Quacking Like a Duck? Functional Parenthood Doctrine and

Preview:

Citation preview

Chicago-Kent College of Law

From the SelectedWorks of Katharine K. Baker

2017

Quacking Like a Duck? Functional ParenthoodDoctrine and Same-Sex ParentsKatharine K. Baker

Available at: https://works.bepress.com/katharine_baker/34/

Chicago-Kent Law ReviewVolume 92Issue 1 Changing American State and FederalChildcare Laws

Article 7

7-26-2017

Quacking Like a Duck? Functional ParenthoodDoctrine and Same-Sex ParentsKatharine K. Baker

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview

Part of the Law Commons

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusionin Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, pleasecontact dginsberg@kentlaw.iit.edu.

Recommended CitationKatharine K. Baker, Quacking Like a Duck? Functional Parenthood Doctrine and Same-Sex Parents, 92 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 135 (2017).Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss1/7

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 75 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 75 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

We believe (as with ducks) that if it looks like a family, if it holds itself out as a family, and if it functions like a family, then it is a family.

See In re

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 75 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 75 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

SeeLegal Recognition of LGBT Families

see Second-Parent Adoption Laws,

Id.

See infra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 76 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 76 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

two

See infra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 76 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 76 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

opts outopt-in

See infraSee infraSee Voluntary Acknowledgements of Parentage for Same Sex Couples

See infra The DNA Default and its Discontents: Establishing Modern Parenthood

See infra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 77 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 77 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

See Partners, Care Givers, and the Constitutional Substance of Parenthoodin

See Marriage and Parenthood as Status and Rights: The Growing, Problem-atic and Possibly Constitutional Trend to Disaggregate Family Status from Family Rights,

The Hidden Structure of Taking Law

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 77 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 77 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

Id.

PrinceYoder

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 78 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 78 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

Parham “Parental” Rights

supra

Parents as Fiduciaries

Property Rules Meet Feminist Needs: Respecting Autonomy by Valuing Connection

See Lochner’s LegacyLochner v. New York

Lochner

supra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 78 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 78 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

Prince v. Massachusetts

parens patraie

Troxel v. Granville

Troxel

supraid.

See

supra

parens patriaeId. See

parens patriaeparens patriae

See Troxel

See also

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 79 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 79 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

, fillius nullius

supra Troxel

See e.g.

Legitimate Families and Equal Protection

See generally Marital Supremacy and the Constitution of the Nonmarital Family

Illegitimacy and Sex, Old and New

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 79 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 79 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

supraSee supra

See also supra

supra

See

See supra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 80 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 80 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

See Single Parent Adoptions

See also

See

Id.Id.

(

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 80 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 80 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

agreement

AB

C

AB C

B C Alegal

B C

A B

Id.

See id.See e.g.

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 81 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 81 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

B CA

Asymmetric Parenthood, in

Id.

See e.g.

See supra

The Genetic Tie

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 81 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 81 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

AB

B C

A B

A B

BC

B C

A. Function and Strong Intent: A and B Clearly Agree to Co-Parent

Holtzman v. Knot

See infraSee infraSee infra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 82 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 82 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

Holtzman

Holtzman

JAL v. EPH

ENO v. LLM

Id.Id.

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 82 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 82 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

Rubano v. DiCenzo

Frazier v. Goudschaal

Id.supra

Id.Id.

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 83 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 83 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

B. Function and Questionable Intent: A and B May Not Agree

HoltzmanJAL ENO

Janice M. v Margaret K

A.H. v. M.P.

ENO

In re

See infra

Madelyn B.

IdId.

Id.

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 83 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 83 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

A.H.

A.H.

A.H.

Debra H. v. Janice R.,Alison D. v. Virginia M

Id.

Id.

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 84 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 84 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

Debra H. Alison D.

Brooke S.B. v. Elizabeth A. C.C.

.

Janice MConover v. Conover

Conover

Id.Id.Debra H.

Id.Id. Id.

Id.

Id.

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 84 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 84 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

Conover

Conover

B C

C. Holding Out and The Relationship Between B and C

V.C. v. M.J.B

Id.

Id.

