37
1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM Compliance Executive Bank of America - St. Louis, Missouri [email protected]

1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

1

Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews

FIRMA National Training ConferenceApril 15-19, 2007

David Cormak, Senior Vice PresidentGWIM Compliance Executive

Bank of America - St. Louis, Missouri [email protected]

Page 2: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

2

Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation reflects the opinions of the author and not necessarily those of Bank of America

Page 3: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

3

Agenda

What is an Administrative Review and why do it? Regulatory expectations The Risk/Reward Balance

Determining the Scope of an Administrative Review Risk Ranking accounts Frequency of review Elements to review Other Process Considerations

Technology Compliance/Risk Role

Page 4: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

4

What is an Administrative Review?

Administrative Review covers the synoptic coding and general administrative data of an account to ensure compliance with:

Terms of the governing instrument Internal policies and procedures Regulations All applicable laws

Page 5: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

5

What is an Administrative Review?

It is not an annual investment review as required by Reg 9.

It can be as simple as reviewing synoptic coding to ensure it is in line with the governing instrument.

It can be as extensive as a full document review, updating a family tree, reviewing transactions, or ensuring all appropriate parties are receiving statements.

Page 6: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

6

Regulatory Expectations

While there is no regulatory requirement to perform an Administrative Review, if you do perform them, the expectation is that you will:

Use a consistent process to review accounts. Review your accounts on a regular basis. Address any issues you identify as part of the

process.

Page 7: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

7

Why do an Administrative Review?

It can be an effective management tool to manage risk and ensure compliance with the governing instruments.

However, it is not one size fits all.

Page 8: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

8

The Risk/Reward Balance The Risk/Reward analysis will vary by each

organization’s unique circumstances: Have there been mergers or major systems conversions? Have there been recent negative exam or audit findings? Is the account base comprised of a disproportionate

number of high risk accounts? How easy is it to gather the account information needed

to do a review? Do you need to invest in technology to track and report

against the results? What is the quality of your staff? What is the status of your quality controls? What is the capacity of your staff to absorb the additional

work?

Page 9: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

9

Risk/Reward Balance Potential Benefits

Increased confidence: That accounts are being administered in

accordance with the key provisions of the governing document.

In the accuracy of key system coding. In the accuracy of management reporting, fee

calculations and distributions. That appropriate actions will be taken at the

time of a significant life event.

Page 10: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

10

Risk/Reward BalancePotential Benefits

Mitigate risk by identifying potential issues or opportunities.

Strengthen customer relationships by improving communication and service quality by having a better understanding of the terms and conditions of the agreement and accurate systems coding.

Page 11: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

11

Risk Ranking of Accounts

Risk ranking accounts can help optimize your administrative reviews by:

Properly aligning resources with risk. Focus management's attention on higher risk

accounts. Varying the frequency of reviews based on

risk.

Page 12: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

12

Risk Ranking of Accounts Common risk ranking categories:

Account Type (Trust vs. Agency) Revocability Pledged Assets Investment Responsibility UPIA Market Value Multiple beneficiaries Specialty (Unique) assets Concentrations Holding Bank Stock

Page 13: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

13

Example of Review Schedule based upon Risk

High risk – most frequent (every 6-12 months)

Medium risk – based on preset cycle (every 12 -24 months)

Low risk – longest cycle (every 24 to 36 months)

On an as needed basis, when a significant event occurs

Page 14: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

14

Determining Scope to include on an Administrative Review

Review important administrative items such as: Documents (original and amendments) System coding (especially those that drive

activity) Verification of governing law Tax documentation (W-9, W-8) Statements to beneficiaries and third parties

Page 15: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

15

Determining Scope to include on an Administrative Review

Unique account circumstances Discretionary and other distribution

provisions KYC documentation Documentation regarding key agreements

(fees, repetitive distributions, delegations, etc.)

Page 16: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

16

Determining Scope to include on an Administrative Review

Overlay actual experience and consider adding elements that: Regularly cost the firm money in losses. Have been cited during recent audits or

compliance reviews. Are critical path items, even if they do not

present current problems. Regularly review the scope of the

Administrative Review in light of recent experience.

Page 17: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

17

Determining Scope to include on an Administrative Review

Emerging areas for consideration:

Compliance with Privacy policy Compliance with information protection

process (systems access or data mining) Obligations imposed by new laws such as UPIA

or the UTC

Page 18: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

18

Other Process Considerations Who will perform the reviews? How will the results be documented? Who has ultimate accountability for

oversight of the process and resolution of exceptions?

Who ensures that unresolved exceptions are appropriately addressed?

Who is accountable for looking at the “big picture” to identify, monitor and address systemic issues?

Page 19: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

19

Technology

Depending on the size of your organization, the state of your accounts and available resources, Excel might be sufficient technology.

Or you may find that the gains from time, cost and quality justify an expenditure on larger systems applications.

Page 20: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

20

Key Technology Uses

Use technology to standardize your process.

Risk rank accounts based on systems coding.

Scan account information and automatically generate exceptions to be address based on predefined norms.

Page 21: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

21

Key Technology Uses

Automatically generate review when an updated review is required while archiving the older reviews.

Use technology to create management reporting to track progress on reviews and track the correction of any exceptions found during review.

Page 22: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

22

Key Technology Uses

Enable searches, filters and ad hoc reporting functionality.

Provide ability to create manual exceptions as needed.

Page 23: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

23

Compliance/Risk Role Depending on the risk and control model

in place in your organization, you may play different roles in the process: Participation in governance or oversight

meetings. Perform independent testing. Tracking completion and mitigation of

exceptions. Identification and reporting of systemic issues.

Page 24: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

24

Summary Look at what makes sense for your

organization – the Risk/Reward Equation. Consider risk ranking items based on

objective factors and emerging areas of risk.

