12 19 11 0204 03628 1708 Ocr Reply in Support of Mtn for Order Show Cause No Numbers

7/28/2019 12 19 11 0204 03628 1708 Ocr Reply in Support of Mtn for Order Show Cause No Numbers

1/25

RICHARD G HI ESQ.State Bar No. 96CASE D. BAKR, ESQ.State Bar No. 904RICARD G I CHARERED62 Forest StreetReo Neada 8909() 3480888

Attorey or Paiti

IN HE USICE COUR OF RENO OWNSHIP

COUN OF WASHOE SAE OF NEADA

MA MERISS;

Paiti

.

ZACHAR BARKR COUGHIN;

Deedat.

))))))))

Case No. V000708

Det. No. 2

PLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDR TO SHOW CAUS

Plaiti MA MERSS through ouse CHD G HI CERED

ad CASE D. BAKR ESQ. reies i o o his motio or order to show ause led

herei. Coughli has ailed to oose the motion i ay real wa ad does not disute thathe is i ontemt o out his rey is based o the oits ad authorities beow ad all

aers ad eadigs o le herei

POINTS D AUTHORITIS

Cougl was ete a loe out o e sube roey on oembe

20. O Noember 320 he was disoered liig i the basement ad was arrestedor tresassig Reeree is made to the delaratio o Rihard G. Hil Esq. attahed to

the istat motio at Exhibit or rther atual artiulars Coughlin has ot deied

tese ts. Coughli is i otemt o out uder both NRS 22.020 ad NRS 22.00(3)


2/25

A Cohi m Rd "Commi L

Uimly Hv B Wivd by Him d Im M of Boh w

d F d h Shod b Jdiy oppd Fom Rii Thm.

It aars that Cughlin ma hav sd this mtin in his mtin t

vaat" ld hrin n Dmr , 20 In that ar h taks th nw sitin th

lkutwas imrmissil aus h had a mmrial las". r th urts rfrn

a tru and rrt f th ll xutd las whih was ntrd int vdn at th

vitin haring as Exhiit A, is attahd hrt as EXBI 1

irst it is lar that Cughlin has nt rad RS 404 th statut un whih

his vitin was asd Instad h is skng t al as law th gnral statmnt in th

landlrd/tnant handk that summary vitins ar nt availal fr th tin f

mmrial tnants fr thr than th nnaymnt f rnt hat is an vrgnralizatin

f th law and in an vn ds nt al hr.

RS 4024 siall rvids that summary vitins ar availal wh

h of dwi i [ ] is bj o h povio of hp A of

N ." mhasis addd Cughlin tris t fus n alling th lasmmrial"instad

f rsidntial ut that tati is misguidd hat argumnt is maninglss in light f th

plain language ofthe controlling statute. The proper focusis on whether or not the lease

was sujt t NRS Chatr 8A S lng as it was summar vitin was allwd. Ntuntil aer the evction wascomplete,did Coughlin make this argument Further, Coughlin

hasnotmade any showing that Chapter 118Adidnotapply. In fact, throughout theeviction

proceedings, hespecicallyargued that it did apply, and the court ruled on that basis

Coughlin's two ositions are totay nconsisten, and e is judcay estopped from

changinghis defense now SeearcusevDelWebbCommnities, 123 Nev278,163 P.3d

462 (200), whih rvds as fllws:

Judiial stl alis whn th fllwng v ritria ar mt


3/25

uisditiwl app a'trough

he bem ih these agumets is that Shuk did t makethem whe he sd sma judgmet i the distit uWhie this ut gies a de eiew t a distit uts deisit gat summa judgmet,a de stadad eiew des ttum the geea ule that [a] it t uged i the tia ut,

uless it ges t the that ut, is deemed t haebee waied ad t be sideed .. dso s no obled o wde nd se eene eod o some spe s w m suppoe nonmon ptys clm

Schuck at 5-55 (iteal itatis mitted).

