© Copyright 2006 POSC Overview and Introduction Regional SIG Meetings March 22-23, 2006, Houston, Texas June 13-14, 2006, Stavanger, Norway June 20-21,

© Copyright 2006 POSC

Overview and Introduction

Regional SIG Meetings March 22-23, 2006, Houston, Texas

June 13-14, 2006, Stavanger, NorwayJune 20-21, 2006, Aberdeen, Scotland


Regional SIG Meeting Roles• All

– Maximize value delivered from POSC to industry and from industry to POSC

• POSC and SIG Members– Maximize value delivered from POSC to members and from

members to POSC• Translation:

– Learn what’s cooking and get involved• As a patron, a server, a chef, a supplier, a manager, …

– Contribute items you need/want for “tomorrow’s” menu.• As a champion, subject expert, connoisseur, cook, or guest


Overall Standards ProcessStage Description

0 Opportunity Discovery, Evaluation (ongoing), <decide>

1 Planning, Review, <decide>

2 Requirements, Review, <decide>

3 First Specification Iteration, Review, <decide>

4 Iteration Cycles of Revision and Review, <decide>

5 Final Reviews, <decide>, Release

6 Promotion, Support [<decide> May go to 0 for upgrade]

7 Periodic Effectiveness (Value Delivery) Review [<decide> May go to 0 for upgrade or retirement]


Success Factors• Collaboration – steer [just] clear of competitiveness • Value – neither theory nor art are sufficient reasons,

must enhance real business advantages• Change Agency – standardization requires change

– Innovation– Resources– Marketing– Planning– Execution


Oct 17-19 Events• Public Seminar and Vendor Exhibition (Oct 19, Thursday)

– Current reports from actual experiences and plans from oil companies, service companies, and software companies.

• SIG Working Meetings – Technical Teams

• We address implementation feedback and continuing detailed specification issues

– Use Case and Requirements Team• We address possible future areas of focus: drilling reports, completions,

environmental, well services, well stimulation, service rig reporting.

– Implementation Support Team• People supporting WITSML-enabled environments share lessons learned

and current issues and challenges.


May 19: WITSML Public Seminar

• Meeting Host: BP • Exhibitors (from May 2006)

– Baker Hughes, IDS, INT, Knowledge Systems, Merrick Systems, Paradigm, POSC, Roxar, Schlumberger, SDC Geologix, Sense Intellifield, Smith Bits, Wellstorm Development


June 14 & 20 and Oct 20: Integrated Production Operations SIG Meetings

• June 14 – Stavanger (NPD)• June 20 – Aberdeen (ExxonMobil)• October 20 – Aberdeen (BP)


Meeting Plan• Jan 11. India. Preliminary Geophysics and WITSML

Deployment meetings• Mar. 22-23. Houston. SIG Meetings• May 9-12. Houston. WITSML and IntOps Events [SLB host]• June 13-14, 20-21. Norway and UK. Regional SIG Meetings• Sep. 19-20. Houston. SIG Meetings• Oct. 17-20. Europe. WITSML and IntOps Events [BP host]• Nov. 8. Houston. Annual Member Meeting• Nov. 28-Dec. 1. Europe. Regional SIGs (2 locations)


Standards Activity in 2005 and 2006

Drilling

Production

Geology

Data Mgt

Regulatory

Technology

Consulting

Drilling

Production

Geology

Data Mgt

Regulatory

Technology

Consulting

Geophysics


Drilling Portfolio

Standard Type History Stable Active Next Comments

WITSML Drilling & Family

Data Xch

Start 2001,

Xfer 2003

V1.2 V1.3.1 TBD Stage 6, ’06 13%

- WITSML Completion

Data Xch

B 2004 N/A N/A Q2 Stage 4 5V1.3.1 supplement

Norway Daily Drilling Project

Data Xch

Start pending

N/A N/A TBD OUTSIDE,Stage 1, ’06 2%

Drilling (WITSML) SIG Facilitation, ’06 10%


WITSML Drilling: Vision• Now

– Mainly geosteering support– Mainly straight-through source to operator– Usage

• Statoil and Hydro 100%, • 2+ Majors High-end Wells, • 1+ Major Significant use by early ‘07

• +2 or 3 Years– Broader range of business processes– Sufficient maturity for aggregation/QC by service companies– Greater usage by operators

• Quantification– Considering profiling WITSML Drilling benefits in terms of project costs

and savings for typical drilling projects


Board

Economics

ReservoirEngineering

ExplGeology

Petrophysics PetroleumEngineering

Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering

ProductionOperationsGeophysics

DrillingOperations

Completion &Workover

E&P Subject Areas: WITSML Coverage

Can we use this image to portray the growth in WITSML coverage?


General Board

Economics


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations



Enhancements for Production beginning with Volume and Activity Reporting, continuing with PRODML towards Optimization.

Network Model Volume Report Activity Report

Log,WellLog

WellPath

Well Wellbore Trajectory

CRS, ProjectionsUnits of Measure


General Board

Economics


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations



At a future time, we could consider the viability of data exchange Standards for facility data, reservoir data, economics data, etc. filling out the E&P space.


epiXMLBoard

Economics


ExplGeology


Drilling

Engineering

ProductionGeology

Production

Engineering

Facilities

Engineering


DrillingOperations


What’s in a Name? epiXML Family

Regardless of the naming pattern, this is one integrated Standards Family with a great deal of reuse and consistency.

