View
10
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
14 July 2020 Environment Court Auckland Registry Attention: Trent Grace by email Dear Trent Whangarei District Plan Changes – Urban and Services – Notice of Appeal
1. I act for Quality Development Limited (QDL), a submitter on the Proposed District Plan
Changes.
2. I attach for filing a Notice of Appeal on behalf of QDL.
3. I advise:
(a) The filing fee will be paid via electronic transfer this afternoon;
(b) The Respondent Council has been served a copy of the Notice of Appeal;
(c) The Registry will be updated when the list of parties to be served have received a copy of the Notice of Appeal;
(d) That an original hardcopy of the Notice of Appeal will not be provided, given the Environment Court’s blanket waiver on the filing of originals.
Yours faithfully
Jeremy Brabant CC. Reyburn & Bryant (emma@reyburnandbryant.co.nz) Whangarei District Council (Melissa.McGrath@wdc.govt.nz).
Vulcan Building Chambers
Level 4, Vulcan Buildings Cnr Vulcan Lane & Queen St, Auckland PO Box 1502 Shortland St Auckland, New Zealand M. 021 494 506 E. jeremy@brabant.co.nz
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-
I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA
In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act)
And
In the Matter of an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act with respect to decisions on the Proposed Regional Plan for Northland
Between Quality Developments Limited
Appellant
And Whangarei District Council
Respondent
Notice of Appeal Against Decision on Proposed Whangarei District Plan Changes 88, 88I and 148 and Proposed Planning Map 72 on behalf of Quality
Developments Limited
Dated 14 July 2020
Jeremy Brabant
Barrister
Level 4, Vulcan Building Chambers
PO Box 1502, Shortland St
Auckland City
021 494 506
Email: jeremy@brabant.co.nz
1
To The Registrar
Environment Court
Auckland
1. Quality Developments Limited (QDL) appeals part of a decision of Whangarei
District Council (Council) on the Whangarei District Proposed Urban Plan
Changes and Proposed District-Wide Plan Changes (Proposed Plan).
2. QDL are the registered owners of land at O’Shea Road, Maunu comprised in
titles Lot 2 DP 46220 and Pt Lot 4 DP 19724 (Site).
3. QDL made a submission on the Proposed Plan.
4. QDL is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the
Resource Management Act 1991.
5. QDL received notice of the decision on 3 June 2020.
6. The decision was made by Whangarei District Council.
7. The part of the decision QDL appeals is:
The decision of Council to reject relief sought by QDL in its submission to:
a. Rezone Lot 2 DP 46220 and the identified area of Pt Lot 4 DP 19724
Low Density Residential Zone (LDR); and
b. Make consequential amendments to Proposed Plan changes 82A,
82B, 88, 88A-J, 109, 115, 136, 147 and 148 where those provisions
are inconsistent with QDL’s submission.
Grounds of Appeal
8. The decision to decline the relief sought in QDL’s submission:
a. Fails to promote the sustainable management of the natural and
physical resources of the Council’s district and does not achieve the
purpose of the Act;
2
b. Is contrary to Part 2 and other provisions of the Act; and
c. Does not provide for the reasonably foreseeable needs for future
generations.
9. Adoption of the relief sought by QDL would be appropriate because:
a. It would assist Council to carry out its functions so as to achieve the
purpose of the Act;
b. It would give effect to the relevant higher order documents; and
c. The amendments sought by QDL promote the sustainable
management of the natural and physical resources of the region and
does not offend any matters of importance in sections 6, 7 and 8 of
the Act.
10. Without limiting the generality of the grounds set out in paragraph 8 above,
QDL’s additional grounds for appeal include:
“Limited Progress” in Achieving Residential Zone Outcomes
a. The Commissioners were incorrect to effectively assign weight to
the proposition that limited progress of residential development on
the Site under existing live zonings is relevant to determination of
the Site’s most appropriate zoning as:
i. The RMA is a permissive statute, landowners are not
required to “giv[e] effect to the zoning”1 within any
particular time frame or develop land to the relevant zone’s
full potential;
ii. The Site’s current undeveloped state is not determinative of
the zoning which should properly be applied.
