45
1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

  • View
    226

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

1

Competitive AdvantageProfessor Stephen LawrenceLeeds School of Business

University of Colorado

ESSAM 2010

Page 2: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

2

Agenda Sustainable Competitive Advantage

Robust business model Extraordinary organizational elements Proprietary elements

Protecting Ideas & Innovation Intellectual Property Protection

Patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets Licensing

Page 3: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

3

Sustainable Competitive Advantage1. Is the business model robust?

Can we make money in good times and bad?

2. Are there superior organizational elements? Processes, capabilities, resource

3. Does the business have proprietary elements?

Patents, trade-secrets, special knowledge, …

Page 4: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

1. ROBUST BUSINESS MODELThree elements of competitive advantage

4

Page 5: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

5

A Robust Economic Model What is our value proposition?

Why will customers buy from us?

What is our business model? How will we make money?

What is our cost structure? Where are our costs?

Dell Supply Chain

Page 6: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

What is our VALUE PROPOSITION? Why will our target customers buy from us

and not the competition? What is our compelling argument for

purchase? Are our customers delighted to do business with

us? Can we create a blue ocean strategy?

Unique offering different from the competition?

6

Page 7: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

What is our BUSINESS MODEL? How will we make money?

Where? From whom? How often? How can we create a recurring revenue

stream? How robust is our business model?

Will it hold up in good times and bad?

7

Page 8: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Where is our COST STRUCTURE? Is revenue adequate in relation to capital? What are our customer acquisition &

retention costs? Are contribution margins attractive? Are cash cycle characteristics favorable?

8

Page 9: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

2. SUPERIOR ORGANIZATIONThree elements of competitive advantage

9

Page 10: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

10

Superior Organizational Elements Marketing capabilities Process & operational capabilities Innovation capabilities Examples

3M and Nokia Proctor & Gamble Zara

Your business concepts?

Page 11: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

3. PROPRIETARY ELEMENTSThree elements of competitive advantage

11

Page 12: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

12

1. Proprietary Elements Patents, copyrights, trade-secrets, … Advantages and problems Examples

Pharmaceuticals CAT scanners Jog stroller

Your business concepts?

Page 13: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

13

Three Critical Factors

1. The Appropriability Regime

2. Complementary Assets

3. Industry Structure & Maturity

Adapted from  Professor Joshua Gans, University of Melbourne, 2006; http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/tech/

Page 14: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

1. Appropriability Regime If a particular innovation, or the knowledge

on which it rests, can be completely “appropriated” it means that no one else can use it or copy it.

Allows a large “share” of the pie to be retained by the “supply” side

Offers innovators enormous bargaining power in the value chain..

Adapted from  Professor Joshua Gans, University of Melbourne, 2006; http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/tech/

Page 15: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Sources of Appropriability1. Intellectual property protection

Patents Finite length The right to prohibit “producing”

Copyrights The right to prohibit “copying”

2. Secrecy Trade secrets & non compete clauses Complexity and “tacit” knowledge

3. Speed (First Mover Advantages)

Adapted from  Professor Joshua Gans, University of Melbourne, 2006; http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/tech/

Page 16: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

2. Complementary Assets

Held Assets Brand name Distribution

channels Customer

relationships

Capabilities Manufacturing

capabilities Sales and service

expertise Customer

knowledge Organizational

culture and learning

Adapted from  Professor Joshua Gans, University of Melbourne, 2006; http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/tech/

Those assets necessary to translate an innovation into commercial returns

Page 17: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

17

Types of Complementary Assets

Coreknow-how

Distribution

ServicesComplementary technology

Competitive manufacturing

Suppliers

Adapted from  Professor Joshua Gans, University of Melbourne, 2006; http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/tech/

Page 18: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

18

3. Industry Structure & Maturity

Power ofSuppliers

Power ofCustomers

Ease ofSubstitution

Barriers toEntry

IndustryIndustryRivalry

Page 19: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

19

Changing Industry Boundaries Lower transport costs to expand geographic markets (e.g.

advent of bulk carriers and container vessels in shipping) Make it cheaper to customize products for national markets,

globalizing the industry Enhance product performance, bringing in new customers

and competitors Blur the boundaries between previously distinct activities

(e.g. computers, telecommunications, media) Narrow industry boundaries by allowing producers to tailor

their activities to smaller segments

Adapted from Iain Cockburn , Boston University, 2006; http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/tech/

Page 20: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Intellectual PropertyProfessor Stephen LawrenceLeeds School of Business

University of Colorado at Boulder

Page 21: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Uses of Intellectual Property Protection

Prevent competitors from appropriating your IP Control

Limit who uses IP, where, how often, terms … Value

Extract value from IP (e.g., licensing) Sharing

Provides rules for sharing IP

Page 22: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Value of IP

Jason Haislmaier, Holme Robert Owen LLC, January 23, 2007

Page 23: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Tools for IP Protection

Jason Haislmaier, Holme Robert Owen LLC, January 23, 2007

Page 24: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

PatentsPatent: grants holder protection from others making, using, or selling similar idea

Page 25: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Patents Right to Exclude others for 20 years

Quid pro quo: right to exclude in exchange for disclosure Traditional justification: incentives for innovation

Standard for patentability (US) First to invent (in Europe, first to file) Three Criteria

Non-obviousness (to someone schooled in the art) Novelty (beyond what already is patented) Utility (a potentially useful description)

Specialised examiners have much discretion No explicit penalties for mistakes) “There are as many patent offices as there are patent examiners”

Adapted from  Professor Joshua Gans, University of Melbourne, 2006; http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/tech/

Page 26: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Patents in Force (2000)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patents

Page 27: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Patent Infringement Many businesses, inventions, or innovations

are results of improvements on, or modifications of, existing products.

