l*,1o

ParoleEoard'roilirr,ondes lib€rationsof Canada conditionnelles du Canada

Chairperson Prdsident

410 l€ul€r Avenue WestOttasa, ON K1A oRl

Document Released Under the Access to

H:lll'l: i:j i"".:'J ffiillH :ii P; " e n ve rt u

MCU PS I UCM SPReceived / Regu

M""- 0 1 2013

APR 2 { 2013

The,Honourable Vic Toews, P.C., Q.C., M.P.

Minister of Public Safety269 Laurier Avenge WestOttawa, OntarioKlAOPS

Re: Parofe Boatd of Ganada video for victims

Dear Minister,

1fi5 my pleasure to present to you a new information video for victims, Parote Board ofCanada: Victim Services.

Available on-line, the video informs viCtims of the options they have at the Board. ltshows how a hearing works and directs victims to other Boarcl information, such as our

website and toll-free victim information line.

At the FBC, we believe Victims should, if they choose, have a role in the conditional

release process, including the right to attend and present a statement at a parole

hearing as now enshrined in law. We believe victims have the right to information, and

under the Corrections and Conditional Release Acf, the Board routinely shares

information about offenders with registered victims that Would othenvise be protected

under the Privacy Act.

Sec. $erv. PSlSsrv, Soc, SPRecelvcd / Regut

ei'.J 01 2013

C;anadHA-2013-00021

1. Document Released Under the Access to

_2. Him:li:jj3:?ffiil1fl:iiy":" en verru

This stan-oe of openness and transparency suppprts our public safety mandate. This iswhy we continue to reach out to vietirn organizalions and to work with the ConectionalSeMce of Canada to streamline victim information services.

I hope and trust you willfind this video a useful addition to the Pubtig S-afety portfoliosuite of communimtigns products for victims.

Harvey CenalkoChairperson, Parole Board of Canada

cc. Andrew House, Chief of Staff

Encl.

Gnadfr

l*l 9ru:ni:^' ffu:lm*O

To

A

The Honourable Vic Toews, P.C., M.P.Minister of Public Safety

ChairpersonParole Board of Canada

the contents of this report at your convenience.

c,c.: Shawn Tupper, Assistant Deputy Minister of Public Safety

Document Released Under ihe Access to

MEMoffi ;H?l ft#'HHH$6!s; o en ve1 u

s€lcurity Glassmcation - Classiftcation de s6cudt6

uN cLess; a'€Df,ur File - Notre r6f6rence

3-or3-o{ 93oYOUr Frle ' VOre reterenco

)a'e sil 06.?015

eJ;.*,Flla No,

cf,fia,s

oTILT

From

De

II

_l

I

-J_l

JSublectObjet

Monthlv-'lDashboard" ort Recbrd QHspEnsion.Ooerations and Deciqions,and Backloo

As requested, please find attached the Monthly Dashboard report on Record Suspensionfor fiscaf 2013-14. lncluded with this reporting is a separate "Dashboard" progress ondecision making in relation to the backlog.

The record suspension report covens.the first month of the new tiscal year. During thatperiod the PBC has received 1,643 applications and accepted,.8O1 with no decisions made.The PBC still has 5,861 applications in process from the preVious year with 959 with aBoard member foi decision

As for the backlog, there remains 20,657 active files with 77A wfth Board members for:decision.

r::5J:smMi"' 0 0 2013

I am available to further

B=F$=PrJ

=s gdu,0 3rJ1t#P:i-oX \-O)

E'F g$,H

b

-:J:l*'g I]i FF-1

3 +3E5 CI

ssF(D' nig8CI;l

lrsiNl6

c.rbf)we&

<Es

('!&

F:s.

hI&{/,J

Ow'sq +fr"ec H-S

liEt+Irrlo-Fislslrall%le1f;.tp.lsiliiEll*i

lHilh|l,rad I

a

s)

a,\: o:: +)* u:;i 1

<l)

s,ag

6

&o-il.,t.A

EI

,,;) 2C9, d'ql 4

0aB}

:vr*lil

cr

""1

rov1

\.N fi

s8.o

F*)Pe

II

iifs;i Fs.r.{o)i r.q

,AF !,;s a sbLj

€!iE;q.$d

E'3ar 9L

^t'- /n@ 6

FA Briiq '5SYs !:YfoH d *xo o

u; J € * fS34 trA!sF; +615 x u *F R5;f si3E4; ;bS);a65:3iui.s.s fr s xl$ a a El?p:,$nsR:d- HRi: tS'

!E Clnilq

E

a'n

Foo<te5

,l' ,//'/,/tl2{*9 d&s i'l

$i i g.* $f'g

{t,,; ,

e.E:

fr:Zi::.4:

rooooo

grigg$g

4' a5 "g'fr r"'7, 'F

.HH $ * 5 $#HHft:Bg*'fi{[fi$$EgfE#'89"$ *"8

qs,.{gFd

mF't

AI

rs.aJ4tgl

':..;lL; ''J3if rhl

g

.gIB

"ca

{J

&.

'Bt-

=efr)g

ff: f{A fi}fl) .tr)11 a.

!f*

Y ffiX<luJ -+.rE}Fffi

f". '-*:i:T) hi*+r kG) r -lJ-ffiffc

r,*)* P-^

;{ ,$€Xt^r{1 v

ffi n'$ifs-- X_Qx 6s,ts-r/ *{' !-|i&-1

e.g v)g6If- r- *):?f$!l o-JJF O

{lL'xLEJ E L,'

tiq,

F$q{

tuF

tu

rtBicU

lsEJ

.*

$J

a

qr,,Sr'qo

rJSl

1;$Q'p

8es^,rD

cervs

asg

qJ

oBies,F.fIr{E

E*p

#gb

l&E

,$.

I

ed

B

ub

Ti€

e

sF

|t3

:::'::':::ii

'!,,i

r:1!r :::6t{> :::

gsne.p'ii?raF3o,6*,

1

\\

?idxE.:uo

0

E,gc ^=:c?f iirtE1U.!E

i

S,F?i:2546fo

Io

Iz

b

q.l

rqI

f4r"l

8\i

a@.p

t;ffi l'rtaa Itl:

R*i

-a^FLq

*at5

s.-

&3d

rN

€3rfi

s

fn.'l?g

r.l

0.1{

3,J)UIU

a

#IE

=rLL

l&

srv('l!"{enl4rQ

;r

w

m!

?u

trJ

4l

ffi**um*r:t ffisl**sse{ Ur""le*sn th* Aee*ss to0nf*rn"rmti*n A*t 1 ffi*curvrsr:t divulgu* en vsrtu

, ,

Pardons Granted Pardons Denied Suspensions Orderedl Suspensions Refused

2013-08-01 35 1. z z

2013-08-02 19 I 6 0

2013-08-03 0 0 b 0

20r3-08-04 0 0 2 0

2013-08-05 0 n 38 1

2013-08-06 43 1" 80 3

2013-08-07 83 2 68 3

20r3-08-08 L25 I 39 5

2013-08-09 12 3 93 3

2013-08-10 L 0 q 0

2013-08-11 1 n LC 0

2013-08-12 59 1 46 ?

