1 DISH D ata I nformation SH aring Steering Committee Meeting 2 Meeting Purpose Update on Legal Workgroup activities & accomplishments Update on Technical Solution activities & accomplishments Update on Judicial User Group Activities Update on Joint Article Update from Center For Policy Research 3 Legal Work Group Held work group session at Daniels Fund on 11/19, participants included: 1 Magistrate 3 IV-D Attorneys State Department Staff DISH Management Team Weigh-ins from 3 other Magistrates 4 Legal Work Group Accomplishments & Decisions Agreement reached on documents to be filed for APA, eliminated several documents Discussed jurisdiction to hear parenting time issues in these case types statutory authority Left on table for further research/review: when to file interstate cases as Domestic or Juvenile There may be some best business practices and educational information that can be shared as DISH goes live 5 APA Docs Diana/Tracy This is a place holder for content you want to include related to decisions reached on what documents to file. *Chris do we really want to go over the list? Or is it enough to say we have all gone over it & lgl has looked at it? 6 Technical Feasibility & Solution Conducted a series of joint technical solution & design sessions 8 10 half day sessions 8 10 half day sessions Management Team, CSE Technical, & Judicial Technical Management Team, CSE Technical, & Judicial Technical Considered expanding project scope to reduce/eliminate paper filing with APA Considered expanding project scope to reduce/eliminate paper filing with APA 7 Benefits To Expanded Scope Faster case establishment/eliminates time spent sorting through documents & entering data Reduction/elimination of paper APA filing One, less obvious benefit, is the increase in the level of trust between the two agencies. This trust is what is allowing a paperless exchange of data. Eliminates duplicate data entry/errors 8 Solutions Evaluated PDF Exchange PDF image of documents with data Judicial creates paper on demand from images E-Form Exchange data and document templates Judicial creates paper on demand from templates Data Only Exchange data necessary to establish/administer Paper documents retained in CSE office 9 PDF Solution Pros: Eliminates filing of many paper forms Easy reproduction on demand Cons: Still must file some paper Requires image repository Process delayed by paper exchange 10 E-form Solution Pros: Eliminates filing of many paper forms No image repository required Cons: Still must file some paper Process delayed by paper exchange Complex implementation Tight coupling between Judicial & CSE systems 11 Data Only Pros: Eliminates filing of most (maybe all) paper forms No image repository required Process not delay by paper exchange Achievable solution Cons: Significant process change Change in responsibility & accountability Paperless Everyone must accept this 12 13 Open Questions & Actions How will Defaults be handled? Need Judicial Directive for Pilot May need legislative change for state- wide rollout Will their be resistance to paperless solution? Verification of filing Who is responsible & how is this done? 14 Technical Solution Next Steps Develop Schema for 1 st web service Clarify use of GJXDM/NIEM Begin web service design/development Establish necessary network connectivity Begin individual system design Continue data analysis & schema design for remaining web services Revisit Default Order Scenario Revise project plan and schedule 15 Judicial User Group Meeting Scheduled for February 13, 2008 Work on what to do with all of the data Court receives Provide some prototypes of screens, case initiation, judgments, support orders, etc. Develop programming specifications 16 Joint Article Dan/Diana Content Please I think this should be handled by CPR Dan *Chris Maureen is out of town but I think she might know more about this 17 CPR Update