1 Section 32 report, pg 128.
3
No Evidence to Support Rural Production Zoning (RPZ)
b. No evidence was put before the Commissioners to demonstrate the
Site has rural production potential or is properly regarded as
possessing rural production characteristics. The decision to rezone
the site RPZ was made on the basis that the Site is “more closely
connected to, and associated with, the surrounding rural catchment, rather than
the nearby residential catchment.”2 That conclusion:
i. Was founded on an incorrect contextual assessment of the
Site’s location, surrounding land use and zoning, historic
structure plans and current access arrangements;
ii. Does not appear to have been informed by any expert
evidence as to soil capacity or the site’s ability to be utilised
for productive rural activities; and
iii. Does not represent the most effective and efficient use of
the Site relative to the status quo and the RPZ having
considered the requirements of s 32.
Overlooks Consistency with LDR Zoning Criteria
c. There is no clear assessment of the Site against Council’s proposed
RPZ zoning criteria, despite the conclusion that the competing land
zonings are “finely balanced.”
d. QDL’s proposed rezoning is generally consistent with Council’s
criteria used to determine the appropriateness of the Proposed LDR
zone.3
2 Council Right of Reply, pg 24.
3 Section 32 Report, Table 24.
4
Risk of Hazards – Not Determinative
e. The risk of land instability should not be determinative of zoning, in
the context of the risk which applies to the Site:
i. QDL’s proposed LDR zoning provides for a low-level of
residential development which is an appropriate response
to potential hazard risk and management;
ii. Issues relating to land stability in relation to future
development and land use are appropriately considered in
the context of an application for resource consent;
iii. Potential site constraints including archaeological sites,
Northpower CEL, Kotuku Dam and National Grid line and
towers can be responded to appropriately by the LDR zone;
and
iv. An adjoining site to the east4 of the Site has retained its
residential zoning while also being located in a high
instability area.5 The retention of the zoning for that land is
supported by Council, notwithstanding hazard risk. A
decision to support the residential zoning of that site shows
an inconsistency in Council’s approach to hazard
management in the LDR zone.
11. QDL seeks the following relief:
a. That the decisions to decline the relief sought by QDL be cancelled;
b. That the relief sought in QDL’s submission on the Proposed Plan be
accepted;
4 Lot 1 DP 177316.
5 Urban and Services Plan Change Decision Map online version.
5
c. Any other similar, consequential or other relief as is necessary to
address the issues raised in QDL’s appeal; and
d. Costs.
12. The following documents are attached to this notice:
a. A copy of QDL submission on the Proposed Plan (Attachment A);
b. A copy of the relevant decision (Attachment B);
c. A list of names and addresses of persons to be served with a copy
of this notice (Attachment C).
Signature: Quality Developments Limited by its
authorised agent:
Jeremy Brabant
Date: 14 July 2020
Address for service: Jeremy Brabant
Level 4, Vulcan Building Chambers
Cnr Queen Street and Vulcan Lane
PO Box 1502, Shortland St
Auckland
Mobile: 021 494 506
Email: jeremy@brabant.co.nz
6
Advice to recipients of copy of notice of appeal
How to become party to proceedings
You may be a party to the appeal if you made a submission or a further submission
on the matter of this appeal.
To become a party to the appeal, you must,—
• within 15 working days after the period for lodging a notice of appeal ends, lodge
a notice of your wish to be a party to the proceedings (in form 33) with the
Environment Court and serve copies of your notice on the relevant local
authority and the appellant; and
• within 20 working days after the period for lodging a notice of appeal ends, serve
copies of your notice on all other parties.
Your right to be a party to the proceedings in the court may be limited by the trade
competition provisions in section 274(1) and Part 11A of the Resource Management
Act 1991.
You may apply to the Environment Court under section 281 of the Resource
Management Act 1991 for a waiver of the above timing or service requirements (see
form 38).
Advice
If you have any questions about this notice, contact the Environment Court in
Auckland.
Attachment A
A copy of QDL’s submission on the Proposed Plan
www.reyburnandbryant.co.nz
To: Policy Department – Attention: Policy and Monitoring Department
Whangarei District Council
Private Bag 9023
Whangarei 0148
Email: mailroom@wdc.govt.nz
RE: Submission on Plan Changes 88, 88I & 148, and Proposed Planning Map 72
1. Details of persons making submission
Quality Developments Ltd (QDL)
Ref: 15597
C/- Reyburn and Bryant
Attention: Emma Miller
PO Box 191
WHANGAREI
2. General statement
QDL cannot gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission. They
are directly affected by the plan changes. The effects are not related to trade
competition.
