View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Chapter 8
Human Resources in Operations Management
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 2Ch 8 - 2© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Human Resources In Strategic Planning
Importance of employeesEducation & training - long-term
investmentsEmployees
broad latitude in jobstrained in wide range of skillsempowered to improve quality & service
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 3Ch 8 - 6© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Evolution of Job Design 1900s to 1960sScientific Management/Assembly Lines
Task specialization Minimal worker
skills Repetition Minimal job training Mass production
Piece-rate wages Time as efficiency Minimal job
responsibility Tight supervisory
control
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 4Ch 8 - 7© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Evolution Of Job Design 1970s to 1990s
Horizontal job enlargement
Vertical job enlargement
Extensive job training
Job responsibility & empowerment
Job control
Training & education Job rotation Higher skill levels Team problem
solving Employee
involvement & interaction
Focus on quality
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 5Ch 8 - 8© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Elements of Job Design
Task AnalysisWorker Analysis
Environmental Analysis
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 6Ch 8 - 9© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Task Analysis
Description of tasks Task sequence Function of tasks Frequency of tasks Criticality of tasks Relationship with
other jobs/tasks
Performance requirements Information requirements Control requirements Error possibilities Task duration(s) Equipment requirements
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 7Ch 8 - 10© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 2/e
Worker Analysis
Capability Performance Evaluation Skill level Physical Mental stress Boredom
Motivation Number of workers Level of
responsibility Monitoring level Quality responsibility Empowerment level
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 8Ch 8 - 11© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Environmental Analysis
Work place location Process location Temperature and
humidity Lighting Ventilation
Safety Logistics Space requirements Noise Vibration
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 9Ch 8 - 12© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Job AnalysisStudy how job should be done
Tools:
Process flowchart - analyze process steps
Worker-machine chart - study time utilization
Motion study - study human motions in tasks
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 10Ch 8 - 14© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Desk operator fills out work order
Date: 9/11
Analyst: Calvin
Job: Copying Job
Work order placed in “waiting job” box
Job picked up by operator and read
Job carried to appropriate copy machine
Operator waits for machine to vacate
Operator loads paper
Operator sets machine
Operator performs and completes job
Job filed alphabetically in completed shelves
Job waits for pick up
Job moved by cashier for pick up
Cashier completes transaction
Operator inspects job for irregularities
Cashier packages job (bag, wrap, or box)
Page: 1
D
DDDD
DDDDD
DD
D
D
Process Flowchart
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 11Ch 8 - 15© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Worker-Machine Chart
Job Photo-Id Cards Date 10/14
Time Operator Time Photo Machine
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
-10
Key in customer data on card
Feed data card in
Position customer for photo
Take picture
Inspect card & trim edges
Idle
Idle
Idle
Idle
Photo/card processed
Accept card
Begin photo process
2.6
0.4
1.0
0.6
3.4
1.2
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 12Ch 8 - 16© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Motion Study
Frank & Lillian GilbrethFind one “best way” to do taskDivide task into therbligs
search, select, grasp, holdUse videotape to study motions
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 13Ch 8 - 17© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
General Guidelines For Motion Study
Efficient Use Of Human BodyWork - simplified, rhythmic & symmetricHand/arm motions - coordinated & simultaneousEmploy full extent of physical capabilitiesConserve energy - use machines, minimize
distances, use momentumTasks - simple, minimal eye contact & muscular
effort, no unnecessary motions, delays or idleness
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 14Ch 8 - 18© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Efficient Arrangement Of WorkplaceTools, material, equipment - designated, easily
accessible locationSeating & work area - comfortable & healthy
Efficient Use Of EquipmentEquipment & mechanized tools enhance worker
abilitiesUse foot-operated equipment to relieve hand/arm
stressConstruct & arrange equipment to fit worker use
