What is science? Science is our effort to understand the world around us, using observable physical...
Preview:
Citation preview
- Slide 1
- What is science? Science is our effort to understand the world
around us, using observable physical evidence. Science is done
through observation and experimentation
- Slide 2
- What is ecology? Simple answer: the study of how organisms
interact with each other and their environment Long answer: Ecology
is the scientific study of the processes regulating the
distribution and abundance of organisms and the interactions among
them, and the study of how these organisms in turn mediate the
transport and transformation of energy and matter in the biosphere
(i.e., the study of the design of ecosystem structure and
function). (Krebs 1972)
- Slide 3
- What is ecology? Ecology is by nature multi-disciplinary
Evolution Physiology Chemistry Behavior Genetics Geology Physics
Hydrology
- Slide 4
- moss grows on north side of trees You notice: Why?????
- Slide 5
- Pattern Process moss grows on north side of trees microclimate
is cooler on north side and more favorable to moss
- Slide 6
- deer live in groups You notice: Why?????
- Slide 7
- Pattern Process deer live in groups reduces susceptibility to
predation Alternative hypothesis OR groups to more easily find
mate
- Slide 8
- Science is detecting interesting patterns and askingWHY?????
Pattern Process Non-random outcome or event that begs an
explanation Mechanism causing a natural pattern
- Slide 9
- Or the Popperian method (after Karl Popper) There is an ongoing
debate though, on how science should be done Philosophy of science
This method of scientific inquiry called
- Slide 10
- What is a
- Slide 11
- HYPOTHESIS Reasonable explanation Testable statement Asks how?
or why? Usually an if / then statement
- Slide 12
- Challenge statement: You can prove a hypothesis true. Agree or
disagree? Why?
- Slide 13
- Case study Betholdia trigona (tiger moth) emits a particularly
dense series of ultrasonic clicks Eptesicus fuscus (big brown bat)
eats tiger moths. Finds using sonar. From Corcoran et al. Science
2009 You know:
- Slide 14
- Hypothesis 1: are blocking the sonar of have a warning effect
on From Corcoran et al. Science 2009 Hypothesis 2 (or alternative
hypothesis): (telling them they taste bad) How can you test
this???????
- Slide 15
- If moths are blocking sonar, nave bats should startle and stop
attack. Wont affect subsequent attack. If moths have a warning
effect (say they taste bad), then nave bats should complete attack
but not attack again From Corcoran et al. Science 2009 Hypothesis
1: Hypothesis 2 (or alternative hypothesis): As an if / then
statement: Now its testable
- Slide 16
- Experiment Silence some moths Leave some alone Tether moths and
watch how bats react when attack From Corcoran et al. Science
2009
- Slide 17
- Results Stopped attack on normal moths, but didnt avoid moths
in future Bats caught silenced moths From Corcoran et al. Science
2009 How can you interpret????
- Slide 18
- Interpretation Alternative hypothesis of being distasteful and
giving a warning is disproven Moths are obstructing the bats sonar,
allowing them to escape being eaten From Corcoran et al. Science
2009
- Slide 19
- Back to hypothetico-deductive approach Formulates a hypothesis
from observation then tries to nullify alternatives Never really
proves the hypothesis, just disproves the alternatives Eliminates
alternatives within a certain degree of error
- Slide 20
- Observation Argentine ants are successful invaders of native
California ant habitats Jeanna Bryner
- Slide 21
- Hypothesis Argentine ants dont fight amongst themselves, but do
fight with other species (observation) Hypothesis: if / then If
Argentine ants are more genetically similar, they will fight more
with native species than with their own Alternative hypothesis If
predators prefer native species but dont eat Argentine ants, native
species will suffer reduced populations relative to Argentine
ants
- Slide 22
- Experiment Check genetic similarity between native species and
Argentine ants and among themselves Feeding experiments which
species do predators prefer BUT, even if predators prefer the
natives, does that affect their population numbers? Hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis
- Slide 23
- Results Hypothesis: Alternative hypothesis Argentine ants are
very similar genetically to other Argentine ant nests the same is
not true of native ants Predators prefer native ants, but predation
is probably less important in structuring community than
competition
- Slide 24
- Interpretation Argentine ants represent a supercolony
individuals from nearby nests recognize each other as siblings
rather than intraspecific competitors.
- Slide 25
- Tools Statistics are a tool scientists use to see patterns and
test hypotheses.
- Slide 26
- Average trait All individuals There is considerable variation
in traits among individuals of the same species
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Wing length (mm) Correlation between spot length and wing
length of Anopheles darlingi from the Amazon (open circles) and
Mato Grosso (closed circles) From Charlwood 1996 What does each
point represent?