201,3-08-13 78 3 52 z

20t3-08-14 76 1 33 4

2013-08-15 41. 2 1.3 3

2013-08-16 39 2 2A 4I

2013-08-17 0 L 0

2013-08-18 1 at 10 n

2013-08-19 33 I 49 0

2013-08-20 L8 L 27

2013-08-21 17 tl 4 1.

2013-08-22 )A 2 26 4

2013-08-23 28 4 18 1

2At3-08-24 2 0 z o

2013-08-25 17 0 5 0

2013-08-26 1.08 5 57 z

2013-08-27 94 5 35 6

2013-08-28 1 1.3 55 4

20r3-08-29 1.O7 1 33 1.2

2013-08-30 0 I 1,2 0

2013-08-31 0 0 0 0

Total: L177 45 851 55

A-2013-00024

00001

Document Releaised UnderInformation Act / Document

the Accessdivulgue en

tovertu

egeds d l'iPardons Granted Pardons Denied Suspensions Ordened Suqnpncinnc Qaf,..^,r20t.3-09{1 r0 12013-09-02 22 n 82013-09-03 1.80 I 382013-09-04 93

75 al2013-09-0s 88 71 52|)1 ?-no-nc84 I 5.rrtJ-w-ul 18 n 2 fi2013-09-081.8 1 18 rl2C)l3-09-09 L34 35 1zcr13-09-10 93 30 0Tnrl t-nq-5 9 1Au.r'-wt-.lz t6 l- 3 z2013-09-13 9C 1 3(2013-09-14

U o2013-09-1s n 0

cU20:13-09-16 50 1 4 320r3-09-17 23 5 38 4

18 5 39 12013-09-19 29 15 32oJr3-09-20 47 0 17201t3-09-21 z/ 'J. t 0207.3-09-22 48 o o nzo73-09-23 61 6 272073-A9-24 47

85 q2013-09-25 6R I 1182013-09-26 1

36 5szms-49-27 5L 1 70 L2013-09-28 28

31201:3-09-29 23 n 47201:]-09-30 67 I 46Total: 1518 593

1048 71

00002

t**umsnt ffi.els*sed LindsnEnf*rrnati*n Act 1 ilaeument

th* Aec*ss todivulgu* en vertu

2

Pardons Granted Pardons Denied Suspensions Ordered Suspensions Refused

201:3-l.O-01 20 4 51 2

201:3-:t0-02 27 L 33 5

201,3-10-03 31 1 54 7

2013-10-04 54 3 39 11

20x:3-t0-05 28 n 17 0

201:3-:10-06 6 I 16 0

201,3-:10{7 54 3 83 4

201:3-:10-08 32 I 39 2

201:3-;1,0-09 23 U 28 R

201:3-10-10 27 L 55 4

201it-:t 0-11 27 1 25 5

20113-:10-12 l" U 3 0

20Lil-:to-13 n n 0 0

201:3-:[0-14 15 3 30 0

201:3-r0-15 25 1r 29 3

201:3-10-16 21 0 43 'l

20I'"J-:LO-77 21 2 34 3

201:3-:10-18 44 5 23 0

201:3-10-19 22 2 18 o

201:3-10-20 0 0 I 0

207ir-1.0-21 32 z 40 5

207:r-:lo-22 29 6 28

201:]-r0-23 34 3 39 5

201:3-10-24 3.3 0 L9 1

201:'-:Lo-25 2 0 30 1.

201:l-:t0-26 26 5 29 2

20tit-1"o-27 3 0 24 3

201:l-L0-28 L9 1 22 5

201:l-10-29 24 7 37 5

201,1-I0-30 18 3 54 3

201:]-10-31 48 4 27 5

Total r 726 60 978 102

00003

Document Released Underf nformation Act / Document

the Accessdivulgue en

tovertu

l'infnrmqtinrrAPardons Granted Pardons Denied Suspensions Ordered Susoensionr Rofircorf

:10:13-11-01 6 5 so 2210::13-tt-02 15 ,|

13 12r013-11-03 102C

1,20n3-11-04 37 50 22013-11-05 61 3s 520t.3-11-06 17 .lf 35 12013-17-07 8 4 24 I

,L

2013-11-08 oL 10

2r013-1149 33 c 0 02t013-11-10 c 1 L2 U2013-11-11 10 3 0 1.2013-11-12 17 l- 23 .t

J.2013-11-13 2T 1L 9 .L2013-11-14 23 20 :I201:'-11-15 r.8 L 3 .',

201:t-11.16J 20

Iz0t1.at-Lt-77 0 3220tt3-11-tt 29 2 34 :t20r13-11-19 22 1 23 .,20r13-11-20 21 1 222013-11-21 38 3 542013-11-22 50 1 322073-tt-23 30 1 820L3-tt-24 32 0 o

{2013-11-25 ?8 5 5020.13-7t-26 B 1 1720'.13-17-27 4J 5 3120:1.3-11-28 22 L 52 J2013-11-29 z 1. 2s L20:13-11-30 9 0 18 1Total: 643 49

"t2859

00004

Dncument ffi.slsms*d {"-f nd*n ths Aeeess t*lnfnrrxati*n A*t / il**urnsnt divulgue err vertu

5s m l'lnfcnrnati$ & l'tRt0rmatt0n.Pardons Granted Pardons Denied Suspensions Ordered Suspensions Refused

2013-1.2-01 14 n 22 1"

20rit-72-02 25 0 24 aL

2013-12-03 3€ 1 33 )20tit-L2-o4 17 J 13 4

z0tit-72-o5 T9 4 18 4

2013-12-06 54 2 5 2

20t21-72-O7 24 n 19 3

2013-1.2-08 2C U 12 0

2013-1.2-09 31 3-f z

201it-L2-!0 1€ 4 o 2

2074t-7.2-LL LC 20 L3 7

z0Lrl-7.2-LZ 1.4 15 0

20Lit-L2-13 C L 0

zal:rt-12-t4 13 3 13 0

201:r-1.2-1s 6 3 n 0

20L3a-1.2-L6 42 8 74 12

20t2t-7.2-77 35 2 28

zal:rt-1.2-L8 7L 3 1-L aI

201:t-12-79 23 z 2t 1

20t2t-t2-20 30 z d f,

20t3t-12-21 19 c 5 t,

20L3r-L2-22 b 1L 6 0

2073t-12-23 15 3 4

20t3rt2-24 4 L 22 2

20t3t-72-25 n L2 0

2At3-\2-26 17 f 4

2073t-L2-27 1.1 3 20 3

2073t-L2-28 7 1 T

20L3t-12-29 0 U 20 2

2073t-t2-30 t5 2 37 7

20t3rl2-37 1n 2 18 tTotal: 504 83 tl40 86

00005

***umsnt Rmlsms*d Un"ldsn the Aecss$8r:f*nnr*ti*n Act 1 ilSccummnt divulgue endm lm {-*i sun l'aneeis a l'infcrryaAti$Atrz

trr

vsrtuParole Board of CanadaPerformance Measurement

lmportant Notice: The above outcome rates provide information on the performance of offenders onconditional release from the gtart-of the. supervision peiiou. unlii tn" "no

of the period of supervision, Thestatistics refer to supervision Perlods (;rot tho * br oneno-eofJn"" arn offender may have morethan one supervisions perlods.

