Upload
fvcaa
View
422
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Ed Kroft, Q.C. - Settling Tax Disputes for the Fraser Valley CA Association Conference Day Nov 7, 2013
Citation preview
50872094
FRASER VALLEY CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION
SETTLING TAX DISPUTES
ED KROFT, Q.C.BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDON LLP
November 7, 2013
1
50872094
Settling Tax Cases
· Clients always want to know about prospects of settling tax controversies
· Settlement is an art – there is no one formula for success
· Many factors affect the methodology, content and timing of a settlement and the strategy associated with it
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
2
50872094
Settling Tax Cases
· Tax statutes do not fully outline the methodology of how to settle disputes – they refer to procedural rules relating to the powers of the Minister to reassess and waivers of objection and appeal rights (ITA 169(3), 164(4.1), 165(1.2), 165(3), 165(5), 165(1.2), 169(2.2), 152(4.2), 152(4.3), 220(3.1))
· Parties only rely on these rules to effect a resolution of a dispute
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
3
50872094
· There are many “tools” that may assist with facilitating a settlement
· First and foremost, the key to crafting and obtaining a successful settlement requires clarity regarding what a “win” is for each party to the controversy
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
4
50872094
· To get to this place, realism is required and the timetable may be longer than one of the parties might expect – so patience is critical to success
· “Maximizing” a settlement will differ in every case. “Win” will look different to different people
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
5
50872094
What Might Be Considered A “Win”?
Some Elements· What is a “win” for the taxpayer? What is a “win” for the
tax authority?
· What is at stake for the taxpayer? Money, principle, time, political capital, someone’s job, certainty, public scrutiny?
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
6
50872094
What Might Be Considered A “Win”?
Some Elements· What is at stake for the tax authority? The same things
· Money: Nothing owing or some amount? (Both sides)
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
7
50872094
What Might Be Considered A “Win”?
Some Elements· Court proceedings or not? (time, money) – Both
sides
· Lengthy process or not? (time, someone’s job) – Both sides
· Availability of personnel to work on the tax controversy? (time, political capital) – Both sides
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
8
50872094
What Might Be Considered A “Win”?
Some Elements· Costly process or not and the need to hire people?
(money) – Both sides
· Reputational risk or not? (someone’s job, money) – Both sides
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
9
50872094
What Might Be Considered A “Win”?
Some Elements· Certainty for future years or not? (principle, someone’s
job) – Both sides
· Consistency with published practices/precedent (principle) – Tax authorities
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
10
50872094
What Might Be Considered A “Win”?
Some Elements· Are amounts owing to tax authorities creditable
elsewhere? Has full provision been made on financial statements? (Does “winning” really matter?) – Taxpayer (Bonus allocations)
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
11
50872094
What Might Be Considered A “Win”?
Some Elements· Overall: Formulation of a “maximum amount you can live
with” will help to determine the strategy and the tools needed to obtain the result – This analysis is done consciously or unconsciously, rationally or irrationally, by both sides. The answer is fluid and can change at different times because the relative importance of the elements will change.
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
12
50872094
· “Maximizing” and “winning” therefore are not always about just money
· How can you “maximize” a settlement?– Understand what factors and issues affect your settlement
prospects– Understand that factual, legal, practical and strategic factors
lead to or prevent settlement
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
13
50872094
Settlement Factors· The following is a checklist of factors which play a role
within the settlement process:1. Costs of litigation/dispute resolution (professional costs and
opportunity costs)2. Stress and distraction of litigation/dispute resolution (loss of
time)
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
14
50872094
Settlement Factors3. The expected benefits of winning (present and
future)• The chances/magnitude of winning (based on an analysis
of the facts, evidence, law, and business issues)• The personality, approach, bias and experience of persons
acting for/on behalf of the taxpayer
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
15
50872094
Settlement Factors4. The personality, approach, bias and experience of
persons acting for the Crown:• CRA (audit, appeals, designated appeals)· Department of Justice lawyers
5. The nature of the dispute• Technical (legal interpretation)• Factual• Judgmental (e.g. quantum, valuation)• Is it an “all or nothing” type of issue?• Does the matter lend itself to a compromise? (e.g.
