0.1520

0.0761

0.0002

-3.3

0.0737 -3.1

2.3

FINAL NPAP THROUGH-THE-PROBE AUDIT REPORTEEMS Van-1

MOBIL PE LAB INSTRUMENTSNO/NOX

PRELIMINARY NO AUDIT RESULTS PRELIMINARY NOx AUDIT RESULTS

1/4" Teflon

01/00/00

NITROGEN OXIDES REPORT

STATION INTRUMENT INFORMATION

1153030011

1.1 L/min10/24/2016

NPAP NO Concentration (ppm)

Percent Difference

Site Response (ppm)

NPAP NOX CONCENTRATION (ppm)

0.0200

0.0380

0.0000-0.0004 -0.0004

0.0387 -3.21.8

0.01930.0203 1.4

0.0368

SITE RESPONSE (ppm)

Percent Difference

-0.0001

0.1470

NOx Audit Point #5

0.0001

NPAP NO2 Concentration (ppm)

Site Response (ppm)

Percent Difference

N/A

Pass/Fail

0.0200

NO Audit Point #3

PRELIMINARY NO2 AUDIT RESULTS

NO Audit Point #2

NO Audit Point #4 NOx Audit Point #4 Pass

NO Audit Point #1

NO Audit Point #5

Converter Efficiency

0.0042

PassPassNOx Audit Point #3

NOx Audit Point #2

0.1050

0.0036

0.0000

100.2%

0.0409 -7.1

0.0184 0.0169 -8.3 99.3%

0.0440

-25.8 97.5%

0.0991 -5.6

-0.0085

100.1%

0.0036 0.0027 -25.8 97.5%

Converter Efficiency NO2 level 5


0.0027


NO2 Audit level 5NO2 Audit level 4

NO2 Audit level 7

NO2 Audit level 2


Site Name: East Airs ID: Auditor: Eric Hebert Audit Date: 10/25/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)

Instrument: Ozone COManufacturer: Thermo TEIModel: 49C-PS 48i TLESerial Number: 0517112167 1503464200Calibration Date: 09/14/16 CalibratedSlope 1.00261 on Intercept -0.00015202 day of audit

STATION INSTRUMENT INFORMATIONInstrument:Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 43i-AZSABProperty Number:Calibration Date:Slope/Intercept: 0.000 0.000Indicated Flow:In-Line Filter Change:Manifold Type:

Pass/Fail WarningSO2 Audit level 7 Pass Auditor Eric HebertSO2 Audit level 6 Pass Print

SO2 Audit level 5 PassSO2 Audit level 4 Pass Signature

SO2 Audit level 2 PassEPA person notified in case of audit failure



Comments:

1303156453


MOBIL PE LAB INSTRUMENTS

SULFUR DIOXIDE REPORT

0.0183 -6.2

-21.2

SO2

0.6 L/min

0.1471

01/00/00

10/24/20161/4" Teflon

PRELIMINARY SULFUR DIOXIDE AUDIT RESULTS

0.0002

0.0743

0.0371

0.0732

0.0354

-1.5

-4.5

0

NPAP SO2 Concentration (ppm)

0.0032

0.1484

0.0001

-0.9

-0.0004 -0.0003

Percent DifferenceSite Response

(ppm)

0.0195

0.0041

Site Name: East Audit Date: 10/25/2016

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

-0.0003 Pass0.0034 Pass 0.0019 Pass 0.0007 Pass 0.0003 Pass

N/A0.0004 Pass

-0.0003 Pass-0.0050 Pass -0.0024 Pass -0.0012 Pass -0.0007 Pass

N/A0.0005 Pass

0.0000-0.0059 Pass -0.0031 Pass -0.0015 Pass -0.0009 Pass0.0001

100.2% Pass100.1% Pass99.3% Pass97.5% Pass

-0.0001 Pass-0.0013 Pass -0.0011 Pass -0.0017 Pass-0.0012 Pass-0.0009 Pass0.0001 Pass

Warning

CO Audit level 4CO Audit level 3

Carbon Monoxide

Ozone Audit Point #1

Pass/Fail

3.669

CO Audit level 5

FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASEDEEMS Van-1

Ozone



(ppm)