[ti?tftff";:5,:t3lifi: onlv those offenders serying determinat€ s€ntences, as offsnders servins indor€rminate senrences

p q6

8.o*

ii,=>

<6

o

o

u

o

o

zo

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

oJo

o

o

o

oo

(n

odo

;o

o

o

;oco

c

o

o

z

o

o

o

oof.

oooo

o

u

ooe.o

N

P

tr&

l:iJ

li$

f*l$Is?

h$

r#

;*

,ffi

o

o

0

o

o

(O

',2

o

o

9r

oo

o

oco

o

5o

oOJ

oco

ooo

(n

oo

;o

o

o

=o

o

q

o

oo

z

o

gl

o

o

o

q,6oo

o

=no

o6

o

N

N

@N

O o@

Aq

I

:O o o

N u

o

tsu)

ow

N \ u@

!J-C'l

To

N () 5O)

mN 5

q u 5{ !

ol o

oo

$

cll uJ\,

O)o

@ o ! !

e!

ro5 c)

@qAF !

u o N@

('r@ (r

j-

N@ {

J-P.F

ooN

@No us

\o \No N

! FNN

boN

n

N (nu N

q 00\N

i!N

;-N

Ol0O)

o(D

3o

N@

hol!

! N

q

!o@ N

o

o

OlNN

F(o c)5@

!u(o @

ooo3

o Ooo b

o

j-

{

z

Jo

O)AOl

uOr N

@a

No

o

os q @

!

\t tsu{

oooo3o

\q tsNJqJ

(pN

Vl

9oqJ

00

soH(o(o

{s\

{

NoPa A qJ

b UrqJ l\r

lilro6t\l

loAi\

.9t\a\

-o5N

9!tso!oo)Ho

a-+f

rio

5:xooa If

:oj6o3fgOJaooo!-

o<

3-iRot.o<oof,

E.e5o

=;'5dio ii.

=.ooo;z';o=.s3€-f

o@<=t

oa ro,^o

;<o^-=5aris"i'-='HYN'40on

{t.OF

IO:o

>Eoo6'e9- o

c3o+=oooa

N

t^

coE

oNoNr{m-c(JLo

oPo.5oooN

I

:

:,i

6|...LN

roC\l

:1,,:

:"ii

1|:

$i

; i,ia: i.:i

:':,

:ik

!iliii:,

".

iri

omf-

(of.)

mN(oH

N(n

j;irl

: l'i:

tl:t!!

il:i

iiil

ii'

lii'i.lii

)1:tl

::

1.,

(o Os

llr

I

lrii

li]l

mF\

N

I

omm

r$N

:

Ln01

N

CllFn

(\rN

cn

@

OoNan

mO)

N

rn\om

(o

mr(oN

ms

:,

(o(oF.-

rN

r

oOlN

T\<f(nrl

m\osd

md

.f(o

6loNd

rrnd

o o rl-.

sirnN

N

rN6o)

mm$J

oim

o<tN

n00N

rOl

N

(o

N d

c'roo

N

nln

m(ov

Or

m

G

6

Ln

NN

t\rq N

N

nol n

N

(o mOt

F-.

g(o

N

N

|...

o)nO)

NcoI

v

N

sd

N

OtF-N

$N

NF-N

sJN

srN

OlOl

ml-.N

md

a0,

rLn('r no (o

00<tN o

N n NstN

++F\

F\

N$o

nc')F-

6

mNFmN

F-d@

$@N

OlOro

F\rnNN

dcnr

+;NN

N

roro<i'N

m

Eo

z

mqN

(\ €nm

scn o

f)Ol

Cll

dF- N(o

<fF-ol

dlnN

r\0 N

mNF\

<i'N

N

mN

NNom

o)mN

NNN

nNF-J

nOl

Nn(\J

n(oN

6

F\

o

N@NN

'q('lrs

nod

oN

@r N@m

@nm

oN

NNN

Nom

mo1

N

Olr)HnolN

crr

NN

oN

NNtri

(oNmN

@rroloNN

oOl N

N

crtom

o,llEOJ

o

Ol

d

rfrot\

@rcn

sN

Nnd

NN

r<tsl

ns mNmd

Frroo*o

('loN

N

mn

rrNN

sNr

oI(oN

$O)O)

OoN

oc{

@d(ON

@o rmN

o

EoL

EoPooIJI(!

!e|It'oo

F-.m(od

ini:o!d,d

drnm

sfco

d

O o)LNN

<tN

mcn<td

rnn

N

(o\tvnNN

nrodmN

mr

@mooN

NOl

N

@f-$N

N(rl@

s@N

@No

Ncf)$N

Nnd

a')<fn

1ia)!!o,3

vn(oco

c'lNm

N$o

6<f

NmN

F-o F.oo00

r..qOt

LN@m

rnON

oN(o <t

N

fntod

l-.600N

c\tdc{

6@N

N(\N

F.d(oN

<tN s

oN$

N]O

ClrnNN m

d

rnd

Nc{

(omod

Nro nN

ooon n$

N

mNold

N@ON

omnd

Nr6cn

nNoN

6@

m

msN

Olo6

(oomN

om@

orJou:

ilo.9o.o-

Nn(otro N(o

rnv(ON

cnc|l<i

cfl6 n rn lo

nlnc'r

nNN

N\rLn

(o

OlN

mNN

<rdl--N

r6

N

@Ol00N

Ln

N N

rN

N

nN$N

oc\l

N

@O)$

mN(OJ

r0

O)

<f,+nOlf"d

(o 6 o(o

N

mnNLn

Nc|l

co<f,

Nco

ncnnN

oOco

rNNN

m@ro

gol-rm

N6coN

nOrO

gromN

v<t

Nqr|N

(oN

$n

N

N

0.O

0d

oOo@

N

NFl

N

16o'ooE

!C]

oo

(noNNooN

o

OoG

oooa

sl

Nm

N

o'6ooE.

oooo

6oNsoN

oo@E

0)

ooo

(oooNlnoN

'oO

oot

-oooo

roN(o

N

CJ

Ood

OJ

o@ oo

Nr-ooN

EO

00E

Eooo ol

oFI@

N

o'O

oG

0oOoo

.{Nq)

N

€o'oJ

oE

a@

oo

NodoN

Eooot

oo*NdoNi

N

ql

'0aOG

0oo

;F.QO

:P656 E

€ .q.xr

-91:6

F6696 0r:6o; o

3

aiB

B

9Jt':I

a

s!a)5

IAJBt

oa)3.t.a;roo.soHO.9q,+l:FJaoq{3OJ

t:a.)