Even if Cughlin's uentfabiatedagumentthat the leasewas mmeia"

ud smehw bensideedjuisditina, Cughin amative waived that agument

by choosing his defensesbased onNRS Chapter 118A. Henever raised theissue, and the

ut was nt bligated t nd it andaise it him. Schuck. Futhe eveni Cughlin

wee uig e me uliesed bsiesses ut that e,he still has t shw

hw tha emes the matte NRS Chte 118A n Couln onnues ole moons bsed on posons o N Cpe A nludn e moon

ve se o te Deembe en nd n w e ues

te lese ws "ommel

A a atua mae a assei that the lease was ahig but a esidetia

ease is siml t tue. aagah 2 the ease des that the emises was eted t

Cughli ad his gilied esidetia uses ". he aagah that Cughiis elig is aagah 11 the lease. I the exeuted ease that aagah ides i

at that the e shal be used a esidee ad the uses" See EXHIBI

1 I the eet the ut is ilied t hea agumet the matte,Meliss l eset

edee at the Deembe 22 2011 heaig that aagah 11 i the on ease

dumet ded t Cughi,ha aagah stated shal be used a esidee ad the use". Meliss l the eset edee that Cughli

suepously ateed that laguage bee he siged ad etued the lease. he ut

will eal that D. Meliss testied at the Otbe 25, 2011 heaig abut the isis


4/25

nthe nterestof mtatn thealready staern amont of feesand coststhat Cohn

has cased Merlssto ncr on what shold have eena smpleevcton,Merlss has not

spoeaedthe Cty of Reo, t reseres hs rht to do so the eet the cort elects to

eterta any armet or edence pt forth y Coh n sppor of ths fallacy 1

CONCLUSON

Cohl s contempt of ths cor He does ot deny t Istead, he ats

to rase tmely, tre, frm, ad spported armets aot some o-estet,

lcesed sesses he may hae ee leally operat ot of the property Cohl

has no oere any real opposo o he moon, an he o shol sse he orer to

show case forthwth Referece s made to the declarato of Casey D. Baker, sq,

attached hereto as XHIBIT ,for athetcato of a ehts A form of the proposed

order s attached hereto as XHIBIT .

WRFOR,Merlss prays for a order of ths cort reqr defeat,

ACHARY BARKR COGHLI, to appear an show ase why he shold ot e he

cotempt of cort der RS 22010( for hs resstace to ths corts awlly etered

orer,a der RS 22020 for hs lleal reetry onto the sject property aer econ;

for an orer tha Cohln payMerss for he osts nrred to sere the propety aer the

reak- y Cohl as a odto of hs e pred of hs contempt of cort; a for

sh other,rther ad adtoal relef as seems jst to the Cort the premses

The cort s asked to recall that at the Octoer 2, 2011 ecto hear, arepresetate from ery had oly jst e test whe Mr Cohlwthdrew hs armet aot some retalatory terrpto of hs electrcal serce,render that testmony nnecessay The wtess was the dsmssed aer hawasted a etre mor o ths matter The N ery attorey, who ha ow pfrom Laseas for the hear, had wasted a trp It s ths type of perpeta osesey Cohl, a attorey, that has force Merlss o r tes of thosads of olars ees a oss ths maer


5/25

ESQCASEY D. BA R ESQDATD ths ' day of Decemer, 2011

RICHARD G HILL, CHARTRD

652 Forest Street

Reo Neada 89509Attoreys for at


6/25


7/25

1

EXHIBT


8/25

F 2 M OL

_=S 5OS _:-


9/25

aos)"!I lr; 0ceIh

42 F 934 1818 G 003

13 ULE: RkQthflww s P_Uct"HJ.Er!O' - JiI' b5=e,_Dl8m &od!rT nf

RewlbpktM 4 : IL. oroh k, C ; mibtabu

5 & 15 WA'BE, R"Iio!atdpmO.mlbJI

v iewI'aMn6 ATtT: KW1la!su)pl_r wMp l

" f B O J p o g o D

' _ R V E A rb Q w

I M t ; 9 W T 0 T U =

- J

/ "j != P s m _ 2 ) y N S I,R b d

:. OWER p"c! w) nfeIpi (& P T e

& ' g I , l S

! a p 9 e : = w h ! q

u U 2rAC0 PEMi Ifthepdnabtlor'CI! 1/i

ro!cpi baw e t ea

01li OG. Wlovmi 10 W Irn ( .ar Cca S_h n' 8e

o o v w ,e r mb_orT t etuwbPa ji1of )!obe,uIT JfTOwiljsipl7wl aiout Ih pniIN.mfT8Ca. e FOJ1 LglWi f[\ M"UIUel