3. Background and context
Site description
QDL are the registered owners of land contained in two certificates of title as follows:
NA1637/9 – Lot 2 DP 46220 – 22.3587ha; and
NA478/206.- Pt Lot 4 DP 19724 – 24.6150ha
Both the above titles are located at O’Shea Road, Maunu. A plan showing the location
of the land is provided at Figure 1. A copy of the certificate of titles is attached at
Attachment 1.
The land is located to the south of State Highway 14, some 5km to the west of the
Whangarei CBD. Historically QDL owned and adjoining property to the north east
that has since been purchased by the Northland Regional Council and developed as
the Kotuku Dam. An area of Pt Lot 4 DP 19724 is temporarily affected when the
Kotuku Dam is in use. The affected area is identified as Designation DNRC2 on the
WDC district planning maps and is also subject to a right to detain and drain
www.reyburnandbryant.co.nz
stormwater easement over areas A & B as shown on SO 467829 for the benefit of the
Northland Regional Council.
Access to the subject land is from State Highway 14 via Pompallier Estate Drive and
O’Shea Road. For all intents and purposes Pt Lot 4 DP 19724 is landlocked as it has no
direct frontage to legal road. Historically access was also available via Kotuku Street,
however this access has been severed by the construction of the Kotuku Dam.
Lot 2 DP 46220 is bound by the Nihotetea Stream on the northern boundary. To the
west are a number of lifestyle blocks that range in size between 1.2 and 6.5ha and to
the south is a large 78ha property that is accessed via Raumaunga Heights Drive and
Tauro Street.
Pt Lot 4 DP 19724 is separated into two parcels by the alignment of the Nihotetea
Stream. On the northern side of the stream there is an area of approximately
8,000m². This land is bush clad and slopes steeply from the neighbouring residential
sites, that gain access of Rosella Place down to the stream. There is no formal access
to this part of the site. To the east and west are Scenic Reserves owned by the WDC.
This area of land is steep and covered in mature bush.
On the southern side of the Nihotetea Stream is the bulk of the land comprising of Pt
Lot 4 DP 194724. To the west of this parcel is the Kotuku Dam and south is the large
Raumaunga block.
Figure 1: Site location (Source: WDC GIS)
www.reyburnandbryant.co.nz
There are no residential buildings on the site. The topography of the site general
comprises of two ridgelines running in a south to north direction from a main central
ridge near the end of O’Shea Road. The ridgelines are generally wide, rolling and are
in pasture. The gullies on either side of the ridgelines become steeper and contain
pockets of scrub and bush.
Traversing across the site are Transpower lines that form part of the National Grid and
two Northpower owned Critical Overhead Lines. There are no Council owned
reticulated services for water supply, sanitary sewer disposal and stormwater at the
property boundary.
Operative and proposed District Plan zoning
The operative zones that apply to the site is a mix of Living 1, Living 3 and Business 3
Environments. The operative environment maps also identify that there are existing
Transpower lines and two critical electricity lines crossing the property as well as an
indicative road that was intended to connect O’Shea Road to Kotuku Street prior to
the construction of the Kotuku Dam. The resource maps identify that the valley floors
and land adjacent to the Nihotetea Stream are subject to Flood Susceptibility.
The WDC GIS Maps identify that the majority of the site is subject to a ‘High Instability
Risk ‘.
Both subject titles are proposed to be rezoned to the “Rural Production Zone’ (RPZ)
and is in PC88I.
The proposed zoning arrangement is shown on Proposed Planning Map 72 in
Attachment 2.
4. The specific provisions of the Plan Change that this submission relates to are:
All the plan changes, but particularly:
Plan Change 88 (Urban Plan Changes Technical Introduction)
Plan Change 88I (Living Zones)
Plan Change 148 (Strategic Direction and Subdivision)
Proposed Planning Map 72
The submission also relates to the consequential amendments to the Operative
District Plan text, including the definitions.
QDL opposes the plan changes in part.
www.reyburnandbryant.co.nz
5. QDL seeks the following amendments/relief:
1. To include Lot 2 DP 46220 and the area of Pt Lot 4 DP 19724 on the southern side
of the Nihotetea Stream in the Residential Zone as indicated on the plan in
Attachment 4, rather than RPZ as shown on the Proposed Planning Map 72.
