Upload
augusta-summers
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Using ACCESS for ELLS ® Data to Inform Instruction
Presenter: Margot DownsWIDA Certified Consultant
ACCESS for ELLs®, W-APT™, and ELP Standards Trainer
May 2, 2011Maine Department of Education ESL/Bilingual
Programs Professional development online webinar
2
Resources
• Interpretive Guide for Score Reports 2011 http://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS/index.aspx
• WIDA Focus Bulletinshttp://www.wida.us/resources/index.asp(Formative Assessment Bulletin)
3
Minh
a454 / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
• US Born
• Linguistic background: Vietnamese
• 6th grade
Year Grd L L S S R R W W C C
2011 6 4.9 378 6.0 405 3.8 356 4.4 373 4.7 373
4
ACCESS for ELLs®• As with all assessments, a test score should be
considered one of multiple criteria in making educational decisions.
• ACCESS for ELLs® data is a starting point for teacher planning, collaboration, and differentiation.
• Opportunities to look for patterns in language development from the individual to the district level
• ACCESS for ELLs® should be part of a balanced assessment system which incorporates formative, interim, and summative assessments based on standards and learning targets.
5
Types of Scores
• Raw Scores• Scale Scores• Proficiency Level Scores
6
Raw Scores• The actual number of items/tasks correct out of total number
of items/tasks• Use these scores with caution! Very rough indicator of
student performance and not appropriate to make generalizations or track student growth
Example from Teacher Report (Writing)
7
Scale Scores
• The scale scores allow raw scores across grades and tiers to be compared on a single vertical scale K-12 within a single domain
Year Grd L L S S R R W W C C
2011 6 4.9 378 6.0 405 3.8 356 4.4 373 4.7 373
8
Proficiency Level Scores• These scores are an interpretation of scale
scores• Whole number = proficiency level based on WIDA ELP
Standards• Decimal =proportion within proficiency level, not an
interval
Year Grd L L S S R R W W C C
2011 6 4.9 378 6.0 405 3.8 356 4.4 373 4.7 373
Composite Score: 15% Listening, 15% Speaking, 35% Reading, 35% Writing
9
Proficiency Level Scores
Grade Scale Score Proficiency Level
5th 303 2.04th 303 2.43rd 303 3.0
Interpretation of scale scores to proficiency level is grade specific.
10
Confidence Bands (Teacher Report)
Graphic representation of Standard Error of Measurement. This reminds test users that a single test score represents a range of possible outcomes and should never be interpreted as the only possible outcome (95% probability that the average score if a student took the test multiple times would fall within the Confidence Band).
11
Starting Point for Collaborative Conversations
www.sedl.org
When making determinations on instruction and language programming, examining individual
student performance in each domain provides a more comprehensive profile.
12
Writing Rubric
What does her writing look like in the content areas?Is she being provided with explicit language instruction
to support writing in the various content areas?
13
Can Do Descriptors (6-8 writing)
Level 4 Expanding Level 5 Bridging
• Create multiple-paragraph essays• Justify ideas • Produce content-related reports • Use details/examples to support ideas • Use transition words to create cohesive passages • Compose intro/body/conclusion• Paraphrase or summarize text • Take notes (e.g., for research)
• Create expository text to explain graphs/charts• Produce research reports using multiple sources/ citations• Begin using analogies • Critique literary essays or articles
14
WIDA ELP StandardsStandard 4: Science
Domain: Writing(model performance indicators)
Level 4 Expanding Level 5 Bridging
Explain uses of different forms of energy depicted visually (eg. ___ is used to ___.)
Evaluate and defend uses of different forms of energy (e.g.; “I think solar energy is most efficient because…”
Integration with other language skills (transformations)
15
MinhYear Grd L L S S R R W W C C
2011 6 4.9 378 6.0 405 3.8 356 4.4 373 4.7 373
2010 5 5.3 375 6.0 403 3.3 334 4.9 376 4.8 365
2009 4 5.6 371 4.8 365 3.4 324 4.2 346 4.3 345
• NECAP, NWEA, Running Records, Grades• Long Term ELL • Need to integrate explicit academic language instruction in daily core instruction
16
Samira (Somali) Foreign Born
Year Grd L L S S R R W W C C
2011 4 6 412 3.9 347 6.0 404 4.5 356 6.0 382
2010 3 5.8 362 6.0 403 6.0 355 4.7 351 5.7 362
2009 2 5.0 324 2.3 297 5.0 312 2.7 273 3.3 298
2008 1 4.0 295 6.0 420 2.5 260 2.7 260 3.5 289
Communicating with Parents• Parent Report• Concrete examples of student work
17
Thank you!