12
+ Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+ Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

Genevieve RawlingsMATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni18 November 2014

SAMR –

Innovating

Student Learning

Page 2: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

SAMR

Substitution Augmentation

Modification

Redefinition

Page 3: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

SAMR

Substitution –No functional change. Usually teacher-centered.

Augmentation = Immediate feedback = more engaged learning

We all use technology in our classrooms just by using the document camera to substitute for the chalkboard/whiteboard when we place directions under the document camera or have students copy notes.

However, when we use the document camera to allow the whole class to see the work of others we augment learning because students are able to get instant feedback and critique others’ work without the need of a copy machine.

Page 4: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

SAMR - moving toward

student centered learning Modification

– Students are able to collaborate with each other and/or the teacher. Questions to come from students more often than the teacher.

Redefinition – technology enhances student learning. Collaboration is promoted and questions come from students most often.

Page 5: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

SAMR - moving toward

student centered learning Modification

– Students are able to collaborate with each other and/or the teacher. Questions to come from students more often than the teacher.

Redefinition – technology enhances student learning. Collaboration is promoted and questions come from students most often.

Substitution –No functional change. Usually teacher-centered.

Augmentation = Immediate feedback = more engaged learning

Page 6: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+Things to consider…

You may want to start with a piece of technology you are comfortable with yourself.

As you try out new apps or pieces of technology- seek out resources and/or people for support.

Technology should be seen as a tool to enhance learning. Technology is not the only resource we have as educators.

How does this continuum align to the Danielson Framework for Teaching?

For more information, visit: http://www.educatorstechnology.com/search/label/Samrl%20model

Page 7: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

SAMR –

Personal Examples

Substitution –No functional change. Usually teacher-centered.

Examples:-Using the document camera and PowerPoint to present lessons.-Having students turn in their work using GAFE.-Sending feedback forms for teachers to fill out based on a students’ behavior to collect data.

Page 8: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

SAMR –

Personal Examples

Augmentation = Immediate feedback = more engaged learning

Examples:-Using the document camera to show students each other's work.-Using Google Classroom to give students a grade.-Sending data back to teachers weekly so that they could see overall progress of the student.

Page 9: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

SAMR –

Personal Examples

Modification – Students are able to collaborate with each other and/or the teacher. Questions to come from students more often than the teacher.

Examples:-Using the document camera to show students each other's work and allow students to have a discussion around feedback.-Using Google Classroom to allow students to critique one another’s work.-Sharing the behavior data with the student over GAFE so that the student could set goals based on his/her progress.

Page 10: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

SAMR –

Personal Examples

Redefinition – technology enhances student learning. Collaboration is promoted and questions come from students most often.

Examples:-Students are able to submit work through using a variety of webtools, reference one another’s work, and get feedback on their work.

Page 11: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+

SAMR

Substitution Augmentation

Modification

Redefinition

I have utilized technology in my classroom since day 1 of my student internship. I was lucky to be able to have a SmartBoard during both internships in which students were able to interact with their learning. However, my first year of teaching, my laptop wasn’t smart enough for my SmartBoard so it was used as a glorified whiteboard. In this case, the SmartBoard/glorified whiteboard was simply a substitute for a chalkboard. I really like the SAMR model because it nicely depicts what I have always said about technology- it’s advantage is dependent on how it is utilized.

Page 12: + Genevieve Rawlings MATH 684.251 Instructor: John SanGiovanni 18 November 2014 SAMR – Innovating Student Learning

+References

Puentedura, R.R. (2012). The SAMR model: Background and exemplars. Retrieved Retrieved November 16, 2014 from

http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2012/08/23/SAMR_BackgroundExemplars.pdf

SAMR Model - Technology Is Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved November 16, 2014 fromhttps://sites.google.com/a/msad60.org/technology-is-learning/samr-model

Rao, A. (2013) What's the difference between 'using technology' and 'technology integration'? Teachbytes. Retrieved November 16, 2014 from

http://teachbytes.com/2013/03/29/whats-the-difference-between-using-technology-and technology-integration/