--

!o

-SJ

a)

.n

Nftlq

Itr

o

*

l!ltulcLlol5lvrlol-

OJ5

CL

0o5oCL

ao:JJ

T':.tsNoooclC

o

OJ

at

(l,t

!'Nc)tsAET

:J

s9lq!diD og

*E S

a.q;oda@<6

o(D

c)

liItlll(IF

T(D

o

NFrc)N'

tsoof,oo-

C)o:J

t9

o(oNotso

oJo'

6)of,

TW

o6No(o

o:.(D

6)o

NooNoo@

oof.rD

6)D5

oNoov

0(Df,6'

6}oJ

Noo(,

oo!

rDfrD

Noo5Nogr

orDf,6'

6)of

Nooq,Noo5

IoJrDo

ooJ

NoolvNoq,

oof6

6)oJ

NootsNo19

IoJ.Do_

oof

N

o19oF

N5N(! (o 5 No

NtsOt 5 \

A F\

LN

!lv UJ

wou

I

[,

J.A

(rrts

s 5 Ol!

O)

f.

(rlN

UJc!

ts!

F(o

N

(oFJ

u 5

P(DUJ 5

C^J@N Ltl

NJts5

(o(rl

PNJ5(! (!

(J FN

ts(/lNN

0,

3o

tsts-Jw ::

Na 5 Ol

Ol ol(D ol F

N! ql

ro

FN5

!

NNJ

NJP

OlN

(ol.Js (o N cll ul

NNIn5

o

P!

N

!N)(l)

N

! 5!

N)oo 5

{FqJ NJ

gJ(tlw :ilr

i:itlUJ

tsNF(r) LN

5NJ ts

(!5Ols

(p5 UJ

e

F

5Fts

H

\tsAa

P NA

1..)

(,\ (!

N

-J

5(o

FLNOl

P5

L!@ H

5('l(o (o

FO)a

\P-J

(oO)

F5C!

FNJOr

NNJ

Nrc,

(o(/l

FOi!A

\@

Nw(n5 F

(^){

l'i!,

'::,

Ptsol P

Ol

UJ(tl rl Pts

!@

P(n

PNJ

mP(l) 5

N

NwL^)

!!(rl

o3

N('o

-Fl.J\

;ii

irl

(D

NJs (!5

co(, @(o

NJ\j F\{

! 5

ts(,!

1i

t:i

il:1,:

li:,,!1

ilr,

a{-Jo)

lfl,. ,tl:li r:l

iij ,:lri : :,1

;'"li{i: lll

fiil

i. lL

iil

19N

F(n

P5

ru1

!u

NAN{ Ol

A

noID

NJC'l

orNJp

5U

NJNJ

LN!H

5oo

5

F

{(n (tl

FLN

{ tsUJ

(.nUJ

P

5NJ

N)(.!

o) U

'lrl

,l

II :l.:"1

:l,,I

r.l

..,, 1: r,l

',1-]:|

:ll_

.l

,|]

,l,:,1

,,1

i'l ,tl

HOlA

izrfo:l

tsNJ

FU

}J(tl

Ns UJUJ

NJ(o 5P

N@NJ(n !

N(!(n! u NJ

@

iil)t)

Ll

;ii

P

NJ

(, (!!

UJ

UJL!

N(!ul u

5Fol

\(oc'l

O)O)

(Joa1o:J

o

T!A

s 5\\

UJP

NJ\j (n NJA

wFNJ!

ts 5uj O)

m(n N.)

ts

A NJ ! NJ(n(oN

5a\ ;l

,A (lJ \ PN

ol!tn

I

(tlUJ

OtulP

FoN) oo

ts(noo

UJ

p@

!,5 (/l

U UJNJ

FrU

F.J 5w

rnn)

c:

:t

(t) @

l.JqlN

t,ll

tsgl

I

Il(rl(D

NJ

TUw(!

5!s@

NJN

oo5

I'l

rl

,l NJP D

)o

qJ

\.| 5 5ts!

(o@

't:t!l(l'

3igl(1l-tr

t\,t\)

(^l

{plr

Flhth5rvN)

av5tsgJA ljr

t^tr.l,olN6

l.io

F6A(t

Fow

5s\,1

l l:Ii'lIt.l

'il.lF

oco(rJ(J'lN

:[-

1r

NUJU1N5

Po

ts(rlur F.

@

P55NN

T\,

ts('1Or{ ul

t9

ts5NFgJ

J

6

ooN

olooloo

B6P.E;90o <tbE-9P P.g

!5o

F€ q

3E*

A'A,'€:,--oooI(>n.*H 3i6"Jifff'

Snfnnnt*ti*n A** 1 il3m*ument

3ffiillffi"?d'$ffi:Em Loi sur l'aeees

ISISUE :!!; REGORD SUSPENSION PROCESS

qA9KGBoUNq

o The Criminat Records Act (CRA) gives the Board exclusive jurisdiction and absolute

discretion to order, refuse to order and to deny a record suspension for offences

under a FederalAct or Regulation. .

o The CRA was tast amended in March 2)12.lt establishesi new eligibitity periods:

renders some individuals inadmissible for a record suspension; and, requires the

l]oard to present a report to the Minister three months after the end of each fiscal

yearwhich is to be tabled in Parliament no later than December of that same year.

. Persons applying for a record suspension must now wait 5 years for a conviction ofa summary offence and 10 years for a conviction of an indictable offence.

r lndividuals convicted of more than three offences tried by indictment and for which a

sentence of imprisonment of two years or more was imposed are not admissible to

apply for a record suspension.

. lndividuals convicted of an offence listed in $chedule 1 of the CRA are also

inadmissible to apply for a record suspension. However, an individual can apply ifhe or she can satisff the Board that he or she was not in a position of trust towards

the victim of the offence and the victim was not in a relationship of dependency with

him or her: that he or she did not use, threaten to use or attempt to use violence,

intimidation or coercion in relation to the victim; and that he or she was less than five

years older than the victim.

. As well, the Board shall, within three months after the end of each fiscalyear, submit

to the Minister a report for that year containing the number of applications made; thenumber of decisions made by the Board; the number of record suspensions ordered,categorized by the offence to which they relate and, if applicable, the province ofrcsidence of the applicant; and any other information r€qruips6 by the Minister'

RI

. ln assessing a record suspension request for a summary or indictable conviction, theBoard confiims that the application is eligible as per criteria set out in the CRA. This

includes ensuring that the compulsory waiting period has been completed and thatthe sentence has been satisfied. Satisfaction of sentence includes imprisonment,parole, statutory release, and periods of probation orders. lt also includes payrnents

of allfines including surcharges and victim surcharges as well as restitution and

compensation orders.

en vgffiij

00001

divul

June, 2413

Information Act / Document divulgu6 en vertude la L€i sur I'acces A l'information.

'The Board conducts inquiries and investigations through a multitude of open and$ecure databases to corroborate facts and obtain any otherr relevant informationiabout the applicant. An interview of the applicant is often conducted. Partnerships'with the different criminatljustice participants enables the Eloard to conduct'verifications and investigations on the applicants' criminal activities, history and otherlbehaviours to ensure that the applicant has been, and is still, of good conduct androonsequently meritorious of the record suspension. This allso includes assessinginformation, documents and sources from abroad when applicable.

lFor the purpose of the CRA, good conduct is defined in policy as behaviour that isr:onsistent with, and demonstrates, a lawabiding life-style. The PBC may order orrcfuse to order a record suspension based on the information received from lawenforcement agencies and all other criminaljustice participants regarding suspectedor alleged criminal behaviour by the applicant. This information is used by the Boardwhen rendering a decision.

