Upload
pearl-stafford
View
232
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Siemens Wind Power
2007-05-08 Power Generation 2Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
EWEC 2006
Noise Optimization of a Multi-Megawatt Wind Turbine
Aero-acoustic noise measurements of an SWT-2.3-93
Aero-acoustic noise calculations of an SWT-2.3-93 and comparison with measurements
Posibilities for low-noise power production
Conclusions
2007-05-08 Power Generation 3Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise meassurements of an SWT-2.3-93
Aerial view of Høvsøre National Test-site for large prototype wind turbines
SWT-2.3-93
2007-05-08 Power Generation 4Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise meassurements of an SWT-2.3-93
Turbine
Turbine rated power: 2300kW
Blade length: 45m
Control system: Variable speed, pitch control
Tower height: 80m
Acoustic noise recording and processing
Hardware: Brüel & Kjær
Software: Brüel & Kjær (Pulse)
Measurement location: On ground 100m downwind of rotor
Temporal resolution of averages: 10s bins
Frequency resolution of averages: 1/12 octave spectra
Turbine data logging (pow, pitch, rpm, wind etc): Full inclusion in noise recording
2007-05-08 Power Generation 5Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise meassurements of an SWT-2.3-93
The acoustic data was recorded during 2 consecutive days in may 2006.
Approximately 11hrs of data
3D data matrix to populate with recordings
1st dimension: Wind: 4 to 12 m/s
2nd dimension: Pitch: -4 to 12 degrees
3rd dimension: Rotor speed: 9-18rpm
Post-processing details of 10s binned 1/12 octave spectra
Background noise subtraction
High frequency bird noise identification and subtraction
2007-05-08 Power Generation 6Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise meassurements of an SWT-2.3-93
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1870
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
rpm
so
un
dp
ow
er
[dB
]
Measured Soundpower levels for all 10s binned spectra
-3 to -1 deg pitch, 4-8 m/s wind-3 to -1 deg pitch, 8-12 m/s wind
-1 to 1 deg pitch, 4-8 m/s wind
-1 to 1 deg pitch, 8-12 m/s wind
1 to 3 deg pitch, 0-4 m/s wind1 to 3 deg pitch, 4-8 m/s wind
3 to 5 deg pitch, 0-4 m/s wind
3 to 5 deg pitch, 4-8 m/s wind
3 to 5 deg pitch, 8-12 m/s wind5 to 7 deg pitch, 0-4 m/s wind
5 to 7 deg pitch, 4-8 m/s wind
7 to 9 deg pitch, 0-4 m/s wind7 to 9 deg pitch, 4-8 m/s wind
9 to 11 deg pitch, 0-4 m/s wind
9 to 11 deg pitch, 4-8 m/s wind
11 to 13 deg pitch, 0-4 m/s wind11 to 13 deg pitch, 4-8 m/s wind
2007-05-08 Power Generation 7Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise meassurements of an SWT-2.3-93
Note: High rotor-speed sensitivity, less pitch sensitivity and very litle wind sensitivity on acoustics
8687
87
88
88
89
89
90
90
90
91
91
91
92
92
92
93
93
93
94
94
94
95
95
95
9696
96
97
97
97
98
98
98
99
99
99
100
100
100
101
101
101
101
102
102
102 10
3
103
103
104
104
104
105
105
105
106
106
106
107
107
107
108
108
108
rpm
pit
ch [
deg
]
Measured (red) Soundpower contours [dBa]
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2007-05-08 Power Generation 8Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise calculations of an SWT-2.3-93
The aero-acoustic source modelThe aero-acoustic source model
5 types of noise:
• TE bluntness vortex shedding (BPM model)
• Laminar boundary layer TE vortex shedding (BPM model)
• Turbulent boundary layer TE (BPM model)
• Turbulent boundary layer separation (BPM model)
• Turbulent inflow (Amiet model with simplified Guidati)
Model implementation: NAFNoise (Moriarty, NREL)
Boundary layer inputs: XFoil (Drela, MIT).
