National P2 Results Task Force Roll-out of P2 Results Data Management System

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

National P2 Results Task Force Roll-out of P2 Results Data Management System. Karen Frazier Director of Administration May 2005. National P2 Results Task Force. Purpose: develop a national measurement framework to capture environmental & economic outcomes from the implementation of P2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

National P2 Results Task ForceRoll-out of P2 Results Data

Management System

Karen FrazierDirector of Administration

May 2005

National P2 Results Task Force

• Purpose: develop a national measurement framework to capture environmental & economic outcomes from the implementation of P2

• Joint Project: NPPR & P2Rx

• Members: Broad geographic representation of state P2 programs and P2Rx Centers

Benefits

A National P2 Results Data Management System– Demonstrates publicly-supported P2 programs

delivering value for clients, public, & taxpayers– Helps policy makers assess P2 & understand what

works as they set priorities, goals & objectives– Assists government & others evaluating progress

toward P2 goals– Improves P2 program activities

Memorandum of Agreement

• Demonstrates Involvement in P2 Data Effort• Shows Support for National System &

Coordination with Regional P2Rx Centers• 21 State Organizations• One (1) Resource-Based Regional

Organization

Continue to gather signatures

MOA Signatories• Alabama Department of

Environmental Management• DC/MD/PA/VA - Alliance for the

Chesapeake Bay/Businesses for the BayIowa DNR

• Illinois Waste Management Research Center

• Indiana Clean Manufacturing Technology & Safe Materials Institute - Purdue University

• Maine Department of Environmental Protection

• Maryland Department of the Environment

• Massachusetts Office of Technical Assistance for Toxics Use Reduction

• Michigan DEQ

• Minnesota - Office of Environmental Assistance

• Minnesota Technical Assistance Program - University of Minnesota

• South Carolina DHEC Center for Waste Minimization

• Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) - Small Business & Environmental Assistance

• Utah DEQ• Vermont Department of

Environmental Conservation• Virginia DEQ• Washington State Department of

Ecology• Wisconsin - UW-Extension, Solid

& Hazardous Waste Education Center

MOA Results

Data Dictionary

• Defines: – Data elements for reporting – Units to be used– Categories of Core Elements– Crosswalking with other EPA Programs

• Addresses EPA P2 Strategic Targets

• Helps meet accountability & budget needs

Core Measures

• Outcome Measures

• Activity Measures

• Behavior Measures

• Investment in P2 Activities

Data Collection Process

Businesses / Organizations Generate Data

State / Local / Regional / Tribal Programs

Collect Data

Data Managed through Desktop Data

Tracking Systems

Data Aggregated Regionally via the Web

National P2

Results Report

Timeframe

• April to September 2005:– Continue state support & MOA process– Continue sharing data management tools– P2Rx Centers implement web-based

aggregation tool – Task Force discussions on implementation – Pursue Funding

Timeframe (continued)

• July 1, 2005– Updated data for 2001 to 2003 using NPPR

“Decade of Results” survey tool • September 2005

– 2004 data reported using new System• December 2005

– National aggregation of 2004 Data• June 2006

– System refinements• September 2006

– 2005 data reporting deadline

Resources

• NPPR and P2Rx actively seeking– Additional funding from EPA OPPT

(commitment received)– NEIEN funding - Colorado application

Note: No commitment of

resources required to participate

Further Information

• Jeff Burke (NPPR)jeff@p2.org

• Terri Goldberg (NEWMOA) tgoldberg@newmoa.org

• Chris Wiley (PPRC)cwiley@pprc.org

• Terry Grogan (EPA PPD)grogan.terry@epa.gov

• Jean Waters (P2RX)jwaters@mail.unomaha.edu

Recommended