2. Relief from compliance with provisions in Plan Changes 82A, 82B, 88, 88A-J, 109,
115, 136, 147, 148 where those provisions are inconsistent with the outcomes sought
for the land subject to this submission.
6. The reasons for making the submission on the plan changes are as follows:
1. The operative plan currently zones that land as a mix of Living and Business
zones. Rezoning to RPZ as proposed is not an efficient use of the land that is
typically surrounding by existing or future residential land use.
2. The large Raumaunga block to the south is proposed to be zoned RES.
Maintaining this zone on the subject site will be a logical extension of this zone.
3. The land is subject to several features that will need to be considered when the
site is developed, namely the Transpower and Northpower lines and also the High
Instability risk. The intensity of development provided for in the RES zone will
allow the site to be developed in a manner that will not compromise these
features.
4. The land is not subject to an ONL.
5. The rezoning of the land will not create any reverse sensitivity effects.
6. The RES represents the most effective and efficient use of the land relative to the
status quo and the RPZ having considered the requirements of s32 of the RMA.
7. The RES best achieves sustainable management under Part 2 of the RMA.
7. QDL wishes the Whangarei District Council’s decision to address the above issues
by:
1. Amend proposed Planning Map 72 by rezoning Lot 2 DP 46220 and the area of
Pt Lot 4 DP 19724 on the southern side of the Nihotetea Stream as RES rather
than RPZ as indicated in the plan attached at Attachment 3.
8. QDL wishes to be heard in support of their submission at a hearing if one is held.
www.reyburnandbryant.co.nz
_____________________
Emma Miller
Planning Consultant
On behalf of Quality Developments Limited
Dated this 3rd day of July 2019
www.reyburnandbryant.co.nz
ATTACHMENT 1
CERTIFICATE OF TITLES
www.reyburnandbryant.co.nz
ATTACHMENT 2
PLAN CHANGE MAP
DE 14
DE 15
DW 75
DW 90DW 92DW 91
DW 9
DW 94
DW 95
DTNZ 1
DTNZ 2
DVG 1
DVG 1
DNP 1
DNRC 2
DW 96
DW 96
DW 96DW 97
PKA
PKA
PKA
PKA
CLARKSONCRES
AWATEA ST
MO RNINGSIDE RD
ISOLA ST
KAHIWI ST
TOETOE RD
NELL PL
KIWI AVE
TEALLAN E
SH 14
DYER ST
MANUKA PL
IKATERE PL
DAKOTA PL
RANGER PL
WHAKAST
PURA KAU RD
WARWIC KPL
ANZAC R D
WAT TLE LANE
HEDL
EY
PL
MT PLEASANT RD
RAUMANGA VALLEY RD
KOTU
KUS T
KOWHAI PA R K R D
ASHLEY AV
E
K ERERU ST
TAUR
OAST
COLL I NGWOOD
ST
TEW
AIITI
P L
HIG HFIELD WAY
K OTARE CRES
TUI CRE S
GUMD
IGGER P L
ARCU S ST
MAUNU RD (SH14)O 'SH
EA RD KI OR EROA RD
SOUTH END AVE
SMEATON DRV
ACACIA DRV
PURIRI PARK RD
REWA REWA RD
QUARRY RD (OTIK)
FAIRBURN S T
TAUR OA ST
HIGH ST
MURDOCH CRES
RAUMANGA HEIGHTS DR
V
POMPALLIER ESTATEDRV
OTAIKA
RD(SH
1)
10
1370
6165
71
6266
72
75
6367
73
76
74
696864
Map 72 of 86
(C) Crown Copyright Reserved.Transpower New Zealand makes no representations about thesuitability of any information supplied to Whangarei District Council forany purpose. All intellectual property rights in this Database layer andthe data in it belong exclusively to Transpower. While all reasonableefforts have been made to ensure that up-to-date information isprovided to Whangarei District Council, Transpower New Zealandaccepts no responsibil ity for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies inthe information.