- Slide 29
- Variation Biological variability: differences in individuals
Mean The average. But its also important how much the data vary
around the mean 55555 71539 average 5 5 0 10 variance
- Slide 30
- CONTROL GROUPEXPERIMENTAL GROUP normalThe altered group No
special conditionsabnormal Reference point With special condition
youre interested in Plants in field Plants with added nitrogen
Number of seeds per plant Grow plants with other plants and count
seeds
- Slide 31
- Independent variable Difference between control and
experimental groups Factor being tested Can be different levels
(e.g. different time points, different amount of nutrients
Sometimes call treatment Cause Dependent variable Factor assume
will be affected Factor being measured Factor that depends on the
treatment e.g. Plant growth, seed production, number of offspring,
growth rate Effect
- Slide 32
- Scatter plot The scatter plot shows the hours of study and test
scores of 20 students As the number of hours of study increases,
the marks scored tend to increase So, the scatter plot describes a
positive trend
- Slide 33
- Independent variable Dependent variable Positive
correlation
- Slide 34
- Independent variable Dependent variable Negative
correlation
- Slide 35
- Independent variable Dependent variable No correlation
- Slide 36
- Scatter plot
- Slide 37
- Scatter plot with error bars
- Slide 38
- Controls Experiments that are testing a treatment should also
have a control with the exact same conditions as the treatments,
without the treatment. Hypothesis: If nitrogen is a limiting
nutrient for a certain plant community, then adding nitrogen will
lead to increased growth of the plants in the community. Add N
Control Add NControl Add NControl Add N
- Slide 39
- Hypothesis: If nitrogen is a limiting nutrient for a certain
plant community, then adding nitrogen will lead to increased growth
of the plants in the community. What would the results graph look
like??? Independent variable? Amount of Nitrogen added Dependent
variable? Measure of plant growth
- Slide 40
- Kinds of data Discrete Continuous Also called categorical Data
have clear beginning and end e.g. Food in a diet (seed, plant,
animal) Usually a measurement Usually numeric data e.g. the number
of seeds per plant or dry weight of a plant
- Slide 41
- Visual representations DiscreteContinuous Histogram, Frequency
distribution Bar graph Scatter plot
- Slide 42
- Histogram
- Slide 43
- Challenge statement Correlation implies causation
- Slide 44
- Slide 45
- Correlation and Causation Pattern Correlation Describes the
relationship between two variables Process Causation Describes
cause and effect
- Slide 46
- Case study Read the article: Want a Higher G.P.A.? Go to a
Private College by C. Rampell, printed in the NY Times 1.What are
the variables being compared (look at the title of the article)
2.Which is the dependent variable? The independent variable? 3.Does
the headline indicate correlation or causation between the two
variables? 4.Study claims following causal relationships: Students
at private schools started receiving significantly higher grades
than equally qualified students (based on SAT scores) in public
schools around the 1950s All schools inflate grades, but private
schools inflate more Admissions officers at top medical, business
and law schools and some PhD. programs are fooled by private school
students inflated grades Lower grades in the sciences discourage
American students from studying such disciplines Which, if any,
claim is supported by the study? Explain.
- Slide 47
- Correlation and Causation Sudden Oak Death (SODS) First
observed in the mid-1990s in Marin County On a slope near Mt.
Tamalpais, facing SF Bay, where cool, moist fog bathes the
hillsides
- Slide 48
- Correlation and Causation Hikers noticed several clusters of
tan oaks had turned brown and died Tan oak (Lithocarpus
densiflorus), not a true oak, but a close relative Arborists also
reported dying tan oaks elsewhere with unusually large swarms of
three common bark beetles on he trunks, attracted to cankers
- Slide 49
- Sudden Oak Death All trees that were sick or died had a beetle
infestation These beetles were known to burrow and tunnel in trunks
of dead trees to nest and reproduce
- Slide 50
- Sudden Oak Death Pathogen in Dutch elm epidemic was transmitted
by insects, so assumed that they played the same role in this
disease Fungus transmitted by elm bark beetle
- Slide 51
- Sudden Oak Death Because of testing of alternatives, we now
know that its Phytophthora ramorum, in genus of Oomycetes (water
molds), like a fungus Hypothesis: beetles were transmitting the
pathogen causing SODS Many trees had large weeping cankers, swarms
of beetles and green to black fruiting bodies of Hypoxylon fungus
This fungus is believed to be in the tree when it is healthy, and
to break out and grow in areas of sapwood that die
- Slide 52
- What is a Scientific theory?
- Slide 53
- What is a theory? THEORY Offers a tested mechanism for this
phenomena A phenomena based on a group of observations Close to a
scientific law Derived from work of multiple scientists
- Slide 54
- Ecology is hierarchical Different levels of organization
(scale): Landscape Ecosystem Community Population Individual
Scale
- Slide 55
- Hierarchies in ecology 1.How do individuals affect and are
affected by the environment? 2.How are individuals adapted to the
environment? 3.How does an individual make a living? 4.What are the
limiting factors for an individuals reproduction and growth?
Individual
- Slide 56
- Hierarchies in ecology 1.What causes the presence or absence of
a particular species? 2.What do we know about the species abundance
or rarity? 3.Are there trends and fluctuations in their numbers?
4.What are their characteristics? Life histories Genetics
Competition among each other Population
- Slide 57
- Hierarchies in ecology 1.What structures communities? 2.What
can we say about interactions among species? Predation Competition
Parasitism Mutualism Community
- Slide 58
- Hierarchies in ecology 1. How does energy and nutrients move
through ecosystems? 2.How does this flux influence species?
Ecosystem
- Slide 59
- Hierarchies in ecology 1.How does energy and nutrients flow
between ecosystems? 2.How are ecosystems connected? 3.What
determines the presence and absence of species on a large scale?
Landscape
- Slide 60
- Kinds of ecological studies Observational Comparative
Theoretical Experimental Observe natural phenomena No experiments
or manipulations Manipulate a microcosm Isolate a portion, limit
factors, manipulate conditions May be based on data (or not) e.g.
mathematical models that describe ecosystem interactions From
literature and / or previously collected data Meta-analysis
- Slide 61
- Reading literature 1.What is the problem? 2.What is the
hypothesis of the researchers? 3.What are the alternative
hypotheses? 4.How did they gather evidence? 5.Does the evidence
support the hypothesis? 6.How does this fit in with the larger
issues in ecology?