See

See supra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 85 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 85 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

Elisa B v. Superior Court

Chatterjee v. King

M.J.B.

See infraM.J.B.

Id See Personal Exemp-

tions and Dependents

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 85 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 85 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

Elisa BChatterjee

who how

Id.Id.

See also Elisa B. In re

See supra

See

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 86 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 86 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

See

infra

sin qua non

Id.See e.g. infra

Seeex rel.

ChatterjeeSee e.g. In re

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 86 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 86 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

D. Summary

See

In re

SeeSee generally supra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 87 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 87 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

B CChatterjee,

Eliza B M.J.B. Conover

B CA

.Chatterjee

Elisa B.

Lawrence v. TexasSee generally The Domesticated Liberty of ,

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 87 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 87 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

B C A

A B

A. VAPs as an Opting-in System

requires

See supra

. See supra

See Reforming Paternity Law to Eliminate Gender, Status, & Class Inequality

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 88 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 88 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

A BC A B

C

id.

See Homogenous Rules for Het-erogeneous Families: The Standardization of Family Law When There is No Standard Family

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 88 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 88 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

ex postex ante parens patraie

See supra

Seeparens patriae

parens patraie

See Parents Face Fines, Jail Time for Failure to ImmunizeThe

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 89 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 89 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

parens patraie

Truancy TrapIn This City, Parents Must Now Pay Up if Their Child is a Bully

See supraSee The Basics: Becoming a Legal Guardian in New York State

See

See

See

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 89 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 89 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

parens patraie

B. The Case Against Function

parens patraie

Prince v. Mass.parens patraie

See e.g.

A Feminist Proposal to Bring Back Common Law Marriage

Id.

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 90 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 90 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

Debra H.

M.J.B.

SeeSee infra

Rendering Children Illegitimate in Former Partner Parenting Cases: Hiding Behind the Façade of Certainty,

always

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 90 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 90 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

A.H.

See also In re

The Limits of Functional Family: Lesbian Mother Litigation in the Era of the Eternal Biological Family

See High Conflict Divorce

See generally supra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 91 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 91 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

See Family Court Reform and ADR: Shifting Values & Expectations Transform the Divorce Process,

See Introductionsupra

. See Fixed Rules and Discretion in Contemporary Family Law. and Succession Law

See generally supra

See Rethinking the Substantive Rules for Custody Disputes in Divorce

The Politics of Custody and the Transformation of American Custody Decision Making

Solomonic Judgments: Against the Best Interest of the Child

See

V.C. v. M.J.B.

Michael H

Which Ties Bind? Redefining the Parent-Child Relationship in an Age of Genetic Certainty

Burchard

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 91 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 91 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

A.H. M.J.B.not

Burchard

A BB C

B C

M.J.B.

supra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 92 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 92 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

a. Romantic Relationships

Couples and Coupling in the Public Sphere: A Comment on the Legal History of Litigating for Lesbian and Gay Rights

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 92 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 92 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

b. Two Parents

Frazier v. Goudschaalfamily unit

Chatter-jee

family.Frazier

Chatterjee

c. Consent

See The Paradox of Family Privacy

In re

In re

See

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 93 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 93 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

d. Protecting the Sperm Donor

See

Id.See

See generally Intent to Contract

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 93 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 93 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

Thomas S. v. Robin Y.

Jason P. v Danielle S.

E.E. v. O.M.G.R.

Gendering Legal Parenthood: Bio-Genetic Ties, Intentionality and Responsibil-ity

supra

See

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 94 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 94 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

e. Mothering

A.H.

See supra

supraSee supraSee e.g. In re

See Gallagher Pettinato See alsosupra

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 94 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 94 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

B C is

See The Problem with Unpaid Work

See generally

See Money, Housework, Sex and Conflict: Same-Sex Couples in Civil Unions, Those Not in Civil Unions, and Heterosexual Married Siblings

Supporting Children, Balancing Lives,

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 95 Side A

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 95 Side A 03/01/2017 10:44:39

QUACKING LIKE A DUCK

Id.

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet N

o. 95 Side B

03/01/2017 10:44:39

38779-ckt_92-1 Sheet No. 95 Side B 03/01/2017 10:44:39

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW

ex ante

ex post