Date Updated:24/05/2019
Zone Map 72Z Raumanga
WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL PROPOSED PLANNING MAPA3 Scale: 1:10,000
±0 0.25 0.50.125 Km
www.reyburnandbryant.co.nz
ATTACHMENT 3
SUBMISSION PLAN
Catherin Servant Close
Puriri Park Road
OShe
a Ro
ad
State H
ighway 14
Pompallier Estate Drive
DESIGNATIONDNRC 2
DESIGNATIONDW 92
Raum
anga
Heigh
ts Dr
ive
KOTUKUDAM
NIHOTEA
LOT 2DP 46220
RT: NA1637/9
PART LOT 4DP 19724
RT: NA478/206
TAUR
OA S
T
ISOLA STREET
KAHIWI STREET
Raum
anga
Vall
ey R
d
Kotare Crescent
KOTU
KU S
TREE
T
WDC SCENICRESERVE
PART LOT 4DP 19724
RT: NA478/206
Rosella Pla
ce
Clarks
on Cre
s
Kowhai Park Rd
WDC SCENICRESERVE
NIHO
TEA
STREAM
NORTHPOWER CRITICA
L
OVERHEAD LINES CE
L
NORTHPOWER CRITICALOVERHEAD LINES CEL
NORTHPOWER CRITICA
L
OVERHEAD LINES CE
L
NORTHPOWER CRITICAL
OVERHEAD LINES CELNA
TION
AL G
RID
LINE
NATIO
NAL
GRID
LIN
E
STREAM
DESIGNATIONDNRC 2
QUALITY DEVELOPMENTS SUBMISSION PLANPROPOSED PLAN TO BE ZONED AS RESIDENTIALSA15597 - QUALITY DEVELOPMENTS - PLAN NOT TO SCALE
SUBMISSION AREA:TO BE ZONED RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED ZONING UNDER PLAN CHANGE 88I:RESIDENTIAL ZONE
PROPOSED ZONING UNDER PLAN CHANGE 88I:MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE
PROPOSED ZONING UNDER PLAN CHANGE 115:CONSERVATION ZONE
PROPOSED ZONING UNDER PLAN CHANGE 115:SPORT & ACTIVE RECREATION ZONE
PROPOSED ZONING UNDER PLAN CHANGE 115:OPEN SPACE ZONE
Attachment B
A copy of the relevant decision
25
Reporting Planners 42A Recommendation
124. These were addressed in paragraphs 220 – 223 of the s42A Report, Mr Burgoyne made the following recommendations:
• Amend Planning Map 72Z to rezone Acacia Drive from RPZ to a combination of GRZ and LRZ.
• Retain the zoning of Lot 2 DP 46220 and Part Lot 4 DP 19724 as notified.
• Retain the zoning of the properties to the west of Konini Street as notified.
Evidence from Submitters and Right of Reply
125. Emma Miller presented evidence on behalf of Quality Development supporting the submission relief seeking rezoning of Lot 2 DP 46220 and a portion of Pt Lot 4 DP 19724 to LRZ. Mr Burgoyne addressed this on pages 24 – 25 of Part 6 of the RoR Report. His opinion and recommendation to reject the submission point had not changed.
126. Ms Irving presented in opposition to the proposed LRZ zoning along Konini Street. No specific alternative zoning was sought at the hearing. Mr Burgoyne addressed this on page 25 of Part 6 of the RoR Report. His opinion and recommendation to reject the submission point had not changed.
127. No other evidence was specifically presented on this topic.
Discussion and Reasons
128. In relation to the submission from Quality Development Ltd Ms Miller’s evidence set out that constraints identified by the Reporting Officer did not bear scrutiny for rejecting the submission. She also stated that the lack of development on the two sites was not a legitimate reason to remove the development rights. Ms Miller provided a 2006 Archaeological Assessment of the site as part of her evidence. We visited the site and surrounding area as part of our site visits and also viewed the site from the end of O’Shea Road and Kotuku Street (dam).
129. The s42A report at pages 127 and 128 Mr Burgoyne outlined in the discussion section some constraints (high instability, hazards, flood susceptible, numerous archaeological sites etc) affecting the land and also gave some history of the timing and zoning of the land since about 1983. Mr Burgoyne stated that over the timeline he had shown, that limited progress had been made towards giving effect to the zoning and that in his opinion it is appropriate to now reconsider the appropriate zoning – we agree with his opinion and that is what is happening now. We also agree with Ms Miller that just because the site has not been developed means the development rights should be removed.