2007-05-08 Power Generation 9Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise calculations of an SWT-2.3-93
The aero-acoustic propagation modelThe aero-acoustic propagation model
Modifications to simple radial propagation from a point source:
• Rotor distributed sources
• Directivity (blade acts an acoustic dipole)
• Air absorption
• Atmospheric shear correction
• Doppler shift
Absent modifications:
• Non-flat terrain
• Multiple sound ray reflections due to shear
2007-05-08 Power Generation 10Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise calculations of an SWT-2.3-93
Superposition of calculated soundpower contours at 8m/s
8687
87
88
88
89
89
90
90
90
91
91
91
92
92
92
93
93
93
94
94
94
95
95
95
9696
96
97
97
97
98
98
98
99
99
99
100
100
100
101
101
101
101
102
102
102 10
3
103
103
104
104
104
105
105
105
106
106
106
107
107
107
108
108
108
rpm
pit
ch [
deg
]
8990
90
91
91
92
92
93
93
94
94
94
95
95
95
96
96
96
97
97
97
98
98
98
9899
99
99
100
100
100
101
101
101
102
102
102
102
103
103
103
103
104
104
104
104
105
105
105
106
106
106
107108
Measured (red) and calculated (black) Soundpower contours [dBa]
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2007-05-08 Power Generation 11Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise calculations of an SWT-2.3-93
102
103
104
65
70
75
80
85
90
1/3 octave frequencies [Hz]
So
un
d P
ow
er
[dB
(a)]
wind = 5.2 m/s. pitch = 7.3 deg. rpm = 9.85 Measured: 89.6 dB(a). Calculated: 91.4 dB(a)
turbulentinflow
suction sideTBL
total
pressure sideTBL
102
103
104
65
70
75
80
85
90
1/3 octave frequencies [Hz]
So
un
d P
ow
er [
dB
(a)]
wind = 10 m/s. pitch = -2 deg. rpm = 9.75 Measured: 97.3 dB(a). Calculated: 91.9 dB(a)
turbulentinflow
separationTBL
total
Spectral comparisons at low rotor-speed:
2007-05-08 Power Generation 12Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Aero-acoustic noise calculations of an SWT-2.3-93
102
103
104
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
1/3 octave frequencies [Hz]
So
un
d P
ow
er [
dB
(a)]
wind = 11.6 m/s. pitch = 9.5 deg. rpm = 17.1 Measured: 106.7 dB(a). Calculated: 104.9 dB(a)
suction sideTBL
total
pressure sideTBL
turbulentinflow
102
103
104
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
1/3 octave frequencies [Hz]
So
un
d P
ow
er [
dB
(a)]
wind = 10.8 m/s. pitch = 1.5 deg. rpm = 17.1 Measured: 107.6 dB(a). Calculated: 107.3 dB(a)
turbulentinflow
suction sideTBL
total
pressure sideTBL
separationTBL
Spectral comparisons at high rotor-speed:
2007-05-08 Power Generation 13Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Posibilities for low-noise power production
8687
87
88
88
89
89
90
90
90
91
91
91
92
92
92
93
93
93
94
94
94
95
95
95
96
96
96
97
97
97
98
9898
9999
99
10010
0
100
101
101
101
101
102
102
102
103
103
103
104
104
104
105
105
105
106
106
106
107
107
107
108
108
108
rpm
pit
ch [
deg
]
Measured Soundpower contours [dBa] with superposed Power contours [kW] at 8m/s wind-625
-600-575-550
-525-500-475
-450
-425-400
-375 -350-325
-300-275
-250-225
-200-175-150
-125-100
-75-50
-50
-25
-25
0
0
25
25
50
50
75
75
100
100
125
125
150
150
175
175
200
200
225
225
250
250
275
275
300
300
325
325
350
350
375
375
400
400
425
425
450
450
475
475
500
500
525525
550 550575
575600 600
625
625
625
625
650
650
650650
675
675
675
700
700 700
700
725
725
725
725
750
750 750
750
775
775 775
775
800
800 800
800825
825 825
825
850
850
850875
875
875
900
900
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2007-05-08 Power Generation 14Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Posibilities for low-noise power production
4 6 8 10 12 14 1680
85
90
95
100
105
110
Wind speed at hub height [m/s]
Sou
ndpo
wer
[dB
(a)
Calculated noise curve for the SWT-2.3-93
Aero-acoustic low-noise analysisAero-acoustic low-noise analysis
Max. sound emission at 11m/s, just before rated power is reached.
Low-noise power production is aimed at the operation point at 11m/s hub height wind.
Quick ‘n dirty gradient analysis
Pitch variation:
-1.05 dB/deg, -0.2 %AEP/dB, 0.0 %flapload/dB
maxRPM variation:
0.72 dB/rpm, -0.5 %AEP/dB, -1.5 %flapload/dB
Chord variation:
-0.03 dB/(%chord) 2.5 %AEP/dB, 28 %flapload/dB
Blade thickness variation:
-0.02 dB/(%thick), -8.4 %AEP/dB, 4.5 %flapload/dB
2007-05-08 Power Generation 15Siemens Wind Power
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Conclusions and future work
Acoustic model validation
Turbulent boundary layer separation noise is qualitatively well reproduced by model, but is overpredicted. Rotational 3D-effect that postpones stall might be part of the explanation.
TE bluntness model overpredicts measurements by 5+ dBs, hence excluded. Turbulent boundary layer TE noise model fits measurements well. Turbulent inflow noise model generally fits measured low frequencies well.
Low-noise turbine operation
Positive pitching (away from stall) is the primary handle according to model – however, measurements indicate much less pitch sensitivity. Reduced RPM also reduces noise at a low cost according to both model and measurements.
Chord- and thickness-variations do not show significant impact on acoustics, and AEP- and/or load-cost is significant.
Every dB-favorable change has a cost, either on AEP or loads.
Overall the model can deliver accurate predictions, once the deficiencies (bluntness) and weaknesses (separation noise) are identified. It will assist future blade design.
S
iem
ens
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n 20
05.
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Thank you for your attention