In the case of a conviction for an indictable offence, the Board must take intoconsideration additional information, The Board must be satisfied that the applicanthas demonstrated that obtaining a record suspension would provide a measurablebenefit and sustain their rehabilitation in society. When considering ordering arecord suspension for these offences, the Board may take into account specificfactors ensuring that the:decision does not bring the administration of justice intodisrepute.

f n fiscaf 2012-2013 the Board has received in excess of 19, 500 applications andhas accepted more than 1 1,500. Generally, these applicants would have receivednon-custodial and provincial sentences (fines, probation). To date, of theappfications accepted 49o/o ila for offences tried by indictment and 510/o areforthose tried summarily. The former are investigated for concluct and are assessed forrneasurable benefit, sustained rehabilitation, and the administration of justice and itspossible disrepute. Allfiles are voted on by at least one Board member, however,files relating to a conviction for a sexualoffence must receive consensus by twoEloard members in order for a pardon to be granted (these files account for less than1o/o oI the overall volume). Additional inquires with local police detachments are alsoc,onducted for these cases.

11'the Board proposes to refuse to order a record suspension, it will notify theapplicant in writing as resuired by statute and advise him/her of the right to makerr:presentations that they believe are relevant, either in writiing or verbally at ahearing if authorized by the Board. Before making its final decision to order or refusettl order a record suspension, the Board will consider any nrpresentation made bythe applicant within a reasonable time (60 days).

June.2013

00002

-.-IIl$a'rfmrnratinn A*t / ffi'n*um*r-lt divulgu* eR vsrtud* lm [-*i sur l'sr**s lh l'infcnrnatl*n.

. Wnen a recoid suspension is ordered, the Board will notity RCMP Criminal Real

I'ime ldentification Services, They willsequester allsuspended convictions frorn the

Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) and in turn, will notify the arrestingpolice force of the record suspension as well as all RCMP detachments. In

addition, the Board will notify the applicant, the court whene the case was heard and

all other justice partners who were involved in the procesri, that a record suspension

has been ordered and request that the file be kept separate and apart'

e F:ederal agencies/departments that have records of convictions must keep thoserecords separate once the record suspension has been ordered. They may notclisclose the information without the permission of the Minister of Public Safety.

Although this applies only to federal records, most provinr:ial and municipal agenciesrestrict access to their records once notified by the Board'

r l-he Minister of Public Safety, before granting disclosure, shall be satisfied that thedisclosure is in the interests of the administration of justic,e or the safety/security ofOanada or any state allied or associated with Canada. Relquest for disclosure aremade to the RCMP who then submits the request to the Department. Most requestsare tabled by Crown Counsel for sentencing purposes.

. '}'he Criminal Records Regulations (CRR) and the CRA require that a notation be

rnade in CPIC to indicate that a sequestered record exists for a sexual offence listed

in Schedule2 of the Act. This information is only made accessible upon request topolice or other authorized body where an individual's criminal record may be

clisclosed only if that person seeks employment to work or volunteer with vulnerablepersons and has given written consent prior to the existence of a record beingverified or disclosed.

BITVOCATION/CESSATION OF A RECORD SUSPEI)|S|ON|

. A record suspension may be revoked by the Board if the person to whom it relates issubsequently convicted of an offence punishable on summary conviction under anl\ct of Parliament or a regulation rnade under an Act of Pilrliament; on evidence tothe satisfaction of the Board that the person is no longer of good conduct; or if theper$on knowingly made a false or deceptive statement or concealed information in

relation to the application for the record suspension. These decisions require a voteby a Board rnember, When proposing to revoke a pardon, the Board will notify theperson and advise that person of his or her right to make representations.

. A record suspension automatically ceases to have effect if the person is

siubsequently convicted of an offence prosecuted by indictment or an offencepunishable either by way of indictment or summary conviction (hybrid offence). Allmilitary indictable offences underthe Nafibnal Defence Acf willalso result in the<;essation of a record suspension. The criminal record is then reactivated in CPICand there is no process or possibility for the person to metke representations,

June,2A13

00003

Information Act / Document divulgue en vertude la LSi sur l'acces A l'information.

The Board may also cease a record suspension if it is convinced by new informationthat the applicant was not eligible at the time the record suspension was initiallyordered.

o Exceptions include section 255 (1) of the CiminalCode (impaired driving) or hybridoffences under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act,the Firearms Acf, Part lllor lV of the Food and Dnugs Acf or lhe Narcotic Contrcl Acf, chapter N-1 of theRevised Stafutes of Canada, 1985, that are punishable either on conviction onindictment or on summary conviction. These offences may be considered by theBoard for a possible revocation, which entails the possibility to make representationsand require a Board Member vote.

KE:v MESSAGES

. The record suspension program takes into consideration the criminal history and thelperson's conduct in every case. More exhaustive assessments are conducted for themore complex and severe cases, as additional requirements are placed on theapplicant and the Board, to establish the merilorious natur,e of the request andreflsUt€ the highest regard for the administration of justice.

. 'fhe record suspension workload is always significant, unpredictable and fluctuatesias many externalfactors can impact both the number of applications received,oniany given day and the volume of data received from partners. Diligence is requirediat all times to ensure that the process works efficiently, with all of the challenges thatit entails as far as resources and service delivery.

. r\s part of the criminaljustice system, the Board relies on ilts relationship with otherjustice partners in order to render just, independent and quality decisions.

June>,2013

00004

I,* [ 3ii"i:.?f" 3"T[,Tffi""?,*:,i1"#:3:'

ISISUE 24: USER FEES - RECORD SUSPENSION

BrlgxgRoluNe

. In 1994-95, the Treasury Board approved the introduction of a user fee forprocessing of a record suspension (at that time the CriminalRecords Acf referred toa pardon) applications. A user fee of $50 was introduced to reduce the overall coststo government by having citizens who use government services pay a portion ofthese services. The fee represented a marginal portion of the costs incurred by theParole Board of Canada (PBC) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) forthis work. The PBC received $35 and the RCMP received $15.

. In the 16 years since the introduction of the user fee, the CIost to process a recordsuspension application rose substantially, however, the $50 fee remainedunchanged. During fiscalyears 2008/09 and 2009/10 the PBC had been workingtowards increasing the user fee to make the program sustainable.

o \Mth the coming into force of Bill C-23A (Limiting Pardons of Senous Crimes Act) onJune 29, 2010, the bench marks used to establish the fee were no longer valid andconsequently the fee became even further out of alignment with the costs to processan application.

. ln the fall of z}1l,the Minister of Public Safety tabled in both Houses of Parliamentan interim, partial cost recovery fee proposalto increase the user fee to $150. TheMinisterial Order, which is the authority to fix the fee of $150, came into effect onDecember 29,2010.

. l'he interim user fee of $150, of which the Board receives $135, covers the Board'sdirect operational costs of processing a pardon under the Criminal Records Act(ARA) prior to amendments made in June 2010.