This anticipates a successful integration of PRODML results.

WITSML

PRODML?ML

?ML

?ML

?ML


Production PortfolioStandard Type History Stable Active Next Comments

WITSML Production, including Reporting

Data Xch

Prior 1999,Start 2005

N/A N/A Q2 Reporting, Stage 4 5,Deployment In Norway,’06 14%

WITSML Production Optimization

Data Xch

Start 2005,Xfr Q3

N/A N/A N/A OUTSIDE: “PRODML”,Stage 3, ’06 7%Pilots Apr – Aug.

WITSML Production DTS

Data Xch

Start 2004 N/A 1.3.1 TBD Stage 6, Deploymentsby BP and Shell

WITSML Production Lab (Fluid Analysis)

Data Xch

Xfr 2004,Start 2005

N/A N/A Q2 Stage 3, ’06 2%

Norway IIP Project Mixed Start 2004 N/A N/A N/A OUTSIDE, ’06 2%Stage 3; Statoil, Hydro.

Production (Integrated Operations) SIG Facilitation, ’06 8%


Production Portfolio: Vision• Now

– Daily Reporting to Partners: • Ready for Public Review, Deployment starting in Norway

– PRODML Work Group due to complete end of August• Three basic optimization use cases: specifications and pilot testing

– Distributed Temperature Survey Standard published• Field deployments by BP and Shell (Lios, SLB, Weatherford)

• +2 or 3 Years– Co-existence with / adaptation for OPC Foundation UA– Integration of Optimization and Reporting– Beginning of Automation of Administration, Scheduling, etc.– Integration with Equipment and Facility reference standards

• Quantitative / Qualitative Value – Baseline in ’07.


Geology PortfolioStandard Type History Stable Active Next Comments

WITSML Geology wellLog

Data Xch

Start 2004,Rel 2005

N/A 1.3.1 TBD Stage 6, ’06 2.5%,DIGGS use

WITSML Geology Depth Registration

Data Xch

Start 2004 N/A N/A Q2 Stage 5, ’06 2%supplement to V1.3.1

PWLS Ref Start 2001 2.0 2.0 Q1 Stage 6, ’06 5.5%Shell, XOM, Petris

RP66 (DLIS) Data Xch

Xfr 1996 1 & 2 1 & 2 N/A Stage 6, ’06 0.5%

WellLogML Data Xch

Start 2000 1 2 draft N/A Stage 6 & 7, transition to WITSML

LogGraphicsML Data Xch

Start 2000 1 N/A N/A Stage 6 & 7

LAS (CWLS) to WITSML Utility

O.S. Utility

Start 2005 N/A N/A Q1 Stage 3,Ready for First Review

Geology (PWLS) SIG Facilitation, ’06 4.5%


Data Management PortfolioStandard Type History Stable Active Next Comments

WITSML Well Path Profile Start 2004 N/A 1.3.1 TBD Stage 4, ’06 1.0%, Review by “Tech Team”

WellHeaderML Data Xch

Start 2000 2.0 N/A N/A Stage 6, ’06 1.0%UK Usage, PPDM Profile

WellChemicalML Data Xch

Start 2002 1.0 N/A N/A Stage 6UK Usage

WellPathML Data Xch

Start 2001 1.0 N/A N/A Stage 6 & 7, WITSML, PPDM Profile

Well Identity Service

Ref Service

Start 2004 N/A N/A TBD Stage 3, ’06 1.8%RFP in Q2

Epicentre Data Model

Start 1991 3.0 N/A TBD Stage 6, ’06 0.5%Ref. SLB and LGC

Geoshare Data Model

Start 1992 13.0 14.0 N/A Stage 6


Data Management PortfolioStandard Type History Stable Active Next Comments

Reference Entities

Ref Start 1991 Varied Varied TBD Stage 6, ’06 2.7%

CRS/Geodetics Ref Start 1993 Varied Varied TBD For WITSML, Phase 2-Stage 4, ’06 0.8%

Lithology Ref Start 2005 N/A 1.3.1 Q1 Phase 2-Stage 3, ’06 0.8%

E&P Catalogue Ref Start 2003 0.5 0.5 TBD Stage 6, ’06 1.8%

E&P Bus Pro Ref Model

Ref Start 2004 1.0 1.0 TBD Stage 6, ’06 0.1%

Data Management (DSS) SIG Facilitation, ’06 1.8%Liaison 0.2%, Outside 1.0%, Help 0.5%


Regulatory Portfolio


WITSML Regulatory Permitting

Data Xch

Start 2004 N/A N/A Q3 California, Stage 5,4-6 states, Stage 2,’06 3%


Geophysical Portfolio


GeophysicalML Data Xch

Start 2000 N/A N/A N/A As reference only

WITSML Geophysical

Data Xch

N/A N/A N/A N/A APAC Stage 1 & 2,’06 2%

Geophysical SIG Facilitation, ’06 2%


Alan Doniger, POSC Chief Technology OfficerEmail: [email protected]

Phone: +1 713 267-5124Fax: +1 713 784-9219

http://www.posc.org

http://www.witsml.org

http://www.prodml.org

Documents

© Copyright 2006 POSC Overview and Introduction Regional SIG Meetings March 22-23, 2006, Houston, Texas June 13-14, 2006, Stavanger, Norway June 20-21,