Ozone Audit Point #2Ozone Audit Point #3


Pre Zero

Percent Difference

Absolute Difference

(ppm)

NO Audit Point #2

NOx Audit Point #3 0.03680.0193

0.0002

NO Audit Point #5


1.930

2.3

Oxides of Nitrogen

-0.043

0.01914.6847.352

0.410

NO Audit Point #1

SO2 Audit level 20.01950.0041

0.01830.0032

-4.5

0.0001

0.0371

0.14710.07320.0354

0.00020.14840.0743

-0.9-1.5

SO2 Audit level 5

Sulfur Dioxide

SO2 Audit level 7SO2 Audit level 6

SO2 Audit level 4

-8.3

0.1050 0.09910.04090.0169



Converter Efficiency NO2 level 7Converter Efficiency NO2 level 5Converter Efficiency NO2 level 4

-6.2

Pre Zero

NO2 Audit level 2

NO2 Audit level 70.0000

0.04400.0184

0.0387

0.0002 -0.0001

0.0036 0.0027

2.4

0.07610.03800.0200

0.15200.0761

0.15540.0780

0.1520

0.0200

-21.2

-3.3

0.0203

-3.1-3.2

-5.6-7.1

-3.7

-0.00010.14700.0737

0.0000

1.4

0.0001

NOx Audit Point #5

0.0042

0.0042


0.0380 1.8


NOx Audit Point #4

-0.0004 -0.0003

Post Zero -0.0004 0.0000

Post Zero -0.0004 0.0001

Post Zero

Pre Zero

Post Zero

Pre Zero

Pre Zero

Pre Zero

Post Zero

-25.8Post Zero 0.0000

Site Name: Near Road Airs ID: Auditor: Eric Hebert Audit Date: 10/26/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)

Instrument: Ozone CO Instrument:Manufacturer: Thermo TEI Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 42i-TLModel: 49C-PS 48i TLE Property Number:Serial Number: 0517112167 1503464200 Calibration Date:Calibration Date: 09/14/16 Calibrated Slope/Intercept: 0.000 0.000Slope 1.00261 on Indicated Flow:Intercept -0.00015202 day of audit In-Line Filter Change:

Manifold Type:

Pass/Fail Warning WarningPassPassPassPassN/A

Audit Limits

Pass Bias < ±15% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable dFail Bias > ±15% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable


Converter Efficiency Audit LimitsPass Between 96% and 104%Fail <96% or >104%

Warning Between 96%-97% or 103%-104%

Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric HebertPass PrintPassPass SignaturePassPassPassPass EPA person notified in case of audit failurePass

Comments:0

0.0036 0.0040 9.7 97.2%



0.0040



NO2 Audit level 7

NO2 Audit level 2


0.1002

0.0036

0.0000

97.8%

0.0424 -0.9

0.0161 0.0164 1.6 98.8%

0.0428

9.7 97.2%

0.0981 -2.1

-0.0020

97.6%

NOx Audit Point #5

0.0007

NPAP NO2 Concentration (ppm)

Site Response (ppm)

Percent Difference

N/A

Pass/Fail

0.0149

NO Audit Point #3

PRELIMINARY NO2 AUDIT RESULTS

NO Audit Point #2

NO Audit Point #4 NOx Audit Point #4 Pass

NO Audit Point #1

NO Audit Point #5

Converter Efficiency

0.0077

PassPassNOx Audit Point #3

NOx Audit Point #2

NPAP NO Concentration (ppm)

Percent Difference

Site Response (ppm)

NPAP NOX CONCENTRATION (ppm)

0.0149

0.0380

0.0000-0.0004 -0.0004

0.0383 1.10.7

0.01560.0152 2.0

0.0384

SITE RESPONSE (ppm)

Percent Difference

0.0000

0.1545


MOBIL PE LAB INSTRUMENTSNO/NOX

PRELIMINARY NO AUDIT RESULTS PRELIMINARY NOx AUDIT RESULTS

1/4" Teflon

01/00/00

NITROGEN OXIDES REPORT

STATION INTRUMENT INFORMATION

1324658812

010/21/2016

NOx Audit Point #1

0.0077

0.0380

4.4

Pass

0.0001

0.1530

0.0770

0.0000

0.1565

0.0762 1.0

0.1530

0.0762

0.0001

1.0

0.0768 0.7

2.3

Site Name: Near Road Airs ID: Auditor: Eric Hebert Audit Date: 10/26/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)