Copying and improving on a product: May be perfectly legal A good business strategy.

Products can be licensed from the patent holder.

Advisable to hire a patent attorney to ensure no possibility of patent infringement.

Page 28: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

CopyrightA legal concept giving the creator of an original work exclusive rights to it for a limited time

Page 29: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Copyrights Right to Exclude others from copying for a long time

No Quid pro quo Rights granted without standardized disclosure mechanism

Traditional justification: Protecting artistic works Standard for copyrighting

A ban on copying precise expression No standard of utility or novelty itself

Except if expression itself is duplicated Certification and registration are possible, not required

Copyrights are registered with Library of Congress Usually do not require an attorney. Term of the copyright is the life of the author plus 70 years

Adapted from  Professor Joshua Gans, University of Melbourne, 2006; http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/tech/

Page 30: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Copyright Issues Issues surrounding access to

material on the Internet have led to major legal battles for the entertainment industry Example: Napster and DRM

Copyright cases often revolve around “subjective” criteria Example: Does software

duplicate the “look-and-feel” of a competitive application

Page 31: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

TrademarksA distinctive sign or indicator of some kind which is used by an individual, business organization or other legal entity to identify uniquely the source of its products and/or services to consumers, and to distinguish its products or services from those of other entities.

TM

Page 32: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Trademarks Right to stop others from confusing your

potential customers Limitless duration as long as business is

ongoing More “property rights” than “intellectual

rights” Symbols

® for federally registered trademarks TM for any unregistered trademark SM for any unregistered service mark

Adapted from  Professor Joshua Gans, University of Melbourne, 2006; http://www.mbs.edu/home/jgans/tech/

Page 33: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Trademarks A distinguishing word, name,

or symbol used to identify a product Can last indefinitely Can be filed solely on intent to

use the trademark in interstate or foreign commerce

Can also be filed with intent to use in the future

Page 34: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Trade SecretsA formula, practice, process, design, instrument, pattern, or compilation of information used by a business to obtain an advantage over competitors or customers: "confidential information".

Page 35: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Trade Secrets Right to keep knowledge a secret Protection against others revealing or disclosing

information that could be damaging to business. Have a life as long as the idea or process remains a secret. Not covered by any federal law but is recognized under a

governing body of common laws in each state. Entrepreneur needs to take proper precautions

Easily created, easily lost Legal action can be taken only after the secret has been

revealed High standards for prosecuting a case

Page 36: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Trade Secret Law Trade secrets are not registered Once secrecy is gone, trade secret is gone Enforced by contract

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) Confidentiality agreements

Legal action can be taken only after the secret has been revealed High standards for prosecuting a case

Page 37: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

LicensingContractual agreement giving rights to others to use intellectual property in return for a royalty or fee.

Page 38: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Licensing Provides means to “share” IP Types of licensing

Patent license agreement: specifies how the licensee would have access to the patent.

Trademark: involves a franchising agreement. Copyrights.

Licensing has become a revenue boom for many Fortune 500 companies.

Page 39: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Licensing Questions Will customers recognize licensed property? How well does the licensed property complement my

products or services? How much experience do I have with the licensed

property? What is the long-term outlook for the licensed property? What kind of protection does the licensing agreement

provide? What commitment do I have in terms of payment of

royalties, sales quotas, and so on? Are renewal options possible and under what terms?

Page 40: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Developing an IP Strategy

Jason Haislmaier, Holme Robert Owen LLC, January 23, 2007

Page 41: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Testing for Competitive AdvantageSWOT analysis

41

Page 42: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

SWOT Diagram

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swot_analysis

Page 43: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

How can you create a sustainable competitive advantage for your concept?

Consider Robust business model Extraordinary organizational elements Proprietary elements

Can you create a blue ocean strategy?

Team Assignment

Page 44: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

Tavazo Co. case What problems does Tavazo confront with its plan to grow

internationally? Which of these do you think are typical of small businesses

that wish to become international? What are the particular problems and opportunities of a

family business? What criteria should Tavazo use when developing its

international strategy and selecting international markets? How might Tavazo participate in the international value

chain in its industry? What is most appropriate for Tavazo - horizontal vs. vertical integration?

44

Page 45: 1 Competitive Advantage Professor Stephen Lawrence Leeds School of Business University of Colorado ESSAM 2010

45

Competitive AdvantageProfessor Stephen LawrenceLeeds School of Business

University of Colorado

ESSAM 2010