24
2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium

Tax (professional) decision making

Anne M. Magro

George Mason University

Page 2: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

OVERVIEW

Who are the major players in tax DM settings? What data are available or can be acquired? What does the experimental research methodology

bring to the table? Which DMs/decisions could we study using

experiments? Which DMs/decisions have we studied using

experiments and what have we learned? What are the opportunities and challenges in

pursuing experimental tax?

Page 3: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Major Players

Page 4: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Major Players

Page 5: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Major Players

Page 6: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Major Players

Page 7: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Major Players

Page 8: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Available data

Tax data in financial statements tax provision footnotes

Court decisions IRS panel data

Page 9: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Acquirable data

Surveys Field studies Partnerships with taxing authorities Experiments

Page 10: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Acquirable data

Surveys Field studies Partnerships with taxing authorities Experiments

Top three reasons to use experiments…

Page 11: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Advantages of experiments

CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL

That control comes from …

Page 12: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Advantages of experiments

CONTROL

Rigor is up front. Design of environment Manipulated variables Random assignment to treatments

What that rigor does for us …

Page 13: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Advantages of experiments

CONTROL Rigor is up front

It allows us to test theory talk about causation Test environments/policies that do not exist

But at the expense of …

Page 14: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Advantages/disadvantages of experiments

CONTROL Rigor is up front Test theory Talk about causation Test new environments/policies

Decreased external validity

Page 15: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

DMs we could study with experiments

Page 16: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

DMs we have studied experimentally

Page 17: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Behavioral tax publications 1992-2012

Journal Tax pros Taxpayers others

TAR 6 3 0

JAR 1 0 0

JAE 0 0 0

CAR 1 5 0

AOS 1 0 0

RAST 0 0 0

JATA 14.5 24.5 3

BRIA 6 4 1

Page 18: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University
Page 19: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Tax Professional DM: TasksTransaction-based DM:

Fact identification

Issue identification

Information identification

Search

Selection

Stopping rules

Information evaluation

Information weighting

Analogical reasoning

Info characteristics combination

Transaction structure recommendation

Transaction structure identification

Risk assessment

Transaction selection

Reporting option recommendation

Option identification

Risk assessment

Option selection

Practice-based DM:

Documentation/justification

Client communications

Practice management

Client selection

Client retention

Review process

Negotiations

Clients

IRS

Professional. staff management/development

Training

Staffing

Time budgeting

Time recording

Outsourcing

Tax Risk Management

Page 20: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Tax Professionals DM: Individual/Task/Environment FactorsDynamic information

Teams

Groups

Hierarchical teams

Expertise

Experience

Incentives

Knowledge/memory

Planning/compliance

Complexity

Ambiguity

Justifiability demands

Creativity

Client preferences

Accountability

Information order/presentation

Decision aids

Practice risk

Regulatory environment

Professional standards

Government regulation

Support thresholds

Penalties

Reporting requirements

Client characteristics

Litigation risk

Time pressure

Outsourcing

Certification

Ethics

Financial reporting

Risk preferences

Client advocacy

Page 21: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Other parties

TASKS

FIN 48 analyses

Auditors

Tax pros

Financial accountants

Negotiations and settlements – IRS

Applying the law – Judges and juries

Investment decisions – investors

Purchasing decisions – customers

Voting patterns – voters

INDIVIDUAL/TASK/

ENVIRONMENT

Knowledge

Experience

Expertise

Incentives

Complexity

Ambiguity

Risk

Etc….

Page 22: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Opportunities in experimental tax Tax is a unique setting So much has not been done!!!

Within tax professional domainWithin taxpayer domainWithin domain of other DMs

Relatively small number of researchers Terrific community of scholars

ATA Mid-year Meeting and JATA Conference ABO Research ConferenceBehavioral Tax Symposium

Page 23: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Challenges in experimental tax

Tax is a unique setting So much has not been done!!! Relatively small number of researchers Access to professional participants is limited Doing good work is hard Overcoming bias against experimental work

Page 24: 2012 ATA Doctoral Consortium Tax (professional) decision making Anne M. Magro George Mason University

Literature Reviews

Taxpayer Decision Making• Jackson and Milliron. 1986. Journal of Accounting Literature• Cuccia. 1994. Journal of Accounting Literature

Tax Professional Decision Making• Shields, Solomon and Jackson.1995. Book Chapter.

Behavioral Tax Research: Prospects and Judgment Calls• Roberts. 1998. Journal of the American Accounting

Association