What can social psychology teach us about (better) UX research?

  • Published on
    17-Jan-2017

  • View
    222

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Transcript

Accessibility

What can social psychology teach us about (better) UX research?

Jessica Cameron, PhD@jessscameron

1

2

3

apadivision45conference.com

4

prisonexp.org

5Social psychology is the scientific study of how people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviours are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others

6

(Iyengar & Lepper, 2000)

7

8

HELP SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT. You can show your respect for nature and help save the environment by reusing your towels during your stay.

JOIN YOUR FELLOW GUESTS IN HELPING TO SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT. Almost 75% of guests who are asked to participate in our new resource savings program do help by using their towels more than once. You can join your fellow guests in this program to help save the environment by reusing your towels during your stay.(Goldstein, Cialdini & Griskivecius, 2008)26%

9

Social proofScarcityReciprocitySocial proofScarcity

10

How can social psychology help us craft more effective user testing sessions?11

Social psychology research requires:Neutral environmentsScripted interactionsClear hypothesesRandom assignment to condition

huffingtonpost.com

The environmentNeutral yet comfortable

stanforddaily.com, confirmit.com

15

16

The interactionEvery word matters

18simplypsychology.org

1. Please continue.2. The experiment requires you to continue.3. It is absolutely essential that you continue.4. You have no other choice but to continue.

19

20

The hypothesisCool effects are not enough

22

The participantsRepresentative versus random

24

duke.edu

25

26

26

27

bluebottlecoffee.com

27

Does your test lab make all of your participants comfortable?What purpose is your banter serving?What purpose is your research serving?Do your participants really represent your users?

28

29How can social psychology help us understand what users have to say?

30How reliable are participants comments?a not veryb not at allc it dependsd all of the above

30

31

There is a mismatch between what people say and what they do

32bhs.co.uk

32

When asked directly about a possible effect of the position of the article, virtually all subjects denied it, usually with a worried glance at the interviewer suggesting that they felt either that they had misunderstood the question or were dealing with a madman.(Nisbett & Wilson, 1977)

33

How can you get more value out of what participants say?Reduce participants biasesReduce your own biases

34

Ask questions that minimise biasFraming effectAnchoring and adjustmentDunning-Kruger effectFundamental attribution error

35

Framing effectHow you ask the question matters

36

How easy did you find that website to use?How satisfied are you with the amount of information that you found?How likely are you to recommend this website?How amazing is this presentation?

37

How easy or difficult did you find that website to use?How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the amount of information that you found?How likely or unlikely are you to recommend this website?How amazing is this presentation?

38

Can we do better?

39

Tell me about what you found easy. Now tell me about what you found more difficult.Did you feel like the information you read answered your question?What would you tell a friend about this website?

40

Anchoring effectBiases can multiply

41

1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8

8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1

40,320

Dunning-Kruger effectYou dont know what you dont know

46

47

(Kruger & Dunning, 1999)

Fundamental attribution errorIt might be your fault

50

Is it the person or the situation?Are you the situation?

52

Thank you!Jessica Cameron@jessscameron