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 15Ch 8 - 19© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Work Measurement
Estimate standard time required to perform a task
Methods of performing work measurement
Stopwatch time studyElemental standard time filesPredetermined motion timesWork sampling
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 16Ch 8 - 22© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 t t NtRF
Time Study Observation Sheet
t
t
t
t
R
R
R
R
Place top on sandwich,slice and stack
Place ham, cheese, and lettuce on bread
Spread mayonnaiseon both slices
Grasp and layoutbread slices1
2
3
4
Identification of operation Sandwich Assembly
Operator Approval Observer
Smith Jones Russell
Cycles Summary
Date
.04 .05 .05 .04 .06 .05 .06 .06 .07 .05 .53 .053 1.05 .056
.04 .38 .72 1.051.40 1.76 2.13 2.50 2.89 3.29
.07 .06 .07 .08 .08 .08.07 .07 .10 .09
.11 .44 .79 1.13 1.47 1.83 2.21 2.60 2.98 3.37
.77 .077 .0771.00
.11.12 .14 .12 .12.13.13.13 .14 .14 1.28 1.28 1.10 .141
.93.23 .55 1.25 1.60 1.96 2.34 2.72 3.12 3.51
.12.10 .08 .09 .12 .10.11 .11 .10.10 1.03 1.03 1.10 .113
.33 .67 1.011.34 1.712.07 2.44 2.82 3.24 3.61
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 17Ch 8 - 20© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Stopwatch Time Study Basic Steps1. Establish the standard job method
2. Break down the job into elements
3. Study the job
4. Rate the worker’s performance (RF)
5. Compute the average time ( t )
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 18Ch 8 - 21© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
6. Compute the normal timeNormal Time = (Elemental average) (rating factor)
Nt = ( t )(RF)
Normal Cycle Time = NT = Nt
7. Compute the standard timeStandard Time = (normal cycle time) (1 + allowance
factor)
ST = (NT) (1 + AF)
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 19Ch 8 - 25© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Incentive Piece-Rate Example
Piece-rate is $0.04 per sandwich What would average worker earn per hour?
Wage rate = (135)(0.04) = $5.40
600 445
134 8 135min
. min/.
sandwichor sandwiches
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 20Ch 8 - 27© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Number Of Cycles
nzseT
where
z
ix xn sample sta
2
2
1
z value for desired confidence level
s = ndard deviation
T = average job cycle time
e = degree of error from true mean
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 21Ch 8 - 28© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Number Of Cycles
nzseT
2 2
196 0 030 05 0 361
10 61 11( . )( . )
( . )( . ).
Average cycle time (without Rating Factor) =0.361
Computed standard deviation = 0.03 Company wants to be 95% confident that
computed time is within 5% of true average time
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 23
Work SamplingA technique for determining the
proportion of time a worker or machine spend on various activities
Involves brief, random observationsUseful for non-repetitive tasksE.g., secretary, nurse, police officer
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 24Ch 8 - 31© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Work Sampling - Basic Steps
1. Define the job activities
2. Determine number of observations desired
nze
p p
z
2
1
where
n = sample size
z value for desired confidence level
e = degree of error from true mean
p = proportion of time spent on activity prior to study
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 25Ch 8 - 32© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
3. Determine length of sampling period
4. Conduct work sampling study, record observations
5. Periodically re-compute number of observations
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 26Ch 8 - 36© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Learning Curve
Pro
cess
ing
time
per
unit
Units produced
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 27Ch 8 - 34© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Learning Curve
Processing time decreases with worker learning (experience)
Time per unit decreases by constant percentage each time output doubles
Useful for nonrepetitive, complex jobs requiring requiring long time to complete
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 28Ch 8 - 38© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Learning Curve For Mass Production Job
Standard time
End of improvementPro
cess
ing
time
per
unit
Units produced
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 29Ch 8 - 39© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
More On Learning Curves
Not effective for mass production jobsLittle relative improvement, in a brief
time spanProduct modifications negate effectsProductivity improvement can derive
from sources besides learning – such as?
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc 30Ch 8 - 35© 2000 by Prentice-Hall IncRussell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e
Computing Time For Nth Unit
tn = t1nb
where tn = time required for nth unit
t1 = time required for first unit n = cumulative number of units
produced b = ln r/ln 2, where r is the percentage
rate of improvement