Upload
rick-heyland
View
180
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Process
Excellenceis a Superior Way
to Cost Excellence
Rick Heyland, Executive Vice President
Now that we have cut our budgets ….
Now what?
Of the companies that had undergone substantial layoffs
in a restructuring …
30% experienced an increase in costs
22% later realized that they had eliminated the wrong people
80% reported a collapse in employee morale
67% reported no immediate increase in productivity
and more than 50% show no short-term improvement in profits
Australian Newspaper, The AGE
In a review of 50 companies engaged in
cost cutting through layoffs: 43% suffered a
significant downturn in earnings after 3 years
These companies were Fortune 500
such as Kodak, Hershey, Unisys and others
Business Week, July 17, 2000
Genuine “cost-cutting” comes
through process excellence,
not simply cutting budgets.
Ron Moore, Making Common Sense Common Practice,
Fourth Edition: Models for Operational Excellence
Most companies
have good process
but not good process execution
RLG International
Visibility
Accountability
Granularity
Engagement
Challenge
Awareness
Principles for Process Excellence
Accountability and Visibility
Granularity – Sub KPIs
Granularity – AccountabilityTA 6-Aug
Total Work Instructions Due 1000
Planned Work Instructions Due 290
TOTAL # Work Instructions Received
Design Engineering Department 18
Electrical 0
Instrumentation and Electrical Design 0
Rotating Equipment Reliability 0
Instrumentation Reliability 0
Inspection 0
Operations 0
Maintenance 21
Total # Work Instructions Received 39
Total % Work Instructions Received 13.4%
Visibility – Boardwalk
Engineering Performance Improvement
The Problem
Canadian Heavy Oil:
At the TAR 3 Review in December 2014,
the 2015 TA was tracking:
• 38% over budget on cost
• 25% over budget on duration
Challenge and Engagement
• Over 500 attendees
at the 7 TMPs™ and
21 schedule quality
reviews
• Overall Line items
went from 7,000 to
12,000 in the
primavera schedule
• Identified over 550
discrete actions to
improve/strengthen
schedules
Challenge and Engagement –The Result
Turnaround CostCost Relative to Budget
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
-10% Execution
May 2015
TAR 3
Dec 2014
TAR 3
Dec 2014
Turnaround DurationDuration Relative to Plan
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Execution
May 2015
AwarenessRate Your Cost Excellence Culture
1
Senior
Management
2
Middle
Management
3
Front Line
Workers
4
Site
Contractors
1. Know your costs
2. Know your cost targets
3. Regular (monthly) updates on relevant cost actuals
4. Have clear strategies or actions to improve costs
5. Involved in a regular process to identify
cost improvements issues and solutions
(Lean Six Sigma)
AwarenessRate Your Cost Excellence Culture
1
Senior
Management
2
Middle
Management
3
Front Line
Workers
4
Site
Contractors
1. Know your costs
2. Know your cost targets
3. Regular (monthly) updates on relevant cost actuals
4. Have clear strategies or actions to improve costs
5. Involved in a regular process to identify
cost improvements issues and solutions
(Lean Six Sigma)
YES NO
“This gives me the information I need to
confidently schedule contractors without fear
of work being cancelled or budgets being
busted,” says the contractors supervisor.
“There needed to be a better way,” recalls the
Maintenance Superintendent, “we were always
looking in the rear-view mirror and surprised
when the numbers turned out so poorly.”
A Maintenance Cost Success Story“Bringing It All Together”
• Cost control was reactive, with review at period end
• A long history of cost overruns on increasing annual budgets
• A new approval Operating Rhythm™ was developed
• Timely data analysis
• Single point accountability
• Weekly cost forecasting
• Proactive approval process
(2)
-
2
4
6
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Mill
ion
s
YTD Maintenance Budget Variance
Start of RLG Project
AwarenessRate Your Cost Excellence Culture
1
Senior
Management
2
Middle
Management
3
Front Line
Workers
4
Site
Contractors
1. Know your costs
2. Know your cost targets
3. Regular (monthly) updates on relevant cost actuals
4. Have clear strategies or actions to improve costs
5. Involved in a regular process to identify
cost improvements issues and solutions
(Lean Six Sigma)
YES NO
Reactive Controlled Ownership Proactive
Urgency When a
Problem Arises Top Down Mandated Bottom Up Involvement
Top Down /
Bottom Up Sustainability
• Right sizing
• Chasing the independents
cost structure
• Using safety as an excuse
for extra costs
• Gold plating changes to
protect yourself
• Top down decisions to cut
costs
• Clear rules on cost controls
• Decisions on cost control
flow up
• Rule-based culture
• Management tells them the
cost score
• Front line knows the cost
score on a regular basis
• Cost targets by team are
clear, visible and discussed
• Front line ideas for
improvement are
encouraged
• Front line cross functional
cost teams are developed
and effective
• Safety, productivity and cost
control are guiding principles
that guide everybody at work
• Contractors are involved and
engaged on cost reduction
ideas
• Full engagement from senior
management and front line
on cost improvement
strategies and actions
Culture Progression Curve
Cost Excellence Journey
Visibility
Accountability
Granularity
Engagement
Challenge
Awareness
Principles for Process Excellence