130. In Part 6 of the RoR at pages 24 and 25 Mr Burgoyne did agree that the lack of development progress is not a legitimate reason to remove development rights. However, he did consider that it is a legitimate reason to reconsider what the appropriate zoning should be. He considered that the rezoning is finely balanced as the sites demonstrate both LRZ and RPZ characteristics, but his opinion was the site is more consistent with the RPZ zoning criteria. In reaching this opinion he had taken into account the surrounding land uses/zonings, access to the site in future from O’Shea Road, the zoning of the other sites off O’Shea Road (zoned as RPZ), the history of the Maunu and Hora Hora Structure Plan which envisaged that the site would be accessed primarily off Kotuku Street, and how this had now changed due to construction of the dam and that the future indicative road from Kotuku road was to be removed as Part of Plan Change 109.
131. Having taken everything into account we agree with the Mr Burgoyne that the site should remained zoned as RPZ and the submission rejected accordingly.
132. We adopt the analysis of the s42A Report, as amended by the RoR, and agree that the submissions should be accepted or rejected accordingly.
556
MED
U-1
0
MED
U-1
1
WD
C-4
3
WD
C-8
FGL-
1
FGL-
1
NR
C-2
MED
U-5
3
NPL
-1
NZT
A-1
NZT
A-4
PKAPK
A
PKA
PKA
CLAR
KSONCRE
S
AWAT
EAST
MO
RN
ING
SID
ERD
ISO
LA S
T
KAH
I WI S
T
TOET
OER
D
NEL
L PL
KIW
I AVE
TE
AL LANE
SH 1
4
DYER STMANUKA PL
IKAT
ER
E PL
DAKOTA PL
RAN
GER
PL
WHA
KA
ST
PUR
AKA
UR
D
WAR
WIC
KPL
ANZAC
RD
WA
TTL
ELA
NE
HEDLEYPL
MT PLE
ASANT R
D
RAUM
ANG
AVA
LLE
YR
D
KOTUKUST
KOWHAI PARK
RD
ASHLEY AVE
KER
E RU
ST
TAUROAST
COL LING
W
OOD ST
TEWAIITIPL
HIG
HFIE
LDW
AY
KO
TAR
EC
RE
S
TUIC
RE
S
GUMDIGGERP
L
ARCU S
ST
MAUNU
RD(S
H14)
O'SHEARD
KIO
REROARD
SOU
THEN
DAV
ESMEA TO
NDR
V
ACA
CIA
DR
V
PUR
IRIP
ARK
RD
REW
A R
EWA
RD
QUAR
RYRD
( OTI
K)
FAIR
BUR
NS
T TAU
RO
AST
HIG
H S
T
MU
RD
OC
H C
RES
RAUM
ANG
AHE
IGHT
SDR
V
POMPALLIE
R
ESTATEDRV
OTAIKARD(SH1)
PREC
5
PREC
5
PREC
5
PREC
5
10
13
70
61
65 71
62
66 72
75
63
67 73
76
746968
64
Map
72
of 8
6
(C)
Cro
wn
Cop
yrig
ht
Re
serv
ed.
Tra
nsp
ow
er
Ne
w
Zea
lan
d m
ake
s
no
re
pre
sen
tatio
ns
a
bo
ut
the
suita
bili
ty o
f an
y i
nfo
rma
tio
n su
pp
lied
to
Wh
ang
are
i D
istr
ict
Co
unc
il fo
ran
y p
urp
ose
. All
inte
llect
ual
pro
pe
rty
rig
hts
in
th
is D
ata
ba
se
lay
er
and
the
da
ta i
n i
t b
elo
ng
exc
lusi
ve
ly t
o T
ran
spow
er.
Wh
ile a
ll re
as
on
able
effo
rts
h
av
e b
ee
n
ma
de
to
e
nsu
re
tha
t u
p-t
o-d
ate
in
form
atio
n
ispr
ovi
ded
to
W
ha
ng
are
i D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil,
Tra
nsp
ow
er
Ne
w
Ze
ala
ndac
cep
ts n
o r
esp
ons
ibili
ty f
or a
ny
err
ors
, om
iss
ion
s o
r in
acc
ura
cie
s in
the
inf
orm
ati
on.
Dat
e U
pdat
ed:1
2/05
/202
0
Zone
Map
72Z
R
aum
anga
Wha
ngar
ei D
istr
ict
Cou
nci
l Hea
ring
Pan
el R
ecom
men
dati
ons
Map
A3 S
cale
: 1:1
0,00
0
±0
0.25
0.5
0.12
5K
m
Attachment C
List of Persons to be Served Notice of Appeal
List of Names and Addresses to be Served
Submitter Number Name Email
FS x331 - 332 NZTA nita.chhagan@nzta.govt.nz
Recommended