valuation, expenses)
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
16
50872094
Settlement Factors
6. The personality, approach, bias and experience of judges
7. The need to meet deadlines· By the taxpayer (to provide information/documents,
limitation periods, procedural limitations)
· By CRA (limitation periods, internal constraints, procedural limitations)
8. Publicity of the dispute and reputational risk
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
17
50872094
Settlement Factors9. Nature and tone of the communications between
the tax authority and the taxpayer (meetings, telephone calls, written responses)
10.Personal/corporate profile of the taxpayer (education, sophistication, experience, wealth)
11. The necessity of technical compliance with applicable tax legislation
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
18
50872094
Settlement Factors12.The prospect of accountability
– by the taxpayer (to shareholders, to lenders, to competitors, to the public)
– by the tax authority (internally, to the Auditor-General, to the public)
13.Possible taxpayer mistakes (lack of courtesy/respect, inconsistent stories, lack of interest, absence of proof/evidence, non-compliance with procedural or substantive requirements)
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
19
50872094
Settlement Factors14.Possible CRA mistakes (missing statute-
barred deadlines)
15.The effluxion of time and the age of the dispute (battle fatigue, maturing perspectives)
16.The need for a “principled” or legal settlement
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
20
50872094
Legal Basis for Settlement· The necessity for a legal basis of settlement: can you
compromise?
· Can a Taxpayer or CRA repudiate a settlement?
Settlement Strategies
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
21
50872094
Legal Basis for Settlement· Jurisprudence
– Cohen, Smerchanski, Galway, Enterac, Garber– 1390758 Ontario– Huppe– CIBC World Markets– Potash Corporation– Hine– McKenzie– Transalta– Softsim
Settlement Strategies
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
22
50872094
“Maximizing”Based on the previous list of factors and the particular “maximization” in the circumstances, how can you “maximize” a settlement?· Understand your adversary and their position· Establish and maintain credibility and integrity with your
adversary – trust creates the environment for a deal or it has to be mediated by a judge or foreign government
· Understand and anticipate what implications a settlement will have
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
23
50872094
“Maximizing”· Stick within risk tolerance and expectation· Determine when to settle· Identify who has the authority to settle· Be creative and assume nothing is impossible· Be prepared to litigate
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
24
50872094
Tools in the Settlement Toolbox· Commitment to “win”
· Preparation
· Good relationships with tax authorities - trust
· Effective documentation retention and recovery
· Ability to listen well and other “soft” skills – it’s a “people” process and not a robotic one
· Knowledge of your case and the facts
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
25
50872094
Tools in the Settlement Toolbox· Ability to secure witnesses including those who
are no longer in organizations
· Knowledge of the prevailing law and sensitivity to movements in judicial trends
· Knowledge of how to create a “legal” and “principled” settlement
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
26
50872094
Tools in the Settlement Toolbox· Knowledge of court process and proper forum
for dispute– Tax Court (settlement conference, case
management, costs, motions)– Federal Court (judicial review of ministerial action
including challenge to compellability of documents)– Provincial Court/Superior Court (privilege,
rectification, provincial assessment)
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
27
50872094
Tools in the Settlement Toolbox· Knowledge of tax authority administrative practice and
personnel– Taxpayer relief provisions– Real time audits– Structure of the tax authority and its mechanics
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
28
50872094
Tools in the Settlement Toolbox· Knowledge of remedies available to facilitate
the settlement– Administrative (waiver of interest and penalties)– Judicial (tax court hearing/motion)– Statutory (court, remission order)
· Patience – when should a settlement be rejected? Knowing when to hold or fold
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
29
50872094
· What are the possible effects of the settlement?– Certainty for past– Reduction of tax, interest, penalties– Elimination of reputational risk, cost savings, better deployment
of corporate resources
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
30
50872094
· When can you settle?– Anytime (audit, appeal, court)– At the Tax Court level
• After pleadings• After Discovery process• Settlement Conference• Pre-trial Conference• Just before Trial
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
31
50872094
· How do you settle?– “Without Prejudice” written offers
• Indefinite or limited?• Non-disclosure?• Costs? Do you need a “compromise” position to get
enhanced costs or can you get such costs in an “all or nothing” situation? (Blackburn Radio 2013)
• Trial balloons?– Oral communications – are they useful?
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
32
50872094
· How do you settle?– Waiver of objection/appeal rights – tough to reverse (Noran
West, 2012 TCC)– Within the Tax Court process
• Consent to Judgment (public)• Subsection 169(3) of the ITA• Minutes of Settlement (not public)
Settling Tax Cases
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
33
50872094
Questions
KROFT/NOVEMBER 2013
34