Why Do Some Students Become More Engaged in Collaborative Wiki Writing?

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Why Do Some Students Become More Engaged in Collaborative Wiki Writing?. Wilson W.T. Law Ronnel B. King Michele Notari (Speaker) Eddie W.L. Cheng Samuel K.W. Chu. - The Role of Sense of Relatedness. Take home. The higher the sense of relatedness.. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

WHY DO SOME STUDENTS BECOME MORE ENGAGED IN COLLABORATIVE WIKI WRITING?- The Role of Sense of Relatedness

Wilson W.T. LawRonnel B. KingMichele Notari (Speaker)Eddie W.L. ChengSamuel K.W. Chu

TAKE HOME

The higher the sense of relatedness..

The more engagement of a learner in collaborative writing...

The better is his/her learning outcome?

3

WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?

SENSE OF RELATEDNESS?

5

6

CRITICISM AROUND THE USE OF WIKIS

7

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Objective: Linking Sense of Relatedness and Engagement in Wiki

8

RQ 1

To what extent does sense of relatedness predict students’ behavioral engagement in collaborative wiki writing?

9

RQ 2

To what extent does sense of relatedness predict students’ emotional engagement in collaborative wiki writing?

10

RQ 3

To what extent does sense of relatedness predict students’ cognitive engagement in collaborative wiki writing?

11

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH SETTINGS

12

PARTICIPANTS

13

THE PROJECT

14

PREPARING THE TEACHER

15

THE PBWORKS (WIKI) ENVIRONMENT

16

THE PBWORKS (WIKI) ENVIRONMENT

17

THE PBWORKS (WIKI) ENVIRONMENT

18

19

PROCEDURES AND MEASURES

20

QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Behavioral engagement2. Emotional engagement3. Cognitive engagement4. Sense of relatedness to teacher5. Sense of relatedness to peers

21

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

Factor No. of items α Mean SD

Behavioral Engagement 5 .82 3.63 0.58

Emotional Engagement 5 .84 3.59 0.59

Cognitive Engagement 5 .79 3.38 0.59

Sense of Relatedness to Teacher 4 .60 3.60 0.59

Sense of Relatedness to Peers 4 .64 3.73 0.63

22

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

Factor No. of items α Mean SD

Behavioral Engagement 5 .82 3.63 0.58

Emotional Engagement 5 .84 3.59 0.59

Cognitive Engagement 5 .79 3.38 0.59

Sense of Relatedness to Teacher 4 .60 3.60 0.59

Sense of Relatedness to Peers 4 .64 3.73 0.63

23

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

Factor No. of items α Mean SD

Behavioral Engagement 5 .82 3.63 0.58

Emotional Engagement 5 .84 3.59 0.59

Cognitive Engagement 5 .79 3.38 0.59

Sense of Relatedness to Teacher 4 .60 3.60 0.59

Sense of Relatedness to Peers 4 .64 3.73 0.63

24

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

Factor No. of items α Mean SD

Behavioral Engagement 5 .82 3.63 0.58

Emotional Engagement 5 .84 3.59 0.59

Cognitive Engagement 5 .79 3.38 0.59

Sense of Relatedness to Teacher 4 .60 3.60 0.59

Sense of Relatedness to Peers 4 .64 3.73 0.63

25

ANALYSIS RESULTS

26

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS RESULTS

Correlations among the five factors:

  Variable 1 2 3 4 5

1 Behavioral Engagement -        

2 Emotional Engagement .792** -      

3 Cognitive Engagement .714** .756** -    

4Sense of Relatedness to Teacher

.381** .339** .246** -  

5Sense of Relatedness to Peers

.320** .277** .202** .602** -

Note: **p < .01

27

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS RESULTS

Correlations among the five factors:

  Variable 1 2 3 4 5

1 Behavioral Engagement -        

2 Emotional Engagement .792** -      

3 Cognitive Engagement .714** .756** -    

4Sense of Relatedness to Teacher

.381** .339** .246** -  

5Sense of Relatedness to Peers

.320** .277** .202** .602** -

Note: **p < .01

28

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS RESULTS

Correlations among the five factors:

  Variable 1 2 3 4 5

1 Behavioral Engagement -        

2 Emotional Engagement .792** -      

3 Cognitive Engagement .714** .756** -    

4Sense of Relatedness to Teacher

.381** .339** .246** -  

5Sense of Relatedness to Peers

.320** .277** .202** .602** -

Note: **p < .01

29

BEHAVIORAL ENGAGEMENT

RQ1

Sense of relatedness to

teachers

Sense of relatedness to

peers

Behavioral Engagement

.296 (p < .001)

.143 (p < .05)

30

EMOTIONAL ENGAGEMENT

RQ2:

Sense of relatedness to

teachers

Sense of relatedness to

peers

Emotional Engagement

.270 (p < .001)

.116 (p < .05)

31

COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT

RQ3:

Sense of relatedness to

teachers

Sense of relatedness to

peers

Cognitive Engagement

.195 (p < .001)

.085 (not significant)

32

SUMMARIZED REGRESSION RESULTS

  Behavioral Engagement

(β)

Emotional Engagement

(β)

Cognitive Engagement

(β)

Sense of Relatedness to Teacher

.296*** .270*** .195***

Sense of Relatedness to Peers

.143* .116* .085

Total R2 .159*** .124*** .065****p < .05, **p < .01, ***p

< .001

33

LIMITATIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

34

WHAT RESEARCHERS CAN LEARN FROM IT?

35

WHAT TEACHERS CAN LEARN FROM IT?

36

WHAT SCHOOLS CAN LEARN FROM IT?

37

Q&A SESSION

38

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Recommended