. In April 2010, the Government announced its intention to implement a new costrecovery modelwhich would recover the cost of processing a pardon application(rather than just the direct costs). The revised cost recovery model will increase thepardon user fee to $631 ($610 to the Board, $15 to the RCMP) and was derivedfrom a detailed assessment of the costs of delivering the pardon system under thenew requirements of the CRA enacted by C23-4.

r These costs did not include one-time start-up costs.

. Consistent with the requirements of the User Fee Acf (Uf:A), the PBC conductedon-line public consultation and consulted with other government departments(OGDs) and external stakeholders from February 10lo 27,201 1 as part of the

lnformation Act / Document divulgu6 en vertude la Loisur l'accds d l'information.

BRIEFING NOTENOTE D'INFORMATION

June,201300005

Information Act / Document divulgu6 en vertude la Loi sur l'accds i l'information.

-2-

proposed increase to $631. As a result of this consultation, 1,086 submissions

Were received with comments on the proposed increase to the user fee,

. f n accordance with lhe llFA, 16 of the 1,086 consulted elected to submit theircomplaint to an Independent Advisory Panel. The panel reviewed the complaints

and submitted a report of its findings to the PBC and complainants.

o 'l'he panel's report and a package prepared by the PBC rr;flecting the results were

submitted for the Ministe/s review. The proposed increase to the user fee wastabled in both Houses of Parliament in February 2O12 and the fee was in force onF:ebruary 23,2012.

STA US

e The fee has now been in place for more than one financial cycle. The consequence

has been a reduction in the votume of applications in comparison to previous years,

however on track based on forecast.

KE|Y MEgSAGES

o The current user fee of $631 will allow the Board to meet lts legislated mandate and

have the record suspension program remain sustainable in the medium term.

o Any future amendments to the Criminal Records Act and increases in both salaries

and operating costs will require the costing estimates to be re-examined and the feeto be revised.

June,201300006

{rtf*rmatl*n A*t I ffi*eument en vertu

t'ipt "li6'ii:f"*o 3"Tif;liH"i,i."iffi:8ffi L*i sun l'mre*s {1$

00007

divul

ls$i$!J!: ADDRESSING THE PARDON BACKLOG

BA,CKGROUND

o The number of Board members was based on the initial assessment conducted during the

costing for record suspensions in 2010 of 28 decisions in a day for files that do not contain a

sexual offence. The latter files take considerably longer at 8 a day but form less that 2Yo ofthe overall volume.

r The Board now has a total "of 20 Board members trained on Pardons and Record Suspensions.

Of those 6 are part-time-Bgard members, 5 are Regional Vice-chairs and the Executive Vice-chair, leaving 8 full-time Board members two of which are mostly dedicated to pardons and

record suspensions. The 6 full+ime Board members remaining are regularly removed frompardons/record suspension decision-making for conditional release.

o An assessment of decision-making over the last fiscal year demonshates that Board members

render on average 12 pardon/record suspension decisions a day. At that rate the Board willneed 72.4 part-time Board members working 7 days every month over 24 months to clear the

existing backlog at a cost of approximately $ 1,431,360.

r ds of May 2013 there remained 19,739 pardon applications being investigated and 997 withEoard members waiting on a decision.

. Work began in earnest, following training, in January 2013. The backlog then was a22,500.In five months that number dropped by 2,761. At that rute,552 per month, the backlogshould be at approximately 14,187 by the end of fiscal2}Wl{.

KErYIIESSAGE9o The PBC is working to eliminate the existing backlog of pardorr applications. It is looking to

fi'ain additional Board members in order to increase its decision making capacity.

Prepared by Denis Ladouceur, Director, Clemency and Record Suspension Division

June,2013s.69(1){s} re {d} A-2013-00016

Inforrnation Act / Document divulgud en vertde la Ldi sur l'accAs A l'information.

No information is vetted on this page.

;{F n :i6'5:ff" :;"'frIlitH""l'*:Ji%'iil3l'

lnformation Act / Document divulgu6 en vertude la Loi sur l'accesFiil8fitffigi".

NOTE D'INFORMATION

|StiUE29:GLEMENCYPRoCESS(Roya|PrerogativeofMercy)

BA,CKGROUND

o The Royal Prerogative of Mercy is a largely discretionary power to apply exceptional

nlmedies under exceptional circumstances to deserving ciases.

o The power to exercise the Royal Prerogative of Mercy for federal offences is vested

in the Governor General of Canada Uyirirtue of the Letters; Patent constituting the

Office of the Governor General (1g47i.In addition, the CriminalCode, section 748,

authorizes the Governor in Councilto grant free or conditional pardons-and748.1

provides authority to order remission of fines, pecuniary pranalties and forfeitures

irnposed under an act of Parliament'

o Clemency requests are, as a rule, forwarded to the Federal Cabinet for a decision

rather than to the Governor Generatwho exercises power only when the.remedy

sought cannot be granted by recourse to the relevant sections on the Criminal Code.

o lnr addition to granting free and conditional pardons, remission of fine, forfeiture and

pecuniary penalty, th-e Governor Generalcan also grant remission of sentence,

respite and relief from prohibition' !,i:

r The Governor General or the Governor in Council may griant clemency.upon

recommendation from any Minister, but normally it comes from the Minister of Public

{iafety.

CLE:MENCY PROCESS

o The parole Board of Canada reviews the applications, conducts investigations, at

the request of the Minister, and subsequently male-s-recommendations to the

Minister. In reviewing clemency applications, the PBC ustls ministerialdirection as

guiding principles wfiicn are mLantto provide for,a fair and equitable process, while

ilnsuriid that clemency is granted only in very exceptional and truly deserving

cases, The princiPles are:> there musi be evidence of substantial injustice or undue hardship;

> each application is strictly examined on its own merits;

> the applicant must have exhausted all other avenues available under the

Criminal Code, or other pertinent legislation (e'g'' CCRA);

> the independence of the judiciary shall be respecteid in that there must be

stronger and more specific grounds to recommend action that would interfere

with a court's decision;> it is intended only for rare cases in which consideration of justice, humanity

and compassion override the normal administrationr of justice; and,

> the decision should not, in any way, increase the penalty for the applicant'

June,2A1300009

lnformation Act / Document divulgue en vertude la Loi sur l'acces d l,information.

-2-

e ln the past the llc generally received less than 25 clemerncy requests per year;however, in2012 alone it received 52 requests. In the last fivb years (20t0g-211\,15 requests have been granted", 5 have been denied, and 107-have Leendiscontinued. The-majority of requests were discontinued either uecause the clientdid not provide sufficient informaiion or proof of excessive hardshijio pioceeo withthe request, or because the Minister deiermined that the clemency reqlest did notwarrant investigation, as the criteria were not met. Currenlly, there are g6 activefiles.