24 PLU i abeb-dl /pfc"JQnot IW10. r.10r.ofr,J.plgm4 Ft ae&" IdHc rmCadMI, Rcl ; AuJtunpk;5. (RstlP.O:Rtk(" egi1Ml nsm_&DC!1g(w hlf

lur Inco" 'laUrM_te1,etUwTh.

hD !,2 MI;tofwbL'o IuCpybl!r _ado!t.l_d10Fbyi T01, ujI'J Rc.t nML NQ

IL-U


10/25


11/25

IBI

HIBIT 2


12/25

.,

smess Icense (uey age or

ai Meu Cy of Reno Bsness Lcese Serch

(Ps do book s g S d is o svd. Clk Go to M Mu nd book sh g)

For oc cords nd cton n upo bsnss css, s cotct th Cty of Ro Bss cnsg Dvso 39.

age ofneName nsAcvy cTpe Nm S wS MxEDe Cy

GHLINS'ORY Mcd

nn 919 ctv Upd / 36 M SlesSILOWS

MIC469

SPSS

ener Bsss 8 Icv d / 13 RS CIYN

Se Z

NV 893

NV 896

shboad.enovlRenBusiessLicensesldPaeasx?dReQestFwad2=F. //


13/25

EXIBIT

EXHBT 3


14/25

BAER ESQ.

RICHARD G HILLSQState Bar o 596CASY D BAKR SQ

State Bar o 950RICHARD G HILL CHARTRD652 Forest StreetReno eada 89509(775 80888

Attorney or lant

I TH JSTIC CORT OF RO TOWSHI

COTY OF WASHOSTAT OF VADA

MRLISS Case o RV20-00708

lant Dept o 2

ZACHARY BARKR COGHLI

Deendant

DECTON OF CEY D.

CASY D BAKRSQen rst dly sworndeposes and nder penay o

perry aers

I am a resdent o the Cty o RenoCony o WashoeState o eadaand oer 8 years o ae Ths decaraton s ased on my personal knowledeecept those

maters stated on normaton and ee and as to those tems I eee them to e tre

Ths decaraton s made n spport o plants Reply in Support of Motion for Order to

Show Cause an represens my tesmony ae on o resen same n o

2 I am an attorney dly lcensed as sh y the State o eada to practce

eore all corts o ths State and mantan my oce at 652 Forest Street Reno eada

I am also lcensed to practce eore the nted States Dstrct Cor or the Dstrct o

eada


15/25


16/25

BAER ESQ.

RICHARD G HILL SQState Bar No 596CASY D BAKR, SQState Bar No 9504RICHARD G HILL CHARTRD652 Forest StreetReo, Neada 89509(775 480888

Attorey for lat

I TH JSTIC CORT OF RNO TOWSHI

CONTY OF WASHO STAT OF NVADA

MRLISS;

lat

ZACHARY BARKR COGHLIN;

Defedat

Case No RV20100708

Dept No 2

DECTION OF CE D.

CASY D. BAKR SQ. e rst dly swor deposes ad der peay of

perry aers

1 I am a resdet of the Cty of Reo Coty of Washoe State of Neada,ad oer 18 years of ae Ths declarato s ased o my persoal kowlede ecept those

matters stated o formato ad elef, ad as to those tems I elee them to e tre

Ths declarato s made spport of pats Reply i Support of Moio for Order to

Show Cause a represes my testmoy cae o o ese sme o

2 I am a attorey dy lcesed as sch y the State of Neada to practce

efore all corts of ths State ad mata my oce at 652 Forest Street Reo, Neada

I am aso lcesed to practce efore the ted States Dstrct Cor for the Dstrct of

Neada


17/25

IIIII rsoIeAED B

3 My ofce represents the painti Dr.MatthewMerliss inthis mattr

4 I hae persoaly reiewed the exhiits to the refereced repy, ad ach

exhiit is a tre ad correct copy of what it prports to e

5 I decare der pealty of pery that the foreoi is tre ad correct.

FITION Pusuan o N B.