Instrument: Ozone COManufacturer: Thermo TEIModel: 49C-PS 48i TLESerial Number: 0517112167 1503464200Calibration Date: 09/14/16 CalibratedSlope 1.00261 on Intercept -0.00015202 day of audit

STATION INSTRUMENT INFORMATIONInstrument:Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 48i-TLEProperty Number:Calibration Date:Slope/Intercept: 0.00 0.00Indicated Flow:In-Line Filter Change:Manifold Type:

Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric HebertCO Audit level 6 Pass PrintCO Audit level 5 Pass CO Audit level 5 Pass SignatureCO Audit level 4 Pass CO Audit level 3 Pass Warning

EPA person notified in case of audit failureAudit Limits

Pass Bias < ±15% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable drift (0.4 ppm) Fail Bias > ±15% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable drift (0.4 ppm)


Comments:

3.9

5.2

0

-0.039 0.080

0.742 0.848 14.2

1.442 9.6

7.650

1.581

7.366

3.675

NPAP CO Concentration (ppm)

Site Response (ppm)

Percent Difference

2.5

0.0810.013

14.785 15.150


MOBIL PE LAB INSTRUMENTS

0

CO

CARBON MONOXIDE REPORT

132465881501/00/00

010/21/2016

PRELIMINARY CARBON MONOXIDE AUDIT RESULTS

3.865

Site Name: Near Road Audit Date: 10/26/2016

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

0.0680 Pass0.3650 Pass 0.2840 Pass 0.1900 Pass 0.1390 Pass 0.1055 Pass Warning0.1190 Pass


N/A0.0004 Pass


N/A0.0011 Pass

0.0006-0.0021 Pass -0.0004 Pass 0.0003 Pass 0.0004 Pass0.0008


N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

-0.0004

Post Zero -0.0004 0.0000

Post Zero -0.0004 0.0007

Post Zero

Pre Zero

Post Zero

Pre Zero

Pre Zero

Pre Zero

Post Zero

9.7Post Zero 0.0000

NOx Audit Point #5

0.0077

0.0077


0.0380 0.7


NOx Audit Point #4

1.0

0.0152

0.71.1

-2.1-0.9

4.4

0.00000.15450.0768

0.0006

2.0

0.0008

0.0000

0.04280.0161

0.0383

0.0001 0.0000

0.0036 0.0040

1.0

0.07620.03800.0149

0.15300.0762

0.15650.0770

0.1530

0.0149

SO2 Audit level 4

1.6

0.1002 0.09810.04240.0164




Pre Zero

NO2 Audit level 2

NO2 Audit level 7


0.0371

0.00010.14940.0745

SO2 Audit level 5

Sulfur Dioxide


9.614.2

2.3

Oxides of Nitrogen

-0.039

0.01314.7857.366

5.23.865

0.7421.5810.8480.080

0.081



0.0001

NO Audit Point #5


1.442


Ozone



(ppm)



Pre Zero

Percent Difference

Absolute Difference

(ppm)Warning


Carbon Monoxide


Pass/Fail

3.675

15.150CO Audit level 6 2.57.650 3.9

APPENDIX B

Maps of Locations

feetmeters

1000400

feetmeters

1000400

feetmeters

1000500

feetmeters

1000400

feetmeters

3000900

APPENDIX C

Audit Standards Certifications

Site Name: EPA R-7 Audit Date: 9/15/2016

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

-0.0005 Pass0.0190 Pass 0.0310 Pass 0.0280 Pass 0.0170 Pass 0.0170 Pass 0.0340 Pass

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/A

-0.0001 Pass-0.0022 Pass -0.0010 Pass -0.0016 Pass Warning-0.0011 Pass-0.0005 Pass0.0000 Pass-0.0001 -0.0001

