Upload
lrqa-slideshare
View
328
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
LRQA considers whether the introduction of a common language across standards by ISO, a key component of the pending updates to ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 (among others), could be the catalyst for change towards integrated management systems as standard practice.
Citation preview
Improving performance, reducing risk
ISO Standards Update - Integration as Standard?
A viewpoint from LRQA on the implications of the ISO Standards Revisions October 2013
Impact on Integrated Systems
LRQA knows only too well that organisations are looking for
increased efficiencies brought about
by operating a combined or
integrated management system and,
where appropriate, having this
certified in an integrated manner. David Lawson, LRQA Technical Director
July 2013
Benefits of Integration
• Integrated business understanding, planning and delivery
• ‘Joined-up’ thinking and action
• Consistent approach to managing business risks
• Less conflicting or diverging business strategies, goals or objectives
• Effective use of resource
• Promotion of best practice across organisational groups
• Reduced duplication producing cost savings
• Development of formal structures for informal systems
Things to Consider
• Extent or need for integration
• The cultural situation within the company
• Appetite for change
• The levels of competence necessary
• Legal and other regulatory requirements
• Clarity of the objectives for the integration project
Potential Issues to Overcome for Successful Integration
• Understanding of the commitment, drive and resources needed to integrate
• Understanding of the time required for change of established structures
and processes
• A structure or plan to manage the risks from change
• Buy in from management and lack of wider understanding
• Existing management system maturity or suitably embedded to provide
foundation
• The ability to manage and embrace change
• Need to understand the relationship with certification requirements
Integrated Management Systems A Case Study - Veolia UK
• 12,000 staff across 350 sites
• Certified to ISO 9001 (QMS), ISO 14001 (EMS)
and OHSAS 18001 (H&S)
• OHSAS used as the bedrock for integration
• For Veolia, integration has been made easier
with a shared policy and management review
process applicable to all three standards
What our clients say
Having the platform of the business
management system means that
additional requirements are relatively
straightforward to integrate. We simply
build on what already exists.
Peter Molloy
Environmental Management Systems Manager
Veolia UK
Integrated Management Systems A Case Study - BILT
• Ballarpur Industries Limited (BILT) is India’s largest manufacturer of writing and printing paper.
• Produced 248,560 MT of paper in FY012.
• Certified to ISO 9001 (QMS), ISO 14001 (EMS),
OHSAS 18001 (H&S) and ISO 50001 (EnMS).
• BILT Graphic Paper Products (Bhigwan) has
integrated all of their management systems to avoid the duplication of work and documentation and to
drive employee engagement, all of which results in increased competitive advantage as well as saving
on costs.
What our clients say
With each standard we implemented, starting with
QMS in 2000, we saw that our performance
increased. We found ourselves on a journey with
increasing levels of performance and results, from
quality to environmental, and health & safety, which
drove competitive advantage as well as employee
engagement and morale at work.” The fact that we
have third-party certification from LRQA helps to
improve BILT’s image in the market as being quality,
environment and safety conscious.
Dr Ashok Kumar, Vice President and the plant head at
BILT (Bhigwan)
Conclusions
• The proposed changes strengthen the opportunity to bring about improvements in organisational performance by:
• strengthening the strategic requirements e.g. Context and Leadership elements.
• linking to decisions about structure and the deployment of resource.
• the role of the Management Systems professional needing to work at the business and
“political level” within organisations an area not traditionally in their comfort zone.
• Managing risk through the system and should also be extended to the supply chain.
• The management culture of being in control can lead to assessing risk poorly and can add to the risks faced by organisations. Too much emphasis can be placed on risk avoidance and not
enough on planning for the consequences of failure. The exclusive use of the Probability v Impact matrix can lead to the exclusion of High Impact, Low Probability events from the
business continuity planning process.
Conclusions
• Organisational change needs to be managed through the management system but equally the system must reflect the organisational changes.
• Changes to the management system often lag organisational change creating a lack of clarity of responsibility and authority and exposing the organisation to risks to its regulatory compliance and certification.
• Integrating management systems can bring benefits but it needs to be carefully planned with a clear set of objectives. Many organisations opt for combining system elements rather than full integration.
www.linkedin.com/company/lrqa
Business Assurance from LRQA helps
you to manage your systems and risks
to improve and protect the current and
future performance of your organisation
Our unique assessment methodology
Lloyd’s Register and variants of it are trading names of Lloyd’s Register Group Limited, its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Copyright © Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Limited 2013. A member of the Lloyd’s Register group.
E [email protected] W www.lrqa.com/isostandardsupdate Twitter @LRQA_BA LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/company/lrqa LRQA Hiramford, Middlemarch Office Village, Siskin Drive, Coventry, CV3 4FJ
Improving performance, reducing risk