The ndersined does herey afrmthatthe precedin docment doenot

cotai the socia secrity mer of yt . ,DATD this J day of Decemer, 201


18/25

EXI 4

EXHI 4


19/25

)

__

RCHRD G HSQSae Bar No. 596CASY D BAKR SQState Bar No 950RICHARD G HICHARTRED652 Fores SreeReo eada 89509(775 8-0888

Attorey or Plat

N TH JSTC CORT OF RNO TOWNSH

CONTY OF WASHOSTAT OF EVADA

MA MERISS; ase No REV20100708Pa

Dep No 2

ZACHRY BARKER COGHN;

Deeda

ORER TO SHOW CAUSE

PaMA MERISSha moed hs co or a order compel

defendan,ZACHARYBARKER COUGHLIN,o appear and showcause whyhe should not

be held in conempof court pursuan o NRS 22.020 and NRS 22.010(3); the matter

havn eenulyrefedy thepaes; hecoren llyapprsedn hepremses,and

ood case appear

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED tat Zacary Barer Co a appear

Depatmet2otheaove-ettled cortat thehor o o' clock .m ohe_

dayof . 201_,andhenandhere toshowcae,ifany,whyhe should no

ehelcoempocor prsat oNRS22.020or hs lawl reety oo he real


20/25

Caus ,

{& .\

RICHARD G. HILL, ESQ.State Bar No. 596CASEY D. BAR, ESQState Bar No. 9504RCHARD G HILL, CHARTERED

652 Forest StreetReno,evada 89509(775) 348-0888

Attorney for Plainti

N THE JUSTCE COURT OF RENO TOWNSHIP

CONTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEADA

AMERLSS;

Panti

)))))))))

Case No.: REV20-001708

Dept No. 2v.

ZACHARY BARKER COUGHLN

Defendant

REQUESTFOR SUBMISSION OFMOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The plainti, A MERLISS, by and through his atorney o record,

RICHARD G HILL, CHARTERED and CASEYD BAKER, ESQ,requests that the Motion

for Order to Show led November 21,20, be submited to the Court or a decision.

AFFATON Pursuant to NR B.

The undersigned does hereby arm that the preceding document does not

contain the socal securty number of any person.

DATED this da2011

RICHARD G HILL C

CASEY B R, ESQ.RCHARD HLL, ESQ652 Forest Street

RTERD

Reno,Nevada 89509Atorneys or lainti


21/25

\qay

CERTFCATE OF SERVCE

Puruant to NRCP ), herey ert that I am a employee o RICAR G

ILL,CARTERED,an that o the o Deemer,0,I epote n the Ute

State mal at Reo, Nevaa,n a eae envelope, potage prepa,a true a orret opy

o the oregong Request for Submission of Motion for Order o Show Causto:

Zah Coughln, Eq./o Slver Dollar Motor Loge87 North rgna Street, Ste. Reo, Nevaa 80


22/25

--

RIARD G. ILL ESQ.State Ba No 596ASEY D. BAKR ESQState Ba No. 950

RIARD G ILL ARTERED652 Foest SteetReno Nevada 89509(775) 38-0888

Attoney fo ant

IN TE JUSTIE OURT OF RENO TOWNSI

OUNT OF WASOE STATE OF NEADA

MA MERLISS )) ase No: RE2011-001708

ant )) Dept No. 2

v ))

ZARY BARKR OUGLIN ))

Defendant )

OPPOSTON TO COGHLN'S SECOND MOTON TO CONTEST PERSOALROPERT LEN AND FOR TRN OF PEONAL PROPERT

ant/Landod MA MERLISS though ounse RIARD G HILL

ATERED and ASEY D BAKR ESQ opposes the moton to ontest pesonapopety en ed heen by defendant ZAARY OUGLIN on Deembe 52011. The

moton suntmey and an mpemssbe seond attempt to have the out hea a moton

he onceabandoned,andwhich has become stale. This opposition isbased onthepoints and

authotes beow and a papes and peadngs on e heen

PONTS AND ATHORTES

FAS

M oughn was eted fom the popety on Novembe 1 2011 e ed hs

frst motionto contest personal properylienon November 16,2011. Merliss opposedthat


23/25

paymntofan ,orrop rty

witin

mtn n Nvember 21 2011. That opposition is incorporated herein by his

reference. At tat tme te curt was attemted t set a earng n r Cugln's

mtn fr Nvember 22 2011 but r. Cugln resed t cerate r cmmuncate t

te curt get tat hearng n calendar deste reeated requests b erlss cunsethat

e d s. See Exbt 3 and Exbt 4 t erlss Nvember 21 2011 stn.