Post Zero -0.0002

Post Zero -0.0002

Post Zero

Pre Zero

Post Zero

Pre Zero

Pre Zero

Pre Zero

Post Zero

Post Zero 0.0000

NOx Audit Point #5

0.0017

0.0017


0.0067


NOx Audit Point #4

-31.3

0.0000

0.0001

0.01760.00670.0044

0.04470.0176

0.0447

0.0044

SO2 Audit level 2




-25.6

Pre Zero

NO2 Audit level 1

NO2 Audit level 4


0.00320.0011

-24.2

0.0000

0.0066

0.04150.01620.0050

0.00010.04370.0172

-5.0-5.8

SO2 Audit level 3

Sulfur Dioxide


4.010.4

Oxides of Nitrogen

-0.015

0.0054.3241.703

4.30.676

0.1630.4450.1800.019

0.0045


NOx Audit Point #3

0.0001

NO Audit Point #5


0.428


Ozone



(ppm)



Pre Zero

Percent Difference

Absolute Difference

(ppm)Warning


Carbon Monoxide


Pass/Fail

0.648

4.343CO Audit level 5 0.41.734 1.8

Site Name: EPA R-7 Audit Date: 9/14/2016

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

-0.0001 Pass0.0012 Pass 0.0001 Pass 0.0003 Pass 0.0005 Pass 0.0007 Pass0.0007 Pass

-0.0001 Pass0.0012 Pass 0.0001 Pass 0.0004 Pass 0.0006 Pass 0.0007 Pass0.0008 Pass

0.0001-0.0003 Pass 0.0002 Pass 0.0001 Pass 0.0006 Pass0.0000


N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Warning


Carbon Monoxide


Pass/Fail

0.719

CO Audit level 5


Ozone



(ppm)



Pre Zero

Percent Difference

Absolute Difference

(ppm)

NO Audit Point #2


0.0001

NO Audit Point #5


0.482

2.7

Oxides of Nitrogen

-0.072

0.0114.3391.725

0.192

NO Audit Point #1


0.0073

0.00010.04390.0174

SO2 Audit level 3

Sulfur Dioxide


SO2 Audit level 2

3.3

0.0110 0.01070.00720.0031




Pre Zero

NO2 Audit level 1

NO2 Audit level 40.0000

0.00700.0030

0.0077

0.0001 0.0000

0.0010 0.0016

0.6

0.01780.00740.0050

0.04490.0178

0.04610.0179

0.0449

0.0050

2.7

0.0055

0.65.4

-2.72.9

12.0

0.00000.04610.0179

0.0001

10.0

0.0000

NOx Audit Point #5

0.0020 0.0027 35.0

0.0020 0.0027 35.0


0.0074 4.1


NOx Audit Point #4

-0.0007

Post Zero -0.0007 0.0000

Post Zero -0.0007 0.0001

Post Zero

Pre Zero

Post Zero

Pre Zero

Pre Zero

Pre Zero

Post Zero

60.0Post Zero 0.0000

Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells

Date 1/20/2016 Date 1/21/2016 Date 1/22/2016 Date 1/23/2016 Date 1/28/2016 Date 9/14/2016

m1 1/20/2016 0.999929 m1 1/21/2016 0.996503 m1 1/22/2016 0.998195 m1 1/23/2016 0.999917 m1 1/28/2016 1.00770 m1 9/14/2016 1.01342

m2 1/19/2016 1.00076 m2 1/20/2016 0.99993 m2 1/21/2016 0.99650 m2 1/22/2016 0.99820 m2 1/23/2016 0.99992 m2 1/28/2016 1.00770

m3 1/18/2016 0.99819 m3 1/19/2016 1.00076 m3 1/20/2016 0.99993 m3 1/21/2016 0.99650 m3 1/22/2016 0.99820 m3 1/23/2016 0.99992

m4 9/21/2015 1.02307 m4 1/18/2016 0.99819 m4 1/19/2016 1.00076 m4 1/20/2016 0.99993 m4 1/21/2016 0.99650 m4 1/22/2016 0.99820

m5 4/29/2015 1.02260 m5 9/21/2015 1.02307 m5 1/18/2016 0.99819 m5 1/19/2016 1.00076 m5 1/20/2016 0.99993 m5 1/21/2016 0.99650

m6 1/7/2015 1.02050 m6 4/29/2015 1.02260 m6 9/21/2015 1.02307 m6 1/18/2016 0.99819 m6 1/19/2016 1.00076 m6 1/20/2016 0.99993

