28
1 Introduction to Introduction to Questionnaire Design Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois www.srl.uic.edu

1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

1

Introduction to Introduction to Questionnaire DesignQuestionnaire Design

Spring 2011 Seminar Series

Survey Research LaboratoryUniversity of Illinois

www.srl.uic.edu

Page 2: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

3

Survey Research Laboratory

Open vs. Closed QuestionsOpen vs. Closed Questions

• Open‑Ended Questions • Suggest no alternatives• Probing• Free exchange of ideas without bias • Extensive interviewer training• Elaborate coding schemes• Expensive and time‑consuming

Page 3: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

4

Survey Research Laboratory

Open vs. Closed QuestionsOpen vs. Closed Questions

• Closed‑Ended Questions Standardized questions and answers  Simple interviewer training  Easy to analyze  May make it too easy to answer without thinking May limit spontaneity Not best when

• asking for frequency of sensitive behaviors• there are numerous possible responses

Role of initial question development and pretesting

Page 4: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

5

Survey Research Laboratory

Cognitive Steps in AnsweringCognitive Steps in Answering QuestionsQuestions

1. Understand question.2. Search memory for information.3. Integrate information into

summary judgment.4. Translate judgment onto response

alternatives.

“Optimizing”

Page 5: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

6

Survey Research Laboratory

• Understand question. 

• Search memory for information.

• Integrate information into summary judgment. 

• Translate judgment onto response alternatives.

“Weak satisficing”

Cognitive StepsCognitive Steps

Page 6: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

7

Survey Research Laboratory

• Understand question. • Search memory for information.• Integrate information into summary

judgment.

• Translate judgment onto response alternatives.

“Strong satisficing”

Cognitive StepsCognitive Steps

Page 7: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

8

Survey Research Laboratory

• Respondent motivation• Respondent ability• Task difficulty

Factors Influencing SatisficingFactors Influencing Satisficing

Page 8: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

9

Survey Research Laboratory

•Response order•Acquiescence•Non-differentiation•Saying “don’t know”

Response Effects Explained by Response Effects Explained by Satisficing Satisficing

Page 9: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

10

Survey Research Laboratory

•Primacy

•Recency

Response order effects Response order effects

Page 10: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

11

Survey Research Laboratory

•Response order•Acquiescence•Non-differentiation•Saying “don’t know”

Response Effects Explained by Response Effects Explained by Satisficing Satisficing

Page 11: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

12

Survey Research Laboratory

Form A (agree I’s version):Individuals are more to blame than social conditions for crime and lawlessness in this country.

Form A (Agree I’s) Agree (I): 59.6%

Disagree (SC): 40.4 100 (473)

Form B (agree SCs version):Social conditions are more to blame than individuals for crime and lawlessness inthis country.

Form B (Agree SCs) Agree (SC): 56.8%

Disagree (I):43.2 100 (472)

Acquiescence Acquiescence

Page 12: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

13

Survey Research Laboratory

I like going to the movies. 

Strongly Agree Neither Disagree Stronglyagree disagree

Acquiescence Acquiescence

Do you like or dislike going to the movies? 

Like Dislike

Page 13: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

14

Survey Research Laboratory

•Response order•Acquiescence•Non-differentiation•Saying “don’t know

Response Effects Explained by Response Effects Explained by SatisficingSatisficing

Page 14: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

15

Survey Research Laboratory

Not important

Extremely

important

Good manners 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Tries hard to succeed

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Is honest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Is neat and clean 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Has sound judgment

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

How important is each of the following qualities for a child to have?

Non-differentiationNon-differentiation

Page 15: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

16

Survey Research Laboratory

•Response order•Acquiescence•Non-differentiation•Saying “don’t know  

Response Effects Explained by Response Effects Explained by Satisficing Satisficing

Page 16: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

17

Survey Research Laboratory

• Double-barreled questions

Question:Compared to one year ago, are you paying more, less, or about the same for your auto and life insurance?

Better Question:Compared to one year ago, are you now paying more, less, or about the same for…

a. auto insurance?b. life insurance?

Other IssuesOther Issues

Page 17: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

18

Survey Research Laboratory

• Specify who, what, when, where and how

Question:What is your total household income?

Better Question:In 2010, what was your total household income, before taxes? Please count income from all members of your household, including wages from employment, disability, social security, and public aid

Other IssuesOther Issues

Page 18: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

19

Survey Research Laboratory

• Specify through cues

Question:During the past 30 days, did you drink any beer?

Better Question:People drink beer in many places – for example, at home, at restaurants, at bars, sporting events, at friends’ homes, etc. During the past 30 days, did you drink any beer?

Other IssuesOther Issues

Page 19: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

20

Survey Research Laboratory

Ambiguous:How would you compare how close you are to family in your current neighborhood to how close you were in your old neighborhood? Would you say your family is closer here, further here, or the same?

Clearer:Compared to your last neighborhood, do you now live closer to your family, are you further from your family, or are you about the same distance?

Use words with singular meanings

Other IssuesOther Issues

Page 20: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

21

Survey Research Laboratory

• Response Options Should be consistent with the question

Should typically be exhaustive, including every possible answer

Categories should typically be mutually exclusive (no overlap)

Other IssuesOther Issues

Page 21: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

22

Survey Research Laboratory

• Numbering vs. Labeling Numbers alone

Partial labeling

Full labeling

Other IssuesOther Issues

Page 22: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

23

Survey Research Laboratory

• Constructing Response Scales Length of response scale

Using graphic images, such as thermometers and ladders, and card sorting for complex ratings

Other IssuesOther Issues

Page 23: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

24

Survey Research Laboratory

Physical Format ChecklistPhysical Format Checklist

Number all questions sequentially

Use large, clear type; don’t crowd

‘White space:’ Place more blank space between questions than between subcomponents of questions

List answer categories vertically instead of horizontally

Avoid double/triple ‘banking’ of response choices

Be consistent with direction of response categories

Page 24: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

25

Survey Research Laboratory

Physical Format Checklist (continued)Physical Format Checklist (continued)

Don’t split questions across pages. If necessary (e.g., question requires 1.5 pages), restate question and response categories on next page

Put special instructions on questionnaire as needed, next to question

Distinguish directions from questions – be consistent

Page 25: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

26

Survey Research Laboratory

Key References To Get StartedKey References To Get Started

Dillman, Don. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John, Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1999.

Bradburn, N, Sudman, S. and Wansink, B. Asking Questions: The Definitive Guide to Questionnaire design – for Market Research, Political Polls, and Social and Health Questionnaires. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2004.

See also past issues of Public Opinion Quarterly

Page 26: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

27

Survey Research Laboratory

Other ReferencesOther References

Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys. New York: Academic Press.

Krosnick, J.A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 213-236.

Krosnick, J.A., Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., Carson, R. T., Hanemann, W. M., Kopp, R. J., Mitchell, R. C., et al. (2002). The impact of "No Opinion" response options on data quality: Non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 371–403.

Page 27: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

28

Survey Research Laboratory

Survey Intro/Cover LetterSurvey Intro/Cover Letter

Introduction should indicate: who is conducting the survey the topics to be covered in the survey an assurance of confidentiality any IRB stipulations whether you offer how long it will

take depends on mode, topic, population

Page 28: 1 Introduction to Questionnaire Design Spring 2011 Seminar Series Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois

29

Survey Research Laboratory

Ordering the QuestionsOrdering the Questions

Put demographic questions at the end

Leave objectionable questions (e.g., income) for the end

First questions should be directly related to the topic as described in the introduction or advance/cover letter