Upload
roch
View
32
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
National P2 Results Task Force Roll-out of P2 Results Data Management System. Karen Frazier Director of Administration May 2005. National P2 Results Task Force. Purpose: develop a national measurement framework to capture environmental & economic outcomes from the implementation of P2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
National P2 Results Task ForceRoll-out of P2 Results Data
Management System
Karen FrazierDirector of Administration
May 2005
National P2 Results Task Force
• Purpose: develop a national measurement framework to capture environmental & economic outcomes from the implementation of P2
• Joint Project: NPPR & P2Rx
• Members: Broad geographic representation of state P2 programs and P2Rx Centers
Benefits
A National P2 Results Data Management System– Demonstrates publicly-supported P2 programs
delivering value for clients, public, & taxpayers– Helps policy makers assess P2 & understand what
works as they set priorities, goals & objectives– Assists government & others evaluating progress
toward P2 goals– Improves P2 program activities
Memorandum of Agreement
• Demonstrates Involvement in P2 Data Effort• Shows Support for National System &
Coordination with Regional P2Rx Centers• 21 State Organizations• One (1) Resource-Based Regional
Organization
Continue to gather signatures
MOA Signatories• Alabama Department of
Environmental Management• DC/MD/PA/VA - Alliance for the
Chesapeake Bay/Businesses for the BayIowa DNR
• Illinois Waste Management Research Center
• Indiana Clean Manufacturing Technology & Safe Materials Institute - Purdue University
• Maine Department of Environmental Protection
• Maryland Department of the Environment
• Massachusetts Office of Technical Assistance for Toxics Use Reduction
• Michigan DEQ
• Minnesota - Office of Environmental Assistance
• Minnesota Technical Assistance Program - University of Minnesota
• South Carolina DHEC Center for Waste Minimization
• Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) - Small Business & Environmental Assistance
• Utah DEQ• Vermont Department of
Environmental Conservation• Virginia DEQ• Washington State Department of
Ecology• Wisconsin - UW-Extension, Solid
& Hazardous Waste Education Center
MOA Results
Data Dictionary
• Defines: – Data elements for reporting – Units to be used– Categories of Core Elements– Crosswalking with other EPA Programs
• Addresses EPA P2 Strategic Targets
• Helps meet accountability & budget needs
Core Measures
• Outcome Measures
• Activity Measures
• Behavior Measures
• Investment in P2 Activities
Data Collection Process
Businesses / Organizations Generate Data
State / Local / Regional / Tribal Programs
Collect Data
Data Managed through Desktop Data
Tracking Systems
Data Aggregated Regionally via the Web
National P2
Results Report
Timeframe
• April to September 2005:– Continue state support & MOA process– Continue sharing data management tools– P2Rx Centers implement web-based
aggregation tool – Task Force discussions on implementation – Pursue Funding
Timeframe (continued)
• July 1, 2005– Updated data for 2001 to 2003 using NPPR
“Decade of Results” survey tool • September 2005
– 2004 data reported using new System• December 2005
– National aggregation of 2004 Data• June 2006
– System refinements• September 2006
– 2005 data reporting deadline
Resources
• NPPR and P2Rx actively seeking– Additional funding from EPA OPPT
(commitment received)– NEIEN funding - Colorado application
Note: No commitment of
resources required to participate
Further Information
• Jeff Burke (NPPR)[email protected]
• Terri Goldberg (NEWMOA) [email protected]
• Chris Wiley (PPRC)[email protected]
• Terry Grogan (EPA PPD)[email protected]
• Jean Waters (P2RX)[email protected]