I1 1/20/2016 -0.418899 I1 1/21/2016 -0.323250 I1 1/22/2016 -0.384025 I1 1/23/2016 -0.335463 I1 1/28/2016 0.22470 I1 9/14/2016 0.32479

I2 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I2 1/20/2016 -0.41890 I2 1/21/2016 -0.32325 I2 1/22/2016 -0.38403 I2 1/23/2016 -0.33546 I2 1/28/2016 0.22470

I3 1/18/2016 -0.27641 I3 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I3 1/20/2016 -0.41890 I3 1/21/2016 -0.32325 I3 1/22/2016 -0.38403 I3 1/23/2016 -0.33546

I4 9/21/2015 -0.26399 I4 1/18/2016 -0.27641 I4 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I4 1/20/2016 -0.41890 I4 1/21/2016 -0.32325 I4 1/22/2016 -0.38403

I5 4/29/2015 -0.20400 I5 9/21/2015 -0.26399 I5 1/18/2016 -0.27641 I5 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I5 1/20/2016 -0.41890 I5 1/21/2016 -0.32325

I6 1/7/2015 -0.34620 I6 4/29/2015 -0.20400 I6 9/21/2015 -0.26399 I6 1/18/2016 -0.27641 I6 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I6 1/20/2016 -0.41890

Average m 1/20/2016 1.01084 Average m 1/21/2016 1.00684 Average m 1/22/2016 1.00278 Average m 1/23/2016 0.99892 Average m 1/28/2016 1.00050 Average m 9/14/2016 1.00261

Avarage I 1/20/2016 -0.33383 Avarage I 1/21/2016 -0.33001 Avarage I 1/22/2016 -0.36001 Avarage I 1/23/2016 -0.37193 Avarage I 1/28/2016 -0.28841 Avarage I 9/14/2016 -0.15202

s m (%) 1/20/2016 1.22 s m (%) 1/21/2016 1.24 s m (%) 1/22/2016 1.00 s m (%) 1/23/2016 0.16 s m (%) 1/28/2016 0.38 s m (%) 9/14/2016 0.65

s I (ppb) 1/20/2016 0.1 s I (ppb) 1/21/2016 0.1 s I (ppb) 1/22/2016 0.1 s I (ppb) 1/23/2016 0.1 s I (ppb) 1/28/2016 0.3 s I (ppb) 9/14/2016 0.3

Test s m 1/20/2016 PASS Test s m 1/21/2016 PASS Test s m 1/22/2016 PASS Test s m 1/23/2016 PASS Test s m 1/28/2016 PASS Test s m 9/14/2016 PASS

Test s I 1/20/2016 PASS Test s I 1/21/2016 PASS Test s I 1/22/2016 PASS Test s I 1/23/2016 PASS Test s I 1/28/2016 PASS Test s I 9/14/2016 PASS

EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 011136-day calibration 6-day calibration 6-day calibration 6-day calibration Verification Verification

At EEMS 1/20/2016 At EEMS 1/21/2016 At EEMS 1/22/2016 At EEMS 1/23/2016 At EPA R4 1/28/2016 At EPA R7 9/14/2016offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2span = 1.015 span = 1.015 span = 1.015 span = 1.015 span = 1.015 span = 1.015

cell next to "Date". S/N = 0517112167S/N = 0517112167

Enter date in yellow highlightedEnter date in yellow highlightedcell next to "Date".

S/N = 0517112167

Enter date in yellow highlightedcell next to "Date".


S/N = 0517112167


S/N = 0517112167


S/N = 0517112167

51100

mSm

26

1

6

1

2

61

i iii mm

26

1

6

1

2

61

i iii II5

1

IS

51100

mSm

26

1

6

1

2

61

i iii mm

26

1

6

1

2

61

i iii II5

1

IS

Documents

2016-10 Nashville Metro Report - Tennessee...Nashville Metro Public Health Department Air Monitoring Network Prepared for: Nashville Metro Public Health Department 2500 Charlotte Ave