Consider basing the frequency of your reviews on the risk profile of the account.

Use technology to make your process more efficient, identify and track corrected deficiencies.

Page 25: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

25

Summary

The importance and impact of an Administrative Review can be greatly elevated if it is considered a living process directed at the most significant current risk.

In other words, you can’t design it once and forget about it.

Page 26: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

26

Questions?

Page 27: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

27

Appendix

Failure Mode & Effects Analysis ratings (FMEA)

Sample Administrative Review Questions

Page 28: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

28

Rating Severity of EffectLikelihood of Occurrence Ability to Detect

5

Almost certain loss of customers, reputational risk, and/or

regulatory risk

Very High: Failure is almost

inevitable

Little to no chance of detection

4

High probability of customer dissatisfaction and lost business,

reputational risk, and/or regulatory risk

High: Repeated Failures

Very low chance of detection

3

Noticeable to customers resulting in potential for lost business,

some reputational risk, and/or possible regulatory notice.

Moderate: Occasional

FailuresModerate chance

of detection

2

Minor defected noted by some customers and noticed by

discriminating customers. Minor reputational risk.

Low: Relatively few failures

High chance of detection

1 No EffectRemote: Failure

is unlikelyAlmost certain

detection

Rating Scale for FMEA

Page 29: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

29

Sample Administrative Review Questions1. Have you reviewed a copy of the governing instrument,

including all amendments and codicils on file?2. Based on the governing instrument, are the account

titles coded appropriately?3. Is there a specific 5 and 5 withdrawal power stated in

the governing instrument? a. Is there evidence in the file that the current power holder is

aware of their right to withdraw?b. If no, a notice and copy of the governing instrument must

be sent to the power holder.

Page 30: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

30

Sample Administrative Review Questions

4. Is the firm or firm associate named as Attorney-in-Fact a. Have we been notified of a POA for the beneficiary or

settler? b. Do we have an original or certified copy of the POA? c. Have we confirmed that the beneficiary or settlor is alive? d. Is the POA still in effect? e. If POA is not durable, have we confirmed that the

beneficiary or is still competent?f. Have all distributions requested by the Attorney-in-Fact

been made directly to a service provider, or to the beneficiary or grantor, or to an account in their name?

Page 31: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

31

Sample Administrative Review Questions5. Beneficiaries

a. Are all required income and principal beneficiaries set up on the system? 

b. Are proper beneficiaries receiving payments? c. Are W-9s on file for all current beneficiaries? 

6. Is the settlor or any current beneficiary mentally incompetent or a minor?

a. Do we have adequate documentation in the file? b. Does the instrument have a facility of payment clause? c. Are distributions being made in compliance with that

clause? d. If beneficiary is a minor, is a tickler established to alter

payee upon age attainment? 

Page 32: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

32

Sample Administrative Review Questions7. Are there any beneficiaries, co-trustees, or grantors who

are not U.S. citizens (NRAs)?a. Do we have a W-8 on file?b. If Grantor is an NRA, has the appropriate KYC approval from

the NRA KYC unit been obtained? 

8. Statementsa. Are the proper parties set up to receive statements?b. If statements are not being mailed to a beneficiary or

independent 3rd party, is the Committee set up to receive an annual statement?

Page 33: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

33

Sample Administrative Review Questions9. Are we making recurring payments from the account?

a. According to the document and beneficiary information, are payments still appropriate under current account circumstances?

b. Have all clients receiving recurring income payments been contacted within the last year?

c. If account is a simple trust, is all the income being distributed to the beneficiaries as appropriate? 

Page 34: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

34

Sample Administrative Review Questions10. Is there a co-fiduciary on the account?

a. Is there written approval in the file for general administrative duties?

b. Are there any specific decision-making powers granted to the co-trustee under the document?

c. If yes, are we complying with such powers?

11. Is this a discretionary account?a. Are discretionary distributions allowed:

1) from Income?2) from Principal?

b. Were appropriate approvals/ratifications obtained for all discretionary distributions made in the past 12 months? 

Page 35: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

35

Sample Administrative Review Questions12. Review the document for important dates/events (i.e.

attainment of age, annual accumulated income disbursements/transfers, etc.).

a. Are appropriate administrative ticklers established?

13. Fee Review – Part 1 a. Is the account charged full fees in accordance with current

Fee Schedule?b. Is the fee exception still appropriate for the account?c. Is there a restrictive fee clause in the document or a

separate fee agreement?d. If yes, are we complying?

Page 36: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

36

Sample Administrative Review Questions

14. Fee Review – Part 2 a. Is the fee coding correct?b. Is this account subject to Court supervision?c. Are all distributions made in accordance with a court order,

applicable document, or state statute?d. If accountings are to be sent to the court, have ticklers been

established to ensure they are being sent?e. Are necessary court orders and approvals of accountings on

file? 

15. Does the account hold Proprietary Funds (including money markets)?

1. Are appropriate disclosures on file for sole authority accounts?2. Is the signed authorization on file for co-trustee, IRA, or

directed/advisory accounts?

Page 37: 1 Personal and Institutional Trusts Administrative Reviews FIRMA National Training Conference April 15-19, 2007 David Cormak, Senior Vice President GWIM

37

Sample Administrative Review Questions16. Are there any restrictive investment clauses in the

document?a. Does the document prohibit the use of Proprietary Mutual

Funds?b. Are there other investment restrictions in the document? c. Are we complying with the noted restrictions? 

17. Does the account hold any Specialty Assets?a. Are the appropriate units actively involved with the

management of these specialty assets?

18. Are there any outstanding loans from the account to any borrowers, and/or has the account been pledged as collateral?

a. Is proper loan documentation on file?b. Are payments current?