' Amendments to the CriminatRecords Acf (CRA), increasing efigibility periods forcertain offences, has increased the number of those affectdd uf tne Lh"nge. toapply for Clemency. Some have and will argue that the legislaiive chanleestablishes evidence of substantial injustice-and/or undue'-hardship.

v

' The amendments to the CRA contained in the Etiminating Padons forSenousCnmes Aci which came into force on March 13,2012, hive also increased thenumber of clemency requests. By making former sexual offenders ineligible(approximately 2o/o of applicants) and those with more tharr three indictibte offencesineligible (approximately 4o/o of applicants) for a "record suspension" it wilt be arguedthat not only does it cause undue hardship but that these arre cases in whichconsideration of justice, humanity and compassion override the normaladministration of justice. The cases currenily under review include 3 applicants -ineligible due to a Schedule 1 offence and 2 applicants who have been convicted ofmore than 3 indictable offenses. Moreover, inquiries into tlre Clemency and Recordsuspension Division have increased due to the legislative r:hange.

r 'fhe consequence to the PBC is significant and is an unfunded increase in workload.lFurther, it will also increase the volume of reviews being sernt to the Minister fordecision.

KEI|/ tr/tEssAcE

o (]lemency under the Royal Prerogative of Mercy is granted by the Governor General<lr the Governor in Council only in exceptional circumstances.

s.19(1)

s.21(1)(a)

s.21(1)(b)

s.2a(l

June\ 2013

00010

I*l ffim"' ffg;:t*'

Document Released Under the Access to

discuss the contents of this repod at your convenience'

c.c.: Shawn Tupirer, Assistant Oeputy Minister ot Public Safety

A-20{3-00020

t

ro ' The Honourable Vic To€ws, P.c., M.P'A Minister of Publ'tc Safety

---1

J_l

_l

IL

TFmD.

IL

Cheitp€rsonParole Board of ganada

SobtrdObiet

lnformation Act / Document {ivulguS en vertuJ* r r loTTB?Al'bWcd8'5 loihlU'tft ati on'

t€utrly Cla3sifstidl . clsin6[o oa l

)ur Filc - NotE l6f6FM

latt

ilon$h ,.Dashborrd" on REGord Susoonglon ope|ations and Decbions and BaqkligF

As requested, please find attached th€ Monthly Dashboard report on Record Su$Pension

tor fisial 201a-t 4. tncluded with lhis reportlng is a separate "Dashboard' progress on

decision making fn relatlon to tho bad(log.

The record susDension report ooverB the firSt two months of the new tiscal year' During that

oerioO ittJpeC has received 2,900 applications and accepted 1,837 with niR€ tecord

luspensions ora,i:red. The ped sril tris g,993 apptications in process f19m the prevlous

year with 652 with a Board member for decision.

As for the backlog, ther€ remains 19,739 riles at investigation with gg7 with Board membeB

t:

x..,4E

vl

n

,,,i:14*tt:

F,*:2

a

vu:.:.:

D)s

E

2

i::

.i.

fF

'N

:t

g

c

(.:*,

.t

.r.:e:E]

E.

E:(5:

;9:3,:6:

$loctoo

X:s

6^LA

.9!ts

III

\ItI

I6

;:(l

't\cE

tl-!t 1z4o-l>arAE -^;1.i g5\tcg'J*:19!xr;. m1fo.squ u$+ !€;{*Fcx!f f e

1.4

oe8x*(ctftIt rl&*Rl €3 tzra.lld

T"$fr*Fd*,r.*; PXsteeEq"Ll. 14 .I

qf)g$j ,'-1;6g"i-E'E(.is:t -'r

,'xEi8s

fl

.E{*{XgA Y

r*$eH

$'$ $?gi,i!r--9.O)r.

Ef*$s?En$E h

f4i\.{ iQ.lc{isJ4iFiti

yl':-4.t1

'#i

mi*lsiwoa

'Xi*i{{i;

EJ*Xtux*s##s

{Ytr{**.tp.

X

r)

F

-gv,

o<n

'"]q,

s

4t

(3K.4

o15 r+r

H rf.a ':\:

s.lJne

6sF

PIc

E!

{/.<"^-z

(tt

o.

Ooq-#oF.&$.>tFO:i F,

q,&DrB4

FtEEv ./.n /l\o.,v,>;'c, lii

Itx

{0

of .."

''P E+g"ue'i:;**$B

I

fcc)g

afiavrE.E ;9olh{tv

_J .'P(t)r.-i=iO tr-+Jho) c.llECI-c.-

L

J J,rn/\XOU)H o'liQ-- 5tuil $4) > .L-fy' -\ L-(-fE0.,96 qt- r- -Jtt$U a) --qE a.'u: -o

(9oooo

I h trD: i .grl: .t il:

iE$g$€$$

i$fBtiegis$ ra$Eg; . , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . ,

i---1l=lis fifr1i$ *-fis EliE r,lie 4liA qii; gi * eJl

rt Eii€r.lgiH

HI

'frig Fl

€if el

Hi$ rlB;B .S,t

#i* $tsi.".tl

€iF HI

,$._g

a&txi-$#*3*a$EFg$fi$E$

{",Rs'\'En-fi4

4E

rclvQqlf^{

)r-r1l't*>at

E3$'+,gL

t;t,dl

trit,L}

fL*;.r^.

t"{,r

.4rtr'

aifir*t.ci

q;!

r,.vssi':8 ;ls!:t)t 94

i

.rgptat\t

l)xtoteaI

E,*gehtlxf4.oJ itilE$s9.t.85f;to9rd€Rdr4o.&.|3 'r6 !3-a4qff3hx's

1 Y

9{Ub>

fip;a"iiS&#asr*(1 F

xa€q,*U

:v{);f;s'.,? ft"!YFlffiJa!dfrvt:. .g?.53S\rt L&*'it 6,tQi;0TBs*EooP. c*

i;::li::::::::::1;:;:;r::?::;:::li;:::::lil::*::;::::r:t;r::t:tr::.*i:, :::

i, i:

i:nii :1,

.i'.> g;.t: *;

ud'3

'n

Iz.E

)

c:€ -:1

dt<:t::ba'''c13aq

t

iI

t :i1

-q rrr

:l

:.!i

rj:

r>lqFrtl .-.

+En

f!F1

r*'

{\ft

tclPil

lialgi

EI&l

atl?rlffi iist'.i rl;i

Cr ".:.'

fqi

{;l

-id:.

ts€t-

43

. /, 'l:

:?1:t:!:: :

,!rir I. ti.:

'' ir i

L.r l:: :

v::: :

D::: :

Fo:,, '

Ol:' ,

el. :mi::: :

<l i:. :

r, i:: .ioit :

$i; :

$!': '

rdi. :L':::: :

s}-i:.gf,l

bei'ig!:.gr:

e i;

g ::.;

.aa

-:l>t

E ::i

3 ::i

< ::l::1

"''.:'i:

a:lj

:::;:::

l:,,'l:::::

rl:i::

,,,,,t

:::::l

:r$:i4it

:e.;W,

::::::::

:::::,::

::::::

:::.:.:

:::::::

,:,ii:

:36:

':t

v

:"€$g

cy,fitn \rr

R'sy,JV(})X{lv

c) sft9:re L!-*r k

€ F€r.-La"a

l- r{ '(UHolrlH n'gi(E -* ii,9-x 6CI*ts-fl/ -{. r-k --1

EbrP6 qF r--J;Icu!1 0-t H.s

Document Releaserd Under the Access toiii:..ir. iil Pi,.rols 3osr,l D(urrn,;sSisrr dc;s lrbi|atror'rsi:ir::

'r:r: iil. <ri C:r:iada cgr,rjitiDr:a€;@5 d:; 0a33da

I

'jn

i

Fstt.t ChiiirperSonDs Parole Boarci of Cairadg

l_

Minister's ResDor)sa

I apprci,e; ;

I dc not approv€: ,--

Vic Toews. P.C.. O.C., i/.P

The Honoulabie Vic Toe,ss, P.C., Q,C., ful,P.