Due slel t r. Cugln's game-la the earng tat the curt was

attemtng t scedule fr Nvember 22 2011 was never laced n te curts caledar

and never aened Of curse r Cugln nw redctabl clams that e swe u

t curt n Nvember 22 reared t g frward. Weter r nt e swed u t curt

r Cugln knew tat te earng ad nt been laced n te calendar and w. B w

r. Cugln's cmlete and utter lack f veract n the cnduct f these rceengs

sul nt even need mentnng.

r. Cugln ten led a second mtn t cntest ersnal rert le n

Deceme 5 2011. Tereaer te curt set a hearng n tat mtn fr TuesaDecember 20 2011. Ts aer s led n stn t that mtn

W D YSS

Cugln's mtn s brught ursuant t NRS 8A.460 Subsectn 2 f tat

staute rvdes:

2. A dsute relatng t te amunt f te csts clamedb te landlrd ursuant t aragra a f sbsectn 1 ma bereslved usng te rcedure rvded n subsectn 7 f NRS40.253

NRS 18A.4602

III

NRS 40.25378 rvdes as fllws:

. 7 Thetnantmay, upon of theappropriate feesrelatgtotheflgandservice a motion, leamotionwitte

court,onaformprodedbyteclerkoftecourt, todisputeteamountoftecosts, If claimedbytelandlordpursuanttoNRS 118.207or118A.460 theinventory,moving andstorage ofpersonal le onte premises. Themotion mustbeled 20daysaerthe summaryorderforremovalofthe tenantorthe abandonmentofthepremisesbythetenant, or wihin days aer:


24/25

h aring ri

pro tyf

(a) The tenanthasvacatedorbeenremovedfom

the remises; and()Acopy of thosechargeshasbeenrequestedby

or rovided to the tenant,

Ewhichever is later

8. Upon the ling of a motion puruant to ubection 7 the courhal chedule a hearng on h motion The hearing mustbeheld within days aer the ling of the otion The courthal ax the date of the tothe motion and order a copeved upon the landlord b the contable or other proceerver At the hearing the court ma:

(a) Determine the cot if an caimed b the andlordpuruant to NS 827 or 8A46 and an accumulating dailcot; and

(b) Ordertherelease of the tenant's uponthepament of the charge determined tobedueor nocharge aredetermined to be due.

NS 4.2537)8) (emphai added)

ere Coughlin led hi rt motion puruant to NS 8A46 on Noveber

62. That motion wa timel. owever when the court attempted to et the hearing

Coughln reed to cooperate or communicate wth the cout to get the hearin on

calendar depite repeated requet from Merli' coune that he do o. A a ole and direct

reult of Mr. Coughlin' real to coperte with the court to et hi own hearing that

hearin never happened. The da in which to hold the hearing under NS 4.238)

have now expired. Mr. Coughlin' motion i tale and the relief he eek i now tie

barred. Becaue he abandoned that motion it wa eectivel denied e ha not hownan good reaon wh he hould be given leave to re-le that motion See eg Masonry &

Tile Conraors Ass'n o Nev v Jolley Urga & Wirh Ld., 3 Nev. 737744 2d

486 7) (A ditrict court ma reconider a prevoul decided iue if ubtantiall

dierent evidence i ubequentl introduced or the deciion i cearl erroneou.") rd,

NevertheleMr. Coughlin led hi econd motion puruant to NS 8A46

on December 5 2. Even though the court ha alread et a hearing on the motion the

motion hould be denied. Mr Cughlin wa evicted from he propert on November


25/25

19ayof c mb r,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC

Pursuant to NRCP 5),I hereby cert that I a an empoyee of RICA G

0,I deposted n the tedILL,CARTERED and that on the

States ma at Reno, Nevada,n a seaed enveope,postage prepad,a true and correc copy

of the foregong OPPOSITION TO COUGINS SECO MOTION TO CONEST

PERSONAL PROPERT LIEN AN FOR RETURN OF PERSONA PROPERT to

Zach Coughn, Esqc/o Sver Doar Motor Lodge87 North rgina Stree, Ste 2Reno, Nevada 8950

Documents

12 19 11 0204 03628 1708 Ocr Reply in Support of Mtn for Order Show Cause No Numbers