Minisler of Fublic $afeiy, Qsplsdui

i

I

i

.---J

t*I

SuujerlODitgt

Hsase$tf of MinlgteteApggy.at;.Fvp.c!.p- j?g*ij#p.g€:!lfg;g8,!CIPq

Under the auspices of the Treasury BoarC Directive on the tvlanagement af ExpenditrJres on Travel,Ccnference,arrd 'r'lespitalityi w€ &r€ required !r eeek ycur approval fcr'eventso orhei than corernsncii:le and trairiihg in whioh lotal costs exi;eei1 $25,t10C.

$Je hale estimeieci that iotal cosls for the next iounr:l ai Bcarct menrber inte.rview* wili exceed ihisihreshold, and are therelbrc EeeRlng yorlr approvsi in oi.der thal we sen make the r'eqUiredarrangemenis, I he atlactred fonnv pn)vid} deli:iis of Dur ccvl estitnate.

Given the requirement io acquii'e approval pr'ior to tinelizing tiavel arnangemeqts, suah as bcokirrgflights and confirpning hplels, gs weil as rhe escaiating costs:ac we epproaeh the havel daies, r,ve

rntculd be much appfeciaiive of ie6eiving your #ecision ai your eariiest convetience,

pleggg feei freo tofonte.&l me if -vcu ha'ie an)1 qr.,e*tilns.,.- ,t .J .^ l, I

' -'"\i:j "*' F,",,,,..'l-\rrt"'

" -. - " (: _,!,'*....--..'*..

Har"eY Cenaiko

Encl. ['l]

I nfor mnUom$CIt,{qep ffi^ffitqlat d i vu I g u e en ve rt ude la Loi sur l'accris A l'information.

fra|e'.

ae

00004

Fvent:

furrWs.e;

fialtt:LMa?.iott:

9r:fnrmmti*n A*t / ili*eurnsnt divt"rlgu* sR vsntuFaro.{e #ssrd *f {*n*dn de [m L*i sur l'm*eqis & l'inf*rrxatinn.T r# v e l, € o*fe r * n rc s s n d *4 o s p ft * I f tt1 E v e wt,4B p rav a f

llaar<J t*estbei lntcrvievn; - Session 2 {frtt{tber z7l2-lvl*rck 2fr13 upxlicunt:

-

lnten,iietils ol potentifrl Eoard fultmbers

****rn*nt *:?*{*ffi$*d Lir"rdan ths &e**$s ts

rr l\ttitE:.

$*ppl s,- *g! ! /:,e.d -tg ft1:

MinrsSerj lj uld,l *ttimateds\periEs > 595;Orti"dnd/ar enyh Ds pir.e t ; r.tr ? lem E ntsfil 1.2 aaqly.

elelf$-erjr4i ( stal Ktiffiatedaupenses >.$5,000 but< oy;izs,gpDatd/rtrhos?itaitty > Sf,Sagbut:< ot = 55,ar0, aadno*e at l:|trt! D s p i tti li ry e ]em e h ts'

in i.j ap.ptr,

Ss,l!-<!t ry totai EstidatedLt-oJ|-q=t.igr'i, ex/tnsts < c: .6oq Re€rE4El gs,${Jo, and/Lrv,!4.&2;5

ceacral]t hnsPitgi;eYls< gt=

$tr,SflB.cnd no

nospitdiili elr||,entsln 1,2 apply.

i ,ii',,i i 'j',

Voriaex dttes sereas ttts Eauntlv

Prepared 5.*:

Appj uYe{.by,

33te

00005

Document Reledserd UnderInformation Act / Dr:cument

the Access todivulgue en vertu

Ewnt

Purp6e:

Date:

Lfro&$

Parole Eoord of Canada de la Loi sur l'acces a l'information.Travel Conterences ond Hospitdlity Event Appraval - Detsilled Cost Cslculstions

Basrd Member lnterviews - Session 2 (Oaober 2072-Morch 20lj applicontsltryntewsof poteffi"t e.trd ^

.y3 io*a"tes _Varlous cities across the country

Estirnated Staod.rd Otl tor M{als /A[owaffer 589.85 bated on Travel Diectivc for 42 days

[smored Standard c$rfq trlcrli/Atlomqet 915.15 bascd on Trave lO]rectlve fof 1? days (rhfse padclpanu do not lec€hre tlre ful] dty of rDeayalioKnceiilEdmrted Strndqd Cost {ry Acaonrnodarltn 5159.00 bated on Accommodallon Dlrectpry rdtei ln lafg€ cantr6.llstjmled Strndard Csl f6 OtlEr (taxles, parkn& €tc-) le ba*d s SSO.00 pcrdry for 59 day3

. deflnldgn: B6ln€st msctln8r lwtrliogs6sb6, wl plaonlng re€tlogs,advisdv?nd maBgrmol.ommltte.csft{etences rrqerl s awothartqmal g,thcrlngot federal goyamment or nsF edenlSdemmeai peffito p.rtiripat{ h adMti6 wh s interoiis lor rec.uibftnt in tho poblic seflke, pt$tiSlos ceroffi's, awfd3

eremqio. Exclldct trainiry, hsrlngs and vi<Jrc.on{erencel.

00006

oooo

,3"€#g

rn {u

H'sVffiX<lv\0) #6rz 'd-}* '?Ft >-vL_L-4J h() c#eCIcr r'*L{Pd^

@r ;-{ '$

XOU)H n'9i(E-- XQaiffic);7:-n/ x" t--Tx6wE6 E?- r-

-J;b$(J r.)*aE a:f-l L- -rrlJ

g

3

6b

c

;36

I

E

5

F

E

.s

t2nn=3

9.

z9

e4.F9566gP

}P>9

6i

OJ

qa

:€

o

,:

g

€

6EE

I

b+F!

it6tg,E

c6

De:5pa

63d6zz

E;i

9996B;ETE=oa€bbb6€6b3b99!E-g,E999888

*;x6EA8!3

2.E

'te'6E

oE

!

=3

I

=E+!

9;rag9

oE}E

ezgrOJ

2'

EE-5

3:bb!5.s ,g

9983

.>5

ss33Pgz2

I

I

>l*l8

;l e,

Et =nl x

€o*"'l ist d!o''EeF.9:{

g

;ts,fii

q

Iq

'E

Bgtf,

.Oovlb.EFeEq^Edf, -o

*>l

t6{l

€ooo€

ftq)g

n6E.E :€ €,b

-t <-J(l)

r,-Fi=iC tr--*, hI6E(-,-LF^

-LEr f "oHE.'l,HO,Fi(E-- X()?i 6Q).y-fY \. r-

rfE0.CIgE oF rJ

=t$(J

-eF alflL-:Ft v